Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. New Business 07/19/2011 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT NEIGHBOROOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM AND AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS, REQUIRING AN EXTRAORDINARY VOTE FOR RESIDENT-INITIATED TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECTS WHEREAS , the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect are committed to the safety of WHEREAS , a Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program has been developed to incorporate education, enforcement and engineering solutions to the traffic issues that exist within those neighborhoods; and WHEREAS , the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that it is in the best interests of its residents to adopt the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, PURSUANT TO ITS HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION 1: The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, is hereby adopted. SECTION 2: Subsection C(5) of Section 2.201Conduct of Business, of Article II, Rules of Order, of Chapter 2 of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended by inserting a new Sub- i. To approve a resident-initiated Neighborhood Traffic Calming traffic calming project that is not Program, Ordinance # ______ supported by majority vote of residents in the Project Area SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: ________________________________________________________________ NAYS: ________________________________________________________________ ABSENT: _____________________________________________________________ PASSED and APPROVED this ____ day of _________, 2011. ___________________________ Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: ______________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk 2/3013¦3 EXHIBIT A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT NEIGHBOROOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM  2/3013¦3 �µ Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Village of Mount Prospect Engineering Division Approved by Village Board of Trustees: Last Updated: Village of Mount Prospect Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program C7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................... ............................... ....... 1 ................. Goals.......................................................................... ............................... 2 Policy Statements ResidentialFocus .................................................. ............................... 3 Education and Enforcement ...................................... ............................... 3 MinimumCriteria ................................................. ............................... 4 ProjectAreas ....................................................... ............................... 4 Resident and Village Initiated Processes ....................... ............................... 5 Project Prioritization .............................................. ............................... 5 Traffic Calming Measures ....................................... ............................... 6 EmergencyResponse ............................................. ............................... 7 Maintenance........................................................ ............................... 8 Funding............................................................. ............................... 8 Removal............................................................ ............................... 8 Traffic Calming Process .................................................... ............................... 10 Resources..................................................................... ............................... 14 Appendix A — Process Flowchart Appendix B — Minimum Criteria Appendix C — Petition Form Appendix D — Project Prioritization Worksheet Appendix E — Traffic Calming Toolbox Appendix F — Primary Emergency Vehicle Response Route Map Village of Mount Prospect '.Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program �7 INTRODUCTION Traffic conditions on residential streets can greatly affect neighborhood livability. Residents have an expectation that their streets will be safe and pleasant. When they perceive this to be the case, the quality of life is enhanced. However, when the negative issues that can be associated with traffic intrude into their neighborhoods, residents' sense of community and personal well -being are diminished. Concerns of excessive speeding, cut - through traffic and pedestrian safety in neighborhoods are often expressed by residents to the Village. A belief in a diminished quality of life and feeling of safety by residents as a result of the unwelcome traffic press the Village to provide solutions. The Village of Mount Prospect's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program incorporates education, enforcement and engineering solutions to the traffic issues that exist within our neighborhoods. It builds upon the recently completed Neighborhood Traffic Study that has resulted in a consistent pattern of intersection traffic control and speed limits to enhance driver expectation and safety. The Institute of Transportation Engineers defines traffic calming as "the combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and improve conditions for non - motorized street users." Using this definition as a framework, the program will provide a process to develop appropriate solutions and will include the cooperative efforts of Village Staff, elected officials, residents, business owners and road users to achieve our desired goals. Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program MR A ME GOALS The goals of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program are: • Enhance neighborhood safety and livability by reducing excessive speeding and traffic volumes on residential streets. • Encourage reasonable and responsible driver behavior through education and enforcement. • Leverage the data collected from the Neighborhood Traffic Study so that traffic calming projects can be pursued via either a resident - driven or Village- initiated process. • Promote and enhance safety for bicycle and pedestrian travel. • Foster a collaborative working relationship between Village Staff, elected officials, residents, business owners and road users in the development of traffic calming projects. • Make efficient use of Village resources including personnel and funding by following the established process of evaluating and prioritizing traffic calming requests. Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 3 POLICY STATEMENTS Residential Focus The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program is focused on residential areas since a goal is to enhance neighborhood safety and livability. Only local residential and collector streets will be considered in this program. Arterial streets are specifically excluded from this program because the nature of arterial streets is to move large numbers of vehicles in a relatively free - flowing manner. Non - neighborhood traffic is encouraged to use arterial streets in order to reduce cut - through traffic in the neighborhoods. It is recognized, however, that vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian issues exist on arterial streets. Other means and resources outside the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program will be explored to address these issues. Neighborhood participation is important in order to develop a consensus of the issues that adversely affect the neighborhood, evaluate the pros and cons of the various traffic calming measures, and ensure that the issues are adequately addressed. It is essential to consider a wide range of perspectives and observations in addition to engineering data. The program is designed so that residents can become actively involved in defining the problem(s) and in the decision - making process in order to have a sense of ownership in the outcome. In addition to neighborhood participation, it is important that the process reflects the opinions of a majority of the residents and not just a few vocal residents. This is implemented through the use of a petition that must be signed by at least 51% of the properties along the qualifying street to initiate the traffic calming process. The limits of the petition area will be determined by the Engineering Division. Within the established Project Area, at the end of the process, a final vote requiring a favorable response of a least 66% of the properties on a street is required to implement traffic calming measures on that particular street. This is further explained in the Traffic Calming Process section as well as the flowchart located in Appendix A. • Traffic calming measures will only be considered on local residential and collector streets. • Residents and business owners will be encouraged to participate in the identification of the traffic issues as well as development of the solution. • Traffic calming projects will require a positive response from at least 51% of the properties along the qualifying street to initiate the process and 66% of the properties along a street within the Project Area to support installation of traffic calming measures. Education and Enforcement Traffic calming measures physically alter the roadway and are considered permanent changes that will impact the behavior of motorists. These dramatic changes should only be considered after consideration of less costly options. Education provides the opportunity for the Engineering Division and Police Department to communicate their perspective to residents. The advantages and disadvantages of traffic calming measures, the purpose of traffic control devices (stop and yield signs), and the true extent of a problem based on collected data can be shared with residents to make them better informed. This can be accomplished through telephone conversations, neighborhood meetings, open houses, brochures, the Village web site and newspaper media. In addition, employing education tools will allow residents to get involved in easing traffic concerns. One example is the placement of yard signs (Keep Kids Alive — Drive 25 campaign) in neighborhoods by residents in collaboration with the Police Department. Enforcement relies on the Police Department to be a presence in neighborhoods and enforce existing speed limit and traffic control ordinances. In addition to selective enforcement, the Police Department also will utilize the speed display trailer and drone vehicles to ease traffic concerns. Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Inexpensive engineering measures such as additional signage, striping and pavement markings will also be considered before approving traffic calming measures. Education, enforcement and inexpensive engineering solutions are to be considered prior to approval of any traffic calming measures. Minimum Criteria The Village receives requests on a regular basis for traffic calming measures. The primary complaints involve speeding vehicles or a high volume of vehicles relative to the street type. The extent of a problem on one street will be different than another street. Therefore, it is important to develop thresholds for streets to qualify for traffic calming measures. Otherwise, traffic calming measures could be installed on streets where there would be minimal effect on traffic speed and volume. Not only would this set a precedent to permit traffic calming measures on every neighborhood street, it would have a negative impact on efficiently using Staff resources and Village expenditures. Since traffic calming measures directly impact vehicular speed and volume, minimum speed or volume criteria will need to be met in order for a Project Area to qualify for traffic calming measures and begin the petition process. The only exception will be if the street has a recent history of crashes atypical for a neighborhood street and traffic calming measures would be the appropriate solution. The specifics of the minimum criteria are explained in Appendix B. + In order for a street to qualify for traffic calming measures and begin the petition process, minimum traffic volume or speed criteria are to be met. Project Areas The Village was segmented into eighteen (18) neighborhood zones as part of the Neighborhood Traffic Study, a program that reviewed the traffic control at all neighborhood intersections and speed limits on all neighborhood streets. Each neighborhood was reviewed as a whole rather than analyzing each intersection or street independently. By having a big picture focus, the Village was able to consider the potential impact throughout the neighborhood. And a product of the study was the collection of extensive vehicular volume and speed, pedestrian and intersection data. Both the traffic data collected from and approach to the Neighborhood Traffic Study are key aspects of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. The traffic data collected from the Neighborhood Traffic Study will serve as the primary source to be able to identify streets with traffic conditions above the norm and that qualify for traffic calming measures. This will allow the Engineering Division to streamline the process by not having to always perform an initial traffic study. The type and level of the issue(s) can be assessed and a Project Area more quickly created. Further, potential traffic calming measures can begin to be discussed based on the traffic data and street characteristics. It will also be important to keep in mind that traffic calming measures on one street can have an impact on surrounding streets. A noticeable increase in vehicular volume or speed on an adjacent street may arise when the street in question is the sole focus of a project. In developing a solution for one traffic problem, it is important not to shift the problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood. Neighborhood street classifications and their respective functions are to be maintained. In an effort to address this concern, the Engineering Division will create a Project Area after a petition is received for traffic calming measures on a particular street. The boundaries of the Project Area will be the limits of potential significant impact should construction of traffic calming measures take place on the qualifying street. In some cases the Project Area will be limited to the qualifying street in question whereas in other cases it will include adjacent streets. Adjacent streets within the Project Area may or Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program \ �L ) / 5 may not meet the criteria for traffic calming measures when evaluated independently, and may or may not receive approval for traffic calming measures, but may be considered in the development of a project should the Engineering Division believe traffic calming measures on the qualifying street in question will significantly impact traffic conditions on other streets in the neighborhood. A Project Area, therefore, does not necessarily include the entire neighborhood allowing for the possibility of multiple Project Areas within a neighborhood. • The traffic data collected from the Neighborhood Traffic Study will serve as the primary source to identify streets that qualify for traffic calming measures. • The type and level of the traffic issue(s) along with the street characteristics will help determine the appropriate traffic calming measures. • Traffic calming projects are intended to minimize diverted traffic to other local residential or collector streets. • A Project Area, the limits of potential significant impact should construction of traffic calming measures take place on the qualifying street, will be created for each potential traffic calming project. Resident and Village Initiated Processes Residential streets with traffic conditions above the norm are not necessarily considered hazardous where traffic calming measures are required. In many cases, residents may consider traffic calming measures too intrusive and would prefer impermanent solutions such as enforcement and education. There is not always the need to aggressively respond to traffic data when to residents the current conditions do not significantly affect their livability. Two processes, therefore, have been developed for the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. The resident - initiated process allows the neighborhood to reach out to the Village when it believes conditions have reached a level for pursuing traffic calming measures. This process provides a sense of ownership to improve the livability in the neighborhood. Once this process is initiated, the Village will partner with residents to develop a traffic calming project. The petition form to initiate the process is located in Appendix C. The Village- initiated process allows the Engineering Division to pursue traffic calming measures when a hazardous condition is clearly evident. A high crash rate, recorded speeds well above a typical residential street, and recorded volumes excessive for the street classification are examples. The process will permit the Engineering Division to bypass the petition process but still allows for resident involvement in the plan development phase. Resident - initiated and Village- initiated processes have been developed to pursue traffic calming projects. Project Prioritization The need to prioritize projects arises when the demand for traffic calming measures exceeds Village resources. This includes Village Staff time to work on a project as well as construction funding. A common approach to efficiently utilize Village resources is to prioritize projects so that neighborhoods with the greater problems are addressed first. Since most neighborhood traffic problems involve speeding vehicles or a high volume of vehicles relative to the street type, these are the first factors taken into consideration. Another factor that will be considered in defining the extent of the problem is the recent crash history along the street. In addition, the amount of pedestrian activity within the neighborhood will be taken into account. Neighborhoods that have a higher number of pedestrian generators such as parks and schools will be impacted greater than those neighborhoods without pedestrian generators. Due to the high concentration of school -aged pedestrians and localized traffic congestion associated with elementary, middle and high schools, these pedestrian generators are weighted double that of other non - school Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 6 pedestrian generators. And a final factor to be considered is the presence (or lack) of sidewalk. In neighborhoods without sidewalk, pedestrians are in greater conflict with vehicles than in neighborhoods with sidewalk. Should the Village receive multiple requests for traffic calming projects, the Engineering Division will prioritize them utilizing the Project Prioritization Worksheet located in Appendix D. The one street within the Project Area that receives the most points will represent the Project Area during the prioritization review. * Traffic calming studies will be prioritized based on the extent of the problem. Traffic Calming Measures There are a few basic categories of traffic calming measures. Each one can have a different effect on motorists as well as bicyclists and pedestrians. It is, therefore, important to understand how each traffic calming measure functions and the primary traffic issue each that one is intended to address. The library or "toolbox" of traffic calming measures will provide the Engineering Division with a number of alternatives when developing a project. The identified traffic issue(s), collected traffic data, street classification, street geometrics, adjacent land use and cost are some of the factors that will be considered to determine the appropriate traffic calming measure(s) for each project. Brief descriptions of the different types of traffic calming measures are provided here. The toolbox is located in Appendix E and provides detailed descriptions of each of the traffic calming measures. Horizontal deflection measures include traffic circles and chicanes. Constriction measures include choke points and midblock medians. These measures slow traffic by physically forcing motorists to maneuver around the measures. The use of landscaping within these devices not only enhance the aesthetics of the streetscape but also can break up the motorist's line of sight thereby reducing the comfortable speed of travel. When used in conjunction with one another, these measures are effective for a longer stretch of roadway rather than just in the immediate vicinity of the measure. These measures also tend to have relatively lower impacts on emergency vehicles. However, use of these measures usually requires prohibition of on- street parking adjacent to the measure. Horizontal deflection measures and constriction measures such as traffic circles, chicanes, choke points and midblock medians are acceptable traffic calming measures. Vertical deflection measures include speed humps, speed tables and raised crosswalks. These measures slow traffic by physically forcing motorists to maneuver over the measures. They are typically 14 to 22 feet long and 3 to 4 inches high. In order to be effective for a long stretch of roadway, they must be installed every 250 -400 feet. Otherwise, many motorists will speed between measures in order to "make up for lost time ". Speed humps can also have a negative impact on emergency vehicle response time as well as maintenance activities such as snow plowing and street sweeping. Their use can also redistribute traffic in a neighborhood as motorists may choose alternate routes to avoid them. For these reasons, vertical deflection measures are to be limited in their application. Their use is to address defined speeding problems and should only be considered when other traffic calming measures may not provide effective results. Primary emergency vehicle response routes and collector streets are not eligible for vertical deflection measures. This is because it is not only imperative that emergency vehicles not be hindered while responding to an emergency but just as important that the outcome not result in a significant redistribution of traffic within a neighborhood. To this end, adjacent streets may be included in a Project Area should vertical deflection measures be considered for a local street. Traffic calming measures may or may not be installed on adjacent streets but it is important to consider their potential impact during the process. Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program T7 Vertical deflection measures such as speed humps, speed tables and raised crosswalks are acceptable traffic calming measures in limited applications. Pedestrian safety measures include curb extensions and pedestrian refuges. These measures are usually installed near high pedestrian areas such as schools and parks. The primary purpose of these measures is to make it safer for pedestrians to cross the street. Curb extensions narrow the street at a key crossing point minimizing the distance and time a pedestrian is in the street. Pedestrian refuges provide a place of safety for pedestrians along the center of the street allowing them to cross one direction at a time. A secondary benefit of these measures is that they can slow traffic as vehicles pass the measure. Pedestrian safety measures such as curb extensions and pedestrian refuges are acceptable traffic calming measures. Volume reducing measures include diverters, intersection median barriers, street closures and turn restrictions. These measures alter the existing transportation circulation system. As a result, these measures can have impacts that would need to be evaluated in greater scope than just along one particular street. While they can be a viable solution to a street problem, it is important not to shift the problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood. Volume reducing measures such as diverters, intersection median barriers, street closures and turn restrictions are acceptable traffic calming measures if it can be verified through quantitative analysis that a substantial amount of cut through traffic is evident. However, they should be evaluated as part of an area -wide study if their use is to be considered. Stop signs are not traffic calming measures. Residents, however, often request stop signs in an effort to calm traffic. Although residents believe that stop signs will reduce vehicular speeds, traffic studies have shown there is little difference with vehicular speeds at the midblock whether there is or is not a stop sign at the adjacent intersection. In some cases, vehicular speeds after the vehicle has passed through the stop controlled intersection have shown to be higher than without a stop sign as motorists try to "make up for lost time" after the stop sign. Inappropriate use of stop signs can also create significant negative impact to emergency vehicles. Emergency vehicles are required to verify that a stop controlled intersection is clear of vehicles prior to entering. Many times this means that the emergency vehicle must nearly come to a stop. Stop signs are traffic control devices that should be used when appropriate to assign right -of -way to conflicting traffic movements, not to calm traffic. Stop signs should be installed only at locations where conditions meet criteria established in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Unwarranted stop signs can have a high violation rate, create disrespect at other stop controlled intersections and create a false sense of security for other road users and pedestrians. + Unwarranted stop signs are not to be used as part of the program. Emergency Response A critical concern about the use of traffic calming measures is the delay they may create for fire engines, ambulances and law enforcement vehicles. It is important to be aware of the trade -offs when making decisions about the use of traffic calming devices. The more aggressive measures for slowing traffic will slow emergency response as well. Recognizing the importance of emergency response time, all traffic calming measures will be designed to minimize the impact on emergency vehicles. Since many collector streets are considered primary Village of Mount Prospect M Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 8 emergency vehicle response routes, particular attention must be paid to the types of measures used on collector streets. Measures that considerably interfere with emergency vehicle operations on collector streets or other primary emergency vehicle response routes will not be allowed. A map identifying the Village's primary emergency vehicle response routes is located in Appendix F. • Traffic calming measures shall be designed to minimize the impact on emergency vehicle response times. • Traffic calming measures shall be limited on primary emergency vehicle response routes. • The Fire Department and Police Department shall be involved in the process and be given the opportunity to provide input prior to approval of any traffic calming measures. Maintenance Many traffic calming measures alter the geometry of the roadway. Poorly designed measures could interfere with maintenance activities such as street sweeping, leaf pick -up and snow plowing. This could have a negative effect on the appearance of the neighborhood and the residents' quality of life. • Traffic calming measures shall be designed to minimize the impact on maintenance activities such as street sweeping, leaf pick -up and snow plowing. • The Public Works Department shall be involved in the process and be given the opportunity to provide input prior to approval of any traffic calming measures. Funding The Village's Traffic Improvement Account will be the primary source to fund traffic calming projects. Grant resources such as Safe Route to Schools and the Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program will also be explored to offset Village costs. All costs associated with traffic calming projects will be paid for by the Village. Residents and businesses will not be required to directly share in the costs. Such funding is subject to availability. Administration costs including Village Staff time to collect and analyze data, prioritize requests, conduct neighborhood meetings, develop engineering drawings detailing the traffic calming measures, and perform any post- studies after construction will be covered under the normal operating budget and will not be the responsibility of residents or businesses to fund. If a project goes to construction, the Village will cover the costs of the bidding process, construction inspection and project management. All construction costs will also be paid for by the Village. Maintenance of the traffic calming measures will be necessary on a regular basis after construction. The Village will be responsible for maintenance such as replacing damaged signs, refreshing striping and pavement markings, pavement repair and landscaping. Maintenance of the traffic calming measures will be done at no direct cost to residents or businesses. Residents and business owners within a Project Area will not be required to directly fund any portion of a traffic calming project or future maintenance of such measures. All costs will be paid for by the Village. Removal Although there are many policies and steps incorporated in the program to avoid the scenario whereby a neighborhood requests to have traffic calming measures removed, it is acknowledged that this may occur. In order for consideration to remove traffic calming measures from an individual street or entire Project Area that were installed via the resident - initiated process, a petition must be submitted to the Village. If the request is for an individual street that did not originally qualify for traffic calming measures when Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 9 evaluated independently, the petition must be signed by at least 66% of the properties along the street in question. If the request is for an individual street that did originally qualify for traffic calming measures or is for an entire Project Area, the petition must be signed by at least 66% of the properties within the Project Area. A petition cannot be submitted for at least one year after installation of traffic calming measures in order to avoid a premature reaction to their effectiveness. Should the Village receive a petition, a neighborhood meeting will be held to discuss the issues and impacts of removal of the traffic calming measures. As part of the discussion, residents and businesses will be presented the latest traffic data to understand the effectiveness of the existing traffic calming measures. They will also be informed that any costs associated with removing the traffic calming measures will be paid for by the Village. The Village will then send a ballot to the affected properties within the Project Area detailing the removal request. If the request is for an individual street that did not originally qualify for traffic calming measures, ballots will only be sent to the properties along the street in question. If the request is for an individual street that did originally qualify for traffic calming measures or is for an entire Project Area, ballots will be sent to all properties within the Project Area. A deadline for return will be shown on the ballot. In order to proceed with removal of the traffic calming measures, a positive response from at least 66% of the properties involved must be received by the deadline. No response or a late response will be counted as opposition to the removal. Should there be sufficient support to remove the traffic calming measures, the Village Board of Trustees will be advised and requested to make a final decision based on a simple majority vote. Removal of the traffic calming measures will not take place unless the Village Board of Trustees approves the removal and until funds are allocated by the Village. Similar to the petition process, single family properties and single use properties such as schools, parks, churches, commercial businesses, etc. will count equally as a single vote. Each unit within small scale multi - family properties without a management company such as condominium complexes will also have a single vote. The same will be for small scale commercial properties. For large scale multi - family residential properties such as apartment complexes or large scale multi -unit commercial properties, the management company will decide and be allotted votes equaling the number of buildings on the property. For such large scale properties without a management company, each unit will be counted that proportion of the number of buildings divided by the number of total units on the property. For traffic calming measures installed via the Village- initiated process, only the Village can initiate the process for removal. Typically, the Village will initiate the removal process should the street be altered, adjacent land use change, or other situations arise where it is determined the traffic calming measures are no longer effective or necessary. A traffic study must support the recommendation to remove such traffic calming measures. After a neighborhood meeting, a survey will be sent to the Project Area soliciting feedback. Resident comments will be forwarded to the Village Board of Trustees and taken into account before they make a final decision based on a simple majority vote. • Traffic calming measures shall remain in -place for a minimum of one year before being considered for removal. • Removal of a traffic calming measure installed via the resident - initiated process shall require a positive response from at least 66% of the affected properties within the Project Area and approval by the Village Board of Trustees. • Removal of a traffic calming measure installed via the Village- initiated process shall only be initiated by the Village and must be approved by the Village Board of Trustees. Village of Mount Prospect �( 10 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program �� TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS Neighborhood Focus Most traffic calming programs in the country are set up to be reactive, resident - initiated. That is, a resident or group of residents petition the local government for traffic calming measures on a particular street and staff responds to the request. Typically, a process is in place to determine whether the street qualifies for traffic calming measures and if so what steps must be taken in order to receive approval. Two advantages to this approach are that 1) public interest has been generated early on in the process and 2) overstretched staffs' keep the project scope limited to the street in question. However, a major disadvantage to this approach is that solving one problem on a particular street may have repercussions on surrounding streets and throughout the neighborhood. That is why a new trend in traffic calming programs is emerging. The Neighborhood Traffic Study was established to review intersection traffic control and speed limits on a neighborhood -wide basis. This comprehensive approach was created to assure that consistent decisions would be made and the neighborhood as a whole would operate safely. And based on the results of our post- studies, this neighborhood -wide approach is achieving our goal of improving safety. Along this same line of thinking, the Village supports a traffic calming program that involves an area -wide approach to best serve the community. Similar to installing a stop sign at one intersection without giving thought to the impact on the adjacent intersection, constructing traffic calming measures on one street without considering the impact on the adjacent street(s) may create new problems. Initial Work As part of the Neighborhood Traffic Study, eighteen (18) neighborhood zones were created to manage the study and implementation phases. After implementing the approved sign changes, post- studies were then performed to determine the effects on the neighborhoods. With the post- studies, the Engineering Division has been able to collect extensive vehicular volume and speed data including average daily traffic, peak hour volume, average speeds and 85 percentile speeds on the neighborhood streets. It is from this data that we have been able to identify streets that experience traffic conditions above the norm. One of the first steps in the development of this traffic calming process involved the Engineering Division's review of the post -study data on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis in order to identify individual streets that would qualify for traffic calming based on the established minimum criteria. Maps for each neighborhood zone highlighting those streets that currently qualify for traffic calming have been developed based on the post -study vehicular volume and speed data. These maps will be continually updated to reflect the most current information as additional traffic studies are performed and more data gathered in the future. Resident - Initiated Process Establishing minimum criteria and identifying streets that qualify for traffic calming allows the program to focus on the most problematic streets. When the Village receives a traffic complaint and traffic calming maybe a solution, the first step will be to determine whether the street in question qualifies for traffic calming. If the Engineering Division believes updated traffic data is necessary then it will be collected and compared to the established guidelines. Otherwise, the Engineering Division will rely on the latest post -study data gathered during the Neighborhood Traffic Study. If the street does not qualify for traffic calming, the Engineering Division will consider less intrusive solutions such as: • education resources • selective speed limit / intersection traffic control enforcement Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program • use of the speed display trailer • use of a Police Department drone vehicle • improving sight distance at intersections • appropriate additional signing, striping or pavement markings The resident or group will then be notified and the issue referred to the Police Department. Similar to current practice, the Police Department will schedule an enforcement period as time permits. This will not only include actual speed limit or stop sign enforcement but use of the speed display trailer and a drone vehicle to improve compliance of the traffic regulations. Education tools such as Keep Kids Alive — Drive 25 signs and on -site conversations with residents are other options that will continue to be offered. And as technology further develops, additional measures may be considered by the Police Department. Should the street meet any of the established criterions for traffic calming, the Engineering Division will then determine whether there is support from the neighborhood to consider a traffic calming project. This will be done through a petition form provided by the Village. The petition form will provide space for residents to describe their traffic concerns and obtain signatures. One advantage to this step is that getting public support early in the process should help the Village to work with the neighborhood to address its concerns. Another advantage is that the traffic concerns described in the petition will help the Engineering Division determine the appropriate traffic calming measure(s). If the petition is returned to the Village with signatures from at least 51% of the properties along the street, the Village will then determine a timetable for formal review. Single family properties and single use properties such as schools, parks, churches, commercial businesses, etc. will count as one (1). Each unit within small scale multi - family properties without a management company such as condominium complexes will also count as one (1) as will small scale commercial properties. For large scale multi- family residential properties such as apartment complexes or large scale multi -unit commercial properties, only the management company can sign the petition with its signature counted as being equivalent to the number of buildings on the property. For such large scale properties without a management company, each unit can sign the petition with the signature to be counted that proportion of the number of buildings divided by the number of total units on the property. If there are multiple petitions received by the Village for different streets, they will be prioritized based on the severity of the issue. Each year, the top projects on the priority list will be selected for study that year, depending upon the availability of funding. When it is time to begin plan preparation, the Engineering Division will first create a Project Area around the qualifying street in question. The boundaries will depend on the location of the qualifying street, its characteristics, and the type and level of the traffic issue(s). Once a Project Area has been created, the Engineering Division will take reasonable steps to notify those properties within the area that preliminary plans are being prepared at the request of the neighborhood. This will include sending a notification to persons who own property within the Project Area but may not live within the area. Should the Project Area include adjacent streets beyond the qualifying street in question, the notification will be sent to all affected properties including those on the adjacent streets. The notification will explain the process to be followed by Staff. It will also include a list of traffic calming measures being considered by the Engineering Division to address the identified traffic issues. Residents will be given the opportunity to share their traffic concerns with the Engineering Division and choose their preferred traffic calming measure(s) via e-mail, regular mail or the telephone. The notification will also indicate the planned Transportation Safety Commission Meeting date and refer residents to a project web page on the Village web site to keep the public apprised of the project's progress. And lastly, residents will be given the opportunity to provide the Village an e-mail address that can be used for future correspondence. This will allow the Engineering Division to stay in close contact with those most interested in the project and to minimize the number of mailings resulting in a more efficient and economical process. Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 1' 12 The Engineering Division will next prepare preliminary plans for the Project Area. Resident and property owner feedback will be taken into account during plan development. Village departments including Police, Fire and Public Works will next review the plans and provide comments. The plans will then be refined based on the received comments. The recommended plan will then be presented to the Transportation Safety Commission at a regular meeting. Those residents within the Project Area who provided an e -mail address will be reminded of the meeting. The project web page will also be updated to allow residents to view the recommended plan as well as provide public notice of the meeting. The Village will present the recommended plan and residents will be given the opportunity to comment. The Transportation Safety Commission's objective will be to decide on the elements of a plan, not to decide on the need for traffic calming measures. The Commission will consider both the Engineering Division's proposal and comments from the public in order to make a recommendation that addresses the identified traffic issues. At the end of the meeting, the Transportation Safety Commission will either vote on a plan or direct the Engineering Division to make revisions and bring it back for further discussion at another meeting. At this stage, the goal is for the Engineering Division to satisfy the conditions of the Transportation Safety Commission and receive Commission support for a plan. Once this is achieved, the Engineering Division will mail a ballot to the properties along those streets within the Project Area that have recommended traffic calming measures included in the plan. A deadline for return will be shown on the ballot. No response or a late response will be counted as opposition to the plan. Should traffic calming measures be recommended on adjacent streets in addition to the qualifying street in question, each street will be tallied independent from one another. A favorable response of a least 66% of the properties on a street will be required to continue in the process to construct traffic calming measures on that particular street. This may result in streets being omitted from the project should they not achieve the minimum support required. However, if none of the qualifying streets within the Project Area satisfy the minimum support required then traffic calming measures will not be approved on any of the streets within the Project Area regardless of the results on the other streets. Similar to the petition process, single family properties and single use properties such as schools, parks, churches, commercial businesses, etc. will count equally as a single vote. Each unit within small scale multi - family properties without a management company such as condominium complexes will also have a single vote. The same will be for small scale commercial properties. For large scale multi - family residential properties such as apartment complexes or large scale multi -unit commercial properties, the management company will decide and be allotted votes equaling the number of buildings on the property. For such large scale properties without a management company, each unit's vote will be counted that proportion of the number of buildings divided by the number of total units on the property. The ballot mailing will also encourage residents to check the project web page for vote results and state the Village Board Meeting scheduled for Village Board consideration of the plan should the residents support a traffic calming project. Residents will once again be given the opportunity to provide the Village an e -mail address that can be used for future correspondence. If the plan is not supported by those within the Project Area, residents will be notified via e-mail and the project web page will be updated to show the vote results. Residents within the Project Area will then have a 30 -day period to file a request with the Village to have the plan forwarded to the Village Board of Trustees for a final decision. If a request is made within the timeframe and it is agreed the plan will be heard, an extraordinary vote as defined in the Village Code by the Village Board of Trustees will be required to approve the project. In addition, the Transportation Safety Commission can also decide to forward the plan to the Village Board of Trustees for a final decision. Again, an extraordinary vote by the Village Board of Trustees will be required to approve the project. Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 13 If the plan is not forwarded to the Village Board of Trustees, less intrusive education, enforcement and engineering measures as described earlier in this section will be considered in lieu of traffic calming measures. Another petition for traffic calming measures within the same Project Area cannot be submitted for at least one year after the original vote deadline. Further, the petition will require signatures from at least 66% of the properties along the qualifying street in order to begin the process again. Should the plan approved by the Transportation Safety Commission be supported by those within the Project Area, it will then be presented to the Village Board of Trustees. Again, those residents within the Project Area who provided an e -mail address will be notified of the meeting. The project web page will also be updated to show the vote results and provide public notice of the meeting. Once Village Staff presents the plan, the results of the vote, and any comments received from the public, the Village Board of Trustees may approve the plan by a simple majority vote, direct the Engineering Division to make revisions and bring it back for further discussion, deny the plan, or take such other action as it deems appropriate. Should a plan be approved, final construction drawings will be developed and the project will be scheduled for construction once funds are allocated by the Village. Any street within the Project Area that did not obtain enough resident support and acquire traffic calming measures cannot petition the Village again for at least one year after project completion. Such a petition will require signatures from at least 66% of the properties along the street in question in order to begin the process again. Should a plan ultimately be denied by the Village Board of Trustees, less intrusive education, enforcement and engineering measures will be considered as described earlier in this section. Another petition for traffic calming measures within the same Project Area cannot be submitted for at least one year after the Village Board of Trustees' decision. Such a petition will require signatures from at least 66% of the properties along the qualifying street in order to begin the process again. At such time the Engineering Division determines reasonable after completion of the project, a post -study will be performed to determine its effectiveness and to determine if any additional action is necessary. The findings will be included in a report to the Village Board of Trustees, Transportation Safety Commission and appropriate Staff. Interested residents within the Project Area will be notified via e-mail and the report will be posted on the project web page. As necessary, additional traffic studies may be performed to determine if the traffic calming measures continue to achieve the desired goals. Village- Initiated Process The process as explained above is resident - initiated coupled with a significant amount of up -front work performed by the Engineering Division. This allows the Village to regulate the number of potential projects while providing an avenue for residents to get involved early in the process. Doing this up -front work will also afford the Village the opportunity to identify a street that requires immediate attention. Factors including a high crash rate, recorded speeds well above a typical residential street, and recorded volumes excessive for the street classification may cause the Village to initiate a project rather than wait for resident interest. This may require greater effort in generating resident support at the beginning of the process but will be necessary if the Village identifies a hazardous condition. The course of action to be undertaken will be similar to the resident - initiated process but will be initiated by the Village rather than residents. One other difference is that the recommended plan or variation supported by the Transportation Safety Commission will still be presented to the Village Board of Trustees regardless of resident support. Rather than having a final resident vote, a survey will be sent to the Project Area soliciting feedback. Resident comments will be forwarded to the Village Board of Trustees for its consideration before a final decision. A simple majority vote by the Village Board of Trustees will be required to approve the project. NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS FLOWCHART RESIDENT - INITIATED PROJECT REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES PROVIDE PETITION FORM TO REQUESTOR TRAFFIC CONCERNS PUT IN WRITING HAS THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF NO SIGNATURES BEEN OBTAINED TO DEVELOP A TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN? YES CONSIDER NON- TRAFFIC CALMINC MEASURES EDUCATION RESOURCES SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT SPEED DISPLAY TRAILER POLICE DRONE VEHICLE IMPROVING SIGHT DISTANCE SIGNING & STRIPING 7R4kl'P LK 4T NN' S4FE7'F' :'N777C E -h1AIL REMINDFR'TO PROJECT AREA UPDATE WEB PAGE ON VILLAGE WEB SITE 'IR4�NYA')RF: {FR?N'S4FEIY CTMIMAY/(AVJ7FFl7frT; I.f15 {SNIT 77LI .NSA'Xff.I7fOtV:S1FEtM1'CCMRZ LNRFX7EUREV/ER STAFF PRESENTS RECOMMENDED PLAN SOLICIT INPUT FROM RESIDENTS REVIEW S C.8 RESIDENT' COMMENTS VOTE TO RECOMMEND PLAN REFINE PLAN AS NECESSARY iIDY®` ff 417 LNG PERIOD R-DAS" PERIOD TO REQUEST V. B DECISION STAFF %T'..SC- C.A.N ALSO FORWARD PIAN TO V. B WILL THE PLAN BE FORWARDED 'FO THE VILLAGE BOARD FOR A FINAL DECISION? NO PROJECT AREA VOTE MAIL BALLOTSTO PROJECT ARFA INDICATE; DEADLINE FOR RETURN REQUEST' E -MAULS FOR FUTURE NO'T ICES JNO HAS THEMIINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF SU PPORT BEEN ACHIEVED TO CONSTRUCT A TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT'.' \I� OT:S V /LI_rICE• R04RU t10ET[NC NOTICE E -MAIL IM'IT'ATION T'O PROJECT AREA POST VOTE REStT.I'S O,N VILLAGE WEB SITE (1 0S.l, - 0 TPROJECT DF:SY VlILI!'E804RDM1TEE "71NC H1 S'I: \ND 1 SIAIL PROIECF AREA OF DECISION STAFF PRESENTS RECOMMENDED PLAN VIIIIGESOARD DIRECTED REVIEW POST VOTE RESULTS ON VILLAGE WEB SITE SOLICIT - INPU F FROMRESIDE;NT'S REV IEWV.B.S.RCSIDFNTCOMMEN'FS CONSIDER NON- TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES VOTE TO AC( CPT PLAN RIFTNE PLAN AS NECESSARY APPROlI )NSTRUGTION - —1 Pros ; j Public W.r D P.4 en VILLAGE - INITIATED PROJECT PROJECT PRIORIT IZATION BANK PROJECTS IF MULTIPLE REQUESTS DETERMENE TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW C'REITE PROJECT AREA DETERMINETYPEIEXTF OF PROBLEM ESTABLISH LIMITS OF POTENTIAL IMPACT IDENTIFY POTENTIAL MEASURES RMPEM'NOTIFIC47 /ON MAIL INFORMATION TO PROJECT AREA SOLICIT PLAN INPUT FROM RESIDENTS INDICATE PLANNED T. S. C. MEETING DATE CREATE WEB PAGE ON VILLAGE WEB SITE REQUEST E -MAILS FOR FUTURE NOTICES PML/MINARYPLANDEVELOPMENT' PREPARE ENGINEERING PLAN SOLICIT INPUT FROM VILLAGE DEPTS REFINE PLAN AS NECESSARY DEVELOP COST ESTIMATE DATA COLLECTION IS IT NECESSARY TO COLLECT UPDATED YES PERFORM SITE INSPECTION TRAFFIC DATA? COLLECT UPDATED DATA AS NECESSARY REVIEW ACCIDENT RECORDS NO NO DOES THE STREET QUALIFY FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES? YES PROVIDE PETITION FORM TO REQUESTOR TRAFFIC CONCERNS PUT IN WRITING HAS THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF NO SIGNATURES BEEN OBTAINED TO DEVELOP A TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN? YES CONSIDER NON- TRAFFIC CALMINC MEASURES EDUCATION RESOURCES SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT SPEED DISPLAY TRAILER POLICE DRONE VEHICLE IMPROVING SIGHT DISTANCE SIGNING & STRIPING 7R4kl'P LK 4T NN' S4FE7'F' :'N777C E -h1AIL REMINDFR'TO PROJECT AREA UPDATE WEB PAGE ON VILLAGE WEB SITE 'IR4�NYA')RF: {FR?N'S4FEIY CTMIMAY/(AVJ7FFl7frT; I.f15 {SNIT 77LI .NSA'Xff.I7fOtV:S1FEtM1'CCMRZ LNRFX7EUREV/ER STAFF PRESENTS RECOMMENDED PLAN SOLICIT INPUT FROM RESIDENTS REVIEW S C.8 RESIDENT' COMMENTS VOTE TO RECOMMEND PLAN REFINE PLAN AS NECESSARY iIDY®` ff 417 LNG PERIOD R-DAS" PERIOD TO REQUEST V. B DECISION STAFF %T'..SC- C.A.N ALSO FORWARD PIAN TO V. B WILL THE PLAN BE FORWARDED 'FO THE VILLAGE BOARD FOR A FINAL DECISION? NO PROJECT AREA VOTE MAIL BALLOTSTO PROJECT ARFA INDICATE; DEADLINE FOR RETURN REQUEST' E -MAULS FOR FUTURE NO'T ICES JNO HAS THEMIINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF SU PPORT BEEN ACHIEVED TO CONSTRUCT A TRAFFIC CALMING PROJECT'.' \I� OT:S V /LI_rICE• R04RU t10ET[NC NOTICE E -MAIL IM'IT'ATION T'O PROJECT AREA POST VOTE REStT.I'S O,N VILLAGE WEB SITE (1 0S.l, - 0 TPROJECT DF:SY VlILI!'E804RDM1TEE "71NC H1 S'I: \ND 1 SIAIL PROIECF AREA OF DECISION STAFF PRESENTS RECOMMENDED PLAN VIIIIGESOARD DIRECTED REVIEW POST VOTE RESULTS ON VILLAGE WEB SITE SOLICIT - INPU F FROMRESIDE;NT'S REV IEWV.B.S.RCSIDFNTCOMMEN'FS CONSIDER NON- TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES VOTE TO AC( CPT PLAN RIFTNE PLAN AS NECESSARY APPROlI )NSTRUGTION - —1 Pros ; j Public W.r D P.4 en VILLAGE - INITIATED PROJECT PROJECT PRIORIT IZATION BANK PROJECTS IF MULTIPLE REQUESTS DETERMENE TIMETABLE FOR REVIEW C'REITE PROJECT AREA DETERMINETYPEIEXTF OF PROBLEM ESTABLISH LIMITS OF POTENTIAL IMPACT IDENTIFY POTENTIAL MEASURES RMPEM'NOTIFIC47 /ON MAIL INFORMATION TO PROJECT AREA SOLICIT PLAN INPUT FROM RESIDENTS INDICATE PLANNED T. S. C. MEETING DATE CREATE WEB PAGE ON VILLAGE WEB SITE REQUEST E -MAILS FOR FUTURE NOTICES PML/MINARYPLANDEVELOPMENT' PREPARE ENGINEERING PLAN SOLICIT INPUT FROM VILLAGE DEPTS REFINE PLAN AS NECESSARY DEVELOP COST ESTIMATE Appendix B — Minimum Criteria L "unt Pro'p(ct 1 li Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program B1 MINIMUM CRITERIA The Engineering Division has collected extensive vehicular volume and speed data including average daily traffic, peak hour volume, average speeds and 85' percentile speeds on most neighborhood streets as part of the Neighborhood Traffic Study. If updated traffic data is necessary before deciding whether a street qualifies for traffic calming measures, the Engineering Division will perform a traffic study. Otherwise, the Engineering Division will rely on the data collected from the Neighborhood Traffic Study. For a street to qualify for traffic calming measures and begin the petition process, at least one of the criteria thresholds below must be met. Speed* • The average speed is at least 5 mph above the speed limit • The 85` percentile speed is at least 9 mph above the speed limit Volume ** * The average daily traffic is at least 1000 vehicles * The peak hour volume is at least 120 vehicles * the 20 mph school speed limit is to be used along streets adjacent to schools, when applicable signs are in place, and when enhancing pedestrian safety is a primary goal; in all other cases the standard posted speed limit for the street is to be used ** applies only to collector streets adjacent to high pedestrian generator facilities (schools, churches, parks, etc.) and local streets Should an individual street qualify for traffic calming measures, the Engineering Division will also identify any surrounding streets that may be significantly impacted by traffic calming measures on the street in question. The selected surrounding streets may not meet the minimum criteria but could be adversely impacted if not considered in the development of a traffic calming project. The boundaries of potential significant impact will define the Project Area. The only exception to meeting any of the criteria thresholds is if the street has a recent history of crashes atypical for a neighborhood street and traffic calming measures are the appropriate solution. Should the Engineering Division identify a high crash rate for the street, the Village has the discretion to initiate development of a traffic calming project even if none of the vehicular volume or speed criterions are met. In analyzing the crash reports for a street with a recent history of crashes, the Engineering Division will first consider less intrusive education, enforcement and engineering measures. If it is determined traffic calming measures are the appropriate solution, the Engineering Division will begin the Village- initiated process as described on page 13. Definitions These definitions pertain to the criteria thresholds described above and apply to an engineering traffic study typically lasting between 48 and 72 hours. average speed — The mean speed, in miles per hour, of all vehicles during the traffic study. It is typically measured at the midblock of the street. 85 percentile speed — The speed, in miles per hour, at which 85% of all vehicles during the traffic study are traveling at or below. It is typically measured at the midblock of the street and represents the basis for establishing the speed limit. average daily traffic — The number of vehicles, measured in both directions, passing a point along the street during a 24 -hour period. It is calculated by dividing the total number of recorded vehicles by the number of days in the traffic study. peak hour volume — The highest number of vehicles, measured in both directions, passing a point along the street during any 1 -hour period during the traffic study. Appendix C — Petition Form Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 -2229 TRAFFIC CALMING PETITION FORM Deputy Director Jason H. Leib Pursuant to the guidelines set forth in the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, in order for the Village to consider a traffic calming project, the person /group making the request must obtain signatures from at least 51 % of those properties directly impacted by the request. The attached map indicates those properties. Based on the _ properties, a minimum of _ signatures is required. Note that only one (1) signature will be counted for each property. The person/group making the request must make all effort to notify every property. Once everyone directly impacted by the request has been notified and the minimum number of signatures has been obtained, the petition form is to be returned to the Public Works Department. Once the petition has been processed, the Village will then notify everyone in the project area of the next steps. A description of the traffic concerns will assist the Village in developing a solution. On the following lines, please provide the following information: • Description of problem(s) • Time(s) of day / day(s) of week when the problem occurs • Possible causes of the problem • Any other information the Village should be aware of regarding the problem Phone 847/870 -5640 Fax 847/253 -9377 www.mountprospect.org Y O O 4� 2 E L �n 0 L a . oq U � C1 U O � L O O O U � U >z d 0 c 0 L O C c 0 n i O r O U Appendix D — Project Prioritization Worksheet Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Location Speed Factor Speed Limit (mph) avergspeed (mph) ablimit or t 85th percentile speed above s eed limit Points 1000- 1 100 9 2 1101 -1200 10 4 1201 -1300 I1 6 e 12 13 or more 8 10 maximum whichever is higher Volume Factor for Local Streets average daily traffic or peak hour volume Points 1000- 1 100 120- 130 1 1101 -1200 131 -140 2 1201 -1300 141 - 150 3 1301 -1400 151 - 160 4 1401 -1500 161 -170 5 1501 - 1600 171 - 180 6 1601 - 1700 181 - 190 7 1701 - 1800 191 -200 8 1801 - 1900 1901 and above 201 -210 211 and above 9 10 maximum r whichever is higher Volume Factor or Collector Streets ' average daily traffic or ° peak hour volume Points 1000- 1300 120- 150 1 1301 - 1600 151 - 180 2 1601 - 1900 181 -210 3 1901 -2200 211 -240 4 2201 -2500 2501 -2800 2801 -3100 3101 -3400 241 -270 271 -300 301 -330 331 -360 5 6 7 8 3401 -3700 3701 and above 361 -390 391 and above 9 10 maximum ' applies only to collector stme6 adjaceu to high pedestrian generator facilities (schools, churches. parks, etc.) whichever is higher Crash History Factor average 9 of annual Points crashes (past 3 ears 1 1 2 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 or more 10 maximum Pedestrian Generator Factor 4 of affected Points' p edestrian generator s 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 or more 5 maximum I doubled if school or park involved Points Sidewalk Factor % street Points not having sidewalk 1 -10 1 1 1 - 25 2 26 - 50 3 51 -75 4 76- 100 5 maximum Project Prioritization Worksheet Recorded Speed & Volume Data average speed (mph) 85th percentile speed (mph) average daily traffic volume peak hour traffic volume School /Park Total Points Appendix E — Traffic Calming Toolbox Nt, MIt PIO„rL 6�� Village of Mount Prospect V Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program E1 TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX This toolbox was developed to provide guidance on the use of various traffic calming measures acceptable in the Village of Mount Prospect. It is intended to be used in conjunction with the overall Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program that outlines the goals, policies and processes for addressing traffic concerns in the Village. Each page provides the following information for different traffic calming measures: Description An illustration and written description is provided for each measure. Application Each traffic calming measure is designed to address specific traffic issues. The application section outlines the common uses for each measure. Advantages Each measure in the toolbox provides some advantages to traffic calming and to the quality of life in the neighborhood. The advantages section outlines the positive impacts associated with each traffic calming measure. Disadvantages Although each measure included in the toolbox provides some positive aspects to traffic calming, each has negative impacts as well. The disadvantages are outlined so that tools can be evaluated for both their positive and negative effects. Variations There are often several variations of specific traffic calming measures. Several of these are provided where they are appropriate. Special Considerations This section offers a variety of issues that should be considered for each traffic calming measure. Emergency response and operational concerns are flagged in this section. Cost The cost section is intended as a general guide to costs using low, moderate and high designations for the different measures. Village of Mount Prospect I N E2 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Traffic Calming Measures Not Used in the Program Stop signs are not traffic calming measures. They are traffic control devices that assign right -of -way to conflicting traffic movements at intersections. They are not to be used for speed control. Traffic studies have shown there is little difference with vehicle speeds at the midblock whether there is or is not a stop sign at the adjacent intersection. In some cases, vehicular speeds after the vehicle has passed through an unwarranted stop controlled intersection are as high, and occasionally higher, than without a stop sign, as motorists try to "make up lost time" at the stop sign. Stop signs should be installed only at locations where conditions meet criteria established in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Unwarranted stop signs can have a high violation rate, create disrespect at other stop controlled intersections and create a false sense of security for other road users and pedestrians. Children at Play signs are commonly requested in neighborhoods. However, they are not standard traffic control devices and have not been found to be effective in improving the safety of children. Residential areas commonly have children and the presence of these signs does not necessarily have a long -term effect on driver behavior. The Village's policy is that such signs will only be installed adjacent to parks where there is an expectation on the driver's part to see a concentration of children playing. Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program E3 Traffic Calming Measures Used in the Program Education Enforcement Signing & Striping Horizontal Deflection Measures • Traffic Circle • Chicane Constriction Measures • Choke Point • Midblock Median Vertical Deflection Measures* • Speed Hump • Speed Table / Raised Crosswalk Pedestrian Safety Measures • Curb Extension • Pedestrian Refuge Volume Reducing Measures* • Diverter • Intersection Median Barrier • Street Closure • Turn Restriction * Vertical deflection and volume reducing measures can alter the existing transportation circulation system. As a result, these measures have impacts that would need to be evaluated in greater scope than just along one particular street. While they can be a viable solution to a street problem, it is important not to shift the problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood. Careful consideration must be taken before using vertical deflection or volume reducing measures. Village of Mount Prospect �{ Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program E4 - � EDUCATION �A .rte KEEP KIDS ALIVE 2511, Description Using different media such as written material, the Village web site, meetings and one -on -one conversations, Village - generated information is provided to residents. Application • Streets that are believed to experience excessive speeding, excessive volume or stop sign violations as communicated by residents • Resident groups that wish to play an active role in easing traffic concerns along residential streets such as participation in the Keep Kids Alive — Drive 25 campaign Advantages • Opportunity to discuss extent of problem and appropriate course of action • Staff able to explain program as well as criteria to qualify for traffic calming measures • Staff and residents partner to determine appropriate solutions • Village resources used to communicate Staff's perspective • Solicit resident involvement to ease traffic concerns Disadvantages • Residents may not agree with Staff's perspective or recommendations Variations Special Considerations • Residents need to understand process before proceeding with a traffic calming project Cost: Low other than a considerable amount of Staff time Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 1 61 ES ENFORCEMENT Description Enforcement relies on the Police Department to be a presence in neighborhoods and enforce existing speed limit and traffic control ordinances. Application • Streets that are believed to experience excessive speeding or stop sign violations as communicated by residents • Streets that have a history of excessive speeding or stop sign violations Advantages • Effective while officer present • Radar speed trailer and drone vehicle can lower vehicle speeds with no officer present • Use of radar speed trailer and drone vehicle offers flexibility to implement in short notice • Extent of problem can be discussed with residents and Engineering Division after enforcement period Disadvantages • Requires periodic enforcement to have long -term effect • Staffing limitations stretches Police Department personnel and resources Variations Special Considerations • Often helpful in school zones • May be used during learning period when new measures or signs first installed Cost: Low other than a considerable amount of Staff time Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program E6 SIGNING & STRIPING Description Regulatory, warning and guide signs along with striping and pavement markings are used to provide guidance to motorists to enhance the safety of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians in a neighborhood. Application • Streets that are believed to experience a traffic problem as communicated by residents • To promote alternative modes of transportation such as walking and biking Advantages • Provides definition of traffic ordinances • Assists Police Department in enforcement efforts • Inexpensive approach to address a traffic problem • Providing safe facilities may encourage more residents to walk and bike in neighborhoods Disadvantages • Requires periodic enforcement to have long -term effect • Unrealistic or unwarranted signs tend to be disregarded • Use of a lot of signs can detract the look of a neighborhood Variations Special Considerations • Consistency from street to street increases expectation on motorists' part Cost: Low other than a considerable amount of Staff time to enforce Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program E7 TRAFFIC CIRCLE _ I r�l OR, I h, Description A traffic circle is a raised circular median in an intersection with counterclockwise traffic flow. Vehicles must change their travel path to maneuver around the circle. They are typically landscaped and have appropriate signage to safely guide motorists. Application • Streets where speed control is desired • Intersections where there is a high rate of right angle collisions Advantages • Reduces vehicle speeds through intersection • Breaks up sight lines on straight streets • Landscaping improves aesthetics at intersection • Can reduce right angle collisions Disadvantages • May impede emergency vehicle response • Narrowed travel lanes may cause bicycle / vehicle conflict • Creates physical obstruction in the travel way • Requires some on- street parking removal near intersection • May impede left turns by large vehicles Variations • Can include curb extensions • Can include diverter islands Special Considerations • Should be used in series or in conjunction with other traffic calming devices • Fire Department and Police Department input necessary with design • Lighting should be provided at intersection • May require educational campaign and learning period Cost: High Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program I E8 CHICANE Y S ` ~ IL F Description Chicanes create a curved street alignment that is designed to fit in existing rights -of -way. The curvilinear alignment requires additional maneuvering and reduces motorists' sight line. They can be landscaped and have appropriate signage or striping to safely guide motorists. Application • Streets where speed control is desired • Straight streets where reduced sight line is desired Advantages • Reduces vehicle speeds along street • Breaks up sight lines on straight streets • Landscaping improves aesthetics along street • Minimal impact on emergency vehicle response Disadvantages • Requires some on- street parking removal • Snow removal, leaf pick -up and street sweeping operations more difficult • Expensive since they are installed in series along street • Existing driveways and parkway trees may cause difficulty to design Variations • Traffic lanes can be narrowed to have greater impact on vehicle speeds Special Considerations • Cannot be used where right -of -way is limited Cost: High Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program E9 CHOKE POINT it i• 1 �4 E- - - YI�1J MEY� �w Description A choke point is a segment of street narrowing where existing street edges or curbs are extended toward the center of the street. They are typically landscaped and have appropriate signage to safely guide motorists. Application • Streets where speed control is desired • Shorten midblock pedestrian crossings Advantages • Narrowed street section may contribute to lower vehicle speeds • Landscaping improves aesthetics along street • Minimal impact on emergency vehicle response Disadvantages • Requires some on- street parking removal • Snow removal, leaf pick -up and street sweeping operations more difficult • Narrowed travel lanes may cause bicycle / vehicle conflict Variations Can include crosswalk at high pedestrian crossing areas Special Considerations • Should be used in series or in conjunction with other traffic calming devices Cost: Moderate to high depending on landscaping and storm sewer adjustments Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program I N E10 MIDBLOCK MEDIAN ' i Description A midblock median is a raised island in the center of a two -way street. They can identify the entrance to a residential area when placed near the intersection of an arterial street. They are typically landscaped. Application • Streets where speed control is desired • Define entry to a residential area Advantages • Narrowed and deflected street section may contribute to lower vehicle speeds • Notifies motorists of change in street character • Landscaping improves aesthetics along street • Minimal impact on emergency vehicle response • Breaks up sight lines on straight streets Disadvantages • Requires some on- street parking removal • Need for ongoing maintenance • Narrowed travel lanes may cause bicycle / vehicle conflict • Creates physical obstruction in the travel way Variations • Various widths and lengths • Can incorporate neighborhood identification signing Special Considerations • Cannot be used on existing narrow streets • Care must be taken not to create sight obstruction near intersections Cost: Moderate to high depending on landscaping Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program C7 SPEED HUMP y C ®I Description A speed hump is a raised area of pavement typically 3 to 4 inches in height over a length of 12 to 14 feet. They have appropriate signage and pavement markings to safely guide motorists over them. Application • Local streets where speed control is desired • Often used in series (typically spaced 250 to 400 feet apart) • Not to be used on collector streets or primary emergency vehicle response routes Advantages • Vertical deflection forces motorists to reduce speed • Minimal impact on snow removal, leaf pick -up and street sweeping operations • Easy installation process Disadvantages • Traffic may shift to an adjacent street or neighborhood • Significant impact on emergency vehicle response • Braking and accelerating increases traffic noise along street • Typically no landscape element thereby decreasing aesthetics along street • Requires some on- street parking removal Variations • Use colored or textured pavement as streetscaping alternative • Shapes include parabolic, circular and sinusoidal • Speed cushion (gaps across width of street) may reduce impact on emergency vehicle response Special Considerations • Care must be taken not to shift problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood • Avoid installation near intersections, in front of driveways and storm inlets, and along steep grade streets Cost: Low to moderate depending on width of street and number in series Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program \ !V E12 SPEED TABLE / RAISED CROSSWALK will uea:. L Description A speed table is a raised area of pavement with a flat section in the middle typically 3 to 4 inches in height over a length of 22 feet. They have appropriate signage and pavement markings to safely guide motorists over them. They can also include a crosswalk at a pedestrian crossing. Appropriate signage and pavement markings are provided at these locations to warn motorists of pedestrians. Application • Local streets where speed control is desired • Speed table often used in series (typically spaced 250 to 400 feet apart) • Raised crosswalk used at uncontrolled locations where a significant amount of pedestrians cross the street • Not to be used on collector streets or primary emergency vehicle response routes Advantages • Vertical deflection forces motorists to reduce speed but not as dramatically as with speed humps • Enhances pedestrian visibility and likelihood motorists will yield to pedestrians • Minimal impact on snow removal, leaf pick -up and street sweeping operations • Easy installation process Disadvantages • Traffic may shift to an adjacent street or neighborhood • Moderate impact on emergency vehicle response • Braking and accelerating increases traffic noise along street • Typically no landscape element thereby decreasing aesthetics along street • Requires some on- street parking removal Variations • Use colored or textured pavement as streetscaping alternative • Use raised crosswalk in combination with curb extensions and/or pedestrian refuge Special Considerations • Care must be taken not to shift problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood • Avoid installation near intersections, in front of driveways and storm inlets, and along steep grade streets Cost: Low to moderate depending on width of street and number in series Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program VE13 CURB EXTENSION Description A curb extension is a segment of street narrowing at an intersection where existing street edges or curbs are extended toward the center of the street. They have appropriate signage to safely guide motorists. Application • Wide streets with a significant amount of traffic • Intersections where a significant amount of pedestrians cross the street Advantages • Reduces pedestrian crossing distance and time • Makes pedestrian crossing points more visible to motorists • Prevents on- street parking near intersection • Minimal impact on emergency vehicle response Disadvantages • Snow removal, leaf pick -up and street sweeping operations more difficult • Narrowed travel lanes may cause bicycle / vehicle conflict Variations • Install on one or both intersecting streets • Extend edge or curb on one or both sides of streets Special Considerations • Should not be used on existing narrow streets Cost: Moderate to high depending on landscaping and storm sewer adjustments Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program VE14 PEDESTRIAN REFUGE Description A pedestrian refuge is a raised island in the center of a two -way street. The island has a gap in the curb creating two segments allowing passage for pedestrians. They may or may not be landscaped but have appropriate signage to safely guide motorists. Application • Wide streets with a significant amount of traffic • Midblock locations where a significant amount of pedestrians cross the street Advantages • Allows pedestrians to cross half the street at a time • Makes pedestrian crossing points more visible to motorists • Minimal impact on emergency vehicle response Disadvantages • Requires some on- street parking removal • Narrowed travel lanes may cause bicycle / vehicle conflict • Creates physical obstruction in the travel way Variations Use brick or textured pavement as landscaping alternative Special Considerations • Cannot be used on existing narrow streets Cost: Moderate to high depending on landscaping Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program E15 DIVERTER Mimi ®s wra UNDO ry , .s I I Description A diverter is a physical barrier that prevents access to specific legs of an intersection. They may or may not be landscaped but have appropriate signage to safely guide motorists. Application • Streets where volume control is desired • Prevent cut through traffic by eliminating entry onto a residential street Advantages • Reduces traffic volume on street • Bicycle and pedestrian access still provided Disadvantages • Prohibits or limits access to local homeowners • Prohibits or limits access to emergency vehicles • Traffic may shift to an adjacent street or neighborhood Variations • Full diagonal diverter bisects an intersection • Semi - diverter prohibits access into a residential area but allows vehicles to exit Special Considerations • Care must be taken not to shift problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood • Fire Department and Police Department input necessary with design Cost: Moderate to high depending on landscaping Village of Mount Prospect N( Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program - " E16 INTERSECTION MEDIAN BARRIER il. Description An intersection median barrier is a raised island along the center of a two -way street extending through an intersection to prevent specific turning movements. They may or may not be landscaped but have appropriate signage to safely guide motorists. Application • Streets where volume control is desired • Need to limit cut through traffic by controlling left -turn and side street through movements Advantages • Reduces traffic volume on side street • Reduces potential for collisions at intersection by eliminating left -turns • Landscaping improves aesthetics along street • Breaks up sight lines on straight streets Disadvantages • Limits access to local homeowners and emergency vehicles • Increase in U -turns at ends of medians • May require some on- street parking removal • Creates physical obstruction in the travel way • Traffic may shift to an adjacent street or neighborhood Variations • Various widths and lengths Special Considerations • Care must be taken not to shift problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood • Fire Department and Police Department input necessary with design • Important to maintain pedestrian and bicycle access Cost: Moderate to high depending on design and landscaping Village of Mount Prospect N{ Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program I S E17 STREET CLOSURE i / Description A street closure is a physical barrier across a street eliminating all vehicle access. Appropriate signage is used to warn motorists of condition. Application • Streets where volume control is desired • Prevent cut through traffic by eliminating access onto a residential street Advantages • Reduces traffic volume on street • Reduces noise associated with vehicles Disadvantages • Prohibits access to local homeowners • Prohibits access to emergency vehicles • Traffic may shift to an adjacent street or neighborhood Variations • Midblock closure creating a dead -end street Special Considerations • Care must be taken not to shift problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood • Fire Department and Police Department input necessary with design • Important to maintain pedestrian and bicycle access Cost: Moderate Village of Mount Prospect Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program VEl TURN RESTRICTION Description A turn restriction limits or prohibits specific turning movements by way of signage. Application • Streets where volume control is desired • Prevent cut through traffic by eliminating access onto a residential street Advantages • Reduces traffic volume on street • Inexpensive to install • Can be tailored to be time of day and day of week specific Disadvantages • Limits access to local homeowners • Requires enforcement since no physical barrier • Traffic may shift to an adjacent street or neighborhood Variations • Can use striping, pavement markings and /or a physical barrier to emphasize turn restriction Special Considerations • Care must be taken not to shift problem to an adjacent street or neighborhood Cost: Low Appendix F — Primary Emergency Vehicle Response Route Map mill 1 1 li PRIMARY EMERGENCY VEHICLE RESPONSE ROUTE MAP I N VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT I i �� 'LL F-1-77-: ff 77- JU arc uJ �� U—ST 1[71 4 ­UBST BLVD co...w. LEGEND ARTERIAL STREET PRIMARY EMERGENCY VEHICLE RESPONSE ROUTE LOCAL STREET Ý«®®»²¬ Ê·´´¿¹» ݱ¼» Ì»¨¬ ݸ¿°¬»® ëæ ß®¬·½´» È Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ëòïððïæ ÝÎÛßÌ×ÑÒ ßÒÜ ßÐÐÑ×ÒÌÓÛÒÌ Ì¸»®» ·­ ¸»®»¾§ »­¬¿¾´·­¸»¼ ¿ ½±³³·­­·±² ¬± ¾» µ²±©² ¿­ ¬¸» þÓ±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±²þô ½±²­·­¬·²¹ ±º ²·²» øç÷ ³»³¾»®­ô ©¸·½¸ ³»³¾»®­ ­¸¿´´ ¾» ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ¿­ º±´´±©­æ ßò ̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ­¸¿´´ ¿°°±·²¬ ­·¨ øê÷ ³»³¾»®­ô ²±¬ ·² ¬¸» »³°´±§ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ©¸± ¸¿ª» ¿ °®·³¿®§ ·²¬»®»­¬ ·² ­¿º»¬§ò Þò ̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ó¿²¿¹»® ­¸¿´´ ¿°°±·²¬ ¿ ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» º®±³ ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ б´·½» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ô ¿ ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» º®±³ ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ú·®» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ô ¿²¼ ¿ ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» º®±³ ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ ¬± ­»®ª» ±² ¬¸·­ ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿­ ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®­ò ̸» Ê·´´¿¹» »³°´±§»»­ ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ó¿²¿¹»® ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±²ò ß ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» º®±³ ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ¿­ ¿² »¨ ±ºº·½·±ô ²±²ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»® ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿²¼ ­¸¿´´ °»®º±®³ ¬¸» ¼«¬·»­ ±º ¬¸» Í»½®»¬¿®§ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ò Ýò ̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ­¸¿´´ ¿°°±·²¬ ¬¸» ݸ¿·®³¿² ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ³³·­­·±²ò ̸» ݸ¿·®³¿² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ²± ³±®» ¬¸¿² ¬©± øî÷ ½±²­»½«¬·ª» ¬»®³­ ¿­ ݸ¿·®³¿²ò ̸» ¬»®³ ±º ±ºº·½» º±® ¬¸» ³»³¾»®­ ©¸± ¿®» ²±¬ ·² ¬¸» »³°´±§ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ­¸¿´´ ¾» º±® ¿ °»®·±¼ ±º º±«® øì÷ §»¿®­ô ±® «²¬·´ ¬¸»·® ­«½½»­­±®­ ¿®» ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ¿²¼ ¯«¿´·º·»¼ò ß²§ ³»³¾»® ­¸¿´´ ¾» »´·¹·¾´» º±® ®»¿°°±·²¬³»²¬ò Ó»³¾»®­ ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ±® »³°´±§»»­ô ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±²ò øÑ®¼ò îðïèô éóîëóïçêéå Ñ®¼ò ììíçô êóîóïççîå Ñ®¼ò ìêççô ïóíó ïççëå Ñ®¼ò ìèîðô çóíóïççê÷ ëòïððîæ ÎÛÝÑÎÜÍ ßÒÜ Ó×ÒËÌÛÍ ×³³»¼·¿¬»´§ «°±² ·¬­ ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±²ô ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ­»´»½¬ ¿ Ê·½» ݸ¿·®³¿² º®±³ ·¬­ ³»³¾»®­ò ̸» ݸ¿·®³¿² ­¸¿´´ ¼»­·¹²¿¬» ¬¸» ³»»¬·²¹ ¼¿¬»­å ¸±©»ª»®ô ¬¸»®» ­¸¿´´ ¾» ¿ ³·²·³«³ ±º º±«® øì÷ ³»»¬·²¹­ »¿½¸ §»¿®ò ̸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¿¼±°¬ ®«´»­ º±® ¬¸» ½±²¼«½¬ ±º ·¬­ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ µ»»° ©®·¬¬»² ³·²«¬»­ ±º ¿´´ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ °®±½»»¼·²¹­ò ß´´ ³·²«¬»­ ±º ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¾» °«¾´·½ ¿²¼ ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» º±® »¨¿³·²¿¬·±² ·² ¬¸» ±ºº·½» ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ý´»®µ ¼«®·²¹ ®»¹«´¿® ¾«­·²»­­ ¸±«®­ò øÑ®¼ò ìéêêô ïîóëóïççëå Ñ®¼ò ìèîðô çóíóïççê÷ ëòïððíæ ÐËÎÐÑÍÛ ÑÚ ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ Ì¸» °«®°±­» ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ³³·­­·±² ·­ ¬¸» ®»¼«½¬·±² ±º ¿½½·¼»²¬­ô ·²¶«®·»­ ¿²¼ ¼»¿¬¸­ ±² ¿´´ ­¬®»»¬­ô °«¾´·½ ®·¹¸¬­ ±º ©¿§ ¿²¼ °«¾´·½ °®±°»®¬·»­å ¿²¼ ¿´­±ô ¸»¿´¬¸ ¸¿¦¿®¼­ ­«½¸ ¿­ ¿·® °±´´«¬·±²ô ©¿¬»® °±´´«¬·±² ¿²¼ ­«½¸ ±¬¸»® ¿½¬·ª·¬·»­ ¬¸¿¬ ³¿§ ¾» ·²½·¼»²¬ ¬± ¬¸» ¸»¿´¬¸ ¿²¼ ­¿º»¬§ ±º ¬¸» ®»­·¼»²¬­ ±º Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ô ¾§ ¬¸» ¾»­¬ ³»¬¸±¼­ ±º »¼«½¿¬·±²ô »²¹·²»»®·²¹ô »²º±®½»³»²¬ô ´»¹·­´¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ¿¼³·²·­¬®¿¬·±²ò øÑ®¼ò îðïèô éóîëóïçêé÷ °¿¹» ï ±º î ëòïððìæ ÜËÌ×ÛÍ ÑÚ ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ Ì¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ©·´´ °»®º±®³ ¿²¼ »¨»®½·­» ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ º«²½¬·±²­æ ßò ݱ±°»®¿¬» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ·² ½¿®®§·²¹ ±«¬ ¿ °®±¹®¿³ ±º ­¿º»¬§ ·² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ò Þò ̱ ®»½±³³»²¼ ­«½¸ ¿½¬·±²­ ¬± ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ¿­ ·¬ ³¿§ ¼»»³ ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» ¬± ­»®ª» ¬¸» ½¿«­» ±º ­¿º»¬§ò Ýò Ø»¿® ¿°°»¿´­ º®±³ ¬¸» ¼»½·­·±²­ ±º ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ©·¬¸ ®»­°»½¬ ¬± ­·¹¸¬ ±¾­¬®«½¬·±²­ô ¿­ ­»¬ º±®¬¸ ·² Í»½¬·±² çòïïé ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ¼»ò Üò ײª·¬» ¿²¼ »²½±«®¿¹» ¬¸» ½±±°»®¿¬·±² ±º ½±³³«²·¬§ ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±²­ ­«½¸ ¿­ ®»´·¹·±«­ô ­½¸±±´­ô ¸±³» ±©²»®­ ±® ½·ª·½ ¹®±«°­ ·² ½¿®®§·²¹ ±² ·¬­ ©±®µò Ûò ̸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» ¿«¬¸±®·¬§ ¬± ·²­°»½¬ ¿²¼ »¨¿³·²» ¿²§ ¿²¼ ¿´´ ®»½±®¼­ô ¿²¼ ¿²§ ®»°±®¬­ º®±³ ¿²§ ¼»°¿®¬³»²¬ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ¹±ª»®²³»²¬ ®»´¿¬·²¹ ¬± ·¬­ ©±®µ ¬± ­»®ª» ¬¸» ½¿«­» ±º ­¿º»¬§ô »¨½»°¬ Ê·´´¿¹» °»®­±²²»´ ®»½±®¼­ô ¶«ª»²·´» ®»½±®¼­ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ®»½±®¼­ °®±¬»½¬»¼ ¾§ ´¿©ò λ°±®¬­ º®±³ ¬¸» б´·½» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ ©·´´ ¾» º«®²·­¸»¼ «°±² ¿ ­¸±©·²¹ ±º ¹±±¼ ½¿«­»ò ß²§ Ê·´´¿¹» ¼»°¿®¬³»²¬ ±® ¿¹»²½§ ­¸¿´´ º«®²·­¸ ·²º±®³¿¬·±² ½±²½»®²·²¹ ·¬­ ©±®µô ®»½±®¼­ ±® ®»°±®¬­ ©¸»² ­«½¸ ·²º±®³¿¬·±² ·­ ®»¯«»­¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±²ò Úò Í«¾³·¬ô ²±¬ ´»­­ ¬¸¿² ­»³·ó¿²²«¿´´§ô ¿ ®»°±®¬ ¬± ¬¸» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ±² ¿´´ ¿½¬·ª·¬·»­ ±º ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±²ô ¬±¹»¬¸»® ©·¬¸ ­«½¸ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ¿­ ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ©·­¸ ¬± ¬®¿²­³·¬ò øÑ®¼ò îðïèô éóîëóïçêéå Ñ®¼ò ììçïô ïîóïóïççî÷ °¿¹» î ±º î Ê·´´¿¹» ݱ¼» ß³»²¼³»²¬ ݸ¿°¬»® ëæ ß®¬·½´» È Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ëòïððïæ ÝÎÛßÌ×ÑÒ ßÒÜ ÐËÎÐÑÍÛ Ì¸»®» ·­ ¸»®»¾§ »­¬¿¾´·­¸»¼ ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ¬± ¿­­·­¬ô ·²º±®³ ¿²¼ ¿¼ª·­» ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»­ ­¬¿ºº ¿²¼ »´»½¬»¼ ±ºº·½·¿´­ ±² ³¿¬¬»®­ °»®¬¿·²·²¹ ¬± ¬¸» ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ±º °»±°´» ¿²¼ ³¿¬»®·¿´­ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ¿²¼ ¿¼¶±·²·²¹ ³«²·½·°¿´·¬·»­ô ¿²¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» ²±®¬¸»¿­¬»®² ×´´·²±·­ ®»¹·±² ¿­ ·¬ ¿ºº»½¬­ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ò ëòïððîæ ÓÛÓÞÛÎÍØ×Р̸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ½±²­·­¬ ±º ²·²» øç÷ ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®­ ¿²¼ ±²» øï÷ ²±²ó ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®ô ©¸± ­¸¿´´ ¾» ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ¿­ º±´´±©­æ ßò̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ­¸¿´´ ¿°°±·²¬ ­·¨ øê÷ ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®­ô ²±¬ ·² ¬¸» »³°´±§ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ©¸± ¸¿ª» ¿² ·²¬»®»­¬ ·² ¬¸» ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ±º °»±°´» ¿²¼ ³¿¬»®·¿´­ô ¿²¼ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ­¿º»¬§ò ̸»­» ³»³¾»®­ ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ©·¬¸±«¬ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±²ò Þò̸» ݸ·»º ±º б´·½»ô Ú·®» ݸ·»º ¿²¼ Ü·®»½¬±® ±º Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ ­¸¿´´ ¿­­·¹² ¿ ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» º®±³ ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ б´·½» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ô Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ú·®» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ ¿²¼ Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ô ®»­°»½¬·ª»´§ô ¬± ­»®ª» ±² ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿­ ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®­ ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±²ò Ýòß ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» ±º ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±² ¿­ ¿² »¨ ±ºº·½·±ô ²±²ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»® ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿²¼ ­¸¿´´ °»®º±®³ ¬¸» ¼«¬·»­ ±º ¬¸» Í»½®»¬¿®§ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ò Üò̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ô ­¸¿´´ ¿°°±·²¬ ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ô ¿²¼ ½±²­·¼»® ¬¸» ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ³»³¾»®­ ·² ­± ¼±·²¹ò ̸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ²± ³±®» ¬¸¿² ¬©± øî÷ ½±²­»½«¬·ª» ¬»®³­ ·² ¬¸» °±­·¬·±²ò ÛòÊ¿½¿²½·»­ ±² ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¾» º·´´»¼ º±® ¬¸» «²»¨°·®»¼ ¬»®³ ±º ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ±® ¿²§ ³»³¾»® ©¸± ·­ ²±¬ »³°´±§»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ¾§ ¿°°±·²¬³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ò ̸» ¬»®³ ±º ±ºº·½» º±® ³»³¾»®­ô ©¸± ¿®» ²±¬ »³°´±§»¼ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ­¸¿´´ ¾» º±® ¿ °»®·±¼ ±º º±«® øì÷ §»¿®­ ±® «²¬·´ ¬¸»·® ¯«¿´·º·»¼ ­«½½»­­±®­ ¿®» ¿°°±·²¬»¼ò ß²§ ³»³¾»® ­¸¿´´ ¾» »´·¹·¾´» º±® ®»¿°°±·²¬³»²¬ò ̸» ³»³¾»®­ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ­»´»½¬ º®±³ ·¬­ ³»³¾»®­¸·° ¿ Ê·½» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ©¸± ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ¿­ ¿½¬·²¹ ½¸¿·®°»®­±² ©¸»²»ª»® ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ·­ ¿¾­»²¬ º®±³ ¬¸» ³»»¬·²¹ò ̸» Ê·½» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ²± ³±®» ¬¸¿² ¬©± øî÷ ½±²­»½«¬·ª» ¬»®³­ ·² ¬¸» °±­·¬·±²ò °¿¹» ï ±º í ̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ô ­¸¿´´ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» °±©»® ¬± ®»³±ª» ¿²§ ³»³¾»® ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ò ëòïððíæ ÑÞÖÛÝÌ×ÊÛ ßÒÜ ÌÑÐ×ÝÍ ÑÚ Ü×ÍÝËÍÍ×ÑÒ Ì¸» ±¾¶»½¬·ª» ±º ¬¸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¾» ¬± »²½±«®¿¹» ¿²¼ º¿½·´·¬¿¬» ­¿º» ¿²¼ »ºº·½·»²¬ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ¿²¼ ¿¼¶±·²·²¹ ³«²·½·°¿´·¬·»­ô ¿²¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» ²±®¬¸»¿­¬»®² ×´´·²±·­ ®»¹·±² ¿­ ·¬ ¿ºº»½¬­ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ò ̸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ º«²½¬·±² ¿­ ¿¼ª·­±® ¬± Ê·´´¿¹» ­¬¿ººô ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ±² ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ¬±°·½­æ ßò̸» »ºº·½·»²¬ ¿²¼ ­¿º» ³±ª»³»²¬ ±º ª»¸·½´»­ô ¾·½§½´»­ ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ ¿´±²¹ Ê·´´¿¹»ô ݱ«²¬§ ¿²¼ ͬ¿¬» ®±¿¼­ò ÞòÍ¿º»¬§ °´¿²­ ¿®±«²¼ ­½¸±±´­ô ½¸«®½¸»­ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ´±½¿¬·±²­ ¬¸¿¬ ¹»²»®¿¬» ¿ ¸·¹¸ ´»ª»´ ±º ª»¸·½´»ñ°»¼»­¬®·¿² ·²¬»®¿½¬·±²ò ÝòÞ·½§½´» ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ·²º®¿­¬®«½¬«®» °®±¶»½¬­ ·² ­«°°±®¬ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»­ ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ¿²¼ Þ·½§½´» д¿²ò ÜòѲ󭬮»»¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ Ê·´´¿¹»ó±©²»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ´±¬­ò ÛòÓ¿­­ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¬®¿·²­ô ¾«­»­ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ­«½¸ ³»¿²­ò ÚòÓ«´¬·ó¶«®·­¼·½¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»¹·±²¿´ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ·­­«»­ò ëòïððìæ ÜËÌ×ÛÍ ×² ¿¼ª·­·²¹ ¿²¼ ¿­­·­¬·²¹ Ê·´´¿¹» ­¬¿ººô ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ô ¬¸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¼«¬·»­æ ßò̱ ®»ª·»© ¿²¼ ½±²­·¼»® ¬±°·½­ ¼»­½®·¾»¼ ·² Í»½¬·±² ëòïððí ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ¼»ô ¿²¼ ¬± ®»½±³³»²¼ ­«½¸ ¿½¬·±²ô ¿­ ·¬ ¼»»³­ ¿°°®±°®·¿¬»ô ¬± ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ò Þò̱ ½±²­·¼»® ¿²¼ ³¿µ» ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ±² ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ·­­«»­ô ¿­ ¼·®»½¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ò Ýò̱ °®±ª·¼» º»»¼¾¿½µ ¿²¼ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ¬± Ê·´´¿¹» ­¬¿ºº ±² ´±½¿´ ¿²¼ ®»¹·±²¿´ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² °®±¶»½¬­ ¿²¼ °®±¹®¿³­ °®»­»²¬»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¾§ ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ±® ±¬¸»®­ò Üò̱ ½®»¿¬» ¿² ±°»² ¿¬³±­°¸»®» ¬¸¿¬ ¿´´±©­ ¬¸» °«¾´·½ ¬± ½±³³«²·½¿¬» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿²¼ °¿®¬·½·°¿¬» ·² ·¬­ ³»»¬·²¹­ò Ûò̱ ·²ª·¬» ¿²¼ »²½±«®¿¹» ½±³³«²·¬§ ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±²­ ­«½¸ ¿­ ­½¸±±´­ô ½¸«®½¸»­ô ¸±³»±©²»® ¿­­±½·¿¬·±²­ ¿²¼ ½·ª·½ ¹®±«°­ ¬± °¿®¬·½·°¿¬» ·² ¬¸» ©±®µ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ò °¿¹» î ±º í Úò̱ ­«¾³·¬ ½±®®»­°±²¼»²½» ¬± ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ±² ¿´´ ¿½¬·ª·¬·»­ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ·²½´«¼·²¹ô ¾«¬ ²±¬ ´·³·¬»¼ ¬±ô ¿¹»²¼¿­ô ³»»¬·²¹ ³·²«¬»­ ¿²¼ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ò Ùò̱ ®»¯«»­¬ ­¬¿¬·­¬·½¿´ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ·²º±®³¿¬·±² º®±³ Ê·´´¿¹» ¼»°¿®¬³»²¬­ º±® ®»ª·»© ·² ®»´¿¬·±² ¬± ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²­ ¼«¬·»­ò Øò̱ ½±²­·¼»® ¿°°»¿´­ º®±³ ¼»½·­·±²­ ±º ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ©·¬¸ ®»­°»½¬ ¬± ­·¹¸¬ ±¾­¬®«½¬·±²­ô ¿­ °®±ª·¼»¼ ·² Í»½¬·±² çòíðè ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ¼»ò ëòïððëæ ÓÛÛÌ×ÒÙÍ Ì¸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ³»»¬ ±² ¬¸» ­»½±²¼ Ó±²¼¿§ ±º »¿½¸ ³±²¬¸ «²´»­­ ²±¬·½» ±º ½¿²½»´´¿¬·±² ·­ ¹·ª»² ¾§ ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ±® Ü·®»½¬±® ±º Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ò ̸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ³¿§ ½¿´´ º±® ­°»½·¿´ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿­ ²»»¼»¼ò ̸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¿¼±°¬ ®«´»­ º±® ¬¸» ½±²¼«½¬ ±º ·¬­ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ µ»»° ©®·¬¬»² ³·²«¬»­ ±º ¿´´ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ °®±½»»¼·²¹­ò ß´´ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ ¿½¬·±²­ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¾» ½±²¼«½¬»¼ ·² ¿½½±®¼¿²½» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ®»¯«·®»³»²¬­ ±º ¬¸» ×´´·²±·­ Ñ°»² Ó»»¬·²¹­ ß½¬ò °¿¹» í ±º í Director Deputy Director Glen R. Andler Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Ó×ÒËÌÛÍ ÑÚ ÌØÛ ÓÑËÒÌ ÐÎÑÍÐÛÝÌ ÍßÚÛÌÇ ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ ÝßÔÔ ÌÑ ÑÎÜÛΠ̸» ®»¹«´¿® ³»»¬·²¹ ±º ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ©¿­ ½¿´´»¼ ¬± ±®¼»® ¿¬ éæðè °ò³ò ±² Ó±²¼¿§ô ß°®·´ ïïô îðïïò ÎÑÔÔ ÝßÔÔ Ð®»­»²¬ «°±² ®±´´ ½¿´´æ Ö±¸² Õ»¿²» ݸ¿·®³¿² ݸ«½µ Þ»²½·½ ݱ³³·­­·±²»® ß²¹»´ Ý¿³°±­ ݱ³³·­­·±²»® α¾»®¬ Ú·­¸»® ݱ³³·­­·±²»® Ú®»¼ п³°»´ ݱ³³·­­·±²»® Ý¿®±´ ̱®¬±®»´´± ݱ³³·­­·±²»® Þ±¾ ͳ·¬¸ б´·½» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ λ°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» Ø»²®§ Ü¿©­±² Ú·®» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ λ°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» Ó¿¬¬ Ô¿©®·» Ì®¿ºº·½ Û²¹·²»»® ͬ¿ºº Ô·¿·­±² ß¾­»²¬æ п«´ Þ«®»­ Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ λ°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» Ѭ¸»®­ ·² ߬¬»²¼¿²½»æ Ò±²» ßÐÐÎÑÊßÔ ÑÚ Ó×ÒËÌÛÍ Ý±³³·­­·±²»® Þ»²½·½ô ­»½±²¼»¼ ¾§ ݱ³³·­­·±²»® ̱®¬±®»´´±ô ³±ª»¼ ¬± ¿°°®±ª» ¬¸» ³·²«¬»­ ±º ¬¸» ®»¹«´¿® ³»»¬·²¹ ±º ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ¸»´¼ ±² Ó¿®½¸ ïìô îðïïò ̸» ³·²«¬»­ ©»®» ¿°°®±ª»¼ ¾§ ¿ ª±¬» ±º èóðò Ý×Ì×ÆÛÒÍ ÌÑ ÞÛ ØÛßÎÜ Ì¸»®» ©¿­ ²± ±²» ·² ¿¬¬»²¼¿²½» ¬¸¿¬ ­°±µ» ±² ¿² ·­­«» ²±¬ ±² ¬¸» ¿¹»²¼¿ò Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² Ó»»¬·²¹ п¹» ï ±º ë ß°®·´ ïïô îðïï ÑÔÜ ÞËÍ×ÒÛÍÍ ßòÊ×ÔÔßÙÛ ÝÑÜÛ ßÓÛÒÜÓÛÒÌ ÝØßÐÌÛÎ ëæßÎÌ×ÝÔÛ ïðæ ÍßÚÛÌÇ ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ ï÷Þ¿½µ¹®±«²¼ ײº±®³¿¬·±² Ý«®®»²¬ ´¿²¹«¿¹» ·² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ݱ¼» ½¿´´­ º±® ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ¬± ®»ª·»© ¿ ©·¼» ª¿®·»¬§ ±º ·­­«»­ ¾»§±²¼ ¬®¿ºº·½ ·²½´«¼·²¹ ©¿¬»® ¿²¼ ¿·® °±´´«¬·±²ò ͱ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ݱ¼» ¾»¬¬»® ®»º´»½¬­ ¬¸» ¿½¬«¿´ ±¾¶»½¬·ª» ¿²¼ ¼«¬·»­ ±º ¬±¼¿§­ ݱ³³·­­·±²ô ͬ¿ºº ·­ °®±°±­·²¹ ¬± ¿³»²¼ ¬¸» ­»½¬·±² ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ݱ¼» ¬¸¿¬ °»®¬¿·²­ ¬± ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±²ò ̸·­ ·­ ²±¬ ¿² ¿¾±´·¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¾«¬ ®¿¬¸»® ¿ ®»¼»º·²·²¹ ±º ·¬­ °«®°±­»ô ±¾¶»½¬·ª» ¿²¼ ¼«¬·»­ò Ô¿­¬ ³±²¬¸ ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¼·­½«­­»¼ ¬¸» ¼®¿º¬ ±®¼·²¿²½» ¿²¼ °®±ª·¼»¼ ­»ª»®¿´ ½±³³»²¬­ò ̸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ ͬ¿ºº ¸¿­ ®»ª·»©»¼ ¬¸» ½±³³»²¬­ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ߬¬±®²»§ ¿²¼ Ê·´´¿¹» Ó¿²¿¹»®ô ¿²¼ ¸¿­ «°¼¿¬»¼ ¬¸» ±®¼·²¿²½» ¾¿­»¼ ±² ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²­ º»»¼¾¿½µò î÷ Ю±°±­»¼ ß³»²¼³»²¬ ݸ¿°¬»® ëæ ß®¬·½´» È Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ݱ³³·­­·±² ëòïððïæ ÝÎÛßÌ×ÑÒ ßÒÜ ÐËÎÐÑÍÛ Ì¸»®» ·­ ¸»®»¾§ »­¬¿¾´·­¸»¼ ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ¬± ¿­­·­¬ô ·²º±®³ ¿²¼ ¿¼ª·­» ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»­ ­¬¿ºº ¿²¼ »´»½¬»¼ ±ºº·½·¿´­ ±² ³¿¬¬»®­ °»®¬¿·²·²¹ ¬± ¬¸» ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ±º °»±°´» ¿²¼ ³¿¬»®·¿´­ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ¿²¼ ¿¼¶±·²·²¹ ³«²·½·°¿´·¬·»­ô ¿²¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» ²±®¬¸»¿­¬»®² ×´´·²±·­ ®»¹·±² ¿­ ·¬ ¿ºº»½¬­ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ò ëòïððîæ ÓÛÓÞÛÎÍØ×Р̸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ½±²­·­¬ ±º ²·²» øç÷ ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®­ ¿²¼ ±²» øï÷ ²±²ó ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®ô ©¸± ­¸¿´´ ¾» ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ¿­ º±´´±©­æ ßò̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ­¸¿´´ ¿°°±·²¬ ­·¨ øê÷ ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®­ô ²±¬ ·² ¬¸» »³°´±§ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ©¸± ¸¿ª» ¿² ·²¬»®»­¬ ·² ¬¸» ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ±º °»±°´» ¿²¼ ³¿¬»®·¿´­ô ¿²¼ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ­¿º»¬§ò ̸»­» ³»³¾»®­ ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ©·¬¸±«¬ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±²ò Þò̸» ݸ·»º ±º б´·½»ô Ú·®» ݸ·»º ¿²¼ Ü·®»½¬±® ±º Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ ­¸¿´´ ¿­­·¹² ¿ ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» º®±³ ¬¸» Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ б´·½» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ô Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ú·®» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ ¿²¼ Ó±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ô ®»­°»½¬·ª»´§ô ¬± ­»®ª» ±² ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿­ ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»®­ ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±²ò Ýòß ®»°®»­»²¬¿¬·ª» ±º ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½±³°»²­¿¬·±² ¿­ ¿² »¨ ±ºº·½·±ô ²±²ª±¬·²¹ ³»³¾»® ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿²¼ ­¸¿´´ °»®º±®³ ¬¸» ¼«¬·»­ ±º ¬¸» Í»½®»¬¿®§ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ò Üò̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ô ­¸¿´´ ¿°°±·²¬ ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ô ¿²¼ ½±²­·¼»® ¬¸» ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ³»³¾»®­ ·² ­± ¼±·²¹ò ̸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ²± ³±®» ¬¸¿² ¬©± øî÷ ½±²­»½«¬·ª» ¬»®³­ ·² ¬¸» °±­·¬·±²ò Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² Ó»»¬·²¹ п¹» î ±º ë ß°®·´ ïïô îðïï ÛòÊ¿½¿²½·»­ ±² ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¾» º·´´»¼ º±® ¬¸» «²»¨°·®»¼ ¬»®³ ±º ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ±® ¿²§ ³»³¾»® ©¸± ·­ ²±¬ »³°´±§»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ¾§ ¿°°±·²¬³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ò ̸» ¬»®³ ±º ±ºº·½» º±® ³»³¾»®­ô ©¸± ¿®» ²±¬ »³°´±§»¼ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ­¸¿´´ ¾» º±® ¿ °»®·±¼ ±º º±«® øì÷ §»¿®­ ±® «²¬·´ ¬¸»·® ¯«¿´·º·»¼ ­«½½»­­±®­ ¿®» ¿°°±·²¬»¼ò ß²§ ³»³¾»® ­¸¿´´ ¾» »´·¹·¾´» º±® ®»¿°°±·²¬³»²¬ò ̸» ³»³¾»®­ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ­»´»½¬ º®±³ ·¬­ ³»³¾»®­¸·° ¿ Ê·½» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ©¸± ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ¿­ ¿½¬·²¹ ½¸¿·®°»®­±² ©¸»²»ª»® ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ¿°°±·²¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ·­ ¿¾­»²¬ º®±³ ¬¸» ³»»¬·²¹ò ̸» Ê·½» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ­¸¿´´ ­»®ª» ²± ³±®» ¬¸¿² ¬©± øî÷ ½±²­»½«¬·ª» ¬»®³­ ·² ¬¸» °±­·¬·±²ò ̸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ¿¼ª·½» ¿²¼ ½±²­»²¬ ±º ¬¸» Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ô ­¸¿´´ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» °±©»® ¬± ®»³±ª» ¿²§ ³»³¾»® ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ò ëòïððíæ ÑÞÖÛÝÌ×ÊÛ ßÒÜ ÌÑÐ×ÝÍ ÑÚ Ü×ÍÝËÍÍ×ÑÒ Ì¸» ±¾¶»½¬·ª» ±º ¬¸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¾» ¬± »²½±«®¿¹» ¿²¼ º¿½·´·¬¿¬» ­¿º» ¿²¼ »ºº·½·»²¬ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ô ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ¿²¼ ¿¼¶±·²·²¹ ³«²·½·°¿´·¬·»­ô ¿²¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸» ²±®¬¸»¿­¬»®² ×´´·²±·­ ®»¹·±² ¿­ ·¬ ¿ºº»½¬­ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»ò ̸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ º«²½¬·±² ¿­ ¿¼ª·­±® ¬± Ê·´´¿¹» ­¬¿ººô ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ±² ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ¬±°·½­æ ßò̸» »ºº·½·»²¬ ¿²¼ ­¿º» ³±ª»³»²¬ ±º ª»¸·½´»­ô ¾·½§½´»­ ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ ¿´±²¹ Ê·´´¿¹»ô ݱ«²¬§ ¿²¼ ͬ¿¬» ®±¿¼­ò ÞòÍ¿º»¬§ °´¿²­ ¿®±«²¼ ­½¸±±´­ô ½¸«®½¸»­ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ´±½¿¬·±²­ ¬¸¿¬ ¹»²»®¿¬» ¿ ¸·¹¸ ´»ª»´ ±º ª»¸·½´»ñ°»¼»­¬®·¿² ·²¬»®¿½¬·±²ò ÝòÞ·½§½´» ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ·²º®¿­¬®«½¬«®» °®±¶»½¬­ ·² ­«°°±®¬ ±º ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹»­ ݱ³°®»¸»²­·ª» д¿² ¿²¼ Þ·½§½´» д¿²ò ÜòѲ󭬮»»¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ¿²¼ Ê·´´¿¹»ó±©²»¼ °¿®µ·²¹ ´±¬­ò ÛòÓ¿­­ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¬®¿·²­ô ¾«­»­ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ­«½¸ ³»¿²­ò ÚòÓ«´¬·ó¶«®·­¼·½¬·±² ¿²¼ ®»¹·±²¿´ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ·­­«»­ò ëòïððìæ ÜËÌ×ÛÍ ×² ¿¼ª·­·²¹ ¿²¼ ¿­­·­¬·²¹ Ê·´´¿¹» ­¬¿ººô ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ô ¬¸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¸¿ª» ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¼«¬·»­æ ßò̱ ®»ª·»© ¿²¼ ½±²­·¼»® ¬±°·½­ ¼»­½®·¾»¼ ·² Í»½¬·±² ëòïððí ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ¼»ô ¿²¼ ¬± ®»½±³³»²¼ ­«½¸ ¿½¬·±²ô ¿­ ·¬ ¼»»³­ ¿°°®±°®·¿¬»ô ¬± ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ò Þò̱ ½±²­·¼»® ¿²¼ ³¿µ» ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ±² ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ·­­«»­ô ¿­ ¼·®»½¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ò Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² Ó»»¬·²¹ п¹» í ±º ë ß°®·´ ïïô îðïï Ýò̱ °®±ª·¼» º»»¼¾¿½µ ¿²¼ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ¬± Ê·´´¿¹» ­¬¿ºº ±² ´±½¿´ ¿²¼ ®»¹·±²¿´ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² °®±¶»½¬­ ¿²¼ °®±¹®¿³­ °®»­»²¬»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¾§ ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ±® ±¬¸»®­ò Üò̱ ½®»¿¬» ¿² ±°»² ¿¬³±­°¸»®» ¬¸¿¬ ¿´´±©­ ¬¸» °«¾´·½ ¬± ½±³³«²·½¿¬» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ¿²¼ °¿®¬·½·°¿¬» ·² ·¬­ ³»»¬·²¹­ò Ûò̱ ·²ª·¬» ¿²¼ »²½±«®¿¹» ½±³³«²·¬§ ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±²­ ­«½¸ ¿­ ­½¸±±´­ô ½¸«®½¸»­ô ¸±³»±©²»® ¿­­±½·¿¬·±²­ ¿²¼ ½·ª·½ ¹®±«°­ ¬± °¿®¬·½·°¿¬» ·² ¬¸» ©±®µ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²ò Úò̱ ­«¾³·¬ ½±®®»­°±²¼»²½» ¬± ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» Ю»­·¼»²¬ ¿²¼ Þ±¿®¼ ±º Ì®«­¬»»­ ±² ¿´´ ¿½¬·ª·¬·»­ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ·²½´«¼·²¹ô ¾«¬ ²±¬ ´·³·¬»¼ ¬±ô ¿¹»²¼¿­ô ³»»¬·²¹ ³·²«¬»­ ¿²¼ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ò Ùò̱ ®»¯«»­¬ ­¬¿¬·­¬·½¿´ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ·²º±®³¿¬·±² º®±³ Ê·´´¿¹» ¼»°¿®¬³»²¬­ º±® ®»ª·»© ·² ®»´¿¬·±² ¬± ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±²­ ¼«¬·»­ò Øò̱ ½±²­·¼»® ¿°°»¿´­ º®±³ ¼»½·­·±²­ ±º ¬¸» Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ Ü·ª·­·±² ©·¬¸ ®»­°»½¬ ¬± ­·¹¸¬ ±¾­¬®«½¬·±²­ô ¿­ °®±ª·¼»¼ ·² Í»½¬·±² çòíðè ±º ¬¸·­ ݱ¼»ò ëòïððëæ ÓÛÛÌ×ÒÙÍ Ì¸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ³»»¬ ±² ¬¸» ­»½±²¼ Ó±²¼¿§ ±º »¿½¸ ³±²¬¸ «²´»­­ ²±¬·½» ±º ½¿²½»´´¿¬·±² ·­ ¹·ª»² ¾§ ¬¸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ±® Ü·®»½¬±® ±º Ы¾´·½ ɱ®µ­ò ̸» ݸ¿·®°»®­±² ³¿§ ½¿´´ º±® ­°»½·¿´ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿­ ²»»¼»¼ò ̸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¿¼±°¬ ®«´»­ º±® ¬¸» ½±²¼«½¬ ±º ·¬­ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ µ»»° ©®·¬¬»² ³·²«¬»­ ±º ¿´´ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ °®±½»»¼·²¹­ò ß´´ ³»»¬·²¹­ ¿²¼ ¿½¬·±²­ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ­¸¿´´ ¾» ½±²¼«½¬»¼ ·² ¿½½±®¼¿²½» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ®»¯«·®»³»²¬­ ±º ¬¸» ×´´·²±·­ Ñ°»² Ó»»¬·²¹­ ß½¬ò í÷ Ü·­½«­­·±² Ì®¿ºº·½ Û²¹·²»»® Ô¿©®·» ©»²¬ ±ª»® ¬¸» ½¸¿²¹»­ ¬± ¬¸» ±®¼·²¿²½» ­·²½» ¬¸» ´¿­¬ ³»»¬·²¹ò ݱ³³·­­·±²»® Þ»²½·½ ¿­µ»¼ ¿ ½±«°´» ±º ½´¿®·º§·²¹ ¯«»­¬·±²­ò ̸»®» ©¿­ ¿¹®»»³»²¬ º®±³ ¬¸» ³»³¾»®­ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ½¸¿²¹»­ ¸¿ª» ¿¼¼®»­­»¼ ¬¸»·® °®»ª·±«­ ½±³³»²¬­ò ݱ³³·­­·±²»® Ú·­¸»® ³¿¼» ¿ ³±¬·±² ¬± ¿°°®±ª» ¬¸» «°¼¿¬»¼ ±®¼·²¿²½» ¬¸¿¬ ®»°´¿½»­ ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ ´¿²¹«¿¹» ·² ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ݱ¼»ò ̸» ±®¼·²¿²½» ®»¼»º·²»­ ¬¸» °«®°±­»ô ±¾¶»½¬·ª» ¿²¼ ¼«¬·»­ ±º ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ·²½´«¼·²¹ ½¸¿²¹·²¹ ¬¸» ²¿³» ¬± ¬¸» Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±²ò ׬ ©¿­ ­»½±²¼»¼ ¾§ ݱ³³·­­·±² п³°»´ò Û¿½¸ ³»³¾»® ©¿­ ¿­µ»¼ ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´´§ ¬¸»·® ª±¬»ò ̸» ³±¬·±² ©¿­ ¿°°®±ª»¼ ¾§ ¿ ª±¬» ±º èóðò ÒÛÉ ÞËÍ×ÒÛÍÍ Ì¸»®» ©¿­ ²± ²»© ¾«­·²»­­ ¬± ¼·­½«­­ò ÝÑÓÓ×ÍÍ×ÑÒ ×ÍÍËÛÍ Ì®¿ºº·½ Û²¹·²»»® Ô¿©®·» ­«³³¿®·¦»¼ ¬¸» ¿°°´·½¿¬·±²­ ­«¾³·¬¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ¿­ °¿®¬ ±º ¬¸» ÝÓßÏ Ð®±¹®¿³ò Ø» ¬±«½¸»¼ ±² ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ °±¬»²¬·¿´ °®±¶»½¬­æ Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² Ó»»¬·²¹ п¹» ì ±º ë ß°®·´ ïïô îðïï ïòÙ±´º α¿¼ ݱ®®·¼±® Þ·µ» ᫬» îòÕ»²­·²¹¬±² α¿¼ ͸¿®»¼ Ë­» п¬¸ íòÓ»´¿­óÓ»¿¼±©­ Þ®·¼¹» ìòο²¼óèíóÕ»²­·²¹¬±² ײ¬»®­»½¬·±² ͬ«¼§ ëòο²¼óÝ»²¬®¿´óÓ±«²¬ Ю±­°»½¬ ײ¬»®­»½¬·±² ͬ«¼§ Ì®¿ºº·½ Û²¹·²»»® Ô¿©®·» ­¿·¼ ¬¸» Ê·´´¿¹» ­¸±«´¼ µ²±© ©¸»¬¸»® ¿²§ ±º ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬­ ¸¿ª» ¾»»² ¿½½»°¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ®»ª·»© ½±³³·¬¬»» ·² ß«¹«­¬ò Ø» ©·´´ µ»»° ¬¸» ݱ³³·­­·±² ·²º±®³»¼ ±² ¬¸» ­¬¿¬«­ ±º ¬¸»­» °®±¶»½¬­ò ̸»®» ©¿­ ­±³» ¹»²»®¿´ ¼·­½«­­·±² ±² ¬¸» ­¬¿¬«­ ±º ¬¸» ÍÌßÎ Ô·²» Ю±¶»½¬ ¿²¼ Û´¹·²óÑØ¿®» É»­¬»®² Þ§°¿­­ Ю±¶»½¬ò Ì®¿ºº·½ Û²¹·²»»® Ô¿©®·» ­¿·¼ ¸» ¾»´·»ª»¼ ¬¸» ÍÌßÎ Ô·²» Ю±¶»½¬ ©¿­ ®«²²·²¹ ·²¬± º«²¼·²¹ ·­­«»­ ¿²¼ ©±«´¼²±¬ ¾» ³±ª·²¹ º±®©¿®¼ ¿²§¬·³» ­±±²ò ر©»ª»®ô ¬¸» ͬ¿¬» ¸¿­ °®±¹®¿³³»¼ º«²¼­ º±® ¬¸» Û´¹·²óÑØ¿®» É»­¬»®² Þ§°¿­­ Ю±¶»½¬ô ¿²¼ »²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ ¿²¼ ¼»­·¹² ­¬«¼·»­ ¿®» °®±½»»¼·²¹ò ݱ³³·­­·±²»® ̱®¬±®»´´± ¾®±«¹¸¬ «° ¬¸» ·­­«» ©¸»¬¸»® ¹±´º ½¿®¬­ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ­·³·´¿® ³±¬±®·¦»¼ ª»¸·½´»­ ¿®» ¿´´±©»¼ ±² ¬¸» ®±¿¼ ©·¬¸±«¬ ¬¸» ¼®·ª»® ¸¿ª·²¹ ¿ ´·½»²­»ò Ѻº·½»® ͳ·¬¸ ®»­°±²¼»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ­«½¸ ³±¬±®·­¬­ ¿®» ¬± ¸¿ª» ¿ ª¿´·¼ ´·½»²­» ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ½±²½»®²»¼ ³±¬±®·­¬­ ½¿² ½±²¬¿½¬ ¬¸» б´·½» Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ ·º ¬¸»§ ©·¬²»­­ ­«½¸ ¿ ª»¸·½´» ·²¸·¾·¬·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ò ßÜÖÑËÎÒÓÛÒÌ É·¬¸ ²± º«®¬¸»® ¾«­·²»­­ ¬± ¼·­½«­­ô ¬¸» Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² ª±¬»¼ èó𠬱 ¿¼¶±«®² ¿¬ éæìî °ò³ò «°±² ¬¸» ³±¬·±² ±º ݱ³³·­­·±²»® Þ»²½·½ò ݱ³³·­­·±²»® Ý¿³°±­ ­»½±²¼»¼ ¬¸» ³±¬·±²ò λ­°»½¬º«´´§ ­«¾³·¬¬»¼ô Ó¿¬¬¸»© Ðò Ô¿©®·»ô ÐòÛò Ì®¿ºº·½ Û²¹·²»»® ¸æÄ»²¹·²»»®·²¹Ä¬®¿ºº·½Ä­¿º»¬§Á½±³³·­­·±²Ä®»½­ú³·²­Ä¿°®·´ïï³·²ò¼±½ Í¿º»¬§ ݱ³³·­­·±² Ó»»¬·²¹ п¹» ë ±º ë ß°®·´ ïïô îðïï ORDINANCE NO. ______________________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5, ENTITLED, OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: Commissions as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting Sections 5.1001, 5.1002, 5.1003 and 5.1004 in their entirety and adding new ARTICLE X TRANSPORTATION SAFETY COMMISSION SECTION: 5.1001Creation and Purpose 5.1002Membership 5.1003Objectives and Topics of Discussion 5.1004Duties 5.1005Meetings Section 5.1001:CREATION AND PURPOSE There is hereby established the Mount Prospect Transportation Safety Commission to assist, inf transportation of people and materials within the Village, between the Village and adjoining municipalities, and throughout the northeastern Illinois region as it affects the Village. Section 5.1002:MEMBERSHIP The Transportation Safety Commission shall consist of nine (9) voting members and one (1) non-voting member, who shall be appointed as follows: A. The Village President with the advice and consent of the Board of Trustees shall appoint six (6) voting members, not in the employ of the Village, who have an interest in the transportation of people and materials, and transportation safety. These members shall serve without compensation. B. The Chief of Police, Fire Chief and Director of Public Works shall assign a representative from the Mount Prospect Police Department, Mount Prospect Fire Department and Mount Prospect Public Works Department, respectively, to serve on the Commission as voting members without additional compensation. C. A representative of the Engineering Division shall serve without additional compensation as an ex officio, nonvoting member of the Commission and shall perform the duties of the Secretary of the Commission. D. The Village President, with the advice and consent of the Board of Trustees, shall appoint the Chairperson of the Commission, and consider the recommendation of the Commission members in so doing. The Chairperson shall serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms in the position. E. Vacancies on the Commission shall be filled for the unexpired term of the Chairperson or any member who is not employed by the Village, by appointment of the Village President with the consent of the Board of Trustees. The term of office for members, who are not employed of the Village, shall be for a period of four (4) years or until their qualified successors are appointed. Any member shall be eligible for reappointment. The members of the Commission shall select from its membership a Vice Chairperson who shall serve as acting chairperson whenever the Chairperson appointed by the Village President is absent from the meeting. The Vice Chairperson shall serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms in the position. The Village President, with the advice and consent of the Board of Trustees, shall have the power to remove any member of the Commission. Section 5.1003: OBJECTIVE AND TOPICS OF DISCUSSION The objective of the Transportation Safety Commission shall be to encourage and facilitate safe and efficient transportation throughout the Village, between the Village and adjoining municipalities, and throughout the northeastern Illinois region as it affects the Village. The Commission shall function as advisor to Village staff, the Village President and Board of Trustees on the following transportation topics: A. The efficient and safe movement of vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians along Village, County and State roads. B. Safety plans around schools, churches and other locations that generate a high level of vehicle/pedestrian interaction. C. Comprehensive Plan and Bicycle Plan. D. On-street parking and Village-owned parking lots. E. Mass transportation including trains, buses and other such means. F. Multi-jurisdiction and regional transportation issues. Section 5.1004: DUTIES In advising and assisting Village staff, the Village President and Board of Trustees, the Transportation Safety Commission shall have the following duties: A. To review and consider topics described in Section 5.1003 of this Code, and to recommend such action, as it deems appropriate, to the Village President and Board of Trustees. B. To consider and make recommendations on transportation issues, as directed by the Village President and Board of Trustees. C. To provide feedback and recommendations to Village staff on local and regional transportation projects and programs presented to the Commission by the Engineering Division or others. D. To create an open atmosphere that allows the public to communicate with the Commission and participate in its meetings. E. To invite and encourage community organizations such as schools, churches, homeowner associations and civic groups to participate in the work of the Commission. F. To submit correspondence to the Village President and Board of Trustees on all activities of the Commission including, but not limited to, agendas, meeting minutes and recommendations. G. To request statistical and other information from Village departments for review in H. To consider appeals from decisions of the Engineering Division with respect to sight obstructions, as provided in Section 9.308 of this Code. Section 5.1005: MEETINGS The Transportation Safety Commission shall meet on the second Monday of each month unless notice of cancellation is given by the Chairperson or Director of Public Works. The Chairperson may call for special meetings as needed. The Commission shall adopt rules for the conduct of its meetings and keep written minutes of all meetings and proceedings. All meetings and actions of the Commission shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Illinois Open Meetings Act. SECTION TWO : This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _____________ day of _____________, 2011. ______________________ Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: ____________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED ‘TRAFFIC CODE’ OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE : That Section 18.2002, “SCHEDULE II – PROHIBITED TURNS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: Direction of Prohibited Into “Name of Street Traffic Movement Turn (Name of Street) Busse Avenue Westbound Left Wille Street Central Road Westbound Left Hi-Lusi Avenue Crestwood Lane Northbound Left Estates Drive during school hours Crestwood Lane Southbound Right Estates Drive during school hours Elm Street Northbound Right Busse Avenue during school hours Elm Street Southbound Left Busse Avenue during school hours Elm Street Northbound Right Council Trail during school hours Elm Street Southbound Left Council Trail during school hours Elm Street Northbound Right Highland Avenue Henry Street Eastbound Right Albert Street Henry Street Westbound Left Albert Street Henry Street Eastbound Left Owen Street during school hours Henry Street Westbound Right Owen Street during school hours Isabella Street Eastbound Left Fairview Avenue during school hours Isabella Street Westbound Right Fairview Avenue during school hours Lincoln Street Eastbound Left Can-Dota Avenue during school hours Lincoln Street Westbound Right Can-Dota Avenue during school hours page 1 of 18 Direction of Prohibited Into Name of Street Traffic Movement Turn (Name of Street) Linneman Road Northbound Left Church Street Linneman Road Southbound Right Church Street Northwest Highway Southeast bound Left Forest Avenue (7 A.M. to 9 A. M. only) Owen Street Northbound Right Henry Street during school hours Owen Street Southbound Left Henry Street during school hours.” SECTION TWO : That Section 18.2002, “SCHEDULE II – PROHITBITED TURNS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: Direction of “Name of Street Traffic Movement Prohibited Turn Into (Name of Street) Center Commuter Lot Northbound Left Northwest Highway Illinois Rte. 83 Southbound Left Milburn Avenue Emerson Street Northbound Left Central Road (4 P.M. to 6:30 P.M.) Illinois Rte. 83 Southbound Right Milburn Avenue Pheasant Trail Eastbound Left Tamarack Drive (school days btw. 8 A.M. and 4 P.M.) Tamarack Drive Southbound Left Pheasant Trail (school days btw. 8 A.M. and 4 P.M.).” SECTION THREE : That Section 18.2002, “SCHEDULE II – PROHIBITED TURNS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: Direction of “Name of Street Traffic Movement Prohibited Turn Into (Name of Street) Elmhurst Road Change to Illinois Rte. 83Southbound Left Kensington Road Elmhurst Road Change to Illinois Rte. 83Northbound Right Rand Road Illinois Rte. 83 Northbound Change to EastboundLeft Pine Street Illinois Rte. 83 Southbound Change to WestboundLeft Wille Street Prospect Mn Change to Prospect Manor Northbound Left Rand Road (weekdays from 4 Avenue P.M. to 7 P.M.) Rand Road Northwestbound Left Elmhurst Road Change to Illinois Rte. 83 Rte. 83 Change to Illinois Rte. 83 Northbound Left Milburn Avenue Rte. 83 Change to Illinois Rte. 83 Southbound Left Milburn Avenue page 2 of 18 Name of Street Traffic Movement Prohibited Turn Into (Name of Street) West Commuter Lot Eastbound Left Rte. 83 Change to Illinois Rte. 83.” SECTION FOUR : That Section 18.2003, “SCHEDULE III - ONE-WAY STREETS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: Direction of “Name of Street Traffic Movement Description Albert Street Northbound Btw. Central Road and Henry Street Can-Dota Avenue Southbound School hours btw. Lincoln Street and Milburn Avenue Elmhurst Avenue Southbound Btw. Lincoln Street and Illinois Rte. 83 Elmhurst Avenue Southbound Btw. Milburn Avenue and Lincoln Street (school days btw. 8:15 A.M. to 8:45 A.M. and 2:30 P.M. to 3 P.M.) Evergreen Avenue Eastbound Btw. Maple Street and Elm Street Gregory Street Eastbound School hours between Oak Avenue and Fairview Street Henry Street Westbound School hours btw. Owen Street and William Street Lincoln Street Westbound Btw. Elmhurst Avenue and Illinois Rte. 83 Owen Street Southbound School hours btw. Thayer Street and Henry Street Serafine Drive Westbound Btw. Albert Street and Rand Road.” SECTION FIVE : That Section 18.2003, “SCHEDULE III - ONE-WAY STREETS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: Direction of “Name of Street Traffic Movement Description Busse Avenue Westbound Btw. Main Street and Wille Street Change to Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Wille Street.” SECTION SIX : That Section 18.2005, “SCHEDULE V - NO STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Between Hours Of Description Aspen Drive West School days 8 A.M. to 9:30 A.M.. Btw. Maya Lane and Aztec and 3 P.M. to 4 P.M Lane Boxwood Drive S. North At any time The first 20 feet west of Wheeling Road Busse Road East and West At any time Entire jurisdiction south of Lonnquist Blvd. Central Road East and West At any time On or within 13 feet of the railroad tracks Council Trail Circumference of center island At any time At Wa Pella Avenue Dempster Street North and South At any time Entire jurisdiction Dogwood Lane South At any time The first 20 feet east of Boxwood Drive page 3 of 18 Name of Street Side of Street Between Hours Of Description Dogwood Lane South At any time The first 20 feet west of Boxwood Drive Elm Street East and West 10 P.M. to 6 A.M. First 316 feet south of Highland Avenue Emerson Street West At any time From a point 260 feet south of Central Road to a point 475 feet south of Central Road Emerson Street East and West At any time On or within 13 feet of the railroad tracks Euclid Avenue North and South At any time On or within 13 feet of the railroad tracks Euclid Avenue North and South At any time Entire jurisdiction Evergreen Avenue North At any time Btw. Maple Street and a point 100 feet west of Elm Street Fairview Avenue East and West School days 10 A.M. to 11 A.M. Btw. Memory Lane and and 1 P.M. to 2 P.M Kensington Road Forest Avenue East School days Btw. Kensington Road to 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. Memory Lane Golf Road North and South At any time Entire jurisdiction Gregory Street North At any time Btw. Main Street and Wille Street Harvest Lane North and South At any time The first 450 feet east of Business Center Drive Henry Street North At any time The first 35 feet east of Owen Street Heritage Drive North and South At any time The first 500 feet east of Wolf Road Highland Avenue North and South At any time The first 35 feet west of Main Street Highland Avenue North and South School days Btw. Forest Avenue and 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. Fairview Avenue Highland Street North and South School days Btw. Fairview Avenue and 10 A.M. to 11 A.M. Eastwood Avenue and 1 P.M. to 2 P.M. Kensington Road North and South At any time Btw. River Road and a point 250 feet west of River Road Kensington Road North and South At any time On or within 13 feet of the railroad tracks Main Street East and West At any time Btw. Central Road and Evergreen Avenue Main Street (Rte. 83) East and West At any time On or within 13 feet of the railroad tracks Maple Street East At any time Btw. Council Trail and Moehling Drive page 4 of 18 Name of Street Side of Street Between Hours Of Description Memory Lane North and South School days Btw. Forest Avenue and 10 A.M. to 11 A.M. Prospect Manor Avenue and 1 P.M. to 2 P.M East Milburn Avenue South At any time Btw. Main Street and Emerson Street Mount Prospect Road East and West At any time On or within 13 feet of the railroad tracks Nordic Road West At any time The south 35 feet of the north 600 feet south of Algonquin Road Prospect Avenue North At any time Btw. Maple Street and a point 335 feet east of Emerson Street Prospect Manor Avenue East and West School days Btw. Memory Lane and 10 A.M. to 11 A.M. Kensington Road and 1 P.M. to 2 P.M River Road East and West At any time Btw. Council Trail and a point 200 feet north of Council Trail Wa Pella Avenue East and West At any time Btw. Council Trail and a point 200 feet north of Council Trail Wheeling Road East At any time The first 300 feet south of Euclid Avenue Wheeling Road West At any time The first 20 feet north of Boxwood Drive North Wheeling Road West At any time The first 20 feet south of Boxwood Drive North Wheeling Road West At any time The first 20 feet north of Dogwood Lane Wheeling Road West At any time The first 20 feet south of Dogwood Lane Wheeling Road West At any time The first 20 feet north of Boxwood Drive South Wheeling Road West At any time The first 20 feet south of Boxwood Drive South.” SECTION SEVEN : That Section 18.2005, “SCHEDULE V - NO STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Between Hours Of Description Prospect Avenue South At any time The first 180 feet west of Maple Street Wheeling Road East and West At any time The first 350 feet south of Euclid Avenue.” SECTION EIGHT : That Section 18.2005, “SCHEDULE V - NO STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: page 5 of 18 “Name of Street Side of Street Between Hours Of Description Prospect Avenue South At any time The first 70 feet west of Route 83 Change to The first 70 feet west of Illinois Rte. 83.” SECTION NINE : That Section 18.2006, “SCHEDULE VI - NO PARKING ANYTIME,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Alley entered from Wa Pella St. 119.98 feet south of West Central Rd. North and South The first 155.62 feet west of Wa Pella St. Briarwood Road East Btw. Briarwood Road and Algonquin Road Busse Avenue North The first 120 feet east of Main Street Busse Avenue South The first 120 feet east of Main Street, excluding therefrom the area from a point 30 feet east of Main Street to a point 95 east of Main Street Busse Avenue South The first 154 feet east of Emerson Street Busse Avenue South From 155 feet east of the east edge of Main Street to a point 190 feet east of the east edge of Main Street Cathy Lane East and West (Ord. 5281) The first 500 feet north of Central Road Council Trail North Btw. See-Gwun and Hi-Lusi Avenues Council Trail South Btw. Route 83 and See-Gwun Avenue Emerson Street East Btw. 195 feet and 295 feet south of the south line of Busse Avenue Emerson Street East Central Road to a point 60 feet south of the south edge of Central Road Emerson Street West Btw. 300 feet north of Milburn Avenue and Weller Creek Emerson Street West Central Road to a point 45 feet south of the south edge of Central Road Emerson Street West From 180 feet south of the south edge of Busse Avenue to a point 205 feet south of the south edge of Busse Avenue Gregory Street North The first 150 feet east of Main Street Grove Drive South and East Btw. Golf Road and Tamarack Drive Henry Street South Btw. Main Street and 150 feet west thereof Henry Street South Btw. Owen Street and William Street Lakeview Court East and West Entire jurisdiction Lincoln Street North and South Btw. Elmhurst Avenue and Illinois Route 83 Lonnquist Boulevard North and South Btw. Crestwood Lane and Deborah Lane South lane of Lonnquist Boulevard North Btw. Can-Dota Avenue and Wa-Pella Avenue page 6 of 18 Name of Street Side of Street Description Louis Street East The first 50 feet north of Thayer Street Midway Drive South Btw. Elmhurst Road and a point 420 feet west thereof Mount Prospect Road East and West West side btw. Rand Road and Busse Avenue and east side btw. Rand Road and a distance 300 feet south of Central Road Mount Prospect Road West Btw. Central Road and Northwest Highway Prospect Avenue South Btw. Edward Street and Mount Prospect Road Prospect Avenue South Btw. Maple Street and Mount Prospect Road Prospect Avenue South The first 131 feet west of Maple Street Sha Bonee Trail North The first 30 feet east of William Street Sha Bonee Trail South The first 30 feet west of William Street Thayer Street North The first 140 feet east of Main Street, excluding therefrom the easterly 80 feet Wa-Pella Avenue West Btw. Lonquist Boulevard and a point 696 feet south of Lonnquist Boulevard Wheeling Road East Btw. Euclid Avenue and Kensington Road Wheeling Road East and West The first 300 feet south of Euclid Avenue Wille Street East and West The first 200 feet south of Evergreen Avenue William Street East The first 30 feet south of Sha Bonee Trail William Street West The first 30 feet north of Sha Bonee Trail.” SECTION TEN : That Section 18.2006, “SCHEDULE VI - NO PARKING ANYTIME,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: “Name of StreetSide of StreetDescription Briarwood Drive East and West Btw. Briarwood Drive East and Algonquin Road Busse Avenue North The first 140 feet east of Illinois Rte. 83 Busse Road East and West Entire jurisdiction Cathy Lane West (Ord. 5281) The first 500 feet north of Central Road Council Trail North and South Btw. See Gwun Avenue and Illinois Rte. 83 Dogwood Lane North Btw. Boxwood Lane and Wheeling Road Emerson Street East and West From a point 170 feet south to 310 feet south of Busse Avenue Emerson Street East The first 130 feet south of Central Road Emerson Street West Btw. 230 feet north of Milburn Avenue and Weller Creek Emerson Street West Btw. Central Road and Busse Avenue except from points 90 feet to 115 feet and 200 feet to 240 feet south of Central Road page 7 of 18 Name of StreetSide of StreetDescription Evergreen Avenue North The first 170 feet east of Maple Street Grove Drive South and East Entire jurisdiction Harvest Lane North and South The first 450 feet east of Business Center Drive Heritage Drive North and South The first 500 feet east of Wolf Road Ida Court Inner section Entire jurisdiction Kingston Court East and West Entire jurisdiction Memory Lane North and South East of Elm Street Midway Drive North and South Entire jurisdiction Milburn Avenue South Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Emerson Street Mount Prospect Road East and West Entire jurisdiction Owen Street East The first 110 feet south of Central Road Prospect Avenue North and South Btw. Edward Street and Mount Prospect Road Prospect Avenue North The first 200 feet south of Central Road Prospect Avenue North The first 100 feet east of Illinois Rte. 83 Prospect Avenue North The first 110 feet east of Emerson Street Prospect Avenue North The first 60 feet west of Maple Street Prospect Avenue South Btw. Central Road and Hi Lusi Avenue Prospect Avenue South The first 110 feet east of Illinois Rte. 83 Prospect Avenue South The first 110 feet west of Emerson Street Sha Bonee Trail North Btw. We Go Trail and See Gwun Avenue Sha Bonee Trail North The first 120 feet west of Maple Street Wheeling Road East Btw. Kensington Road and a point 350 feet south of Euclid Avenue Wheeling Road West The first 20 feet north of Boxwood Drive North Wheeling Road West The first 20 feet south of Boxwood Drive North Wheeling Road West The first 20 feet north of Boxwood Drive South Wheeling Road West The first 20 feet south of Boxwood Drive South Wheeling Road East and West Btw. Kensington Road and Business Center Drive Wille Street East The first 150 feet south of Evergreen Avenue.” SECTION ELEVEN : That Section 18.2006, “SCHEDULE VI - NO PARKING ANYTIME,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Busse Avenue North The first 120 feet east of Main Street Change to The first 130 feet east of Illinois Rte. 83 Cottonwood Avenue North Btw. Linneman Road and Busse Road Change to Cottonwood Lane page 8 of 18 Name of Street Side of Street Description Huntington Commons North and South At any time, entire jurisdiction Change to Huntington Commons RoadChange to Entire jurisdiction Prospect Avenue North and South East of Lancaster Avenue Change to The first 100 feet east of Lancaster Street Shabonee Trail North Btw. Elmhurst Road and I-Oka Avenue Change to Illinois Rte. 83 and I-Oka Avenue Shabonee Trail North and South The first 150 feet east of Elmhurst Avenue Change to The first 50 feet east of Illinois Rte. 83 Thayer Street North Btw. 65 feet and 85 feet west of Main Street Change to Btw. 65 feet and 85 feet west of Illinois Rte. 83 Thayer Street South Btw. 90 feet and 180 feet west of Main Street Change to Btw. 90 feet and 180 feet west of Illinois Rte. 83.” SECTION TWELVE: That Section 18.2007, “SCHEDULE VII - SUNDAY PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Hours Prohibited Description Wille Street West 6:30 A.M. to 1:30 P.M. Btw. Lincoln Street and 150 feet north of Milburn Avenue.” SECTION THIRTEEN : That Section 18.2007, “SCHEDULE VII - SUNDAY PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Hours Prohibited Description Wille Street West 6:30 A.M. to 1:30 P.M. Btw. Lincoln Street and Milburn Avenue Wille Street West 8:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. The first 150 feet north of Milburn Avenue.” SECTION FOURTEEN : That Section 18.2007, “SCHEDULE VII - SUNDAY PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Hours Prohibited Description Sha Bonee Trail South 6:30 A.M. to 1:30 P.M. Btw. I-Oka Avenue and Elmhurst Avenue Change to Btw. I-Oka Avenue and Illinois Rte. 83.” SECTION FIFTEEN: That Section 18.2008, “SCHEDULE VIII - WEEKDAY PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Hours Prohibited Description I-Oka Avenue East 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. The first 180 feet south of Milburn Avenue Milburn Avenue South 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. Btw. I-Oka Avenue and Elmhurst Avenue Prospect Avenue North 6:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. Btw. Elmhurst Road and Hi- Lusi Avenue.” page 9 of 18 SECTION SIXTEEN: That Section 18.2008, “SCHEDULE VIII - WEEKDAY PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the : following “Name of Street Side of Street Hours Prohibited Description Henry Street South 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Wille Street Edward Street West 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Btw. Sha Bonee Trail and Sha Bonee Alley Sunset Road South At Any Time Btw. William Street and Edward Street William Street West At Any Time Btw. Golf Road and Berkshire Lane.” SECTION SEVENTEEN : That Section 18.2008, “SCHEDULE VIII - WEEKDAY PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Hours Prohibited Description Cathy Lane East and West At any time The first 500 feet north of Change to EastCentral Road.” (Ord. 5361) SECTION EIGHTEEN : That Section 18.2009A, “SCHEDULE IX - PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Council Trail North Btw. a point 220 feet west of School Street Fairview Avenue East Btw. Memory Lane and Gregory Street Gregory Street North Btw. Elm Street and William Street Lonnquist Boulevard South Btw. Can Dota Avenue and Wa Pella Avenue Owen Street East The first 300 feet north of Henry Street.” SECTION NINETEEN : That Section 18.2009A, “SCHEDULE IX - PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further : amended by inserting the following “Name of Street Side of Street Description Fairview Avenue East Btw. Memory Lane and 300 feet south of Isabella Street Maple Street East Btw. Moehling Drive and Berkshire Lane.” SECTION TWENTY : That Section 18.2009B, “SCHEDULE IX - PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Fairview Avenue East and West Btw. Memory Lane and Kensington Road Highland Street North and South Btw. Fairview Avenue and Eastwood Avenue Memory Lane North and South Btw. Forest Avenue and Prospect Manor Avenue Prospect Manor Avenue East and West Btw. Memory Lane and Kensington Road.” page 10 of 18 SECTION TWENTY-ONE :That Section 18.2009C, “SCHEDULE IX - PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Aspen Drive West Btw. Maya Lane and Aztec Lane 8:00 A.M. to 9:30 A.M. and 3:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. Forest Avenue East Btw. Memory Lane and Kensington Road 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Highland Street North and South Btw. Forest Avenue and Fairview Avenue 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. I Oka Avenue East The first 180 feet south of Milburn Avenue 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. Milburn Avenue South Btw. I-Oka Avenue and Elmhurst Avenue 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M.” SECTION TWENTY-TWO : That Section 18.2011A, “SCHEDULE XI - TWO HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : deleting the following “Name of Street Side of Street Description Busse Avenue South The first 174 feet west of Emerson Street, excluding the easternmost 154 feet thereof Busse Avenue South The first 60 feet east of Main Street, excluding the westernmost 30 feet thereof Emerson Street West Btw. Prospect Avenue and 200 feet north of Milburn Avenue Emerson Street West Btw. Central Road and Northwest Highway Evergreen Avenue North and South Btw. Maple Street and a point 100 feet west of Elm Street Evergreen Avenue South Btw. Maple Street and Elm Street Evergreen Avenue South Btw. Elm Street and School Street Evergreen Avenue North and South Btw. Wille Street and Main Street Evergreen Avenue South The first 150 feet east of Pine Street Northwest Highway North Btw. Louis Street and 180 feet east of William Street Northwest Highway North Btw. William Street and School Street Northwest Highway North Btw. Prospect Manor Avenue and Fairview Avenue Prospect Avenue North Btw. a point 94 feet east of Main Street and a point 110 feet west of Emerson Street Prospect Avenue North and south Btw. Emerson Street and Maple Street Prospect Avenue South Btw. Emerson Street and Main Street Ridge Avenue East Btw. Central Road and a point 170 feet north of Central Road Ridge Avenue West Btw. Central Road and Walnut Street School Street West Btw. Evergreen Avenue and Northwest Highway Village Hall Parking Lot Adjacent to the rear and south side of municipal building page 11 of 18 when so signposted.” SECTION TWENTY-THREE : That Section 18.2011A, “SCHEDULE XI - TWO HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: “Name of StreetSide of StreetDescription Busse Avenue South Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Emerson Street Emerson Street West Btw. Prospect Avenue and 230 feet north of Milburn Avenue Emerson Street West From points 90 feet to 115 feet and 200 feet to 240 feet south of Central Road Emerson Street East and West Btw. Northwest Highway and Busse Avenue except from a point 170 feet south to 310 feet south of Busse Avenue Emerson Street East Btw. Central Road and Busse Avenue except the first 130 feet south of Central Road Evergreen Avenue South The first 170 feet east of Maple Street Evergreen Avenue South Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Wille Street Northwest Highway North Btw. Louis Street and Owen Street Northwest Highway North Btw. Fairview Avenue and a point 110 feet east of Prospect Manor Avenue Pine Street East and West The first 200 feet south of Prospect Avenue Prospect Avenue North Btw. Emerson Street and a point 100 feet east of Illinois Rte. 83 Prospect Avenue North Btw. a point 110 feet east of Emerson Street and a point 60 feet west of Maple Street Prospect Avenue South Btw. Emerson Street and a point 180 feet west of Maple Street Prospect Avenue South Btw. a point 110 feet east of Illinois Rte. 83 and a point 110 feet west of Emerson Street Ridge Avenue East and West Btw. Central Road and Walnut Street William Street West Btw. Lincoln Street and Prospect Avenue.” SECTION TWENTY-FOUR : That Section 18.2011A, “SCHEDULE XI - TWO HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Busse Avenue North Btw. Main and Emerson Sts., excluding the westernmost 120 feet thereof Change to Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Emerson Street, excluding the westernmost 120 feet thereof Busse Avenue North and south Btw. Main and Wille Sts. Change to Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Wille Street Hatlen Avenue North and south Btw. Central Road and Grindel Drive Change to East and West Lofts–Emerson– Bounded by East Busse Avenue, East Northwest Nakanishi block parking lot Highway, South Main Street (Elmhurst Road) and South Emerson Street Change to Bounded by Busse Avenue, Northwest Highway, Illinois Rte. 83 and Emerson Street page 12 of 18 Prospect Avenue South Btw. Pine Street and Main Street Change to Btw. Pine Street and Illinois Rte. 83.” SECTION TWENTY-FIVE : That Section 18.2011B, “SCHEDULE XI - TWO HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Elm Street West Btw. Evergreen Avenue and Northwest Highway Emerson Street East Btw. Thayer Street and Busse Avenue Emerson Street East Btw. Berkshire Lane and Council Trail Emerson Street East Btw. Milburn Avenue and Council Trail Emerson Street East Btw. Sha Bonee Trail and Council Trail Evergreen Avenue North Btw. Maple Street and a point 100 feet west of Elm Street Evergreen Avenue North and South Btw. I-Oka Avenue and Hi-Lusi Avenue Evergreen Avenue South Btw. School Street and William Street Henry Street South Btw. 150 feet west of Main Street and Wille Street Henry Street North and South Btw. Main Street and Maple Street Henry Street North and South Btw. Maple Street and Elm Street Hi Lusi Avenue East and West Btw. Busse Avenue and Prospect Avenue except the northernmost 75 feet south of Prospect Avenue I Oka Avenue East Btw. Lincoln Street and Milburn Avenue Maple Street West Btw. Northwest Highway and Henry Street except the first 100 feet south of Central Road (designated as no parking any time) Maple Street East and West Btw. Henry Street and Thayer Street Milburn Avenue North and South Btw. Emerson Street and Main Street Milburn Avenue South Btw. I Oka Avenue and Main Street Owen Street East and West Btw. Central Road and Northwest Highway Pine Street East and West Btw. Lincoln Street and Prospect Avenue Pine Street East Btw. Lincoln Street and Milburn Avenue Prospect Avenue North and South Btw. Elmhurst Avenue and Pine Street Prospect Avenue South Btw. Elmhurst Avenue and Hi Lusi Avenue Prospect Avenue South Btw. Emerson Street and School Street except the first 131 feet west of Maple Street Prospect Avenue South Btw. School Street and Edward Street Ridge Avenue East Btw. a point 170 feet north of Central Road and Henry Street Ridge Avenue West Btw. Walnut Street and Henry Street School Street West Btw. Evergreen Avenue and Northwest Highway page 13 of 18 School Street East and West Btw. Busse Avenue and Evergreen Avenue Name of Street Side of Street Description Sha Bonee Trail North Btw. Maple Street and Emerson Street.” SECTION TWENTY-SIX : That Section 18.2011B, “SCHEDULE XI - TWO HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : inserting the following “Name of Street Side of Street Description Elm Street East and West Btw. Central Road and Henry Street Emerson Street East Btw. Central Road and Thayer Street Emerson Street East Btw. Berkshire Lane and a point 200 feet north of Milburn Avenue Evergreen Avenue North Btw. Hi-Lusi Avenue and Wille Street Evergreen Avenue South Btw. Hi-Lusi Avenue and a point 150 feet east of Pine Street Henry Street North Btw. Emerson Street and Elm Street Henry Street South Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Elm Street Hi Lusi Avenue East Btw. Busse Avenue and Prospect Avenue Hi Lusi Avenue West Btw. Busse Avenue and a point 75 feet south of Prospect Avenue I Oka Avenue East Btw. Lincoln Street and a point 180 feet south of Milburn Avenue I Oka Avenue East The first 180 feet south of Milburn Avenue (8:30AM – 6:00PM) Maple Street West Btw. Northwest Highway and a point 100 feet south of Central Road Maple Street East and West Btw. Central Road and Thayer Street Milburn Avenue North Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Emerson Street Milburn Avenue South Btw. Elmhurst Avenue and Illinois Rte. 83 Milburn Avenue South Btw. I Oka Avenue and Elmhurst Avenue (8:30AM – 6:00PM) Owen Street East Btw. Northwest Highway and a point 110 feet south of Central Road Owen Street West Btw. Northwest Highway and Central Road Pine Street East and West Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and a point 200 feet south of Prospect Avenue Prospect Avenue South Btw. Hi Lusi Avenue and Pine Street Prospect Avenue South Btw. Maple Street and Edward Street Ridge Avenue East and West Btw. Walnut Street and Henry Street School Street East and West Btw. Busse Avenue and Northwest Highway Sha Bonee Trail North Btw. Emerson Street and a point 120 feet west of Maple Street.” page 14 of 18 SECTION TWENTY-SEVEN : That Section 18.2011B, “SCHEDULE XI - TWO HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Name of StreetSide of Street Description Isabella Street South Btw. Emerson Street and Main Street Change to Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Emerson Street Wille Street East and west Btw. 200 feet south of Evergreen Street and Sha Bonee Trail Change Evergreen Street to Evergreen Avenue.” SECTION TWENTY-EIGHT : That Section 18.2012A, “SCHEDULE XII - FOUR HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Emerson Street East Btw. Prospect Avenue and Milburn Avenue Evergreen Street South Btw. Elm Street and Maple Street Evergreen Street North Btw. Elm Street and a point 100 feet west of Elm Street Lincoln Street North Btw. William Street and School Street except the first 81 feet of School Street Prospect Avenue North Btw. Main Street and Central Road Senior Citizens Center parking lot.” SECTION TWENTY-NINE : That Section 18.2012A, “SCHEDULE XII - FOUR HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : inserting the following “Name of Street Side of Street Description Emerson Street East Btw. Prospect Avenue and a point 200 feet north of Milburn Avenue Prospect Avenue North From a point 70 feet west of Illinois Rte. 83 to a point 200 feet east of Central Road Village Hall Parking Structure All stalls except 81 and 84.” SECTION THIRTY : That Section 18.2012A, “SCHEDULE XII - FOUR HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Name of Street Side of Street Description Evergreen Street North Btw. Wille Street and Main Street Change to Evergreen Avenue Change to Btw. Illinois Rte. 83 and Wille Street William Street East and West Btw. Milburn Street and Northwest Highway Change to Btw. Milburn Avenue and Northwest Highway.” SECTION THIRTY-ONE : That Section 18.2012B, “SCHEDULE XII - FOUR HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : inserting the following “Name of Street Side of Street Description Lincoln Street (Ord. 2822) North Btw. William Street and School Street except the first 81 feet east of School Street.” page 15 of 18 SECTION THIRTY-TWO : That Section 18.2012B, “SCHEDULE XII - FOUR HOUR PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : rewording the following “Name of StreetSide of Street Description Municipal lot Bounded by South Main Street (Elmhurst Avenue), West Busse Avenue and West Northwest Highway Change Main Street (Elmhurst Avenue) to Illinois Rte. 83 Thayer Street North Btw. Main Street and Pine Street except a point 65 feet to 85 feet west of Main Street Change Main Street to Illinois Rte. 83 Thayer Street South Btw. Main Street and Pine Street except a point 90 feet west to 180 feet of Main Street Change Main Street to Illinois Rte. 83.” SECTION THIRTY-THREE : That Section 18.2013, “SCHEDULE XII - FIFTEEN MINUTE PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : inserting the following “Location Description Village Hall Parking Structure Stalls 81 and 84.” SECTION THIRTY-FOUR : That Section 18.2014, “SCHEDULE XIV - FIRE LANES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the : following “Location Description 1805 Aspen Drive The west side of Cypress Drive between Eva Lane and Front Drive adjacent to the school. The circular driveway on the west side of the school.” SECTION THIRTY-FIVE : That Section 18.2014, “SCHEDULE XIV - FIRE LANES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the following: “Location Description 1805 Aspen Drive The circular driveway on the west side of the school. 1308 Cypress Drive The west side of Cypress Drive between Eva Lane and Front Drive adjacent to the school. 50 S. Emerson Street The west curb of S. Emerson Street directly adjacent to the main building entrance.” SECTION THIRTY-SIX : That Section 18.2014, “SCHEDULE XIV - FIRE LANES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Location Description 1400 W. Algonquin Road Change to 1743 – 1759 Linneman RoadThe entire twenty foot (20’) perimeter paved drive adjacent to the building including the parking lot drive aisle in front of the building.” SECTION THIRTY-SEVEN : That Section 18.2015A, “SCHEDULE XV - PAY PARKING ZONES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : inserting the following “District or StreetDescription Maple Street Lot The area lying north of Lincoln Street, south of Prospect Avenue and immediately east of Maple Street.” page 16 of 18 SECTION THIRTY-EIGHT : That Section 18.2016A, “SCHEDULE XVI - TRUCK ROUTES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “Street NamePavement Limits db Drive Change to Midway DriveEntire jurisdiction.” SECTION THIRTY-NINE : That Section 18.2016B, “SCHEDULE XVI - TRUCK ROUTES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the : following “Street Name Pavement Limits Agency Dempster StreetAlgonquin Road to Redwood Drive State Dempster Street Redwood Drive to Rte. 83 County.” SECTION FORTY : That Section 18.2016B, “SCHEDULE XVI - TRUCK ROUTES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting the : following “Street Name Pavement Limits Agency Dempster Street Entire Jurisdiction County.” SECTION FORTY-ONE : That Section 18.2017, “SCHEDULE XVII - RESTRICTED INTERSECTION MOVEMENTS,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further : amended by inserting the following “Intersection and Direction Restriction Southeastbound traffic on Northwest No right turn onto westbound Central Road when railroad gates are down Highway at Central Road and when illuminated “No Right Turn” sign is activated Southeastbound traffic on Northwest No right turn onto southbound Emerson Street when railroad gates are Highway at Emerson Street down and when illuminated “No Right Turn” sign is activated Southeastbound traffic on Northwest No right turn onto southbound Mount Prospect Road when railroad gates Highway at Mount Prospect Road are down and when illuminated “No Right Turn” sign is activated.” ECTION FORTY-TWO: S That Section 18.2019, “SCHEDULE XIX - LEASED PARKING ZONES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : deleting the following “District Description East Prospect Avenue Parking space numbers 71 through and including 100.” SECTION FORTY-THREE : That Section 18.2019, “SCHEDULE XIX - LEASED PARKING ZONES,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by rewording the following: “DistrictDescription Wille Street Lot Village parking lot on Wille Street north of Evergreen Street Change to Village parking lot on Wille Street north ofEvergreen Avenue.” SECTION FORTY-FOUR : That Section 18.2021, “SCHEDULE XXI - THIRTY MINUTE PARKING,” of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by : deleting the following page 17 of 18 “Name of Street Side of Street Description Emerson Street West Btw. Busse Avenue and a point 165 feet south of Busse Avenue Village Hall parking lot Adjacent to west side of Village Hall building when so signposted.” SECTION FORTY- FIVE : That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _______ day of ____________, 2011 ________________________________ Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk page 18 of 18 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO:VILLAGE BOARD AND FINANCE COMMISSION FROM:FINANCEDIRECTOR DATE: JUNE 15, 2011 PROPOSED CIP: 2012-2016 SUBJECT: Attached hereto is the proposed 2012-2016Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The projects being considered for the year 2012total $11,765,268. The five-year total for all projects is $64,630,228. We encourage you to read the Manager’s transmittal letter beginning on page ii. This correspondence describes the purpose of the CIP, highlights some of the more significant projects, and reviews project funding. To help you evaluate our ability to fund the requested projects a five-year financial forecast isprovided for the major operating and capital project funds that supportfunding for the CIP. These forecasts can be found in Section H of the document. In general, the projects being presented directly relate to the monies expected to be available. However, from reviewing the CIP requests in conjunction with the five-year financial forecasts I would like to direct your attention to several project areas. General Fund The CIP is showing the five-year average of projects being paid from General Fund revenues as $390,000(A-10). This istypical of the amount of capital projects funded by the General Fund on an annual basis. I would like to point out the five-year financial forecast for the General Fund. This forecast is showing anoperating deficit in 2012of $1.0millionwith annual deficits increasing eachsubsequentyear through 20165($3.4million). Based on this information it is likely that many non-critical projects will be deferred. See the complete five-year forecast for the General Fund beginning on page H-1. Motor Fuel TaxFund (MFT) Receipts from motor fuel taxes beginning in2012are expected to grow by just 1% through 2016. Due to this low level of growth in revenue,the street resurfacing program for 2012 wasscaled back.Spending on street resurfacing for 2012 is $790,000, down from the $1.3 million originally proposed. The programsfor 2009, 2010 and 2011 werealso been scaled back to the level of available funds. The street improvement budget for 2013-2016still reflect full program costs. These project years will also need to be scaled back if revenues cannot support the higher levels. Proposed CIP June 152011 Page 2of 3 Capital Improvement Fund The Capital Improvement Fund is meant to support intermediate sized capital expenditures for various departments that are non-recurring in nature. Some examples of these projects are Detention Pond Improvements, Emergency Generatorsand public building improvements.Supported by a one-quarter cent home rule sales tax, there is approximately $1.0million annually available forthese types of capital projects. Projects included in the five-year plan after 2013will need to be further prioritized with some deferrals to bring the total annual amount down to what can be supported with current revenue streams. Street Improvement Construction Fund Projects The forecast for the Street Improvement Fund (H-11) is showing a positive fund balance of $133,794at the end of 2011, but the fund balance will become a significant deficit by the end of 2013due to stagnant revenues. Revenue to support the program comesfrom the state and local motor fuel tax and one-quarter centhome rule sales tax. Each of these revenue sources isexpected to either show minimal or no growth over the next several yearsresulting in fewer funds available to fund the street program. Adjustments to the amount of work planned each year will be necessary if these revenue sources do not rebound during 2012.The street resurfacing program supported by this fund was reduced from $2.4 million to $1.1 million in order to maintain an adequate level of fund balance. Flood Control Construction Fund Projects Major projects in this fund resumedin 2011when funding from the home rule sales tax became available.Previously, the tax was allocated to support debt service from earlier flood control projects. Beginning in 2011, approximately one-half of the tax is freed up to fund various projects. Prospect Meadows storm sewer and ditch improvements ($1,000,000) isscheduled for 2011-2013. In addition, the Hatlen Heights storm sewer project is slotted to begin in 2015 and is expected to cost $1.9 million. It is anticipated that there will be sufficient funds on hand by that time to begin the project. Funding levels anticipated in 2016 do not support the McDonald Creek project and may have to be deferred. See the complete five-year forecast for the Flood Control Construction Fund beginning on page H-12. Water and Sewer Fund There are several large capital projectsincluded in the CIP for 2012-2016.The first is the ongoing Combined Sewer Improvement project started in 2006. The total cost for the project was originally estimated at $15 million and expected to take 10 years to complete. Funding for this project comes from a $5 per month sewer construction fee and basic sewer usage fee. Based on early results, overall pricingis coming in lowerthanoriginally estimated and completion will likely occur before the planned 10 years. Other major projects include ongoing sewer and water main replacements/rehab averaging $776,000 per year and water tank rehabstotaling $1.4 million.The cash and investment balance is projected to decrease starting in 2013so projects will have to be prioritized and deferred to a level where they can be supported by ongoing revenues.New projects introduced that carry a steep price tag such as the Residential AMR System totaling $3.8 million is likely one that will need to get pushed back. C:\Documents and Settings\djarosz\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\W7C5BMPD\2012-2016 CIP - Board Memo June 2011.docx Proposed CIP June 152011 Page 3of 3 Funding to be Determined The CIP is showingthreeprojects where funding has yet to be determined. These projects includethe Ash Removaland Ash Replacement programsexpected to cost $1.8million over a ten-year periodandPortable/Mobile Radio purchases for Police and Fire costing $1.1 million.Work began in 2009 on a program to treat Ash trees in an effort to prevent infestation of 800 existing White, Blue and Manchurian Ash trees. These trees are not part of the program and will not require removal and/or replacement.The radio purchase for Police and Fire are due to changes to the communications system at Northwest Central Dispatch that will require an upgrade of the radios currently being used by the public safety personnel. Meetings to review the CIP are scheduled for June 23(Finance Commission) and July 12 (Village Board). Staff looks forward to discussing the project submittals and their impact to operations. David O. Erb Finance Director Copy:Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager Dave Strahl, Assistant Village Manager Lynn Jarog, Deputy Finance Director Department Directors C:\Documents and Settings\djarosz\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\W7C5BMPD\2012-2016 CIP - Board Memo June 2011.docx