Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW Agenda Packet 08/12/2003COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Meeting Location: Mt. Prospect Park District Community Center 1000 West Central Road Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald L. Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Irvana Wilks Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Michael Zadel II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF JULY 8, 2003 II1. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IV. 2003 MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW/2004 PRE-BUDGET WORKSHOP :For the past several years, the Village Board has engaged in a mid-year review of the current year Budget as a means of monitoring the revenue expenditure levels contained therein. Concomitantly, the Village Board also engages in a Pre-Budget Workshop, specifically designed to look forward toward the upcoming Budget year with the idea of setting fiscal parameters and giving staff direction for preparation of next year's Budget. With the close of June financial activity, staff is in the position to present mid-year financial data as well as review the 2004 Forecast Budget. Not surprisingly, the continuing down economy has had adverse impacts on Village revenue streams. Unless the economic climate changes dramatically in the last half of 2003, we can expect to end the year with a draw down in General Fund fund balance of some $1.4 million ($604,000 more than originally anticipated). Given current revenue trends, the 2004 Forecast Budget as it now stands, shows a General Fund deficit of approximately $840,000. This projected deficit exists despite the recently adopted Long-Range Financial Plan. For both 2003 and forecast 2004, the growth in the projected deficits continues to be a direct result of declining revenues. For both 2003 and forecast 2004, the deficits will need to be addressed by substantial expenditure reductions, the draw down of fund balance or the identification of new or additional revenue sources. Preparation of the 2004 Budget will be especially difficult in the coming months. Finance Director David Erb has provided a comprehensive memorandum detailing the Village's financial condition for both the balance of 2003 and forecast 2004. Staff will share its current Budget preparation strategy and look to the Village Board for direction regarding expenditure reductions and/or revenue additions. Appropriate staff will be on hand to answer questions and facilitate discussion. NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING.BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VlLLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE A T lO0 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064. V. BRANDING - VILLAGE LOGO/WEB SITE REDESIGN In 1999, the Community Development Department embarked on a corridor design project. One of the products of that effort was a logo, commonly referred to as "the keystone." This symbol was to be used in the corridor design projects throughout the Village - on wall installments, signs, banners, etc. Over the past few years, some Village departments have incorporated this design into their clothing and vehicle graphics. In an effort to coordinate and control use of the keystone symbol and other Village symbols, we are seeking direction from the Village Board on the overlying "branding" issue. It has been suggested a number of times that the Village undertake a "branding" effort. Branding can be used to convey a desired image to business and the public through use of Iogos and graphics that reflect a unified theme or message. Under this theory, Village materials would have a consistent look- from the newsletter to the web site, publications, vehicles, uniforms, street signs, etc. In addition, submitted for consideration is a revised version of the keystone logo for use in the Village newsletter and redesigned web site. Also for the Board's consideration, are two sample versions of a home page redesign for the Village's web site. Appropriate staff will be on hand to answer questions and facilitate discussion. VI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT VII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT II. III. MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JULY 8, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor Gerald Farley, in the Mt. Prospect Park District Community Center, 1000 West Central Road. Present at the meeting were: Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, Richard Lohrstorfer, Michaele Skowron and Michael Zadel. Absent from the meeting was: Trustee Irvana Wilks. Staff members present included: Village Manager Michael Janonis, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, Community Development Director William Cooney, Chief Michael Figolah, Deputy Fire Chief John Malcolm, Police Chief Richard Eddington, Deputy Police Chief Ronald Richardson, Public Works Director Glen Andler, Deputy Public Works Director Sean Dorsey, Administrative Analyst Jason Leib and Deputy Finance Director Carol Widmer. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of Minutes from April 22, 2003. Motion made by Trustee Zadel and Seconded by Trustee Skowron. Minutes were approved. Approval of Minutes from May 13, 2003. Motion made by Trustee Lohrstorfer and Seconded by Trustee Skowron. Minutes were approved. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. IV. 2004-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Village Manager Michael Janonis introduced the topic by providing an overview of the Capital Improvements Plan program process. He stated this is a planning document and an acceptance of the CIP plan does not guarantee funding in the appropriate budget year. He stated there is approximately $1.6 million in projects slated for 2004 which have been delayed due to the budget situation of the Village. He stated the Plan had been provided to the Finance Commission on June 19 for their input and the Minutes of that meeting have been included for the Village Board's information. He said the focus this evening will be on 2004 and any change in scope or the various projects that have previously appeared. He stated the 2004 Financing Plan which the Village Board has tentatively approved includes a permanent funding source for CIP projects into the future. Assistant Village Manager David Strahl provided information on the various projects slated for Village Administration including funds for completion of the TV studio for the new Village Hall. He also highlighted the potential for a new phone system in 2007 and a new financial software package within the next four years. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: It was suggested that any video conferencing money be carefully scrutinized to make sure there is appropriate benefit prior to expenditure. It was also pointed out that the projected replacement cost for the Village phone system is likely too Iow based on current experience. Community Development Director Bill Cooney provided an overview of the various projects related to Community Development. The bulk of the funding that he highlighted includes the completion of the Village Hall/Parking Deck in addition to streetscape costs associated with the completion of the civic block including the Library. Fire Chief Michael Figolah provided a summary of the projects slated for the Fire Department. Among those is the seed money for the study of a new Fire Station location on the north side. He also stated there is money in for a diesel exhaust system which is considered a safety item. He said there is money set aside for thermal imaging cameras for 2005, however, the Department has submitted a Grant application for the diesel exhaust system. If the Grant is looked upon favorably, the money that would normally be allotted for the diesel exhaust system would be covered by a Grant and the thermal imaging cameras would be moved into 2004 with the savings from the diesel exhaust system. Police Chief Richard Eddington highlighted the recommended purchases for the Police Department. Among those items are six laptops for the Investigation Unit. He also stated that the Department is in the process of applying for a Grant to help cover the cost of the purchase. He stated the two most critical items for 2004 are the digital surveillance equipment to monitor the jail cells and the update to the shooting range to eliminate bullets coming back at the Officers during shooting practice. Public Works Director Glen Andler highlighted the various projects that he is anticipating. Among those is the McDonald Creek program scheduled for 2008. He stated this money is intended to address similar issues that had been present at Weller Creek and to rectify them in a similar manner. H e a Iso highlighted t hat t he increase i n t he Shared Cost Sidewalk Program is now closer to the real 50/50 split cost. He stated the change in the bridge rehabilitation cost is based on recent experience with the repair of the William Street Bridge. He stated there is money in for Busse Road improvements assuming there is some movement by Cook County for planning of this road improvement. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: There was a question and discussion regarding Central Road resurfacing and reconstruction and the option of jurisdictional transfer. John Korn, Chairman of the Finance Commission, spoke. He stated the Commission is supportive of the ClP program as presented and encourages the shift of funding based on Grant monies being available for the Fire Department. Consensus of the Village Board was to present the ClP Plan to the Village Board for approval in the near future. COMMUTER PARKING FEE INCREASE Village Manager Janonis stated that staff has been discussing the potential for a fee increase as part of the overall Financial Plan. He stated that based on projections of maintenance, the current fee cannot sustain the cost of maintaining the lots long term. VI. Public Works Administrative Analyst Jason Leib provided a presentation to the Village Board illustrating the projected cost of maintaining lots in the future and. how the revenue stream is impacted by the current charge. He stated the fee per day has not changed in at least 15 years and based on the analysis of parking fees up and down the Northwest line, the average is slightly higher than the current charge by Mount Prospect. Public Works Director Glen Andler a Iso stated that staff is undertaking an automated collection system to improve the collection of the parking fees in addition to improving the accounting for the fees. He stated the system should be operational by September. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: It was recommended that there be some comparison of costs of private lot parking compared the current Village parking rate. There was also a discussion regarding the projected life of the swipe card along with possible savings associated with bank fees processing the cash. Dale Draznin, 220 South Hatlen, spoke. She stated that raising the commuter fees 50% is a large increase. She stated the cost of parking should track actual costs not additional costs or future costs. She also suggested a separate fee for residents and non-residents. Consensus of the Village Board was to raise the daily parking to $1.50 and review the cost of maintenance to determine what impact inflation has on the overall fund. MAYOR PRO TEM PROTOCOL DISCUSSION Village Manager Janonis stated that he feels that the Mayor Pro Tem function is covered for meetings and for emergency situations. However, he feels it would be worthwhile for the Village Board to consider a de facto Mayor Pro Tern to sign documents in the event the Mayor is unavailable and between meetings. He stated that such an appointment for a Mayor Pre Tem to serve a specific period does not require a change in government. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: There was general support for a standing Mayor Pro Tem for a specific period of time. It was also suggested that the Mayor Pro Tem be considered for removal based on a possible super majority vote. It was also suggested that the Mayor Pre Tem designation be made prior to actual need. Consensus of the Village Board was to request that staff continue some additional research and provide a draft Ordinance based on the comments of the Village Board. VII. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Village Manager Janonis stated that the weekend storms had very little overall physical impact on the Village, therefore, requiring little clean up of damage. He also stated that the next Coffee with Council is scheduled for July 12 at Village Hall from 9:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. 3 III. IX. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Trustee Michaele Skowron wanted to thank the support of the Village employees for the outstanding job they do in coordinating the annual 4th of July Carnival. ADJOURNMENT Them being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _ ,~, /,") DAVID STRAHL Assistant Village Manager DS/mc illage of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DATE: AUGUST 8, 2003 SUBJECT: MATERIALS FOR COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 2003 Attached please find the "2003 Mid-Year Review and Update of the 2004 Budget Forecast" as prepared by the Finance Department. Included in the report is the transmittal memo drafted by Carol Widmer, Deputy Finance Director and several exhibits that assist the reader in their understanding of the report. In addition, there are two additional exhibits that illustrate the impact to the General Fund fund balance from operations in 2003 (Exhibit 5) and a fund balance history from 1999 through 2004 (Exhibit 6). Exhibit 5 is a comparison of the adopted budget versus current estimate for calendar year 2003. The adopted budget authorized a drawdown of fund balance of $802,023. Based on current estimates, the deficit in the General Fund for 2003 is expected to be $1,406,088. Drawing down on the entire amount of the deficit reduces the fund balance to 24.9% of expenditures (as compared to the adopted budget level of 26.0%). Exhibit 6 provides a fund balance history for the General Fund from 1999 through 2004. Based on projections for 2003 and the 2004 forecast, the fund balance is expected to drop to $7,202,863 or 21.7% of expenditures by 12/31/2004. I am planning a PowerPoint presentation for the upcoming COW meeting and will be prepared to answer any questions related to the report. Please review the information and contact me to discuss. DAVID O. ERB DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Copy: Carol Widmer, Deputy Finance Director cover letter to mid-year review materials Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE JULY 17, 2003 2003 MID-YEAR REVIEW AND UPDATE OF THE 2004 BUDGET FORECAST Traditionally, the Village Board has engaged in a mid-year review of the financial status of the current year's budget and also reviewed the forecast for the upcoming year. Not only are these actions considered prudent fiscal management practices, but they also provide the foundation for the preparation of the upcoming annual budget. This memorandum is intended to supplement the June 30, 2003 Budget Revenue and Expenditure Summaries submitted with the July 15th Board meeting agenda packet. The principal focus of this memorandum is on the General Fund, since it is the main operating fund of the Village. Also discussed to a lesser degree are a few of the more material operating and capital project funds. It should be pointed out that the current estimates of revenues and expenditures for 2003 are just that - estimates. There could still be significant variances that appear or disappear during the remaining six months of the fiscal year. 2003 MID-YEAR REVIEW GENERAL FUND The 2003 Adopted Budget reflects a planned deficit of $802,023 on revenues of $29,221,405 and expenditures of $30,023,428. The deficit can be attributed to a carryover of uncompleted projects from 2002. As part of the mid-year review, we looked at all revenue and expenditure accounts to determine if any material variances seem likely. We now expect total General Fund revenues to come in at $28,431,060, almost $790,345 below than what was originally projected. Expenditures are now estimated at $29,667',148, which is a decrease of $186,280 from the original budget. The reduction in expenditure is the result of the hiring freeze imposed over the last few months. The hiring freeze remains in place at this time. Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 2 After taking the $170,000 transfer to the 2001 and 2003 debt service funds into consideration, the fund balance is expected to drop $1,406,088 in 2003, compared to the $802,023 reflected in the adopted budget. Exhibit 1, attached hereto, presents a summary of our current projections of revenues and expenditures, with a comparison to budget. General Fund Revenues: On the surface it would appear General Fund revenues are doing relatively well compared to our original projections. Halfway through the fiscal year, actual revenues of $15,563,254 represent 53.3% of budget. The following chart shows year-to-date revenue collections as a percentage of annual budget for each of the main revenue categories. General Fund Revenue Collections as a Percent of Annual Budget 90 8O 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 o- Revenue Type However, as can be seen in the preceding chart, revenues in several categories are below the 50% benchmark set as of June 30th. Property tax revenues of $3,600,746 are running at 46% of budget, which is slightly on the Iow side. As Cook County is granting more successful property tax assessment appeals we are finding our property tax revenue dropping slightly. We are now estimating that we will lose 1.5% of our levy, as opposed to the 1% previously assumed. Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 3 We expect our property tax receipts to come in $117,175 less than budget for the year. Revenues classified as "Other Taxes" include such sources as the food and beverage tax, real estate transfer tax, hotel/motel tax, telecommunications tax and the utility tax. In total, revenue collections from "Other Taxes" came to $1,957,665 as of June 30th, which is 51.7% of annual budget. The Village's telecommunications tax and the utility tax on electricity and natural gas are running slightly below budget. However, we expect to receive the budgeted amount by the end of the year. Collections from licenses and permit fees totaled $2,068,763, or 81.7% of the $2.5 million budget. Vehicle license revenue of $982,085 is at 86% of budget, which is to be expected given that the deadline for the 2003/2004 vehicle sticker was May 1st. We expect to receive almost all of the projected revenue at year end. Cable television franchise fees are running lower than expected. We have collected $160,620 or 46.3% of the $346,800 budgeted in 2003. Intergovernmental revenues totaled $6,838,882 as of June 30th, which is 52.2% of the $13.1 million annual budget. Intergovernmental revenues in the General Fund include the local share of the state sales tax, state income tax, use tax, replacement tax and other miscellaneous state and federal grants. Sales tax collections, which make up more than 65% of the "Intergovernmental" category, are at $3,813,128. This represents 44.6% of budget. The current budget forecast is $7,942,386, a budget variance of $597,814. Our year-to-date collections are running 7.0% below the same period last year. We just received notification of the July payment and that is 20.9% higher than last year's amount. This increase was the result of large sales from one retailer. Receipts from the State's distribution of the state income tax totaled $2,653,913 at June 30th. This represents 70.7% of budget, however the figure is somewhat deceiving. Local governments do not receive state income tax receipts evenly throughout the year. Historically, receipts are higher during the first half of the year as taxpayers make their final tax payments in March and April. 2003 receipts are currently running 1% below last year's collections. We will watch this revenue closely to be certain it stays on track with our projections. Currently we are expecting $79,226 less than projected. The local share of the state use tax is expected to come in slightly below projections for the year. This is the result of decreased use tax reporting, and not a change in the allocation formula set by the State as was being considered down in Springfield. Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 4 Revenue from Fines totaled $239,513 for the first six months. This represents 49.1% of the $487,960 budgeted for the year. We expect the revenue to meet our budgeted expectations for 2003. Investment income totaled only $95,782 for the first six months, representing 36% of the $265,000 projected for the year. A negative variance of $50,000 is expected for the year due to declining interest rates. Miscellaneous Revenue, consisting of reimbursements and other revenues, totaled $356,900 as of June 30th. This is 82% of the $436,720 budgeted for the year. There is one extreordinary item causing the high percentage of year-to-date revenue. That is the receipt of $84,398 for ceding our private activity bond volume cap earlier in the year. This trensaction was not included in the 2003 revenue projection. General Fund Expenditures: The adopted 2003 budget totals $29,853,428. As of June 30th the Village had recorded expenditures of $13,867,850 (including fund trensfers of $85,000). This represents 46.1% of budget. While total expenditures are within 4% of the benchmark of 50%, there is a much larger disparity within specific departments and programs. The following chad illustretes General Fund expenditures by department/progrem as a percentage of annual budget. Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 5 General Fund Expenditures as a Percent of Annual Budget Public Repr~'~"~l~t,'!~ ..! I 'l 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Percent Public Representation expenditures totaled $70,106 through June 30th, representing 67.3% of budget. The reason this program is above the 50% benchmark is that organizational memberships are typically paid in the beginning of the year. In the first half of the fiscal year membership dues totaling $29,236 were paid, compared to the annual budget of $33,000. Expenditures of the Village Manager's Office for the first six months totaled $782,324, This represents 44% of their $1.8 million annual budget. Expenditures are expected to come in very close to budget. Information Technology Division and Public Information Division expenditures are currently at 43% and 34% of budget, respectively, due to the timing of operating expenditures and capital purchases. Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 6 Expenditures of the Television Services Division came to $80,202 for the first six months of 2003. This is 44% of the division's annual budget of $181,389. Expenditures of the Human Services Department totaled $313,178 at June 30th, representing 41% of budget. Police and Fire Department expenditures for the six months just ended are very close to the budget benchmark, at 47% and 48%, respectively. Public Works Department expenditures funded through the General Fund totaled $2,154,669 for the first half of the fiscal year. This represents 44% of the annual budget of $4,913,483. The reason for the relatively large variance from the 50% benchmark is the timing of certain projects and expenditures. Projects such as sidewalk construction and grounds maintenance are more likely to be initiated and paid for during the summer months. The Miscellaneous category in the above chart includes the Community and Civic Services budget program and the miscellaneous retirement pensions of two former employees. At the mid-year mark, Community and Civic Services expenditures of $82,751 represent 29.5% of the $280,491 budget. For the past several years, total General Fund expenditures have come in anywhere from one to three percent under budget. Although we see no reason at this point to believe 2003 will be any different, to be conservative we are generally not showing any variance from budget for General Fund expenditures as reflected in Exhibit 1. The only exceptions are the savings from the hiring freeze that was imposed earlier this year. REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND Revenues received to-date of $1,564,098 are at 47% of projections. the first six months totaled $1,460,264, representing 44% of budget. Expenditures for MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND Revenues of $829,028 through June 30th represent 50% of projections. Our MFT allotments from the State are running 6% ahead of 2002. We had assumed 1% for the 2003 Budget. Expenditures totaled $1,487,791 at June 30th, which is 60% of budget. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND CDBG Fund expenditures totaled $100,437 to-date. This is 18% of the $563,457 budgeted for the year. CDBG expenditures fall into four categories. Following is a breakdown of expenditures incurred to-date, compared to annual budget for the four categories. Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 7 Administration $ 19,557 $ 44,951 43.5% Community Programs 20,318 91,050 22.3 Neighborhood Improve. 52,313 190,506 27.5 Residential Rehab 8,249 236,950 3.5 Total $100,437 $563,457 17.8% Historically, the majority of CDBG expenditures have been incurred during the second half of the year. CAPITAl._ IMPROVEMENT FUND Revenues were projected at $622,200 for the year. Through June 30th we have received $114,517 or 18% of budget. $387,400 of grant revenue is expected later in the year. The approved budget for this fund is $1,331,092. Total expenditures for the first six months were $442,779, or 33% of budget. Most of the capital projects and improvements budgeted for the year will be initiated during the summer months. DOWNTOWN REDEVEI-OPMENT CONSTRUCTION FUND The 2003 Budget shows estimated revenues of $427,884. As of June 30th we had received $1,483,896. This figure included $1,225,000 from Norwood Builders for the sale for the former Northwest Electric site. This will be brought forward as a budget amendment later this year. A total of $64,389 has been expended to date, which represents 4% of the $1.1 million budget for 2003. STREET IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION FUND This fund was created to account for the 1997 revenue enhancements that are earmarked for the street improvement program. Revenues of $1,820,765 were projected for 2003. Revenues actually received as of June 30th total $923,344, or 51% of budget. A total of $3,688,673 has been budgeted for street resurfacing and reconstruction. As of June 30th only $1,638,771, or 32%, has been expended. The vast majority of the payouts will take place in the second half of the year. Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 8 FLOOD CONTROL CONSTRUCTION FUND The only revenue expected to be collected in this fund is interest income of $20,000. To-date, $15,117 or 75% of that amount has been received. A total of $197,744 (38%) has been spent thus far out of the $518,027 annual budget. WA TER AND SEWER FUND Revenues through June 30th total $3,577,234, representing 43% of budget. This is typical, as water consumption increases during the summer months. Expenditures are budgeted at $9,604,119 for the year. After six months, actual expenditures have totaled $3,494,908, or 36% of budget. Expenditures appear to be Iow because of capital improvements planned for later in the year. There are no material variances expected between now and the end of the year. POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION FUNDS Revenues in the Police and Firefighters' Pension Funds increased significantly due to market gains on equities this year. The Police Pension Fund has recorded revenues totaling 73% of projections. The Firefighters' Pension Fund revenues are at 69% of budget. 2004 FORECAST The 2003 Annual Budget includes a forecast budget for the year 2004 for each operating and capital project funds. The purpose of this portion of my memorandum is to bring forward any material variances in revenues or expenditures now expected for the year 2004. GENERAL FUND Exhibit 2 has been prepared to compare the original forecast numbers to our most recent estimates. The original forecast budget shows an operating deficit of $1,117,647 on revenues of $30,490,645 and expenditures totaling $31,608,292. Including fund transfers, the total projected deficit for the General Fund for 2004 is $1,387,647. Generally speaking, the deficit is the result of anticipated revenues not keeping up with the growth in expenditures. Our more recent estimates now show that the operating deficit has decreased to $437,973. The total projected deficit (including transfers and staff initiated cuts) is $840,973. The revenue enhancements approved by the Village Board would have resulted in an excess of revenues over expenditures but information just received from the Illinois Municipal League (IML) has changed the favorable outlook. The IML reported that state income and state use taxes will not meet our 2004 projections. This Mid-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 9 will be explained further under the appropriate revenue category. Revenues: At this time we expect General Fund revenues for 2004 to come in $946,010 higher than what was projected twelve months ago. The forecast assumes that the overall property tax increase will be 4.8% with a portion of the increase going towards debt service on the new village hall. Sales tax receipts are expected to show an increase over our current 2003 projection including $150,000 expected from the new Costco store due to open in August of 2004. However, even with the increase we are still expecting the receipts overall to decrease $678,795 from our original forecast. Our forecast for the state income tax is reflecting the information provided by the Illinois Municipal League and they estimate the state will reduce the per capita distribution. Therefore, we have reduced our forecast by $513,456. The $3,353,394 forecast is $321,606 less than we expect to receive in 2003. Other Intergovernmental Revenues are showing a decrease of $114,868 from the forecast again due to forecast information from the IML which caused us to decrease our estimate for the state use tax. We had originally projected use tax revenue of $610,000 for 2004 and now our projection is $495,132. The weighted average yield of our investment portfolio continues to drop as investments with higher interest rates mature and are replaced at lower interest rates. At this time we expect to meet our forecast of investment income of $265,000 in 2004, Expenditures: At this time we are exPecting expenditures to remain consistent with the original forecast with the exception of staff initiated cuts of $500,000 and increases in pension contributions for the Police and Fire and IMRF pension plans. The staff initiated cuts are reflected under other financing uses as are the expected equity transfer to the debt service funds and the transfer to the Capital Improvement Fund. BUDGETCALENDAR Attached as Exhibit 3 is the 2004 budget calendar as presented in the current 2003 budget document. If this schedule now presents any conflicts, we should revise it as soon as possible. id-Year Budget Review July 17, 2003 Page 10 YEAR 2004 BUDGET DIRECTION Finally, I have attached a copy of the New Project/Service Suggestion Form (Exhibit 4). This form is intended for use by the Village Board to facilitate communication between the Board and staff concerning any new ideas they would like to see included in the 2004 proposed budget. It would be helpful if the forms could be returned to you by August 29, 2003 so that the ideas can be incorporated in to our preliminary budget deliberations. CAROL L. WlDMER DEPUTY FINANCE DIRECTOR Copy: Finance Commission Members Department Directors Exhibit 1 Revenues: Property Taxes Sales Taxes Food and Beverage Tax Real Estate Transfer Tax Telecommunications Tax Utility Taxes Other Taxes Vehicle Licenses Other Licenses, Permits, Fees State Income Tax Other Intergovernmental Charges for Services Fines and Forfeits Investment Income Reimbursements Other Revenue Total Revenues Expenditures Public Representation Village Manager's Office Television Services Division Village Clerk's Office Finance Department Community Development Dept. Human Services Dept. Police Department Fire Department Public Works Department Community and Civic Services Miscellaneous Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues over Expend. Other Financing Uses Equity Transfer 2001 and 2003 D/S funds Transfer to Capital Improve. Fd. Total Other Financing Uses Excess of Revenues over Expend. and Other Financing Uses: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT General Fund Revenues and Expenditures 2003 Budget 2003 YTD Actual 2003 Variance- 2002 Adopted 01/01/03- Current Favorable Actual Budget 6/30/2003 Estimate (Unfavorable) 7,228,932 7,811,655 3,600,746 7,694,480 (117,175) 7,852,454 8,540,200 3,813,128 7,942,386 (597,814) 490,621 492,800 174,626 425,000 (67,800) 1,016,563 750,000 417,688 800,000 50,000 723,797 1,346,400 603,453 1,346,400 0 936,202 1,005,128 678,422 1,005,128 0 186,576 190,730 83,476 190,730 0 1,128,675 1,140,000 982,085 1,135,000 (5,000) 1,759,079 1,392,130 1,086,678 1,383,800 (8,330) 3,690,811 3,754,226 2,653,913 3,675,000 (79,226) 754,490 793,503 371,841 793,503 0 762,224 814,953 405,003 814,953 0 521,289 487,960 239,513 487,960 0 314,886 265,000 95,782 215,000 (50,000) 494,881 297,570 181,390 297,570 0 232,664 139,150 175,510 224,150 85,000 Notes A B C D E F G h I J k L 28,094,144 29,221,405 15,563,254 28,431,060 (790,345) 100,879 104,167 70,106 104,167 0 1,360,166 1,785,366 782,324 1,785,366 0 172,215 181,389 80,202 181,389 0 139,470 150,792 76,600 150,792 0 1,374,800 1,293,086 613,047 1,269,016 24,070 1,370,807 1,549,293 669,319 1,511,523 37,770 710,332 756,285 313,178 726,655 29,630 9,777,086 10,445,481 4,912,663 10,426,191 19,290 7,846,295 8,353,838 4,014,127 8,318,268 35,570 4,946,818 4,913,483 2,154,669 4,873,533 39,950 278,423 280,491 82,751 280,491 0 15,626 39,757 13,864 39,757 0 M N O P Q R 28,092,917 29,853,428 13,782,850 29,667,148 186,280 1,227 (632,023) 1,780,404 (1,236,088) (604,065) 0 (170,000) (85,000) (170,000) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,227 (170,000) (85,000) (170,000) 0 (802,023) 1,695,404 (1,406,088) (604,065) 8/8/20038:32 AMGen Fund rev & exp 2003 Exhibit 1 as of August 8, 2003 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT GeneralFund Revenues and Expenditures 2003 Notes A We now expect a 1.5% uncollected rate on property taxes, verses 1%. B Sales tax receipts are running 7% below the prior year. Current estimate assumes 2% growth for year. C Food and beverage tax collections are down through 6/30. A reflection of the economy. D The state is collecting and remitting telecommunications tax to the Village. We expect to receive the budgeted amount. E The utility taxes on both natural gas and electricity are running close to budget. F Hotel tax is expected to meet budgeted amount. G Cable TV franchise fees are expected to run $25,000 below budget. H State income tax receipts are running 1% below budget through 6/30. Assuming 2-3% reduction for year. The local share of the state use tax is expected to come in about $20,000 below budget. The personal property replacement tax is expected to come in $15,000 below budget. J Police fines are expected to run $25,000 more than budget. K Lower interest rates are expected to result in a $50,000 shortfall in investment earnings. L Other revenues are expected to exceed projections by $85,000 due to the ceding of the private activity bond volume cap which was not budgeted for. M-R Reflects reduced expenditures due to hiring freeze and other vacant positions. 8/8/20038:32 AMGen Fund rev & exp 2003 Exhibit 2 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT General Fund Revenues and Expenditures 2004 Forecast 2003 2004 Forecast Current Original Current Increase Percent ProJections Forecast Forecast (Decrease) Chan~le Notes Revenues: Property Taxes 7,694,480 8,164,527 8,164,527 0 0.00 A Sales Taxes 7,942,386 9,166,300 8,489,505 (678,795) (7.40) B Food and Beverage Tax 425,000 502,656 440,000 (62,656) (12.46) C Real Estate Transfer Tax 800,000 780,000 780,000 0 0.00 Telecommunications Tax 1,346,400 1,373,328 2,211,113 837,785 61.00 D Utility Taxes 1,005,128 1,025,130 1,177,130 152,000 14.83 E Home Rule Sales Tax 0 0 1,326,000 1,326,000 F Other Taxes 190,730 194,830 194,830 0 0.00 Vehicle Licenses 1,135,000 1,140,000 1,140,000 0 0.00 G Other Licenses, Permits, Fees 1,383,800 1,405,630 1,405,630 0 0.00 State Income Tax 3,675,000 3,866,850 3,353,394 (513,456) (13.28) H Other Intergovernmental 793,503 811,056 696,188 (114,868) (14.16) Charges for Services 814,953 839,038 839,038 0 0.00 Fines and Forfeits 487,960 504,700 504,700 0 0.00 I Investment Income 215,000 265,000 265,000 0 0.00 J Reimbursements 297,570 307,950 307,950 0 0.00 K Other Revenue 224,150 141,650 141,650 0 0.00 Total Revenues 28,431,060 30,490,645 31,436,655 946,010 3.10 Expenditures Public Representation 104,167 110,938 110,938 0 Village Manager's Office 1,785,366 1,832,902 1,832,902 0 Television Services Division 181,389 193,356 193,356 0 Village Clerk's Office 150,792 160,172 160,172 0 Finance Department 1,269,016 1,371,654 1,371,654 0 Community Development Dept. 1,511,523 1,824,543 1,824,543 0 Human Services Dept. 726,655 815,376 815,376 0 Police Department 10,426,191 10,937,764 11,095,894 158,130 Fire Department 8,318,268 8,789,330 8,897,536 108,206 Public Works Department 4,873,533 5,229,453 5,229,453 6 Community and Civic Services 260,491 289,013 289,013 0 Miscellaneous 39,757 53,791 53,791 0 Total Expenditures 29,667,148 31,608,292 31,874,628 266,336 Excess of Revenues over Expend. Other Financing Uses Staff initiated Cuts Equity Transfer 2001 and 2003 D/S Funds Transfer to Capital Improve. Fd. Total Other Financing Uses Additional IMRF expense Excess of Revenues over Expend. and Other Financing Uses: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 (1,236,088) (1,117,647) (437,973) 679,674 500,000 500,000 (170,000) (270,000) (270,000) 0 0 0 (550,000) (550,000) (170,000) (270,000~ (3201000) (50,000) (83,000) (83,000) M ,406,088) (1,387,647) (840,973) 546,674 8/8/200311:20 AM2004 Gen Fund Forecast with IML figures Exhibit 2 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT General Fund Revenues and Expenditures 2004 Forecast Notes A 4.8% overall property tax hike proposed, B Sales tax receipts estimated to increase 5% over 2003 projected receipts (plus $150,000 for Costco) C Food and beverage tax estimated to increase 5% over 2003 projected receipts. D Telecommunications tax estimate includes 1.75% increase and 3 months of revenues from Street Improvement Fund. E Utility tax receipts on natural gas include 3 months of revenue from Street Improvement Fund. F Home Rule Sales Tax 1/4 cent established 1/04. G Vehicle license fees have remained relatively constant for past few years. H Income tax receipts estimated at approximately 7.5% above 2003 projections. Assumes fine revenue will increase slightly in 2004. J Assumes interest rates remain constant. K Does not assume fee for ceding volume cap is received in 2004. L Represents additional Police & Fire Pension contribution per actuarial report M IMRF 2004 employer rate assumption 6% - IMRF notification 7.5% 8/8/200311:20 AM2004 Gen Fund Forecast with IML figures Exhibit 3 2003 DATE 3/15/02 4/12/02 5/13/02 to 5/17/02 5/24/02 6/07/02 6/27/02 7/09/02 7/16/02 7/19/02 8/06/02 8/13/02 8/19/02 8/23/02 9/04/02 to 9/10/02 9/17/02 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET CALENDARS 2003 and 2004 ACTION Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Worksheets forwarded to Department Directors Completed CIP Worksheets returned to Finance Department Depaxhtsent CIP reviews with Village Manager and Finance Director Complete Proposed CIP Amounts Deliver Proposed CIP to Village Board and Finance Commission Review Proposed CIP with Finance Commission Committee of the Whole - CIP Review Session Acceptance of Proposed CIP at Village Board Meeting Budget Worksheets forwarded to Depadlnent Directors CIP available for distribution Committee of the Whole - Mid-Year Budget Review and Pre-Budget Workshop Completed Budget Worksheets returned to Finance Department Revenue Estimates completed by Finance Department Department Budget reviews with Village Manager and Finance Director Complete Proposed Budget Amounts 2004 DATE 3/14/03 4/11/03 5/12/03 to 5/16/03 5/23/03 6/6/03 6/26/03 7/8/03 7/15/03 7/18/03 8/5/03 8/12/03 8/18/03 8/22/03 9/3/03 to ~9/03 9/16/03 2003 DATE 10/08/02 10/08/02 10/17/02 10/24/02 11/07/02 11/14/02 10/22/02 11/12/02 11/26/02 12/03/02 12/03/02 12/17/02 1/17/03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET CALENDARS 2003 and 2004 ACTION Deliver Proposed Budget to Village Board and Finance Commission Proposed Budget available for public inspection at the Village Clerk's Office and the Mount Prospect Public Library Review ProPosed Budget with the Finance Commission Committee of the Whole - First Budget Hearing (7:00 pm - 10:00 pm) Overview, Village Administration, Finance & Human Services Committee of the Whole - Second Budget Hearing (7:00 pm - 10:00 pm) Police, Fire and Community Development Committee of the Whole - Third Budget Hearing (7:00 pm - 10:00 pm) Public Works Department and Non-Departmental Truth in Taxation Public Hearing First Reading of Proposed Budget Ordinance at Village Board Meeting Public Hearing 'and Second Reading of Proposed Budget Ordinance at Village Board Meeting Approved Budget available for distribution 2004 DATE 10/07/03 10/07/03 10/16/03 10/23/03 10/30/03 11/06/03 10/28/03 11/11/03 11/25/03 12/02/03 12/02/03 12/16/03 1/16/04 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT NEW SERVICE/PROJECT SUGGESTION FORM 2003 BUDGET Exhibit 4 Suggested by: New Service/Project Name: Description of New Service/Project: Estimated Cost (if known): Potential Source of Funds: Please return this form to the Village Manager by September 4, 2002. This area for the use of the Village Manager Assigned to the Department of: Comments: Signature of the Village Manager VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT General Fund Budget Comparison Revenues Expenditures Deficit Beginning Fund Balance (1/1/03) Ending Fund Balance (12/31/03) Fund Balance as Percent of Expenditures Calendar Year 2003 Adopted Current Budqet Estimate Variance 29,221,405 28,431,060 {790,345) 30,023,428 29,837,148 (186,280) (802,023) (1,406,088) (604,065) 9,449,924 9,449,924 8,647,901 8,043,836 (604,065) 26.0% 24.9% Notes: 1) Fund balance used for 1/1/03 is final audited figure from 2002 CAFR. Exhibit 5 Adopted versus Current Budget - Changes in Fund Balance Exhibit 6 December 31, Beginning Fund Balance VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT General Fund - Fund Balance History '1999 - 2004 Revenues Expenditures Adjusted Ending Fund Balance 1999 6,356,327 26,440,459 26,710,212 6,083,090 2000 6,083,090 28,127,634 26,831,436 8,777,204 2001 8,777,204 28,081,036 28,118,933 9,448,697 2002 9,448,697 28,094,144 28,092,917 9,449,924 2003 (est) 9,449,924 28,431,060 29,837,148 8,043,836 2004 (est) ~ 8,043,836 31,436,655 32,277,628 7,202,863 Fund Balance as % of Expenditures 22.7% 31.2% 33.6% 31.7% 24.9% 21.7% Note: 1) Fund balance as percent of expenditures for 2004 was based on the assumption that expenditures increase by 3% for the CY 2005 budget. Fund Balance History Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DATE: AUGUST 8, 2003 SUBJECT: BRANDING -VILLAGE LOGO/WEB SITE REDESIGN In 1999, the Community Development Department embarked on a corridor design project. One of the products of those efforts was a logo, commonly referred to as "the keystone" (Exhibit A). This symbol was to be used in the corridor design projects throughout the Village - on wall installments, signs, banners, etc. Over the past few years, some Village departments have incorporated this design into their clothing and vehicle graphics. In an effort to coordinate and control use of the keystone symbol and other Village sYmbols, we are seeking direction from the Village Board on the overlying "branding" issue. It has been suggested a number of times that the Village undertake a "branding" effort. Branding can be used to convey a desired image to business and the public through use of Iogos and graphics that reflect a unified theme or message. Under this theory, Village materials would have a consistent look - from the newsletter to the web site, publications, vehicles, uniforms, street signs, etc. Is this a direction the Board would like to pursue? · To what extent? · What guidelines do we need to establish for use of the logo? To assist in this discussion, please find attached the City of Evanston's Graphics Usage Policy (Exhibit B). In addition, I am submitting for consideration a revised version of the keystone logo for use in the Village newsletter and redesigned web site (Exhibit C). Finally, also for the Board's consideration, please find two sample versions of a home page redesign for the Village's web site (Exhibits D1 & D2). We would like for the Board to review these options and comment on various elements of the designs including the following: randing - Village LogoNVeb Site Redesign Page 2 August 8, 2003 · Do you prefer the photos in Sample 1 or the icons in Sample 2 (keep in mind these are not the photos that will be used - these are only for sample purposes and are changeable i.e. seasonal, etc.)? · Do you prefer the pull down menus in Sample 1 or the highlighted menus in Sample 2? · Where the intro would be located on the home page. · The "latest news" scrolling box. · Color scheme. Thank you for your consideration on these matters. I look forward do discussing these issues further with you. Maura Jandl'Fs Public Information Officer c: Assistant Village Manager Dave Strahl Exhibit A City of Evanston TM About the logo The lighthouse provides a readily identifiable and appropriate symbol for Evanston, it depicts the physical aspects of the city -- lakefront, tree city, residential, centers of business, educa- tion and historical architecture. The intangible aspects of the city are also represented. The diversity and welcoming environment are depicted by the rainbow-like arch emanating from the lighthouse. That arch can also be interpreted as a protective beam of light surrounding the city. The water opening up at the city's edge also works to convey a welcoming feeling. The graphic treatment using dark and light areas, as well as the overall modern and unique shape help to portray a delicate harmony between progress and tradition. © 200t City of Evanston ~-. Brand Identity Usage Policy 1. Intent. The City Logo should always be used in a manner consistent with the values and mission of the City of Evanston. Its purpose is to serve as a readily identifiable symbol of the City of Evanston. It does not replace the City Seal, but serves as a less formal, alternative mark. 2. Source. Because most external and internal documents are created electronically, employees should use the electronic version by importing the EPS file of the City Logo into a graphic box. Do not "stretch" or distort the logo to fit the shape of the graphic box. The Primary Configuration named COE_Cpos_542.eps is the preferred logo; however, pmultiple versions in horizontal and vertical formats are available. All logos can be found on the P: drive of the City's network at P:\City Logo. This file also includes memorandum templates featuring the City Logo. 3. Reproduction Quality. The City Logo must be digitally imprinted onto an item from the electronic file. "Copies of copies" should be avoided whenever possible m retain image sharpness, particularly on items that are widely distributed or circulated outside of the organization. No hand-drawn reproductions of the logo may be used. 4. Non-Paper Use. Whenever the City Logo is imprinted onto a non-paper item (i.e. banners, pens, binders, clothing, etc), those other uses must have prior written consent of the City Manager's Office. An e-mailed request m the City Manager's designee will suffice. 5. Trademark Protection. The City of Evanston has designated this mark as its official logo and has sought federal trademark protection. As such, external parties may only use it with the prior written consent of the City Manager's Office. Violations of usage standards by inter- nal or external parties may constitute infringement of the City's rights. 6. Treatment. The City Logo may not be altered or added to in any way that deviates from the standards manual. It may not be superimposed upon or be tangent to any other symbol, nor may any other symbol be superimposed upon or be tangent m the City Logo. 7. Printed Form Orders. Orders for all printed forms (i.e. stationery, business cards, applications, etc.) bearing the City Logo are to be placed through the City's Purchasing Division. Templates are available to simplify this process and to stan- dardize the appearance of City forms. 8. Miscellaneous. For any question that may not be covered by the foregoing usage r~les, please refer to the City Manager's Office. Variations of the provisions of this standards policy, or use of the City Logo in any manner not covered in this policy, or variations in form, color or presentation of the City Logo not provided for in this policy, must be approved by the City Manager's Office. City of Evanston © 2001 Brand Identity Logomark Primary Configuration -- Centered Version E City of vanston TM In all instances, the City of Evanston logomark should be treated as a unit. The symbol and logotype should not be used independently. Two logomark configurations are acceptable for use in the various materials produced by the City of Evanston. The primary logomark is the centered version and should be used whenever possible. However, if space dictates the horizontal logomark can be used. This system allows for optimal placement and visibility, and aides in the mainte- nance of the brand identity for the City of Evanston. Secondary Configuration -- Horizontal Version City of EvanstonTM Division Configuration -- Centered and Horizontal Versions E City of vanston" Purchasing/Accounts Payable Division City of vanstonTM Purchasing/Accounts Payable Oivision City of Evanston © 2001 Brand Identity Signatures Primary Configuration -- Centered Version F~ city of Jvanston- 2100 Ridge Avenue Evanston, Illinois 60201 T 847.866.2936 F 847.448.8063 www. dtyofevanston.org F_ city of Jvanston- Purchasing/Accounts Payable Division 2100 Ridge Avenue Evanston, Illinois 60201 T 847.866.2936 F 847.448.8063 www. cityofevanston.org www. cityofevanston.org Secondary Configuration -- Flush LeI~ Version City of EvanstonTM 2100 Ridge Avenue T 847.866.2936 Evanston, Illinois 60201 F 847.448.8063 www.cityofevanston.org A signature identifies the originator (sender) of a communication, product or seruice. A signature must be prominently displayed on all materials. Logomark and signature reproductions are provided within these electronic logosheets and should be used at all times when creating printed materials for the City of Evanston. The logo should never be added to or altered in any way. Address Block Address blocks are used as an integral part of the signature when needed. The address block is copy which enables the recipient of a communi- cation to respond to the sender. An address block should be used only when a response may be necessary or required. The address block does not have to be a part of the signature. No copy within an address block may be given special emphasis by g~ze, weight, or sparing. All information within the address block should be spelled out, not abbreviated. City of hvanston Purchasing/Accounts T 847.866.2936 Payable Division F 847.448.8063 2100 Ridge Avenue purchasing@cityofevanston.org Evanston, Illinois 60201 www.cityofevanston.org City of Evanston © 2001 Brand Identity Color PM$ 542 -- Evanston Blue Bbck PantoneTM Matching System (PMS) colors 542 and Black are the standard colors for the City of Evanston brand identity system. These PMS colors may be converted into process color matches. The process match for PMS 542 is 69% cyan, 18.5% magenta, 0% yellow and 23.5% black. The RGB match for PMS 542 is 45% red, 134% green and 179% blue. The Hexadecmial match for PMS 542 is 2D86B3. City of Evanston © 2001 Brand Identity Logomark Color Options Primary Color Option City of Evanston- Acceptable One Color Options E City of vanston TM City of Lvanston- Reverse Reproduction Whenever possible the logo should appear in PMS 542 and black. The entire logo is printed in black, with the exception of the water waves and sky which are printed in PMS 542. The sky is printed in a 25% screen of PMS 542. Any other color combination is unacceptable. When colors are limited the logo- mark may be printed in black. The logo can be used as a solid black without any screens, or with a screen of gray in the sky and water waves as shown, When colors are limited the logo- mark may be also printed in a single color. When this is the case, no screens should be used. The primary single color logo color is black. The log°mark may be reversed to white, within any background that provides sufficient contrast. Sufficient contrast can be defined as a color or screened percentage of a color that is dark enough to hold enough contrast for a white logo- mark. Generally a screen of 50% or more is sufficient. However, this rule would not apply to lighter value colors such as pastels. City of Evanston © 2001 Exhibit C Exhibit D1 Village of Mouni Prosieit Welcome to the Village of Mou, t Prospect ....... I00 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect. IL 60056 , P~cne: 847.392-6000 GOVERtIHEIiTSERVICES VISITORS 'COHHUHI~' BUSINESS:" Exhibit D2 GOVERNMENT MaYor arid city COuncil, me~ing ag~qdas and mtnutes, SERVICES Fire Department, Police Departm~t, Public Works and more~ COMMUNITY Links to ar~a businesses and c~-nmunity demographics, VI*LLAGE NEWS Village NewsJettefs, meetings, and events, Villa6e ot Mmm, Pr°spec{ Located 22 miles from downtown Chicago and just minutes from both O'Hare International Airpo~, the woHd's busiest, and Ehe much smaller Pal~aukee Airpo~ ~hich services many corporate and private aircraft. Established as a farming community soon a~er The Great Chicago Fi~e and incorporated in 1917, ~ount Prosped is currently home to over 56,265 residents as ~ell as severat m~jor corporafiong. Logo/Web Site Presentation What is "BRANDING"? · Convey a desired image to business and the public through use of Iogos and graphics that reflect a unified theme or message. · Materials have consistent look Committee of the WT;ole Meeting- 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Corridor Design Guidelines Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Corridor Design Guidelines Committee of the Who]e Meeting - 08/~2/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation ':~?~'~ ~'o,~~,,,~.~o,~. ~..~,,,,~o~..?,,-~' Committee of the Whole Meeting- 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Economic Development Committee of the Whole Meeting- 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Economic Development Committee of the Whole Meeting- 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Logo Design pVjl~.ge of Mouht rospect OS~Ct Villagc of ~ Mount Prospect Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Logo Design Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/f2/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Logo Design Committee of tho Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Pub#cations }~ MOUN'[' PROSPE(71' AT A GIrANCE ~t~ HISrI'ORY OF MOUNT PROSPEC'. I ~ I'HINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW VILLAGE GOVERNMENT Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Pub#cations NewsleUer Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Web Site - Version I Welcome to the ¥illage o[ Mount Prospect Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Web Site - Version 2 Welcome ~o Commiltee of the Whole Meeb*ng - 08/f2/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation What would be involved? · Newsletter · Web Site · Letterhead/Stationery · Uniforms · Vehicles Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Fire Department Committee of the Whole Meeting - 0~/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Police Department Logo/Web Site Presentation Public Works Committee of the Whole Meeting - 08/12/03 Logo/Web Site Presentation Community Development/Finance Logo/Web Site Presentation Example from St. Charles, Illinois lO Mount Prospect Public Works Department I 700 W. CenCret Road, Mount Prospect, IlIinoia 600~56-~22E) Phone 847/87D-5640 Paul C. ~]ures Fax 847/253-9377 TDO 847/3@E~-1235 N_[:3 T I CE THE ALJGU..,CT 1 l~ ~-1::303 MEETING OF THE ¢:AFETY crI'MIv~ISSIrlN HAS BEEN CANCELLED;' THE NEXT'REGuLAR MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR M~NDAY~ SEPTEMBER S, 201:33 AT ?=r'lO P.NI. AN AGENDA DR I~AN~.ELLATION NOTIC'E WILL BE'SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. DATED THIS 21~TM DAY DF ,lUCY, 2003, Recycled Paper - Print. Ad w~h Soy Ink · : ,, · .... , . ..' ?;,~. ! · · ,~...~...:.. MAYOR G~ald L. Farley TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele W. Skowron Irvana K. Wilks Michael A. Zadel Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Velma W. Lowe Phone: 847/818-5328 Fax: 847/818-5329 TDD: 847/392-6064 NOTICE THE THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 2003 MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION HAS BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING. C:~I~ocumems ~ad S ettings\KDewis DO MAIN~Local Settings\Temporary Iht ernet F/Ies\OLK2\C ancel.doc