HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 03/20/2001Next Ordinance No. 5174
Next Resolution No. 9-01
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South Emerson Street Mamh 20, 2001
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks
II1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Skowron
IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Lohrstorfer
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 6, 2001
VI. ~APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
(To be considered under Consent Agenda)
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
(ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS) OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit A)
This ordinance deletes the Class "C" liquor license issued to Walgreens,
1028 South Elmhurst Road, and the Class "R" liquor license issued to
LaTejanita Restaurant, at Two West Busse Avenue. Walgreens is no longer
selling liquor, and LaTejanita is permanently closed.
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT '100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064.
B. Appointments
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IX. CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk are considered routine by the Village Board and will be.
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a
Board member, or resident from the audience, so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
X. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 02-01,2105 W. Prendergast Lane, Residence
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 2105 WEST PRENDERGAST LANE (Exhibit B)
This ordinance grants a variation to allow the construction of an enclosed patio
which would encroach into the required 25' rear yard setback. The Zoning
Board of Appeals has recommended denial by a vote of 2-4; the ordinance
requires a super majority vote for approval.
(This item was deferred from the March 6, 2001 Village Board meeting).
B. Safety Commission final report recommending retaining the left turn restriction
at the intersection of westbound Central Road and Wa-Pella Avenue.
Xl. NEW BUSINESS
A. ~PC 07-00, Hinkle Resubdivision, 2120 White Oak Street
This plat creates a two-lot subdivision from an existing lot.
The Plan Commission has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0.
B. WPC 01-01, Metro Federal Credit Resubdivision, 2440 East Rand Road
This plat consolidates two lots to create a one-lot subdivision.
The Plan Commission has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0.
C. ~PC 03-01, Franzen Resubdivision, 319 North Prospect Manor
This plat consolidates two lots to create a one-lot subdivision.
The Plan Commission has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0,
D, 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 (MERCHANTS,
BUSINESSES, OCCUPATIONS AND AMUSEMENTS) OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit C)
This ordinance amends Article XI, "Public Passenger Vehicles," of Chapter 11
by placing the responsibility for obtaining business licenses from the Village on
the individual owners of taxicabs, rather than on the dispatching company,
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 (MERCHANTS,
BUSINESS, OCCUPATIONS AND AMUSEMENTS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit D)
This ordinance amends Article VII, "Coinoln-Siot Devices," of Chapter 11
by requiring owners of such devices to obtain licenses for both the business
and each machine. Additionally, it requires the owner's information to be
affixed to each machine.
F. Ist reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22 (WATER,
SEWER, AND FLOOD PLAIN REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit E
This ordinance amends Article V, "Meters and Rates," by increasing water and
sewer rates, as requested during the 2001 budget hearings.
G. *A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT
BE'I'WEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND NEXTEL WIRELESS (Exhibit F
This resolution authorizes the Village to enter into a lease agreement with Nextel
for the use of property at 1700 West Central Road for tower space, on the
existing tower.
H. *A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT
BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND SPRINT PCS (Exhibit G)
This resolution authorizes the Village to enter into a lease agreement with
Sprint PCS for the use of property at 1700 West Central Road for tower space,
on the existing tower.
XII. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Request for waiver of b~d requirement and Board approval to purchase
twelve (12) in-car video camera systems under the State bid award program.
B. Request for waiver of b~d requirement and Board approval to award contract
to Kale Uniform Company for the purchase of Fire Department clothing.
C. Status Report
XIII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XlV. CLOSED SESSION
PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (2) -"Collective negotiating matters between the public
body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberati0ns concerning salary
schedules for one or more classes or employees."
XV. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGi= 0~ MOUNT PROSPECT
March 6, 2001
CALL CALL TO ORDER
TO ORDER Mayor Gerald Farley called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
ROLL CALL ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran (arrived late)
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvana Wilks
PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Trustee Prikkel led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION INVOCATION
Mayor Farley gave the invocation.
MINUTES APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held February 20, 2001.
Upon rollcall: Ayes: Comoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
BILLS APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
FINANCIAL Mayor Farley stated that the next item on the agenda, "APPROVE BILLS & FINANCIAL
REPORT REPORT" was shown with an asterisk, and that all items further noted in that manner
be considered with one vote under as "IX. CONSENT AGENDA."
MAYOR'S
REPORT: MAYOR'S REPORT
ESDA AWARD Fire Chief Michael Figolah introduced Kevin Philtips from the Cook County Sheriff's
Emergency Management Agency and Don Anderson from Mount Prospect's Emergency
Services Disaster Agency (ESDA). Mr, Phillips presented the Village with a plaque from
Cook County's Sheriff Mike Sheahan, in recognition of Mount Prospect's assistance to
neighboring communities in March, 2000, when the area experienced a severe rain/wind
storm.
Chief Figolah presented the plaque to Don Anderson, as an expression of gratitude for
his outstanding leadership of Mount Prospect's ESDA..
SEVERE
WEATHER Mayor Fadey read a proclamation acknowledging "Severe Weather Preparedness
WEEK Week," March 4-10, and presented the proclamation to Mr. Anderson.
Mayor Farley read a proclamation in recognition of "Absolutely Incredible Kid Day" and
INCREDIBLE presented it to Ruth Smith and her daughter, who were present on behalf of Campfire
KID DAY Girls and Boys.
CHARACTER Dr. Maureen Hager, President of School District 57, introduced Tom Mataloni, District 57
parent, and Lori Many, Lions Park School teacher. Dr. Hager gave a brief update of the
COUNTS! progress of the national Character Countsl Campaign, and Mr. Mataloni and
Ms. Many provided the audience with a visual presentation.
AMERICAN RED
CROSS MONTH Mayor Fadey read a proclamation recognizing March 1~31 as "American Red Cross
Month." The proclamation will be displayed at the office of the Village Clerk.
The Mayor had no recommendations for board or commission appointments.'
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None
CONSENT
AGENDA: CONSENT AGENDA
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of the following
BILLS items of business:
1. Bills, dated February 28, 2001.
AMEND
CH. 14: 2. Ordinance No. 5173: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 {ZONING)
VARIOUS OF THE VILLAGE CODE
TEXTS Various text amendments
BID RESULTS: 3. Bid results:
CATCH BASIN 1. Catch basin and inlet repair (S. Schroeder Trucking, Inc., not to exceed
REPAIR $40,350)
2. Catch basin and inlet cleaning program (Elgin Sweeping Services, inc.,
not to exceed $35,350)
CATCH BASIN 3. Parkway stump removals (Winkler's Tree Service, not to exceed
CLEANING $53,000)
4. 2001 street resurfacin9 program contract (Arrow Road Construction,
PARKWAY $1,153,703.89)
STUMP
REMOVALS 4. Waive bid procedure and authorize the purchase of two (2) 4x4 pickup trucks
through the State of Illinois purchase program (Terry's Ford Lincoln Mercury, in
RESURFACE Peotone, Illinois, not to exceed $43,770.00 total)
STREETS
5. Ratify expenditure for emergency sewer repair at Pine Street and Lincoln Street
PICKUP (Martam Construction, $36,000)
TRUCKS 6. Authorization of contract with SPACECO, of Rosemont, to provide ALTA survey
for the library/senior center parcel (not to exceed $14,400)
EMERGENCY
SEWER REPAIR Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstoffer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
ALTA SURVEY, Motion carried.
LIBRARY &
SENIOR CTR.
OLD BUSINESS
An ordinance was presented for second reading to grant a variation for the construction
ZBA 02-01 of an enclosed patio, which would encroach 15 feet into the required 25-foot rear yard
2105 setback. '
PRENDERGAST
LANE William Cooney, Director of Community Development, stated that the petitioner had
requested that consideration of this item be deferred to the next meeting.
2
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to defer ZBA 02-01 to the
March 20, 2001 Village Board meeting, at which time it will be presented for second
reading.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer. Prikkel, Skowron, Wiiks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
SAFETY Matt Lawrie. Project Engineer, provided a report from the Safety Commission with the
COMMISSION recommendation to retain the left turn restriction at the intersection of westbound Central
REPORT: LEFT Road and Wa-Pella Avenue.
TURN
RESTRICTION This restriction was approved last year as part of the detour route necessary for the
@ CENTRAL & Route 83 construction project, which ran from June until November. At the end of the
WA-PELLA construction period, all other turn restrictions were repealed except this one, as it was
remanded back to the Safety Commission in December, for review.
Mr. Lawrie explained that based primarily on concerns for motorists' safety and an
efficient flow of traffic, the Safety Commission voted 6-1 to retain this left-turn restriction.
Mr. Bill Eweding, 609 W. Central Road, spoke on behalf of the residents at Central
Village, stating their wishes to,have the ordinance repealed, as they feel that the
restriction has created an excessive amount of "cut-through" traffic within their complex,
creating an unsafe environment for the senior residents.
Mr. Lester Fleming, 105 S. Wa-Pella Avenue, and Mr. Paul Snead also spoke on the
matter.
Several suggestions were offered, including No Outlet signs, additional speed bumps, the
creation of a left turn lane, timed-traffic signals, and limited hours for allowing left turns
onto Wa-Pella.
Following a lengthy discussion, staff was directed to conduct additional traffic studies to
determine whether the number of "cut-thrcughs" is dangerously excessive, and to provide
the Board with a final report at a future meeting,
Trustee Corcoren, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with the
recommendation of the Safety Commission to retain the prohibition of left turns from
westbound Central Road to southbound Wa-Pella Avenue at all times.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
A final report will be provided by staff at the March 20 Village Board meeting.
Trustee Hoefert left the meeting room at this time.
METRO TRANS. A request was presented to the Board to accept a report from Metro Transportation
GROUP Group providing for the reinstatement of left turn movement from eastbound Prospect
REPORT: NO Avenue onto Route 83. This turn has been prohibited since July 21,2000, following a
LEFT TURN, fatal traffic accident, in which the motorist turned left onto Route 83, from eastbound
PROSPECT & Prospect Avenue.
ROUTE 83 The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC), Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT),
and the Village met in February to discuss several recommendations, some of which
were to install supplemental flashing railroad warning lights facing Prospect Avenue
traffic in each direction, and intersectional striping to better guide eastbound turning
motorists into the northbound through lane of Route 83.
3
The recommended traffic signal and roadway modifications identified in the report will be
incorporated in the Route 83 Reconstruction Project that is to be completed in the spring
of 2001.
Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the
recommendations of staff to accept the report from Metro Transportation Group
reinstating left turn movement from eastbound Prospect Avenue onto Route 83.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: Prikkel
Absent: Hoefert
Trustee Hoefert returned at this time.
CORRIDOR VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Mr. Cooney presented a request to waive the bid procedure and award contract to Wolff
IMPROVEMENTS, Clements, L.L.C for design and Construction drawings for corridor improvements at
WOLFF Central/Rand Roads, Central Road/Busse Avenue, and Golf Road/Route 83 ($38,100)
CLEMENTS,
L.L.C. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with staff's
recommendation to waive the bid procedure and award a contract to Wolff Clements,
L.L.C. for the above corridor improvements.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ST. RAYMOND Mr. Cooney presented a request for authorization to enter into an agreement with
CORRIDOR St. Raymond Catholic Church to obtain a temporary construction easement and to install
IMPROVEMENTS corridor improvements along their Route 83 frontage.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of the above request for
a construction easement and corridor improvements at St. Raymond Church.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Village Manager Michael Janonis reminded the Board and audience of the upcoming
Coffee With Council scheduled for Saturday, March 10, and the Chamber of Commerce
Expo scheduled for March 10 and 11, at Randhurst Shopping Center.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Trustee Prikkel asked that staff communicate with the State to get the potholes repaired
on S. Busse Road from Golf Road down to the southern edge of the Village.
CLOSED
CLOSED SESSION
SESSION
Mayor Farley stated that there was a need for a Closed Session to discuss the following:
LITIGATION 5 tLCS 120/2 (c) (11) -"Litigation, when an action against,
affecting or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is
pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body
finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for
the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed
meeting
4
LAND ACQUISITION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (5) - "The purchase or lease of real property for
the use of the public body, inclU~ing~ meetings held for the purpose of discussing whether
a particular parcel should b~ ~ii:~d;"
This item was not listed on the regular agenda.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to meet in reconvene in Closed
Session.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
RECONVENE RECONVENE
The Village Board reconvened in Open Session at 9:31 p.m., and had a brief discussion
regarding leases for wireless communication providers at the Public Works site.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
By unanimous vote, the March 6, 2001 meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
15-Mar-01
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 03/01/01 - Per Attached Credits/ Balance
03/01/01 03/t5/01 List of Bills Debits 0311510f
General Fund 7,929,494 2,070,802 473,209 9,527,087
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,514,151 465,036 114,730 1,864,457
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 2,151,662 124,032 15,220 2,260,473
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 18,643 18,643
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 27,302 27,302
Debt Service Funds 2,491,833 487,697 2,979,529
Capital Projects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 3,176,751 47,938 3,128,814
Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 4,154 4,154~
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 219,400 219,400
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund (21,151) 322,599 (343,750)
Street Improvement Construction Fund 3,857,800 151,893 4,009,693
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund
Flood Control Construction Fund 3,158,845 200,000 3,358,845
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 2,911,879 515,765 272,595 3,155,048
Parking System Revenue Fund 727,572 5,534 ~ ' 2,012 731,094
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 213,238 32 9,635 203,637
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,608,212 433 5,607,780
Computer Replacement Fund 341,672 341,672
Risk Management Fund 2,821,502 10,569 60,972 2,771,100
Trust & Aqenc¥ Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,113,632 174,902 5,037 31,283,495
Fire Pension Fund 32,355,235 179,811 5,500 32,529,546
Flexcomp Trust Fund 15,615 8,407 14,488 9,534
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,495,795 33,747 20,436 1,509,106
Benefit Trust Funds 75,405 75,409
102,208,641 4,428~227 1,364,804 t05,272,064
RE~ONT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:i7 RUN: THURSDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE 1
RELEASE ID :
VILIAGE OF I~OUN~ PROSPECT
I~INT OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRC~ NARCH 01 2001 TO MARCH 15 200I
DEHT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ANOONV
00t
02557 Alii, INC. NRINTREANCE CONTRACT I65.00
MAINTEMANCE AGREEMENT 217.02
MAINTENANCE 260.00
TONER 276.00
918.82
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TERIAL CO. BI, DO MATLS 16.70
BLDG MATLS 195.36
212.06
01367 AIM~S M~ERSHIP t0.00
01227 AIR ONE EQUIPMAh~, INC. NRA RACE PIECES-NEW HIRE 1176.00
01246 AIRGA8 NORTH CENTRAL C~YGEN 39,55
04546 ALPINE RAi~RA CO. CA~RE REPAIR 169.95
05222 ANEEICAN INDUSTRIAL URIFORE RENTAL 1t6.47
UNIFOR14 RENTAL 11I. 65
220.t2
01700 ANERITECH SHIPPING & HANDLING 8.50
01830 ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO..~ MAINTENANCE 160.63
01833 ANDERSON LOCK C~EANY LOCK BOXES 90.45
RE¥S 7.00
97.40
01994 ANANREK REFRESk'"~ENT SERVICES COFFEE 88.30
02167 ARAUN ROAD CONSTRUCTION JAN/KB INV'S 3804.60
JAN/RRB INV'B 274.60
3779.20
02270 AT&T ACCT,0207244120002 2.96
ACCT#0207244120002 9.83
ACCT#0207244120002 19.66
ACCT,0207244120002 9.03
ACCT,0207244120002 37.30
ACCT#0207244120002 9.83
ACCT,0207244120002 14.74
ACCT,0207244120002 25.56
ACCT,0207244120002 7.86
ACCT,0207244120002 7.86
ACCT,0207244120002 35.39
ACCT,0207244120002 199.84
ACCT#0207244120002 195.61
ACCT#0207244120002 125.82
REPORT: APBOARDRNT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 REN: THURSDAY MARLS01 12:35 PAGE 2
RELLARE ID :
VILLAGE OF 14OUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEN BOAPJ) OF TRUSTEES FROM MARCH 01 2001 TO MARCH 15 2001
REPT VENDOR RAN VENDOR NAME IFVOICE RESCRI~TIUN AMOUNT
701.84
05753 ATI~%NTIC PROMOTIONS, INC. SCREEN SET UP CHARGE 959.97
05044 AVIS RENT A CAR NTSTEN UNIT LLARE RENTAL 659.69
02405 B & H PHOTO/VIDEO ELECTRO-VOICE 209.05
05437 BEST ACCESS SYSTENS SERVICE 34.22
02795 BESTBOFL LNRqCE REI~U~E EXPENSE 29.94
05756 BI-CORP BACKGROUND CHECK 79.90
05640 B~CK BLA~ SYSTEMS, INC. REpLACENENT CD 80.00
02924 BOCA INTEUNATIONA~ INC. REFERENCE MATERIAL 50.00
05784 UOERE, IRENE OVERPAYMENT 24.00
05774 BUNNOTREE CORP. SPECIALTY VEST 30.40
04551 BUFFALO, PRILLIP EXPENSES 105.85
05775 BURKE, MR & MP~q REBATE 175.00
01000 BUNSE'S FLORAP, S & GIF1S FLORARS-POVLDOK'S RNTIRENENT 102.00
FLORAL ARRANGENENTS 101.00
203.00
01019 CAL~NT PHOTOGRAPHIC, INC. BATTERIES 607.39
01010 CARUN BUSINESS DOLNTDONS-CBNTRAL OFFICE SUPPLIES 255.60
COPIER MAINT CONTRACT t200.00
COPIENMAIRT CONTRACT 1200.00
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 802.02
3457.70
01049 CDM GOVERATiENT, INC MS STARTER KIT 300.99
SCSI CABLE 115.49
416.48
05772 CHAMPION CHENICAL CO. GRAFFITI SIGN CLEANER 387.66
05761 CHANDLER, ROBERT W, OVERPAYRANT 24.00
01069 CHEN RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLRANING SUPPLIES 190.45
CLBANING SUPPLIES 165.35
CLRAHING SUPPLIES I65,35
CLEANING SUPPLIES I65.37
FLOOR FINiSHiNG & CLEANING 1961.52
FLOOR FINISHING ~ CLEANING 302.85
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GF~ERATRD: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: TEU~BAY ~%R1501 12:85 PaGE 3
~LFASE ID :
VILLAGE OF M~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILAS P~ED TO T~E BO~ OF TRUSTEES R~ ~CH 01 200I TO ~CH 15 2001
...................................................................................................................................
DE~ ~R ~R ~N~R N~ I~OICE DESC~I~
.......................................................................................................... . ........................
2950.89
05764 CHLIK, J~S C. O~RPA~NT 24.00
01102 CITI~K, N.A. AOL-SERVICE 21.95
05781 C~, BOB ~I~URS~ 32.00
01118 CLE~ OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL ~R - 030801 700.00
PAYROLL FOR - 030801 190.00
890.00
05779 C~.~ FI~ ACC~DITATI~ I~'L AG~CY ~E 250.00
00309 C~NEY, NILLI~ J. COLOR COPIES 89.10
05503 CRYST~ R~.&~INT~CE SERVICES 14580.00
01223 DAILY OF~CE PRODU~S OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.75
OFFICE SUPPLIES 108.20
i26.95
05061 DATIVE TECHNOL~IES BILLING ~R A~C~P 129.00
05153 DIA~IC C~NI~TI~S CORP. ~PS UPDATES 1250.00
05782 ~BEK, RICHARD ~PENSES 33.00
05030 ~N CO,OPTION ~ ~E 264.00
01377 ~DE~L ~P~SS CORP ~D ~ SERVICE 78.50
00102 FI~ PENSION ~D PAYROLL DR - 030801 14439.08 _
01475 GEN~ BINDING CORPO~TION ~INATING JAC~TS 148.82
01051 ~ SIGNS, INC. PARTS 1536.00
0t558 ~SEN ~S~IATE$ MO~HLY SERVICE 4!3.90
~THLY SERVICE 246.81
~ONTHLY SERVICE 100 ~00
760.71
01~76 HELLER L~ER CO. BL~ SUPP 51.07
04580 HODGE, BOB ~PAI~ 1233.25
04934 HOE~RT, PAUL ~ND-RET DI~ER 60.00
01609 HOLY F~ILY ~EDICAL CENTER P~-~PLO~E~ SERVICE 423.00
p~-~4PLOY~ENT PHYSICkLS ~!4.00
837.00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 ENP 00 07:17 REN: TEU~DAY MAR1501 12:38 PAGE 4
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOEN~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRO~ MARCH 01 2001 TO MARCH 16 2001
DEF1 ~'.,NPOR NBR V~NDOR NAIVE INVOICE DESCRIKION AROUt~
01610 NO{~E DEPOT INV000622-i020877 80.83
INV000074-TlI0112 i7.94
98.77
01648 IBBOTSON HEATING CO. REFUND 54.00
00107 ICPiA RETIPJR~E~ TNUST - 457 PAYROLL FOE - 030801 17116.91
01665 ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CODE ENFONCE ANNUAL MEMBBRSEIP 75.00
01874 ILLINOIS DEENNTMENTOF PUBLIC ~NUAL LICENSE RENNNAL 100,00
00108 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVERUE PAYROLL FOR ~ 022301 78.96
PAYROLL POR - 030801 17213.38
PAYROLL FOR- 031501 1228.57
VOID KOTIAEZ SICK IRC. CHECK 189.21-
18331.70
01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. PAPER 1434.10
01122 ILLINOIS STATE DISBU~E~ENT UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 030801 519.23
PAYROLL FOE- 030801 195.50
PAYROLL FOE - 030801 126.00
PAYROLL FOR- 030001 60.00
PAYROLL FUR - 030801 520.75
1421.48
01712 ILLINOIS STATE POLICS BACKGPOEND CHECK 108.00
01724 INI{~ELL SUPPLIES 15.00
03942 INTERMEDIA CO~4UNICATFUNS INVENEN~T SERVICE 1389.61
01896 J.C. LICETCORENNY PAINT SUPP 223.14
00353 J~ONIS, MICHAEL E. LENCE/~TG. 22.60
SUPPLIES POLICE 59.50
82.10
01767 J~S PUBLISHING SUBSCRIPTION 27.97
01775 JKL CONSULT. CIVIL ENGRS, LTD. ENGINEERING SEEVPCES 9586.92
01783 JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS RENEWAL 25.00
01794 ~LE UNIFU~S, INC. GEAR BAGS 2032.25
BODY AREOE F.RANS 1!58.00
BODY AP~DR 385.00
BODY A~EN 770.00
4342.25
05787 RARECKI, KENNETH P~FUHD 100.00
REEORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: i SEP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE 5
~ELFASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUN~ EROSEECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESUNTED TO THE EONS) OF TRUSTEES
F~UNI~CE 01 200i TO~CH 15 2001
DE~T VENDOR ~R ~N~R N~ I~OICE DESC~I~ ~OU~
~1827 ~EIN, THO~E ~D ~NKINS,LTD. SERVICES ~NDE~D 21123.00
04590 ~R, ROBERT P. LINE D~CE 320.00
~1872 ~OF UN~OAET, INC. ~PAIR ~S-FI~ 18.00
01881 5~T~ T~L GRIP, INC. CL~HING 1273.82
CL~ING 18.00
1291.82
05744 nI~I, NICK ~INATION ~GIST~TION 96.00
01897 5I~SIST 5UIDSHIELD SP~SH GUAD 290.60
00379 AtNDELOF, C~LES M. CL~HING ALL~CE 96.27
01922 LY~ P~VEY C~P~ TEC~NICI~SUPPLIES 449.75
05757 ~SS~, MI~ ~IMB~ 96.00
04014 ~ILB~S ETC. S~IPPING CHARGES 35.61
01941 ~LCO~,JOHN ~EENSES 320.38
05747 ~G~LE, ~INIC O~RPA~E~ 24.00
05755 ~CK P~SS INC. ~ H~DING GRP~IC FI~ 85.00
01988 MCH~RY CO~Y COLLEGE S~INAR 50.00
02241 MCLEOD USA/ONE STOP C~ICATIONS ACCT~lS0030001447 322.47
ACCT~150030001447 426.12
AC~150030001447 16.34
ACCT~lS0030001447 16.35
ACCTg150030001447 26.11
ACCT~150030001447 87.04
AC~915003000t447 i74.09
ACCT~lS0030001447 87.04
ACCT%150030001447 330.77
ACCT~150030001447 87.04
ACCT~lS0030001447 i30.57
ACCTg150030001447 226.32
ACCT~150030001447 69.64
ACCT~t5003000t447 69.64
ACCT~lS0030001447 313.36
ACCT~lS0030001447 1767.01
ACC~150030001447 1732.19
ACCT~150030001447 1114.17
6996.27
05709 ~]~DEELECTRICCO. INC. ~BOREQUIPME~ 1295.00
05021 MENARDS MISC.TWLS 42.66
REPORT: ARBOREDRPT GENERATED: 1 SNT 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE 6
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BORED OF TRUSTEES FROMM ARCH 01 2001 TO MARON 15 2001
DENT VENDOR NBR FEN~R NAME IRVOIUE DEHCRI~ION ~OUMT
00116 ~TRO FEDERAL CREDIT ONION PAYROLL FOR - 030801 830.00
05371 METRO TRANSPORTATION GRONP, INC. PRO~SSIONAL SERVICES 915.25
00117 ~TROPOLITANALLIRECE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR- 030801 552.00
02826 MICHAEL WAGNER & SONS, INC, REPAIR PRETS 29.55
02034 MILLER, JAENS EXPENSES 33.00
04785 MIN, DDKKI OVERPAYMENT 24.00
02046 MOBILE PRINT INC. PROPERTY INTENTORY REPORTS 500.69
BUSINESS CARDS 27.00
ENiD PADS 43,34
VILLIGE LETTERBEAD 235,03
~DITATIONRENORTS 774.49
1580.58
02057 MORTON ARBORETUM REGISTRNTION FEE 70.00
BROCEURES-LERELNTS 57.00
127.00
02067 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOC. APRIL HMTS 3333.33
02110 NATIONAL AREUMIST ASSN. SUPPORT SYSTEMS 30.50
00123 NATIONWIDE PAYROLL FOR- 030801 16862.94
05786 NENRT REGISTRATION 425.00
02155 NENTEL CCI~4UNICATIONS SERVICE 2/i8-3/17 296.99
SERVICE 2/18-3/17 109.20
SERVICE 2/18-3/17 108.35
SERVICE 2/18-3/17 364.78
SERVICE 2/18-3/17 151.81
SEtNTCE 2/18-3/17 t39.33
SERVICE 2/18-3/17 411.94
SERVICE 2/18-3/17 207.12
SERVICE 2/i8-3/17 68.64
SERVICE 2/18-3/17 343.13
ACT~0005337520-0 320.87
MONTHLY STATEMENT 158.88
DIGIT~ PHONE SERVICE 160.66
ACT~0005327297-7 306.01
3147.71
02189 NORTBWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED-APRIL 28122.34
SERVICES RENDERED-AREIL 7030.58
35152.92
02193 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY BLEC SUPP 50.26
BLEC SUPP 34.58
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: TEOREDAF MARIL01 12:35 PAGE
RELEASE ID :
VIL~GE OF MO{INT PEUNPE~
LIST OF BILLS ERESENVED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM ~CE 01 2001 TO ~CE 15 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR V~NDOR N~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
ELEC SUPP I88.23
273.07
02199 NORTEWEST STATIONENS INC. CARTRIDGES 419.70
OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.80
OFFICE SUPPLIES 95.03
OFFICE SUPPLIES 66.81
OFFICE SUPPLIES 109.07
OFFICE SUPPLIES 88.83
799.44
05124 NORTB~STERN UNIVERSITY REGISTER-K.LEE 950.00
SCHOOL OF POLICE STAFF 30.00
980,00
02220 OA~ON PAVILLION BRA~THCARE HOM~ RELIV~RED M~LS 1550.00
04668 P.F. PETTIBONE & CO. BINDERS 297.35
05517 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS SERVICE 239,20
02256 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. BID NOTICE-STOMP REXOVALS 28.28
05760 PALATINE TOASTMASTERS ¥~LXBUNSHIP RENEWAL 58,00
05509 PETER F.OLRSEN AND A~SDO. 'TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS 1650.00
02304 PETTY CASE - POLICE DEPT. MISCELk~NEO~S EXPUNSRS 297.83
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 10.30
MISCELLAREOUS EXPENSES 5.31
MISCELLAMEOUS EXPENSES 25.05 -
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 31.75
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 9.00
379.24
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPP 32.41
TRAVEL & SUPP 21.00
TRAVEL & SUPP 1,07
TRAVEL & SOPP 18.50
TRAVEL & SUPP 27.07
100.05
00124 POLICE PENSION FUND PAYROLL ~OR - 030801 17814.37
04921 POPE, ELIZABETH A. PAYROLL FOR - 030801 923.08
02352 PRINCETOM TEC Fk~SHLITES 317.37
FLASELITES 16.00
333.37
REFUNT: REBOAP, DRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: TRERSDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE
~,ELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEOT
LIST OF BILLS PRERE~ED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FEOM MA~CH 01 2001 TO MARCH 15 2001
DEPT VF~NDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNV
05605 PRINT TUREAROEMD INC. NEMSL~TER PRINTING 5913.00
02358 PROSAEMTY FIRST AID SUPP 123.70
02379 QUILL CORPOMATION SUPPLIES 39.99
OFFICE SUPPLIES 138.00
FEI~TER CARTRIDGES 177.84
355.83
02380 QUINLAN PUBLISHING CUNPANY REFERENCE MATERIAL 74.78
01191 R.L. CORTY & COMPANY SUPPLIES 164.21
02393 RAY O'HEREON CO.,INC. D~TY HRLMA~S 640.70
RETIi{EME~ BADGE ID CASE 88.00
REMINGTON SHOTGUNS 1258.05
1986.75
02396 RAYMARK OFFICE PROD & F~k~ POLICE 9320999 8.67
FIRE 932100 371.60
POLICE 9320999 684.05
1064.32
05763 RC CONSTRUCTION REFUND 50.00
02408 REID A~D ASSOCIATES, JOHN E. PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 175.00
POLYGRAPH EXAMS 350.00
525.00
02467 REUSE-RkNDNURST SHOP CENT,INC. APRIL RENT 2000.00
00421 RO~, ROSFELT RECOGNITION PA~TY 75.45
02484 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION SERVICE GU~ CLEANING SYSTEM 108.85
SERVICE t12.85
221.70
04673 sa~ BERNAREINO COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAEMENTS PAYROLL FOR - 030801 92.30
05768 SCEMIOT, MARFEETN RE~PND 36.00
05769 SCNWASS, AUDREY ~EAL RSRATE REBATE 538.00
02515 SCEMEPPE & SONS COFFEE SUPPLIES 167.52
KITCHEN SUPPLIES 604.23
771.75
02~24 SEARS HDWE SUPP 149.88
00125 RE!U LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 030B01 456,00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY MARl§U1 12:38 PAGE
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
UN~MRECE 01 200I TO MRECE 15 2001
DRST VENDOR NRE VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02542 SHEEP PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL SERVICE 295.00
05790 SNELLING DATA ENTRY SERVICES 489.00
02604 SPYDRECO INC. ACCESSORIES 292.96
04139 STANARD ~ ASSOCIATES CANDIDATE TESTING 700.00
PRE-REPLOYivlENT TESTING 700.00
I400.00
02627 STEINRE ELECTRIC COMPANY CIRCUIT BREAKERS 631.58
02632 STERLING CODIFIERS, INC. SUPPLEMENT #6 2889.00
03028 STEVENS, JAMES E. REFUND 100.00
08770 STOMAN, MILAN OVERPAYMENT 24.00
02658 SUBURBAN PRESS EVVELONES PRINTED 99.00
04777 SUPERDAWG DRIVE IN CATERING 303.78
05762 SURLAS, PIOTR REFUND CAR SOLD 36.00
02670 REIDREREI ELECTRONICS INC. RENTAL OF VIDEO EQUIREANT 340.00
02672 SYSTRES FORES, INC. ENVELOPES 624.75
02679 TEE JAY SERVICE CO~PARY, INC. PRESS ~LL SWITCH 93.00
· PRESS WALL SWITCH 127.25
220.25
02680 TBLETRAC, INC. SERVICE 1213.95 _
05789 TEE SATIN APPLE COSTREE FOR PUBLIC WO~S 600.00
01291 TNTSSRE DOVER ELEVATOR ~INTREANCE-ELEVATOR 196.29
02722 TRI-STATE ELECTRONIC CORE INV41978/41560/qlTU4 38.93
02723 TRITON ELECTRONICS, INC. RADAR NEPAIRS 420.75
02749 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES ANNUAL 5~INTANAMCE 800.00
02756 N~ITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ACT#06983947 3000.00
00127 UNITED NAY PAYROLL FOR - 030801 309.85
02767 UN-MADISUB COURUB~9768 895,00
02779 V.I.P. AWARDS & ENGRAVING ENGRAVING 22.80
05783 VALENTINE, PAUL EXPENSES 47.00
05766 VASILIAS, $TAVROS OVERPAY~IENT 24.08
REFO~T: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP O0 07:17 RUN: T~R~OAY MA~{1501 12:35 PAGE
R~LRASB ID '
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOLD Of TRUSTEES FR~RCE 01 2001 TO~A~CH 15 200]
DE~T ~NDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
...................................................................................................................................
05004 ~ERIZO~ WIRELESS PAGER SERVICES 1220.01
02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 241.18
00128 'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR- 030901 16928.90
PATROLLFOR - 030801 29.96
16958.86
04314 VILLAGE OF MO~T PROSPECT - PAYROLL WI~S PAYROLL FOR - 022301 401.70
PAYROLL FOR - 022301 61.10
PAYROLL FOR- 022301 49,63
PAYROLL FOR - 030801 139295,26
PAYROLL FOR - 030801 15605.78
PAYROLL FOR- 030801 12676.11
PAYROLL FOR - 031501 9865.62
PAYROLL FOR - 031501 1384.25
FAYROLL FOR - 031501 1124.40
VOID KOTLARZ SICK INC. CHECK 1443.34-
179020.51
02821 VON BRIESEN,FURTELL&ROPER,S.C. FEES-SERVICE 13226.73
02832 WAI~ART STO~S, INC. MISC SUPP 85.79
02835 WA~HOUSE DIRECT SUPPLIES 98.10
SUPPLIES 19.44
SUPPLIES 137.70
SUPPLIES 74.89
MIBC OFFICE SUPPLIES 227.47
557.60
02843 WAVEPRIN~ING SUPPLIES 51.00
PRINTING 223.00
274.00
02876 WILK8, IKVANA RE~gND-~T.DINNER 60.00
05746 WISCTF PAYROLL FOR - 030801 503.07
02893 WOLF CA~I~, INC. PBOSESSING 86.59
PROCESSING 35.04
SPECTra CA~E~, 99.95
PROSESSING 44.95
pROCESSING 43.96
POLAROID CAME~ 99.95
410.44
05776 WOLF, PHYLLIS REBATE 385.00
05410 WOBLDCOMWIRELESS, INC. 1/6/01-2/5/01 58.29
SERV1/6-2/5/01 59.89
REPORT: APBOANDRFT GREERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE 11
RELEASE ID :
VIL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF DILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MARCH 01 2001 TO MARCH 1S 2001
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1/6/01-2/05/01 70.07
CELLULAR SERVICE 16.61
SERVICE 31.50
236.36
05248 XFEDXSTORES DIVISION SUPPLIES 26.45
TOTAL 473208.68
O30
01639 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK TIPPING FEES 73094.12
FIXED COSTS 41597.20
114691.32
02270 AT&T ACCT#0207244120002 3.93
02241 MCLEOD USA/UNE STOP COAMUNICATIONS ACCT#150030001447 34.82
TOTAL 114730.07
O5O
01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT. 700.00
05614 DETROIT SALTOO. ROAD SALT 14520.47
TOTAL 15220.47
510
51071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BLDGMATLS 21.90
02405 B & H PHOTO/VIDEO VIDEOREID 1632.10
05780 FLOORING SOLUTIONS INC. PURCHASE & INSTALLATION 4745.91
05754 INSIGHT MICROSOFT OFRICE2000 40890.52
01896 J.C. LICHT COMPANY PAINT SUPP 149.29
05256 NIOOR ACT~1357621505 33.09
02193 NORTH~ST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELEC SUFR 168.09
04432 SPOT, JOHN PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 108.00
02627 $TEINER ELECTRIC COMPAMY PARTS 188.67
TOTAL 47937.57
550
04124 ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES REMOVAL OF CONTAMINATED SOIL 30935.50
REMOVAL OF CONTAN!NATED SOIL 132359.74
REMOVAL OF CONTAMINATED SOIL 152278.55
REMOVAL UNDERGROUND TANK 3936.72
319510.5I
REPORT: AP~ARDR~ GRVE~TED: 1 SEE 00 07:17 R~N: THDRS~Y ~R1501 12:35 PAGE 12
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MORVT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRERENTED TO THE BOAP, D OF TRUSTEES RVO~ ~ARCH 0I 2001 TO ~ARCH 15 2001
DE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR NRVE INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~DO~T
01791 K-PLUS ENVIRORVENTAL, INC. SERVICES 1200.00
05777 V3 INFRASTRUCTURE SENVICES NUPPLE~NTAL AG~RVRVT 1888.08
TOTAL : 322598.59
610
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TREIAL CO. BLDG ~TLS 11.98
B5~ ~ATLS 89.98
101.96
05222 k~ERICAN INDUSTRIAL CLEANING 116.48
CLEARING 111.66
228.14
01780 k~E~ITECH PHONE SERVICE 47.50
01833 ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY LOCKS 394.56
01973 ARVA CHICAGO RVT~O C~APTER DO~SEY/ARDLER/GATRVS 75.00
05628 ARCHON CONSTRUCTION CO.INC. CONTRACTUAL REPAIRS 11556.00
04964 ARJO INC. REFUND 11.40
02270 AT&T ACCT#0207244120002 262.45
05773 BAXTER & WOODSMAN, INC. REGISTk%TION FEE 30.00
05749 BLAIR HOUSE, INC. RE~D 79.07
REFUND 8.25
87.32
02937 BO~N HARDWARE CO PL~BING REPAIR PARTS 35.55
01610 HO~E DEPOT INV000575-0011092 32.80
01622 HOWELL TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO. PARTS 2384.80
01896 J.C. LICHT C~PANY PAINT SUPP 233.42
01946 ~&~NAGL~ENT CONCEPTS SEWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS 3193.48
02241 ECLDOD USA/ONE STOP CC~IUNICATIONS ACCT~lLD030001447 1624.52
ACCT~lL0030001447 2324.10
3948.62
05750 MILLAN, B~DLEY D. REFUND 2.39
~E~ND 0.24
2.89
REPORT: APBOAEDR~T GHKERAVED: 1 SEP 00 07:17 RUN: TRDRSDAY MARLS01 12:35 PAGE I3
REL~RE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT pROSpECT
LIST OF HILI~ PRESi~RD TO THE BOAP~) OF TRUSTE~ FROM MARCH 01 2001 TO ~RCH 15 2001
DER VENDOR NRE VENDOR Nm INVOICE DRSCRIF~IOM ~OUNT
02042 Mlif~D~ PRESS LETTERHEAD 840.00
05340 MORGAN, D~AN REIMBURS~ 05.00
05701 MUSTO, J~i~ES REFUMD 20.10
REFUND 2.10
22,20
02155 NEXYEL CO~ONZCATIOMS SERVICE 2/18-3/17 380.68
02193 NORTH~ST ELECfRICA~ SUPPLY ELEC SUPF 831,33
HLEC SOUP 31.1I
ELEC SUPH 80.65
943.09
02300 PETTY CASH - P~BLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPP 6.45
TRAVEL & SUPU 5.17
11.62
02358 FROSA~TY FIRST AID SUEP 123.70
05752 REDDY, NBBURI R~FUND 26.80
~F~ND 2.80
29.60
02962 REDWOOD APT. PARTNERS OVERRA~ENT 30.02
OVERPA¥~ 3.15
33.67
02008 ROGER MEYER & SON DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS 6650.06
DISPOS~ OF DEBRIS 2742.96
9393.02
02624 STATE TREASURER ANNHA~ MATER TESTING 4785.00
02627 STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY CIRCUIT BREAKERS 115.92
04838 THIRD MILLENNIUM ASSOC.INC. SERVICE 2/I6 & 03/01/0i 1702.49
02773 U.S. BARF TRUST MATER 105072.00
poMER 11601.00
O & M 19983.00
FIXED 94376.00
231030.00
02775 USA BLUEBOOK PARTS 102.57
01522 9LW. GRKINRER INC. SHUTTER MOTOR 57.86
02035 ~ARKHOUSE DIRECT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 227.47
REPORT: REBOARERPT GENERATED: 1 KHP 00 0T:17 RUN: TEUREDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE 14
RELEASE ID :
VILIAGE OF M(SNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRO~ ~ROE 01 2001 TO MARCH I5 200i
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
...................................................................................................................................
02839 WATER ENVREUNi~ENT ~EDKE~TION ME~RERSHIP RENEWAL 87.00
TOTAL : 272596.48
63O
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TERIAL CO. ELDG ~TLS 42.37
02754 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LAND LEASE 1989.91
TOTAL : 2012.28
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TERIAL CO. ELDG ~ATL$ 28.T9
01187 AETNA TRUCE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 384,45
E~RE REFILLS 39.60
BENDIX BREKE PARTS 68.97
493.02
02270 AT&T ACCT'0207244120002 14.74
05770 BUCKHORN FU~PS PIMP REPAIR 404.44
01289 DODOk%S TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 537.47
CRC BRAKH CLEAN 420.00
957.47
01511 GOODYEAR SERVICE STOR~S TIRES 538.08
01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. REPAIR PTS-P.M 1501.00
REPAIR PTS-P.W 126.00
1717.00 -
01920 LYNCH AUTO GROUP TRANSMISSION FILTER & GASKET 103.59
02241 NCLEOD USA/ORE STOP CO~UNICATDONS ACCT~150030001447 130.58
04416 NSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. REPAIRS 395.93
02155 NEXTEL COI~f0NICATIONS SERVICE 2/18-3/17 148.07
02648 P.P,. STREICN & SONS, INC. REPAIR 262.50
02874 PARTS PLUS OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS REPAIR PARTS 10.98
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC ?lORES TRAVEL & SUPP 22.39
T~VEL & SUPP 64.66
87.05
02336 POWER EQ~iPMEH? LEASING CO P~PA!RE
02358 ~ROSAFETY SAFETY EQUIPMENT 85.00
P, EPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RU~: TEUREOA¥ MAR150! 12:35 PaGE 15
~RARO ID :
VILLAGE OF MO{~N~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TNE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ ~{ARCE 01 2001 TO MARCH 15 2001
DER VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02575 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL CABLE S~ 226.96
04101 SPI DISTRIBOTION INC. NEL P~PS 128.84
02661 SUB,REAR TR~ & GLASS CO. REPAIR 1996 CREV~{OLET 128.50
02792 TRI-STATE ELECTRONIC CORE BOOT RETAIRER KIT 131.66
02769 UPTOAN ARTO SUPPLY AC DELCO DISTRIBUTOR 232.02
05004 VERIZON WIRELESS PAGING SERVICE 45.01
02861 ~EST SINE TRACTOR SALES R~PAIR PARTS 295.82
02870 ~OROSALE DIRECT INC. Tk~ILER HITCNES 274.86
TOTAL : 9634.68
670
02525 SECRETARY OF STATE LICRESE PLATE STICKER 78.00
02870 ANOROSALE DIRECT INC. TRAILER HITCHES 354.56
TOTAL 432.56
690
01460 ARTHUR J. GA~LAGHER RISK M~. INSURANCE CO~(~ISSION 1500.00
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. INS CLAIMS-CAB 24685.00
INS CLAIMS-GRO 6200.44
30885.44
01306 DRUG CARD, INC. PRESC.CARD CLAIMS 9549.25
PROSCRIPTION 13724.85
23274.10
05788 ERD~f~N, ~ORKTTA TRIP & FALL-GLASSES REPLACS 35.08
0145i GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC. CLAIMS A~IN Ct%RGES 5277.00
TOTAL 60971.54
710
02637 BECKER, BURKE ASSOCIATES INC POLICE PENSION 5000~80
02565 SKLODOWSKLPUCHALSKI & ROIMER LEGAL FEES 37.50
TOTAL 5037.50
720
02637 BNCROR, BURKE ASSOCIATES !NC FIRS PENSION 5000.00
05539 COLLINS, CARY J., P.C LEGAL RETAINER 2Q 500.00
REPORT: APBOARDEXT G~REATEX: 1 SEP O0 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE t6
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOONV PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MARCH 0I 2001 TO MARCH 15 2001
OMPT VENDOR NBR VLNDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIPTION ANOMNT
TOTAL :
770
02513 ABEEXNTt{Y, JANET T. hEX COMP 392.36
01042 ADAMCZTK, TED D. ROUX COMP 152.78
01867 EXDLER, GLRN R. 5gX COMP 314.60
02573 HAAS, WILL E. FLEX COMP 600.00
02921 BLDE, }~ICHREL FLEX COM? 416.68
02948 BROMEXR, ILAMA FL~X COMP 229.00
02949 BROUBREAU, AMW~ J. FLEX COMP 318.89
01094 CREISTENSEN, RICHARD FLEX COMP 141.97
01224 DALEY, JAMICE A. RDEX COMP 51.86
01241 DAWSON, HENRY C. FLEX COMP 135.70
01297 D~FFONE, RICHARD L. F~EX COMP 107.71
01405 FIRST CO~ONWEALTH EMRDOYEE-DENTA~ PLaN 1905.67
05275 FOEHRIRO, WILLIAM FL~X COMP 2789.00
01484 GIBSON, ROBERT J. hEX COMP 439.95
01540 GUENTEEW, JAMES E. FLEX COMP 599.24
01557 HAMREXAN, nESTER a. FLEX COMP 138.00
04728 HOSKINSOM, THOMAS FLEX COMP 230.00
01625 HUEMAMN, ANTHONY FLEX COMP 582.99
04729 IPSEN, BRIAN FLEX COMP 271.16
01836 ROTLARZ, ANTHONY J. FLEX COMP 106.00
01852 ~BEE, Ak{N 5. 5~ COMP 637.97
05362 LOMBARDO, CYNTHIA FLEX COMp 138.48
01905 LOWE, VEOMA W. FLEX COMP 47.13
05757 MAGNUSSEN, MIKE FLEX COMP 290.00
01942 MALCOOM, JOHN J. FLEX COMP 178,00
02017 MIRDLETOM, JOAN FLEX COMP 156.89
05758 MINARCIK ANTHONY FLEX COMp 541.7i
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 SBP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY MARl501 12:35 PAGE t7
RELRARN ID :
VILLAGE OF MORN~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESRNTRD TO TRN BOARD OF TRDSTRNS RNO~ HARCB 01 2001 TO HARCN 15 2001
DEPT ~DOR NBR %%~NIX)R Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION RNOUNT
02054 MORGAN, NANCELON M. 5EX CONP 79.75
02480 RSRDECKI, ROBERT L. ~EX CC~P 002.50
04160 SKINDINGREUNE SCO~T F~EX C~P 8.00
02644 STRANL, DAVID 5EX CUNB t18.14
02710 TRACE, RICNARD L. ~EX CC~P 409.00
02853 WERDERtTCH, RANDALL C. 5EX C~B i159.30
TOTAL 14488.43
790
05624 BERTRNL LEWIS ELECT. REFUND 500.00
02945 BRISTOL COURT BAVLOCK RET. DINNER 6844.00
00121 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SAVINGS BONDS 250.00
05765 RDL~ING, GLORIA DUPLICATE PAYMENT 36.00
02071 MOUN~ PROSPECT POLICE ASSOC. RDIMB DINNER DEP/RING 639.95
01719 NCRNRS GROUP LIFE P~I~ FOR MONTH-FUB. 327.00
05767 NINE ~ST GROUP, INC. OVRAPAYHEN? 121,80
05740 RISK MJ~AGRN~d~T ALTERNATIVES OVERPAYMENT 43.75
02689 TBIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND HONEY 1073.00
BOND HONEY 1446.00
BOND HONEY 4038.00
BOND HONEY 1700.00
9107.00
05771 ZGRABLJIC, D~GO REFUND 2566.00
TOTAL 20435.58
GRAND TOTAL 136480~..43
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 1 REP 00 07:17 RUN: THURSDAY MAR1501 12:35 PAGE 18
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM ~RCH 01 2001 TO ~CH i5 2001
5%%~ARE BY FUND
001 GENERAL ~UND 473208.68
030 REFUSE DISPOSA~ F~ND 114730.07
050 MOTOR ~EL TAX FIND 15220.47
510 CAPITAL I/~PROVE~ENT F~ND 47937.57
550 ~T~ ~DEVL~ CONST 322598.59
610 WATER ~D SE~R ~D 272596.48
630 PA~ING SYST~ ~VE~E ~ND 2012.28
660 VEHICLE RIP.CE ~D 9634.68
670 ~HICLE ~P~C~E~ ~ND 432.56
690 RISK ~AG~ ~ND 60971.54
710 POLICE PENSION ~D 5037.50
720 FI~ PENSION ~ND 5500.00
770 ~EXCOMP ESCROW ~D 14488.43
790 ESCROW DEPOSIT ~ND 20435.58
T~A5: 1364804.43
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET REVENUE
&
EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES
January l ~February28, 2001
03 07,2001 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months ~6.6%, Completed
17:56:44 10 Months ( 83.3% ) Remaining
Budget Revenue Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cux MO Y-T~D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budge~ Balance Percent
REVENUE ~Y CLASSIFICATION
PROPERTY TAXES 1,074,528 1,126,982 I0,101,003 8,974, 081 88.8
OTMER TAXES -412 862 734,740 17,626,375 16,891 635 95~8
LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 391,751 828,846 3,085,900 2,557,054 82.9
INTERGOVERMENT REV. -367.791 149,382 10.643,066 10,493,684 98,6
CHARGES FOR SERVICE 994,967 1,981,834 12,867,980 10,886,146 84.6
FINES AND FORFEITS '1,597 46,127 510,000 463 873 91.0
INVESTMENT INCOME 385,588 831,423 5,335,687 4,504,264 84.4
REIMBURSEMENTS 28,958 46,853 866,656 519,803 91.7
OTHER REVENUE 238,51~ 438,700 3,144.308 2,705 608 86.0
OTMER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 17,351,970 17,351.970 100.0
Total All F%~lds 2,382,060 5,884,827 81,232,945 75,348,118 92.8
o3~o7~2oo~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6%, Completed
k7:56:44 10 Months 83.3% ~ Remalni~
Budget Revenue Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
Total All Funds 2,332,060 5,884,827 81,232,948 75,348~118 92.8
03/07 200I 2 Mo~ths ~ 16.6% ) Completed
17:57:s3 10 Months 83.3% ) Remainin9
FRRBRR03 - VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM02~ Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
GENERAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 746 316 782 707 7,011,234 6.228,527 88.8
41 OTHER TAXES -843.875 291, 712 10,876 000 10.584 288 97.3
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 334,891 470,500 2,848 500 2,378 000 83.5
43 INTERGOVBRMENT REV. -385 110 4,117 8,209,440 8,208,323 99,9
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 41,908 109.440 673 652 564 212 83.8
45 FINES AND FORFEITS -1,597 46,127 510000 463 873 91.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 35,312 71 412 435 000 363,588 83.6
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 16,767 33~000 298 309 265 309 88.9
48 OTHER REVENUE 18,487 58, 030 138 675 80 645 S8.2
TOTAL GENBRAL FUND 263,299 1,867,045 28,000,810 26,133,765 93.3
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 258.497 271 101 2,431 590 2,160 489 88.9
44 C~LARGES FOR SERVICE 58,105 108~485 875.250 786,765 87.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 6 990 18,484 60 000 44 516 74.2
03/07 2001 2 Months t 16.6% ~ Completed
17:57:53 10 Months ' 83.3% Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
suMos1 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Suaunary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cuz MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percen~
TOTAL REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B 58,860 63,184 565,866 502,682 88.~
G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 i0,400 10,400 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 2,273,500 2.273.800 100.0
TOTAL G. O. SERIES 2001 DEBT SERVICE 0 0 2,293,900 2,283,900 100.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A
41 OTHER TAXES 73,918 85,868 370,000 284.132 76.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,418 2,948 21,635 18,687 88.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOW]NTOWN REDEVLOP~T B&I 1993A 75,333 88,816 391,635 302,819 77.3
DOWNTOWlq REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOW/~ REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B
41 OTMER TAXES 27,969 32,491 140,000 107,509 76.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 240 481 4,482 4,001 89.3
49 OTBER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOMNTOMN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 28,209 92,972 144,482 111,810 77.2
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B
41 OT~ER TAXES 10,588 12,300 83,000 40,700 76.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 16 24 962 938 97.5
TOTA~DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 10,604 12,324 53,962 41,638 77.2
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,753 4,536 16,164 11,628 71.9
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 300,000 300,000 100.0
TOTB.LDOWNTOWN REDHVL B & I 1999 1,753 4,556 316,164 Sll,628 98.6
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A
03/07 2001 2 Months · 16.6% ~ Completed
17:57:53 10 Mo~ths 83.3% Remaining
FRRBRR03 · VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
suM03~ Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unrecelved Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL REFUNDINO FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993~ -24,405 -7,151 285,899 298,050 102.5
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES -10,430 0 165,000 165,000 100.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 281 593 4,772 4.179 87.6
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A -10,169 593 169,772 169,179 99.7
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES -12, 715 0 205,800 305,800 t00.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 324 682 5.652 4 970 87.9
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A -12,391 682 211,452 210,770 99.7
FLOOD CONTROL - i998A B & I
41 OTEER TAXES -3,993 0 68,000 68,000 100.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 64 134 1,609 1,479 91.7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B a I -3,929 134 69,609 69,475 99.8
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I
41 OTEER TAXES 30,426 35,34~ 152,300 116 955 76.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 196 287 3,318 2,931 88.3
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 30,622 35,732 155,618 119,836 77.0
EPA FLOOD LOAN
41 OTHER TAXES -60,810 -30~405 697,000 727,405 104.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 417 914 6~761 5 847 86.5
TOTAL EFA FLOOD LOAN B&I -60,393 -29,491 703,761 733,252 104.2
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B &
Q3/07/200I 2 Months ( 16.6% ) Completed
10 Months ( 83.3% ) Remaini~
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
suM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Bud~eZ Balance Perce~t
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998k
41 OTHER TAXES -6,990 0 394,000 394,000 100.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 233 495 10,647 10,152 95.4
TOTAL STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A -6,757 495 ~04,647 404,152 99.9
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
03/07/2001 2 Months ( 16.6% ) Completed
17:57:$3 10 Months ( 83.3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 ¢ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
suM0~i Budget Revonue by.CategOry within Fund Sum.mary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
41 OTHER TA/fES -76,908 38,797 67,200 28,403 42.3
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 100.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 13,019 27.761 45,000 17,239 38.3
49 OTHER FIN~/~CING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND -63,889 66,558 1,112,200 1,045,642 94.0
WATER AND SEWER FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 165,313 173 191 1,545,900 1,272,109 88.8
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 463~059 899.136 6,092,050 5,192,914 85.2
46 I~q;ESTMENT INCOME 12,502 26,570 151,000 124,430 82.4
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 4,334 4.678 28,000 20,321 81.3
TOT~t~WATER ~ SEWER FI/ND 645,208 1,103,576 7,813,350 6,709,774 85.9
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
42 LICENSES. PERMITS & FEES 300 600 5,400 4,800 88.9
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 660,000 660,000 100.0
44 CPIARGES FOR SERVICE 14,163 28.953 176,000 147,047 83.5
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 3,314 7.089 36,000 28,911 80.3
TOT~PANKENG SYSTEM REVEN~E FL~ND 17,777 36,642 877,400 840,758 95.8
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 95,106 190,219 1,141,301 951,082 83.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 832 1.827 8,000 6,173 77.2
TOTAL%rEHICLE MAINTEWANCE FUND 95,938 192,046 1,149,301 957,255 83.3
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 68,654 133,308 799,840 666,532 83.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 24,695 52,439 280,000 227,561 81.3
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 60,000 60,000 100.0
TOTaL VEHICLE REpLAC~4ENT FUND 81,349 185,747 1,139,860 954,093 89.7
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CMARGES FOR SERVICE 9,962 19.785 117,599 97,834 83.2
46 INVEB~ENT INCOME 1,525 3,217 14,500 11,283 77.8
2 Months ' 16.6% Completed
17:57:53 10 Months / 83.3% Remaining
FRRBRR]3 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
2ur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unrecelved Unreceived
Received Received "Budget Balance Percent
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 8,389 7~013 60.000 52,987 88.3
48 OTBEE REVENUE 49.161 99,093 578,352 479.259 82.9
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FU~D 312,664 823,821 3,780,640 3,156, 919 83.5
POLICE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 106 335 207,028 1,760,000 1,552.972 88.2
48 OTNER REVENUE 81,068 138.915 1,169,601 1,030.686 88.1
TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND 187,403 945,943 2,929,601 2,583,658 85.2
FIRE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 113,929 276,925 1,900,000 1,623,075 85.4
48 OTHER REVENUE 67,338 119.853 1,122,190 1,002,827 89.3
TOTAL FIRE PENSIOE FUND 181,267 396,778 3,022,180 2,625,402 86.9
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND
48 INVESTMENT INCDME 319 697 5.000 4,303 86.1
TOTAL BENEFiT TRUST ~2 FUND 319 697 5,000 4,303 86.1
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 8,476 8,217 0 -5,217
TOTAL ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 2,476 5,217 0 -5,217
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL SSA ~1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I
41 OTHER T~{XES 4,637 4,706 38,125 33,419 87.7
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 105 228 1,500 1,272 84.8
TOTAL BSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 4,742 4,934 39,625 34,691 87.5
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,573,000 4,572,000 100.0
TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIB~/%R~ FROND 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 180.0
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% )Completed
Budget Expenditure Su/rm%ary 18 Months 83.3%, Remaining
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES 1.149,031 ~,664.081 18~832 450 16,168 369 85.9
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 363,085 676,507 5,202 344 4,525 837 87.0
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 20,592 45,582 358,900 313,318 87.3
PENSION BENEFITS 260,073 545,255 3.661.958 3,116,703 85.1
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 580,333 1,666,312 13,531,932 I1,865,520 87.7
UTILITIES -3,512 47.471 573.350 525,879 91,7
INSURANCE 246,658 E13.471 3,780.S67 3,267,196 86.4
COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -8,119 163.883 1,344.350 1,180,467 87,8
OTHER EXPENDITURES 40,402 52.441 935,106 882,665 94.4
LAND IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 100,000 100.000 100.0
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS -10,513 3,984 1,623,000 1,619,016 89.8
OFFICE EQUIPMENT 4.896 15,751 394,497 378,746 96.0
MOBILE EQUIPMENT -53,202 8,447 1,330,000 1,32t,553 99.4
OTMER EQUIPMENT -121.228 23,566 542,898 519,332 95.7
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS -99,456 0 543,700 543,700 100.0
INFI%ASTRUCTURE -95,689 42.983 11,101,660 11,058.677 99.6
BOND PRINCIPAL 12,738 44.180 3,201,880 3,157,700 98.6
INTEREST EXPENSE 6,906 189,440 1,251,762 1,062,322 84.9
BANK AND FISCAL FEES 300 600 10,830 10,230 94.5
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 641.970 641,970 100.0
Total All Funds 2,293,295 6,708,954 68,963,184 62,259,200 90.3
o~loTf~oo~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 16.6% ) completed
17:S6:20 10 Months ( 83.3% ) Remaining
Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Un~x~pended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 0 0 156,688 156,688 100.0
STREET IMPROVB & I 1998A 0 0 102,900 102,900 100.0
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND -47,377 13,285 3,528,418 3,515,133 99.6
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 725,990 0 0 0
SERIES 2001 PROJECT FIIND 0 0 960,000 960,000 100.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 0 190,666 190,666 100.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST -2,912 49,522 1,453,792 1,404,270 96.6
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND -34,858 0 3,059,460 3,059,460 100.0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FU~ -5,516 9,138 2,807,700 2,798,562 99.7
WATER ~/qD SEWER FI/ND 165,921 832,249 7,811,364 6,979,115 89.3
PARKING SYSTEM REVENI3E FUND 9,408 22,060 940,895 918,83S 97.7
VEHICLE PL~INTENANCE FUND 3S,622 137,416 1,137,389 999,973 87.9
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND -53,202 8,447 1,400,000 1,391,553 99.4
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 5,280 5,280 46,075 40,795 88.5
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 821,765 463,686 3,530,903 3,067,217 86.9
POLICE PENSION FUND 129,504 268,404 1,8%3,738 1,545,334 85.2
FIRE PENSION FUND 126,316 268,344 1,798,075 1,529,731 85.1
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND 2,960 5,920 85,525 29,605 83,3
SSA ~1 PROSPECT MEADOWS E&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 0 0 42,305 42,305 100,0
Total All Funds 2,295,295 6,703,954 68,963,154 62,259,200 90.3
2
031)7/200~ 2 Months 16.6% ) Completed
~?:87:~5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECTlO Months 83.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budge~ Expenditure Sumraary
ol/ol/ol - o2/28/ol
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 7,389 17,t49 91,870 74,721 81.3
03 ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS 852 1,757 15.~36 13,379 88.4
Totals 8,221 18,906 107,006 88,100 82.3
EXPENDITLrRE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 2.444 4,920 32,359 27,439 84.~
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 338 683 4.438 3,755 84.6
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 0 200 200 100.0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,536 11,209 60,034 48,825 81.3
55 UTILITIES -5 80 425 345 81.2
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,907 2,014 9.550 7,536 78.9
Totals 8,221 18,906 107,006 88,100 82.3
02/07/2001 2 Months 16.6% Completed
~:sT:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 MOnthS 83.3% Remaining
FRRDBR01
su~0~l Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE MANAGER' S OFFICE Expended Expended Budge~ Balance Percent
03/07/200~ 2 Months ( 16.6% Completed
~?:s?:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lo ~o~th~ B3.3~ Eemaining
FRRDBR01 .
SUMo3z Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
TV S~RVIC~S DIVISION Expended Expended Budge~ Balance Percent
03/07'2001 2 Months ls.6% Completed
~7:~7:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~o Months ~.3~ ~
FRRDBR01
SOM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Une×pended Unaxpended
VILLAGE CLERK' S OFFICE Expended Expanded BudgeE Balance Percent
03/07/2001 2 Months ~ 16.6% Completed
~v:sv:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 ~onths , 83.~ ~ Re~ni~9
FRRDBR01.
SUM0~ Department Budg'et Expenditure Sum.mary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T~D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
FINANCE DEPARTMENT E~rpende d Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/07/2001 2 Months 16.6% J Completed
~7:~7:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT l0 Months, 83.3% ~ Remalnln9
FRRDBR01
SUMO31 Department Budget Expenditure Sumuuary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 UneXpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Expended Expended Budge~ Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 15,696 30,143 186 518 156,375 83.8
02 PLkNNING & ZONING 12 131 27 436 250.517 223.081 89.0
03 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1,941 10,154 72.244 62,090 85.9
05 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 45 482 91 907 649,910 558,003 85.9
06 HOUSING INSPECTIONS 18 134 38 903 261,101 222,198 85.1
07 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 8 005 15 722 101.881 86,159 84.6
Totals 101,389 214,265 1,522,171 1,307,906 85.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 72,021 139 093 1,031,540 892,447 86,5
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 22 351 44 020 291,544 247,524 84,9
52 OTNER EMPLOYEE COSTS 2 259 - 82T 21,045 13,224 62,8
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,877 17 483 136,987 119,504 87,2
55 UTILITIES 1 525 3,E33 25,310 21,877 86,4
67 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 356 2 415 15.74B 13,330 34.7
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
Totals 101,389 214,265 1,522,171 1,307,906 85,9
BOURCE OF FUND~
001 GENEP, AL FUND 101,389 214 265 1.521,121 1,306,856 85.9
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 0 0 1,050 1.050 100.0
Totals 101,389 214,265 1,522,171 1,307,906 85.9
03/07'2001 2 Months 16.6% . Completed
~?:s?:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Mo~ths 83.3% Ne~ainin~
FRRDBR01 ·
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T~D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Expended Expended Budge~ Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
04 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 974 1,648 20,976 19,328 92.1
05 CDBG COMMUNITY pROGRAMS -870 299 53 400 53,101 99.4
06 ACCESSIBLTY & NEIGRBRHD IMPRV -2,000 0 285,000 285,000 100.0
07 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHAB -3,156 620 140 000 139,380 99.6
Totals -5,052 2,567 499,376 496,809 99.5
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 555 1.140 13 340 12,200 91.5
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 72 149 2,906 2.757 94.9
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 341 341 1 040 699 67.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -864 317 55,740 95,428 99.4
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 0 1,350 1.350 100.0
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES -3,156 620 140 000 139,380 99.6
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS -2.000 0 85.000 85,000 100.0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 200 000 200,000 100.0
Totals -5,052 2,567 499,376 496,809 99.5
SOURCE OF FUNDS
070 COMMUNITY DEVELPMIqT BLOCK GR~T -9 052 2 567 499.376 496.809 99.5
Totals -5,052 2,967 499,876 496,809 99.$
03/07/2001 2 Months ( ~6.64 Completed
~7:~7:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months . 83.3% Remaining
FRRDBRO1
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Smmmary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 unexpended unexpended
HUMAN SERVICES Expended EXpended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP, AM TOTALS
01 HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTR3~TION 9,387 20~009 168~643 148,634 88.1
02 SOCIAL SERVICES 20,817 42,12( 326,845 284 728 87.1
03 NURSING/HEALTH SERVICES 5.868 12 473 95~361 82,888 86.9
04 SENIOR 9ROGP, AMS 4,568 10.524 81,961 71 437 87.2
Totals 40,640 85,126 672,810 887,684 87.3
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
90 PERSONAL SERVICES 30.817 61.24~ 426,428 365 177 85.6
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7.969 15.916 103.698 87,782 84.7
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS -72 160 5.300 5 140 97~0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2.143 5.182 90,942 85,760 94,3
55 UTILITIES -19 1.161 7.280 6,119 84,1
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -198 1,459 33.965 32 506 99.7
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 2.000 2,000 100.0
67 OTNER EQUIPMENT 0 0 3,200 3~200 100.0
Totals 40,640 85,126 672,810 587,684 87,3
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 40,640 85,126 672,810 587,684 87.3
Totals 40,640 85,126 672,810 587,684 87.3
03/07'2001 2 Months ( 16.6% ; Completed
~7:87:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months 83.3% Remaining
FRRDBR01-
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
POLICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGPJ~M TOT~.LS
01 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 134,496 295,782 1,926,216 1,630,434 84.6
02 PATROL & TP~FFIC ENFORCEMENT 359,277 802 721 8,620,509 4,817,788 85.7
03 CRIME PREVTN & PUBLIC SERVICES 8,434 27 502 213.129 185,627 87.1
04 INVESTIGATIVE & JUVENILE 8RGM 60,933 138~190 1,020,092 881,902 86.5
05 CROSSING GUARDS 1,538 3 671 23,978 20,307 84.7
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 55,579 104 254 626,364 522,110 83.4
Totals 620,257 1,372,120 9,430,288 8,058,168 85.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 401,995 957,012 6,273,395 5,316,383 84.7
81 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 120,184 209,087 1,714,133 1,505,046 87.8
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 7,160 9,060 83,065 74,005 89.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 92,196 182,484 1,166,142 983,658 84.4
55 UTILITIES 293 6,073 58,000 51,927 89.5
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -198 8,404 82,715 74,311 89.8
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT -23 0 31,313 31,313 100.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT -1,350 0 21,525 21,525 100.0
Totals 620,257 1,372,120 9,430,288 8,058,168 85.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENEP~L FUND 620,257 1,372,120 9,415,425 8,043,305 85.4
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 0 14,863 14,863 100.0
090 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GPJ%NT 1996 0 0 0 0
Totals 620,257 1,372,120 9,430,288 8,058,168 85.4
03/07/2001 2 Months ( 16.6% Completed
~?:s~:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months I 83.3%; Remaining
FRRDBR01
suM031 Department Budget Expenditure Sununary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y~T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
FIRE Expended EXpended Budge~ Balance Percent
PROGRA~TOTALS
01 FIRE ADMINISTRATION i19,301 188,062 1,593.036 1.404,974 88.2
02 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 290,351 699,327 5,047,484 4,348,157 86.1
03 FIRS TRAINING ACADEMY -2,378 3 t5,135 15,132 100.0
04 FIRE PREVENTIO~ 26,592 57.921 412,856 354.935 86.3
05 FIRE COMMUNICATIONS 37 5,656 53,940 48,284 89.5
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 31,068 61,031 405,090 344 059 84.9
07 EMERGENCY PREPARDENESS PRG~ -6,128 0 15,620 15,620 100.0
08 PAID-ON-CALL PROGRAM 964 4,273 32,490 28.217 86.~
Totals 459.810 1,016,273 7,575,651 6,559,378 86.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
58 PERSONAL SERVICES 336.197 738.285 5,272,625 4,534.380 86.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 109,039 180,685 1,558,150 1,377,465 88.4
52 OTEER EMPLOYEE COSTS 2,750 13,080 125,560 112.500 89.6
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27.772 58.921 408,151 349,230 85.6
55 UTILITIES -133 4.567 37,150 32,583 87.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES -1,704 11,594 96,430 84.836 88,0
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 9,000 9, )00 100,0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 5.043 4,200 -843 -20.1
67 OTEER EQUIPMENT -14,111 4,118 64,375 60,257 93.6
Totals 459.,810 1,016,273 7,575,651 6,559,378 86,6
03/07 2001 2 Months 16.6% Completed
~:~?:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT l0 Months' 83.3%) Remaining
FRRDBR01.
SUMO~i Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION E~pended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/07,2001 2 Months { 16.6% ) Completed
~7:57:~5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Mo=t~ ~ 83.3% R~mai~i=S
FRRDBR01
suM031 Department Budget Expenditure Sun~ary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/BLDGS Expended Expended Budge~ Ba] ~nce Percen~
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION 1~,65t 22,368 124,265 91,897 74.0
02 MAINTENANCE - PUBLIC BUILDINGS 23 208 71 042 694,538 623,496 89.8
04 STREET MAINTENANCE 3 098 13 131 490,858 477,727 97.3
05 SNOW REMOVAL -79,516 77,650 308.759 231,109 74.9
06 LEAF REMOVAL 4 816 12 240 155,918 143,678 92.1
07 STORM SEWER & BASIN MAINT 6 390 15 013 146,435 131.422 89.7
08 MAINTENANCE OF STATE MIGMWAYS 15 749 18 639 59,812 41,173 68.8
09 TRAFFIC SIGN ~AINTENANCE 7 632 12 442 98.347 85.905 87.2
11 P~RKING LOT MAINTENANCE 9 408 22 060 280,895 258.835 92,1
Total~ 2,396 274,585 2,359,827 2,085,242 88.4
EXPENDITURE ULAS8IFICATEON
50 PERSONAL SBRVICES 22 389 157 960 1.050.729 892,769 85.0
81 BMBLOYEB BENEFITS 11 079 36 357 244,418 208.061 85.1
84 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -27 357 21,649 419.746 398 097 94.8
0~/07~2001 ~ Months 16.6% I Completed
~?:sv:~5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months 83.3% ; Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T~D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GRNDS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/07/2001 2 Months ( 16.6% Completed
~7:s7:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT i0 Months ~ 83.3% Remaining
FRRDBR0t
SUMO3E Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING Expended Expended Budge~ Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 ENGINEERING SERVICES 29.201 73,624 652~924 879 300 88.7
05 TRAFFIC CNTRL & STREET LGETNG -6,354 28 686 533 214 E04,528 94.6
Totals 22,847 102,310 1,186,138 1,083,828 91.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 27,831 57,238 507,593 450,3E5 88.7
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,896 17,972 130,112 112,140 86.2
82 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 413 998 5,930 4,932 83.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -18,394 8,215 162,943 184,728 98.0
85 UTILITIES 439 13,094 248,800 235,706 94.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,477 1,880 15,875 13,998 88.2
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 728 2,700 1,972 73.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 2,185 2,185 2,185 0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 110,000 110,000 t00.0
Totals 22,847 102,310 1,186,138 1,083,828 91.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 34,936 98,446 909,868 814,422 89.5
080 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND -12,089 6,864 276,~70 269,406 97.8,
Totals 22,847 102,310 1,186,138 1,083,828 91.4
03/07/2001 2 Months ' 16.6% Completed
~?:s?:~6 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Mo~ths I 83.3~ , R~
FRRDBR01.
suM031 Department BUdget Expenditure Suanmary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEWER Expended Expended Bud~e~ Balance Percent
PROGR3~M TOTALS
01 WATER & SEWER DIVISION ADMIN 80.320 t70,487 1,323,233 1,152,746 87.1
02 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS -876 2,315 81,665 79,350 97.2
03 MAINTEN~.NCE OF GROUNDS 264 4,853 80,652 76,099 94.4
04 WATER SUPPLY MAINT & REPAIR -43,413 51,490 664,456 612,966 92.3
05 WATER DISTRBT MAINT & REPAIR -75,723 42,301 601,451 559,150 93.0
06 WATER VALVE/RYDRNT MAINT & REP 4.144 24,933 287 001 262,068 91.3
07 WATER METER MAINT & REPL 631 19,216 273.934 254,718 93.0
08 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 44 081 88.163 528.975 440. 312 83.3
09 SANITARY SEWER MAINT & REPAIR -28.048 24,116 391,617 367,501 93.8
10 WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROV -44,759 0 521 900 521,900 100.0
12 LAKE MICSIGAN WATER SUPPLY 229 300 404,675 3,056,480 2,651,805 86.8
Totals 165,921 832,249 7,811,364 6,979,118 89.3
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 79,896 173,566 1,331,253 1,157,687 87.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 27,150 56,174 377,000 320,826 85.1
82 OTNER EMPLOYEE COSTS 4 030 5,605 25,720 20.115 78.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 251,081 560,979 4,659,604 4,098,625 88.0
55 UTILITIES -6,108 13,724 137,170 123,446 90.0
86 INSLrPu%NCE 8,838 17,675 106,053 88,378 83.3
57 CO~940DITIES & SUPPLIES '11,812 4,106 232,800 228,694 98.2
59 OTNER EXPENDITURES 0 0 22,364 22,364 100.0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 4,300 4.300 100.0
67 OTEER EQUIPMENT -87,698 420 264,300 263,880 99.8
68 DISTRIEUTION SYSTEMS -99,456 0 543,700 543,700 100.0
71 BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 107.100 107,100 100,0
Totals 165,921 832,249 7,811,364 6,979,115 89.3
SOURCE OF FUNDS
610 WATER ARD SEWER FUND 168,921 832,249 7,811,364 6,979,115 89.3
Totals 165,921 83~,249 7,811,364 6,979,115 89.3
03/07/2001 E Months 16.6% Completed
~7:~7:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~o Months 83.2% Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Sttmmary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpe~ded Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
03/07/2001 2 Months I 16.6% Completed
~:5.~ --------~.~--VTT'~-~ OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~o Months ~ 83.3% Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Suamlary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 U~expended unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - VE~ICLE ~iAII~T Expended Expended B~d~e~ Balance Percen~
03/07 2001 2 Months 16,6% , Completed
~:57,~5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Months ( 83,3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM0~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
COMbUu-NITY SERVICE PROGRAMS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percen~
03/07/2001 2 Months 16~6% ' Completed
~7:57:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT J0 Months , 8~.0~ ~ R~
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Sua~mary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T~D 2001 U~expended unexpended
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Expended Expended Budge~ Balance Percent
03/05/2001 2 Months ( 16.~% ) Completed
~7:s7:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~o
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Sununary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cuz MO Y-T-£ 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
DEBT SERVICE Expended Expended Budget Balance P~rcent
2O
03/07.200~ 2 Months 16.6% ; Completed
~v:s?:~s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~0 Mont~s I 83~3~ E~ininS
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y~T-D 2001 Unexpended Une×pended
RETIREE PENSIONS Expended Expended Bud~e~ Balance Percent
03/07/2001 2 Months ( 16.6% Completed
~:s?:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT lO Months ( 83.3% Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
RISK MANAGEMENT Expended Expended Bud~e~ Balance Percenn
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 CASUALTY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 217,143 253,124 851 190 598 066 70.3
02 MEDICAL INSUR~%NCE 4,622 210.562 2,669 713 2,45~.151 92.1
Totals 221,765 463,686 3,520,903 3,057.217 86.8
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 38,960 38,950 100.0
56 INSURANCE 221,765 463 686 3,481 953 3,018,267 86.7
Totals 221,765 463,686 3,520,903 3,057.217 86.8
SOURCE OF FUNDS
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 221,765 463.686 3,520 903 3,057 217 86.8
Totals 821,765 463,686 3,520,903 3,057,217 86.8
22
)3/0T[2001 2 Months 16.6% Completed
~?:s7:~5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months 83.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget W. xponditure Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T-D 2001 Unexpended Unexpended
NON-DEPARTMENTAL Expended Expended Budge~ Balance Percen~
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 CONTINGENCIES 0 0 641,970 641,970 100.0
Totals 0 O 641,970 641,970 100.0
23
03/07/2001 2 Months 16.6% Completed
~:~7:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Mo~th~ . 83.~, Be~n~9
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/01 - 02/28/01
Cur MO Y-T~D 2001 Unexpended Unexpe~ded
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Expended Expended Bud~e~ Balance P~rcent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 LIBRARY SERVICES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573.000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,5~3,000 4,573,000 100.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
90 COMPONENT UNIT EXPENDITURES 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100,9
Totals 0 0 4,573,000 4,573,000 100.0
24
~oo~
arch 2, 2001
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
To Whom It May Concern:
We are returning the village liquor license renewal apphcation, for Walgreens store
g00209, located at 1028 S. Elmhurst Road, Mt. Prospect, IL. They no longer sell liquor,
so we will not be renewing this license. :
Should you need something further or have any questions please call me at (847)914-
5037, thank you.
Sincerely,
WALGREEN CO.
Dawn Rebacz ~
Tax Department
(847)914-5037
Encl: Village Liquor License Renewal Application
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUb ~ ~-ES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
COOK COUNTY, iLLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That in accordance with Subsection A of Section 13.:[08 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, the Corporate Authorities shall determine the number of Liquor Licenses
available in each Classification and shall establish a list specifying the number of Liquor Licenses authorized.
Said list is hereby amended by decreasing the number of Oass C Liquor Licenses by one (1) Walgreens, 1028
South Elmhurst Road and one (1) Class R License, LaTejanita Restaurant, Two West Busse Avenue. Said list
is as follows:
Zero (0) Class A License
Two (2) Class B Licenses
Eight (8) Class C Licenses
One (1) Class D License
One (1) Class E License
One (1) Class G License
Zero (0) Class H License
Zero (0) Class M License
One [1) Class P License
Fifteen (15) Class R Licenses
Sixteen [16) Class S Licenses
One (1) Class T License
Six (6) Class W Licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ,2001.
Village President
Al I Eh'T:
Village Clerk rlq
Class Establishment Number
A 0
B Famous Freddie's; Ye Olde Town Inn 2
C Alvee's Uquors; Balzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Dominick's (Fit. Prospect Plaza);
Gold Eagle Liquors; .]ay Liquors;
Hr. Prospect Liquors; Osco Drugs 8
D Prospect Noose Lodge 1
E Bristol Court Banquet Hall
1
G Hr. Prospect Park District-Golf Course
H 0
N 0
P CVS Pharmacy
R Artemis; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Cuisine of India;
Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); Hah River;
House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; Little America;
Nina Restaurant; Pusan; Red A Chinese Restaurant;
Sakura; Taqueda Fiesta; Torishin 15
S Applebee's; Balla Capri; El Sombrero;
.3ake's Pizza; .lameson's Charhouse; Kampai; -
The Loft; Mrs. P & Ne Restaurant; New Shin .lung;
Nikki D's Charhouse; Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant;
Pap's Grill & Bar; Retro Bistro; Rokudenashi; Sam's Place 16
T Brunswick Zone-Thunderbird Lanes
W Frankie's Fast Food; Fratelli's; Los Ar(os Restaurant;
Fir. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs 6
52
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM ~~
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUI~TY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: MARCH 20, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA-02-01, 2105 PRENDERGAST LANE
I spoke to the petitioner for the above Zoning Board case, Frank Panzarino, to discuss the status of his petition. I
explained that he needed to either go forward with the petition this evening or withdraw his petition. Mr.
Panzarino indicated that he didn't believe he would receive approval from the Board for his request and,
therefore, wished to withdraw his petition. I indicated that I would need something in writing from him for our
file and for the Village BOard's information. He indicated that he had given me his verbal permission and he
thought that was satisfactory. Although I again requested that he provide that information in writing, he refused
to do so.
Given that Mr. Panzarino is reluctant to provide his withdrawal in writing, I would recommend that the Village
Board, in accordance with the Zoning Board of Appeals' recommendation, deny the request so that there is
official action on this matter. Although I would obviously prefer to have a written request for withdrawal from
the petitioner, he has refused to provide this document.
Please forward this memorandum to the Village Board for their review and consideration at tonight's meeting.
Staffwill be present at that meeting to answer any questions related to this matter.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. IANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 2001
SUBJECT: ZBA-02~01 - VARIATION FOR AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE (PORCH)
2105 PRENDERGAST LANE
APPLICANT - PANZARINO RESIDENCE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to deny Case ZBA-02-01, a request to construct an
enclosed 3-season room in the rear yard setback. The attached ZBA staff report described the request in detail.
The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their January 25, 2001 meeting:
The subject property is an interior lot that abuts St. Cecilia Church. The proposed structure will encroach 15-feet
into the required 25-foot rear yard setback. The applicants propose to construct a 33'x15' enclosed 3-season room
structure along the rear of the existing residence. The ZBA discussed lot coverage, aesthetics of the
neighborhood, and the said hardship created by the detention area located behind the applicant's property.
The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 4-2 to deny the Variation for a ten-foot rear setback for Case No. ZBA-02-01
at 2105 Prendergast Lane.
After the hearing, file petitioner brought to staff's attention that a similar variation was granted ten years ago to
607 and 609 Noah Terrace. A copy of the Village Board minutes pertaining to these cases is attached to this
memo. Although those cases were similar in hature, it does not change the fact that the pending request does not
meet the standards for a variation prescribed in the Village Zoning Ordinance.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
February 6, 2001 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this r~tter.
William J. Cooney, AI~P
VWL
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2105 PRENDERGAST LANE
WHEREAS, Frank and Anna Panzarino (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have
filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 2105 Prendergast
Lane (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as
follows:
Lot 33 in St. Cecilia Subdivision, being a Resubdivision of Lot 2 and parts of Lots 3
and 6 in Meier Brothers Subdivision, being a Subdivision of parts of Sections 10 and
15, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian. in Cook
County, Illinois
Property Index Number: 08-10-306-033
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation from Section 14.905.B.1 to permit a ten
foot(10') rear yard setback, instead of the required twenty-five feet (25'), to allow the
construction of an enclosed structure to the existing single family dwelling; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 02-01 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 25~ day of January, 2001, pursuant to proper legal notice
having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Top~cs on ~the 10th day of
January, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same
meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation
would be in the best interest of the Village.
2105 Prendergast Lane
Page 2/2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
.SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14~203.C.7 of the
Village Code, to allow the construction of an enclosed structure in the rear yard,
which will encroach into the minimum side yard required by the Mount Prospect
Village Code, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and
hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.203.C.12 of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the Variation granted herein shall be null and void
unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date
of passage of this Ordinance.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT: -~
PASSED and APPROVED thiS day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois '
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: LEFT TURN RESTRICTION AT WESTBOUND CENTRAL ROAD
AND WA-PELLA AVENUE
At the March 6 Village Board meeting, the Mayor and Board of Trustees considered the
recommendation of the Village's Safety Commission to retain the left-turn restriction at
the intersection of westbound Central Road and Wa-Pella Avenue. In addition to
considering the Safety Commission's report and recommendation, public comment was
taken from residents who were opposed to the maintenance of the turn restriction.
After deliberation, the Board voted to concur with the recommendation of the Safety
Commission. At that time, I indicated that an appropriate Ordinance would be prepared
for first reading at the March 20 Board meeting; I was mistaken in the information I
provided at that time; Due to the fact that an Ordinance prohibiting the left-turn is
already in place, no official action needs to be taken by the Village Board. The status
quo would remain in place until such time as the Board decides to change the current
restrictions.
As a result of the discussions at the March 6 meeting, staff has-begun conducting
selected traffic counts at the entrances to Central Village and the medical building. The
results of those traffic counts will help to determine the nature and extent of the cut-
through problem at those locations. As soon as the counts are completed and
analyzed, the data will be forwarded to the Village Board for review and consideration.
~NIS
MEJ/rcc
c: Acting Police Chief Thomas Daley
Public Works Director Glen Andler
Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL SANONIS I
EROM: PROmCT ENGINEER ~'~ ~'~
DATE: MARCH 16, 2001 ~
SUBJECT: LEFT TUILN PROHIBITION AT CENTP,_iL ROAD & WA-PELLAv ~...,~/AVENUE
At the March 6, 2001 Village Board Meeting, Staff presented to the Village Board of Trustees the
recommendation from the Safety Commission m leave m place the current ordinance that
prohibits a left tarn from westbound Central Road to southbound Wa-Pella Avenue. During the
discussion, a concern was raised about the amount of cut-through traffic experienced by the
medical building at 601 W. Central and the Central Village Aparmaents. As a result, Staff was
asked to obtain manual ucaffic counts during the morning and evemng peak travel times to
determine the severity of the problem.
On Thursday, March 15th. Staff observed the traffic patterns ar both complexes. The attached
drawing shows the number of vehicles observed cutting-through the properties. As you can see,
some of the cut-through traffic actually was eastbound Central Road vehicles who, because of a
back-up from Prospect Avenue, did not want to wait in order to turn right onto Wa-Pella Avenue.
Overall, the additional "No Thra Traffic" signs and Police presence seem to have had a positive
effect on reducing the number of ant-through vehicles. Staff mcently spoke with the property
owner at 601 W. Central who stated the Police presence has made a big impact but cut-through
traffic is still occasionally seen during the day.
Matthew P. Lawrie
cc: Director of Public Works Glen Andler
Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker
x:~files\engincer~rra ffic~sa fecomm\wapella_cenfral~ncmo2.doc
Village of Mount ProSpect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~}. ~
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001 ~
SUBJECT: PC-07-2000- PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION- HINKLE SUBDIVISIONG..,,,~.
2120 WHITE OAK
GUISEPPE STANFA - APPLICANT
The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PC-07-2000, Hinkle Subdivision, a
request to subdivide one-lot of reenrd and create a two-lot subdivision, as described in detail in the attached staff
report. The Plan Commission heard the request at their March 7, 2001 meeting.
The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed plat and discussed the topography of the site, the location of the
existing house, and the new house to be constructed on proposed second lot. They found that the proposed
subdivision meets all Village code requirements and does not require any variations from the Zon'mg Ordinance
or Development Code.
The Plan Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Hinkle Subdivision Case No. PC-0?-2000 at
2120 White Oak.
Please fonvard this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
March 20, 2001 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MICHAEL ZADEL, CHAIRMAN
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: MARCH 1, 2001
SUBJECT: PC-07-2000/HINKLE SUBDIVISION/2120 WHITE OAK
Background
Petitioner: Guiseppe Stanfa, Property Owner
491 Alles
Des Plaines, IL 60016
Requested Action: Plat of resubdivision creating a two-lot subdivision
Analysis
The petitioner is seeking to subdivide one lot of record to create a two-lot subdivision. The petitioner proposes to
construct a new house on the second lot.
The subject property is located at the northwest comer of Prairie and White Oak. The existing house will be
located on Lot I of the proposed Hinkle Subdivision and will continue to meet the applicable zoning setback
requirements. The size of the new lots meet Zoning and Development Code requirements, frontage and depth
respectively, and any new structure(s) will be required to meet Village codes or seek relief from the appropriate
board or commission. The petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code or Zoning Code requirements.
The proposed plat of resubdivision seeks to create two separate lots of record. The plat and new lots comply with
Development Code requirements and the petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code or the
Zoning Ordinance.
Recommendation
The proposed plat of resubdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code
requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Hinkle Subdivision for the property located at 2120
White Oak, Case No. PC-07-2000.
I concur:
Director of Community Development
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
March 7, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of thc Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael
Zadel at 7:07 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
Edwin Janus
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Antoinette Astreides
Bill Reddy
Village Staff Present: Judy Connolly AICP, Senior Planner
Others in Attendance: Ter~ Franzen
Bob Reilly
Criuseppe Stunfa
Guiseppe Aiello
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chainmn Zadel asked for comments or changes to the minutes from January 17, 2001 Carol Tortorello
moved to approve the minutes and Gary Grouwinkle seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-
0. Chairman Zadel asked staffto present the first case, PC-07-2000.
SUBDIVISIONS:
PC-07-2000/HINKLE SUBDIVISION (2120 WHITE OAK)
Judy Counolly, Senior Planner, introduced the case, Hinlde Subdivision. She said that the petitioner
would like to subdivide the existing lot and create a two-lot subdivision at the northwest comer of White
Oak and Prairie. She said that the petitioner created the lot sizes based on the existing house remaining
and having it meet current zoning setbacks, while still being able to construct a house on the proposed
second lot that would be consistent with current development trends. Ms. Cunnolly said that the
petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning regulations. She said that
the plat was prepared in accordance with Development code requirements. Therefore, Staffrecommends
approval of the Hinkle Subdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner to present his request. Guiseppe Stanfa said that he purchased the lot
with his brother-in-law and that they wanted to build a new house on the second tot and after researching
Village codes and regulations concerning the plat and furore development, had prepared the plat
according to Village codes. Guiseppe Aiello added that he is a contractor and was involved with the
construction of the two new houses along Prairie. Plan Commission members asked about the
topography of the site and how the existing swale, combined with a new house, would impact the adjacent
houses. Mr. Aiello said that the swale is on the lot adjacent to the 2120 property and that there would be
minimal impact on the neighborhood. There was further discussion that clarified the location of the
property lines.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
Grouwinkle moved to approve the Hinkle Subdivision and Ed Janus seconded the motion. The plat was
approved 5-0.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 2
March 7, 2001
PC-01-01/METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PLAT OF SUBDIVIlSON (2440 E. RAND ROAD)
Chairman Zadel asked Ms. Connolly to introduce the next case, Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of
Subdivision. She said that the petitioner received Village Board approval to rezone the subject properties
and a Conditional Use penuit to construct a drive-thru for the credit union. She said that the petitioner is
required to consolidate the lots in order to meet Village codes and as a condition of approval of the
Conditional Use permit. She said that the petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code
requirements and that the site will be constructed according to all Village regulations, in addition to
conditions listed as part of the ordinance granting the Conditional Use permit for items such as additional
landscaping and removing the billboard. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with
Development Code requirements and that staff recommends approval of the plat.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he wanted to add to staff's report. Robert Reilly said that he
represents the petitioner, Metro Federal Credit Union, and that his client jnst closed on the property. He
said that the site would provide storm water detention as required by the Development Code and that all
other Village requirements will be met. There was discussion about how the parcel was originally created
by the County, the impact of changing the grading to construct the new building, and when the billboard
will be removed.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Carol
Tortorello moved to approve the Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of Subdivision and Gary Grouwinkle
seconded the motion, The plat was approved 5-0.
PC-03-01/FRANZEN'S RESUBDIVISION (319 N. PROSPECT MANOR)
Chairman Zadel asked Judy Connolly to present the next case, Fmnzen's Kesubdivision. Ms. Connolly
said that there is an existing house and patio on the subject properties. She said that the site is comprised
of two lots of record and that the patio and part of the house were built over the lot line. She said that the
petitioner was required to meet applicable Village codes when he replaced an existing patio and in order
to do so, was requked to consolidate the separate lots of record. She said that the Franzen's
Kesubdivision creates a one-lot subdivision and that the property would meet zuning setbacks. Ms.
Connolly said that the petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning
regulations. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with Development Code requkements and
that staff recommends approval of the Franzen's Resubdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he would like to elaborate on staff's report. Terry Franzen said
that he had the plat prepared to comply with Village codes and that he was not seeking relief from any
code regulations. Chairman Zadel said that the case was clear-cut and more of a "housekeeping" issue.
There was discussion about how the house could have been allowed to have been built over the lot line
and how regulations change over the years.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
Grouwinkle moved to approve the Franzen's Resubdivision and Matt Sledz seconded the motion. The
plat was approved 5-0.
PC-06-2000/VILLAGE CENTRE PHASE 1-B PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION (14 E. NW HWY)
Ms. Connolly said that this case would be presented at the next Plan Cornnfission meeting when the plat
would have signat~es from all the utility companies.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 3
March 7, 2001
OLD BUSINESS:
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS:
The Plan Commission discussed corridor improvements around St. Raymond's parking lot, at the
intersections of Golf/Rt. 83, and Rand/Central in addition to the status of the downtown redevelopment,
several commercial developments underway in the Village, and the impact of several anchor stores
closing at Randhurst.
At 7:45 p.m., Chairman Zadel asked for a motion to adjourn2 The motion was approved by a voice vote
and the meeting was adjourned.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~.~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001 UBD~
SUBJECT: PC-01-01 ~ METRO FEDERAL CREDIT LrNION pLAT OF S
2440 E. RAND ROAD
ROBERT REILLY-APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE
The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PC-01-01, Metro Federal Credit Union
Plat of Subdivision, a request to consolidate multiple lots and create a one-lot subdivision subdivide, as described
in detail in the attached staffreport. The Plan Commission heard the request at their March 7, 2001 meeting.
The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed plat and discussed storm water detention requirements for the site
and how the site would be graded. They found that the proposed subdivision meets all Village code requirements
and does not require any variations from the Zoning Ordinance or Development Code..
The Plan Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of Subdivision
Case No. PC-01-01 at 2440 E. Rand Road.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
March 20, 2001 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
William J. Cooney, AICP'
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MICHAEL ZADEL, CHAIRMAN
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: MARCH 1, 2001
SUBJECT: PC-01-01/lVlETRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION/2440 E. RAND ROAD
Background
Petitioner: Metro Federal Credit Union, Property Owner
260 N. Evergreen Avenue
Arlington Heights, IL 60004
Requested Action: Plat of resubdivision creating a one-lot subdivision
Analysis
The petitioner is seeking to consolidate two separate lots of record to create a one-lot subdivision. The petitioner
proposes to construct a credit union/banking facility and is required to consolidate the lots to meet Village code
requirements.
The petitioner proposes to raze all existing structures and construct a drive-thru banking facility. The Village
Board recently approved the Metro Federal Credit Union's request for rezoning and a Conditional Use permit for
the drive-thru. The petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements and will consu'uct the
site according to all Village codes and requirements in addition to conditions listed in the ordinance granting the
Conditional Use permit.
The proposed plat of resubdivi$ion complies with Village Code reqmrements. It creates a one-lot subdivision and
the petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code. The plat also must be approved by Village Board.
Recommendation
The proposed plat of resubdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code
requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Metro Federal Credit Union Subdivision for the
property lo~ated at 2440 E. Rand Road, Case No. PC-01-01
I concur:
William I. ~oon~ey, AIOP
Director of Community Development
METRO FEDERA\L CREDIT UNION
, ~
..... .
........................... , ...... CEM~, Ltd.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
March 7, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael
Zadel at 7:07 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
Edwin Janus
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Antoinette Astreides
Bill Reddy
Village Staff Present: Judy Connolly AICP, Senior Planner
Others in Attendance: Terry Franzen
Bob Reilly
Giuseppe Stanfa
Guiseppe Aiello
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chairman Zadel asked for comments or changes to the minutes from January 17, 2001. Carol Tortorello
moved to approve the minutes and Gary Grouwinkle seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-
0. Chairman Zadel asked staff to present the first case, PC-07-2000.
SUBDMSIONS:
PC-07-2000/HINKLE SUBDIVISION (2120 WHITE OAK)
Judy ConnoIly; Senior Planner, introduced the case, [-Iinlde Subdivision. She said that the petitioner
would like to subdivide the existing lot and create a two-lot subdivision at the northwest comer of White
Oak and Prairie. She said that the petitioner created the lot sizes based on the existing house remaining
and having it meet current zoning setbacks, while still being able to construct a house on the proposed
second lot thai would be consistent with current development trends. Ms. Connolly said that the
petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning regulations. She said that
the plat was prepared in accordance with Development code reqmrements. Therefore. Staff recommends
approval of the Hinkle Subdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner to present his request. Guiseppe Stanfa said that he purchased the lot
with his brother-in-law and that they wanted to build a new house on the second lot and after researching
Village codes and regulations concerning the plat and future development, had prepared the plat
according to Village codes. Guiseppe Aiello added that he is a contractor and was involved with the
construction of the two new houses along Prairie. Plan Commission members asked about the
topography of the site and how the existing swale, combined with a new house, would impact the adjacent
houses. Mr. Aiello said that the swale is on the lot adjacent to the 2120 property and that there would be
minimal impact on the neighborhood. There was further discussion that clarified the location of the
property lines.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
Grouwinkle moved to approve the Hinkle Subdivision and Ed Janus seconded the motion. The plat was
approved 5-0.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 2
March 7, 2001
PC-01-01/METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PLAT OF SUBDIVIISON (2440 E. RAND ROAD)
Chairman Zadel asked Ms. Connolly to introduce the next case, Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of
Subdivision. She said that the petitioner received Village Board approval to rezone the subject properties
and a Conditional Use permit to construct a drive-thru for the credit union. She said that the petitioner is
required to consolidate the lots in order to meet Village codes and as a condition of approval of the
Conditional Use permit. She said that the petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code
requirements and that the site will be constructed according to all Village regulations, in addition to
eondifious listed as part of the ordinance granting the Conditional Use permit for items such as additional
landscaping and removing the billboard. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with
Development Code requirements and that staff recommends approval of the plat.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he wanted to add to staff's report. Robert Reilly said that he
represents the petitioner, Metro Federal Credit Union, and that his client just closed on the property. He
said that the site would provide storm water detention as required by the Development Code and that all
other Village requirements will be met. There was discussion about how the parcel was originally created
by the County, the impact of changing the grading to construct the new building, and when the billboard
will be removed.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Carol
Tortorello moved to approve the Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of Subdivision and Gary Grouwinkle
seconded the motion. The plat was approved 5-0.
PC-03 -01/FRANZEN'S RESUBDIVISION (319 N; PROSPECT MANOR)
Chairman Zadel asked Judy Cormolly to present the next case, Franzen's Kesubdivision. Ms. Connolly
said that there is an existing house and patio on the subject properties. She said that the site is comprised
of two lots of record and that the patio and part of the house were built over the lot line. She said that the
petitioner was required to meet applicable Village codes when he replaced an existing patio and in order
to do so, was required to consolidate the separate lots of record. She said that the Franzen's
Resubdivision creates a one-lot subdivision and that the property would meet zoning setbacks. Ms.
Connolly said that the petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning
regulations. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with Development Code requirements and
that staff recommends approval of the Franzen's Resubdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he would like to elaborate on staff's report. Terry Franzen said
that he had the plat prepared to comply with Village codes and that he was not seeking relief from any
code regulations. Chairman Zadel said that the case was clear-cut and more of a "housekeeping" issue.
There was discussion about how the house could have been allowed to have been built over the lot line
and how regulations change over the years.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
GTouwinkle moved to approve the Franzen's Kesubdivision and Matt Sledz seconded the motion. The
plat.was approved 5~0.
PC-06-2000/VILLAGE CENTRE PHASE 1-B PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION (14 E. NW HWY)
Ms. Connolly said that this case would be presented at the next Plan Commission meeting when the plat
would have signatures from all the utility companies.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 3
March 7, 2001
OLD BUSINESS:
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
COMMENTS AND OTI:tER BUSINESS:
The Plan Commission discussed corridor improvements around St. Raymond's parking lot, at the
intersections of Golf/Rt. 83, and Rand/Central in addition to the status of the downtown redevelopment,
several commercial developments underway in the Village, and the impact of several anchor stores
closing at Randhurst.
At 7:45 p.m., Chairman Zadel asked for a motion to adjourn. The motion was approved by a voice vote
and the meeting was adjourned.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~1~}/O'
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001 ~
SUBJECT: PC-03-01 - PLAT OF RESLrBDIVISION - FRANZEN' S R.ESUBDIVISION
319 N. PROSPECT MANOR
TERRY FRANZEN - APPLICANT
The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PC-03-01, Franzen's Resubdivision, a
request to consolidate multiple lots and create a one-lot subdivision, as described in detail in the attached staff
report. The Plan Commission heard the request at their March 7, 2001 meeting.
The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed plat and discussed the location of the existing house and patio.
They found that the proposed subdivision meets all Village code requirements and does not require any variations
from the Zoning Ordinance or Development Code.
The Plan Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the Franzen's Resubdivision Case No. PC-03-01 at
319 N. Prospect Manor.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
March 20, 2001 meeting. Staffwil! be present to answer any questions related to this matter.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
March 7, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael
Zudel at 7:07 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
Edwin Janus
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Antoinette Astreides
Bill Reddy
Village Staff Present: Judy Cormolly AICP, Senior Planner
Others in Attendance: Terry Franzen
Bob Reilly
Giuseppe Stanfa
Guiseppe Aiello
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chairman Zadel asked for comments or changes to the minutes from January 17, 2001 Carol Tortorello
moved to approve the minutes and Gary G-rouwinkle seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-
0. Chairman Zadel asked staffto present the first case, PC-07-2000.
SUBDIVISIONS:
PC-07-2000/HINKLE SUBDIVISION (2120 WHITE OAK)
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the case, Hinkle Subdivision. She said that the petitioner
would like to subdivide the existing lot and create a two-lot subdivision at the northwest comer of White
Oak and Prairie. She said that the petitioner created the lot sizes based on the existing house remaining
and having it meet currcm zoning setbacks, while still being able to construct a house on the proposed
second lot that would be consistent with current development trends. Ms. Cunnolly said that the
petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning regulations. She said that
thc plat was prepared in accordance with Development code requirements. Therefore, Staff recommends
approval of the Hinlde Subdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner to present his request. Guiseppe Stanfa said that he purchased the lot
with his brother-in-law and that they wanted to build a new house on the second lot and after researching
Village codes and regulations concerning the plat and future development, had prepared the plat
according to Village codes. Guiseppe Aiello added that he is a contractor and was involved with the
construction of the two new houses along Prairie. Plan cormmssion members asked about the
topography of the site and how the existing swale, combined with a new house, would impact the adjacent
houses. Mr. Aiello said that the swale is on the lot adjacent to the 2120 property and that there would be
minimal impact on the neighborhood. There was further discussion that clarified the location of the
property lines.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
Grouwinkle moved to approve the Hinkie Subdivision and Ed Janus seconded the motion. The plat was
approved 5-0.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 2
March 7, 2001
PC-01-01/METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PLAT OF SUBDIVIISON (2440 E. RAND ROAD)
Chairman Zadel asked Ms. Connolly to introduce the next case, Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of
Subdivision. She said that the petitioner received Village Board approval to rezone the subject properties
end a Conditional Use permit to construct a drive-thru for the credit union. She said that the petitioner is
required to consolidate the lots in order to meet Village codes and as a condition of approval of the
Conditional Use permit. She said that the petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code
requirements and that the site will be constructed according to all Village regulations, in addition to
conditions listed as part of the ordinance granting the Conditional Use permit for items such as additional
lendscaping and removing the billboard. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with
Development Code requirements and that staff reeornmends approval of the plat.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he wanted to add to staff's report. Robert Reilly said that he
represents the petitioner, Metro Federal Credit Union, end that his client just closed on the property. He
said that the site would provide storm water detention as required by the Development Code end that all
other Village requirements will be met. There was discussion about how the parcel was or/ginally created
by the County, the impact of changing the grading to construct the new building, and when the billboard
will be removed.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Carol
Tortorello moved to approve the Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of Subdivision and Gary Grouwinkle
seconded the motion. The plat was approved 5-0.
PC-03-01/FRANZEN'S RESLrBDIVISION (319 N. PROSPECT MANOR)
Chairman Zadel asked Judy Connolly to present the next case, Franzen's Resubdivision. Ms. Connolly
said that there is en existing house end patio on the subject properties. She said that the site is comprised
of two lots of record and that the patio and part of the house were built over the lot line. She said that the
petitioner was required to meet applicable Village codes when he replaced an existing patio and in order
to do so, was required to consolidate the separate lots of record. She said that the Frenzen's
Res~bdivision creates a one-lot subdivision and that the property would meet zoning setbacks. Ms.
Cormolly said that the petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning
regulations. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with Development Code requirements end
that staff recommends approval of the Franzen's Resubdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he would like to elaborate on staff's report. Terry Franzen said
that he had the plat prepared to comply with Village codes and that he was not seeking relief from any
code regulations. Chairman Zadel said that the case was clear-cut and more of a ,'housekeeping" issue.
There was discussion about how the house could have been allowed to have been built over the lot line
and how regulations change over the years.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
Grouwinlde moved to approve the Frenzen's Resubdivision and Matt Sledz seconded the motion. The
plat was approved 5-0.
PC-06-2000/VILLAGE CENTRE PHASE 1-B PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION (14 E. NW HWY)
Ms. Connolly said that this case would be presented at the next Plan Commission meeting when the plat
would have signatures from all the utility companies.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 3
March 7, 2001
OLD BUSINESS:
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
COM3~NTS AND OI'H ~:R BUSINESS:
The Plan Commission discussed corridor improvements around St. Raymond's parking lot, at the
intersections of Golf/Rt. 83, and Rand/Central in addition to the status of the downtown redevelopment,
several commercial developments underway in the Village, and the impact of several anchor stores
closing at Randhurst.
At 7:45 p.m., Chairman Zadel asked for a motion to adjourn. The motion was approved by a voice vote
and the meeting was adjourned.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MICHAEL ZADEL, CHAIRMAN
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: MARCH 1, 2001
SUBJECT: PC-03-01/FRANZEN'S RESUBDIVISION/319 N. PROSPECT MANOR
Background
Petitioner: Terry Franzen
319 N. Prospect Manor
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Property Owner: same
Requested Action: Plat ofresubdivision creating a one-lot subdivision
Analysis
The petitioner is seeking to consolidate two lots of record to create a one-lot subdivision. During the replacement
of an existing patio, it was learned that the location of the patio did not comply with Village codes. The patio was
constructed across the property line and did not meet the zoning setbacks for Lot 21. Although the petitioner
owns both lots of record, the petitioner is required per Village Code to consolidate the lots in order to comply with
Village regulations that prohibit building across property lines and that s~uctures meet the necessary setbacks.
The subject property is located at the comer of Gregory and Prospect Manor. There is an existing house and
garage on one lot of record and a patio, which crosses the current "shared" property line and is located on two lots
of record.
The proposed plat of resubdivision is requested in order to comply with Village Code requirements as noted
above and creates a one-lot subdivision. The petitioner is not seeking relief fi.om the Development Code or the
Zoning Ordinance.
Recommendation
The proposed plat of resubdivision is complete and has been prepared in accordance with the Development Code
requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Franzen's Resubdivision for the property located at
319 N. Prospect Manor, Case No. PC-03-01.
I concur:
William J. cooney~, A*CP
Director of Community Development
LAW OFFICES
KLEIN, THORPE AND JENKINS, LTD.
Suite 1660
Patrick A, Lucansky 20 North Wacker Drive Rinda Y. Allison
B. Kenneth Ftik~t Chicago, Illinois 60606-2903 James V. Ferolo
Gerard E. Dempsey ..... Michael T. Ju~z~
Ter~enee M. Bamicle Telephone (3121 984-6400 Thomas M. Melody
Brace A. Zolna Facsimile ~312) 984-6444 Lance C. Malina
James P. Banley (312) 606-7077 JlLie E. Heubevgers
MEMORA.DUM
Village Manager
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr.
DATE: March 13, 2001
RE: New Ordinances
Please find attached two ordinances amending the Village Code. These amendments
are prompted by problems that the Finance Department has experienced when requiring
some taxicab owners and vending machine owners to obtain a Village business license.
We have discovered that 303 Taxicab actually owns no taxicabs. Rather, it functions
as a dispatching and licans~ng agent for other owners. 303 uses its allotment of Mount
Prospect cab licenses for the owners that use its dispatching services. Tile Village does not
have the opportunity to conduct any cnecks on the actual owners of the cabs. This:erdinance
will require that the individual owners obtain the licenses.
The second ordinance closes a loophole that allowed some vending machine owners
to claim that they did not have to obtain a business license so long as the individual machine
was licensed. The second ordinance will close up that loophole.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 11 OF THE
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION '1: Article Xl, "Public Passenger Vehicles", Section 11.1 '101, entitled
"Taxicab Company License Required", of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect shall be amended by adding the following sentence to the end of Section
11.1101 which shall be and read as follows:
... Only the actual owner or fleet lessee of a taxicab is eligible to receive a
license. No dispatching service or association of companies may apply for
the license.
~ That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,-~001.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 11 OF THE
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION .1: Article VII, ~Coin-in-Slot Devices", Section 11.702, entitled "License
Required", of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be amended by deleting
Section 11.702 and inserting in lieu thereof the following new Section 11.702 which shall be
and read as follows:
Sec. 11.702. BUSINESS LICENSE REQUIRED.
Every owner of any electronic amusement device, cigarette vending
machine, juke box, reverse-coin device or any other mechanical "coin-in-slot
device" as defined in Article I of this Chapter shall be required to apply for and
obtain a license from the Village Clerk, as provided in Chapter 10 of this Code.
This license requirement shall apply to the owner of the device, whether that
owner resides within or without the Village and irrespective of the financial
arrangement between the owner of the device and the person controlling the
premises where the device is located.
SECTION 2: Article VII, "Coin-in-Slot Devices", Section 11.703, entitled "License
Fees", of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be amended by deleting
Section 11.703 and inserting in lieu thereof the following new Section 11.703 whi~h shall be
and read as follows:
Sec. 1'1.703. LICENSE FEES FOR INDIVIDUAL MACHINES.
Every applicant, before being granted a license shall pay the annual
license fee, as set forth in Article XXXIV of this Chapter, for the priviJege of
operating or maintaining for operation each cigarette vending machine, juke
box, reverse-coin device, or other mechanical coin-in-slot device. This
individual machine license shall be in addition to the general business license
described in Section 11.702.
~ Article VII, "Coin-in-Slot Devices", Section 11.704, entitled "Display of
License", of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be amended by
amending the title of the Section as follows:
Sec, '1'1,704. DISPLAY OF MACHINE LICENSE.
SECTION 4: Article VII, "Coin-in-Slot Devices", Section 11.705, entitled "General
Operating Requirements", of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be
amended by adding a new subparagraph (1) to Paragraph A and renumbering the the
paragraphs in proper succession. The new subparagraph A(1) shall be and read as follows:
1. There shall be posted conspicuously on the front of each device the name,
address and telephone number of the owner.
SECTION 5: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Fadey, Village President
An'EST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: MARCH 14, 2001
SUBJECT: INCREASE IN WATER AND SEWER RATES
PURPOSE:
To present for the Board's consideration an ordinance increasing the Village's water and sewer
rotes.
BACKGROUND:
Since 1990 the Village has followed the practice of approving moderate annual increases in
water and sewer rates, as opposed to implementing large increases periodically. The 2001
Budget includes a 4% increase in water and sewer rates.
DISCUSSION:
The folloWing table illustrates the recommended rates as reflected in the proposed ordinance.
While we generally tried to achieve a 4% increase, rounding down to the nearest cent resulted
in a slightly lower increase.
Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent
Inside Village Per 1,000 Gallons Per 1,000 Gallons Change
Water $3.35 $3.48 3.88%
Sewer $0.35 $0.36 2.86%
Combined $3.70 $3.84 3.78%
Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent
Outside Village Per 1,000 Gallons Per 1,000 Gallons Change
Water $6.71 $6.97 3.87%
Sewer $0.35 $0.36 2.86%
Combined $7.06 $7.33 3.82%
or Village sewer users not connected to the Village's water system, the monthly charge per
dwelling unit would be $3.01, an increase of 3.80% over the current rates.
Ifa Mount Prospect household uses 16,000 gallons of water over a two-month period, their
bimonthly water and sewer usage fee would be $61.44, an increase of $2.24.
No increase is being proposed for the monthly availability charge assessed customers outside
of Special Service Area No. 5. For most customers, those with a 5/8" water line, the charge
will remain at $10.
For purposes of comparison, the Village enacted water and sewer rote increases of 4.2%, 3.5%,
4.0%, 4.0% and 4.0% respectively in the years 1996 through 2000.
Upon adoption of the ordinance, we will place a notice of the pending increase on all water
bills issued between April 3~ and June 1st. The rates would take effect for those bills rendered
after June 1, 2001.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board approve the attached ordinance increasing water and
sewer rates effective for bills rendered after June 1, 2001.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE--
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE V ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES"
OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
~: That paragraphs A and B of Section 22.504.2 entitled "Water Rates" of Article V entitled
"Meters and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so
that hereinafter said Section 22.504.2A and Section 22.504.2B shall be and read as follows:
"Sec. 22.S04.2 WATER RATES:
A. All Village users within the Village, having a direct or indirect connection with Village water mains or
pipes shall pay the following rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
Consumed or portion thereof $3.48
B. All Village users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection with
Village water mains or pipes shall pay the following rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
Consumed or portion thereof $6.97"
~: That paragraph C of Section 22.504.3 entitled "Sewer Rates" of Article V entitled "Meters
and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that
hereinafter said Section 22.504.3.C shall be and read as follows:
"Sec. 22.504.3 SEWER RATES:
C. Rate:
1. AIl Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect
connection with the Village sewer and water mains or pipes shall pay the following sewer rate,
based upon the amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished:
Per 1,000 gallons of water
Consumed or portion thereof $0.36
2. AIl Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect
connection with the Village sewer mains or pipes and not with the Village water mains or pipes
shall pay a fiat rate of:
Per month per dwelling unit $3.01
3. AIl sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection
with the Village sewer and water mains or pipes, shall pay the following sewer rate based upon the
amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished:
Per 1,000 gallons of water
Consumed or portion thereof $0.36
4. All sewer usars outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or indirect connection
with the Village sewer mains or pipes, but not with Village water mains or pipes, shall pay a flat
rote of:
Per month per dwelling unit $3.01"
~: That the fees set forth in this Ordinance shall be applied to all water and sewer bills
rendered after June 1, 2001.
~: That this Ordinance shall be in full fome and effect from and after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this ___ day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS :[~' F~'
&
fro.: ^SS,STAH V, LA E MAHAGER (
DATE: MARCH 15, 2001 ~
SUBJECT: PROPOSED VVIRELESS LEASE - NEXTEL
The monopole is neady complete and operational at the Public Works facility at 1700 W.
Central. VoiceStream constructed the tower and occupies the top array location. When the
project was undertaken the site was designed specifically to accommodate up to four
ground cabinets for four total antenna arrays in addition to the Public Works radio antenna.
Nextel has proposed a lease at the site for $1400 per month increasing 3% annually.
Attached is a rent comparison highlighting the rental amounts over the life of the lease with
Nextel. I would recommend the Village entering into a lease agreement with Nextel for a
ground site and antenna at 1700 W. Central in the initial amount of $1400 per month.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
DAVID STRAHL
H:\GEN\Utilities~lextel VB Cover Memo.doc
F
V~
~1~01
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN NEXTEL AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WIRELESS ANTENNA AT 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is the owner of property located at 1700 West Central
Road; and
WHEREAS, the property referenced herein is used for the operations of the Mount Prospect Public
Works Department; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the best interests of the Village would be served by leasing
ground space on the property to Nextel for the purpose of installing a wireless antenna and
necessary ground support devices on said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
authorize execution of a Lease between Nextel and the Village of Mount Prospect for the purpose
of permitting a wireless antenna and necessary ground support devices to be located on the Village
owned property located at 1700 West Central Road, a copy of the lease attached hereto and
hereby made a part hereof as "Exhibit A."
SECTION TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect froro and after its passage and
approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this . day of ,2001.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velroa W, Lowe
Village Clerk
MKT: Chicago
SITE: IL 3091-B
COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT (GROUND)
This Communications Site Lease Agreement (Ground) ("Agreement") is entered into this day of ,2000, beM'een Nextel
West Corp., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Nextel Communications, ("Lessee"), and of Mount i
("Lessor").
For good and valuable consideration tl follows:
1. Premises. Lessor is the owner of a parcel of land f Cook, State of Illinois,
commonly known as 1700 West Central, Mount Prospect, Illinois I in Exhibit A annexed
hereto. Lessor hereby leases to Lessee and Lessee leases from Lessor = Land and all access and
utility easements, if any, (the "Premises") as i
2. U~se. Lessor agrees to
cooperate permits and any and all other necessary approvals
3, Test pon the Land for
the purpose of: inspectiorts, soil test borings, other reasonably necessary tests and
constructing the ]
4. Term. .hall be five (5) years commencing on the date Lessee begins construction czrrz:.crc!r2 c. pcratlc, n of the
Lessee Facilities ?aragraph 6(a)) or July 1, :2002, whichever first occurs ("Commencement Date") and terminating on the fifth
anniversary (the "Term") unless otherwise terminated as provided in Paragraph 10. Lessee shall have the right to extend
the Term for five (5) successive five (5) year periods (the "Renewal Terms") on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein. This Agreement
shall automatically be extended for each successive Renewal Term unless Lessee notifies Lessor of its intention not to renew prior to commencement
of the succeeding Renewal Term. The uhrase 'begins construction' (as used ia Para,roof 4 above~ shall mean when Lessee has obtained all
permits, licenses and other necessary approvals to begin ennstrucfion of Lessee Facilities (as defined below) and has physically moved men
and equipment onto the Land for such construction.
5. Rent.
(a) Within thirty (30) days of the Commencement Date and on the first day of each month therea~er, Lessee shall pay to Lessor as
rent One Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1~400.00) per month ("Rent"). Rent for any fractional month at the beginning or at the
end of the Term or Renewal Term shall be prorated, Rent shall be payable to Lessor at 100 South Emerson Street. Mount Prosuect. Illinois
60056.
(b) Rent shall be increased on each anniversa~ of the Commencement Date by an amount equal to three percent 0%) of the
Rent then in effect for the previous year.
(c) At the commencement of this Agreement, Lessee shall deliver to Lessor a Performance Bond in the amount of Five
Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($5000.00), as security for faithful performance by Lessee of the terms, covenants and conditions of this
Agreement, which default is not cured by Lessee in accordance with Paragraph I0 below. Lessor shall vive Lessee written notice of its
intention to invade the Performance Bond and with that notice shall provide to Lessee, written documentation of the failure to perform
within thirty (30) days after the date of the occurrence which gives rise to Lessor's claim. Failure to provide such notice and documentation
within such period shall result in a waiver by Lessor of the rights under this subnaraeranh.
6. Facilities: Utilities: Access.
(a) Lessee has the right to erect, maintain and operate on the Premises communications facilities, including without
limitation an antenna tower or pole and foundation, utility lines, transmission lines, air conditioned equipment shelter(s), electronic
equipment, transmitting and receiving antennas, supporting equipment and structures thereto ("Lessee Facilities"). In connection
therewith, Lessee has the right to do all work necessary to prepare, maintain and alter the Premises for Lessee's business operations
and to install transmission lines connecting the antennas to the transmitters and receivers. All of Lessee's construction and installation
work shall be performed at Lessee's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike manner. Tire to the Lessee Facilities shall
be held by Lessee. All of Lessee Facilities shall remain Lessee's personal property and are not fixtures. Lessee has the fight to remove
all Lessee Facilities at its sole expense on or before the expiration or earl/er termination of the Agreenaent; provided, Lessee repairs
any damage to the Premises caused by such removal. Upon termination of this Agreement, Lessee shall not be required to remove any
foundation more than one (1) foot below grade level. Lessee shall provide Lessor with a copy of Lessec'S plans ("Plans") for approval
prior to construction. Lessor shall give such annroval, which enoraval shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned, or
provide Lessee with its requests for changes within ten (10) business days of Lessor's.receipt of Lessee Plans. If Lessor does not nrovide
such approval or request for changes within such ten (10) business day period, Lessor shall be deemed to have approved the Plans. Lessor
shall not be entitled to receive any additionnl consideration in exchange for giving its approval of Lessee's Plans. In addition. Lessor
acknowledges and consents to Lessee entering into a separate Antenna Site License A~reement with VoieeStream Wireless, Inc. to olaee its
antennas on VoiceStream Wireless's tower adiacent to the Premises.
(b) Lessee shall pay for the electricity it consumes in its operations at the rate charged by the servicing utility company. Lessee shall
have the right to draw electricity and other utilities from the existing utilities on the Land or obtain separate utility service from any utility company
that will provide service to the Land (including a standby power generator for Lessee's exclusive use). Lessor agrees to sign such documents or
easements as may be required by said utility companies to provide such service to the Premises, including the grant to Lessee or to the servicing
utility company at no cost to the Lessee, of an easement in, over across or through the Land as required by such servicing utility company to provide
utility services as provided herein. Any easement necessary for such power or other utilities will be at a location acceptable to Lessor and the
servicing utility company.
(c) Lessee, Lessee's employees, agents, subcontractors, lenders and invitees shall have access to the Premises without notice to
Lessor twenty~four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, at no charge. Lessor grants to Lessee, and its agents, employees, conh'acturs, guests and
invitees, a non-exclusive right and easement for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress across that portion of the Land described in Exhibit B.
IL 3091-B Melas park Gene / LeAane 1 03/15/2001 10:47
AM
lq. 42-04-00.8 / W. 087-57-36.7
(d) Lessor shall maintain all access roadways fi.om the nearest public roadway to the Premises in a manner sufficient to allow pedestrian
and vehicular aceess at all times under normal weather conditions. Lessor shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing such roadway, at its sole
expense except for any damage caused by Lessee's use of such roadways.
7. Interference.
(a) Lessee shall operate the Lessee Facilities
the Land, provided that their installations predate that of the Lessee Facilities. All o with all Federal
Communications Commission ("FCC") requirements.
(b) Subsequent to the installation of the Lessee to install new
equipment on the Land or
operations. Such interference shall be ~ take all reasonable
steps necessary
8. of such taxes directly attributable to the Lessee
Facilities. The parties to this Agreement hereby
from the Land
(iii)
nrovidinn to Lessee the documentation from the taxin~ authoritY, reasonably acceptable to Lessee,
indicating that the change in status is directly attributable to Lassee's improvements on the Premises. Both parties hereto anree that Lessee
will not be responsible for any taxes owed prior to the commencement of this Aerecment.
9. Waiver of Lessor's Lieu.
(a) Lessor waives any lien rights it may have concerning the Lessee Facilities which are deemed Lessee's personal property and not
fixtures, end Lessee has the right to remove the same at any time without Lessor's consent.
0o) Lessor acknowledges that Lessee has entered into a financing arrangement including promissory notes and financial and security
agreements for the financing of the Lessee Facilities (the "Collateral") with a third party financing entity (and may in the future enter into additional
financing arrangements with other financing entities). In conneetiun therewith, Lessor (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral; (ii) disclaims
any interest in the Collateral, as fixtures or otherwise; and (iii) agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt fi.om execution, foreclosure, sale, levy,
attachment, or distress for any Rant due or to become due and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal
proceedings.
10. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated without further liability on thirty (30) days prior written notice as follows: (i) by either
party upon a default ofeny covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty (60) days of receipt of written notice
of default, provided that the grace period for any monetary default is ten (10) days from receipt of notice; or (ii) by Lessee for any reason or for no
reason, provided Lessee delivers written notice of early termination to Lessor no later than thirty (30) days prior to the Commencement Date; or (iii)
by Lessee if it does not obtain or maintain any license, permit or other approval necessary for the annstmctinn and operation of Lessee Facilities; or
(iv) by Lessee if Lessee is unable to occupy and utilize the Premises due to an action of the FCC, including without 1/mitation, a take back of
channels or change in frequencies; or (v) by Lessee if Lessee determines that the Premises are not appropriate for its operations for economic or
technological reasons, including, without limitation, signal interference.
11. Destruction or Condemnation. If the Premises or Lessee Facilities are damaged, destroyed, anndemned or transferred in lieu of
condemnation, Lessee may elect to terminate this Agreement as of the date of the damage, destmctinn, eondanmation or transfer in lieu of
condemnation by giving notice to Lessor no more then futCy-five (45) days following the date of such damage, destruction, condemnation or transfer
in lieu of condemnation. If Lessee chooses not to terminate this Agreement, Rent shall be reduced or abated in proportion to the actual reduction or
abatement of use of the Premises.
12. insurance. Lessee, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, shall procure and maintain on the Premises and on the Lessee Facilities, bodily
in.~ury and property damage insurance with a combined single limit of at least One Million and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence. Such
insurance shall insure, on un occurrence basis, against all liability of Lessee, its employees and agents arising out of or in eunnectiun with Lessee's
use of the Premises, all as provided for herein. Lessor shall be named as an additional insured on Lessee's policy. Lessee shall provide to Lessor a
certificate of insurance evidencing the coverage required by this paragraph within thirty (30) days of the Commencement Date.
13. Waiver of Subronation. Lessor and Lessee release each other and their respective principals, employees, representatives and agents, from
any claims for damage to any person or to the Premises or to the Lessee Facilities thereon caused by, or that result fi.om, risks insured against under
any insurance policies carried by the parties and in force at the time of any such damage. Lessor and Lessee shall cause each insurance policy
obtained by them to provide that the insurance company waives all right of recovery by way of subrogation against the other in connection with any
damage covered by any policy. Neither Lessor nor Lessee shall be liable to the other for any damage caused by fire or any of the rinks/nsured
against under any insurance policy required by Paragraph 12.
14. Assignment and Sublettine; Lessee may assign this Agreement or sublet or license the Premises or any portion thereof to an entity upon
written notification to Lessor by Lessee, subject to the assignee assuming all of Lessee's obligations herein. Upon assignment or subletting, Lessee
shall be relieved of all-future performance, liabilities, and obligations under this Agreement. Lessee shall have the right to sublet this Agreement
without Lessur's consent. Lessor may assign this Agreement upon written notice to Lessee, subject to the assignee assuming all of the Lassor's
obligations herein, including but not limited to, those set forth in Paragraph 9 ("Waiver of Leseor's Lien") above. This Agreement shall nm with the
property and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, personal representatives, heirs and assigns.
Notwithstanding anything to the enntrary anntalned in this Agreement, Lessee may assign, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer
without notice or consent its interest in this Agreement to any financing entity, or agent on behalf of any fmuncing entity to whom Lessee (i) has
obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof, (ii) has obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments,
or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof.
15. Warrantg of Title and Quiet Enjoyment. Lessor warrants that: (i) Lessor owns the Land in fee simple and has rights of access thereto
and the Land is free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and resffictions; (ii) Lessor has full right to make and perform this Agreement; and (iii)
Lessor covenants and agrees with Lessee that upon Lessee paying the Rent and observing and performing all the terms, covenants and conditions on
IL3091-B MelssPark Gene/LeAnne 2 03/1512001 10:47
AM
N. 42-044)0.8 / W. 087-57-36.7
Lessee's part to be observed and performed, Lessee may peacefully and quietly enjoy the Premises. Lessor agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
Lessee from any and all claims on Lesson's leasehold interest.
16. Repairs. Lessee shall not be required to make any repairs to the Premises or Land unless such repairs shall be necessitated by reason of
the ~efanlt or neglect of Lessee. Except as set forth in Paragraph 6(a) above, upon expimtiun or termination hereof, Lessee shall restore the Premises
to the condition in which it existed upon execution hereof-reasonable wear and tear and loss by casualt) [ Lessce's control,
excepted.
17. Hazardous Substances. Lessee agrees that it will not use, generate, store or dispose about or within
the Land in violation of any law or regulation. Lessor represents, warrants and agrees (1 any third
party has used, generated, stored or disposed of, or permitted the use ~ on,
under, about or within the Land in violation of any it any third party to use,
generate, store or dispose of an) Lessor and Lessee
each agree to defend, indemnify and and all losses,
liabilities, claims and/or costs (including
contained in this product, asbestos, any
, substance, chemical or waste that
is identified as This paragraph shall survive the termination
18.
(a) between the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations
and other ~ Any amendments to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by both
parties.
Co) If any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable with respect to uny party, the remainder of this Agreement or the
application of such provision to persons other than those as to whom it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected and each provision of
this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
(0 This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and permitted assignees of the respective parties.
(d) Any notice or demand required to be given herein shall be made by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or reliable
overnight courier to the address of the respective parties set forth below:
Lessor: Village of Mount Prospect Lessee: Nextel West Corp.
I00 South Emerson Street 400 West Grand Avenue
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Elmhurst, Illinois 60126
Atm.: Site Development Manager
With a copy to: Nextel Communications, Inc.
2001 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 20191-3436
Sixth Floor, Mail Stop 6E630
Atm.: Site Leasing Services, Contracts Manager
Lessor or Lessee may from time to time designate any other address for this purpose by written notice to the other party. All notices hereunder shall be
deemed received upon actual receipt.
(e) This Agreement shall ha governed by the laws of the State of Illinois.
(f) Lessor acknowledges that a Memorandum of Agreement in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit C will be recorded by Lessee in
the official records of the County where the Land is located. In the event the Land is encumbered by a mortgage or deed of trust, Lessor agrees to
obtain and furnish to Lessee, a non-disturbance and attomment instrument for each such mortgage or deed of trust.
(g) Lessee may obtain title insurance on its interest in the Land. Lessor shall cooperate by executing documentation required by the
title insurance company.
(h) In any case where the approval or consent of one party hereto is required, requested or otherwise to be given under this
Agreement, such party shall not unreasonably delay or withhold its approval or consent.
(i) Ail Riders and Exhibits annexed hereto form material parts of this Agreement.
This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.
LESSOR: LESSEE:
yillage of Mount Prospect, Nextal West Corp., a Delaware corporation,
an Illinois municipal corporation d/b/a Nextel Communications
By: By:
Gerald L. Farley Timothy A. Thompson
Date: Date:
Title: Mayor Title: Vice President En~ineefine
Tax ID:
IL3091-B Melaspark Geee/LeAnne 3 03/15/2001 10:47
AM
N. 42-04-00.8 / W. 087-57-36.7
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF LAND
to the Agreement dated . ,2000, by and between Village of Mount Prospect, an Illinois m~miei.nal eorporati6,, as
Lessor, and Nextel West Corp., a De]aware corporation, d/b/a Nextel Communications, as Lessee.
The Land is described and/or depicted as follows: ~
and commonly known as: 1700 West Central, Mount Prosoect. Illinois 60056
P.I.N.#: 03-33-300-078
IL 3091-B Melas Park Gene / LeAnne 4
AM 03/15/200I 10:47
N. 42-04-00.11 / W. 087-57-36.7
EXHIBIT B
DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
to the Agreement dated ,2000, by and between Village of Mount Prnsoeet~ an Illinois municioal eorboration, as
Lessor, and Nextel West Corp., a Delaware corporation, dfo/a Nextel Communications, as Lessee. ~
The Premises are described and/or depicted as follows:
1700 West Central. Mount Prosoect, Illinois 60056
Notes:
1. This Exhibit may be replaced by a land survey of the Premises once it is received by Lessee.
2. Setback of the Premises from the Land's boundaries shall be the distance required by the applicable govemmantal authorities.
3. Width of access road shall be the width required by the applicable governmental authorities, including police and fire departments.
4. The type, number and mounting positions and locations of antennas and transmission lines are illustrative only. Actual types,
numbers, mounting positions may vary from what is shown above.
1L309I-B Mclaspark Gene/LeAnne $ 03/15/2001 10:47
AM
N. 42-04-00.8 / W. 057-57-36.7
EXHIBIT C
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
CLERK: Please return this document to: Nextel West Corp.
400 West Grand Avenue
Elmhurst, Illinois 60126
Attu: Site Development Manager
This Memorandum of Agreement
with an office at
400 West Grand Avenue
I. Lessor Lease Agreement on the day of
200
and terminating.
year options to renew.
3. leased to Lessee
(the "Premises") is described in Exhibit B annexed hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partk y and year first above written.
LESSOR:
Village of Mount Prospect, .~i West Corp., a Delaware corporation,
d/b/a Noxtel Communications
By: __ By:
Name: __ Name: Timothy A. Thompson
Title: Mayor Title: Vice President Engineering
Date: Date:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On , before me Notary Public, personally appeared , personally
known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity upon
behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(SnAL)
Notary Public
My commission expires:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared ,
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person, or the entity
upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(SEAL)
Notary Public
My commission expires:
IL3OgI-B M¢lasPark Gese/LeAnne 6 03/15/2001 10:47
AM
N. 42-04-00.8 / W. 08%57°36.7
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 20, 2001
SUBJECT: PROPOSED SPRINT PCS LEASE- 1700 W. CENTRAL
In the agenda packet for this evening is a proposed lease from Sprint PCS and a staff
memorandum recommending a Village Board denial of the proposed lease since Sprint
PCS had not previously included a $5000 performance bond. The performance bond
request is standard in all Village leases with wireless carriers to ensure the leased site is
restored upon termination of the lease even if the lessee is bankrupt and unable to restore
the site. At the time of the lease proposal from Sprint PCS such a performance bond was
not included in the lease document, however, as of late Monday, March 19, Sprint
reconsidered and included the performance bond as previously requested.
Therefore, I would revise my recommendation from a March 16, 2001 memorandum. I
would recommend the Village enter into a lease agreement with Sprint PCS for a ground
site and antenna at 1700 W. Central in an initial monthly lease amount of $750 to be
increased 3% annually.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
DAVID STRAHL
H:\GEN\Utilities\Sprint Cover Memo 2.doc
Village of MoUnt Prospect
Mount ProsPect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 16, 2001
SUBJECT: SPRINT PCS PROPOSED LEASE - 1700 W. CENTRAL ROAD
Spdnt PCS has proposed to lease a ground space location and space on the antenna at the Public
Works facility, 1700 W. Central. Spdnt PCS could potentially be the third wireless carder at the site.
Negotiations between the Village and Sprint PCS have been undertaken through a third party,
Richard Riley & Associates. Sprint through their representatives have offered a monthly lease in the
amount of $750 per month increasing by 3% annually. As part of the co-location lease between
Spdnt PCS and VoiceStream, the owner of the monopole at the Public Works facility, Spdnt will
also provide the Village 25% of the lease amount that Spdnt has to pay VoiceStream for tocating on
the monopole. The additional lease amounts to $275 which also increases by 3% annually.
The Village has two leases with VoiceStream and a pending lease with Nextel in which the Village
demanded and received a performance bond in the amount of $5000 from each carrier to cover
any site restoration costs in case the wireless carder files for bankruptcy or does not have the
assets available to restore the site after terminating service. Such a bond appears reasonable since
the wireless market is very fluid and bankruptcies and other unfortunate business situations are
quite likely. A bond protects the Village from having to utilize available funds for site restoration if
the wireless lessee is financially unable to perform.
While the lease terms that Sprint PCS proposed appear favorable, the current position of Sprint's
refusal to post the requested $5000 performance bond, while the Village has received such a bond
from the other wireless providers raises a significant question of whether the Village Board should
approve the proposed lease. I would recommend against approving a lease between Sprint
PCS and the Village of Mount Prospect for ground and antenna space at t700 W. Central
until the requested $5000 performance bond is provided. Of course, the Village Board has the
authority to approve the lease without the requested performance bond.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
DAVID STRAHL
H:\GEN\Utilities\Sprint Lease PW Site Lease Memo.doc ¢ '
VWL
~1~01
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SPRINT PCS AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WIRELESS ANTENNA AT 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is the owner of property located at 1700 West Central
Road; and
WHEREAS, the property referenced herein is used for the operations of the Mount Prospect Public
Works Department; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the best interests of the Village would be served by leasing
ground space on the property to Sprint PCS for the purpose of installing a wireless antenna and
necessary ground support devices on said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
authorize execution of a Lease between Sprint PCS and the Village of Mount Prospect for the
purpose of permitting a wireless antenna and necessary ground support devices to be located on
the Village owned property located at 1700 West Central Road, a copy of the lease attached hereto
and hereby made a part hereof as "Exhibit A."
SECTION TWO:- This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2001.
Gerald L..Fa?ey .
Mayor ....
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM CHF 01-29
CONTROL NUMBER
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: ACTING CH]t~F OF POLICE IN~-C~-V~y
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR THE PURCHASE OF 12 KUSTOM SIGNAL
CAMERA SYSTEMS UNDER THE STATE BID AWARD
DATE: MARCH 6, 2001
Police Department Request
The Police Department is requesting Village Board authorization to purchase twelve (12) in-car
video camera systems at a total cost not to exceed $50,000.00.
Discussion
The use of in-car video and recording systems serve four distinct purposes. First, the recordings
serve as evidence in support of an officer's actions in field encounters and arrests. Second,
recordings serve a training function. Third, the recordings may be viewed in the context of
officer safety. Finally, recordings may be used for management purposes whereby they can
preclude, substantiate or unfound complaints about an officer's demeanor, activities or actions:
Primarily the system will be used to record traffic stops, especially those traffic stops involving
hazardous moving violations, arrests or high-risk situations. It also may be used to review the
traffic stop procedures and practices followed by individual patrol officers. Finally, it may be
used, consistent with statutory and judicial restraints, to record the actions and words of persons
in the patrol squad car.
Currently the department has one in-car video recording system manufactured by Alpha Control.
The system, an Alpha Cam 2000, was obtained by the department in 1996. Although the system
has experienced technical difficulties from time to time, it has given the department and its
members an opportunity to become familiar with its use and the benefits of this relatively new
technology.
Product Comparison
During the course of researching in-car video systems; three products were evaluated. These
systems, available through Kustom Siguals, Mobile Vision and Apogee ludustries, are currently
the most widely used in-car video systems in the area. All systems shared the following
features: LCD display, 1.0 Lux level, minimum of 12x optical magnification, 5-7 years system
Page I of 3
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER
life expectancy, on site equipment training, and a minimum of a one (1) year warranty. The
systems sold by Kustom Signals and Mobile Vision used the standard VHS format. The system
sold by Apogee Industries, a licensed reseller for Decatur, used the 8mm format. The Decatur
system offers a full two-year warranty while the Kustom Signal offers a free second year
warranty when the purchaser uses Kustom Signal videotapes exclusively. Mobile Vision offers a
second year warranty at an additional cost. Both the Kustom Signals and Mobile Vision systems
utilize camera and control equipment located in the driver's compartment, with the video
recorder secured in a locked case within the vehicle's trunk. The Decatur system has all
components installed within the driver's compartment, with a keyed compartment for the video
recorder.
Currently the Kustom Signals system is offered under state bid, while neither the Mobile Vision
nor the Decatur system is available under state bid. The full Kustom Signals system price is
$3,629.00, the Mobile Vision system is priced at 3,795.00 and the Decatur system offered by
Apogee Industries is priced at $4,295.00. It should be noted the Kustom Signal price includes
installation at an authorized factory installer such as Lurid or Custom Vehicle Systems.
Installation costs for the Mobile Vision system is an additional $200.00 and must be installed at
one of the above authorized factory installation locations. With the Decatur system installation
is the purchaser's responsibility.
In addition to purchasing in-car video systems, the department will purchase the following
equipment; 60 microphones and pouch holders to be assigned to individual officers, six (6)
additional radio transmitters, 600 blank video tapes, one (1) bulk video eraser, and two TV/VCR
combination units to allow review of video tapes by supervisors.
Attached is a. comparison o? the in-car systems evaluated listing their features and costs. Also
attached are quotations received from Kust0m Signal indicating the prices of the in-car video
systems and related equipment to be purchased.
Conclusion & Recommendation
In determining which system comes closest to meeting the needs of the department the following
factors were evaluated: tape format and security, system pricing, warranty, serviceability and
actual use in the field by police agencies. Based on these factors staffhas concluded the Kustom
Signals system best meets department needs. The VHS format used by the Kustom System has
been in use for several years, and offers up to eight hours of recording time compared to the 4-5
hours recording time for the 8mm tape system which bas been available only since November
2000. A locked compartment within the vehicle trunk provides tape security for the Kustom
Signals product. Like the Decatur system, a two-year wad-anty is provided by Kustom Signa1~
when their videotapes are used exclusively with their system. The second year wan-anty is
provided by Mobile Visions at an additional price. In regards to price, the Kustom Signals
system with installation is $366.00 less than the Mobile Visions unit (installed) and
approximately $666.00 less than the Decatur system (not installed.) It should also be noted the
Knstom Signal system has been in use by the Illinois State Police for well over a year and has
Page 2 of 3
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER
performed satisfactorily. The Kustom Signal system is currently available to the department
under the state bid, thus eliminating the need for a bidding process.
In conclusion, based on system features, system service and price it is staff's recommendation to
purchase the Kustom Signals system. The purchase of these twelve (12) in-car video systems
and related equipment will be funded by monies available by the Illinois First grant currently
held by the Village.
MS/ms
Attachment
Acting Chief of Police
Page 3 of 3
TO:
FROM: MICHAEL J. FIGOLAH, FIRE CHIE~
DATE: MARCH 7, 200'1
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF BID- UNIFORMS
The Fire Department annually contracts for uniforms for sworn firefighters.
Uniform specifications were sent out for bid proposals every year until 1995. Kale
Uniform has provided uniforms since that time because they have not increased
prices and provided good service.
There are only three vendors that have responded with uniform bids within the last
ten years: Kale Uniform, Crest Uniform and R&R Uniform. In 1992 R&R provided
uniforms with unsatisfactory performance. In 1993 Kale was selected over R&R
because of service even though their price was slightly higher. In 1994 Kale's
price was lower than Crest and in 1995 Kale was the only vendor to respond to bid
requests.
The Fire Department has requested a waiver of bid for uniforms for the last 5
years. Kale°s current pdcing and quality of uniforms has been meeting the needs
of the department. Sworn firefighters receive an annual $450 allowance for
uniform replacement according to their labor agreement. In 2000 the department
spent a total of $15,000 on uniforms with Kale. This amount is expected to be
slightly higher this year due to recent new-hires, but will not exceed the $450.00
per individual up to the Village's authorized staffing levels.
It is my recommendation to waive the bid process and purchase the 2001 uniforms
from Kale Uniform as a sole source vendor.
MF
cc: Finance Director
H:V~rchives\03 March\MF-Waiver of Bid Uniforms-Village Manager.doc
MINUTES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COFFEE WITH COUNCIL
SATURDAY, MARCH 10, 2001
9:00 A.M.
2na Floor Conference Room, Village Hall
The meeting was convened at 9:00 a.mi Those present were Mayor Gerald Farley, Trustees Timothy
Corcomn, Paul I-Ioefert, Richard Lohrstorfer, Dennis Prikkel, Michaele Skowron and Irvana Wilks.
Representing staff were Village Manager Michael Janonis and Director of Finance Douglas
Ellsworth:
Residents in Attendance:
Carol Tortorello 223 S. Elmhurst Rd.
Elmer Collin 1 W. Hiawatha Trail
Martha Ruetsche 610 N. Fairview Ave.
James Ruetsche 610 N. Fairview Ave.
Pankaj Parikh 401 S. Emerson St.
David Schein 512 S. NaWaTa
Richard Hendricks Twin Lakes, WI.
Trustee Dennis Prikkel: Trustee Prikkel reported that there was a separation of the sidewalk at 107
N. Main Street that could be a tripping hazard. He also said there was a sidewalk hazard at the
southeast comer of Thayer and Main Street.
Trustee Michaele Skowron: Trustee Skowron reported that there is still a Route 83 Detour sign
going eastbound on Central Road. She said the sign is actually behind the fence on the Norwood
property, but suggested we arrange to have the sign removed.
Ms. Carol Tortorello, 223 S. Eimhurst Avenue: Ms. Tortorello requested an update on the status
of Randhurst Mall. There was general discussion about the conditions at Randhurst as well as the
impact of the soft retail market. It was suggested that the Village look for opportunities to assist
Rouse/Randhurst by looking at ways to improve land use around the mall.
Ms. Tortorello asked about the Louis Velaseo Beautification Fund. Trustee Skowron stated that it is
still in the planning stage.
Mr. Elmer Collin, 1 W. Hiawatha Trail: Mr. Collin did not have anything specific to talk about.
He said he enjoys coming to Coffee with Council to listen and converse with the Board.
Mr. James Ruetsche, 610 N. Fairview Avenue: Mr. James Ruetsche came to the Coffee with
Council with his mother, Ms. Martha Ruetsche, to request that he be re-appointed to the Youth
Commission. Mayor Farley stated that appointments cannot be made at the Coffee with Council, but
the re-appointment would be made at an upcoming Board meeting.
Coffee with Council Minutes
March 10, 2001
Page Two
There was general discussion about the quality of schools in Mount Prospect and the many
challenges facing the youth of America. There was also discussion about the Character Counts
program being initiated by the local governments in Mount Prospect. Mayor Farley suggested that
we put up street banners to promote Character Counts. Mr. Janonis said that staff is working on
getting banners.
Mr. David Schein, 512 S. NaWaTa: Mr. 8ehein inquired about what responsibilities and
obligations the Village would have as part of the Des Plaines Watershed Study. Mayor Farley said
the Village is cooperating and participating in the study, but the obligations and responsibilities have
not been determined yet.
Mr. Sehein inquired as to whose responsibility it is to clean up after automobile accidents. He said
there was an accident on his block, and he and his neighbors had to clean up the broken glass.
Trustee Corcoran stated that the tow truck driver is suppose to clean up the broken glass when a tow
truck is called to the scene of the accident. There was a question as to who cleans it up ifa tow track
is not called. Mayor Farley questioned whether or not the Village sends out the street sweeper. Mr.
Janonis said he would find that information out. Trustee Wi[ks asked if we were going to have a
Spring Village cleanup. Mr. Janonis said that the Public Works Department is changing over to its
Spring/Summer operations. He further said that he has asked employees to pick up larger items of
debris if they see such on the side of the road as they drive around the Village.
Mr. Schein also suggested the Village have Police direct traffic after big events at Prospect High
School.
Mr. Schein asked Mayor Farley if individuals under the age of 21 can purchase non-alcoholic beer.
Mayor Farley said they could not.
Mr. Richard Hendrieks, Twin Lakes, Wisconsin: Mr. Hendrieks asked if the Board received a
copy of his letter asking for a motion. Trustee Hoefert stated that the Board did receive a copy of the
letter.
Mr. Hendricks wished the Board well with the upcoming election.
Mr. Pankaj Parikh, 401 S. Emerson: Mr. Janonis started out by saying that Mr. Parikh is here
because he is trying to put together a Mount Prospect relief effort for the victims of the earthquake in
India. Mr. Parikh was hoping the Village would sponsor the event, in conjunction with a local bank.
Mr. Janonis said that LaSalle Bank is willing to open an account for the relief effort, but that they
require someone serve to as trustee of the account. Mr. Janonis further said that the Village
offee with Council Minutes
March 10, 2001
Page Three
Board would have to approve of such an arrangement. Mr. Parilda said that he would be willing to
research the best ways to use the monies.
Mayor Farley inquired as to why Mr. Parikh did not want to use the International Red Cross or
another established not-for-prufit corporation. Mr. Parikh said those organizations have overhead,
and that this way, they can be assured all the money goes to a specific project.
Trustee Skowron expressed the opinion that we should use an existing organization. Trustee Prikkel
agreed, saying that there is also the World Relief Organization that provides long-term relief
programs.
Trustee Wilks asked why Mr. Parikh did not want to serve as trustee of the bank account. Mr. Parikh
said he did not think about it.
Trustee Lorhstorfer expressed the opinion that the Village should support the relief program but not
serve as the main organizer. Mayor Farley recommended we use a reputable, established charitable
agency to accept the donations so that the donations are tax-deductible. He said the organization
chosen should be able to identify specific projects that the Mount Prospect funds would be used for.
The Board asked the Village Manager to work with Mr. Parikh on researching established not-for-
profit organizations. Trustee Skowrnn suggested the Rotary Club be considered, rather than a
specific church. She said the project might get wider community support if it wasn't tied to a
specific denomination.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 a.m.
Douglas R. Ellsworth, CPA
Director of Finance
I:\Corresp~Intl~200 l\CoffeeCouncil - 3-10.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE COMMISSION
AGENDA
Thursday, March 22, 2001
7:00 p.m.
Village Hall Budding
100 South Emerson Street
2~ Floor Conference Room
I Call to Order
II Approval of Minutes - Meeting of January 25, 2001
III Discussion Regarding Building Permit Process and Permit Fee Increase
IV Discussion Regarding Human Services Department Programs, Resource
Allocation and Long-Term Funding
V Discussion Regarding Multiple Bond Ratings
VI Discussion Regarding Credit/Debit Card Acceptance
VII Other Business
VIII Chairman's Report
IX Finance Director's Report
X Next Meeting: Thursday, April 26, 2001, 7:00 p.m.
XI Adjournment
NOTE: Any individual who would like to attend this meeting but because of a disability needs
some accommodation to participate should contact the Finance Director's Office at 100 South
Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, (847) 392-6000, ext. 5277, TDD (847) 392-6064.
FINANCE CO~SSION
~ OF ~ MEETING
JANUARY 25, 2001
VILLAGE I~ALL BUILDING
I. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Those present included Chairman John Korn and
Commissioners Charles Bennett, George Busse, Vince Grochocinski, Tom Pekras and Ann Smilanic.
Also present were Finance Director Douglas Ellsworth, Deputy Finance Director Carol Widmer and
Finance Administrative Assistant Lisa Burkemper.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Ann Smilanic motioned to approve the minutes of October 26, 2000 seconded by
Commissioner Tom Pekras, the minutes were accepted as presented.
Commissioner Charles Bennett motioned to approve the minutes of November 2, 2000 seconded by
Commissioner Vince Grochocinski, the minutes were accepted as presented.
III. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED 2001 WORK PLAN
Chairman John Korn stated that he felt the budget work plan followed last year by the Finance
Commission worked well. Chairman Korn then asked the commission if there was a need to meet
in February. By unanimous vote the commission decided to cancel the meeting scheduled for
February 22nd.
Following a discussion the Finance Commission drafted an agenda for the 2001 meeting schedule,
attached is a summary of that agenda.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business discussed.
V. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
Chairman John Korn began his report by announcing that Commissioner Betty Launer had resigned
as of December 31, 2000. Mr. Korn asked that with elections coming up does the commission want
to reorganize and hold an election for Vice Chairman and Secretary. Unanimously the commission
agreed to continue with George Busse as Vice Chairman and Vince Grochocinski as Secretary.
Chairman Korn advised the commission that the Village Board is now utilizing a Consent Agenda and
then explained the process to the commission members.
Cha'u-man Korn mentioned that he was dissatisfied with the way the Historical Society asked the
Village Board for additional money for their budget at the last minute during the budget presentafxon.
The commission agreed with Chairman Kom's concern regarding the manner in which they asked for
the increase in funds for their budget. Commissioner George Busse motioned to direct Chairman John
Kom to write a letter to the Board regarding the commissions concerns, Commissioner Ann Smilanic
seconded the motion and the motion carried. Furthermore, Commissioner Charles Bennett motioned
to ask the Historical Society to present their budget during the normal budget process. Commissioner
Tom Pekras seconded the motion and the motion carried.
VI. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Finance Director Douglas Ellsworth banded out final copies of the 2001 Budget to the commission
members along with a copy of the Park Ridge Survey. Mr. Ellsworth noted that 12 cities participated
in the survey this year.
Commissioner Ann Smilanic asked Mr. Ellsworth if the utility revenues will be going up because of
the increased gas prices. Mr. Ellsworth stated that there is a two-month delay in receiving the
revenue therefore no increase has been realized yet.
VII. NEXT MEETING: MARCH 22, 2001
Commissioner George Busse motioned to adjourn and Commissioner Charles Bennett seconded, the
meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. The February 22~ meeting was cancelled. The next meeting will
be March 22~.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa Burkemper
Adm'mistrative Assistant
Finance Department
VILLAGE OF M0~T PROSPECT
FINANCE COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEMS FOR 2001
As of January 25, 2001
January 25, 2001
· Development of 2001 Workplan
Februar~ 22~ 2001
· MEETING CANCELLED
March 22, 2001
· Community Development presentation on permit fee increases and what
improvements require permits.
· Human Services Department presentation regarding human service programs and
resource allocation, and also the long-term funding and prioritizing of programs.
April 26, 2001
· Pre-Budget Meetings
May 24, 2001
· Pre-Budget Meetings
~lune 28, 2001
* Review Draft Capital Improvements Program
July 26, 2001
· Mid-year Budget Review
· Review of 2000 Annual Audit
August 23, 2001
· Agenda items to be determined
FINANCE COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEMS FOR 2001
September 27, 2001
· Agenda items to be determined
October 11, 2001
· Review Proposed Budget
October 18, 2001
· Review Proposed Budget
October 25~ 2001
· Review Proposed Budget
November 1, 2001
· Review Proposed Budget
November 22, 2001
· MEETING CANCELLED.
December 6~ 200!
· Budget Wrap-up (tentative)
December 27, 2001
· MEETING CANCELLED.
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~amu~ Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
T o y3. oorco Viii
age of Mount Prospect
~c~d M. Lo~g~
~ ~. ~i~ Communi~ Development Department ~ho.~:847/392-6000
Mic~ele W. Sko~on Fax: 847/392-6022
~ ~. wi~s 100 Sou~ Emerson S~eet Mo~t Prqspect, Illinois 60056 ~: 847/392~064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
2~ Floor Conference Room Wednesday
Village Hall March 21,2001
100 South Emerson Street 7:00 p.m.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. March 7, 2001
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. PC-06-2000/Village Centre Phase 1-B Plat of Resubdivision (14 E. NW I-rwY)
Subdivide existing lots to create a three-lot subdivision
V. SUBDIVISIONS
None
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing: Review and adopt the Comprehensive Am~ual Performance
Evaluation Report (CAPER)
VII. COMMENTS/OIItER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some
accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at
100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
March 7, 2001
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael
Zadel at 7:07 p.m. atthe Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
Edwin Janus
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Antoinette Astreides
Bill Reddy
Village Staff Present: Judy Cormolly AICP, Senior Planner
Others in Attendance: Terry Franzen
Bob Reilly
Giuseppe Stanfa
Guiseppe Aiello
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chairman Zadel asked for comments or changes to the minutes from January 17, 2001. Carol Tonorello
moved to approve the minutes and Gary Grouwinkle seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-
0. Chairman Zadel asked staff to present the first case, PC-07-2000.
SUBDIVISIONS:
PC-07-2000/HINKLE SUBDIVISION (2120 WHITE OAK)
Judy Cormolly, Senior Planner, introduced the case, Hinkle Subdivision. She said that the petitioner
would like to subdivide the existing lot and create a two-lot subdivision at the northwest coruer of White
Oak and Prairie. She said that the petitioner created the lot sizes based on the existing house remaining
and having it meet current zoning setbacks, while still being able to construct a house on the proposed
second lot that would be consistent with current development trends. Ms. Connolly said that the
petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning regulations. She said that
theplat was prepared in accordance with Development code requirements. Therefore, Staff recommends
approval of the Hinkle Subdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner to present his request. Ouiseppe Stanfa said that he purchased the lot
with his brother-in-law and that they wanted to build a new house on the second lot and after researching
Village codes and regulations concerning the plat and future development, had prepared the plat
according to Village codes. Guiseppe Aiello added that he is a contractor and was involved with the
construction of the two new houses along Prairie. Plan Commission members asked about the
topography of the site and how the existing swale, combined with a new house, would impact the adjacent
houses. Mr. Aiello said that the swale is on the lot adjacent to the 2120 property and that there would be
minimal impact on the neighborhood. There was further discussion that clarified the location of the
property lines.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
Grouwinkle moved to approve the Hinkle Subdivision and Ed Janus seconded the motion. The plat was
approved 5-0.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 2
March 7, 2001
PC-01-01/METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PLAT OF SUBDIVIISON (2440 E. RAND ROAD)
Chairman Zadel asked Ms. Counolly to introduce the next case, Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of
Subdivision. She said that the petitioner received Village Board approval to rezone the subject properties
and a Conditional Use permit to construct a drive-thru for the credit union. She said that the petitioner is
required to consolidate the lots in order to meet Village codes and as a condition of approval of the
Conditional Use permit. She said that the petifioner)s not seeking relief from Development Code
requirements and that the site will be constructed according to all Village regulations, in addition to
conditions listed as part of the ordinance granting the Conditional Use permit for items such as additional
landscaping and removing the billboard. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with
Development Code requirements and that stuff recommends approval of the plat.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he wanted to add to staffs report. Robert Reilly said that he
represents the petitioner, Metro Federal Credit Union, and that Iris client just closed on the property. He
said that the site would provide storm water detention as required by the Development Code and that all
other Village requirements will be met. There was discussion about how the parcel was originally created
by the County, the impact of changing the grading to construct the new building, and when the billboard
will be removed.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Carol
Tortorello moved to approve the Metro Federal Credit Union Plat of Subdivision and Gary Grouwinkle
seconded the motion. The plat was approved 5-0.
PC-03-01/FRANZEN'S RESUBDIVISION (319 N. PROSPECT MANOR)
Chairman Zadel asked Judy Counolly to present the next case, Franzen's Resubdivision. Ms. Connolly
said that there is an existing house and patio on the subject properties. She said that the site is comprised
of two lots of record and that the patio and part of the house were built over the lot line. She said that the
petitioner was required to meet applicable Village codes when he replaced an ex/sting patio and in order
to do so, was required to consolidate the separate lots of record. She said that the Franzen's
Resubdivision creates a one-lot subdivision and that the property would meet zoning setbacks. Ms.
Connolly said that the petitioner is not seeking relief from Development Code requirements or Zoning
regulations. She said that the plat was prepared in accordance with Development Code requirements and
that staffrecommends approval of the Franzen's Resubdivision.
Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner if he would like to elaborate on staff's report. Terry Franzen said
that he had the plat prepared to comply with Village codes and that he was not seeking relief from any
code regulations. Chairman Zadel said that the case was clear-cut and more of a "housekeeping" issue.
There was discussion about how the house could have been allowed to have been built over the lot line
and how regulations change over the years.
Chairman Zadel asked if there were any other questions or discussion. As there was none, Gary
Grouwinkle moved to approve the Franzen's Resubdivision and Matt Sledz seconded the motion. The
plat was approved 5-0.
PC-06-2000/VILLAGE CENTRE PHASE 1-B PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION (14 E. NW HWY)
Ms. Connolly said that this case would be presented at the next Plan Commission meeting when the plat
would have signatures from all the utility companies.
Mount Prospect Plan Commission page 3
March 7, 2001
OLD BUSINESS:
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS:
The Plan Commission discussed corridor improvements around St. Raymond's parking lot, at the
intersections of Golf/Rt, 83, and Rand/Central in addition to the status of the downtown redevelopment,
several commercial developments underway in the Village, and the impact of several anchor stores
closing at Randhurst.
At 7:45 p.m., Chairman Zadel asked for a motion to adjourn. The motion was approved by a voice vote
and the meeting was adjourned.
Judy Connolly AICP, Senior Planner
MAYOR ~
Gerald L, Farley VILLAGE MANAGER
Michael E. Jan0nis
TRUSTEES
TimothyJ. Cor¢oran Village of Mount Prospect .LLAOECLE
Paul Wm. Hocfert Velma W. Low¢
Richard M. Lohrstorfer
o iso. P kk l Community Development Department P 0n : 4,/s 8-532
Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/818-5329
~au~ K. win~s 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 r~)D: 847/392-6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
Senior Center Thursday
50 South Emerson Street March 22, 2001
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 7:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of January 25, 20001
ZBA-01-01 / 2440 E. Rand Road
2.ZBA-02-01 /2105 W. Prendergast
3.ZBA-03-01 / 609 Eastman
4.ZBA-04-01 / Text Amendments
IV. OLD BUSINESS
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA-05-01 / 617 N. Fairview / Anderson Residence / Variation for a side yard setback (shed).
NOTE: This case is Village Board final.
B. ZBA-06-01 / 1020 S. Linneman / Gettysburg Development / Map Amendment and Variation to create
(2) lots that have 63.23' lot widths. NOTE: The Map Amendment is Village Board final and the
Variation is ZBA final. POSTPONED TO 4/26/01
C. Elect a Vice Chair
VI. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but beCause of a disability needs some accommodation to
participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056,
847-392-6000, Ext. 5528~ TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO, ZBA-01-2001 Hearing Date: January 25, 2001
PETITIONER: Metro Federal Credit Union
260 N. Evergreen Ave.
Arlington Heights, IL 60004
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2440 E. Rand Road
PUBLICATION DATE: January 10, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Rezone from RX to B3 to allow construction ora bank and a Conditional Use
to allow a drive-thru facility
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Kathy West, Atty.
Richard Galenski
Brace Smith
Richard and Lorraine Hagen
Frank & Julie Greenan
James and Carolyn Blaszynski
Patricia Gibbons
Florence Salvestrini
Dolores Tomaszewski
Art Dieterich
Ed Madden
Lawson Rermie
Sal Fragale
David and Richard Matra
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the November 9, 2000 meeting were
approved. At 7:38, Chairperson Jumcek introduced Case ZBA-01-2001, a Map Amendment and Conditional Use to
allow construction of a drive-thru banking facility. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the
item, a Map Amendment and Conditional Use request to construct a diive-thru banking facility.
Ms. Cannolly described the subject property as two pamels that total just over 1.3 acres. She explained that the
property was a nursery/garden supply business that was and annexed into the Village in 1999, zoned RX Single Family
Residence at that time per the Zoning Ordinance. Metro Federal Credit Union would like to raze the existing
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-01-2001
Arlene Juracck, Chairperson Page 2
structures and build a bank that has three drive-thru lanes. Ms. Connolly said that in order to do so, the property has to
be rezoned to a commercial zoning district and receive approval of a Conditional Use permit for the drive-thru.
Ms. Connolly reported that Staff had reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, site plan, and landscape plan and visited
the site, and found that the existing land use is a former nursery/garden center, adjacent to another commercial use to
the west, and Old Orchard Country Club Development townhomes to the east. Ms. Connolly said the planned bank
facility is an appropriate use in the B3 district because the property is commercial in nature and adjacent to a
commercial use.
Ms. Connolly pointed out that the banking facility would be served by 23 parking spaces, which includes two-handicap
spaces. The parking lot and drive-thru lanes are designed with slightly wider traffic aisles in some areas and more
parking spaces than required by Village Code. She said that the site plan shows a dedicated let~-turn lane for
southbound Rand Road traffic to access the site and includes right-out and left-out lanes to exit the site. The desig~ of
the parking lot meets the requirements of Article 23 Off Street Parking and Loading of the Zoning Code.
Ms. Connolly stated that the landscape plan for the proposed parking lot and site shows 53% green space and that the
minimum amount of green space required for the site is 25%. She said that the interior and foundation plantings shown
on the Landscape Plan meet Zoning Code requirements, but that the perimeter landscaping does not meet the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Connolly noted that the plan must be revised to reflect the requirements of
the Village Zoning Ordinance, but also include a continuous three-foot hedge and shade trees 25-feet apart along the
east property line to ensure minimal impact on the adjacent residences. In addition, the landscaping along Rand Road
should be enhanced to include a continuous three-foot hedge that screens parked cars, but planted so as not to impact
the sight triangle. She said that the additional landscaping would provide a higher quality, safer development.
Ms. Connolly noted that the subject property is located along a major arterial road and that the property directly across
Rand Road is a golf course. She said that the corridor is a combination of commercial and open space and that the B3
zoning district and the proposed use of the site will be compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning districts. The
proposed landscaping and required enhancements of the subject property would significantly improve the appearance
of one of the Village's major arterial roadways. Therefore, the proposed zoning district and use of the property is
consistent with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Connolly explained that the proposed Conditional Use is a drive-thru facility attached to the bank. She said that
the location of the drive-thru is on the west side of the building, and is 145' from the adjacent residential property line.
She said that the building and additional landscaping will reduce noise from the drive-thru and that the drive-thru will
not be used after 7 p.m. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and with
all Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Ms. Connolly briefly described the proposal in terms of the Zoning Code standards. She said that based on this
analysis, the ZBA could make positive findings with respect to the standards for Map Amendments and Conditional
Use Standards. Therefore, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend approval of the project with the conditions
listed in Staff's memo.
Ms. Juracek asked if Zoning Board members had questions for Staff. As there were none, Chairperson Juracek asked
if the petitioner wanted to speak.
Kathy West, Esq., 123 Water Street in Naperville, Richard Maria, President of Metro Federal Credit Union, Lawson
Reimie, Architect, and Dennis Marra, CENCOM were sworn in.
Ms. West explained that the Metro Federal Credit Union serves employees of local government agencies. She said that
their office is presently located in Arlington Heights and that they want to build their own building at the Rand Road
site. The property will consist ora one-story building with a basement and that there will be one driveway offof Rand
Road. She said that the bank will have two drive-thru banking lanes and one ATM lane. There will be 23 parking
Zoning Board of Appeais ZBA-01-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
spaces although 19 are required and the entire site will have stormwater detention as required by Village Codes. Ms.
West said some residents expressed a desire for a fence along the east property line and said that would be acceptable
to Metro. She said that the lights will be the lighting box type and would be focused on the site and not spill onto the
adjacent properties. In addition, ail existing structures, including the billboard, will be razed. Ms. West said Metro has
a controlled membership of approximately 4,000 members since it serves only government entities and that only the
Credit Union members can use the ATM. She said that the business would generate approximately 60-90 daily visits
to the site. Ms. West said Metro agrees with the six conditions listed in the Staff memo and said that they feel the
facility will improve the site, which has been vacant and neglected for some time.
R/chard Matra, 260 N. Evergreen, President of Metro Credit Union, testified that the credit union was chartered in
1973 and has been in continuous operation since then. He said that the Credit Union has aiso been involved with
Mount Prospect government employees since its inception and includes Mount Prospect Park District employees, and
School District employees, including Northwest Special Education. Mr. Marra said Metro Credit Union is excited
about relocating to Mount Prospect. He pointed out their assets include 2.5 million dollars in local government
employee funds and that they have 1.5 million dollars in loans to local government employees.
Lawson Reanie, Architect with Redmond Company, testified that Metro is very sensitive to the residential
development to the east. He pointed out that Metro would erect a low profile, ail masonry, building in scale with the
residences to the east. The lower portion of the building will be decorative stone and the upper portion will be brick on
all four sides. Dimensional shingles will be used on the roof.
R/chard Rogers asked what material would be used on the "eyebrow" above the entry door. Mr. Reanie said it would
be EIFS. Mr. Rogers asked if they would substitute stucco for the EIFS. Mr. Rennie said they would be amenable to
that change, although stucco would cause more maintenance problems in the long tenn. He said they have done many
commercial buildings using EIFS without problems.
Hal Ettinger had concerns with cars' headlights disturbing neighbors to the north. I¢lr. Rennie said they would be
willing to add more landscaping or add a fence to the north property line to shield the lights.
Ms. Juracek asked if future plans included adding a second story to the building. Mr. Rennie said no, the building was
not designed to allow the addition of a second story.
Ms. Jumcek asked if any neighbors had come to address the Zoning Board regarding this case.
Dolores Tomaszewski, 904-A Persimmon Lane, President of the Old Orchard Homeowners Association, was sworn in.
She said the homeowners were pleased with this project but had several questions: (1) would the billboard be removed;
(2) what type of material and height would the proposed fence along the east property line be; and (3) how often would
the community room in the basement be used?
Ms. Connolly said that the Zoning Ordinance requires a solid screen fence at a minimum of 6' and that it could be
wood (stockade, basketwcave or board-on-board) or brick. The "good" side would need to face the Old Orchard
community. Ms. Tomaszewski said the 6' fence would be preferred, for privacy, and that they would want the fence to
be cedar. Mr. Blue added that the Zoning Ordinance allows one fence per propeity line and that individual fences
would need to be removed. Mr. Richard Marra said the billboard would be removed and that he anticipated the
community room would be used once or twice a month.
At 8:18, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board. Members
expressed their approvai of the project. Many said that it was very attractive and would be a real improvement to the
area.
At 8:24, Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for a Map Amendment from R-X
to B-3 to allow construction ora banking facility at 2440 E. Rand Rd. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-01-2001
Arlene Suracek, Chairperson Page 4
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0.
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for a Conditional Use for construction of
a drive-thru facility at the proposed bank at 2440 E. Rand Rd., with the six conditions listed in the Staff memo and two
additional conditions: (I) that additional landscaping be installed to screen headlights from the property north of the
site and (2) that a 6' wooden fence be installed along the east lot line. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and l'uracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0.
At 9:48 p.m., after three more cases were heard, Richard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith
Youngquist. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-02-200! Hearing Date: January 25, 2001
PETITIONER: Frank and Anna Panzarino
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2105 W. Prendergast
PUBLICATION DATE: January 10, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Variation to construct an enclosed structure in the rear yard setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Coanolly, AICP, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Frank and Anna Panzarino
Anthony Kies
Phil Cinantino
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the November 9, 2000 meeting were
apprOved. The Zoning Board heard Case ZBA-01-01 and at 8:25, Chairperson Juracek introduced Case ZBA-02-2001,
a Variation to enclose a structure in the rear yard setback. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the
case. She described the subject property as an existing home located on an interior lot on a single-family residential
street that abuts St. Cecilia Church. The attached garage is set back 30' from the front lot line and the primary
residence is set back almost 56' from the front lot line. Ms. Connolly said the applicants propose to construct a
33'x15' enclosed structure attached to the rear of the existing residence, which would be used in the same manner as an
enclosed 3-season room. The proposed structure will encroach 15-feet into the required 25-foot rear side yard setback
and requires a Variation because the structure would be located 10-foot from the rear lot line.
Ms. Connolly said the plans for this project show that the enclosed structure would be located along a portion of the
rear of the house and have a roof with skylights. The materials will match the existing house and include several large
windows. In their application, the petitioners state that the enclosed porch is necessary because their property is
adjacent to a detention pond and mosquitoes disturb them and limit the use of their yard. The petitioners feel that the
proposed addition will enhance the home and not adversely impact the adjacent properties.
Ms. Connolly explained that the Zoning Ordinance allows patios and decks to encroach into the rear setback 15',
leaving 10' open from the rear lot line. Although the petitioners propose to maintain the same setbacks as a patio or
deck, the intensity of the use differs because the proposed structure would be enclosed. Consequently, the bulk of the
house extends into the rear yard.
Ms. Coanolly said that, to conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey
and site plan and visited the site. The subject parcel is an 8,130 square foot parcel that is out of any flood zone and
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-02-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
rectangular. The applicants propose to construct a 33' x 15' enclosed structure in the rear setback to provide a
mosquito-free zone and allow them to use more of their property. She said that the reasons for the proposed Variarion
are for the convenience of the petitioner and that the structure would not be likely to have a negative effect on the
character of the neighborhood or the public welfare.
Ms. Connolly pointed out that, although the proposed variiarion may not have a detrimental effect on neighborhood
character, the submittal does not support a finding of hardship, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. She said that
based on these findings, Stuff recommends that the ZBA recommend denial of the proposed Variation to permit an
enclosed structure to encroach into the required 25-foot rear side yard setback for the residence at 2105 Prendergast
Lane, Case No. ZBA-02-01.
Ms. Jumcek asked if Zoning Board members had any questions of staff. As there were none, Ms. Juracek asked if the
petitioner was present and if he wanted to discuss the proposed project.
Frank Panzarino, 2105 Prendergast, was sworn in and testified that he was requesting a VariariOn in order to enclose an
existing patio. He said that his family has lived in the house for fit'ceen years and wants to continue living in Mount
Prospect. He said that the back of his property backs up to the detention area of the St. Cecilia's Church property,
which attracts mosquitoes. He said that his family is unable to sit on the patio because of the mosquitoes and they
would like to enclose the area to build a 3-season room, which they could enjoy in summer.
Leo Floros asked if this wasn't a 4-Season room but Mr. Panzarino responded it was a 3-Season room. Mr. Panzarino
presented photos to the Zoning Board and stated there is always water or moisture in the detention area.
Mr. Floros asked if the room would be heated and air-conditioned. Mr. Panzarino said that it would be heated and
have air condirioning to allow the family to use to room all the rime.
Hal Ettinger asked if Mr. Panzarino's neighbors west of his property had open decks on their homes. Mr. panzarino
said they did and that the Village often sprays the area for mosquitoes.
Anthony Kies, 610 S. St. Cecilia Drive, testified that he had no objections to the proposed project. He said that he has
lived in the neighborhood since June of 1997 and that it is a very good, cross-cultural neighborhood. Mr. Kies stated
that family is important to the area and said that he thinks the Panzarino family should be allowed to enjoy the area
outside of their home, which they cannot because of the mosquito problem. He said that the enclosure would help the
Panzarino family become closer, which is important to the community.
Ms. Juracek thanked Mr. Kies for his eloquent speech on his neighbor's behalf, but said that it is difficult to find a
hardship to allow a Variation because of mosquitoes. She explained that it was the Zoning Board's purview to make a
recommendation to the Village Board, who would make the final determination and
At 8:40, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Zoning Board.
Leo Floros and Merrill Cotton said that they would support the request because they felt the mosquito problem denied
the homeowner the use of his property. Other Zoning Board members pointed out that the request was more like
adding another room to a house that probably already has a family room, recreation room, and dining room. Zoning
Board members discussed how aesthetics contributed to establishing a specific setback and the effect on the properties
if St. Cecilia constructed a fence to enclose their property. Furthermore, they discussed how the addition would put the
site at the maximum amount of permitted lot coverage and limit future property owners from installing a service walk
or shed.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-02-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
There was no further discussion, and Ms. Juracek asked for a roll call on the motion.
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for a Variation to enclose a structure in the
rear yard setback. R/chard Rogers seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cottan, Floras
NAYS: Ettniger, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
Motion was denied 4-2.
At 9:48 p.m., after two more cases were heard, R/chard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith
Youngqnist. The motion was approved by a voic~ vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Judy Cormolly, AICP, Senior Planner
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-03-2001 Hearing Date: January 25,2001
PETITIONER: Ardaur & Deniee Kraeger
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 609 Eastman
PUBLICATION DATE: January 10, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Variation to construct an unenclosed 5' x 56' unenclosed porch in the exterior
side yard setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Hal Ettmger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Arthur & Denice Krueger
Chris George
Tim Nemmer
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the November 9, 2000 meeting were
approved. The Zoning Board heard two cases and at 8:50, Chairperson Juracek introduced Case ZBA-03-2001, a
variation to construct an unenclosed porch in the exterior side yard setback. The Zoning Board's decision is final for
this case.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given, and introduced the staff memorandum for the
item, a variation to construct an unenclosed pomh in the exterior side yard setback. She described the subject property
as an existing home located on a comer lot on a single-family residential street, which dead-ends into an adjacent
industrial park. The home is currently set back almost 35' from the front lot line on Eastman Drive and 20' from the
exterior lot line on Holly Ave. The applicant would like to construct a 5'x56' unenclosed porch in the exterior side
yard along Holly Ave, which is used as the front of the house. The porch would encroach 5' into the required 20'
setback and requires a variation. The home currently meets the required setback and does not encroach into this yard.
Ms. Cennolly explained that the petitioners are adding a second story addition and that the porch will create a unified
look to the residence. The proposed unenclosed porch is similar to other porches that received a Conditional Use
permit and that the petitioners feel that the proposed porch will enhance the home by adding a unifying, desirable
feature to the structure. However, the proposed structure would come to within 15' of the property line as opposed to
25' for front yard porches. The applicant is seeking a variation because the structure will be located in the side yard
setback and the Conditional Use is applicable to porches in the front yard setback.
Ms. Connolly stated that, in order to conduct its analysis of the proposed variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat
of survey and site plan and visited the site. She described the subject parcel as a 12,675 square foot parcel that is
relatively level, out of any flood zone and rectangular. The parcel is developed with a single family home and attached
garage.
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-03 -2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Ms. Connolly explained that the reasons for the proposed variation are aesthetic, rather than financial. The applicant
proposes the encroachment to unify the second-stow addition with the existing structure. She said that the porch could
enhance the character of the existing single-family residential area and would not have a negative effect on the public
welfare. However, no particular condition of the lot justifies the proposed encroachment and there isn't sufficient
justification for a Variation by the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
Ms. Connolly stated that, although the proposed variation could have a positive effect on neighborhood character, the
submittal does not support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards of the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA deny the proposed Variation to permit a 5' x 56' unenclosed
porch to encroach 5' into the required 20' exterior side yard setback for the residence at 609 Eastman Drive, Case No.
ZBA-03-01.
Ms. Suracek asked if Zoning Board members had any questions for staff. Leo Floros asked if this property was
adjacent to the Kensington Center and Ms. Counolly said it was directly east. Hal Ettinger asked if this property had a
Holly Avenue address, how would this impact the request. Ms. Connolly responded that the Zoning Ordinance defines
the front of a property as having the narrowest frontage and that a Holly Avenue address would not change the
petitioner's need to obtain a variation to constmct the porch along Holly Avenue. Ms. Juracek asked about lot
coverage and was told that 45% coverage is allowed and that the coverage would be at 32%, including the proposed
addition. Ms. Juracek noted that the house is set back 5' more than the setback required on Eastman. Mr. Youngquist
asked if sizes of certain lots had increased when the Village vacated a portion of Wheeling Road in the late '80s. Ms.
Counolly said that the subject property was increased as a result of the Village vacating a right-of-way when the
industrial park was built.
Ms. Juracek asked the petitioner to present the project. Art Krueger, 609 Eastman, was sworn in. Mr. Krueger said
that he felt his neighborhood needed a change and that by redesigning his home he hopes to encourage other neighbors
to reinvest in their property. He stated that he wanted to add a second floor onto the existing structure and that an
unenclosed porch, that was basically a 5' covered walkway leading to an existing 7' sidewalk connecting to the city
sidewalk, gives the addition a unified appearance. He said that he and his wife are expecting their first child and want
to stay in Mount Prospect. He noted that the house is located on a dead-end street and has very little traffic. Mr.
Krueger said that the addition and porch would improve the appearance of the dead-end street since the Village
removed several large pine trees. He added that the telephone lines prohibited them from adding onto the back of their
home (east) because there is a utility easement.
Richard Rogers asked Mr. Krueger if he understood that should the Zoning Board approve the requested variation for a
porch that the porch has to remain unenclosed. Mr. K~ueger said yes, and that he had no plans to enclose the porch.
Tom Nemmer, 607 N. Eastman, was sworn in. He testified that the Kmeger family has lived in the home for five years
and that he supports the proposed porch based on how well Mr. Krueger has already improved the property. Mr.
Nemmer agreed that the neighborhood has a lot of potential for remodeling and expanding houses and said that he is in
favor of attempts to beautify the area. He said that he thought his neighbor's second story was a necessary addition,
especially since the home does not have a basement. Mr. Nemmer agreed that the porch helps to "tie-in" the addition
to the home.
At 9:10, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for discussion from the Board. Keith Youngquist
told Mr. Krneger that his immediate neighbors will not be able to build homes this large, due to new FAR requirements
to be enacted tonight.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-03-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the request for a Variation to construct an unenclosed porch in the exterior
side yard setback. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Suracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 7-0.
At 9:25 p.m., after another case was heard, Richard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist.
The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-04-2001 Hearing Date: Januaxy 25,2001
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S~ Emerson St.
PUBLICATION DATE: January 10, 2001 Journal/Topics
REQUEST: Text Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance:
1) to create a minor variation process and amend the zoning ordinance
accordingly to implement the process;
2) to create a floor-area-ratio (FAR) requirement for single family dwellings
and amend the zoning ordinance accordingly to implement an FAR;
3) to increase the maximum size ora detached garage to 672 square feet and
eliminate conditional use approval for garages designed for more than
two-motor vehicles;
4) to clarify that the maximum number of accessory structures is two per
zoning lot and exempt swimming pools from this provision;
5) to require that the finished side ora fence is exposed along arterial streets;
6) to eliminate parking lots from the bulk regulations sections of the
nonresidential zoning districts to permit parking lots within 10-feet of a
property line, unless adjacent to single family residential zoning districts.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Hal Ettinger
Leo Floros
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Counolly, AICP, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the November 9, 2000 meeting were
approved. The Zoning Board heard Case Nos. ZBA-01-01, ZBA-02-01, and ZBA-03-01. At 9:16, Ms. Juracek
introduced Case No. ZBA-04-01, Text Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance.
Judy Cormolly, Senior Planner, stated that public notice had been given and introduced the staff memorandum for the
item, a request for Text Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. As background to the case, Ms. Counolly explained
that the Village Board and Zoning Board members discussed several zoning issues at a previous Committee of the
Whole meeting last fall. Copies of the minutes from the September COW Meehng and the Staff memo, which were
the basis of that discussion, were included in the recent ZBA packets. As a result of these discussions, Staff was
directed to draf~ text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Counolly said that the amendments (1) create a Minor
Variation process, (2) create residential Floor Area Ratio (FAR) requirements, and (3) increase the size of detached
garages to 672 s.f. and eliminate the Conditional Use requirement for garages designed for more than two vehicles.
She explained that, in addition to these amendments, staff drafted three other text amendments in response to concerns
expressed at later Village Board meetings and to clarify Village policy. These amendments (1) require that the
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-04-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
finished side of a fence faces out along arterial streets, (2) limit the number of accessory structures and (3) clarify
parking setbacks for nonresidential properties that are adjacent to nonresidential zoning districts.
It was decided that Ms. Connolly would briefly describe each amendment and Zoning Board members would voice
their comments and questions at the completion of each amendment.
MINOR VARIATION PROCESS
Ms. Connolly described the minor variation process as one that would allow the Director of Community Development
to hold an administrative hearing and decide whether an existing non-conforming structure, such as a patio or shed
could be replaced in kind. Currently, the Zoning Ordinance allows people to replace certain non-conforming
structures, but requires that they meet lot coverage requirements. Ms. Cormolly stated that if the minor variation
process is approved as proposed, a resident could replace an existing patio that was 3' from the lot line, when code
required a 5' setback through a simpler hearing process. She said another example replacing an existing patio, same
size and location, even ifthe lot coverage exceeded the maximum allowed by code. She said that if code allowed up to
50% lot coverage, the resident could have the same lot coverage up to 55%. Ms. Connolly reported that the Staff
memo contains revised sections of the Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to the minor variation process. Ms. Cormolly
said that the Director of Community Development could only hear requests for petitions for replacing existing non-
conforming structures that: (1) extend into no more than 40% of the required interior setback, (2) extend into no more
than 10% of the rear yard setback or (3) where the applicable lot coverage does not exceed the m,~ximum permitted for
that zoning district by more than 10%: She said that the new section creates standards for minor variations that require
that the Director of Community Development to make findings of fact based the standards listed in the staff memo and
input from adjacent property owners. The new section creates notice requirements to ensure that neighbors are aware
of the request and includes posting a sign in front of the property, having neighbors sign an administrative notice or
having the applicant mail the administrative notice through Certified Mail. Ms. Connolly described the administrative
notice as having the property address, a description of the project, and where and when the heating will be held. She
said residents can go to the hearing or submit their comments in writing. In addition, the new section creates an
appeals process whereby residents can appeal the Director's decision on minor variations to the ZBA.
Ms. Jumcek asked if there would be a trial period for the Minor Variation Process. Michael Blue said that if the
process was not working that Minor Variations could be removed from the Zoning Ordinance as a text amendment.
Ms. Juracek asked who presently provides notice to the adjacent property owners. Ms. Counolly responded that the
petitioner obtains the names of property owners within 250' and prepares labels, which are given to staff. The notices
are mailed to the homeowners by staff. Mr. Blue pointed out that under the new system the petitioner would
personally contact homeowners within 50' of the petitioner's property for their approval and signs would continue to
be posted. Ms. Juracek said that was a much more friendly process.
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR)
Ms. Counolly explained that Floor Area Ratios (FAR) are regulations that limit the intensity of development. She said
that the Village currently uses lot coverage to regulate the amount of property a development covers, but recent
development trends require that the code be revised to include an FAR in an effort to restrict the gross square footage
of buildings that may be constructed on a property. She stated that current lot coverage requirements would not
change as those regulations also govern structures such as patios and decks. The Zoning Ordinance would be revised to
create FAR regulations and a definition of FAR. Ms. Connolly said that Staff had researched adjacent communities'
requirements to arrive at the proposed FAlls and definition.
Ms. Jumcek asked why RX districts had a .35 FAR and other districts had a .5 FAR. Ms. Cormolly explained that R-X
district was the largest lot size and that a .5 FAR on a large lot would allow for too large a structure.
DETACHED GARAGES
Ms. Connolly reported that in response to lifestyle changes, the number of requests for detached garages larger than
600 s.f. has increased. People are driving larger vehicles and using garages as a workspace or storage area. Village
Board directed staffto revise the Zoning Ordinance to increase the size of detached garages to 672 square feet. This
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-04-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
number was arrived at based on how garages are designed and constructed (28'x24' is a standard 3-ear garage size),
and how people use garages, in relation to the aesthetics of the community. Ms. Connolly said that this text
amendment seeks to eliminate the requirement that garages designed to house moro than two vehicles receive
Conditional Use approval. By increasing the size of detached garages to 672 square feet, the garage is designed for
more than two vehicles and puts an undue burden on homeowners who wish to construct a garage as would be allowed
by the proposed text amendment. Ms. Connolly described the proposed changes to sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
Richard Rogers asked if the Director of Community Development would be authorized to allow someone to construct
a new garage 10% larger than the newly allowable 672 s.f. Ms. Connolly said no, that the minor variation would apply
to existing buildings only. Mr. Blue said the minor variation process would be for setback requirements and not to
allow an increase to a garage size. The resident would have to apply to the ZBA for a garage larger than 672 s.f.
MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Ms. Connolly explained that it has been Village policy to allow two accessory structures per property, but that the
Zoning Ordinance does not specifically state such limit. She said that current code regulations address the location of
accessory structures and the amount of lot coverage permitted, as a whole for the property. Revising the Zoning
Ordinance to specifically state that accessory structures are limited to two per lot, and exempting swimming pools
from this total, would maintain the aesthetics of the community and limit the number of accessory structures. This
would allow homeowners to have a swimming pool, a shed, and a detached garage, or a swimming pool, gazebo, and a
detached garage. Ms. Connolly described the proposed changes to sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
Arlene Juracek asked if someone would have to go through the variation process if they requested more than two
structures. Ms. Connolly said that they would have to get approval from the ZBA.
FENCES
Ms. Connolly reported that, in an effort to improve the appearance of the town's corridors, Village Board has directed
Staffto prepare a text amendment that requires homeowners to install the fmished side of a fence face "out", towards
the street, along arterial roads. The code currently requires that the "good" side face out, towards your neighbor, but
allows the unfinished side to be exposed along arterial roads. The code would be amended so that the last sentence of
14.304D.2.a is deleted:
PARKING LOTS
Ms. Connolly stated that the Bulk Regulations section of the Zoning Ordinance requires parking lots to meet the same
setbacks as a building. In the Off-Street Parking and Loading section of the Zoning Ordinance, parking lots in a
nonresidential zoning district are allowed within ten-feet of the property line unless the parking lot is adjacent to single
family residential. She pointed out that the code regulations are contradictory. Eliminating "parking lots" from Bulk
Regulation sections of Business, Industrial, and Office Research Zoning Districts clarifies code requirements. The
Staff memo lists specific sections of the Zoning Ordinance that would be revised.
Hal Ettinger asked why parking lots would have less restrictive requirements than buildings as they still have an
impact. Ms. Connolly responded that when the parking lot is adjacent to single-family residential it must adopt the
more stringent setback so it would be further away, similar to the building. Mr. Ettinger suggested the Ordinance
should be more restrictive regarding parking lots. Mr. Blue said that the Village did have a more restricted code but it
was changed six years ago because it restricted development of the commercial corridor. The amendment several
years ago allowed properties not adjacent to residential to have parking 10' from the lot line. Mr. Ettinger disagreed
with this decision. He said that this change allows more commercial development and encourages parking lots. He
said that along commercial corridors are part of a community, but that it was bad for a community to acquiesce to
vehicles. Mr. Blue agreed, but said that the Ordinance as originally written was overly restricting to development. Ms.
Juracek said the Village did make changes in the Off-Street and Loading sections, but not the Bulk Regulations
sections. This amendment affirms that determination that a parking lot has a different impact than bulk regulations
intended to govern.
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-04-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 4
Ms. Connolly summarized the amendments saying that the proposed text amendments are a result of (1) in-depth
discussions with the Village Board and the Zoning Board on what changes are necessary for the Zoning Ordinance to
accurately reflect Village policy and goals, (2) research of neighboring communities regulations and what is consistent
with community expectations, and (3) clarifying existing code regulations. The proposed amendments meet the
standards listed in Sec. 14.203.D.8.b which relate to the degree to which the amendments are consistent with Village
policy, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, applicable to the Village at large and not for the benefit a specific
property, and also consistent with objectives and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, Staff recommends that
the ZBA recommend approval of the proposed text amendments as listed in the staff'memo.
At 9:45, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing and asked for motions on each amendment individually.
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for Text Amendments to Zoning Ordinance
Nos. 14.203 and 14.2401, to create a Minor Variation Process and related changes and provisions to various sections of
the Zoning Ordinance. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Etfinger, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0.
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for Text Amendments to Zoning Ordinance
Nos. 14.306.B. 1, ar.803.A, 14.902.A, and 14.1003.A, to increase the maximum size of detached garages to 672 s.f. and
eliminate Conditional Use approval requirements for garages designed to house more than two motor vehicles. Keith
Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Yotmgquist, and Juracek
NAYS: Rogers
Motion was approved 5-1.
Keith Youngquist made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for Text Amendments to Zoning
Ordinance Nos. 14.306.A.5, to limit the number of accessory structures to two structures. Merrill Cotten seconded the
motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotterg Ettinger, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0.
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for Text Amendments to Zoning
Ordinance Nos. 14.805, 14.905, 14.1005, 14.1105, 14.1205, 14.1304, 14.2401, to create Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
requirements and related definitions. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Suracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-04-2001
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 5
Merrill Cotten made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for Text Amendments to Zoning Ordinance
No. 14.2217, to clarify setback requirements for parking lots. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Youngquist, and Juracek
NAYS: Ettinger, Rogers
Motion was approved 4-2.
Merrill Cotten made a motion to recommend to the Village Board approval for Text Amendments to Zoning Ordinance
No. 14.304.D:2.b, to eliminate provisions that allow the unfinished side ora fence to be exposed along arterial streets.
Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Ettinger, Floros, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0.
At 9:48 p.m., Richard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Hal Ettinger. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Judy Counolly, Senior Planner