Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 10/16/2001Next Ordinance No. 5214 Next Resolution No. 52-01 ORDER OF BUSINESS REGULAR MEETING (PLEASE NOTE NEW PERMANENT START TIME) Meeting Location: Mount Prospect Senior Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday October 16, 2001 7:00 P.M. I, CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Irvana Wilks Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Michael Zadel III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Zadel IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Wilks V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2001 VI. "~APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT (To be considered under Consent Agenda) VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. PRESENTATION: 2001 Fire Prevention Poster Contest Winners B. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: Fire Department ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY wHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE A T fO0 SOUTM EMERSON STREET; 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064. PROCLAMATION: "Breast Cancer Awareness Month," October 2001 PROCLAMATION: "Halloween," October 31, 2001 Appointments VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IX. CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk are considered routine by the Village Board and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a Board member, or resident from the audience, so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. X. OLD BUSINESS XI. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 28-01, 1002 S. Na-Wa-Ta Avenue, Residence 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1002 SOUTH NA-WA-TA AVENUE This ordinance grants a variation to replace an existing patio and driveway with relief from lot coverage requirements. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. ZBA 29-01,303 S. Douglas Avenue, Residence 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 303 SOUTH DOUGLAS AVENUE This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for the installation of a circular driveway. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. *A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 307 NORTH WESTGATE ROAD This resolution authorizes the creation of two lots of record, by subdividing one existing lot. The Plan Commission has recommended approval by a vote of 4-0. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2002 ACTION PLAN INCLUDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM This resolution outlines funding allocation for the 2002 fiscal year. The Plan Commission has recommended approval by a vote of 4-0. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 (VEHICLE LICENSES OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This ordinance amends the Code by redefining 'motor vehicle', and exempts antique vehicles displaying an Illinois antique license plate from the vehicle licensing requirements. (Exhibit A) (Exhibit B) (Exhibit C) (Exhibit D) (Exhibit E) (Exhibit F) 1`t reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This ordinance authorizes various parking restrictions on streets in the vicinity of Lions Park School. The Safety Commission has recommended approval by a vote of 6-0. 2. Staff update on Prospect High School area parking restrictions. 1 st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5 (BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This ordinance amends the Code by creating a Planning and Zoning Commission; the existing Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals would be eliminated as separate groups, to form one commission. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE NORTHWEST SUBURBAN MUNICIPAL JOINT ACTION WATER AGENCY FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit G) (Exhibit H) (Exhibit I) XlI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT A. Bid results: 1. Judith Ann Drive street reconstruction and water main replacement project B. *Request for Board approval of State of Illinois joint purchasing bid for road salt Request for Board approval of engineering proposal for storm sewer survey and mapping requirements per National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase Il regulations. D. Status Report Xlll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XlV. CLOSED SESSION PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (1) - The appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee to determine its validity. DISPOSE OF LAND 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (6) - The setting of a price for sale or lease of property owned by the public body. XV. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT October 2, 200'1 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL MAYOR PRO TEM PLEDGE CALL TO ORDER Deputy Village Clerk Kimberly Dewis called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m, ROLL CALL Present: Trustee Timothy Comoran Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Dennis Prikkel Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee trvana Wilks Absent: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to elect Trustee Corcoren as Mayor Pro Tem. Upon mllcall: Ayes: Comoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None Motion carried. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Trustee Zadel led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION MINUTES INVOCATION Trustee Wi[ks gave the invocation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held September 18, 2001. Upon rollcalk Ayes: Comoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None Motion carried. BILLS MAYOR'S REPORT: VEHICLE STICKER CONTEST APPROVE BILLS Mayor Pro Tem Corcoran stated that the next item on the agenda, "APPROVE BILLS" was shown with an asterisk, and that all items further noted in that manner would be considered with one vote under as "IX. CONSENT AGENDA." MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Pro Tem Corcoren and Public Information Officer Maura Jandris announced the winners of the 2001 Vehicle Sticker contest. The contest was sponsored by the Village, and School Districts 26, 57 and 59. The runners up were Annette Ivansivic and Katelyn GrummeL The winner was Julie Provena. Her design will be used for the 2002-2003 Village vehicle sticker. POLICE EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PROCLAMATIONS: PEDIATRIC CANCER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FIRE PREVENTION Police Chief Eddingten, assisted by Mayor Pro Tem Corcoran, recognized the following employees for their many years of service to the Village: EMPLOYEE YEARS OF SERVICE Justin Beach 5 James Peterson 5 Mark Weger 5 Maureen Nickl 10 Richard Sullivant 15 Robert Rzepecki 15 Catherine Caldwell 15 John Gross 15 Kimberley Nagel 20 Lance Besthoff 20 Anthony Halachoulis 25 Mayor Pro Tem Corcoran read a proclamation for Pediatric Cancer Awareness Month and presented it to Kristy Krupa, a representative of the Bear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation. He also read a proclamation for Domestic Violence Awareness Month. A proclamation was read and presented to Rich Doubek, Fire Public Education Officer, for Fire Prevention Week October 7th -13th. There were no recommendations for appointments to boards or commissions. CONSENT AGENDA BILLS STREETSCAPE ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS V3 INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES FUEL GOB $5,000,000 HARRIS TRUST & SAVINGS COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. CONSENT AGENDA Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Zadel, moved for approval of the following items of business: 1. Bills, dated September 27, 2001 2. Bid results for Streetcape Electrical Improvements contract Request for Board acceptance of proposal from V3 Infrastructure Services for construction and inspection services for the Streetscape Electrical Improvements. Request for Board acceptance of Northwest Municipal Conference (NWMC) competitive bid for diesel and lead-free fuel. Upon roll call: Motion carried. Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None OLD BUSINESS An Ordinance was presented for a second reading to authorize the issuance of $5,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series, 2001. Finance Director, Doug Ellsworth, informed the Board the bonds would be sold to Harris Trust and Savings Bank at a net interest rate of 4.5 percent. This interest rate is lower than projected and is expected to save the village $73,000 over the life of the bonds. 2 ORD 5212 Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Zadel, moved for approval of Ordinance No. 5212: AN ORDINANCE AU~6~i~iI~ ?HE ISSUANCE OF $5,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2001, OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. Upon roll call: Motion carried. Ayes: Corooran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None PW VEHICLE AUCTION ORD 5213 NEW BUSINESS An ordinance was presented for a first reading that would authorize the sale of certain personal property owned by the Village. Public Works Director, Glen Andler, explained that this ordinance was needed to allow the Village to participate in the annual vehicle auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference. The auction is to be held on October 20, 2001 at the Mount Prospect Public Works Facility. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Zadel, moved to waive the first reading of this ordinance. Upon roll call: Motion carried. Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve Ordinance No. 5213: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Comoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT A Public Hearing was called at 7:31 p.m. for the purpose of considering the Police Department's proposed use of a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant award in the amount of $18,410 for the purpose of technology and equipment. Deputy Police Chief Ron Richardson explained that the department has consulted with an advisory board, which was set up in 1998 when the grant was first received, to make recommendations for the use of funds. The advisory board determined that the purchase of five (5) in-car video camera systems for patrol cars would be most beneficial to the department. The Public Hearing was declared closed at 7:35 p.m. MANAGER'S REPORT: CHANGE ORDER BURNS& MCDONNELL VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Jeff Wulbecker, Village Engineer, presented a Change Order for the engineering services of Burns & McDonnell. Burns & McDonnell provided documentation to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) advising them that the n~w floodplain map, that took effect on November 6,_2000, contained errors. Submitting Letters of Map Amendment, LOMA, is the process of correcting the original assessment from FEMA. Through this, the property would be removed from the flood plain and not required to obtain flood insurance. Additional properties need to be assessed with a potential of 48 additional LOMA applications. The cost associated with these changes would be a maximum of $22,200. Funds were not budgeted for this expense, however there are funds in the Flood Control Program to cover this cost. 3 Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Zadel, moved to approve the request to authorize the change order and adjust the budget accordingly. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None Motion carried. FIREFIGHTERS LABOR AGREEMENT Assistant Village Manager, Dave Strahl, discussed the labor agreement between the Village and the Mount Prospect Firefighters Union Local 4119. The agreement has effective dates of May 1, 2000 to December 31, 2003. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the labor agreement between the Village and the Firefighters Union Local 4119. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Zadel Nays: None Motion carried. Village Engineer, Jeff Wulbecker provided an update on traffic signals. The signals in the downtown area were tested on Friday, September 28th but the test failed. Mr. Wulbecker stated that there was only one problem; unfortunately it was with the main control. The control cabinet is unable to handle the power load making the lights flash red. They are currently working with ComEd and IDOT to solve the problems quickly and they hope to have it resolved in the next two weeks. ANY OTHER BUSINESS ANY OTHER BUSINESS Trustee Hoefert asked for an update on the Wedgewood Flood control program, it was suggested at a previous meeting to have the issue of maintance of drainage ditches be recorded on the titles of the properties so that in the future, owners would be aware that they are responsible for that maintance. Village Manager, Michael Janonis, stated that the Village Attorney is working on the situation. Trustee Hoefert, asked about the shopping cart program and what can be done to make it work better. Currently there is a grace period in which the store owners/management can pick up their carts. It was suggested that eliminating the grace period or increasing fines would help with this issue. ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT MayorProTem ComomndeclaredtheOc~ber2,2001 meetinga~ournedat7:50p.m. Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk 4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION 11 -Oct-01 GeneraIFund Special Revenue Funds Refuse Disposal Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 Community Development SIk Grant Fund Debt Service Funds Capital Pro~ects Funds Capital Improvement Fund Series 2001 Project Fund Capital Improvement Const Fund Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund Street Improvement Construction Fund Flood Control Construction Fund Enterprise Funds Water & Sewer Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Internal Service Funds Vehicle Maintenance Fund Vehicle Replacement Fund Computer Replacement Fund Risk Management Fund Trust & Aoenc¥ Funds Police Pension Fund Fire Pension Fund Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Benefit Trust Funds Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Balance 10/01/01 - Per Attached 10101101 10/11/01 List of Bills 7,091,738 882,591 415,423 1,052,208 37,516 2,948 2,298,505 131,074 2,435 5,839 1,985 36,193 16,342 3,769,158 184,433 168,629 3,628,061 100,000 193,538 140 3,548,229 112,469 3,205,289 5,100 3,616 17 17,057 69,300 8,250 2,922,629 287,926 14,627 890,603 4,047 2,034 281,263 31 4,955 5,368,106 390,923 2,751,951 26,067 280,264 29,724,718 17,930 9,289 32,435,980 13,090 901 22,271 8,753 3,529 1,478,893 22,579 21,035 56,408 101,118,435 1,869,799 1,040,651 Other Credits/ Debits (69,200) 69,200 Cash & Invstmt Balance 10/11/01 7,489,706 1,086,776 2,427,144 5,839 21,836 3,784,962 3,624,445 99,983 176,481 40 3,660,698 3,202,139 3,195,928 892,616 276,339 5,368,106 390,923 2,497,754 29,733,359 32,448,169 27,495 1,480,437 56,408 101,947,583 · ERFURT: APBOANDRF? GEEREATED: 1 SRP 00 07:17 RER: TBU~DAY OCTII01 13:26 PAGE ER.~NE~E ID : VII~GE OU ~0~ PR(~PEC~ LIST OF BILLS FRRS~ITED TO TEE BOA!~ OF TIPSTERS F~OM SE~ER 28 2001 ~ ~ 11 2001 ~ ~ ~R ~R ~ I~OIOU D~C~I~ O01 01419 A.E.D.C. ~GIETERTIOE 180.00 06404 ALL ER~RICAN FL~G COMPANY FI~AGS/FOR OPNE HOUSE 101.50 05222 Ai,~RICEN INDUSTRIAL UNIFOER REN~/CLPAN 236.86 01833 ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY CUT K~YS 21.15 01840 ANDERSON PEST CONTROL PREVERTIVE SERVICE 260.00 SERVICE 66.25 326.20 02270 AT&T SERVICE 2.07 SERVICE 9.57 SERVICE 1.91 SERVICE 2.87 SERVICE 19.15 SERVICE 9.57 SERVICE 36.38 SERVICE 9.57 SERVICE 14.36 SERVICE 24.89 SERVICE 7.66 SERVICE 7.66 SERVICE 34.47 SERVICE 194.35 SERVICE 190.52 SERVICE 122.55 688.35 05044 AVIS RENT ACAN SYSTER TACUNITLEASE 609.69 06410 BLANKINSHIP, ED 4SQ PUBLIC NALK 140.00 05339 BOOUD TREE CORP AZ T~ACE EYSTERS 326.84 06388 B~DY, MICHAEL 00477 BORES, PAUL 06408 BUSINESS & LEGAL REPORTS, INC. 01008 BUSRE'S [I_~D~]ERS & GIFTS REI~NEPEESES 116.84 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 188.50 SDBSCRIPTIONS 81.57 FLOWERS 255.50 04807 CAPITAL SUPPLY TONER 412.73 01049 COUGOVE~NT, INC OFFICE EQUIP 120.99 DRSMKFT 162.99 CISCO EQUIPME~ 3944.99 OFFICE EQUIP 980.99 UPGRADE TO W2K VERSION 164.49 RESOURCE KIT 54.49 RE~ORT: ~BOAABRPT GENERATED: 1 SES 00 07:17 R~]N: TRD~SDAY OCTll01 13:26 DAGR 2 ABLEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT ~ROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TOTHE BOARD OF TABSTEES FR~ABI:T~/BER28 2001 TOOCTOABR 11 2001 DE~ VF~D(R NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~MO~NT 5478.94 05375 CENTURY CLEANEES ONIFOABCLEANING 74.25 01058 CENTURY LABS, INC CLEAN PROD t97.09 06371 CHOICE POINT BUSINESS INC. SE~PER BILLING 205.00 01097 CINTAS CORP ONIFORM EXPABSE 60.00 ONTFOABEXPABSE 226.60 286.60 01103 CITIZENS RATER ABSOORCES WATER DISTRIBUTION 99.62 03800 CI~AB, SANDRAM. CLOTHING ~L~ABCE 40.50 01118 CLRDKOF TAB CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL ~OR - 100401 700.00 PAYROLL ~OR a 100401 300.00 1000.00 01147 CO}9~(kN~./~TE EDISON ACCT%2443055005 10040.t7 06345 CONSE~ F/S POLY ~ 102.48 01183 COOK COONTY ABCORDER OF DEEDS RECORDING 525.00 06268 CORCORAN, SARAH REI~UESE EXPENSES 26.13 05503 CRYSTAL MABT.&MAINTLXANCE CLEAXABRVICES 7290.00 06411 DACRA ACCESS DATABASE 6875.00 01223 DAILY OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 139.50 06395 DAVtSON, J~S ABBATE 70.00 04753 DES P~INES MINISTE~IA~ ASSOC. PRAYER BREAKFAST 30.00 06396 DISANTO, LUIGI ABBATE 469.00 06343 EDDINGTON, RICHARD CONFEABNCE 206.39 01332 ELGIN FIABDEPARTMABT REGISTER-CHRISTENSEN 150.00 ~HAR, CHEISTIABSON 300.00 450.00 01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS PAB-ABPLOYMENT EVALUATIONS 1080.00 00323 ETEABO, MICEA~L ABIMD EXPENSES 49.50 01369 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE TOWING STICKERS 165.00 00320 FAVIA, JOSEPH ABIM~IIES~ 25.80 . REPORT: APBOARDRI~I GENEEAYED: 1 SEE 00 07:17 RUN: YREREDAY 0<1~1101 13:26 PAGE 3 RELEASE ID : VIALAGE OF 140UN~ PROH~E~ LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF ~RUS~RES }'RCM SE~NR 28 2001 TO OCTOBER 11 2001 REST VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~H~ INVOICE RESCRIi~IlON AMO4]N~ 01377 FEDEREL EXPRESS COEM FED EX PICK UP 12.00 SERVICE 21.79 AIREI]~L 71.06 AIREILL 14.04 AIRBILL 17.56 136.45 00329 FELL, 8UDITN B. RE1T{BUEDH24EN~ 29.42 01396 FIRE FINDINGS LAHS, ~ SUBSCRIFltON RENENA~ 40.00 00102 FIRE PENSION FUND ?AYROLL FOR - 100401 13089.09 01410 EDOREY, MARGARET Y. REIMAURSE)~2F1 85.00 01445 FOd'ITSU BUSINESS CC{9{. SYSTE~4S INSTALL PHONE LINE 170.00 01461 GALL'S, INC. MAG CHARGER 108.98 CHARGER 161.74 270.72 01469 GATEWAY CCMPANIES INC. CD-ROM DRIVE 104.00 COMPSTER EQUIP 1109.00 1213.00 06409 GAEROM, FIOTR 4 SQ OF PUBLIC WALK 140.00 00340 ~Z, ANDY REIMBuRSH2~qT 85.00 06384 GR~L, RETE]~YN PRIZE FOR RUNHER-NP 25.00 01558 HAMS~ ASSOCIATES SREVICE AGRE~NT 435.66 SERVICE AGRES'~2~T 208.74 SERVICE AGRES~iEN'I 100.00 794.40 06401 EEDSTROM CORPORATION REFOND 14.00 06390 HELP RELIEF FUND DOMATION 300.00 01578 HENDRICKREN, ROBERT W. TREE TRICING 19592.00 01609 EDLY FAMILY MEDICAL C~TER pRE-5~PLOYMEN~ PHYSICALS ~ 35.00 ' PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 242.00 277.00 01619 HOUSTON ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 350.~ _. 01642 IACP REGISTER-CONDON,LEB 720.00 00106 IC14A RNTIREMENT TEMST - 40I PAYROLL FOR - 100401 100.00 ICMA-401 PLAN ' 318.75 I~ORT: IPBOER~PT G~ERETED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: T~UESDAY OCTll01 13:26 PAGE 4 RELEASS ID : VILLAGE OF HUN~ PR0~PECT LIST OF BILI~ PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FEUN SEPTEMBER 28 2001 TO Ot~OEER 11 2001 DSPT ~NOCR RER ~OCE NA~ INVOICE UNSCRIPTIUN 418.75 00107 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 PAYROLL FOR ' 100401 15260.00 06405 IDEA ART, INC. POSTCARDS/ENVELOPE 41.45 01635 IEHA FOOD SAFETY CONF. 80.00 01669 ILLINOIS CITY/COUNTY MUNT ASSOC. MEXBEESNIP 100.00 00108 ILLINOIS DEPERTMF~ OF REVUNUE PAYROLL FOR - 100401 16792.18 01680 ILLINOIS FIRE & POLICE CO~{. ANSOC UNGISTER-M.COTTEN 260.00 REGISTER C.BJONK 260.00 REGISTERTION 250.00 770.00 01694 ILLINOIS LAW ENFORC~)fENT SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 24.00 01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. PAPER t502.60 01121 ILLINOIS STATE DISESESE~ENT UNIT PAYROLL FOR ' 100401 7.80 PAYKOLL FOR ' 100401 357.69 PAYROLL FOR - 100401 195.50 PAYROLL FOR - 100401 126.00 PAYROLL FOR - 100401 60.00 PAFEOLL FOR - 100401 520.75 1267.74 01714 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE A~D~XY REGISTRATION 1500.18 REGISTERTION 1500. t8 REGISTRATION 750.09 3750.45 04993 ILLINOIS STATE TOLL NWY A~THORITY T~VEL ESPEESE 0.90 01828 IRON AGE CORPORATION SALTY SHOES 372.95 06382 IVANISEVIC, ANNETTE PRIZE FOR RUNNER-UP 25.00 00353 JANONIS, MICHAEL E. LUNCH/MEETING 68.08 06385 JESSEN, DON 11 SQ PUBLIC WAlK 385.00 01794 KALE UNIFOP~S, INC. ChUrNING SUPPLIES 142.95 ACCT#2300002 149.95 292.90 06399 KASTNER, CLAUDINE ~KATE 455.00 01827 ~EIN, THORPE AND ~ENKINS,LTD. SERVICE-JUL-AUG 32680.95 5IST OF BIL~S PREREI~TED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRON SEPTEMBEW 28 2001 TO ~OB~ I1 2001 DE~ ~R NBR ~ N~ I~OICE D~CRI~I~ 04590 RUTZMER, ROBERT P. INV# 0012 320.00 01859 LAMINATIONS PLUS SIGNS I~INATIONS 25.00 05719 LAW ADVISORY GROUP REGISTER T.GRIFFIN 175.00 01893 LEWIS EQUI~RE~T CO. COVER GASRET 67.48 SWEEPSTER BROON 3400.00 S~EEPSTER BR00~ 48.20 3515.68 06403 LINDCO EQUI~MEN~ SA~E~, INC. REPAIR PA~TS 4402.90 MF SHOCK PLATES 265.80 4668.70 01918 LUNDSTRON'S NURSERY TURF MO~ING 3979.68 LANDSCAPE MAINT 1457.29 5436.97 01922 L~NN PEAVEY CON?ANY EVIDENCE TAPE 125.55 01936 EAIL BOXES ETC. USA UPS CHARGES 22.14 01946 ~ANAG~EN~ CONCEPTS SEEVICES 2037.10 06387 EATUStAK, DEBBIE RECEETIFICATION OF PHE 75.00 06391 EAZUR, RYSZA~D REfUnD 100.00 05709 ~,EABE ELECTRIC CO. IEC. ?P~RFIC SIO RE?AIR 211.00 02309 ~BTROEIC ?0YSIO-CON~ROL COR~. SERV 0CT-DEC.200t 1371.74 05021 ~ENA~OS SUPPLIES 7.25 00116 IiETRO REDEEAL CREDIT ONION PETEOLL FOR - 100401 855.00 00117 F~TEOPOLITAN ALLIANCE - ?OLICE PAYEOLA FOR - 100401 570.00 02826 tiICEAEL WAON/E & SONS, INC. RE~AIR SU?PLIES 149.78 05941 MOETLE CONCEPTS EY SCOTTY CON?LETR MONITOR SYSTEW 2125.00. 04016 MONROE SIGE DESIGN [-SHIETS 120.58 02105 EAGEL, KIM~E~EY RFII/BUREE ~PENSES 30.80 00116 RATIONA~ ¢OOIJCIL ON THE AGING ~A~CY MONGA~ #26431 195.00 00123 N~TI~DE REYRO~L FON - 100~01 14916~03 06389 ~R~, J~ ~U~ 12636 02151 RETH~D BU~ CO., INC. BULBS 952288 FE,~AT: AFEOARDRPT GFEEEATED: 1 ONP 00 07:17 RON: THORSDAY O~Tll01 13:20 PAGE 6 RELEASE ID : VIL~AOS OF MCONT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TRE ~%RD OF TRUSTEES FRON SEPTEMBER 20 2001 TO OCTOBER 11 2001 DEPT ONNDOR HER VREDOR NAI~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION A/4OUNT 02155 NEXTEL CC6R4UiqlCATtoNS ACCT%0005337520-0 104.00 ACCT#0005337520-0 640.20 ACCT#0005371729-4 I56.14 ACCT#0005327297-7 t78.12 ACCT#0009266503-3 t60.90 ACCT#0009316567-8 464.72 ACCT#0009418000-7 228.96 ACCT#0009334000-8 79.02 ACCT#0005625715-7 160.38 2173.34 02170 NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TREG REGISTRATION 800.00 02190 NORTHWEST COI'}H]NITY~4S DEPT FOFES 50.00 02196 NORTHWEST ~ICIPAL CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 30.00 ~5002 NORTHWEST POLICE ACADFEY SKEIHAR 125.00 02199 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PRI~ERCARTRI~EX 139.90 WiLL CALENDAR 8.23 HEATER 47.25 OFFICE SUPP 102.00 OFFICE EUPP 57.36 OFFICE EUEP 858.70 OFFICE SUPP 62.16 1275.60 02200 NORTHWEST SUBUREAiqosoNCIL 2 TICKETS 400.00 04274 NVELRA MS~BERSHIP t35.00 05517 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTION 34.40 ACCT#8473926000 333.00 367.40 06400 PAETH, JODIE 02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. IGFOA CONFERENCE 295.30 MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES HISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES ~ISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES RISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EX?FERES MISC ENVKESKE MISC EXPKESES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES 25.00 7.41 20.43 0.00 12.84 54.44 16.23 22.00 25.02 8.10 47.03 59.00 26.69 24.00 12.00 · EN~T: REBOABON~T GENERATED: I REP 00 07:17 R~: THURSDAY OCTll01 13:26 PAGE ,~. PaLBARE ID : 7 MISC EXP~NRE$ 30.00 MISC EXPENSES 104.03 000.22 00124 POLICE PENSION FU~D REYROIA FOR - 100401 17929.96 04921 POPE, ELIZABETH A. PAYRO]~L FOR - 100401 923.08 06398 PBACKO, JOHN REBATE 70.00 06397 PRESTON, SARAH REBATE 140.00 06303 PROVENZA, JBAIE PRIZE FOR NINEBA 100.00 02379 QUILL CORFOBATION SUPPLIES 108.48 SUP?ELES 100.66 209.14 02396 k~YMAEN OFFICE PROD & FURl{ SI&NATURE STAR? 20.90 SIGBAFORE ST~P 15.95 36.80 06412 BAYMOND V.BRADFORD, TRBAS MEMBERSHIP 20.00 02418 RESCUE SYSTL~S INC. WEBBING,GLOVES,PULLEYS 382.00 02429 RIC MAR INDUSTRIES, IRC. SHIPPING CHARGES 9.86 02430 RICHARDS ~DICkL EQUIP}/~R,!T DISPOSABLE BLADES 204.90 06394 ROBINSON, PLUYME~,PINRCEY REAL ESTATE TRARS~R TAX 750.00 00416 ROELS, ROBERT J. FIAM I36.55 05657 RUSE, MICHAEL REIMBURSE EXPEESES 61.74 04673 SAN BERNARDINO C~NTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS PAYROLL FOR - 100401 200.13 02495 SAYERE CCE?UTBA SOURCE TONER CARTRIDGE 471.60 INK CARTRIDGES 170.97 INK CARTRIDGES 59.98 702.55 00428 SCEMITZ, JEFFREY REIMBURSE}{ER1 61.47 00125 SEIU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 100401 591.12 04217 SHARER, TYMOIHY W. ACTHARIAL STUDY 1800.00 00433 SMITH, ROBERT NEYMREREE ELPEJqSRS 42.36 03010 SOUND (2 PRODUCTIONS SOUND SYSTEM 600.00 lIST OF BILLS PRESENTED ~O THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRON SBPI'I~ER 28 2001 TO OCTORER 11 2001 DEFT VF2qDOE EBR VFi{DOR HAI~E INVOICE DRECRtP~ION AMOUNT REPORT: APBOAMDRPT GREE~ATED: I REP 00 07:17 REM: THEMSDAY OCYll01 13:26 PAGE 8 ~E ID : VI~GE OF M~ PR~P~ LIST OF BILLS PRERE~TIED TO THE BOARD OF TR~STEBS FRON SEPT~ER 28 2001 TO OCTOBER 1i 2001 REPT VENDOR iqBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUFF 02087 SONTRERR RANE COUNTY TREG ASSC 02592 SPECIAL T UNLIMITED 02622 STATE OF ILLINOIS 06386 PTEGBR, RALPH 02632 STEELING CODIFIBRS, INC. 02641 STOFFUL SRALS CORPORATION 00441 STRABL, DAVID 00463 SUI~4ERFIELD FARRE 02675 TAPE CONPAMY 02680 TELETRAC, INC. 01291 THYSSEN DOVER ELEVATOR 02722 TRI-STATE ELECTRONIC CORP 06402 TEMRERGER, ~RRY 02756 EMITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 00127 UNITED WAY 02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 00120 VIL~GE OF MOUI~T PROSPECT 04314 VlL~GE OF MOSNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES 02821 VEMBRIESEN, PURTELL&ROPER,S.C. 02820 RAGRER, JOHN R. 02832 NELMANTSTORES, INC. 02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT REGISTER-DOLAM,MILLER 450.00 T-SHIR~S 166.25 MORGAM,ABERNETHY, 240.00 REBATE 105.00 BUILDING CODE BOOELETS 162.00 ~PEL PINS 392.50 RRII4BUESRE2E~T 38.26 REINDEER CONTRACT 325.00 VIDEOTAPE 585.00 SERVICE 1213.95 ELEVATOR MAINT 201.98 CROSS-OVER PATCH CABLES 7.50 BATTERIES 21.36 28.06 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER 774.00 ACCT%06083947 3000.00 PAYROLL FOE - 100401 311.35 STAMP 20.47 RAYEOLL FOR - 100401 16886.53 REFUND 63.00 16949.53 PAYROLL FOR - 100401 138099.95 PAYROLL FOR - 100401 16623.64 PAYROLL FOE - 100401 13502.94 168226.53 FEES 818.57 REIMBURSEMENT 308.20 FI~SUPPLFES 40.81 FILM DEVELOPING 65.35 ACCT#6032202000806654 78.03 184.19 SUPPLI~ 242.37 REPORT: AREOAMDI~T GENREATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 ~: T~ES~¥ OCTllO1 13:26 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~AGE 9 380 O7O 050 030 00461 WII~ER, CAROL REiT~UES~4ENT 3t2.73 05746 {~ISCTF PAYROLL FOR - 100401 396.t2 02893 WOLF CAMREA, INC. FI~ PROCESSING 19.09 FILM PROCESSING 74.63 93.72 05410 WOP, LDCC44WIRELESS, INC. ACCT{52-00036154 32.26 04388 WORST PILLS BEST PILLS SUBSCRI~IONRENEWAL 12.00 05248 XPEDXSTOP, ES DIVISION SUPPLIES 13.58 TOTAL 415422.80 02270 AT&T SERVICE 02448 ROERASIGNS INC. YAMDDECkLS 3.83 2944.38 2948.2I 01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. MAINT CONTRACT TRAFFIC MAINT TOT~ 1875.00 560.00 2435.00 2435.00 06407 BUCHANAN, BRIAN JOHN JAY SNACKS 01050 CERA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP CTR JAN-SEST BILLING 01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AtANILL 00335 FOLEY, APRIL B. MEETING ~NTOR PROGRAM 02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 06381 WOODS RENOVATION CDBG REEAB TOTAL 64.88 6187.50 14.04 237.10 43.64 280.74 17.45 9777.38 16341.99 LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRCMSEPTEMBFA28 2001 TO OCTOBER 11 2001 DER VREDOR NBR VF~DOR NA)~ INVOICE DESCRIt~ION AMOUNT SUPPLIES 65.74 SUPPLIES 27.21 SUPPLIES 106.00 441.32 REFONT: AEDOARDRPF GEIH~ATED: 1 SEP 00 07:I7 ERE: THURSDAY OCTll01 13:26 PAGE 10 RELEASE ID : VIALAGE OF MOSNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILI, S PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRESTEES FROM SE~REBER 28 2001 TO OCTOBER 11 2001 DEP~ VENDOR NBR VENDOR ifJg{E INVOICE DESCRI~IOI{ AMOUNT 810 825 830 550 59O 610 04830 ILL ENVlR PROT. AGENCY FOR ~F 270 LOAN ~3 83165.50 PROSPEC~ MANOR/E. I{AIN 45087.39 LOAN#4 25148.67 SRE GNUN/RILBURN 15227.62 160629.18 TOTAL 168629.18 01051 ADAMS INTERIORS LTD 04952 CIORBAGROUP INC. WIED(NBLINDS ENGINE~IMGRERV TOTAL 120.00 3498.76 3618.76 01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AIRBILL TOTAL 16.90 16.90 01580 HRERICRSEN & COMPANY, INC. 06406 SENTE & RUBEL LTD. OFFICE FUREI?URE ~SABILITY STUDY TOTAL 9718.50 7338.03 17096.53 01184 COOK COUNTY COLLECTOE 03672 NEITZRE, THC~AS 03675 NORTHWEST PROPERTY 05728 NO,DOD BUILRE~ 02521 SDI CONSULTAN1S LTD. PROPERTY TAXES IMPROVF2{ENT ?RG SALES TAX REBATE RENOVATION RAILROAD DEPOT NK TOTAL 189.26 0000.00 17370.27 45631.27 1109.14 69299.94 06001 WINKLRE'S TREE SERVICE TRED REMOVALS TOTAL 8250.00 8250.00 05222 ~EICANINDUSTEIAL 01780 AMERITECH 02270 AT&T 02451 BADGER METER I~C 05375 CENTUNYCREJ~IERS UNIFORE RENT/CREAN AUG 29-REPT 28 SEEVICE METERS UNIFORM CLEANING 236.86 47.50 255.62 1375.00 74.25 REPORT: RDPOAMDRHT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RON: THURSDAY OCTll01 13:26 PAGE 11 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRO~REOT LIST OF BI]~LS PRERENTHD ~O THE BOARD OF TRUSTRES VE~ SW~T~2~ER 28 2001 TO OCTOBER 11 2001 REPT VENDOR RDR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 630 660 01147 C C{{,iCNI'IE~LT H EDISON ACCT{{447§624003 08047 ELGIN SREEPING SERVICES, INC. INLET CLE&WING 01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP COURIER CHARGES 01828 IRON AGE COR~OWATIOW SAFETY SHOES 01427 8OSBTH D. FOREMAN & CO. TILE PROBE/SLEEVES 01918 LUNDSTROW'S NURSERY TURF MOWING 02220 O'LEARYS CONTR. EQUIP. & SUET. PONY SHOVEL 04838 THIRD MILLE~NI~ ASSOU.INC. UTILITY BII,L RERV 02735 U.S. FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP AMCHOW,FLAWRE 02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLING 02767 OW-MADISOW REGISTRATION 02832 WAL~iART STORES, INC. ACOT{~6032202000806654 02861 WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES RDUTAL 32.33 1486.80 68.69 372.95 172.00 247.12 42.84 1660.07 841.80 5000.00 120.00 343.55 2250.00 TOTAL 14627.38 01147 CC~R4ONNEALTH EDISON ACCT%447577000 02754 ONION PACIETCMAILROAD LAND REARE-RE~T TOTAL 138.49 1895.57 2034.06 03991 ALLSTAR AUTO GLASS 02270 AT&T 02319 AUTO COLOR 01058 CEETURY LABS, INC 01276 DIETBUSTERSAUTOWOTIVE 01511 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES 01705 ILLINOIS RECOVERY SYSTEMS 01872 RATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. 01914 LUND INDUUTRIRS, INC. REPL WINDSHIELD SERVICE PRINT/SUPRDIES CLRAN PROD SERVICE TIRES DISPOSAL OIL PART8 & SERVICE RE~T 2001 PARTS & SRRVICE SEPT 2001 PARTS & SERVICE 665.44 9.59 1314.21 83.60 121.50 559.80 55.00' 588.09 39.00 627.09 143.80 REI~IRT: APBOARDRET GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 ROU: THURSDAY OCTll01 13:26 PAGE 12 RELEASE ID : VlLLARE OF MOUNT REOUPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM SE~TREBRE 28 2001 TO OCTOBER 11 2001 DER VEJ4DOR NBR VREDOR NARE INVOICE RESCRI~XOM 690 710 720 01920 LYNCH AUTO GROUP REPAIR PARTS 01990 MCMASTER-CARE NHREL CASTER 02402 REDI-STRtP DUMP BODY 02404 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION MASHRE SERVICE 02684 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY GAS CYLINDER RENTAL 05004 VERIZON WIRELESS PAGING SERVICE TOTAL 15.82 77.32 864.00 366.75 6.20 45.01 4955.13 01049 CDW OORE~NT, INC REPLACEig. J~'T OF EQUIP 01102 CITIBANK, R.A. INSURANCE CLAIi~S 01306 DRUG CARD, INC. CARD CLAIMS 06160 ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR REPAIR TO P, EJ~AL CAR 01737 INTEREOVE~NTAL PER.BEN.COOP INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE 01966 MARTIN BOYER COMPANT, INC WOP,~I~RS COMP X-SEPT 02064 MOTORO~, INC. DISPLAY ASSEMBLY TOTAL 2141.99 9000.00 11648.58 398.56 7586.52 65072.45 1813.60 144~76.58 219149.15 36969.16 956.48 280263.92 04849 IPRPA DUES 06341 JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POUUE LEGAL FEES 04217 SHARSE, TIMOTHY W. ACTUARIAL NTGDY-POLIOU 02565 SKLODOWSKI,PUC~LSNI & REIMER LEGAL RRS TOTAL 650.00 6662.48 900.00 1077.00 9289.48 04217 SEANPE, TIMOTHY W. 04314 VILI,~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL MIRES ACTURERIAL STUDY-FIRE PAYROLL FOR- 100101 TOTAL 900.00 1.13 901.13 770 01405 FIRST CC693OUWEALTN ARP DENTAL PLAN-OCT 3529.03 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 EEP O0 07:17 RUM: TNUMSRAY OOTll01 13:26 PAGE 13 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF EILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUM EEPT~EE 88 2001 TO OCI~ER 1! 2001 DEOT VENDOR NBR VFSIDOR NARE INVOICE DEECRI~TIUM AMOUNT TOTAL : 3529.03 790 00121 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SAVINGS BUMDS-P/R 10/4 150.00 06393 ~ROGER, ANITA OVF~AYMUMT 63.00 02072 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY PPRT 7TH ALLOCATION 667t.83 01719 NCPRES GROUP LIFE PREMIUM FOR OCT 300.00 02689 THIRD DISTEIOTCIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY 2675.00 BUMD MONEY 550.00 BOND MONEY 3401.00 BO~DMUMEY 100.00 BUMDMOREY 1186.00 7912.00 02808 VILI~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DISBURSE~E1QT 0838.00 DIEBURS~XEiqT 100.00 5938.00 TOTAL : 21034.83 GRAND TOTAL : 1040651.27 REPORT: APBOARDRRT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:I7 RUN: THURSDAY OCTll01 13:26 RELRASE ID : VILIAGE OF MOS~ PROsPECT PAGE 14 LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ SEPTENBER 28 200I TO OCTOBER 11 2001 SUI{t~RY BY FUND 001 GENERAL FUND 415422.80 030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 2948.21 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 2435.00 070 CO~fdNITY DEVELPNI{T BLOCK GENT 16341.99 380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 168629.18 510 CAPITAL I/4PROVENENT FUWD 3615.76 525 SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUWD 16.90 530 CAPITAL IMREOV}~4RET CONST FUND 17056.53 550 DO~ITOWN REDEVLPI{qT CONST 69299.94 590 FLOOD CONTROL C~ST FUND 8250.00 610 WATER AND SEWER FUND 14627.38 630 PARKING SYSTEN REVENUE H~IND 2034.06 660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FEND 4955.I3 690 RISK MANAGENENT FUND 280263.92 710 POLICE PENSION FUND 9289.48 720 FIRE PENSION FUND 901.13 770 FLREC~P ESCROW ~ND 3529.03 790 ESCR~ DEPOSIT FUND 21034.83 TOTAL: 1040651.27 00000 00000 Z VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET REVENUE & EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES January 1 ~ September 30, 2001 10/11/2001 09:20:34 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Revenue Summary 01/01/01 09/30/01 Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Received Received Budget 9 Months ( 3 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unreceived Unreceived Balance Percent REVENL~E BY CLASSIFICATION PROPERTY TAXES OTHER TAXES LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES INTERGOVERMENT REV. CHARGES FOR SERVICE FINES AND FORFEITS INVESTMENT INCOME REIMBURSEMENTS OTHER REVENUE OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Total Ail Funds REVENUE BY FUND GENERAL FUND REFUSE DISPOSAL FU~D MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMUNITY DEVELP~T BLOCK GRNT PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I t993B G. 0. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE DOWNTOW~ REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A DO~TO~ REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B DOWNTOW~ REDEVLOPM~T B&I 1996B DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B DOg~NTOW~ REDEVL B & I 1999 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I t993B FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A FLOOD CONTROL - I998A B & I DOWNTOWN REDEVEI~DP 1998C B & I EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND WATER AND SEWER FUND PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 0 4,486,927 10,101,008 5,614,076 55.6 1,347,565 12,890,979 17,858,846 4,967,867 27.8 80,893 2,613,530 2,951,900 338,370 11.5 453,046 5,561,059 9,496,303 - 3,935,244 41.4 1,055,374 9,478,953 12,879,731 3,400,778 26.4 35,254 331,278 440,000 108,722 24.7 -2,186,681 757,097 8,352,287 4,895,190 88.9 21,820 327,201 998,991 671,790 67.2 138,387 2,074,201 3,181,223 1,107,022 34.8 160,493 1,252,358 12,675,325 11,422,967 90.1 1,103,151 39,773,583 75,935,609 36,162,026 47.6 1,505,578 19,633,389 28,183,971 8,550,582 30.3 24,990 1,797,039 3,366,840 1,569,801 46.6 143,024 1,242,555 1,641,150 398,595 24.3 21 12,964 0 -12,964 10,794 67,583 499,376 431,793 86.5 175 52,124 118,062 65,938 55.9 1,952 257,735 565,866 308,131 54.5 0 0 0 0 1,924 180,485 391,635 2t1,150 53.9 0 0 0 0 341 65,052 144,482 79,430 55.0 78 23,996 53,962 29,966 55.5 1,150 320,176 316,164 -4,012 -1.3 0 0 0 0 23,475 215,620 285,899 70,279 24.6 13,929 128,116 189,772 41,656 24.5 17,384 159,644 211,452 51,808 24.5 5,658 52,059 69,609 17,550 25.2 280 70,087 155,618 85,531 55.0 57,542 530,915 703%761 172,846 24.6 843 8,983 9,868 885 9.0 44,475 408,389 538,778 130,389 24.2 8,980 83,048 111,008 27,960 25.2 32,859 302,023 404,647 102,624 28.4 171,684 939,053 2,017,767 1,078,714 83.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,052,000 10,052,000 100.0 513 6,819 4,600 -2,219 -48.2 107 517,802 ~,029,779 1,511,977 74.5 197,097 1,933,486 2,373,933 440,447 18.6 0 0 0 0 16,849 169,959 1,112,200 942,241 84.7 573,779 5,240,436 7,862,770 2,622,334 33.4 16,157 289,582 347,400 57,818 16.6 95,773 863,394 1,149,301 285,907 24.9 86,612 843,135 1,127,840 284,705 25.2 10/11/2001 09:20:35 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Revenue Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Received Received Budget 9 Months ( 3 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remainin9 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND RISK MANAGEMENT FUND POLICE PENSION FUND FIRE PENSION FUND BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND SEA #1 PROSPECT M~ADOWS B&I SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I Total All Funds 11,319 103,205 134,053 312,872 2,798,964 3,785,640 -1,319,233 -57,608 2,929,601 -956,134 485,973 3,022,180 183 2,421 5,000 0 4,034 0 0 0 0 146 20,946 39,625 1,103,151 39,773,583 75,935,609 30,848 23.0 986,676 26.1 2,987,209 102.0 2,536,207 83.9 2,579 51.6 -4,034 0 18,679 47.1 36,162,026 47.6 10/11/2001 09:19:16 FRRBRR03 SUM 02i Budget 9 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months ( 25.0% ) Remaining Revenue by Category within Fund Sununary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent GENERAL FUND 40 PROPERTY TAXES 41 OTHER TAXES 42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 44 C~LARGES FOR SERVICE 45 FINES A~D FORFEITS 46 INVESTMENT,INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 48 OTHER REVENUE REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 40 PROPERTY TA/fES 44 CF=ARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL REEUSE DISPOSAL FUND MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS TOTAL MOTOR FUEL T~ LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 43 INTEHGOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME CO~94IINITY DEVELP~T HLOCK GP/~T 43 INTERGOVERMEb~T REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL CON~ITY DEVELP~9~T HLOCK PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 40 PROPERTY TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A REFUND 87E & 91A B&I t993B 40 PROPERTY T~ES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 3,116,549 7,011,234 3,894,685 55.5 965,969 8,408,369 11,~48,4ql" 2,640,102 23.9 74,390 2,391,297 2,718,500 327,203 12.0 306,594 4,006,054 5,313,927 1,307,873 24.6 52,406 552,026 695,449 143,423 20.6 35,254 331,278 440,000 108,722 24.7 43,168 414,044 450,000 35,956 8.0 21,728 244,723 330,800 86,077 26.0 6,069 169,049 175,590 6,541 3.7 1,505,578 19,633,389 28,183,971 8,580,582 30.3 0 1,079,489 2,431,590 1,352,101 55.6 20,903 651,789 875,250 223,461 25.5 4,087 65,432 60,000 -5,432 -9.1 0 329 0 -329 24,990 1,797,039 3,366,840 1,569,801 46.6 135,675 t,151,484 1,591,000 439,515 27.6 7,349 87,162 50,000 -37,162 -74.3 0 3,309 150 -3,758 ****.* 143,024 1,242,555 1,641,150 398,595 24.3 0 12,744 0 -12,744 21 220 0 -220 21 12,964 0 -12,964 10,777 10,777 429,276 418,499 97.5 17 288 100 -188 -188.0 0 56,518 70,000 13,482 19.3 10,794 67,583 499,376 431,793 86.5 0 50,720 115,016 64,296 55.9 175 1,404 3,046 1,642 53.9 175 52,124 118,062 65,938 55.9 0 240,169 543,163 302,994 55.8 1,952 17,566 22,703 5,137 22.6 0 0 0 0 09:19:16 FRRBRR03 S~O21 9 Months ( 75.0% ) completed VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months ( 25.0% ) Remainin9 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent TOTAL REFUND 87E & 9lA B&I 1993B G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE' DOWNTOW~ REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDNVLOPMNT B&I 1994B DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 41 OTHER T~XES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTMER FINANCING SOURCES FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 41 OTEER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A REFWNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,952 257,735 565,866 308,131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163,176 370,000 206,824 1,924 17,309 21,635 4,326 0 0 0 0 1,924 180,485 391,635 211,150 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 61,729 140,000 78,271 341 3,323 4,482 1,159 0 0 0 0 341 65,052 144,482 79,430 0 23,376 53,000 29,624 73 620 962 242 73 23,996 53,962 29,966 0 0 0 0 1,190 20,176 16,164 -4,012 0 300,000 300,000 0 1,150 320,176 316,164 -4,012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,579 208,707 276,000 67,293 896 6,913 9,899 2,986 0 0 0 0 54.5 55.9 20.0 53.9 55.9 25.9 55.0 55.9 35.6 55.5 -24.8 -1.3 24 .4 30.2 10/11/2001 9 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed 3 Months ( 25.0% ) Remaining 09:~:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FRRBRR03 su~021 Budget Revenue by CategOry within Fund Sunlmary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL E&I 1994A FLOOD CONTROL H&I 1996A 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL - 1996A B & I DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I PLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT E&I 1994A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 23,475 215,620 285,899 70,279 24.6 13,498 124,771 165,000 40,229 24.4 431 3,345 4,772 1,427 29.9 13,929 128,116 169,772 41,656 24.5 16,836 155,623 205,800 50,177 24.4 528 4,021 5,652 1,631 28.9 17,364 159,644 211,452 51,808 24.5 5,563 51,421 68,000 16,579 24.4 95 638 1,609 971 60.3 0 0 0 0 5,658 52,059 69,609 17,550 25.2 0 67,160 182,300 85,140 55.9 280 2,927 3,318 391 11.8 280 70,087 155,618 85,531 55.0 57,020 527,051 697,000 169,939 24.4 522 3,854 6,761 2,907 43.0 57,542 530,915 703,761 172,846 24.6 843 8,983 9,868 885 9.0 0 0 0 0 843 8,983 9,868 885 9.0 42,213 390,192 516,000 125,808 24.4 2,262 18,197 22,778 4,581 20.1 44,475 408,389 538,778 130,389 24.2 8,730 80,698 106,717 26,019 24.4 250 2,350 4,291 1,941 45.2 8,980 83,048 111,008 27,960 25.2 10/11/2001 09:19:16 FRRBRR03 SUN o21 Budget 9 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed 3 Months ( 25.0% ) Remaining VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Revenue by Category within Fund Su~nary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL STREET IMPROV H & I 1998A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 48 OTHER REVENUE 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRO!rEMENT FUND POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 48 OTHER REVENUE 49 OTNER FINANCING SOURCES STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 41 OTHER TAXES 42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 32,232 297,937 394,000 96,063 24.4 627 4,086 .t0,6~7" 6,561 61.5 32,859 302,023 404,647 102,624 25.4 0 250,000 1,027,100 777,100 75.7 11,191 128,825 100,000 -28,825 ~28.8 0 0 208,197 208,197 100.0 0 78,750 40,500 -38,250 -94.4 160,493 481,478 641,970 160,492 25.0 171,684 939,053 2,017,767 1,078,714 53.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,000 52,000 100.0 0 0 10,000,000 10,000,000 100.0 0 0 10,052,000 10,052,000 100.0 0 0 0 0 513 6,819 4,600 -2,219 -48.2 512 6,819 4,600 -2,219 -48.2 0 0 0 0 107 1,023 6,000 4,977 83.0 0 68,424 350,424 282,000 80.5 0 0 0 0 0 448,355 1,673,355 1,225,000 73.2 107 517,802 2,029,779 1,511,977 74.5 177,397 1,561,224 2,015,933 , 454,709 22.6 6,203 219,533 228,000 8,467 3.7 13,497 152,729 130,000 -22,729 -17.5 197,097 1,933,486 2,373,933 440,447 18.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/11/2001 09:19:17 FRRBRR03 SUM 021 Budset 9 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months ( 25.0% ) Remaining Revenue by Category within Fund Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent FLOOD CONTROL CONST FLrND 41 OTHER TAXES 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FIN~/~CING SOURCES TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND WATER AND SEWER FUND 41 OTHER TAXES 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL WATER AND SEWER FUND PARRING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL PAP~KING SYSTEM REVENLrE FUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUArD VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 43 INTERGOVEP~MENT REV. 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 48 OTHER REVENUE 5,497 50,816 67,200 16,384 24.4 11,352 119,143 45,000 - -74,143 -164.8 0 0 0 0 16,849 169,959 1,112,200 942,241 84.7 0 698,946 1,545,300 846,354 54.8 559,411 4,392,412 6,092,090 1,699,638 27.9 i4,368 132,662 151,000 18,338 12.1 0 0 49,420 49,420 100.0 0 16,416 25,000 8,584 34.3 573,779 5,240,436 7,862,770 2,622,334 33.4 300 2,700 9,400 2,700 50.0 0 130,000 130,000 0 12,992 128,023 176,000 47,977 27.3 2,865 28,859 36,000 7,141 19.8 16,157 289,582 347,400 57,818 16.8 95,106 855,977 1,141,301 285,324 25.0 667 7,417 8,000 583 7.3 95,773 863,394 1,149,301 285,907 24.9 66,154 595,380 787,840 192,460 24.4 20,458 225,230 286,000 54,770 19.6 0 22,525 60,000 37,475 62.5 86,612 843,135 1,127,840 284,705 25.2 9,962 89,502 119,553 30,051 25.1 1,357 13,703 14,500 797 5.5 11,319 103,205 134,053 30,848 23.0 0 0 5,000 5,000 100.0 238,440 2,213,844 2,992,288 778,444 26.0 10,534 110,407 150,000 39,593 26.4 92 10,149 60,000 49,855 83.1 63,806 464,568 578,352 113,784 19.7 10/11/2001 09:I9:17 FRRBRR03 SUM 021 9 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed 3 Months ( 25.0% ) Remaining VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Sununary 01/01/01 09/30/01 cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Received Received Budget Unreceived Unreceived Balance Percent POLICE PENSION FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND FIRE PENSION FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTREH REVENUE TOTAL FIRE PENSION FUND BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND, SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 41 OTHER TAXES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 41 OTHER TA/fES 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 312,872 2,798,964 3,785,640 906,676' 26.1 -1,356,765 -737,533 1,760,000 2,497,533 141.9 37,532 679,925 1,169~601 ~89~676 41.9 -1,319,233 -57,608 2,929,601 2,98%,209 102.0 -984,114 -122,673 1,900,000 2,022,673 106.5 27,980 608,646 li122,180 513,534 45.8 -956,134 485,973 3,022,180 2,536,207 83.9 183 2,421 5,000 2,579 51.6 183 2,421 5,000 2,5?9 51.6 0 4,034 0 -4,034 0 4,034 0 -4,034 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 19,772 38,125 18,352 48.1 115 1,173 {,500 327 21.8 146 20,946 39,625 18,679 47.1 0 0 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0 4,573,000 100.0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01101 - 09/30/01 9 Months ( 3 Months ( Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unex~pended Unexpended Balance Percent EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS PENSION BENEFITS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UTILITIES INStr~ANCE COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES OTHER EXPENDITURES LJ~ND IMPROVEMENTS BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS OFFICE EQUIPMENT MOBILE EQUIPMENT OTHER EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE BOND PRINCIPAL INTEREST EXPENSE BANK AND FISCAL FEES INTERFUND TPJ~NSFERS Total All Funds EXPENDITURE BY FUND GENERAL FUND REFUSE DISPOSAL FUbrD MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRA~T COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GR~T PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMMT B&I 1993A DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 FLOOD CONTROL B&I t891A FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,492,413 13,200,022 18,76E,209 5,565,187 29.7 310,189 3,389,248 5,203,822 1,814,574 34.9 23,347 209,468 358,850 149,382 41.6 304,678 2,600,246 3,656,306 ~ 1,056,060 28.9 1,005,193 8,823,934 14,243,349 5,419,415 38.0 34,564 313,263 572,474 259,211 49.3 305,765 2,924,596 3,780,667 856,071 22.6 79,629 791,012 1,348,015 557,003 41.3 48,422 685,266 1,405,106 719,840 51.2 6,506 64,866 640,428 575,959 89.9 6,250 97,031 1,138,000 1,040,969 91.5 4,111 155,363 434,735 279,372 64.3 6,092 902,190 1,500,245 598,055 39.9 16,236 200,699 621,307 420,608 67.7 0 83,366 625,509 542,143 86.7 675,309 3,027,570 9,966,282 6,938,722 69.6 0 439,658 3,201,880 2,762,222 86.3 0 797,386 1,251,762 454,376 36.3 0 4,200 10,830 6,630 61.2 160,493 481,478 641,970 160,492 25.0 4,479,167 39,190,862 69,366,743 30,178,881 43.5 2,143,707 19,926,653 28,336,698 8,810,045 31.1 265,948 2,388,510 3,329,591 941,081 28.3 8,804 849,136 2,249,363 1,400,227 62.2 568 5,665 14,863 9,198 61.9 7,774 74,992 499,376 424,384 85.0 0 47,000 47,000 0 0 61,271 589,543 528,272 89.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,597 43~,292 407,695 94.7 0 0 0 0 0 6,694 163,388 156,694 95.9 0 2,344 54,588 52,244 95.7 0 510,263 511,163 900 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28,947 309,624 280,677 90.7 0 14,755 179,710 164,955 91.8 0 23,568 212,188 188,620 88.9 0 8,304 66,908 58,604 87.6 0 23,784 152,970 129,186 84.5 0 326,320 603,854 277,534 46.0 0 56,349 112,498 56,149 49.9 0 48,276 621,753 573,477 92.2 0 3,319 156,688 153,369 97.9 0 51,300 102,900 51,600 50.1 19,734 477,543 3,115,593 2,638,050 84.7 10/11/2001 09:21:06 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Budget Expenditure Sununary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 9 Months ( 3 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND WATER AND SEWER FUND PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND VEMICLE MAINTENANCE F~IND VEMICLE REPLACEMENT FUND COMPUTER REPI~ACEMENT FLIND RISK MANAGEMENT FUND POLICE PENSION FUND FIRE PENSION FUND BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I Total All Fu/%ds 0 0 0 15,950 16,051 960,000 0 0 190,666 47,406 717,782 1,923,792 621,280 1,860,372 3,556,917 47,850 68,484 2,191,942 600,692 4,814,500 8,274,725 12,666 110,766 410,895 78,939 753,302 1,155,389 23,592 954,690 1,570,245 0 36,255 46,075 280,872 2,706,256 3,535,903 151,547 1,277,979 1,813,738 148,878 1,284,041 1,798,075 2,960 26,641 35,525 0 0 0 0 6,153 42,305 4,479,167 39,190,862 69,366,743 0 943,949 98.3 190,666 100.0 1,206,010 62.7 1,696,545 47.7 " 2,123,458 96.9 3,460,225 4t.8 300,129 73.0 402,087 34.8 615,555 39.8 9,820 21.3 829,647 23.5 535,759 29.5 514,034 28.6 8,884 28.0 0 36,152 85.5 30,175,881 48.5 FRRDBR01 SUMO31 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Month~ Department Budget Expenditure Sturmlary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 03 ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 80 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Totals EOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND Totals 2,961 73,656 91,870 18,214 19.8 1,232 9,813 15,136.. 5,323 35.2 4,193 83,469 ~07,006 23,537 22.0 2,726 23,828 32,359 8,531 26.4 371 3,275 4,438 1,163 26.2 0 50 400 350 87.5 787 49,873 57,334 7,461 13.0 63 381 42S 44 10.4 246 4,361 9,550 5,189 54.3 0 1,701 2,500 799 32.0 4,193 83,469 107,006 23,537 22.0 4,193 83,469 107,006 23,537 22.0 4,193 83,469 107,006 23,537 22.0 10/11/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM03i 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Mo~tns Department Budget Expenditure Su~nary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 EXpended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE 02 LEGAL SERVICES 03 PERSONNEL SERVICES 04 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 05 PUBLIC INFORMATION Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 90 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Totals Tot&ls 30,889 281,084 372,431 1,524 249,411 262 100 14,149 123,504 288,908 10,680 90,601 172,832 8,879 110,894 161,196 66,121 851,494 1,257,468 91,347 24.5 16,689 8.4 165,399 57.3 82,231 47.6 50,302 31.2 405,968 32~3 43,717 326,977 520,110 9,295 77,907 113,842 143 21,438 41,300 11,923 363,953 489,270 314 2,840 5,220 729 33,675 36,450 0 24,704 51,270 66,121 851,494 1,287,462 193,133 37.1 35,935 31.6 19,862 48.1 125,317 28.6 2,380 45.6 2,775 7.6 26,566 51.8 405,968 32.3 66,121 851,494 1,257,462 66,121 851,494 1,257,462 405,968 32.3 405,968 32.3 10/11/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months ( 3 Months ( VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Depart.merit Budget EXPenditure smm'aary Ol/Ol/Ol 09/30/01 TV SERVICES DIVISION Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 78.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 TELEVISION SERVICES 03 OTHER SERVICES 04 INTERGOVEP~NMENTAL PROGRAMMING Totals EXPENDITUEH CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND Totals 12,231 139,089 191,304 52,215 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27.3 6,036 62,629 90,423 27,794 30.7 1,944 18,474 25,220 6,746 26.7 123 3,197 4,300 1,103 25.7 1,812 13,824 19,461 5,937 30.5 737 3,800 5,800 2,000 34.5 573 8,247 9,600 1,383 14.1 1,006 29,218 36,800 7,282 20.0 12,231 139,089 191,304 52,21S 27.3 12,231 139,089 191,304 52,215 27.3 12,231 189,089 191,304 52,215 27.3 12,231 139,089 191,304 52,215 27.3 10/i1/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM031 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 09/30/01 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Totals EXPENDITURE CI~SSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 92 OTMER EMPLOYEE COSTS 84 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES Totals Totals 13,449 108,268 143,370 41,102 13,449 102,268 149,370 '- 41,102 28.7 28.7 13,449 102,268 143,370 41,102 28.7 13,449 102,268 143,370 41,102 28.7 13,449 102,268 143,370 41,102 2817 7,904 59,736 82,467 22,731 27.6 2,189 18,185 24,884 6,699 86.9 907 1,435 2,300 865 37.6 1,604 16,774 24,919 8,145 32.7 248 1,425 1,600 175 10.9 897 4,713 7,200 2,487 54.5 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Mo~ths Department BUdget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 09/30/01 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 EXpended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 02 ACCOUNTING 03 DATA PROCESSING 04 DUPLICATING SERVICES 05 INSURkNCE PROGRAMS 06 CUSTOMER SERVICES 07 CASH MANAGEMENT Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 56 INSURANCE 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND Totals 20,863 157,018 218,785 21,913 205,565 297 168 12,505 174,734 222,720 1,547 9,115 11,700 19,497 177,085 237,398 20,906 217,948 311,847 2,791 28,368 35,752 61,767 28.2 91,603 30.8 47,988 21.5 2,585 22.1 60,313 25.4 93,899 30.1 9,384 26.2 100,022 967,833 1,335,370 367,537 27.5 60,155 525,903 741,152 15,957 141,360 194,277 485 4,715 9,350 4,036 130,127 163,035 881 4,816 5,150 15,186 136,673 182,231 2,523 16,257 31,100 799 7,982 9,075 100,022 967,833 1,335,370 215,249 29.0 52,917 27.2 4,635 49.6 32,908 20.2 334 6.5 45,558 25.0 14,843 47.7 1,093 12.0 367,537 27.5 100,022 967,833 1,335,370 367,537 27.5 100,022 967,833 1,335,370 367,537 27.5 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM 03i 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Month~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Cur MO Y~T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 02 PLANNING & ZONING 03 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 05 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 06 HOUSING INSPECTIONS 07 HEALTH INSPECTIONS Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIBS & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST Totals 14,654 136,031 186,518 26,057 256,990 378,917 5,511 50,442 '72,244 50,569 452,809 653,510 19,798 184,567 261,101 9,283 73,238 101,881 50,487 27.1 121,927 32.2 21,802 30.2 200,701 30.7 76,584 29.3 28,645 28.1 125,872 1,184,075 1,654,171 500,096 30.2 80,469 708,598 1,027,940 23,308 208,956 291,544 1,298 18,532 21,045 18,421 I89,233 268,987 1,458 I7,732 25,310 918 10,822 15,745 0 3,402 3,800 125,872 1,154,075 1,654~171 319,342 31.1 82,588 28.3 8,513 26.2 79,754 29.6 7,578 29.9 5,123 32.5 198 5.5 500,098 30.2 125,872 1,153,645 1,653,121 499,476 30.2 0 430 1,050 620 58.0 125,872 1,154,075 1,654,171 5001096 30~2 10/11/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM 83I 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget EXpenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remainin9 Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 04 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 05 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 06 ACCESSIBLTY & NEIGHBRHD IMPRV 07 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHAB Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OT~ER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 69 INFRASTRUCTURE Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 070 CO~gE~ITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GP~NT Totals 813 9,138 20,976 11,840 56.4 827 30,745 53,400 22,655 42.4 0 0 285,000 285,000 100.0 6,134 35,111 140,000 104,889 74.9 7,774 74,992 499,376 424,384 85.0 ~19 5,697 13,340 7,843 57.3 198 1,793 2,906 1,113 38.3 0 341 1,040 699 67.2 827 31,570 55,740 24,170 43.4 0 480 1,350 870 64.4 6,134 35,111 140,000 104,889 74.9 0 0 85,000 85,000 100.0 0 0 200,000 200,000 100.0 7,774 74,992 499,376 424,384 85.0 7,774 74,992 499,376 424,884 85.0 7,774 74,992 499,376 424,384 85.0 10/11/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 HUMAN SERVICES 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 09/30/01 Cur MO Y-T~D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 02 SOCIAL SERVICES 03 NURSING/HEALTH SERVICES 04 SENIOR CTR. LEISURE ACTIVITIES Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT Totals Totals 14,297 96,774 168,643 22,054 226,193 326,845 6,825 60,489 '95,361 4,538 84,400 81,961 47,714 437,856 672,810 71,869 42.6 100,652 30.8 34,872 36.6 27,561 33.6 234,954 34.9 35,471 308,263 426,425 118,162 25~37 8,640 75,778 103,698 27,920 26.9 266 1,239 5,300 4,061 76.6 1,936 38,708 90,942 52,234 57.4 752 5,968 7,280 1,312 18.0 649 6,771 33,969 27,194 80.1 0 1,129 2,000 871 43.6 0 0 3,200 3,200 100.0 47,714 437,856 672,810 234,954 34.9 47,714 437,856 672,810 234,954 34.9 47,714 437,856 672,810 234,954 34.9 10/11/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 POLICE 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent 01 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 02 PATROL & TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 03 CRIME PREVTN & PUBLIC SERVICES 04 INVESTIGATIVE & JUVENILE PRGM 05 CROSSING GUARDS 06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 59 UTILITIES 97 CO~ODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT Totals 147,964 1,313,767 1,899,839 586,078 30.8 443,592 4,109,430 5 663 403 1,553,973 27.4 17,854 142,358 213,129 70,771 33.2 81,910 691,843 1,020,092 328,249 32.8 1,134 13,396 23,978 10,582 44.1 44,103 450,613 626,364 175,751 28.1 736,557 6,721,407 9,446,805 2,725,398 28.8 542,501 4,625,691 6,252,065 1,626,374 26.0 87,221 1,066,308 1,714,133 647,825 37.8 6,327 39,578 83,065 43,487 52.4 87,558 875,200 1,203,989 328,789 27.3 7,190 35,943 57,124 21,181 37.1 4,738 52,929 86,891 33,962 39.1 0 18,257 31,313 13,056 41.7 1,022 7,501 18,285 10,724 58.8 736,557 6,721,407 9,446,805 2,725,398 28.8 736,557 6,716,310 9,431,942 2,715,632 28.8 0 5,097 14,863 9,766 65.7 736,557 6,721,407 9,446,805 2,725,398 28.8 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 FIRE 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent 01 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 02 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 03 FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY 04 FIRE PREVENTION 05 FIRE CO~UNICATIONS 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 5t EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 CO~ODITIES & SUPPLIES 64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND Totals 56,851 922,555 1,592,036 669,481 42.1 382,059 3,502,634 5,058,954 1,556,320 30.8 0 1,268 ':15,135- - 13,867 91.6 33,663 286,500 412,858 128,356 30.6 8,448 48,803 53,940 5,137 9.5 37,948 292,717 405,090 112,373 27.7 1~419 8,803 15,620 8,817 56.4 2,281 23,269 32,490 9,221 28.4 522,669 5,084,549 7,586,121 2,50~,572 33.0 386,662 3,607,592 5,272,635 1,665,043 31.6 68,199 945,691 1,558,150 612,459 39.3 8,839 78,257 125,560 47,303 37.7 38,648 307,792 417,621 109,825 26.3 7,028 35,804 37,150 1,348 3.6 10,340 62,137 97,430 35,293 36.2 0 5,459 9,000 3,841 39.3 0 5,043 4,200 -843 -20.1 2,953 36,774 64,375 27,601 42.9 522,669 5,084,549 7,586,I21 2,501,572 33.0 522,669 5,084,549 7,586,121 2,501,572 33.0 522,669 5,084,549 7,586,121 2,501,572 33.0 10/11/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM031 PUBLIC WORKS 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Surmnary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 - ADMINISTRATION Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS PUBLIC WORKS ADMINSTRATION Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 67 0TBER EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 00t GENERAL FUND Totals 81,649 699,049 960,512 261,463 27.2 81,649 699,049 960~,512 17,577 131,275 193,808 8,590 73,748 100,381 2,399 19,011 27,850 49,811 448,928 605,538 2,674 14,389 17,175 598 10,201 11,260 0 0 3,000 0 1,500 1,500 81,649 699,049 960,512 261,463 27.2 62,533 32.3 26,636 26.5 8,839 31.7 156,610 25.9 2,786 16.2 1,059 9.4 3,000 100.0 0 261,463 27.2 81,649 699,049 960,512 261,463 27.2 81,649 699,049 960,512 261,463 27.2 FRRDBR01 SUM 081 PUBLIC WORKS 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Suamnary 01/01/01 09/30/01 - STREETS/BLDGS Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Expended E~pended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remainin9 Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent 01 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION 02 MAINTENANCE - PUBLIC BUILDINGS 04 STREET MAINTENANCE 09 SNOW REMOVAL 06 LEAF REMOVAL 07 STORM SEWER & BASIN MAINT 08 MAINTENANCE OF STATE RIGHWAYS 09 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 11 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 56 INSURANCE 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 59 OTRER EXPENDITURES 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 69 INFRASTRUCTURE Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND Totals 13,469 95,989 124,265 57,505 484,929 719,533 19,054 294,440 532,031 6,655 180,146 316,488 12,594 72,180 155,918 I3,125 93,449 138,935 1,536 39,131 59,812 6,477 64,795 98,347 12,666 110,786 280,895 28,278 82.8 234,604 32.6 227,591 43.6 136,322 43.1 82,738 53.7 45,486 32.7 20,681 34.6 33,552 34.1 170,129 60.6 143,081 1,435,825 2,416,204 980,379 40.6 69,812 694,308 1,050,729 18,179 169,513 244,418 31,878 234,494 434,628 1,593 10,293 21,605 627 5,643 7,524 18,679 185,618 308,718 0 0 0 0 7,709 9,909 2,513 128,247 338,673 356,421 33.9 74,905 30.8 200,134 46.0 11,312 52.4 1,881 25.0 123,100 39.9 0 2,200 22.2 210,426 62.1 143,081 1,435,825 2,416,204 980,879 40.6 130,415 1,260,135 1,962,269 702,134 35.8 0 64,924 173,040 108,116 62.5 12,668 110,766 280,895 170,129 60.6 143,081 1,435,825 2,416,204 980,379 40.6 FRRDBR01 SUM031 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Sununary 01/01/01 09/30/01 PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GRNDS Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 7S.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 0i FORESTRY DIVISION ADMIN 02 MAINTENANCE OF GROUND 03 FORESTRY PROGRAM 04 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTMACTUAL SERVICES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Totals 16,070 120,674 171,112 28,920 238,680 327,921 44,179 412,619 730,474 8,314 25,729 48,198 50,438 29.5 92,241 28.1 317,855 43.5 22,469 46.6 94,483 794,702 1,277,705 483,003 37.8 49,599 443,522 609,247 165,725 27.2 11,959 109,210 149,540 40,330 27.0 0 1,471 1,290 -181 -14.0 32,070 224,124 471,238 247,114 82.4 746 16,266 34,500 18,234 52.9 109 109 11,890 11,781 99.1 94,483 794,702 1,277,705 483,003 37.8 94,483 790,651 1,262,705 0 4,081 15,000 472,054 37.4 10,949 73.0 94,483 794,702 1,277,705 483,003 37.8 10/11/2001 09:19:55 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 PUBLIC WORKS 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 - ENGINEERING Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 79.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 ENGINEERING SERVICES 05 TRAFFIC CNTRL & STREET LGMTNG Totals 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 69 INFRASTRUCTURE Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FU~D 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND Totals 48,129 487,399 665,253 177,854 26.7 8,389 202,759 533 214 330,455 62.0 56,518 690,158 1,198,467 508,309 42.4 41,774 349,831 483,669 10,753 91,798 130,112 0 3,801 8,930 2,447 115,030 199,195 0 91,852 248,800 1,544 8,488 15,875 0 728 2,700 0 2,185 2,185 0 26,775 llO,O00 133,838 27.7 38,314 29.4 2,129 38.9 84,166 42.3 157,248 63.2 7,417 46.7 1,972 73.0 0 83,225 75.7 56,518 690,158 1,198,467 508,309 42.4 55,958 627,136 922,197 295,061 32.0 560 63,022 276,270 213,248 77.2 56,518 690,158 1,198,467 508,309 42.4 10/11/2001 09:19:56 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 PUBLIC WORKS 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Mont~s Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 - WATER/SEWER 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 WATER & SEWER DIVISION ADMIN 02 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 03 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 04 WATER SUPPLY MAINT & REPAIR 05 WATER DISTRBT MAINT & REPAIR 06 WATER V~LLVE/HYDP~NT MAINT A REP 07 WATER METER MAINT & REPL 08 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 09 SANITARY SEWER MAINT & REPAIR 10 WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROV 12 LAKE MICHIG~J~ WATER SUPPLY Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 56 INSUP~ANCE 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 68 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 71 BOND PRINCIPAL Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 610 WATER AND SEWER FUND Totals 108,755 811,770 1,407,060 595,290 42.3 1,104 15,033 83,499 68,466 82.0 17,038 53,641 80,652 27,011 33.5 29,908 285,731 868,666 382,935 57.3 39,723 307,379 601,451 294,072 48.9 16,853 177,025 287,001 109,976 38.3 33,344 158,107 273,934 115,827 42.3 44,081 396,731 528,975 132,244 25.0 24,900 262,707 441,037 178,330 40.~ 0 302,547 845,970 543,423 64.2 284,986 2,043,829 3,055,480 1,012,651 33.1 600,692 4,814,500 8,274,725 3,460,225 41.8 103,239 880,360 1,331,253 450,893 33.9 30,473 266,830 377,000 110,170 29.2 1,130 17,570 25,720 8,150 31.7 422,274 3,246,207 5,038,784 1,792,577 35.8 11,333 86,375 137,170 50,795 37.0 8,838 79,539 106,053 26,514 25.0 12,827 114,841 234,034 t19,193 50.9 0 11,082 22,364 11,282 50.4 0 1,391 5,438 4,047 74.4 10,578 26,939 264,300 237,381 89.8 0 83,366 625,509 542,143 86.7 0 0 107,100 107,100 100.0 600,692 4,814,500 8,274,725 3,460,225 41.8 800,692 4,814,500 8,274,725 '3,460,225 41.8 600,692 4,814,500 8,274,725 3,460,225 41.8 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Mo~t~s Department Budget Expenditure Summary ol/o /o - 09/30/0 PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 REFUSE DISPOSAL PROGRAM Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 56 INSURkNCE 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND Totals 265,948 2,388,510 3,329,891 941,081 28.3 265,948 2,388,510 3,3~9,~91.. 941,081 28.3 5,172 49,078 69,280 20,202 29.2 1,498 13,798 19,001 5,203 27.4 -55 248 1,500 1,252 83.5 259,007 2,318,006 3~228,737 910,731 28.2 84 378 500 122 24.4 242 2,179 2,906 727 25.0 0 4,823 7,667 2,844 37.1 265,948 2,388,510 3,329,591 941,081 28.3 265,948 2,388,510 3,329,591 941,081 28.3 265,948 2,388,510 3,329,591 941,081 28.3 FRRDBR01 SUM 081 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 PUBLIC WORKS - VEHICLE MAINT Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 VEHICLE DIVISION ADMINSTRATION 02 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND Totals 14,839 103,032 148,019 64,100 650,270 1,007,370 78,939 753,302 1,~55,389 44,987 30.4 357,100 35.4 402,087 34.8 38,466 357,595 536,539 11,268 102,182 145,290 1,485 1,585 2,900 4,410 51,538 65,160 209 1,290 985 23,101 238,936 380,785 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 0 178 22,750 78,939 753,302 1,155,389 178,944 33.4 43,108 29.7 1,315 45.3 13,624 20.9 -325 -33.7 141,849 37.3 0 22,572 99.2 402,087 34.8 78,939 753,302 1,155,389 402,087 34.8 78,939 753,302 1,155,389 402,087 34.8 10/11/2001 09:19:56 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months ( 75.0% ) Completed VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months ( 25.0%~ ~ema±nlng Department Budget Expenditure Sununary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 COM/41/NITY SERVICE PROGi~AMS Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 COMMUNITY GROUPS & MISC 03 4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS,ETC 04 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 05 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 54 55 57 59 PERSONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES UTILITIES COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES OTHER EXPENDITURES Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND Totals 4,632 65,749 95,400 2,821 97,638 97,511 469 7,249 '67,239 166 1,915 2,871 8,088 172,551 263,021 29,651 31.1 -127 -0.t 59,990 89.2 956 33.3 90,470 34.4 518 39,139 31,768 -7,371 -23.2 117 4,445 4,988 543 10.9 6,632 117,290 189,170 71,880 38.0 0 0 1,200 1,200 100.0 821 11,677 25,895 14,218 54.9 0 0 10,000 10,000 100.0 8,088 172,551 263,021 90,470 34.4 8,088 172,551 263,021 90,470 34.4 8,088 172,551 263,021 90,470 34.4 10/11/2001 09:19:56 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months Department Budget Expenditure Suaunary 01/01/01 09/30/01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 VILLAGE IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIP 02 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 03 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 04 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 06 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 09 MOTOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 10 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 59 OTHER EXPEA~DITURES 62 LASiD IMPROVEMENTS 64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 69 INFRASTRUCTURE Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FIIND 520 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 525 SERIES 2001 PROJECT FUND 530 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE F~ND 670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 680 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Totals 26,080 250,980 2,503,037 2,252,057 90.0 9,763 219,264 1,610,222 1,390,958 86.4 47,406 717,382 1,922,742 1,205,390 62.7 47,850 68,484 2,331,942 2,263,458 97.1 629,933 2,605,480 5,499,970 2,894,490 52.6 6,092 902,190 1,500,245 598,055 39.9 0 36,255 46,075 9,820 21.3 767,124 4,800,005 15,414,233 10,614,228 68.9 29,312 49,867 1,174,100 1,124,233 95.8 0 277 0 -277 42,288 639,073 1,232,742 593,669 48.2 6,506 64,866 640,428 575,559 89.9 6,250 91,572 1,044,000 952,428 91.2 3,312 91,026 318,639 227,613 71.4 6,092 902,190 1,500,245 598,055 39.9 568 88,586 186,473 97,887 52.5 672,796 2,872,548 9,317,609 6,445,061 69.2 767,124 4,800,005 15,414,233 10,614,228 68.9 8,244 721,190 1,800,053 1,078,863 59.9 568 568 0 -568 19,734 477,543 3,115,593 2,638,050 84.7 0 0 0 0 15,950 16,051 960,000 943,949 98.3 0 0 190,666 190,666 100.0 47,406 717,352 1,922,742 1,208,390 62.7 621,280 1,860,372 3,556,917 '1,696,845 47.7 47,850 68,484 2,19f, 942 2,123,458 96.9 0 0 130,000 130,000 100.0 6,092 902,190 1,500,245 598,055 39.9 0 36,255 46,075 9,820 21.3 0 0 0 0 767,124 4,800,005 15,414,233 10,614,228 68.9 10/11/2001 09:19:56 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 DEBT SERVICE 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) EemaininH Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 03 O4 O5 O6 DEBT SERVICE - PROPERTY TAXES DEBT SERVICE - TAX INCREMENT DEBT SERVICE - N/R SALES TAX 1 DEBT SERVICE - H/R SALES TAX 2 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA B & I Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 89 OTHER EXPENDITURES 71 BOND PRINCIPAL 72 INTEREST EXPENSE 73 BANK AND FISCAL FEES 80 INTERFUND TPJ~NSFERS Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 140 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 170 REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B 180 G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 240 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 250 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 260 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 270 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 280 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 290 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 300 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 310 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 820 REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B 330 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 340 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 350 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 360 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 390 FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 410 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 420 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 430 STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 810 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 830 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I Totals 0 108,271 636,543 528,272 83.0 0 565,682 1,312,401 746,719 56.9 0 458,243 1,484,782 ~ 1,026,539 69.1 0 102,895 881,341 778,446 88.3 0 6,I53 42,305 36,182 85.5 0 1,241,244 4,357,372 3,116,128 71.5 0 0 0 0 0 439,658 3,094,780 2,655,122 85.8 0 797,386 1,281,762 454,376 36.3 0 4,200 10,830 6,630 61.2 0 0 0 0 0 1,241,244 4,357,372 3,116,128 71.5 0 47,000 47,000 0 0 61,271 589,543 528,272 89.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,597 430,292 407,695 94.7 0 0 0 0 0 6,694 163,388 186,694 95~9 0 2,344 54,588 52,244 95.7 0 810,263 511,163 900 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28,947 309,624 280,677 90.7 0 14,758 179,710 164,985 91.8 0 23,568 212,188 188,620 88.9 0 8,304 6~,908 58,604 87.6 0 23,784 152,970 129,186 84.9 0 326,320 603,854 277,534 46.0 0 56,349 1t2,498 56,149 49.9 0 48,276 621,753 573,477 92.2 0 3,319 156,688 153,369 97.9 0 51,300 102,900 51,600 50.1 0 0 0 0 0 6,153 42,305 36,152 85.5 0 1,241,244 4,357,372 3,116,128 71.9 2O 09:19:56 FRRDBR01 SUM 051 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Month~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary oi/oi/oi - 09/30/01 RETIREE PENSIONS Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRA~ TOTALS 01 MISCELLANEOUS PENSIONS 02 POLICE PENSIONS 03 FIRE PENSIONS Totals EXPENDITURE C~ASSIFICATION 53 PENSION BENEFITS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 710 POLICE PENSION FUND 720 FIRE PENSION FUND 730 BENEFIT TRUST $2 FUND Totals 4,253 38,281 51,043 12,762 25.0 151,547 1,277,979 1,813,738 535,759 29.5 148,878 1,284,041 1,798,075 . 514,034 28.6 804,678 2,600,301 3,662,856 1,062,555 29.0 304,678 2,600,246 3,656,306 1,056,060 28.9 0 55 6,550 6,495 99.2 304,678 2,600,301 3,662,856 1,062,555 29.0 1,293 11,640 15,518 3,878 25.0 151,547 1,277,979 1,813,738 535,759 29.5 148,878 1,284,041 1,798,075 514,034 28.6 2,960 26,641 35,525 8,884 25.0 304,678 2,600,301 3,662,856 1,062,555 29.0 10/11/2001 09:19:56 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 RISK MANAGEMENT Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 CASUALTY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 02 MEDICAL INSURANCE Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 32,713 545,929 851,190 305,261 35.9 248,159 2,158,276 2,669,713 513,437 19.2 280,872 2,702,205 3,520,903 ~ 818,698 23.3 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 1,643 38,950 37,307 95.8 58 INSURANCE 280,872 2,700,562 3,481,953 781,391 22.4 Totals 280,872 2,702,205 3,520,903 818,898 23.3 SOURCE OF FUNDS 690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 280,872 2,702,205 3,520,903 818,698 23.3 Totals 280,872 2,702,205 3,520,903 818,698 23.3 22 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months { VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months ( Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 NON-DEPARTMENTAL Cur Mo Y-T~D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaining Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRA~4TOTALS 01 CONTINGENCIES Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 53 PENSION BENEFITS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND Totals 160,493 481,478 641,970 160,492 25.0 160,493 481,478 ~41,970" 160~492 25.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,493 481,478 641,970 160,492 160,493 481,478 641,970 160,492 142,993 428,978 571,970 142,992 17,900 52,500 70,000 17,500 160,493 481,478 641,970 160,492 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 23 10/11/2001 09:19:56 FRRDBR01 SUM 031 9 Months VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 3 Months Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/01 - 09/30/01 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Expended Expended Budget 75.0% ) Completed 25.0% ) Remaini~ Unexpende~ Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 LIBRARY SERVICES Totals EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 90 COMPONENT UNIT EXPENDITURES Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 950 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARy FUND Totals 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100,0 0 4,57~3,0.00 -. 4,573,000 100.0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0 24 PR 0 CLAMA TION "NATIONAL BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH" OCTOBER, 2001 WHEREAS, October 2001 is National Breast Cancer Awareness Month; and WHEREAS, October 19, 2001 is National Mammography Day; and WHEREAS, National Breast Cancer Awareness Month is celebrating its fifteenth year of educating the public about the importance of early detection for breast cancer; and WHEREAS, an estimated 192,000 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2001, and an estimated 1,400 new cases of male breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2001; and WHEREAS, early detection and prompt treatment can significantly reduce suffering and deaths caused by this disease; and WHEREAS, mammography is recognized as the single most effective method of detecting breast changes that may be cancer long before physical symptoms can be seen or felt; and WHEREAS, mammography use has increased substantially and breast cancer death rates have declined. NOW, THEREFORE, I, GeraM L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the month of October 2001 as NATIONAL BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH and October ] 9 as NATIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY DA Y in the Village of Mount Prospect, and I urge all women and their families in the Village to get the facts about breast cancer and mammography. ATTEST: GeraM L. Farley Mayor Velma ~.. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 2~d day of October, 2001. PR 0 CLAMA TIO N "HALLO WEEN" OCTOBER 31, 2001 WHEREAS, the children of Mount Prospect always anticipate the fun and festivities associated with the age-old custom of Halloween by going door to door in their neighborhoods, displaying their costumes and requesting "treats"; and WHEREAS, the possibility of accidents is an ever present threat requiring motorists to be more alert to the presence of children; and WHEREAS, it would appear that parents generally favor the afternoon daylight hours for "trick or treat" outings, since this period permits greater visibility and tends to limit participation to younger children, for whom observance was originally intended. NOW, THEREFORE, [,, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim that HALLOWEEN, also known as TRICK OR TREAT DAY, shall be observed on Wednesday, October 31, 2001. I do further ask that both children and parents cooperate in conducting the time of "Trick or Treat" activities between the hours of 3:00 P.M( and 8500 I also ask that parents or other responsible adults accompany younger children to assure their safety. Finally, I urge cooperation of all citizens, both young and old, to make this a happy and safe occasion for all of our children in the Village of Mount Prospect. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 16th day of October, 2001. illage of Mount ProSpect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BOARD OF TRUSTEES MAYOR GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLEY OCTOBER 12, 2001 COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS YOUTH COMMISSION: New Appointments: Karen Huang 713 Chris Lane 364-7312 Melody A. Ruetsche 610 North Fairview Avenue 590-1847 Senior, Rolling Meadows High School. Application attached. 7th Grade, home schooled. Application attached. GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLEY GLF/rcc c: Millage Manager Michael Janonis Youth Commission President Youth Commission Adult Advisors Cindy Rumore, Police Department I recommend these young people be confirmed by you for service to the community via the Youth Commission. APPLICATION FOR YOUTH COMMISSION MOUNT PROSPECT NAME OF G UAT ON Please answer the following que~ions. If you need additional space, please a~ach a second sheet of paper. Why do you .w.a,nt to se.rye on th.e yout,h commission?,.,, _ , 2. What do you feel are major concerns facing teens today? 3. Please tell a bit about y~urself --,your interests~ your act~vities.etc 4. uan you come to o~e meeting ~monm. Please a~ach ~o le~ers of recommendation by ~o~dults who know you well. Please mail application to Village Manager's O~ce, Village of Mount Prospect, 100 S. Ememon St., Mount Prospect ILL 60056. M~.unt Frospect Youth Commission Registration 9/5/01 1:09 PNt If you are interested in joining the Youth Commission, please complete this application, and returr the address below. N m /Yteioc y "' " Schoo Grade Please complete the foflowing questions. If you need more space for your answers, you can attacP sheet of paper. Why do you want to serve on the Youth Commission? co~,~,,~;+,~, o..,.'~r:~ '"'7' What do you feel are major issues facing teens today? Please tell a little about yourself (interests, activities) ¢.2n vnn ntfnnd nnn rnn~finn n mnnth9 http://www.vil.mou nt-prospect.il.us/board/a Cplication-htm Page 1 of 2 0 South Emerson Street · Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Telephone: 847/2534675 September 5, 2001 '"" Director Youth .Commission Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Sir or Madam: I am very pleased to recommend Melody Ruetsche for membership on the Mount Prospect Youth Commission. Melody and I first became acquainted several years ago through frequent visits she made with her family to the Mount Prospect Public Library. This past spring she was part of a community volunteer group working on an Eagle Scout project in Youth Services. Then, in June, she joined the ranks of our teen volunteers and continues to provide many hours of service as a Library Volunteen. She assisted very capably and enthusiastically at our summer reading desk, where she interacted with children and parents as they participated in the Library's summer reading program. Plus, she works on a variety of other projects assigned by Library staff, including shelving, sorting, inventory and data entry. She is multi-talented and eager. As Volunteen supervisor, I find Melody very dependable and co~mmitted to her volunteer service at the Library. She is reliable, demonstrates a mature attitude toward her work, and takes great pride in doing an excellent job. It is a delight to work with Melody and I am pleased to recommend her without reservation. Sincerely, Mary ;~nn Sibrava, MLS Youlh' Services Librarian rs. Cathy Csech 9534 Lexington Ave. Brookfield, IL. 60513 (708) 485- 2594 SeptemSer 4, 2001 Mt. Prospect Youth Commission Mt. prospect, IL. 60056 To Whom It May Concern: I am very pleased and honored to recommend Ms. Melody Ann Ruetsche to the Mt. Prospect Youth Commission. Melody has many fine qualities that will help serve her community well. Melody is a Volunteen at the Mt. Prospect Public Library. She is a Cadette Girl Scout and is presently working toward the Girl ScoUt Silver Award. Melody is a member of the Girl Scout Chorus, as well. She serves her church by being an altar server. Melody is, also, a member of the Teen Advisory Board, in Mt. Prospect. She is a member of the Des Plaines Lattof YMCA, where she participates in various sports; basketball and handball are her favorite! I have known Melody for ten years, as I was her first teacher in preschool. We have kept in touch throughout the years. Melody continues to do well in school with honors and straight A's. It has been a pleasure to know Melody. She is a fine citizen, and Mt. Prospect-is privileged to have her. Most Sincerely, Cathy G~ech illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 12, 2001 ZBA-28-01 - VARIATION (LOT COVERAGE) 1002 S. NAWATA AVENUE RONALD & JOANN SCI-ILACHTER- APPLICANTS The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-28-01, a request for a lot coverage variation, as described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their September 27, 2001 meeting. The subject property is an interior lot in a single-family residential neighborhood. The petitioners applied for a permit to replace the existing circular driveway and patio with brick pavers. During the review process, it was determined that the site exceeded the maximum amount of lot coverage permitted and that the patio and circular driveway would have to be scaled back in size to meet code requirements. Village records do not show that a permit was obtained for the circular drive or the patio. The petitioners, who are the current property owners, purchased the home 8 years ago and the patio and circular driveway were there already and have not been expanded. In an effort to comply with Village codes, the petitioners reduced the size of the circular drive and eliminated a service walk. They do not intend to modify the size or loeatiun of the patio and are seeking a variation to permit 62% lot coverage. The Zoning Board heard testimony fi-om neighbors confu'ming that the driveway and patio were installed before the petitioners purchased the home. The neighbors stated that they supported the petitioners' request because the neighborhood does not have any flooding problems and the petitioners maintain the house very well. The ZBA discussed the petitioners' request and how the previous homeowner created a situation that does not meet Village codes. They discussed the memo from the Engineering Division that states that they do not object to the varafiun. The ZBA also reviewed how this request is unique and could not be used as a precedent in future requests for relief from lot coverage: the property in question has a side loading garage, the house is setback a significant distance from the front lot line, and the property is located in close proximity to Golf Road, which requires special consideration for a safe means in/out of the garage and additional pavement. In addition, the ZBA discussed the difficulty associated in reducing the size of the patio due to the necessary structural modifications. The Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 5-0 to recommend approval of a request for a lot coverage variation at 1002 S. NaWaTa Ave., Case No. ZBA-28.01. ' Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their October 16, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. (Jooney, Jr., At~P CASE NO. ZBA-28-01 PETITIONERS: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: MINUrES OF T~ REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Hearing Date: September 27, 2001 Ronald & Joann Schlachter, Property Owners September 12, 2001 Journal & Topics Lot Coverage Variation to replace an existing patio & driveway Merrill Cotton Leo Floros Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Arlene Juracek, Chairperson None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Judy Connolly, AICP, S~nior Planner Mike Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director Ronald & Joaun Schlachter Stan & Florence Holbrook Larry & Angola Biancalana Chairperson Arlene Juraeek called the meeting to order at 7:35p.m. The minutes of the August 23, 2001 meeting were approved 4-0, Merrill Cotton abstained from voting. At 7:51, Chairperson Arlene Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA- 28-01, a request for a Variation to lot coverage. Judy Connolty, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Counolly stated that the applicants applied for a permit to replace the existing concrete patio and asphalt circular driveway using brick pavers material. During the permit review process, it was determined that the site exceeded the maximum amount of lot coverage Ms. Connolly explained that, in an attempt to comply with Zoning regulations, the petitioners revised the permit application so a portion of the circular driveway and a section of the north service walk along the side of the house were removed. Although the patio does not comply with setback requirements, the Zoning Ordinance allows for it to be replaced in kind, but only if the site meets lot coverage requirements (Sec. 14.402.B). Currently, there is 78% lot coverage, but the proposed modifications reduces lot coverage to 62%. The petitioners do not intend to modify the size or location of the patio and are seeking a variation to allow 62% lot coverage while the maximum amount permitted by the Zoning Ordinance is 45%. Ms. Counolly said Staffreviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, proposed modifications, visited the site, and examined Building Permit records. The parcel is a little more than 8,100 square feet and is out of the flood zone. The subject property has a 2,976.43 square foot house and attached garage, a circular driveway, and a patio. Village records show that a permit for the house and garage was issued in 1973, but the permit does not include the circular drive or the patio. Several years later, a permit was issued for a standard driveway that measured 2i-feet wide. Although the Village does not have a record of the property owners applying for or receiving the necesgary permits, the driveway was expanded into a circular driveway and the patio was added. The petitioners, who are the ourrent property owners, purchased the home 8 years ago and the patio and circular driveway were there already and hav~ not bgen ~xpaoded. Ms. Connolly pointed out that the entrance to the house is setback almost 54-feet from the frgnt 10t line and. lh~ side- loading garage is setback 30-feet from the front lot line. The house and garage cover 37% of the lot. In order to comply with the 45% lot coverage requirement, total square footage of the driveway, patio and service walks combined cannot exceed 680 square feet. The applicants propose to reduce the circular diive and replace the existing patio and driveway because there are cracks in some places and need to be repaired Zoning Board of Appeals Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA-28-200! Page 2 Ms. Cunnolly reported that other departments have reviewed the request and recommended a reduction in lot coverage so the site complies with Village regulations. The Engineering Division does not object to the variation, but supports a reduction in lot coverage. Engineering said that the amount of runoff generated by the amount of proposed lot coverage should not adversely impact the storm sewers, but states that this situation is an isolated case and should not be used as a reference for future relief from lot coverage requests. In addition, there is a S-foot easement along the south side of the house, which is paved over and uses as a service walk. She said that the service walk is essential because it is used to enter and exit the house. The petitioners are aware that there is a public storm sewer under the service walk and understand that if any work needs to be done in this area that the service walk will be removed and that they are responsible for any costs associated with replacing it. Therefore, Public Works docs not object to the variation request. Ms. Counolly said the applicants would like to keep the same size patio because it "fits" with their lifestyle and feel that it would be difficult to redesign the patio area with respect to the roofed area over the patio. Although an exact replacement of the patio would not have a negative effect on the public welfare or other properties, reducing the size of the patio would help the site to comply with Village code regulations. The petitioners could eliminate the patio, reduce the driveway so it measures 548 square feet, and reduoe the south service walk so the site meets the 45% lot coverage regulation. The hardship is not created bemuse of a physical attribute of the property, but rather by the previous owner who neglected to obtain a permit from the Village and created a situation that does not comply with Village codes. In order to approve the variation, the request must meet the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance. These standards relate to: a hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property and not created.by any person presently having an interest in the property; a lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The impact of the variation would be minor since the patio will not be enlarged. Ms. Connolly said that the Village is not aware of any drainage problems and several neighbors sent letters supporting the petitioners' request. However, the request fails to meet the standards for a variation and eliminating existing structures could further reduce the amount of lot coverage. Based on these findings, Stattrecommends that the ZBA recommend denial for the proposed lot coverage Variation at 1002 S. NaWaTa Ave. The Village Board's decision is final for this case besause the request exceeds 25% of what is permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Zoning Board members discussed with Ms. Counolly the various options for the driveway proposed by staff. Ronald Sclflachter was sworn in and Mr. Schlachter said they would prefer to follow Option #1, his original design, because they have a side-loading garage and had trouble getting cars in and out. He said they had inherited the problem from the former owner and wanted to comply with Village Codes, but would prefer not to take out a portion of the patio as that would leave the roof structure covering a grassy area. He noted that it is not in a sunny area and it would be difficult to keep grass growing there. Ms. Juracek asked if the roof over the patio was part of the house roof structure. Mr. Schlachter said that it was attached to the house and the area over the patio was supported by 4x8 beams with steel trellises every four feet. Ms. Juracek asked if removing the roof over the patio would cause a structural issue with the remainder of the roof. Mr. Schlachter said it would be necessary to cut into the rafters to modify the roof of the house, which had been there for 28 years. Ms. Juracek asked if audience members wished to speak. Lawrence Biancalana, 1005 NaWaTa, was sworn in and testified that the Schlachter house had the same driveway, sidewalks and patio since he had moved there 26 years ago. He said that they do not experience flooding problems in the area and said he thought it would detract from the appearance of the house to have a roof section over a grassy area. Stan Holbrook, 1006 NaWaTa, was sworn in. He said that the Schlachters were wonderful people and maintained a beautiful home. He noted that they entertain their guests on the patio without interference to the neighbors' enjoyment of their homes. He said he did not think the 8chlachters should be punished for the previous owners' actions~ oning Board of Appeals Z~A-2g-2001 Arlene Suraeak, Chairperson Page 3 Ms. Juracek asked the petitioner if he would plant grass in the area that the driveway was removed. Mr. Schlachter said that he planned to plant grass and flowers. Mr. Floros asked if the driveway and patio would be constructed of brick pavers. Mr. Schlacter said yes. Mr. Rogers complimented the petitioner on his lovely house and landscaping. At 8:00, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board. Mr. Rogers said the property, although gorgeous, was way beyond the lot coverage restrictions and that he was concerned with setting a precedent if the variation was approved. He noted that the petitioner was removing a circular driveway and sidewalk, but said that removing part of the patio would not be good for the structure. Leo Floros said the coverage violation was not the petitoner's doing and that the petitioner should not be punished for the previous owners failure to obtain permits. He also said that the petitioner will reduce the lot coverage from 78% to 62% and that he would support him in his request for a Variation. Kcith Youugquist said he favored Option #1 because of the difficulty in maneuvering cars in and out of a side4oading garage and that the other options, showing a smaller driveway, could create problems when maneuvering ears in and out of the garage. He also pointed out that not too many circular driveways are removed, as in this ease, and that the petitioner had acquired the problems with the house. Therefore, he would support the petitioner's request. Men'ill Cotton said he would support this case, which would stand on its own merits and not be setting a precedent because the petitioner had inherited the problem. Ms. luraeek said she was amazed that so much lot coverage had no impact on the storm sewers in the area, but had come to the meeting with an open mind. She said itwas obvious some Variation to lot coverage would be necessary because of the size of the house and its deep setback. She said the garage could not be changed to fxont4oading so a wide driveway is necessary. She also noted that that petitioner was willing to put in brick pavers and extra landscaping. She said this was a pre-existing condition, it would not set precedent, and she would support the request. Richard Rogers moved to recommend approval to the Village Board of the requgst for a Variation to lot coverage as shown in Option #1, removing the north sidewalk and using brick pavers for the driveway and patio, for Case No. ZBA-28-01. Leo Floros seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: Motion was approved 5-0. At 8:47 p.m., Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Merrill Cotten. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary $~d~ Canndl~yl Semo; Plarmer Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 ZISA-28-01 - LOT COVERAGE VARIATION 1002 S. NAWATA AVENUE (SCHLACHTI~R RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND INFORMATION PETITIONERS: STATUS OF PETITIONER: PARCEL NUMBER: LOT SIZE: EXISTING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: LOT COVERAGE: Ronald & Joann Schlachter 1002 S. NaWaTa Avenue Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Property Owners 08-14-219-002 REQUESTED ACTION: 8,125 square feet R1 Single Family Residence Single Family Residence 78% existing 62% proposed 45% maximum per R1 district. LOT COVERAGE VARIATION (P,.EPLACE AN EXISTING PATIO & DR_Vv'EWAY) BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION The subject property is an existing home located on an interior lot on a single-family residential street. The applicants applied for a p~rrnit to replace the existing concrete patio and asphalt circular driveway using brick paver material. During the review process, it was determined that the site exceeded the maximum amount of lot coverage permitted and that the patio and circular driveway would have to be sealed back in size to meet code requirements. In an attempt to comply with Zoning regulations, the petitioners revised the permit application so a portion of the circular driveway and a section of the north service walk along the side of the house were removed (see attached exhibit labeled "Proposed Modifications"). The petitioners do not intend to modify the size or location of the patio. ZBA-28-01 ZBA Meeting September 27, 2001 Page 2 Although the patio does not comply with setback requirements, the Zoning Ordinance allows for it to be replaced in fdhd, but only if the site meets lot coverage requirements (See. 14.402.B). Currently, there is 78% lot coverage and with the proposed modifications, the amount of lot coverage is reduced to 62%. Since the petitioners would like to replace the patio in kind, they are seeking a lot coverage variation. The attached exhibit labeled "Existing Conditions" shows the size and location of the patio and circular driveway. The subject property has a 2,976.43 square foot house and attached garage, a circular driveway, and a patio. Village records show that a permit for the house and garage was issued in 1973, but the building plans do not include the cimular drive or the patio. Several years later, a permit was issued for a standard driveway that measured 21ofeet wide. Although the Village does not have a record of the property owners applying for or receiving the necessary permits, the driveway was expanded into a circular driveway and the patio was added. The petitioners, who are the current property owners, purchased the home 8 years ago and the patio and circular driveway were there already and have not been expanded. To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. REQUIRED FINDINGS Variation Standards Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These standards relate to: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topograph/cal conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; ~ lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The subject parcel is an 8,125 square foot parcel that is out of the flood zone. Most of the site is level, but there is a steep grade difference towards the rear of the property. The parcel is developed with a single family home and an attached garage. The applicants propose to reduce the circular drive and replace the existing patio and driveway because the structures are cracked in some places and need to be repaired. The entrance to the house is setback almost 54-feet from the front lot line and the side-loading garage is setback 30-feet from the front lot line. The house and garage cover 37% of the lot. In order'to comply with the 45% lot coverage requirement, total square footage of the driveway, patio and service walks combined cannot exceed 680 square feet. Other departments have reviewed the request and recommended a reduction in lot coverage so the site complies with Village regulations. The enclosed memo from the Engineering Division states that they do not objee~ to the variation, but support a reduction in lot enverage. Engineering states that the amount of nmoff generated by the amount of proposed lot coverage should not adversely impact the storm sewers, but that this situation is an isolated case and should not be used as a reference for future relief from lot coverage requests. In addition, there is a 5-foot easement along the south side of the house, which is paved over. The existing service walk is essential because it is used to enter and exit the house. The petitioners are aware that there is a public storm sewer under the service walk and understand that if any work needs to be done in this area that the service walk will be removed and that they are respgnsible for any costs associated with replacing it. BA-28-O1 2~A Meeting September 27, 2001 Page 3 The applicants would like to keep the same size patio because it "fits" with their lifestyle and feel that it would be difficult to redesign the patio area with respect to the roofed area of the patio. Although an exact replacement of the patio would not have a negative effect on the public welfare or other properties, reducing the size of the patio would help the site to comply with Village code regulations. The petitioners could eliminate the patio, reduce the driveway so it measures 548 square feet (see enclosed exhibit labeled "Option $~4), and reduce the south service walk so the site meets the 45% lot coverage regulation. The hardship is not created because of a physical atlribute of the property, but rather by the previous owner who neglected to obtain a permit from the Village and created a situation that does not comply with Village codes. Please note that the attached exhibits labeled Option 1, 2, 3, 4 were prepared by staff to show how the driveway could be modified to reduce overall lot coverage. The petitioners' request is labeled "Petitioners' Proposed Modifications" and is the subject of thc Variation case. RECOMMENDATION The impact of the variation would be minor since the patio will not be enlarged, thc Village is not aware of any drainage problems, and several neighbors sent letters suppon'ing the petitioners' request. However, the request fails to meet the standards for a variation and elimfmating existing structures could further reduce the amount of lot coverage. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend denial for the proposed lot coverage Variation at 1002 S. NaWaTa Ave., Case No. ZBA-28-01. The Village Board's decision is finsl for this case because the request exceeds 25% of what is permitted by the Zoning Ordinance~ I concur: William J[ Cooney, MC'P, Director of Community Development 913 912 0 913 912 ~ 913 910 ~ 913 '~ .915 914~ 915 914 '~ ~ 915 912 ~ ~ 915 ~ 917 916 ~ ~ 917 916 ~ 917 914 ~ 919 918 ~ 919 918' ~ 919 916 ] ~ ~ Church ~ 921 920 ~ 921 920 ~ 921 ~ ~ 923 922~,~ 923 922 ~ 923 ~ ~ Golf Road ~ooo ~ ~ ~ 1003 1010 ~ 1004 1005 ~ Church ~ Palm Dr~ve a ~o~o [__ f~ ~-- ~ 1011 ~ ~ g] ~ ~ ~ ~ 1013 1020 ~ ___ ~ 1015 1022 ~ 1015 1016 ~ 1017 ~ 1017 1018 ] ~ 1019 1026 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1021 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ BelAire ~.-- - -- ~ ~ 1023 1030 Wdlow Lane ~ 1040 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1050 ZBA-28:01 Schlachter Residence 1002 S. NaWaTa Avenue - Lot Coverage Variation 913 912 .915 914 917 916 919 918 921 920 923 922 913 912 915 914 917 916 919 918 921 920 923 922 913 910 915 912 917 914 919 916 921 923 e- e- Existing Conditions 01 ~ Remove & Redu6e · portions of the ! circular driveway Petitioners' Proposed Modification portion of service walk ount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: SENIOR PLANNER JUDY CONNOLLY PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK LINDELOF SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 ZBA-27-01; LOT COVERAGE VARIATION (100~NA-WA-TA AVE.) We have completed our review of ZBA-27-01. Because this is an existing condition, presumably built before the current lot coverage restrictions were adopted, we have no objection to the proposed variation. Furthermore, we support, and strongly encourage any and all reduction in impervious surface on site. It should be noted that the Village storm sewers were not designed with the capacity to carry the stormwater runoff generated by such an extremely large pementage of impervious surface. Thus, while we believe that isolated lots such as this will not have a significant impact on the existing storm sewer system, this should not be misconstrued as a precedent for future construction. It should also be noted that portions of the existing patio, retaining wall, and private sidewalk extend into a public utility easement along the south side of the property. A public storm sewer exists in this easement, beneath these features. We do not suggest removing these features from the easement at this time, but it must be stressed that if any maintenance is required on any utility within the easement, it shall be the homeowner's responsibility to remove and replace these features as needed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Chuck Lindelof X:~FILES~ENGIN E EF{~REV- E NG~.BA~2001\1002NaWaTa. DOC ,VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Plarmtng D!wslo 100 $. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847,818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Variation Request The Zoning Board of Appeals has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and those variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's Zoning Ordinance. PETITION FOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REVIEW 12 Village Board Final 12 ZBA Final Common Address(es) (Sweet Number, Street) Tax I.D. Number or C. ounty Assignod Pin Number(s) 0 ~-/q.-~.-/?-vo~-o~'~'o .. o¢9 Legal Description (attach additional ~hcets if necessary) ~g~'/n/£- ~ ,.c~p/~'/j/ ~,,/ ~? ?/~gff'~,~Tg~ve/'7, V~_ ~/r c~z.~7~/ /~/ 7~/~t qame Telephone (day) Corporation Telephone (evening) Street Address Fax City .~' State Zip Code Pager Name Telephone (day) Co~tion "' Tcleph~e (evenin~ Ci~ S~te Zip Code Pager Atto~ey N~o Telephone (day) Ad~e~ F~ Su~eyor N~e Telephone (day) Ad~e~ Engineer N~e ] Telephone (day) Architect Nme Telephone Oa7): Land*cap~ Architect N~e Telephone (day): ,,. Ad.ess , F~ Phone 8~.7.818.5328 Fax 847.8i8~5329 TDD 847392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 2 ode Soction(s) for which Variation(s) is (are) Requested Summary and Instiilcation for Requested Variation(s), Relate SustifiCation to the Attached Standards for Variations Please note that the application will not be accepted until chis petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appoinlmant with the appropriate Village staff.so chat materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration of the information contained in chis petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested chat approval I~ given to chis request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the propen'y grant employees ofche Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hour~ for visual inspection ofche subject property. I hereby aft'mn that ali information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with chis application are tree and If applicant'is not pro[~erty owner. I hereby designate che applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting_mate,~aL~ ~/~ Mount Prospect Deparlmant of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 3 · Phone-$47.$18.~328 -- Fa~ 847.81~§329 TDD 847.392.6064 ariation Request Ronald and Joann Schlachter 1002 Na-Wa-Ta Avenue Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s) Two major reasons we purchased our house in 1993 were because of its impressive circular driveway and large patio. We use our patio every day, weather permitting, and it has become an extension of our home. We ware unaware that these two features were in violation of Mt Prospect code because they occupied more square footage than allowed. We discovered this fact when we went for a permit to replace our cracked and crumbling patio wlth brick pavers. We unly found out the conditiun of the conereta recently when we removed the worn all-weather carpeting. We would like to replace the concrete patio and install brick pavers. We respectfully request a variance that would allow us to replace the patio with the same size patio in brick pavers. We are going to replace our circular blacktop driveway with a conventional driveway in brick pavers and restore the circular part to grass again. We are also going to break up the concrete walkway to the North of our house and restore it with gross. We are willing to make these additional investments to show our good faith in complying with the Mt. Prospect code in the hope that the Zoning Board will approve our request. We have never had any flooding problems nor have any of our neighbors complained about having flooding problems. The house is 28 years old and has had the eireular driveway, side concrete walkways, and the existing patio for just about the same number of years according to the neighbors. It is our intention to beautify and maintain our proper~ in Mt Pwspect. Please grant us a variance to replace the existing patio with the same size patio in brick pavers. ~l~on~ld Schla~r, Sr. Applicant: ~ Se-hlachter ' · ...... ugust 24, 2001 Village of Mt. Prospect Community Development Department Planning Division 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Zoning Board: My neighbors, Ronald and Joann Schlachter, who live across the street from me, are requesting a variance from the Village of Mt. Prospect so that they can replace their existing concrete patio with brick pavers without having to sacrifice the size of their patio. Ron and Joarm are great neighbors and have maintained their house, inside and out, in an exemplary fashion. Their circular driveway, side walkways, and patio have existed for just about 28 years--long before Joaun and Ron moved herein 1993. I am the original owner of my house at 1003 Na-Wa-Ta Avenue and have lived here since 1975. Ron and Joann Schiachter said they were going to remove their existing driveway and replace it with brick pavers. They also intend to replace the circular portion with grass. In addition, they said they would break up the concrete walkway on the North side of their house and restore the area with grass. They are will'mg to do this so that the Zoning Board will approve their request for a patio variance. - I have no objection to any of their improvements and recommend that the Zoning Board grant the variance that Ron and Joarm Schlachter request allowing them to replace their existing patio with a same-size brick-paver patio. I think we should all be very pleased that they are willing to make the investment in the maintenance of their home. Respectfully yours, 1003 Na-Wa-Ta Avenue Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 847-364-6821 Lm fhcb~_ ¼o'm~., alinaksha V. Joshl MD. V~mmer ~ ~ 810 W. Bieaterfidd Rd. Suite # 407. Elk Grove V'dl~g~ IL 60007. Board Certified in Nenrolo~ & Clinical Neurophystology. Tel: - (773)395-8200. Fax: - (7'/3)395-8400. Doctors Of F~ee Building- 1. 10?S Barrington RtL Suite # S30. ltoffmnn ~stnte. IL 60194. 8-27-01. To, Zoning Board. Village of Mt. Prospect. Dear Sir. I live at 1004 S. Na-Wa-Ta Avert. Mt. Prospect. Next door to Ron And JoAnn Schlachler. They want to put brick patio in the rear and take away their half of the front driveway obeying the village code. The patio has bcea there for many years, ever since I moved in to my house in 1978. The renovation will definitely improve the look of the house, the neighhouring properties and the community. Being a next door neighbor I will be glad to see the brick patio. The couple is very nice, heiping kind to all the neighbors. I do not have any objection in them improving their house as above and I sincerely hope that the permission be granted for the renovation they are seeking for. Thank you. Sincerely yours. N. V. Joshi MD. vwl 10/10#01 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1002 SOUTH NA-WA-TA AVENUE WHEREAS, Ronaid and Joann Schlachter (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 1002 South Na-Wa-Ta Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Property Index Number: 08-14-219-002 Lot 51 in Kaplan Braun's 4th Addition to Mount Prospect Unit #1 being a subdivision of part of the N. ~ of Sec. 14, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the 3rd Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to replace an existing patio and driveway, which will exceed the 45% maximum lot coverage allowed by the Mount Prospect Village Code; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of ZBA Case No. 28-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mou. nt Prospect on the 27~ day of September, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice hawng been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 12th day of September, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined.that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. Page 2/2 1002 S. Na-Wa-Ta Avenue NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, to allow the replacement of a patio and driveway, which will exceed the maximum amount of lot coverage allowed by the Mount Prospect Village Code, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of . ,2001. ATTEST: Gerald L. Fadey Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Sitc Plan O: Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: OCTOBER 12, 2001 SUBJECT: ZBA-29-01-CONDITIONAL USE. 303 DOUGLAS DON CRAIG - APPLICANT The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-29-01, a request for a circular/dual frontage drive, as described in detail in the attached ZBA staff report. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their September 27, 2001 meeting. The subject property is a comer lot at the southeast comer of Douglas and White Oak, located across the street from Carefree Park, in a single-family residential neighborhood. Douglas Avenue was designed with a substandard width and the petitioner would like to construct a circular/dual frontage driveway to provide adequate off-street par!ring. One driveway would be accessed from Douglas Avenue and connect to another driveway aecessed from White Oak. Both driveways would lead to the same three-ear garage. The Zoning Board discussed the size of the lot, the petitioner's decision to use decorative materials for the driveways, and the impact of Douglas Avenue having a substandard width. The ZBA stated that the circular drive would help to mitigate the homeowner's potential parking problems and that the two driveways would be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood because only one driveway would be visible on each street frontage, i.e. one drive on Douglas and one drive on White Oak. The Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 5- 0 to recommend approval of a request for a circular/dual frontage drive at 303 Douglas, Case No. Z~A-29-01. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their October 16, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. MINUTES OF TIlE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-29-01 PETITIONERS: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: September 27, 2001 Donald Craig, Agent for Property Owners September 12, 2001 Journal & Topics Conditional Use to allow a circular (dual frontage) drive Merrill Cotten Leo Floros Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Arlene Juracek, Chairperson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jqdy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Donald Craig Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. The minutes of the August 23, 2001 meeting we~c approved 4-0, Merrill Cotton abstained from voting. At 8:20, Chairperson Arlene Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-29- 01, a request for a Conditional Use for a circular driveway. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the case. Ms. Connolly stated that the subjec~ property is a corner lot located across the street from Carefree Park. The property owners are in the process of building new home and recently consolidated two lots to create one lot of record. The property owners would like to instal driveway that has one curb cut on White Oak and one curb cut on Douglas. This request requires Conditional Usc approval. Ms. Cormolly testified that the property next door recently received approval for a circular drive w/th 2 curb cuts Douglas. As noted in that staff memo, Douglas Avenue north of Lincoln Street and south of White Oak Street has substandard right-of-way width and the street measures 25-feet from the back-of-curb. Ms. Connolly said the petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval to install a circular (dual frontage) drive for similar reasons stated ha the application for 305 Douglas, which include providing adequate guest parking since Douglas Street has parking restrictions which allow parking on one side of the street ('No Parking on the west side of Douglas) and street itself has a substandard width. The petitioner states that having guests park in the circular drive will benefit safety and welfare and that the circular drive will be constructed from brick pavers or a similar decorative materiai so ~ will be aesthetically pleasing. Staff reviewed the petitioners~ plat of survey and site plan, and visited the site. The subject property is approximately 2/3 of an acre and the applicant proposes to construct a driveway in the exterior side yard Douglas Avenue that continues on to a driveway in the front yard of White Oak. Staff evaluated traffic patterns ~n neighborhood and found that Douglas Street is partially closed because of the construction at 303 & 305 Douglas. there is only one other house on the block, staff relied on information from the 1998 ?!an Commission p~blic again, which stated that people have historically parked on Douglas Street when their children played at Carefree and that Douglas Street would be difficult to navigate during ballgames because the slreet would be so congested. Ms. Cormolly said each frontage of the property would have a driveway; 10% of the exterior side yard, which is Douglas, would be paved (used as a driveway) and almost 22% of the front yard on White Oak would be paved (~scd driveway). The site complies with lot coverage requirements and the driveways would occupy less than the 35% yard coverage referenced in (Sec. 14.2215.A.3) the Zoning Ordinance. ~l~e request would be in keeping with the policy of maintaining an open, green front yard. oning Board of Appeals ZBA~29-2001 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 Ms. Connolly said the Engineering Division reviewed the petitioner's request and did not object to the request because the drainage system would not be impacted. Ms. Connolly reported that the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and findings must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to the request having a: · detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Villag~ streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and mhe~ Village Ordinances. Ms. Cormolly also said that the Safety Con'anission had met after staff'i memorandum on the case had been sent, The Safety Commission did vote to restrict parking to just one side of Douglas Street. Ms. Cormolly reported that, based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the residence at 303 Douglas Street, Case No. ZBA-29-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. Richard Rogers asked for confirmation that this was a dual driveway, not a circular driveway. Ms. Connolly said the Zoning Code classifies such driveways under the heading of"circular", but this one would have curb cuts on two different streets, not two curb cuts on one street. Ms. Juracek asked Ms. Cormolly why this case was not presented at the same time as the ZBA-17-01,305 W. Douglas, case. Ms. Cormolly said she did not know and that the petitioner was present to answer that question. Don Craig was sworn in and said the house for this site had not been drawn at the time the other Douglas Street .case came before the Zoning Board. He said he had nothing to add to Ms. Connolly's presentation of this case, which he said had been quite thorough. At 8:25 p.m., Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board. Richard Rogers moved to recommend to the Village Board approval of the request for a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for Case No. ZBA-29*01, as presented with one curb cut on two separate streets: Merrill Cotton seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Rogers, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: Motion was approved 5-1. At 8:47 p.m., Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Merrill Cotten. The morion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary ~ tt:~a,~rs~z.~^~z~^.2o~i~,,,~m~^.2~,,o,~o~ ~-' ~ddyC°~}}h°Ily'Y3eni°rPlanner ~/ Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBIECT: TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JUP, ACEK, CHAIRPERSON JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 ZBA-29-01 -CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A CIRCULAR (DUAL FRONTAGE) DRIVE / 303 DOUGLAS STREET (CRAIG RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND INFORMATION PETITIONER: Donald S. Craig 1040 Arbor Cour~ Mount Prospect, IL STATUS OF PETITIONER: Agent for Property Owners PARCEL NUMBER: 08-10-114-139 & -140 (PIN#s will change as the lot was recently consolidated to a oneqot subdivision) LOT SIZE: 28,043 square feet (2/3 acre) EXISTING ZONING: K1 Single Family Kesidence EXISTING LAND USE: Single Family l~esidence LOT COVERAGE: 29.5% proposed lot coverage 45% lot coverage maximum per R1 District REQUESTED ACTION: CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CIRCULAR (DUAL FRONTAGE) DRIVEWAY. BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE The subject property is a corner lot located across the street from Carefree Park. The property owners are in the process of building a new home and recently consolidated two lots to create one lot of record that measures 2/3 acre. The property owners would like to install a circular (dual frontage) drivcway~that has one curb cut on White · Oak and one curb cut on Douglas, which requires Conditional Use approval. The property next door, 305 Douglas, recently received approval for a circular drive. As noted in the staff memo for the circular drive at 305 Douglas, Douglas Avenue north of Lincoln S~'eet and~ Sou~ of W~te .Qak substandard fight-of-way width and street that measures 25-feet from the back-to-back of the curb. ZBA-29-01 Meeting of September 27, 2001 Page 2 The petitioner is seeking Conditional Usc approval to install a circular (dual frontage) drive for similar reasons stated in the application for 305 Douglas, which include providing adequate guest parking since Douglas Street has parking on the east side of the street only and the street is a substandard width. As noted in the petitioner's previous ZBA application, the petitioner states that having guests park in the circular drive will benefit public safety and welfare and that the circular drive will be constructed from brick pavers or a similar decorative material so it will be aesthetically pleasing. To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioners* plat of survey and site plan, and visited the site. REQUIRED FINDINGS Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. (The circular drive is listed as a Conditional Use in the parking section of the Zoning Ordinance (Sec. 14.2215.A. 1). These standards relate to: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The subject property for the proposed Conditional Use is a 28,043 square foot parcel. The applicant Proposes to construct a driveway in the exterior side yard of Douglas Avenue that continues on to a driveway in the front yard of White Oak. Staff evaluated traffic patterns in the neighborhood and found that Douglas Street is partially closed because of the construction at 303 & 305 Douglas. Since there is only one other house on the block, staff relied on information from the 1998 Plan Commission public hearing again, which stated that people have historically parked on Douglas Street when their children played at Carefree Park, and that Douglas Street would be difficult to navigate during ballgames because the street would be so congested. Each frontage of the property would have a driveway; 10% of the exterior side yard setback (Douglas Avenue) would be used as a driveway and 21.9% of the front yard setback (White Oak) would be vsed as a driveway. The site complies with lot coverage requirements and the circular (dual frontage) drive would occupy less than the 35% yard lot coverage referenced in Sec. 14.2215.A.3 of the Zoning Ordinance. The request would be in keeping with the Village's policy of maintaining an open, green front yard. The Engineering Division reviewed the petitioner's request and did not object to having a circular (dual frontage) driveway because the drainage system would not be impacted. As noted in the staff memo for a circular drive at 305 Douglas, Douglas Street has a substandard width and people who frequent Carefree Park typically park on the east side of the street. The petitioner proposes to use brick pavers to construct the circular drive and the lot size is consistent with two lots of record. Since each frontage would have one driveway and the size of the property is typical of two lots of record, a second driveway would be in keeping with the Village's policy of maintaining a "green" fr.0nt yard. The circular driveway would not have a BA-29-01 Meeting of September 27, 2001 Page 3 negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed Conditional Use would not affect,the character of the neighborhood, nor would it have any significant effect on the public welfare. RECOMMENDATION The proposed circular (dual frontage) driveway meets the Conditional Use standards conta'med in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Orcrmance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Z~A make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a circular driveway for the residence at 303 Douglas Street, Case No. ZBA-29-01. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: IIL. AIC~P,~Di~r c~tor of Commumty Development William J. (~~ey, · ' ' 4., 98-~9-~! 99:45 VILLAG~ OF HT PROSPECT ID= VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAIt.TMtrNT - Planning Division 100 S. Ew.=rsou Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.$328 Application for Conditional 'Use'. Approval Ca.~ Number ZBA Development Name/Address Date of Submission '" Add~e.~s<es) (S~r~t lq',,,-her, 303 Douglas Avenue Site A~ea (Acres) R1Pmp*r~y Zon~tg { To~al Building Sq. 1~ 6qite) [ Setback;: Building Height Lot Coverage ! %) Number of Parklng Spaces 27.75 f~ (raid point) N/A North South ] East SIR SFR [ SFP,. or County AssigneA Fn N~er(s) io-/t q--. 13q - Legal Description (attach mdditlonal sheet~ ifneces;ary) W~t park Name [ Donald S. Craig [ Corporation 1{)40 Arbor Cou~t Mount Prospect Agent for OWner · IL { ~)056 Telcphone (day) 847/545-1925 Telephone 545-1498 Pager 8-99-~1 ~9:49 VILLAGE OF HT PROSPECT ID= PogG Proposed Conditional Us~ (as lis~l in ~t~ zocing disiric0 Circuhr Dri¥c ($cc. D~scn'o~ in Detail tbe Buildings sad Ac:ivilias Ptoposed and How the Propo.~l Usc Meets the Attached Sia~da~ds for Condh/on~l Usc Approval (auach acklifi :real shee~s if necessary) Hour~ of Opera~ion Site Area (Acles) P~openy Zoni~s Total Buildin~ Sq. Ft. ($i~c) Sq. Irt. Devoted to Proposed Use Buil41'a~ Height L~I Coverage (%) Number of Parldnll Spaces N/A Plea.se no~e d~t thc application will no~ bc reviewed ~niil t[~s petit/on has bcc~ fully completed and all required phns and othe~ materials havebeensslisfactoffiysubmi'ited~o~leP!e,,n~,,gDi~'ision. Incor~lelesubmi~tahwillnotbeaccep~cd. kisstron§lysu,~ges~ed~hat~c pegtioner schedule an appoinm~ent wi~h ~hc appm0pfiile Village s~affso ~t matcrlals can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness ~ of submimL In consideration of the information conm/ncd/n ~is p;l/tion as well ss all suppordn§ documentation, il h ~cquested that approval be pjven ~o dgs request. The applicant is ~h¢ ownc~ or author'.ed representative of thc owner of the proper~y. The.petitioner and ~ ova~er of the propet'~ ~ employees of g0e Villa§e ofl~ount Pzo~'pect ;md ~ ag,.~ permission to en~.r on the propen'y~ reasonable hou~ for visual i~spcction of die subj~'t propezty. I hereby ~,~'m,d~t all information provided herein and in ~I1 rnlt~hls submitted in association wi~ d~ Sl:~lication are true and If applicam is nol prop~-vy owner:. I hereby designate ~he applicanI 100 .~uth Emerson -~ree~, MounFProspec~ www.mour~Iprospect or ~ purpose of sccking the Variation(s) de..ri'bcd in this application and g~ - ./ .... Dat~ ~ ~ ' ' ' ..... · / [ '. .... ,:5 ~ : . Phon~ ~,~'~ 1 ~.';1t21. 310 312 314 3.05 316 318 320 322 White Oak Street 314 Lincoln Street Village Boundary ................ ~ Out of Village ZBA-29-01 / 303 Douglas / Craig Residene Conditional Use - Circular Drive 92556 ~ I~'~_ .... _rr~_~ , j ~o 10110/01 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 303 DOUGLAS STREET WHEREAS, Donald Craig (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 303 Douglas Street, (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Property lndex Numbers: 08-10-114-139 08-10-114-140 A Subdivision of that part of the West % of the SW ¼ of the SE ¼ of the NW ¼ of Sec. 10, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the 3rd Principal Meridian, in Cook County, IL. and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to construct a circular driveway; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Conditional Use permit being the subject of ZBA Case No. 29-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27 day of September, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 12th day of September, 2001; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and positive recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 29-01; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mou~t Prospect. Page 2/2 303 Douglas Street SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use, as provided for in SectiOn 14.203. F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of a circular driveway, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full rome and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED andAPPROVEDthis day of ,2001. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:~GEN\files\WIN\ORDINANC\C USE, 303 Douglas, circular drive.doc · · -. '~ · · ':'..,""" ~ "" '. · '.,"'. -.'. ;.,'..'.'. i.".."', .7,:: S89'25'56"W125.25' ~'L9 ,00'/.1~ : I © illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 10, 2001 ~ PC-15-01 - KRYSTOFIAK SUBDIVISION (CREATING TWO LOTS OF RECORD) 307 WESTGATE MR. & MRS. RICHARD KRYSTOFIAK - APPLICANTS The Plan Commission Iransmits their recommendation to approve Case PC-15-01 Krystofiak Resubdivision, a request to subdivide one lot and create two lots of record, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Plan Commission heard the request at their October 3, 2001 meeting. The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed plat, found that the plat and proposed easements met Village codes and voted 44) to recommend approval of the Krystofiak Resubdivision, Case No. PC-154)1,307 Westgate. Please fo~vard this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their Oetoberl6, 2001 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter. illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION MATTHEW SLEDZ, VICE CHAIRMAN SUZANNE MAS(b, LONG RANGE PLANNER AUGUST 6, 2001 PC-15-01/KRYSTOFIAK PLAT OF RESUBDMSION/307 WESTGATE Background Petitioner: Mr. & Mrs. Richard K~stofiak 307 Westgate Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Requested Action: Plat of resubdivision creating two lots Analysis The petitioner is seeking to create two lots of record by subdiving one existing lot. The subject property is located on Westgate Road, north of Ardyce Lane. The petitioner has plans to tear down the existing home, rebuild on one lot and sell the vacant lot. The proposed plat of resubdivision seeks to create two lots of record. The plat and new lots comply with Development Code requirements and the petitioner is not seeking relief fi.om the Development Code or the Zoning Ordinance. Recommendation The proposed plat of resubdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the K~stofiak Subdivision for the property located at 307 Westgate, Mount Prospect, Case No. PC-15-01. I concur: Director of Community Development /sm H:\GEN~ LNG',PCXPC 2001~taff M~mos~PC.15-01 K~3~tofiak Lot (307 Westgat~).do~ QVOEI UJ IVI]NUi~;$ OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF 'J.'~.; MOUNT ]PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION October 03, 2001 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Vice-Chairman Matt Sledz at 7:02 p.n~ at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street; Mount Prospect; Illinois. ROLL CALL: Present: Carol Tortorello Gary Grouwinkel Matt Sledz Absent: Bill Reddy Village Staff Present: Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Others in Attendance: Richard Kmysztofiak- 307 Westgate APPROVAL OF iVIINUTES: Vice-Chairman Sledz asked for comments or changes to the July 18, 2001, August 1, 2001, August 15, 2001, and September 19, 2001 minutes. There were no changes tothe July 18, 2001 minutes. Gary Grouwinkel moved to approve the July 18, 2001 minutes and Vice-Chairman Matt Sledz seconded the motion. The July 18, 2001 minutes was approved by a voice vote of 4-0. Members agreed to defer approval of the August l, 2001 minutes because there was not a quonm~ There were no changes to the August 15, 2001 minutes. Gary Grouwinkel moved to approve the August 15, 2001 minutes and Carol Tortorello seconded the motion. The August 15, 200]minutes was approved by a voice vote of 3`0 with Edwin Janus abstaining. There were a few minor changes to the September 19, 2001 minutes. Gary Grouwinkel moved to approve the September 19, 2001 minutes as corrected and Carol Tortorelio seconded the motion. The August 19, 2001 minutes was approved by a voice vote of 2-0. Vice-Chairman Matt Sledz asked staff to present the next agenda item - Subdivision: PC-I$- 01/Krzysztofiak SUBDIVISION: PC-15`01/Krzysztofiak In this case, the petitioner is seeking to create two lots of record by tearing down their current home, build on one lot and sell the vacant lot. To date, no plans have been submitted for the new home. The applicant said that they would not choose an architect until they get approval f~om the Village. Everything complies with code and the applicant is not seeking any relief from the development code. Staff recommended approval. The plat was approved 4`0. NEW BUSINESS: Vote on Amendments to the 2001 Action Plan for the Community Developmem Block (CDBG) Program - Vice- Chairman Matt Sledz asked Ms. Roberts to review the proposed amendments to the 2001 Action Plan. Ms. Roberts reiterated that the Village intends to spend $280,000 of CDBG funds on water main replacement and street improvements on the Judith Ann Drive neighborhood. She said that the Village also intends to do streetlight improvements on Wheeling Road; Ms. Roberts said that these expenditures would allow the Village to meet HUD's timeliness requirements, and provide an opporturfity to assist the Judith Ann neighborhood with a project that was presented to the Plan Commission last year. Gary Grouwinkel suggested that the Judith Ann Association should be awarded for their dedicated efforts with the formation of the association. Members agreed.that a Special Events Nomination should be awarded to a key participant within the Judith Ann Association. Vice-Chairman Matt Sledz asked if there were any comments on the proposed amendments to the 2001 Action Plan. There were no comments. Gary C-rouwinkel moved to accept the proposed amendments to the 2001 Action Plan and Carol Tortorello seconded the motion. The amendments were approved by a voice vote of 4-0. ount Prospect Plan Commission page 2 October 3, 2001 COMMENTS AND O'rfll~R BUSINESS: Ms. Roberts distributed a memo from Michael Blue Deputy Director of Community Development, informing members of a Committee of the Whole meeting on October 9, 2001 regarding the merger of the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeal. There were discussions on the status of the Plan Commission and the progress toward merging the Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals into a combined entity. Vice-Chairman Matt $1edz stated that the merger would provide diversity and ensures clarity of vision with the implementation of Mount Prospect's long-range goals. Members agreed to attend this meeting except for Vice-Chairman Matt Sledz and Gary Grouwinkel who would not be able to attend. Edwin Sanus moved to adjourn the mee6ng and Ga~y Grouwinkcl seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned at 7:26 p.m. Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner H:\GEN~LNG~PC~C 2001Wiinutes\10-03-01 (CDBG Public Hearing).doc VWL 10110/01 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 307 NORTH WESTGATE ROAD WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Richard Krystofiak, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Subdivision for the purpose of creating two lots of record by subdividing one existing lot; WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has recommended approval of the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the subdivision of one lot of record to create two lots of record is hereby granted for the property at 307 North Westgate Road, and the Final Plat of Subdivision attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution. SECTION TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this . day of ,2001. ATTEST: Gerald Li Fadey Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Z zmo~ om~z ~0~0 0~ ~0~ ~a~< 0 1~ D~)VNIVI~O ~NV ~3N~IOI) *J. bla~Oacl tv ]~a,a ,oN, QVO~I ,.,,,,,., o,',,,o,, ,,o, o,.,,o.o.o.~o,o..,,.) a±Vg_LS a M¢-' 'N' LU ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SIYBJECT: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER NICOLE ROBERTS, NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNER OCTOBER 10, 2001 THE 2002 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (COMMUNHY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGR.OI) The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve the Village of Mount Prospect's 2002 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant program. Attached please find a spreadsheet detailing the Plan Commission's funding recommendations and background information regarding the 2002 applications. The Action Plan addresses affordable housing and service needs within Mount Prospect and is consistent with the Five Year Consolidated Plan approved by HUD in program year 2000. During the August 1, 2001 Plan Commission meeting, there was a Public Hearing to allow for citizen participation. Our department did not receive any comments or suggestions regarding the funding recommendations fi.om residents of Mount Prospect. On August 15, 2001, the Plan Commission recommended approval of the C.D.B.G. budget for Fiscal-Year 2002. Please forward this memorandum and attachment to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their October 16, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present at that meeting to answer any questions related to the matter. I concur: Community Development Director \\VH~V02XDEP~COM DEV~3EN~PLNGXCDBGheC Recommendation ea C~n Plan & CDBG Funding memo to M~e J Memo.al{x: FY 2002 PRELIMINARY BUDGET (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM) Plan Commission Requested Actual Actual Actual Actual Projects Recommendations FY-02 FY-01 FY-00 FY-99 FY-98 FY - 02 Administration B/OMP) $50,000 $20,976 $35,000 $45,000 $62,500 Low/Moderate Projects 1. Siogle Family Rehab Program 177,800 140,000 126,545 144,800 141,945 2. Public Works Improvements 50,000 a. Sidewalk Ramp Project 80,000 210,00(] 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 b. Tdp hazard elimination 60,000 0 n/a n/a c. Street Ught Project (Huntington) 80,000 235,000 90,00(] 0 n/a 33,000 3. CEDA Northwest Resource Center 25,000 25,000 20,00¢ 15,000 n/e n/a Balance 0 0 48,300 C 0 Public Service Programs 4. Summer Adventure Program 11,700 15,000 7,000 2,500 n/a n/a 5. Mentor Program 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,655 2,500 1,250 6. Camp Fire's Boxwood Programs 8,000 15,000 0 12,50¢ n/a n/a 7. Claygmund Ceramics Program 6,000 15,000 4,000 3,000 3,500 2,000 8. Resources for Community Living 2,500 5,000 2,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 9. Resource Center for EIdedy 2,000 3,50(] 2,500 1,750 2,000 2,000 10. Suburban Primary Health Care 9,000 10,00(] 9,00(] 8,500 11,00(] 12,250 :11. CEDATrensitionat Living Program 2,000 8,655 8,25(] 5,750 6,350 7,000 't2. Chtidrens Advocacy Center 3,000 3,000 t 3. Ctub Rec Ptex MP Park District 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,000 n/a n/a 14. PADS & HOPE NOW 2,50(] 15,000 0 0 nla 15. B.S.A- Learning for Life (] 3,000 3,000 2,500 n/$ n/a 10. Workforce Board ¢ 15,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a! 17. Disthct 57 - Character Counts 0 1,500 n/a n/a n/a, n/a 18. Girl Scouts 2,500 10,000 0 (] 0 0 FY 2002 Estimated COBG Allocation 368,000 FY 2002 Estimated Program Income 100,000 1. Mount Prospect's estimated CDBG allocation for FY-02 is $368~000 2. Mount Prospect's estimated Program Income for FY02 is $100,000 2. The maximum atiowed by HUD for administration is $73,600 (20%). 3. The maximum public service expeditura allowed by HUD is $55,200(15%). VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2002 Citizen Participation Citizen Participation Process: The process of developing this Action Plan began with publishing a notice in the Daily Herald on June 20, 2001 informing residents of a meeting to discuss and obtain suggestions regarding the 2002 Action Plan and projected use of Community Development Block Grant Funds. Upon receiving all applications for the 2002 Action Plan, a public hearing was held on August 1, 2001. The purpose of the hearing was to obtain input from the public, including organizations and individuals, on the housing, eomnmnity development and social needs of Mount Prospect residents. There was a meeting on August 15, 2001 where Plan Commission members voted and made funding recommendations to the Village Board for approval of the 2002 CDBG Action Plan. Public notices were also displayed in the Daily Herald, Service Organizations, and the Vilhge's Website announcing these meetings. Copies of all minutes regarding the 2002 CDBG Action Plan is included in the Plan. Stratec, v Implementation The 2002 Action Plan updates the Village of Mount Prospect's Housing and Community Development Consolidated Plan, a five year plan (2000-2005) addressing the Village's housing and community development needs. The purpose of each annual plan is to: Address the Village's five-year priorities and objectives for housing, homelessnass, community development needs, and ~ criteria. Describes what the Village proposes to do to further the five-year priorities and strategies of the Consolidated Plan. Explain the Village's method for distributing CDBG funds. Activities funded from these programs must meet the priorities identified in the five year consolidated Plan. List the resources available to the Village to further the five-year strategy. FY2002 Pro~rams The following list describes all low and moderate-income projects and public service activities that will be funded with Community Development Block Grant funds anticipated for FY 2002. /.DMINISTR2t TION HUD allows communities 20% Cap for Administration. Based on HUD's calculation, Mount Prospect's estimated allocation is $368,000. Of the $368,000, $73,600 is available for Administration. However, during program year 2002, our department anticipates spending $50,000 of CDBG funds towards administration. LOV~/MODER2tTE PROJECTS Single Family Rehab program: 0% Interest Loan & 50% Subsidy Program Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Fund'mg this low-income project directly correlates with Priority I Affordable Housing, Objective 1: Single Family Rehabilitation Program. Funding Request: $177,800 Funding Decision: $177,800 Considering factors: Due to the age of the housing stock in Mount Prospect, many residents must perform rehabilitation on their property. The cost of housing rehab is often a burden for homeowners who are low/moderate income. The Community Development Department has experienced an increase in demand for this program during this program year. Therefore, an increase in funding for FY 2002 is recommended. The Village anticipates serving 15-20 residents with housing rehab during program year 2002. The Village also uses program income received ~ previous years to fund this activity. Village of Mount Prospect FY 2002 Annual Action Plan Public Works Improvements - Sidewalk and Streetlight Improvements Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this low and moderate-income project correlates with Priority 3 Neighborhood Revitalization, Objective 2: Physical Improvements. Funding Request: Sidewalk Improvements ($210,000) & Street light Improvements ($235,000) Funding Decision: Sidewalk Improvements ($80,000) & Street light Improvements ($80,000) Considering factors: The sidewalk improvements include installation of sidewalk ramps at curbed streets to improve access and usability for handicapped residents, elimination of uneven sidewalk tripping hazards and installation of new sidewalk at locations where none currently exists. The streetlighis brighten up the roads and the neighborhood to provide an increased level of safety for traffic and pedestrians. The Public Works improvements have increased the safety and aesthetics of the community. Continued funding of this program is necessary in order to maintain the quality of service administered by the Public Works Depal'm~ent. Public Works expects to use $160,000 towards Sidewalk Ramp and Slxeeflight projects. CEDA Northwest Self-help Center - Employment Resource Center (Phase II) Relation to Five Year- Consolidated Plan - Funding this project correlates with providing adequate capacity to CEDA in order to allow them to meet Priority 4 Continuum of Care, Objective 3: Supportive Care and Services for the homeless. 2002 Goal: Proposed to add a sprinkler system at its administrative Office to meet frre code as required by VOMP. Funding Request: $25,000 for CEDA Resource Center Rehab Funding Decision: $25,000 Considering Factors: CEDA provides services for Mount Prospect homeless and near homeless. Support for this program is necessary in order to address the bomelessness issues in Mount Prospect. CDBG funds will be used to add a sprinkler system at CEDA's Administrative Office to meet frre code as required by the Village. Other Available Funding Source Location: 1300 W. Northwest Highway, Mount Prospect IL, 60056 PUBLIC SERVICE PROGRAMS Summer Adventure Program Relation to Five. Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 5: Youth Support and Growth, Objective 1: Youth Mentoring with Morals and Values Building programs. 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 125 youth 2000 Accomplishment: Served 87 Funding Request: $15,000 Funding Decision: $11,700 Considering Factors: This pro.am provides low to moderate-income youth from the south side of Mount Prospect, positive activities during the summer. The program allows youth ages 5-12 the opportunity to increase their skills in dealing with societal issues through a safe, structured, organize activities. The Northwest Community Partnership Grant, a major funding source for this program, will end this year. In addition, the program has experienced an increase in cost per youth. Therefore, an increase in funding was recommended for this program. Location: 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Mentor Program Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 5: Youth Support and Growth, Objective 1: Youth Mentoring with Morals and Values building programs. 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 150 2000 Accomplishment: 118 ckildren served in FY2000 Village of Mount Prospect FY 2002 Annual Action Plan Funding Request: $3,000 Funding Decision: $3,000 Considering Factors: This program provides social skills training, self-esteem enhancement, and positive role models for youth of Mount Prospect. The program brings together volunteers, elementary, and junior high school children from Mount Prospect in a positive one-on-one relationship. The program provides services to the low- income youth of Mount Prospect. The program anticipates serving the same amount of youth during FY2002. The program was awarded the total amount requested, Location: 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Campfire- Camp Kool Program Relation to Five- Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 5: Youth Support and Growth, Objective 2: Provide Alternate Programs. 2002 Goal: Proposed to serve 100-120 youthofMountProspect. 100% ofservicas will be provided to Mount Prospect residents 2000 Camp Fire - "New Horizons Program": 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 130 youth 2000 Accomplishment: Served 37 youth 2000 Camp Fire Boys and Girls - "Camp Kool Program": 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 120 youth 2000 Accomplishment: Served 72 youth Funding Request: $15,000 Funding Decision: $8,000 Considering Factors: This program provides recreation activities that help the youth of Mount Prospect to develop a sense of self-esteem in the process. In order to continue to fund other programs that provide similar services as Campfrre "Camp Kool' program, a reduction in funding was recommended for this program. Location: 203 N. Wabash, Suite #1518, Chicago, IL 60601 Other Available Resources: Source Funds Youth Program Registration $2,000 United Way of Mt. Prospect/Prospect Heights $6,000 Other (Camp Fire General Operating Fund) $9,320 Total $17,320 Clayground Inc. Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 5: Youth Support and Growth, Objecilve 2: Provide Alternate Programs. 2002 Goal: Proposed to serve 75 clients, and provide an unspecified number of units of services for youth of Mount Prospect 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 60 2000 Accomplishment: served 87 Funding Request: $15,000 Funding Decision: $6,000 Considering Factors: Claygroond Inc. provides ceramic art classes to low-income youth in Mount Prospect. The Center has experienced an increase in demand for services due to its new location. An increase in funding was recommended for this program. Location: 617 N. Main Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Village of Mount Prospect FY 2002 Annual Action Plan 4 Other Available Resources: None Resources for Community Living Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 1 Affordable Housing, Objective 3: Affordable Housing for Seniors/Elderly 2002 GeM: Proposed to serve 10 clients from Mount Prospect, and provide 730 traits of service. Resources for Community Living submitted their proposal but did not present it at the June 20, 2001 Plan Commission meeting. 2000 GeM: Expected to serve 7 people 2000 Accomplishment: Served 6 people Funding Request: $5,000 Funding Decision: $2,500 Considering Factors: This program provides services for the special needs population (i.e., disabled). This program was funded the same amount as in FY2001. Location: 800 Central Road, Suite 103N, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Other Available Funding Source Funds VOMP Portion Department of Human Services $101,639 $17,827 Cook County CDBG 34,000 5,700 Local Municipalities 5,000 2,500 Foundations 18,000 3,060 Others 3;000 5,100 Total $161,639 $34,187 Resource Center for the Elderly - Senior Shared Program Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding fids public service program directly correlates with Priority 1 Affordable Housing, Objective 3: Affordable Housing for Seniors/Elderly 2002 Goal'. Proposed to do assessments on 135 clients, provide units of service to 6 individuals, and respond to inquiries from 122 individuals 2000 Goal: Expected to review 600 residents 2000Accomplishment: Served- 120 clients served. 7 matches were made Funding Request: $3,500 Funding Decision: $2,000 Considering Factors: This program provides services to the senior population. The Plan Commission expressed concerns about the limited number of residents served by fids program. A slight reduction in funding was recommended for fids program. Location: 1801 Central Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Other Available Funding Source Funds VOMP Portion Local Municipalities $14,000 $0 Wheeling Township 1,800 300 Total $15,800 $300 Suburban .Primary Health Care "Access to Care" Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding fids public service program directly correlates with Priority 4 Continuum o£Care: Supportive Services 2002 Goal: Proposed to serve 399 from Mount Prospect, and providel, 237 units of services for the grant period. 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 400 2000 Accomplishment: served 421 Village of Mount Prospect FY 2002 Annual Action Plan Funding Request: $10,000 Funding Decision: $9,000 Considering Factors: This program provides health care services for low-income residents of Mount Prospect. The program reported an increase in pharmacy cost per client. However, this program has resources from other funding sources to eovex the increase in pharmacy cost. No change in funding was recommended for this program. Location: 2225 Enterprise Drive, Suite #2504, Westchester, IL 60154 Other ,~vailable Resources: Source Funds VOMP Portion Elk Grove Towaship 56,500 1,300 Wheeling Township 28,000 644 Other Township s/Municipalities 61,500 1,415 State 1,000,000 23,000 Cook County 1,500,000 34,500 Deferred Revenue - restrleted 252,153 5,800 Corporations 370,000 8,510 Other 43,000 989 Total $3,311,153 $76,158 CEDA Northwest Self-help Center - Continuum of Care - Transitional Living Program Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 4 Continuum of Care, Objective 2: Transitional Living program for the homeless 2002 Goal: Proposed to serve 16 clients from Mount Prospect. CEDA Northwest Self-help Center submitted their proposal but did not present it at the June 20, 2001 Plan Commission meeting. 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 19 individuals 2000 Accomplishment: served 12 individuals from Mount Prospect Funding Request: $8,655 Funding Decision: $2,000 Considering Factors: CEDA provides services for Mount Prospect homeless and near homeless. Based on FY2001 six months monitoring report, this program did not serve any resident from Mount Prospect. A reduction in funding was recommended for this program. Location: 1300 W. Northwest Highway, Mount Prospect IL, 60056 Other.~vailable Resources: Source Funds VOMP Portion Wheeling Township $33,000 6,930 U.W. of Mount Prospect/Prospect Heights 5,700 3,500 FEMA 14,000 4,000 Private Contributions 38,000 8,950 HUD 44,640 8,930 Total $135,340 $32,310 Children's Advocacy Center Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Youth Support & Growth. There is also a Continuum of Care component - Supportive Services 2002 Goal: Proposed to serve 36 clients from Mount Prospect Funding Request: $3,000 Funding Decision: $3,000 Considering Factors: Village of Mount Prospect FY 2002 Annual Action Plan This program provides direct services for families living in Mount Prospect who have children who have been abused or are "at risk" for incidents of child abuse. This program has experienced an increase in demand for services. An increase in funding was recommended for this program. Location: 640 Illinois Boulevard, Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60104 Other Available Funding Source Funds VOMP Portion DCFS $183,000 $10,980 IL. Criminal Justice Information Authority 53,030 3,182 United Way 46,039 2,800 Attorney General 29,474 1,768 Township 80,250 4,600 LAN 38A and 42 10,400 3,000 Foundations 15,000 900 Total $417,193 $27,230 Club Rec Plex Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding th/s public service program directly correlates with Youth Support and Growth - Alternate Program 2002 Goal: Proposed to serve 3,040 youth, and provide 52 units of services to youth of Mount Prospect 2000 Goal: Expected to serve 3,000 2000 Accomplishment: served over 3i000 Funding Request: $3,000 Funding Decision: $3,000 Considering Factors: This program provides services for youth residing in the low-income area of Mount Prospect. 80% of youth who utilize this program are residents of Mount Prospect. This program was awarded the total amount requested. Location: 420 W. Dempster Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Other Available Resources: None HOPE NOW "Homeless Program" Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 4 Continuum of Care, Objective 1: Emergency Shelter for the homeless 2002 Goal: Request for funds to support the increase in demand of clients from the Mount Prospect area. Funds will be used to support the operations of the Hope Center and services offered to Mount Prospect residents. HOPE NOW expects to serve 45 residents of Mount Prospect. Funding Request: $15,000 Funding Decision: $2,500 Considering Factors: This program provides counseling and job training to the homeless. HOPE NOW reported an increase in the amount of homeless persons in Mount Prospect. However, the program also receives a significant amount of funding fi.om other sources. Location: 1140 E. Northwest Highway, Palatine, Illinois 60067 Other Available Funding: Source Funds Park Ridge Community Women $200 ESG $13,000 Village of Schaumburg $4,425 Barrington Township $1,500 Village of Mount Prospect FY 2002 Annual Action Plan Schaumburg Townshp $1,500 Des Plaines CDBG $7,000 Valspar Corp. $1,000 Nissei Sango America $2,200 Wheeling Township $2,600 Total $33,425 All non-restricted funds received by HOPE NOW are used in a holistic manner, equally allocated to all clients. Boy Scouts of America - Learning for Life Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Youth Support and Growth - Alternate Program 2082 Goal: Proposed to serve 140 clients of Mount Prospect residents 2000 Goal: Not specified 2000 Accomplishment: served 29 youth Funding Request: $3,000 Funding Decision: $0 Considering Factors: The Learning for Life program offers a variety of activities for youth at John Jay Elementary school and Holmes Junior High, such as, field Irips to different employers in the Village, guest speakers with different occupational backgrounds, etc. There were concerns about Boy Scouts of America program due to concerns of discrimination based on sexual orientation. In addition, there were concerns about the actual amount of teachers that incorporate the programs into their curricuhim and the amount of low and moderate-income youth that benefit from the program. Staff did not receive any information from the Learning from Life program that quantifies the actual number of teachers that incorporate their program into their curriculum. Also, denying funds to the Learning for Life program would not eliminate that particular type of program given that other programs such as Girls Scouts and the Mentor program provides similar services to the youth of Mount Prospect. The recommendation was made to deny funding to the Learning for Life program. Location: 600 N. Wheeling Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Other Available Funding: Source Funds VOMP Portion Kemper $1,400 $140 Workforce Board - Scholarship Program Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Indirectly address Economic Development - based on the objective highlighted in our Con. Plan. 2002 Goal: Proposed to fund three to five scholarships for qualified Mt. Prospect residents to pursue training in targeted 1T occupations Funding Request: $15,000 Funding Decision: $0 Considering Factors: The Workforce Board did not submit a specific plan that incorporates how residents would be selected for the program or what schools they would attend. In addition, this program has a significant amount of other resources available to them. The recommendation was made to deny funding to the Workfome Board. Location: 2604 E. Dempster, Suite 502, Des Plaines, IL 60016 Other Available Funding: Source Workforce Investment Act Funds Funds VOMP Portion $5,000 $5,000 District 57 - Character Counts Program Village of Mount Prospect FY 2002 Annual Action Plan 8 Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority # 4 - Objective 1: Youth SUpport and Growth, Youth mentoring with Morals and Values Building & Priority # 3, Objective I: Neighborhood Revitalization - Empower Residents 2002 Goal: To incorporate the "Six Pillars of Character" into curriculum and community experience. The six pillars of character are trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, faimnss, caring, and citizenship. Funding Request: $1,500 Funding Decision: $0 Considering Factors: The program benef'ats both youth and adults of Mount Prospect. There were concerns about whether funding this program would violate HUD's funding policy and whether it would be a good use of CDBG funds. Therefore, additional information was necessary that would specifically tie the uses of CDBG funds to the low-moderate income areas. Melissa Sly, Program Coordinator for "Character Counts" submitted a letter that stated the benefits of the program to the low-moderate income residents of Mount Prospect. Based on an assessment of that letter, there are two events in mind: supporting crime prevention month at Randhurst with the Mount Prospect Police Department, and supporting a community cleanup in Spring 2002. The crime prevention event is an activity that benefits all residents; therefore, in order to meet HUD's guidelines, at least 51% of low and moderate- income residents must attend. Ms. Sly did not submit a specific plan on how to determine that at least 51% of low and moderate- income residents would attend. Also, Ms. Sly did not specify which low and moderate-income area would benefit from the community clean-up event. The program at its current stage does not meet HUD's requirement. Therefore, the recommendation was made to deny funding to this program. Location: School District 57 Other dvailable Resources: Not dvailable Girl Scouts - Contemporary program Relation to Five-Year Consolidated Plan: Funding this public service program directly correlates with Priority 5: Youth Support and Growth, Objective 2: Provide Alternate Programs and Objective 1: Youth Mentoring with Morals and Values building programs. 2002 Goal: Proposed to en-~ower 250 girls and female teens (ages 5-17), and provide 250 units of services to low-income girls of Mount Prospect Funding Request: Amount requested for FY 2002 = $10,000 Funding Decision: $2,500 Considering Factors: The Plan Commission expressed concerns about this program due to the termination of another program that the Girl Scouts implemented in the Boxwood area. Assurance was given that the program was terminated due to a change of focns. The previous program was offered during the summer months and the activities were not structured within regular school hours. The proposed 2002 program will be offered in a more s~uctored environment. The girls would experience girl scouting through participation in volunteer or staff-led groups, programs offered in schools or through collaboration with civic and religious organizations, special summer and spring break activities, outdoor opportunities and service projects. A recommendation was made to fund this program at a "seed" level, and their focus should be ~Ytrected to one school. Location: 650 N. Lakeview Parkway, P.O. Box 8116, Vernon Hills, IL 60061-8116 Other/~vailable Resources: Source Funds VONIP Portion Mount Prospect Jaycee's $1,000 $1,000 Mount Prospect Rotary 1,000 1,000 Total $2,000 $2,000 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Revised Minutes July 18, 2001 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Vice-Chairman Matt Sledz at 7:05 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL: Present: Matt Sledz, Vice-Chairman Gary Grouwinkel Carol Tortorello Edwin Janus Bill Reddy Village Staff Present: Others in Attendance: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Suzaane Mast, Long Range Planner Donald S. Craig, resident Donald Craig, resident lira Craig, msidant APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Vice-Chairman Sleda asked for comments or changes to the minutes. There were no changes to the minutes. Carol Tortorello moved to approve the minutes from the June 20, 2001 Plan Commission meeting and Edwin Janus seconded the moliom The minutes were approved by a voice vote of 3-0. Vice-Chairman Sledz asked staffto present the subdivisions. SUBDIVISION: PC-02-01 Maughan Subdivsion 801 Cathy Lane Petitioner: Mr. & Mrs. Robert Maughan Staff: Suganne Mast, Long Range Planner In this case, the petitioner is seeking to create one lot of record by consolidating their existing lot with a pOrtion of vacated Dresser Drive directly adjacent to the lot. The village vacated Dresser Road in 1997 when plans for a walkway were dropped. The petitioners have built an addition over the original lot line. The plat merely updates public records. Staffrecommendad approval. The plat was approved 5-0. PC-12-01 Craig Subdivision 301-3 S. Douglas Petitioner: Mr. Donald S. Craig Property Owner: Mr. Donald Craig Staff.' Snaanne Mast, Long Range Planner Here the petitioner is seeking to create one lot of record by consolidating two lots. The owner'has plans to build a home, which may go over the property line. Staffrecommended approval. The applicant described the background of this case (and the next). He noted that this was originally a four lot subdivision, but they decided to build homes for family members on the lots which called for consolidation. The plat was approved 5-0. PC-13-01 Craig 2aa Subdivision 305-7 S. Douelas Petitioner: Mr. Donald S. Craig Property Owner: Mr. Jim Craig Staff.' Suzanne Mast, Long Range Planner Mount Prospect Plan Commission July 18, 2001 page 2 The petitioner (who is the same as case PC-12-01) is seeking to create one lot of record by consolidating two lots. A home is currently under eonstmctiun on this site. Staff recommended approval. The plat was approved 5-0. NEW BUSINESS: Discussion of CommuniW Development Block (CDBG) FY 2002 Preliminary Funding Recommendations Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development reviewed HUD's funding decision policies for CDBG funds. He stated that programs must address the priorities and objectives established in the Village's Five-Year Consolidated Plan, programs must benefit Iow-moderate income residents, and groups cannot be denied funding solely on the basis that they are exclusionary. Vice-Chairman Sledz opened the public portion of the meeting at 7:35 p.m. He asked Ms. Nicole Roberts to address the next item of business - FY 2002 Preliminary Funding Recommendations. Ms. Roberts stated that staffprepared preliminary recommendations for the Plan Commission's discussion. They were based on priorities outlined in the Village's Five-Year Consolidated Plan, applications for funds, and past performance of agencies that have previously received CDBG funds. Vice-Chairman Sledz asked the Plan Commission for comments on the preliminary recommendations. There were discussions by the Plan Commission about the CDBG 2002 proposals, past performances of agencies, and the funding recommendations that were prepared by staff for the Plan Commission's discussion. Members reviewed and revised the preliminary funding recommendations that resulted in an increase in funding for several programs and a reduction for other programs. Members agreed that Clayground Inc., Summer Adventure, and Children's Advocacy Center provides invaluable services to the youth of Mount Prospect, and should be awarded additional funding. Members also agreed upon a reduction in funding for CED& Resources for Community Living, and Resource Center for the Elderly, based on a limited number in the amounts of residents served by these programs. Bill Reddy stated that the Learning for Life program should not be funded due to concerns of discrimination by Boy Scouts of America based on sexual orientation. There were discussions on whether the program should be funded. Most of the Plan Commission members agreed with Mr. Reddy's concerns regarding discrimination. The Plan Commission also agreed that denying funding to the Learning for Life program would not eliminate access for youth to that pardcular type of progiam, given that other programs such as Girls Scouts and the Mentor program provides similar services to the youth of Mount Prospect. Members agreed that although they denied funding to the Learning for Life program, the program provides a good service for youth in the Mount Prospect community. There were concerns about whether funding District 57's "Character Counts" program is au adequate use of CDBG funds and whether it would violate HUD's policy of benefiting low-moderate income residents. The Plan Commission requested further clarification from District 57 that will specifically tie the use of CDBG funds into the low-moderate income areas. Ms. Roberts agreed to contact District 57 for further clarification about the program. The Plan Commission also discussed the potential benefits of the Girl Scouts program. However, members requested further clarification of the Girl Scouts program due to termination of a program that they administered in the Boxwood area a few years ago. Ms. Roberts agreed to contact Girl Scouts for further clarification of the program. The Plan Commission recommended an increase in funding for Clayground Inc., Summer Adventure, Children's Advocac-y Center, and Girl Scouts, and a reduction in funding for CEDA, Resources for Community Living (RCL), and the Resource Center for the Elderly (RCE). The recommendation to deny funding to the Learning for Life program was approved by a voice vote of 4-1. The Plan Commission members agreed to postpone funding recommendation for the "Character Counts" program until they receive additional information that specifically tie their use of CDBG funds into the Iow-moderate income areas. The following is a list of the Plan Commission's Funding Recommendations. Mount Prospect Plan Commission July 18, 2001 page 3 Administration (voMP) $47,800 $47,800 Low/Moderate Projects t. Single Family Rehab Program 155,000 155~000 2. Public Works Improvements a. Sidewalk Ramp Project 80,000 80,000 b. Street Light Project 80,000 80,000 3. CEDA Northwest Resource Center 251000 25,000 Public Service Programs 4. Summer Adventure Program 10,00(~ 11,70(3 5. Mentor Program 3,00(~ 3,000 6. Camp Fire's Boxwood Programs 8,00(~ 8,00(~ 7. claygroond Ceramics Program 5,00{~ 6,00(~ 8. Resources for Community IJving 2,50(; 2,00(~ 9. Resource Center for Elderly 2,50(~ 2,00(~ 10. Suburban Primary Health Care 9,00(; 9,00(; 1'1. CEDATransitional LMng 4,00C 2,00(; 12. Childrens Advocacy Center 1,2001 2,500 13. Club Rec Plex MP Park District 3,000: 3,000 14. PADS & HOPE NOW 2,500! 2,50C i5. S.S.A- Learning for Life 2,500 0~ 16. Workforce Board 0 0 17. District 57 - Character Counts 1,000 1,000 18. Gid Scouts 1,000 2,500 -'"Y 2002 Estimated CDBG Allocation 368,000 -'Y 2002 Estimated Program Income 75,000 OLD BUSINESS: None COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS: There were no comments or other business. Vice-Chairman Sledz clo~ed the public session at 8:55 p.m., and moved to adjourn and Edwin Janus seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjmu'ned. Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Phnner GENXPlngIPCL2001XT- 18-0 lXPC-04-0 I\CDBG APPLICATION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Revised Minutes August 1, 2001 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Pro Tem Carol Tortorello at 7:02 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL: Present: Carol Tortorello Edwin Janus Bill Reddy Absent: Matt Sledz, Vice-Chairman Gary Grouwinkel Village Staff Present: Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner Others in Attendance: Linnea Pioro, Camp Fire,"Camp Kool" program Nancy Con'y, Summer Adventure program April Foley, Mentor program Dianne Kovack, Clayground Inc. Barb Evos, Clayground Inc. Melissa Sly, District 57 John Healy, Arrow Road David MoAxdle, Arrow Road Lindsay Hopkins, Learning for Life program Robert Walsh, Resources for Community Living Jere Teed, CEDA Northwest Center Caryn Brauweiler, Children's Advocacy program Cynthia Ash, Girl Scouts program APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Chairman Pro-Tern Carol Tortorello asked for comments or changes to thc minutes. Bill Reddy stated that the minutes were not accurate in summarizing his reasons for not funding the Boy Scouts program. Ms. Roberts asked Mr. Reddy to submit a brief sunumry of his reasons for denying funding to the Boy Scouts program, and Bill Reddy agreed to submit the information. There were no other comments or changes to the minutes. Bill Reddy moved to approve the minutes as corrected and Chairman Pro-Tern Carol Tortorello seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of 3-0. Chairman Pro-Tom Carol Tortorello asked staff to present the first ease, PCrl 1-01. SUBDMSION: PC-11-01 Garland's Lot Resubdivision 2233 South Busse Petitioner: Mr. John Healy, Arrow Road Construction Staff.- Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner The petitioner is seeking to create two lots of record by subdividing an existing lot. Arrow Road is purchasing this lot from a neighboring property owner. The petitioner will be expanding an existing parking lot to Lot 1. Lot 2 will remain undeveloped at this time. Staffrecommended approval. The plat was approved 3-0. Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 2 August 1, 2001 NEW BUSINESS: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) FY 2002 Public Hearing: Ms. Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner stated that the purpose ~f this meeting is to give all interested parties the opportunity to attend the meeting and discuss the funding recommendations. She said that due to conflicting schedules, not all Plan Commission members could attend this meeting. Therefore, in order to allow each member the opportunity to vote on the funding recommendations, members agreed to hold the public portion of the meeting tonight, but postpone the vote on funding recommendations until the August 15, 2001 Plan Commission meeting. Chairman Pro-Tern Carol Tortorello asked Ms. Roberts to give an update on District 57 "Character Counts" program. Ms. Roberts stated that Melissa Sly, Program Coordinator of the "Character Counts" submitted a letter with additional information on how CDBG funds would benefit the low and moderate- income residents of Mount Prospect. Ms. Roberts said that based on an assessment of the letter, the Character CoUnts program has two events in mind: supporting crime preventiOn month at Randhurst with the Mount Prospect Police Department, and supporting a community cleanup in Spring 2002. She said that the crime prevention event is an eligible activity that benefits all residents; however, in order to meet HLrD's guidelines, at least 51% of low-income residents must attend the event. Ms. Roberts said that the letter did not specify how they would determine that at least 51% of low and moderate-income residents would attend the event. Also, although the community cleanup would meet HUD's guidelines of benefiting low and moderate-income residents, the letter did not specify which low and moderate-income area would benefit from the event. Therefore, the recommendation was made to deny funding to the "Character Counts" program. The Plan Commission agreed that there is an extra $1,000 to allocate, but postpor~ed how to allocate the extra funds until the August 15, 2001 Plan Commission meeting. Chairman Pro*Tem Carol Tortorel!o opened the Public Hearing at 7:20 pm., and asked applicants applying for CDBG funds to respond to the funding recommendations in the order that they signed in. Linnea Pioro of the Camp Fire "Camp Kool" program thanked the Plan Commission for their continued support of the program. However, she said that their program uses CDBG funds to pay for a portion of their youth counselors' salaries; therefore, the reduction in funding would reduce the number of counselors available to serve the youth. Edwin Janus stated that the decision to reduce their funding was based on the limited number of youth served by the program. He said that during FY2000, records showed that the program served 37 out of 130 youth they proposed to serve from Mount Prospect. Linnea Pioro stated that the program actually served 72 youth. She agreed to submit information showing the total number of youth that benefited from the program during program year 2000. Nancy Cony and April Foley expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's continued support of the Summer Adventure and Mentor program. They spoke about the programs that were undertaken this year, past and future performances, and their funding needs. Nancy Cony stated that the increase in funding would allow her to continue to provide quality services to the youth of Mount Prospect. Dianne Kovack of Clayground Inc., expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's continued support of her arts program. She said that the Center has experience an increase in demand for services due to its new location; therefore, the additional funding would allow her to respond to the increase in demand. Ed Janus voiced concerns about the limited number of residents served by the program. He said that during FY 2000, records showed that the program served 25 out of 60 youth from Mount Prospect. Ms. Kovack said that the program actually served 87 youth from Mount Prospect. She agreed to submit information showing the total number of youth that benefited from the program during program year 2000. Lindsay Hopkins of Boy Scouts of America, Learning for Life program was concerned that the program was not funded. She spoke about the benefits of the program to the Iow and moderate-income youth of Mount Prospect Plan Commission August 1, 2001 page 3 Mount Prospect. She also stated that, although they receive funding fi.om Boy Scouts of America, the Learning for Life program has a separate Board of Directors fi.om Boy Scouts of America. In addition, she said that the Learning for Life program select the schools and businesses for its programs, but the schools and businesses selects the adults who work with the youth. Bill Reddy st,/ted that the decision to deny funding to the Learning for Life program was based on the fact that Boy Scouts of America discriminates based on sexual orientation. Bill Reddy stated that the Learning for Life program is the same agency as Boy Scouts of America and the contractual agreement is between the Village and Suburban Northwest Council and not the Learning for Life program. Edwin Janus voiced support of-the Learning for Life program. Robert Walsh of the Resources for Community Living spoke about the programs that were undertaken this year, past and future performances, and their funding needs. He made an appeal to maintain the current level of funding on the basis that the reduction would prevent the agency fi.om expanding its program. Edwin Janus stated that the decision to reduce funding was based on the limited number of residents served during program year 2000. He said that during FY 2000, records showed that the program served 4 out of 7 residents fi.om Mount Prospect. Mr. Walsh stated that the program actually served 6 residents of Mount Prospect. He agreed to submit information showing the total number of residents that benefited fi.om the program during program year 2000. Jere Teed of CEDA Northwest Self-Help Center, "Transitional Living" program spoke about the benefits of the program to the Mount Prospect community, He expressed concerns about their reduction in funding and inquired about the funding criteria. Ms. Roberts stated that the decision to reduce funding was based on the limited number of residents served by the program. Ms. Roberts also said that based on the 2001 six month monitoring site visit, the program did not place any residents fi.om Mount Prospect. Carolyn Brauweiler of the Children's Advocacy Center expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's continued support of the program. She spoke about the benefits of the program to the community and the need for the additional funding. Cynthia Ash of Gift Scouts expressed appreciation for the Plan Commission's support of the program. She spoke about the purpose of the program and its benefits to the Mount Prospect community. The Plan Commission reiterated that the program would be given "seed money" and continued funding would be based on the performance of the agency. COMMENTS AND OTI~R BUSINESS: There were discussions on how to determine what specific items agencies purchase using CDBG funds. Ms. Roberts stated that programs such as VOMP Summer Adventure & Mentor submit receipts for items purchased using CDBG funds. The Plan Commission requested census tract information for Boxwood and Judith Ann area. Chairman Pro-Tern Carol Tortorello closed the public session at 8:15 p.m., Edwin Janus moved to adjourn and Bill Reddy seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Suzanne Mas6, Long Range Planner H:\GEN~PLNG~PC~PC 2001kMinutes~8-01-01 (CDBG Public Hearing).doc MINUTES OF TH]g REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Revised Minutes August 15, 2001 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Vice-Chairman Matt Sledz at 7:05 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL: Present: Carol Tortorello Bill Reddy Matt Sledz, Vice-Chairman Gary Grouwinkel Absent: Edwin Janus Village Staff Present: Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Others in Attendance: Nancy Corry, Summer Adventure Program Dianne Kovack, Clayground Inc. Dave Steele Stephen Luzarder APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Vice-Chairman Sledz deferred approval of the minutes of the July 18, 2001 meeting because there was not a quorum to vote on the minutes. Vice-Chairman Sledz asked for changes or comments to the August 1, 2001 minutes. Carol Tortorello and Nicole Roberts made minor changes to the minutes. Members agreed to defer approval of the August 1, 2001 minutes until the September 5, 2001 Plan Commission meeting. SUBDIVISION: None NEW BUSINESS: Vote on Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)-FY 2002: Vice-Chairman Sledz asked Ms. Roberts to review the revisions that were made to the funding recommendations from the previous Plan Commission meetings. Ms. Roberts stated that there is $1,000 of unallocated funds for Public Service programs. Bill Reddy added that the extra $1,000 came from the decision to deny funding to District 57 because the program did not meet HUD's guidelines to receive funding. Ms. Roberts said that District 57 submitted a letter to clarify how CDBG funds would be used in low and moderate-income areas of Mount Prospect. However, the letter did not specify how they would document that over 51% of residents who attend the crime prevention event would meet low and moderate-income requirements and that the program did not identify a specific low and moderate income area for the community clean-up activity. Ms. Roberts said that during the August 1, 2001 Plan Commission meeting representatives from Campfire, Clayground, and Resources for Community Living were concerned about the Plan Commission's accuracy regarding the number of residents that they served during Program Year 2000. She said that sub-recipients had re-submitted documentation regarding the actual number of residents served by these programs. Gary Grouwinkel added that his site visi~ to Campfire ,Camp Kool" program Mount Prospect Plan Commission August 15, 2001 page 2 confirmed that the program served over 74 youth. There were also discussions regarding Clayground's activities, the number of youth served, unit of service, and the possibility of transporting youth from Boxwood to the Center's new location. Dianne Kovack, President of Clayground stated that they have experienced an increase in demand for services due to their new location. She also appealed to maintain the $6,000 that was recommended for Clayground for program year 2002. Carol Tortorello inquired about possible safeguards to prevent inaccuracy in sub-recipients' reporting on the total amount of youth served. She said that sub-recipients should work on keeping better records on the number of participants for each program or unit of services. David Steele from Leaming for Life voiced concerns regarding the Plan Commission's decision to deny funding to their program. Mr. Steele said that the Learning for Life (LFL) program is a subsidiary of Boy Scouts of America (BSA) and CDBG funds will be used only for the LFL program. He said that the program teaches citizenship, ethics, career development, etc., through materials provided by LFL and guest speakers to students at John Jay Elementary and Holmes Junior High. Mr. Steele also submitted a letter of support from the Principal at John Jay Elementary school. Bill Reddy reiterated his concerns regarding the BSA discriminatory policy based on sexual orientation, that LFL substantive beliefs do not differ from BSA, and that other municipalities have identified LFL philosophy as not differing from BSA. Bill Reddy added that BSA is the same as LFL and the decision to deny LFL funding will not make a financial impact on the BSA, but will send a message to the BSA. Gary Grouwinkel said that the programs are well received by schools and questioned how LFL can discriminate if programs are presented to the entire class. There was discussion regarding the level at which these programs are being implemented in the classroom and the number of low and moderate-income youths served. Mr. Steele said that their program would target schools that are located in the low and moderate-income areas. Gary Crrouwinkel said that there is not enough information regarding the actual number of teachers that implement LFL programs in their classrooms to confirm that CDBG funds are being used as intended and it is too late in the fiscal year to allow for further clarification. There was further discussion regarding the Gift Scouts program. Gary Grouwinkel said that Gift Scouts would provide programs to only one school. Mr. Reddy added that 2003 funding for this program would be based on 2002 performance. Plan Commission members agreed that the Girl Scouts program would be funded on a "seed basis" and that future funding will be based on FY 2002 performance. Vice-Chairman Sledz reviewed the funding recommendations. The Plan Commission discussed how to distribute the unallocated $1,000 and agreed to allocate $500 each to the Children's Advocacy Center and Resource for Community Living. Vice-Chairman Sledz asked if there were any additional changes to the funding recommendations. Since there were no other changes, Gary G-rouwinkel moved to adopt the revised August 15, 2001 recommendations and Carol Tortorello seconded the motion. The funding recommendations were approved by a vote of 4-0. COMMENTS AND OTItER BUSINESS: None Bill Reddy moved to adjourn the meeting and Gary Grouwinkel seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Judy Connolly, Senior Planner H:\GENXPLNO~C~PC 2001~vlinuteskS-15-01 (CDBG Public Hearing).doe MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION September 19, 2001 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Pro Tem Carol Tonorello at 7:09 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL: Present: Carol Tortorello Ga~ Grouwinkel Absent: Bill Reddy Edwin Janus Mat~ Sledz Village Staff Present: Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner Others in Attendance: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Chairman Pm Tem Carol Tortorello deferred approval of the minutes of the July 18, 2001, August 1, 2001, and August 15, 2001 meetings because there was not a quorum to vote on the minutes. Members agreed to defer approval oftha minutes until October 3, 2001 Plan Comrrfission meeting. SUBDIVISION: None NEW BUSINESS: Public Hearing for the Amendment to the 2001 Action Plan for the CommuniW Development Block (CDBG) Program - Chairman Pm Tern Carol Tortorello asked Ms. Roberts to review the proposed amendments to the 2001 Action Plan. Ms. Roberts said that the Village intends to spend $280,000 of CDBG funds on water main replacement and street improvements on the Judith Ann Drive neighborhood. She said that the Village also intends to do streetlight improvements on Wheeling Road. Ms. Roberts said that the streetlight improvements were initially budgeted for Huntington; however, due to right of way issues on Huntington, the project will be done on Wheeling Road instead. She said that the estimated cost for street improvements on Wheeling Road is the same as Huntington; therefore, the streetlight improvements project would not increase the budget for 2001. Ms. Roberts also added that the Village intends to do parking improvements on Judith Ann Drive. However, Ms. Roberts said that in order to do the parking improvements, HUD requires that the parking improvements should be done as part of a substantial improvement that includes rehabilitation to the actual structure of the buildings, i.e., parking improvements, roofing, etc. Ms. Robe,s stated that these expenditures would allow the Village to meet I-ILrD's timeliness requirements, and provide an opportmfity to assist the Judith Ann neighborhood with a project that was presented to the Plan Commission last year. She said that the purpose of the Public Hearing is to obtain suggestions and comments from citizens on these amendments. Chairman Pro Tom Carol Tortorello opened the Public Hearing at 7:18 p.m., and asked if there were any comments on the proposed amendments for the 2001 Action Plan. There were no comments. Chairman Pro Tern Carol Tortorello deferred approval of the amendments because there was not a quorum to vote. COMMENTS AND OTHERBUSINESS: None The Public Hearing was closed at 7:22 p.m. and no action was taken. Gary Grouwinkel moved to adjourn the meeting and Chairman Pro Tern Carol Tortorello seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned at 7:26 p.m. Nicole Roberts, Neighborhood Planner nr/wje vwl RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2002 ACTION PLAN INCLUDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM WI-W. REAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has prepared a Five-year Consolidated Plan, which includes a Action Plan as well as an application for a Community Development Block Grant; and WHF. REAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is entering its twenty-fourth year as an entitlement community under the federal Community Development Block Grant Program; and WI~.REAS, in the past twenty three years the Village has used its Community Development Block Grant entitlement to implement various projects to address the community development and housing needs of low and moderate-income and elderly residents, to reduce and prevent the occurrence of deterioration in the Village, to increase accessibility for the handicapped, and to address other community needs in conformance with the objectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WkI~REAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has allocated $468,000 for fiscal year 2002 from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees has determined that the Action Plan and the use of CDBG funds can be of benefit in providing for resident's health, safety and welfare and in meeting the community and housing needs of its citizens: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby approve the attached Action Plan, which includes an allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds in the amount of $468,000 Youth Service Programs Suburban Primary Health Care Elderly/Community Services Program Transitional Living Program and Resource Center Public Streetlight Improvements Homeless Shelter Single Family Rehabilitation Loan Program Neighborhood Sidewalk Ramp ADA Program General Administration $37,200 $9,000 $4,500 $27,000 $80,000 $2,500 $177,800 $80,000 $50,000 FY 2002 CDBG FUNDS $468:000 CDBG Action Plan Page 2/2 SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorizes the Village Manger to prepare and forward to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development a submission of Mount Prospect's 2002 Action Plan in accordance with federal guidelines. This Plan includes an application for FY 2002 federal community Development Block Grant funds. SECTION THREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: PASSED ANDAPPROVEDthis __ day of ,2001. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk LAW OFFICES KLEIN, THORPE AND JENKINS, LTD. Suite 1660 20 North Wacker Drive ChicaD~, Illinois 60606-2903 Te~phene (312) 984-6400 Facsimile (312) 984-6444 (312) 606-7077 Orland Park Office 15010 S. Ravlnla Avenue Suite 17 (312) 984-6446 Riada Y. Allison Thomas M. Melody Lance C. Malina ffunone M. Boutet David J. Fish Kathleen T. Henn 3ohn R. Wik~r George A. Wagner Of Counsel TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM Mr. Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager Village of Mount Prospect Everette M. Hill, Jr. October 12, 2001 Vehicle Licensing Amendments I am attaching to this Memo an ordinance which addresses three issues that have arisen with respect to the licensing of vehicles under our current Village Code. ISSUE #1 Our current ordinance effectively defines First and Second Division twice, with a perceived discrepancy in the two definitions. This potential discrepancy has caused some problems for the Finance Department when it comes to the issuance of Village stickers for Class B vehicles. Certain residents have argued that even though they have Class B plates, our definition of Second Division vehicles does not cover them. Because we define First and Second Division vehicles within the licensing provisions, the definition in 17.101 is superfluous and should be deleted. Eliminating it removes the potential discrepancy. The attached ordinance accomPlishes the deletion. ISSUE #2 Our current Code provision with respect to Village vehicle stickers has been somewhat difficult to enforce. An ambiguity in the language created a rather large loophole for,claims 'that even though a vehicle was registered to a Mount Prospect address, it was operated primarily in another jurisdiction and therefore did not require the display of a Mount ProsPect sticker. Mr. Michael E. Janonis October 12, 2001 Page 2 As you might imagine, it becomes very difficult for judges and even our own police officers to decide where to draw the line on when a vehicle is used primarily in Mount Prospect. The proposed ordinance makes it very clear that if a vehicle is registered to a Mount Prospect address, that vehicle may be exempted from the requirement of displaying a Mount Prospect vehicle sticker only if it displays a sticker from another jurisdiction. We are well aware that not all other jurisdictions have vehicle stickers. In those instances, it is not unfair or inappropriate to require a Mount Prospect registered vehicle to have a Mount Prospect sticker even though the vehicle doesn't spend much time in Mount Prospect. The point is that in order to make the vehicle sticker requirement enforceable, a "bright line" standard is needed. ISSUE #3 This ordinance also includes the requested exemption language for antique vehicles that are registered as such with the Secretary of State. If you have any questions, please contact me. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: Article I, "General Provisions", Section 17.101, entitled "Definitions", of Chapter 17 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be amended by deleting paragraph C of Section 17.101 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following new paragraph C which shall be and read as follows: C. Motor Vehicle: Every vehicle which is self-propelled and not operated upon rails. SECTION 2: Article I, "General Provisions", Section 17.102, entitled "Licenses Required", of Chapter 17 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be amended by deleting Section 17.102 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following new Section 17.102 which shall be and read as follows: 17.t02: LICENSES REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS. Every motor vehicle, motor driven cycle, motor bicycle and/or trailer, semitrailer or other vehicle as set forth in this Ordinance, which is (1) owned or operated by a person who resides within the Village; or (2) which is owned by a company, firm or corporation which has a place of business located within the Village; or (3) registered with the State to an address located within the Village, shall have displayed a current, properly purchased Mount Prospect vehicle license. There shall be only two exceptions to this license requirement: (1) Vehicles that (a) are kept and operated primarily in another municipal jurisdiction; and (b) display a current and valid license from that municipal jurisdiction; and (2) Vehicles displaying a currently valid antique license plate issued by the Illinois Secretary of State. SECTION 3: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ,2001. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Village President Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS PROJECT ENGINEER OCTOBER 11, 2001 SUBJECT: SEPTEMBER SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - REQUEST FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS AROUND LIONS PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to approve new parking restrictions on Maple Street, Elm Street, School Street and Council Trail; amend current parking restrictions on School Street; and amend the current timeframe for the one-way designation on School Street. School attendance is at an all-time high (around 650 students) this year. Mobile classrooms were added this summer to address the increase in attendance. More and more students are being driven to school by parents. Also, the school has closed the long-term parking lot off of Council Trail to parents for drop-off and pick-up. All of these factors have created congestion along the streets south of Council Trail. In addition to addressing this concern, the school has also expressed a need for additional short-term parking as the short-term parking lot off of School Street often times is filled during the day. Staff observed a large amount of vehicles and pedestrian traffic throughout the day, especially during the drop-off and pick-up times. At the time school lets out, Staff observed over 100 vehicles parked on Village streets around the school. Gridlock was often observed during drop-off and pick-up times since two-way traffic cannot be maintained when vehicles are parked on both sides of the street. Parents were observed turning around in driveways and blocking driveways. Students were observed walking between parked cars and crossing the street not at a crosswalk. Restricting parking to one side of the street should ease congestion, improve traffic movement and improve pedestrian safety. Modifying the current parking restrictions along the west side of School Street (8am-4pm) north of Council Trail should benefit both the school and residents. The school has expressed a need for additional shod-term parking adjacent to the school. -By restricting parking during the peak hours only (8:30-9:30am & 3-4pm), drop-off and pick-up spaces are not lost and shod-term parking during the day is provided. Parking is also currently not allowed on the east side of the street. By relaxing the parking restrictions on the west side of the street, residents can also now take advantage of the street parking during the day. The current timeframe for the one-way designation on School Street (8-9:30am & 2:30-4pm) seems to be overly restrictive in Staff's opinion. Slightly modifying the times will not have a negative affect on drop-off and pick-up. The new times (8:30-9:30am & (3-4pm) will also be . consistent with the new parking restrictions along the west side of School Street::c::~.. '.¥:::-: ::-: :. :-. :.'.. -: :.:::: age two... October Safety Commission Me,ting OcR)bet 11,2001 61 surveys were distributed to those residents that live adjacent to the proposed parking restrictions. 29 surveys were returned to the Village. 8 surveys opposed the proposed parking restrictions. The remaining surveys either supported the additional parking restrictions or provided other suggestions. Difficulty accessing driveways, traffic congestion and a need to improve children safety were a few comments. The Safety Commission discussed this issue at their October 8~ meeting. I provided a presentation on this issue and answered questions from the Safety Coot, mission members. Four parents that sit on the Traffic Safety Committee with the school ~=re present to share their thoughts. Two residents were also present and given the opportunity to share their opinions. By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to: approve No Stopping Standing Parking 8am - 4pm School Days signs along the: east side of Maple Street between Moehling Drive and Berkshire Lane east side of Elm Street between Council Trail and Berkshire Lane east side of School Street between Council Trail and Berkshire Lane approve, No Parking (Drop-off~ Pick-up Zone) 8am - 4pm ~=hooi Days signs along the north side of Council Trail between Elm Street and School Street repeal No Parking (Drop-off / Pick-up Zone) 8am - 4pm School Days signs along the west side of School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail approve No Parking (Drop-off / Pick-up Zone) 8:30-9:30am & 3-4pm School Days signs along the west side of School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail repeal the current timeframe of 8am-4pm school days for the one-way southbound designation along School Street between Shabeoee Trail and Council Trail approve the timeframe of 8:30-9:30am and 3-4pm school days for the one- way southbound designation along School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail Please include this item on the October 16th Village Board Meeting A~'~da. Based on the discussion at the Safety Commission meeting, it doesn't appear that any of the above recommendations are controversial; therefore, it would be acceptab4e to Staff. for the Village Board of Trustees to make a single motion on this issue. Encio~cl are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map f~ your reference. cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:~les~n gineer\h'a fflcXsa feeomm~rec s&min~oetO 1 ~e.d~: EXISTING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS ~O~ ~ pARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STOP SIGN DO NOT ENTER 8-9:30AM & 2:S0-4PM SCHOOL DAYS RIGHT TURN ONLY ON SCHOOL DAYS NO PARKING ANY TIME 2HR PARKING 7AM-6PM NO STOPPING STANDING PARIGNG 8AM-4P~I SCHOOL DAYS NO PARKING DROP-OFF / PICK-UP ZONE 8AM-4PM SCHOOL DAYS PROPOSED TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AROUND LIONS PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DO NOT ENTER 8:30-9:30AM & 3-4PM SCHOOL DAYS NO PARI~NG DROP-OFF / PICK-UP ZONE 8:30-9:30A~ & 3-4PM SCHOOL DAYS NO PARKING DROP-OFF / PICK-UP ZONE 8AM-4PM SCHOOL DAYS -.- NO STOPPING STANDING PARE~G 8AM-4PM SCHOOL DAYS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2009 of "SCHEDULE IX- PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS" of Chap~er 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: "Name of Street Side of Street School St. West Description Btw. Council Tr. and ShaBonee Tr. (loading zone)." SECTION TWO: That Section 18.2003 of "SCHEDULE III - ONE-WAY STREETS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the following: "Name of Street Direction of Traffic Movement School St. Northbound Description Btw. ShaBonee Tr. and Coundl Tr. (school days 8 AM - 4 PM)." SECTION THREE: That Section 18.2005 of "SCHEDULE V - NO STOPPING, STANDING, OR PARKING" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the following: Side Between "Name of Street of Street Hours Of Maple St. East School days 8 AM -4 PM Elm St. East School days 8AM-4PM School Street East School days 8AM-4 PM Description Btw. Moehling Driv~and Berkshire Lane Btw. Council Trail and Berkshire Lane Btw. Council Trail and Berkshire Lane." SECTION FOUR,: That Section 18.2003 of"SCHEDULE III- ONE-WAY STREETS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the following: Direction of "Name of Street Traffic Movement Description School St. Southbound Btw. ShaBonee Tr. and Council Tr. (school days 8:30 AM - 9:30 AM and 3 PM - 4 PM)." Page 2/2 Amend Ch. 18, Lions Park School SECTION FIVE: That Section 18.2009 of"SCHEDULE IX- PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by including the following text: "or as designated below" .:-'" '" so that hereafter said paragraph shall be and read as follows: "18.2009: SCHEDULE iX - PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS: In accordance with section 18.1318 of this chapter, and when signs are erected giving notice thereef, no person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle between the hours of eight o'clock (8:00) A.M. and four o'clock (4:00) P.M., or as designated below, on school days within the distdct or upon any of the streets or parts of streets as follows:" SECTION SIX: That Section 18.2009 of"SCHEDULE IX- PARKING DURING SCHO(~L HOURS" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the following: "Name Side of Street of Street Council Tr. North Description Btw. Elm St. and School St. (drop-off/pick-up zone) School St. West Btw. Council Tr. and ShaBonee Tr. 8:30 AM to 9:30 AM and 3 PMto4PM (drop-off/pick-up zone)." SECTION SEVEN: approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001. That this Ordinance shalt be in full force and effect from and after its passage, ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk H:\GEN/fi[e$\WIN/O RDINANC\CH ~ 8,LionsParkSchool parking.doc Gerald L. Farley, Village President Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS PROJECT ENGINEER OCTOBER 11. 2001 SUBJECT: OCTOBER SAFETY COMMISSION - REVIEW OF PARKING RESTRICTIONS AROUND PROSPECT HIGH'SCHOOL The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to not enact any further parking restrictions around Prospect High School at this time. As you recall, the Village Board of Trustees at their September 18th meeting passed an ordinance that restricted parking on four Village Streets near Prospect High School. The Safety Commission and Village Board of Trustees indicated a desire for Staff to monitor the effect of the new parking restrictions on the streets in question and the rest of the neighborhood. The Safety Commission asked that this issue be brought back before them in October for further discussion. Before the recent parking restrictions were approved, Staff observed 30-45 vehicles parked along both sides of the 500 to 700 blocks of Fairview Avenue during the school day. In addition to Fairview Avenue, Staff observed another 20 student vehicles parked on Village streets around the school. Since enacting the new parking restrictions, student parking has not been seen on the affected streets. Staff also has observed only about 20 vehicles parked on various Village streets that do not currently have parking restrictions. - - Of these 20 student vehicles, about half have been observed to be parked on the 400 block of Forest Avenue. The remaining vehicles are parking on the 400 blocks of Oak Avenue, MacAr[hur Boulevard, Dale Avenue and Fairview Avenue. Staff has received some complaints from these residents but believes that the inconvenience should be resolved once the school opens up the additional 140 parking spaces at the end of October. Staff is concerned that by extending parking restrictions further south, student parking may simply shift to streets south of Gregory Street. Student parking would then encroach Fairview Elementary School traffic. Staff spent a significant amount of time earlier this year correcting traffic problems associated with the school and does not want to create new problems. age two... October Safety Commission Meeting October 11,2001 The Safety Commission discussed this issue at their October 8th meeting. I provided a presentation on this issue and answered questions from the Safety Commission members. There was no one in attendance that wished to speak on this issue. By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to not ~nact' any further parking restrictions at this time. However, the Safety Commission requests Staff to continue to monitor the parking situation around the school. Should the Current situation worsen even after the additional parking spaces become available, Staff is to restudy this issue including surveying residents and bringthe issue back to the Safety Commission. Please include this item on the October 16th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map for your reference. cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe Matthew P. Lawrie x:\files\engineer\traffi&safecommXrecs&min\octO 1 rec.doc PARKING MAP ~ AREA WHERE STUDENTS ARE CURRENTLY PARKING'-- LA W OFFICES KLEIN, THORPE AND JENKINS, LTD. Suite 1660 20 North Wacl~r Drive Chical~, Illinois 60606-2903 Telcphc~le (312) 984-6400 Facsimile (312) 984-6444 (312) 606-7077 Orland Park Oil~ce 15010 S. Ravhda Avenue Suite 17 (312) 984~46 Rinda Y. Allison Thorr~s M. Melody Lance C. Malim Simon~ M. Boutet David J. Fish TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager Village of Mount Prospect Everette M. Hill, Jr. October 12, 2001 Planning & Zoning Commission Certain questions were raised at the October 9, 2001 Committee of the W-hole meeting with regard to quorums and voting requirements. This memo is an attempt to cladfy those issues. First of all, it should be stressed that the proposed ordinance contains no policy changes in the quorum or voting requirements for matters that will come before the new Commission. The proposed Ordinance does clarifythat four (4) concurring votes are required to reverse any decision of the Director of Community Development or to grant or recommend the granting of any variation. Further, although a meeting could be held with as few as three members (thus empowering a theoretical voting majority of 2); the four concurring vote requirement would never permit any action to be taken or any recommendation to be made to.the. V age Board on a variation or on an appeal of a decision of the Director with fewer than four affirmative votes. . ~. The quorum requirement for most meetings of the Planning & Zoning Commission is a majority of those holding office. Thus, if there is a full complement-of members, the attendance of four members will be required to constitute a quorum. ~.the.r.e. is or~ seat for which no current appointment has been made, the quorum will still be four. If two seats are without appointment, then the qubrum requirement would be three, thus triggenng the above- noted theoretical majority vote of two. ~ Mr. Michael E. Janonis October 12, 2001 Page 2 However, the voting requirement for a positive recommendation or action on variations and appeals remains at four members, irrespective of the quorum requirement. The four-member voting requirement tends to make the quorum issue moot as to these issues. As noted at the October 9th meeting, the proposed ordinance also permits the Commission to adopt a rule allowing the Commission to create committees of two members to conduct public hearings. For purposes of clarification, I have added cautionary language that such a committee could not conduct a hearing on any matter that requires action by at least three members. I would see the lesser quorum or the subcommittee of two applying when a plat is to be examined which permits no exercise of discretion, but nonetheless requires a public hearing. I am also providing an alternative membership section which provides for the appointment of a Associate Member. The Associate Member would have a five year appointment and would be eligible to attend all meetings, deliberate and comment on all issues and vote anytime a regular member was absent. We settled on the "Associate Member" approach rather than an "altemate member" approach because of the importance of the entire membership being a part of the ongoing deliberative dynamic of the Commission. We also determined that since less than half of the meetings are attended by the full membership, the Associate Member would have the opportunity to vote on many occasions. The staff believes that this approach met the objective of having an "alternative member" with the added benefit of allowing this member to feel that he or she is a permanent and active 3art of the Commission. If you have any questions, please contact me. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: That Article V "Zoning Board of Appeals" of Chapter 5 shall be deleted in its entirety and a new Article V, entitled "Planning & Zoning Commission" of Chapter 5 shall be inserted in lieu thereof and shall be and read as follows: SECTION: 5.50t: 5.502: 5.503: 5.504: ARTICLE V PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Creation and Membership Organization Public Hearings and Meetings Jurisdiction 5.501: CREATION AND MEMBERSHIP: A Planning & Zoning Commission is hereby created. Regular Members. The Planning & Zoning Commission shall consist of six (6) regular members as appointed by the Village President with the consent of the Board of Trustees of the Village. Chair. In addition to the six (6) regular members, the Village President shall appoint, with the consent of the Trustees, a chair who shall be deliberative and voting member of the Planning & Zoning Cbmmission. Term. Each member of the Planning & Zoning Commission, including the chair and the associate member shall serve for a term of five (5) years or until his or her successor has been duly appointed and qualified. The chair shall serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms as chair. The initial appointment may be made for shorter terms. These terms shall be staggered to assure that no more than three (3) member's terms expire in the same year. The Village President with the advice and consent of the Village Board may make the initial appointment as the President may deem appropriate. The initial appointments may, but shall not be required to be made from the existing Zoning Board of Appeals or Plan Commission membership. Removal. Each member of the Planning & Zoning Commission, including the chair, shall serve at the pleasure of the Village President and Board of Trustees of the Village. Vacancy. Vacancies on the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be filled for the unexpired term of the member or the chair whose seat has become vacant by appointment by the Village President with the consent of the Board of Trustees of the Village. (Ord. 5126, 7-18-2000) 5.502: ORGANIZATION: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village may provide by resolution for the compensation of the members and chair of the Planning & Zoning Commission. The Planning & Zoning Commission shall select from its membership a vice chair. 1. The vice chair shall serve as acting chairperson whenever the chair is absent from meetings and public hearings. The Planning & Zoning Commission shall adopt rules for the conduct of its hearings and meetings, which rules shall not conflict with this Article. Such rules may include the creation of a committee authorized to conduct the appropriate public hearings at any time two (2) or more members of the Planning & Zoning Commission are present. Such a committee may not conduct hearings or render a decision in any matter which requires an affirmative vote of three or more members. 2 __Associate Member. The Village President, with the consent of the Trustees, shall appoint one associate member, who shall be a deliberative member in all instances and a voting member when one or more regular members or the chair is absent. Term. Each member of the Planning & Zoning Commission, including the chair and the associate member shall serve for a term of five (5) years or until his or her successor has been duly appointed and qualified. The chair shall serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms as chair. The initial appointment may be made for shorter terms. These terms shall be staggered to assure that no more than three (3) member's terms expire in the same year. The Village President with the advice and consent of the Village Board may make the initial appointment as the President may deem appropriate. The initial appointments may, but shall not be required to be made from the existing Zoning Board of Appeals or Plan Commission membership. Removal. Each member of the Planning & Zoning Commission, including 'the chair, shall serve at the pleasure of the Village President and Board of Trustees of the Village. Vacancy. Vacancies on the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be filled for the unexpired term of the member or the chair whose seat has become vacant by appointment by the Village President with the consent of the Board of Trustees of the Village. (Ord. 5126, 7-18-2000) 5~502: ORGANIZATION: Ao The President and Board of Trustees of the Village may provide by resolution for the compensation of the members and chair of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Bo The Planning & Zoning Commission shall select from its membership a vice chair. The vice chair shall serve as acting chairperson whenever the chair is absent from meetings and public hearings. The Planning & Zoning Commission shall adopt rules for the conduct of-its hearings and meetings, which rules shall not conflict with this Article. Such rules may include the creation of a committee authorized to conduct the apprepdate public hearings at any time'two (2). or more members of the Planning & Zoning Commission are present. Such a committee may not conduct hearings or render a decision in any matter which requires an affirmative vote of three or more members. - Further, if such a rule is not created, a majority of the currently filled positions shall constitute a quorum. In the case of meetings when no public hearing is to be conducted, the rules shall provide that business may be conducted if a simple majority of the currently filled Planning & Zoning Commission positions are present. For the purpose of determining a quorum at meetings and members present at public hearings, the chair shall be considered a member of the Planning & Zoning Commission. (Ord. 5126, 7-18- 2O0O) 5.503: HEARINGS AND MEETINGS: All hearings and meetings of the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be open to the public; the record and minutes of which shall be available for examination in the office of the Village Clerk during regular business hours. Generally, a public hearing is a gathering of the Planning & Zoning Commission, the purpose of which is to take testimony from and permit comment by petitioners and interested parties. A meeting is a gathering at which the Planning & Zoning Commission deliberates and votes with respect to matters before it. At public hearings and meetings of the Planning & Zoning Commission, any interested person may appear in person or may be represented by duly authorized agents or attorneys. Regular meetings of the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be held in the Senior Citizen Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois, on the second and fourth Thursday of each month at the hour of seven o'clock (7:00) P.M., or at such other location, time or date as may be designated by the chair of the Planning & Zoning Commission, following proper notice as described in Section 14.203 of this Code. No testimony shall be taken and no witnesses may be heard except at a properly convened public hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission. o All testimony before the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be given under oath and a summary of such testimony and proceedings shall be subsequently prepared by the recording secretary, Any petitioner or other interested party may provide at the Petitioners own expense, a court reporter to transcribe testimony given in any case so heard by the Planning & Zoning Commission, provided that the Department of Community Development is given a copy of the transcript. The chair or in the chair's absence, the vice chairperson shall administer or authorize the administration of oaths and may compel the attendance of witnesses. o No vote of the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be had at any public hearing unless the Planning & Zoning Commission shall by notice provide that such public hearing shall also be deemed a meeting and minutes of the hearing are maintained by the secretary. The Director of Community Development is authorized to make such additional charges to any Petitioner as may be necessary to cover the costs of the Village in the event the filing fees ara insufficient to cover the cost of the application, review and public hearing. All meetings of the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be held at the call of the chair and at such other times as the said Planning & Zoning Commission may determine by role. The Planning & Zoning Commission shall keep minutes of its meetings, indicating the vote of each member upon every question or any absence or failure to vote. The Planning & Zoning Commission shall make its decision or its determination on all matters presented to it within a reasonable time. The following shall apply to such decision making: ao The Planning & Zoning Commission may reverse or confirm, wholly or partly, or may modify or amend any order, requirement, decision or determination, appealed from to the extent and in the manner the Commission may decide to be fitting and proper, subject to the provisions' contained in this Article, Chapter 14 of this Code or under applicable law. 4 (1) The concurring vote of four (4) members of the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be necessary to reverse any zoning determination of the Director of Community Development, or to approve any variation or to make a positive recommendation with respect to any variation. (2) The concurring vote of a simple majority of those members of the Planning & Zoning Commission in attendance (so long as a quorum is present) shall be necessary to recommend or grant a variation from Chapter 14 of this Code, or to recommend or decide in favor of the petitioner on any matter upon which the Planning & Zoning Commission is required to pass under Chapter 14 of this Code or any other ordinance of the Village. In all instances where the decision of the Planning & Zoning Commission is final, such decision shall be a final administrative determination and shall be subject to review by a court of law in the manner provided by applicable Illinois statutes. D. All special hearings of the Planning & Zoning Commission shall be held at the call of the chair and at such other times as the Planning & Zoning Commission may determine. All of the foregoing rules and regulations governing the conduct of hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission at regular meetings shall apply to hearings at special meetings of the Planning & Zoning Commission. (Ord. 5128, 7-18-2000) 5.504: JURISDICTION: The Planning & Zoning Commission is hereby vested with the following jurisdiction and authority and it shall be its duty: To hold public hearings on requests for amendments to Chapter 14 of this Code and forward its findings and recommendations on such requests to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village. To hear and decide appeals from any zoning determination made by the Director of Community Development in the administration or ehforcement .... of Chapter 14 of this Code. Jo To hear and decide or forward recommendations as is appropriate for variations, conditional uses and/or relief from the regulations and restrictions contained in Chapter 14 of this Code. To hear and decide or make recommendations on such other matters as may be committed to the jurisdiction of the Planning & Zoning Commission by other ordinances of the Village or at the direction of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village. To hear and decide all requests for variations, special uses and appeals pursuant to the Village Sign Ordinance Chapter 7 of this Code. (Ord. 5126, 7-18-2000) To hear and forward recommendations on all requests for exceptions to Chapter 16, The Development Code. To prepare, amend and recommend to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village an Official Comprehensive Plan ("the Plan") for the present and future development or redevelopment of the Village. The Official Comprehensive Plan and its amendments shall be accomplished in accordance with Section 5.704 of this Article. To recommend changes, from time to time, in the Official Comprehensive Plan after review and public hearing. To give aid to the Municipal officials charged with the direction of projects for improvements embraced within the Plan, and to generally promote the realization of the Plan. To review and recommend the denial or the approval of plats of subdivision. No map or plat of any subdivision or resubdivision presented for recording, affecting land within the corporate limits of the Village, or contiguous territory outside of but not more distant than one and one-half (1 2) miles from such limits of the Village, shall be entitled to be recorded or shall be valid unless the subdivision shall meet the subdivision regulations as set forth in the Village's development code and otherwise conform to any reqdirements shown in the Official Comprehensive Planning of the ~/illage. The procedures for review of such maPs or'plats of subdivision shall be as established within the subdivision regulations of the Village which are a constituent part of the development code. To make recommendations to the Village Board with respect to the Village's development, review and planning processes. To recommend regulations, projects and programs pertinent to the development, redevelopment and renewal of the Village and such surrounding territory over which the Village exercises subdivision jurisdiction. To exemise such other powers as may be conferred by the corporate authorities. (Ord. 5125, 7-18-2000) 5.505: THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Planning & Zoning Commission shall carry out its responsibilities with respect to the Official Comprehensive Plan according to the following: Ao After receiving a proposed comprehensive plan or an amendment to an existing comprehensive plan, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall hold a Public headng to consider such plan or amendment. Not less than fifteen (15) days pdor to the public hearing, notice of the proposed headng, setting forth the time and date and place shall be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Village and the contiguous unincorporated area. The headng may be recessed to another date if not concluded; provided, notice of the time and place is publicly announced at the hearing at the time of such recess or notice is given by newspaper publication not less than five (5) days prior to the rescheduled hearing. No testimony regarding the Comprehensive Plan or any amendments shall be taken, and no witnesses heard, except at a properly convened public hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission. No comprehensive plan or amendment shall be adopted by the President and Board of Trustees that has not been submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission for review, public hearing and recommendation. The Plan may be adopted in whole or in separate geographical or functional parts, each of which, when adopted, shall be the Official ....... ~- Comprehensive Plan or a constituent part of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village. 7 The Plan, by its very terms, may be made applicable to land situated within the corporate limits of the Village and contiguous territory not more than one and one-half (1 2) miles beyond the corporate limits of the Village. The Plan may designate land suitable for annexation to the Village, along with recommended zoning classification for such land upon annexation. The Plan shall be the primary planning guide of the Village, but shall not be construed to actually regulate or control the use of private property which is the function of the Zoning Ordinance and Official Maps. The Official Comprehensive Plan and any ordinances implementing it shall be on file with the Village Clerk and shall be available at all times during regular business hours for public inspection. Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the public hearing held by the Planning & Zoning Commission, the Planning & Zoning Commission shall make its wdtten recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees. If the Planning & Zoning Commission fails to make such written recommendation within ninety (90) days, then the President and Board of Trustees may proceed to consider adoption of such Comprehensive Plan or portion of the Comprehensive Plan or an amendment to an existing comprehensive plan in the same manner as if the Planning & Zoning Commission had made a written recommendation. After consideration of the recommendation of:the Planning & Zoning Commission of a proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, the President and Board of Trustees shall either adopt the Comprehensive Plan or amendment in whole or in part or reject the entire Comprehensive Plan or amendment. If approved, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village shall enact the ordinances necessary to give effect to the Plan. If, at the expiration of one hundred eighty (180) days after the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission to the President and Board of Trustees, the President and Board of Trustees have taken no formal action, the. Comprehensive Plan or amendment may not be acted upon by the President and Board of Trustees without renewing the public notice and public hearing process. ' ' ' J. The Plan and its amendments, if approved and adopted, shall become effective upon the expiration of ten (10) days after the date of filing notice of such adoption with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds. K. Copies of the Plan, all ordinances implementing it, and the Official Map, shall be available to any interested party upon payment by the party of the sum established to cover the cost of its printing and distribution. (Ord. 5125, 7-18-2000) SECTION 2: Any reference in Chapter 14, Zonin.q, of the Mount Prospect Village Code, to the "Zoning Board of Appeals" shall be changed to a reference to the "Planning & Zoning Commission" and any reference to the "Plan Commission" in Chapter 16 - Development Code shall be changed to a reference to the "Planning & Zoning Commission". SECTION 3: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001. Gerald L. Farley, Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: HUMAN RESOURSES DIRECTOR PATRICK SEGER DATE: OCTOBER 8, 2001 SUBJECT: RETIREMENT HEALTH SAVINGS (RHS) As part of the Firefighter Union contract, both the Union and the Village agreed to participate in a retirement health insurance contribution program. The program chosen is administered by the International City Manager Association Retirement Corporation (ICMA-RC), which allows for tax-deferred contributions to be made on behalf of the employee by the employer and tax-free reimbursement of medical related expenses upon retirement. As part of the agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and ICMA-RC, the Village must adopt a resolution establishing the RHS plan. I will serve as the primary contact and coordinator of the plan. Upon approval of the resolution, a separate account will be set-up for each firefighter within the ICMA-RC investment VantageCare mutual fund. The employee contribution will be held in a trust, in an interest bearing account, in the employee's name. Also, not unlike our 457 retirement plans, each employee participating will have the ability to choose the level of investment risk within their own VantageCare funds. Per the contract, the new benefit will allow for an annual contribution of 19 hours of holiday pay to be made on behalf of each firefighter. Also, upon retirement, the employee will have 100% of the value of sick time up to 720 hours, and 50% of the value of sick time above 720 hour but less than 1152 hours, contributed to the employee VantageCare account. The value of accrued sick time will be calculated by multiplying the employee's hourly rate of pay as of the date of retirement. These contributions are consistent with benefits already paid, so this contribution is a redirection of existing money. . Once employees are officially retired, they will be eligible to access the money within their VantageCare account for reimbursement of medical expenses eligible under IRS Section 213. Some medical expenses include, but are not limited to; health insurance premiums, insurance co-pays and pharmacy expenses. Again, health related reimbursements are tax- free when used under the RHS plan. etirement Health Savings (RHS) October 8, 2001 Page 2 Attached you will find the proposed resolution for the Village Board's consideration. I recommend the approval of this resolution. If aPprOved, the plan will go into effect January 1,2002. If you have any questions, please contact me. Patrick J~ ' r Human R irector Attachment c: Assistant Village Manager Dave Strahl H:\GEN\Personnel\Memos\RHS Memo to Village Council.doc vwl 10/9/01 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE VANTAGECARE RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ' WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect ("the EmployeF) has employees rendering valuable services to the community; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a retiree health savings plan for such employees serves the interests of the Employer by enabling it to provide reasonable security regarding such employees' health needs during retirement, by providing increased flexibility in its personnel management system, and by assisting in the attraction and retention of competent personnel; WHEREAS, the Employer has determined that the establishment of a retiree health savings plan to be administered by the Illinois City Manager Association (ICMA) Retirement Corporation and/or its affiliates serves the above objectives; and WHEREAS, the Employer desires that its retiree health savings plan ("the Plan") be administerd by the ICMA Retirement Corporation and/or its affiliates. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize the Employer to adopt the Plan in the form of the ICMA Retirement Corporation's VantageCare Retiree Health Savings Plan. SECTION TWO: That the assets of the Plan shall be held in trust, with the Employer serving as trustee, for the exclusive benefit of Plan participants and their beneficiaries, and the assets of the Plan shall not be diverted to any other purpose. SECTION THREE: That the Human Resources Director shall be the coordinator and contact for the Plan, and shall receive necessary reports and notices. VantageCare Page 2/2 SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. :.~ -. · .-" AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSEDandAPPROVEDthis day of ., 2001. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley Mayor Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\G EN\files\WlN\RES\Retiree svgs plan,Vantagecare,doc NORTHWEST SUBURBAN MUNICIPAL JOINT AOTION WATER AGENCy 903 BRANTWOOD AVENUE ELK GROVE VILLAGE, ILLINOIS 60007 TELEPHONE 847/981-4083 FAX 847/981-4085 Memorandum 02-47 To: From: Subject: Date: Executive Committee Mare Hummel, Chairman, Village of Hanover Park Gary Pardn, Manager, Village Of Elk Grove Village Jim Norris, Manager, Village of Hoffman Estates Michael Janonis, Manager, Village of Mount Prospect Thomas Melena, Manager, City of Rolling Meadows Ken Fdtz, Manager, Village of Schaumburg J~~wood Joseph G Fennell, EXecutive DirectOr . BOard of Directors Appointments September 27, 2001 SECOND REQUEST Enclosed please find materials relating to the terms of office for representatives to the Agency Board of Directors. The enclosed documents are those that were executed in 1999 and for most communities need to be re-authorized as of the new fiscal year.. In order that the Directors be seated in a timely way, it is necessary that each community consider the appointment of it's representative and alternate to the JAWA Board. Please give your attention to this request and, after adoption, please forward a certified copy of your legislative action to the Agency. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. If I can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. SCHAUMBURG ELK GROVE VILLAGE MOUNT PROSPECT HOFFMAN ESTATES HANOVER PARK vwf 10/9/01 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDNANCE DESIGNATING REPRESENTATIVES~ ~_.:.. .... TO THE NORTHWEST SUBURBAN MUNICIPAL JOINT ACTION WATER AGENCY FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a member of the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency, as authorized by OrdinanCe No. 3081; and ¢" WHEREAS, Section 9 of the Joint Action Water Agency Agreement and ArticleS il and III of the by-laws to said Agency require the members to designate and appoint both a representative and alternate representative of the Village to the Board of Directors of the Joint Action Water Agency and the Executive Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Gerald L. Farley, Village President, is hereby appointed as Director, and Richard Lohrstorfer, Village Trustee, as Alternate Director of the Board of Directors of the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water AgenCY, for a term beginning May 1, 2001, and expiring April 30, 2003. SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001. ATTEST: Gerald b Farley, Village President Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE ENGINEER OCTOBER 10, 2001 JUDITH ANN DR. STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT Background The Community Development and Public Works Departments (and others) have been working with the residents on Judith Ann for several years on a number of issues. The residents and Village staff have been pursuing common interests in resolving issues including, property maintenance of the dwellings and grounds, resurfacing of Judith Ann Drive, providing additional parking for the area, and addressing deferred maintenance of private property. The property owners' role in the effort was to establish a Home Owners Association. This body would support property maintenance standards and coordinate property improvements to meet the needs of both the residents and the Village. As of this month, that Home Owners AssociatiOn has been established. In order to support that effort and help meet the needs of the residents, the road reconstruction of Judith Ann (originally scheduled as part of the Village-wide road improvement program two years ago) has been expanded to include additional parking on the road. In return for the new road Surface and additional parking, the Judith Ann Homeowners AsSociation has agreed to take over control (as a private sti'eet) and maintenance responsibilities for Judith Ann Drive. As part of the road resurfacing project, the water line under Judith Ann is being replaced. That line has a history of main breaks and leaving it unimproved would compromise the integrity of the pavement. Bids Results A notice to bidders was published in a local newspaper. On October 9, 2001, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the Judith Ann Drive Street Reconstruction and Water Main Replacement Project. At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opeP~d and read aloud. ' . Six contractors received contract bid documents and five icontractors submitted .bids, -. The bids ranged from a Iow of $386,316.50 by Patnick C0nstruction,.Inc. to a hig.h of $518,559.00 by Neri Brothers Construction Inc. The Engineer's estimate for the project . was $450,000.00. The Iow bid of $386,316.50, is 15% below the Engineer's Estimate. age two ... J[~dith Ann Drive Bid Recommendation October 11, 2001 Below is a summary of the bids. Bidders Patnick Construction, Inc. Tdne Construction Corp. Arrow Road Construction Co. Hardin Paving Company Ned Brothers Construction Inc. Total Bid $386,316.50 $403,110.35 $484,103.77 $503,867.00 $518,559.00 Discussion All bidders submitted IDOT Local Agency Bid Bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bids as required by the Contract Documents. All bids were checked for their accuracy. Minor errors were found but these errors did not affect the Iow bid and did not affect the order of the bids. All bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. The Iow bidder Patnick Construction, Inc. completed the Maple Street Water Main Replacement Project (1998) for the Village and their work was acceptable. Recommendation I therefore recommend that the Iow bidder Patnick Construction, Inc. be awarded the contract for the Judith Ann Drive Street Reconstruction and Water Main Replacement Proiect in the amount not to exceed $386,316.50. Funds for the road and water main improvements are provided by the Village's CDBG program, since the Judith Ann area was designated as a Iow/moderate income area through an income survey conducted last year. I concur with the above recommendation. I concur with the above recommendation. Communal'~-~'''' ' D~ent}"-- Director William Cooney X:\FILES\ENGINEER\PROJECTS\STREETS\judiI:h_annV~EMO_JAN, DOC INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OCTOBER 11, 2001 2001/2002 ROAD SALT CONTRACT As you are aware, we routinely purchase road salt for our winter snow and ice control efforts through the State of Illinois Joint Purchasing Program. It has been our experience that generally vendors supplying salt for this program have consistently maintained adequate stockpiles and offered acceptable delivery terms at competitive prices. Last year the State contract was awarded to the Detroit Salt Company, whose performance was the worst we have ever experienced. They rarely met the delivery time frame and were repeatedly fined. BID RESULTS This year, the-state contract for road salt was awarded to IMC Salt Inc. of Overland Park, Kansas. IMC Salt Inc. had the state contract in 98/99-snow season and performed adequately. As in the past, deliveries are guaranteed not to exceed seven calendar days from time of receipt to actual delivery. IMC Salt's unit cost for this year's contract is $31.96 per ton delivered. Last year, the rate was $25.61 per ton. We anticipate that we will use approximately 4,000 tons of salt this winter. Below is a chart of salt costs, usage and total dollars expended for the past four years, plus the number of times crews actually applied salt or plowed the village streets. Snow Season IDOT Supplier Cost/Ton Tons Pumhased Total Expended Salting Plowing 1997/1998 Cargill $28.03 3701 $103,749.40 20 13 1998/1999 IMC Salt $27.92 3868 $107,998.19 22 19 1999/2000 Cargill $26.72 3818 $102,024.71 23 6 2000/2001 Detroit Salt $25.61 4216 $101,428.47 33 22 (Deducts of $6,029 were taken for late delivery) 2000/2001 Morton Salt $33.16 883'33 $ 29,291.22 Emergency Purchases Due to Detr lot's failure to deliver. ___ 2001/2002 IMC Salt $31.96 Est 4,000 tons $127,840.00 X:\files\fronto ffistreets~stsalt20O 1 001/2002 ROAD SALT CONTRACT October 11, 2001 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is my recommendation that the Village participate in the State of Illinois Joint Purchasing Program for road salt during the 2001/2002-winter season and award a contract to IMC Salt Inc. at $31.96 per ton, not to exceed $160,555. The bid received is based on an estimated quantity, which will be adjusted so that the total expenditure does not exceed the budgeted amount. There is a balance of $40,115 in the account code #0505105- 570540 for fiscal year 2001. For the upcoming fiscal year 2002, proposed funds are on page 214, account code #0505105-570540 in the amount of $108,715 and on page 215, account code #0015108- 570540 in the amount of $11,725. Total funding available is $160,555. With your concurrence, please forward this to the Village Board for their approval. X:\files\fronto ff~streets~stsalt2001 Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUB3: VTLLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E, 3ANONI'S DEPUTY DfRECTOR OF PUBLI'C WORKS OCTOBER 11~ 2001 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NAT]'ONAL POLLUTANT DTSCHARGE EL'rMI'NATI'ON SYSTEM PHASE 2 COMPLTANCE TRr~E CITt' USA Background NPDE$ Phase i Ru/e In 1990, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) promulgated regulations establishing Phase I of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) storm water program. The Phase I rule required operators of large municipally owned separate storm sewer systems, those serving populations of 100,000 or more, to develop and implement storm water management programs. The rule established specific criteria for acceptable programs and made each effort subject to USEPA or local environmental protection agency approval. These programs were intended to be an initial effort to reduce the quantity of pollutants picked up by storm sewers and discharged to waterways during storm events. USEPA believes that these programs can be effective at limiting the discharge of many common waterway pollutants including oil and grease from roadways, pesticides from lawns, sediment from construction sites, and litter. NPDE$ Phase 2 Ru/e in 2000, USEPA rule makers finished the phase 2 rule. This rule extends the NPDES storm ~vater program requirements to smaller municipally owned storm sewer systems situated in urban areas. The Mount Prospect separate storm sewer system is covered by the Phase 2 rule, it is important to note that storm sewers differ from combined sewers or sanitary sewers. The Village currently owns and operates all three (3) types of sewers. Combined sewers collect both wastewater and storm water in a single pipe network; The Village's combined sewer system discharges to the Metropolitan Water Reclamation Distdct of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC) interceptor system for transport and treatment at wastewater treatment plants. The sanitaw sewer systems collect only wastewater. The Village's sanitary sewers are also tributaw to the MWRDGC treatment plants. Storm sewers drain only storm water from roadways and other impervious areas. These sewers discharge to local waterways without any treatment. The NPDES Phase 2 rules only apply to storm sewers. The Village operates approximately 80 miles of storm sewers. These sewers primarily drain areas of the Village developed after 1960. The Village's storm sewers discharge to HcDonald Creek, Feehanville Creek, Weller Creek, and Higgins Creek. Each of these waterways ultimately outflows to the Des Plaines River. Page 2 of 4 RFP National Pollutant Discharge EliminaUon System Phase 2 Compliance October ll, 200! NPDE$ Phase 2 Permit t?equ/remonts USEPA designed the Phase 2 rule to utilize a general permit approach. Under this approach, USEPA will issue general permits to local environmental protection agencies. In Illinois, we believe that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency will hold the general permit for all, or most, storm sewer operators in the state. The Village, in turn, will be required_ ~o:fi!~ a notice of intent to join the state's permit by March 1, 2003. : In order to join the state's permit, the Village will be required to develop a written storm water management program that includes the following specific elements: Public Education and Outreach A plan for distributing educational materials and performing outreach to inform citizens about the impacts polluted storm water runoff discharges can have on water quality. Pub/lc Part/c/pat/on/ Znvo/vement A method of providing opportunities for citizens to participate in program de~,e~opment and implementation, including effectively publicizing public hearings and/or encouraging citizen representatives on a storm water management panel. Elicit Discharge Detect/on and El/m/nation Develop and implement a plan to detect and eliminate elicit discharges to the storm sewer system (includes developing a system map and informing the community about hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste). Construction Site Runoff ~ontrol Develop, implement, and enforce an erosion and sediment control program for construction activities that disturb I or more acres of land (controls could include silt fences and temporary storm water detention ponds). Post-Construction Runoff Control Develop, implement, and enforce a program to address discharges of post-construction storm water runoff from new development and redevelopment areas. Applicable controls could include preventative actions such as protecting sensitive areas (_e.g., wetlands) or the use of structural best management practices such as grassed 'swales or porous pavement. Poi/ut/on Prevent/on/Good Housekeeping Develop and implement a program to reduce pollutant runoff from municipal operations. The program must include municipal staff training on pollution prevention measures and techniques (e.g., regular street sweeping, reduction in the use of pesticides, or frequent catch-basin cleaning). Request for Proposals Staff has prepared a detailed written request for proposals (RFP) intended to solicit aid from qualified consultants capable of helping the Village satisfy these requirements. This RFP was entitled Comprehensive Storm Water hCanagement Plan. The scope of this request outlined the following specific work tasks: Page 3 of 4 RFP National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase 2 Compliance October ~.:L, 200:~ Recommend Best ~lanaaement Practice~. Review existing Village practices relating to the maintenance of storm sewers and the regulation Of non-point source pollution. Tdentify existing practices and/or recommend new practices that are necessary to satisfy permit requirements. Deve/o~ ~leasurab/e Goa/~. Develop viable, measurable goals acceptabl_e-_tO .!he _general permitting authority for each best management practice. Revise Ordinances. Revie. w existing ordinances relating to elicit storm sewer discharge prohibition, construction site erosion control, and permanent storm water controls for land development. If necessary, revise existing ordinances or draft new ordinances necessary to demonstrate compliance with permit requirements. Storm Sewer ~lappinq. Perform survey of existing storm sewer systems including all pipes, creeks, structures, out-falls, inlets, catch basins, manholes, and other structures. Global positioning points shall be collected for all storm sewer system surface features. Pre,are Comprehensive Storm Water Nanaqement P/an: Prepare plan document that cTearly and explicitly identifies and describes the Village's ordinances, best management practices, storm sewer system mapping efforts, and the measurable goals relating to general permit requirements. Prepare Not/ce of Znten~. Prepare a formal notice of intent document indicating the Village's intent to join the State of illinois general permit. The notice of intent shall descdbe the storm water management plan including the best management practices, measurable goals, and mapping efforts. The proposed timeline for this project suggested a fall 2001 start and a fall 2002 final completion. Results This request for proposals was distributed to three (3) qualified environmental engineering firms. Prior to accepting proposals, staff met with each firm to discuss the project scope and assess each firm's ability to successfully complete the project. All three (3) firms submitted Proposals. The results are as follows: Firm Cost Stanley Consultants, Inc. Baxter & Woodman, ThC. Law Engineering. Thc. $199,947 $335,555 $364,010 Staff reviewed all proposals and determined that all submittals were responsive, in addition, all proposals outlined approaches that satisfied RFP requirements. Discussion in the current budget, $75,000 has been allotted to fund the first year of what staff envisioned being a multi-year project. Tn addition, another $75,000 has been requested to continue funding the project in 2002. The Capital improvements Plan (CTP) includes similar requests for each of the next five (5) years. age 4 of 4 RFP National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase 2 Compliance October 1~., 200! The apparent lowest cost proposal was submitted by Stanley Consultants, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois. An award to Stanley would require expenditure of all funds allotted for 2001. It would also require a $50,000 increase in the 2002 budget request for this project (from $75,000 to $125,000). Staff is reluctant to endorse an award committing the Village to such a substantial budget modification. hCodi~ed Pro~ect To avoid this problem, staff has negotiated a revised proposal from Stanley. This revised proposal is based on a reduction of the project scope. Specifically, staff has suggested limiting the storm sewer mapping element to approximately one-half of the existing system. All other elements of the project, including ordinance review, development of best management practices, and preparation of a comprehensive storm water management plan, remain unchanged; Stanley proposed to perform this revised scope of work for a cost not to exceed $126,790. This modified project would be completed by early summer 2002 and would only require expenditure of the existing budget allotment ($75,000) and part of the 2002 bUdget_request ($7S,000). Upon completion of this modified project, it is the intent of staff to secure more precise cost estimates from Stanley for completing the balance of the storm sewer mapping element. A revised, more accurate, request will then be submitted to complete the mapping work in 2003. It is the opinion of staff that this modified approach to the project will satisfy IEPA NPDES Phase 2 general permit requirements. Staff has learned that final completion of the mapping element is not necessary in order to successfully file a notice of intent to join the statewide general permit. Rather, our notice of intent must simply specify a reasonable plan and funding mechanism to complete the mapping element on a timely basis. Clearly, the modified project, as presented herein, will satisfy this requirement. Recommendation I recommend accepting the proposal from Stanley Consultants, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois to provide NPDES Phase 2 compliance assistance for a cost not to exceed $126,790. Stanley Consultants, Inc. has satisfactorily performed a variety of civil and environmental engineering projects for the Village including design and construction engineering for the SeeGwun/Go!f Storm-~ewer Improvements, the Catalpa/Birch Storm Sewer Improvements, and Phase- 1 of the Lake Briarwood Water Main Replacement Project. Funds are available for this proposed expenditure in account number 5907704-540582 on page 291 of the current budget and in account number 5907704-540582 on page 293 of the proposed 2002 budget. Sean P. Dorsey Glen R. Andler ' Director of Public Works Cc: Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler File C:\STORM\PROPOSAL RECOMMENDATION.doc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCE COMMISSION AGENDA Thursday, October 18, 2001 7:00 p.m. PLEASE NOTE CHANGE IN MEETING LOCATION Police/Fire Bui/ding 112 East Northwest Highway 1~t Floor Training Room I Call to Order II Approval of Minutes - Meeting of October 11, 2001 III Review of the Proposed 2002 Village Budget (Community Development, Police, Fire) IV Other Business V Chairman's Report VI Finance Director's Report VII Next Meeting: Thursday, October 25, 2001, 7:00 p.m. VIII Adjournment NOTE: Any individual who would like to attend this meeting but because of a disability needs some acconmxodation to participate should contact the Finance Director's Office at 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, (847) 392-6000, ext. 5277, TDD (847) 392-6064. MAYOR Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele W. Skowron kvana K. Wilks Michael A. ZadeI Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Velma W. Lowe Community Development Department Phone: 847/818-5328 Fax: 847/818-5329 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, illinois 60056 TDO: 847/392-6064 NOTICE THE WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2001 MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION HAS BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO TILE, NEXT MEETING. Dated this 1 lth day of October, 2001. Glen R. Andier Mount Prospect Public Works Oepartment 1-700 w. osnCral Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 80058-2229 Phone 84-7/870-56]40 Fax 847/253-9377 Paul C. Bures TDD 847/392-1235 MINUTES OF TKE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION DRAFT CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, October 8, 2001. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Chuck Bencic Lee Beening John Keane Andy Mitchell Buz Livingston Paul Bures Matt Lawrie Chairman Commissioner Commissioner .Commissioner Fire Department Public Works Public Works/Engineering Division Absent: Nancy Bobike'~Scz Joan Bjork Rich Eddington Commissioner Commissioner Police Department Others in Attendance: See Attached Attendance Sheet. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Beening, seconded by Commissioner Keane, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on September 10, 2001. The minutes were approved by a vote of 6-0. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD No citizens came forth to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda. Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink NEW BUSINESS A) REVIEW OF PAIL.KING RESTKICTIONS AROUND PROSPECT HIGH sCHOOL I) Background Information The Village Board of Trustees at their September 18th meeting passed an ordinance that restricted parking on four Village Streets near Prospect High School. The Safety Commission and Village Board of Trustees indicated a desire for Staff to monitor the effect of the new parking restrictions on the streets in question and the rest of the neighborhood. The Safety Commission asked that this issue be brought before them again for further discussion. 2) Staff Study Before the recent parking restrictions were approved, Staff observed 30-45 vehicles parked along both sides of the 500 to 700 blocks of Fairview Avenue during the school day. Since enacting the new parking restrictions, student parking has not been seen on the affected streets. Before the recent parking restrictions were approved, Staff observed a total of approximately 60 vehicles parked on various Village streets. Over the past two weeks, Staff has observed approximately 20 vehicles parked on various Village streets that do not currently have parking restrictions. While some students may have elected to find other ways to get to school, it is believed many students have shifted back to parking on streets in Arlington Heights. Staff has observed approximately 45 vehicles parking on their streets during the school day. Staff has also observed that half of the vehicles parking on Village streets during the school day are doing so on the 400 block of Forest Avenue. The remaining vehicles are on the 400 blocks of Dale Avenue, MacArthur Boulevard, Oak Street, Fairview Avenue and Prospect Manor as well as the 500 and 600 blocks of Eastwood Avenue. Staff has received a few phone calls from residents on the 400 block of Forest Avenue concerning the amount of student parking on their block. As was discussed at the previous Safety Commission meeting, the long-term solution is for the school to provide a sufficient number of parking spaces on their property to accommodate the demand. A new parking lot is currently proposed to be built in 2004 and 2005. Also, approximately I40 spaces are currently not in use until the end of October due to band practice. The current parking issues around Prospect High School are much less in magnitude than compared to a month ago. Staff has not observed the amount of vehicles concentrated to one area like was seen on Fairview Avenue. Staff believes that at the end of October when the 140 parking spaces are made available, the issues on streets such as the 400 block of Forest Avenue will be resolved. Extending parking restrictions south and east would address recent concerns raised by some residents in the neighborhood. This would, in turn, hopefully cause some more students to find Other alternatives to get to school. However, should students simply decide to continue to drive, Prospect High School parking now begins to encroach on Fairview Elementary School traffic. Staff spent a significant amount of time earlier this year correcting traffic problems associated with the school and does not want to create new problems. 3) Recommendation Based on the study performed by Staff: The Village Traffic Engineer recommends to not enact any further parking restrictions around Prospect High School at this time. Discussion Traffic Engineer.L~awrie made a brief presentation on this issue. Chairman Bencic opened up the discussion to the public. There was no One in the audience that wished to speak on this issue. Chairman Bencic asked if there were any measures that could be installed along the edge of streets that do not have curb and gutter to deter vehicles from parking on the grass. Mr. Bures stated that the Village has in the past installed plastic delineators at the comers of intersections but they don't always prove successful. Commissioner Beaning asked if further parking restrictions were ever recommended, would residents be notified? Traffic Engineer Lawrie stated surveys would be sent to residents. Chairman Bencic asked that Staff respond to those letters that were received from residents ~:equesting additional parking restrictions notifying them of the Safety Commission's and :qillage Board's decisions. Commissioner Beening, seconded by Mr, Bures, moved to not enact any further parking restrictions at this time and continue to monitor the neighborhood. Staff is to respond to those letters that were received from residents requesting additional parking restrictions. The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. B) l) REQUEST FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS AROUND LIONS PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Background Information The Village received a petition from the school with 120 signatures requesting parking restriction changes around the school. School attendance is at an ail-time high (around 650 students) this year. Mobile classrooms were added this summer to address the increase in attendance. More and more students are being driven to school by parents. Also, at the suggestion of Village Staff, the school has closed the long-term parking lot off of Council Trail to parents for drop-off and pick-up. The congestion in the parking lot often spilled out onto Council Trail causing gridlock and an unsafe situation for students walking in the area. By closing the parking lot, traffic movement along Council Trail has greatly improved but has created congestion along the streets south of Council Trail. Also, the short-term parking lot off of School Street often times is filled and there is a need. for additional short-term parking. 2) Staff Study Site visits were conducted during the weeks of September 24th and October 1st. Visits were done at different times throughout the school day. School begins at 9am, lets out at 3:30pm and has kindergarten pick-up/drop-off at noon. In the morning, the drop-off occurs from about 8:45am to 9:05am. There is a continuous flow of traffic during this time period. Parents primarily use the north side of Council Trail in front of the school for drop-off. The school places traffic cones down the center of the street to avoid double-parking and passing. The cones assist in making the drop-off time orderly and safe. School Street, Elm Street and Maple Street are also used by parents for drop-off. These streets can become congested for a brief period of time when vehicles are parked on both sides making it difficult to maintain two-way traffic. Crossing guards (teachers and students) help students cross Council Trail at both Elm Street and School Street. Overall, the drop-off time runs smoothly except for some congestion along some of the streets south of Council Trail. Only kindergarten classes are dismissed to the School Street side of the school. Around lunchtime, drop-offand pick-up occurs for these classes. Congestion is not a problem during this time of the day. During the day, however, the short-term parking lot can become full making it difficult for parents to find parking in front of the school according to school administration. Parents often complain to the school that there is not enough short-term parking adjacent to the school. Teachers and volunteers who cannot find space in the long-term parking lot often park on Maple Street north of Council Trail and on Elm Street and School Street south of Council Trail. In the afternoon, pick-up occurs from about 3:25pm to 3:45pm. The congestion appears to be greatest in the afternoon as parents are parked in their vehicles and waiting for their children. At the time school lets out, Staff observed over 100 vehicles parked on Village streets around the school. Vehicles were observed to be parked on the north side of Council Trail between Emerson Street and Owen Street. The west side of School Street north of Council Trail was full of parked vehicles. Also} both sides of Elm Street for most of the block and School Street for half the block south of Council Trail were full of parked vehicles. Maple Street north of Council Trail had vehicles parked on both sides for the entire block. South of Council Trail, Maple Street only has experienced a few parked vehicles. The afternoon pick-up time runs smoothly with the exception of congestion on Elm Street and School Street south of Council Trail. Two-way traffic cannot be maintained for about 20 minutes along these streets. Parents were observed turning around in driveways and blocking driveways. Students were observed walking between parked cars and crossing the street not at a crosswalk. 61 surveys were distributed to those residents that live adjacent to the proposed parking restrictions. 29 surveys were returned to the Village. The question that was asked in the survey was, I~hat insight can you provide or experiences can you share that would support or oppose the parking, restrictions? 8 surveys opposed the proposed parking restrictibns. The remaining surveys either supported the additional parking restrictions or provided other suggestions. Difficulty accessing driveways, traffic congestion and a need to improve children safety were a few comments. 3) Parking restrictions should alleviate the congestion experienced on some of the streets around the school. Restricting parking only on one side of the street will allow two-way traffic to be maintained. Residents will still be able to use one side of the street for parking and should have an easier time accessing their driveways. Restricting parking on the east side of the streets was chosen for a reason. By allowing drop-off and pick-up on the west side, vehicles are facing away from the school. The hope is that parents will continue south and use Berkshire Lane to leave the area rather than mining around and further congesting Council Trail. While Elm Street expe~iences vehicles parked on both sides of the street for a majority of the block, Maple Street and School Street do not. By restricting parking to only one side of the street, many parents will have to find a new area to drop-off and pick-up their child. It is anticipated that Maple Street and School Street will experience more vehicles should the new parking restrictions be approved. Therefore, parking restrictions on these two streets would be necessary. Adjacent streets such as Berkshire Lane and Owen Street that do not have parking restrictions and are not experiencing problems now are not anticipated to see a large volume of parked vehicles and, therefore, were not included in the study. Even after this study, Staff will continue to monitor the area and address any other traffic-related issues as necessary. Restricting parking on the north side of Council Trail in front of the school will assure the area is only used for drop-off and pick-up during the school day. Allowing parking during the day will only further compound the congestion problem. The school has put up their own signs that state the north side of the street is a pick-up and drop-offzone only. Village Code, however, currently allows parking. Modifying the current parking reslrietions along the west side of School Street. north of Council Trail should benefit both the school and residents. Th~" school has expressed a-i~eed for additional short-term parking adjacent to the school. While not enthusiastic about it, Staff will support the request to assist the school with this parking need. By resthcting parking during the peak hours only, drop-off and pick-up spaces are not lost and short-term parking during the day is provided. Parking is also currently not allowed on the east side of the street. By relaxing the parking restrictions on the west side of the street, residents can also now take advantage of the street parking during the day. However, should the Village find parents or residents continually parking on the street during drop-off and pick-up times, Staff may consider replacing the signs with the original ones. The current timeframe for the one-way designation on School Street is too restrictive in Staff's opinion. Slightly modifying the times will not have a negative affect on drop-off and pick-up. The new times will also be consistent with the new parking restrictions along the west side of School Street should they be approved. Recommendation In order to address the congestion problems and need for additional short-term parking in the vicinity of Lions Park Elementary School, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends approval of new parking restrictions on Maple Street, Elm Street, School Street and Council Trail; amend current parking restrictions on School Street; and amend the current timeframe for the one-way designation on School Street. 4) Discussion Traffic Engineer Lawrie made a brief presentation on this issue. Chairman Bencic opened up the discussion to the public. Mary Muscarello, 712 S. Hi-Lusi Avenue; Cyndie Spudic, 103 W. Orchard Place; Ricld Sajbel, 616 S. Edward Street; Karen Wabik, 114 S. Elmhurst Avenue are all part of the Traffic Safety Committee at the school. Each person was given the opportunity to share her opinion. They were in support of the school's request except for a couple of issues. First, they would like to see the parking restrictions on the west side of School Street in front of the school entirely lifted. Parents, especially kindergarten parents, have expressed a desire to be able to leave their vehicles to walk their children to and from the school. Second, they would like to see no left turn and no right turn signs for southbound School Street at Council Trail during the drop-off and pick-up times of the school day. Because of the congestion along Council Trail, the Traffic Safety Committee believes the turn restrictions would help to reduce the amount of vehicles on Council Trail. Imre and Sally Soos, 201 E. Moehling Drive, suggested a sticker system for residents so that they could park on the street. Chairman Bencic responded that a sticker system is too difficult for the Police Department to manage and the Village does support that suggestion. Mr. Soos asked if consideration would be given should they have a special circumstance once in a while where they needed to park on the street. Chairman Bencic said the Police Department Would relax the parking restrictions if it were for a legitimate reason. - · No one from the school was in attendance. The Safety Commission and representatives of the Traffic Safety Committee interacted in a lengthy discussion. Traffic Engineer Lawrie responded to the issues raised by the women at the beginning of the discussion. He stated that the block in front of the school on School Street needs to be kept available for drop-off and pick-up. By allowing parking on the street at all times, parents, teachers and residents could potentially occupy much of the block during the afternoon pick-up forcing parents to find other locations to pick-up their child. This, in turn, could create problems on adjacent streets. The compromise was to allow parking except for an hour in the morning and an hour in the afternoon to ensure available drop-off and pick-up space on the street. The women seemed to be in favor of the compromise rather than leaving the current parking restrictions as they are. With respect to the proposed turn restrictions, Traffic Engineer Lawfie said that the turn restrictions would probably deter parents from using the street for drop-off and pick-up because it would be too inconvenient. Chairman Bencic said it would cause School Street south of Council Trail and Berkshire Lane to experience more traffic by not allowing parents to turn onto Council Trail. Traffic Engineer Lawrie said that many parents already continue through the intersection rather than turning when Council Trail becomes congested. Additional discussion took place among the Safety Commission members. Traffic Eng/neer Lawrie responded to more questions and provided clarification on the requests, After over an hour of discussion, Chairman Bencic summarized the discussion and asked if there was a motion. ommissioner Beening, seconded by Mr. Bures, moved to approve the recommendations of the Village Traffic Engineer which are to: approve No Stopping Standing Parking 8am -4ptn School Days signs along the: east side of Maple Street between Moehling Drive and Berkshire Lane east side of Elm Street between Council Trail and Berkshire Lane east side of School Street between Council Trail and Berkshire Lane approve No Parking (Drop-off/Pick-up Zone) 8am - 4pm School Days signs along the north side of Council Trail between Elm Street and School Street repeal No Parking (Drop-off/Pick-up Zone) 8am - 4pm School Days signs along the west side of School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail approve No Parking (Drop-off/Pick-up Zone) 8:30-9:30am & 3-4pm School Days signs along the west side of School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail repeal the current timeframe of 8am-4pm school days for the one-way southbound designation along School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail approve the timeframe of 8:30-9:30am and 3-4pm school days for the one-way southbound designation along School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. OTHER COMMISSION ISSUES Chairman Bencic asked the other Safety Commission members to consider their vote for a Vice Chairman. If all members are present at the next meeting, a vote will be taken. No other Safety Commission items were brought forth at this time. ADJOURNMENT With no further bus. iness to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 6-0 to adjourn at 9:05 p.m. upon the motion of Mr. Bt/res. Commissioner Beening seconded the motion. Respecffully submitted, Tmffic Engineer x:~les\engineerXza fecomm\trafficXrecs&min~oct01 min.doc 7