HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 08/01/2000Next Ordinance No. 5129
Next Resolution No. 28-00
A SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING WILL CONVENE
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE REGULAR VILLAGE BOARD MEETING
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South Emerson Street August 1, 2000
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer TruStee Irvana Wilks
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Lohrstorfer
IV. INVOCATION: Mayor Farley
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 18, 2000
VI. *APPROVE BILLS
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. 1~ reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC
LIQUORS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit A)
This ordinance grants a Class mC" liquor license (retail package sales only) to
Dominick's Finer Foods, '1145 Mount Prospect Plaza.
B. *Appointments
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT '100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064.
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IX. OLD BUSINESS
A. lS' reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 802 SOUTH WILLIAM STREET (Exhibit B)
This ordinance grants a variation to allow the construction of a new garage, using
the existing garage pad/floor, which currently encroaches into the side yard. The
Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval of the request by a vote
of 4-0.
B. 1s~ reading ofANORD NANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5039 FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
2400 TERMINAL DRIVE (Exhibit C
This ordinance amends Ordinance No. 5039, which granted a Conditional Use
permit, to allow the const~ction of a truck maintenance facility. The Zoning Board
of Appeals has recommended appreval of the request by a vote of 4-0.
C. 1~' reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1104 SOUTH CHURCH ROAD (Exhibit D
This ordinance grants a variation to allow a pool and deck addition to
encroach eight feet (8') into the rear yard setback and ten feet (10') into the
exterior side setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval
of the reques[ by a vote of 4-0.
D. 1s, reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 [ZONING) OF THE
VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit E
This ordinance amends Sections VII, VIII, and XIX of the Zoning Code by adding
"outdoor dining areas" as permitted uses in the B:3, B-4, and Bo5 zoning districts,
establishing minimum standards for the operation of outdoor dining areas, and
establishing a licensing process for Village review of them. The Zoning Board of
Appeals has recommended approval by a' vote of 4-0.
E. 1s~ reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE
VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit F)
This ordinance amends the Zoning Code by establish minimum standards for
artificial lighting in parking lots. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended
approval by a vote of 4-0.
X. CONSENT AGENDA
Items designated by an asterisk (*) will be considered at this time.
XI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
Xll. NEW BUSINESS
A. '1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 (APPOINTIVE
VILLAGE OFFICERS) OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit G)
This ordinance amends Chapter 4. Article IX, of the Village Code relative to
the number of Captain-Shift Commanders in the Fire Department.
B. '1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN
PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit H)
This ordinance authorizes the Television Services Division to offer ~urplus
equipment for sale or donation.
C. 1s' reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II ENTITLED "RULES
OF ORDER" OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit I)
This ordinance amends the order of business of Village Board meetings by
placing the Consent Agenda towards the beginning of meetings, rather than
towards the end, as was approved at the July 18, 2000 meeting.
XIII. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Status Report
XIV. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XV. ADJOURNMENT
SPECIAL MEETING
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday, August 1, 2000
50 South Emerson Street Following Regular Board Meeting
I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald L. Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Pdkkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks
II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF JULY 25, 2000
Ill. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IV. VILLAGE HALL/SENIOR CENTER DISCUSSION
The Special Committee of the Whole meeting for this evening is the second of three
scheduled meetings to discuss the future of the Village Hall and Senior Center. The
meetings ara scheduled over several weeks in an effort to afford ample opportunity to the
Village Board to gather community input regarding an appropriate course of action. The
final meeting on August 8 is a Committee of the Whole that will include not only the Village
Hall discussion, but also the six-month budget review and 2001 Budget preview.
Background materials were previously distributed to Board members and will again be
available to residents attending the meeting.
The Village Hall Ad Hoc Committee has previously provided a report to the Village Board
and a summary of the Committee's recommendations are included for informational
purposes. One of the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Committee was the proposed
solution for parking at a new'Village Hall site. Much of the discussion focused on the use
of underground parking and maximizing green space. Previous Village staff reports
projected the possibility of'a parking structure to be incorporated with a new Village Hall and
existing public library parking. Additional background information is provided regarding
possible parking options for the proposed site.
NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF
A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD
CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT '~00 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064.
The proposed sedes of meetings is intended to discuss the Ad Hoc recommendations and
any other points the Village Board feels are important so that any decisions made can be
costed out and included in the 2001 budget, as necessary. If a decision is made to move
forward design options and space study decisions will need attention in the latter part of
August and into September.
A notice of this meeting and the proposed meetings on August 1 and 8 has been posted
at the Senior Center. Letters inviting any interested member of the Village Hall Ad Hoc
committee has also been sent out regarding the proposed meetings. Appropriate Village
staff members will be present to facilitate the discussion.
V. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
CLOSED SESSION
PERSONNEL
5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (1). "The appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or
dismissal of specific employees of the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint
lodged against an employee to determine its validity."
5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (2). "Collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees
or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of
employees."
PROPERTY ACQUISITION
5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (5). "The purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body."
H:~GEN~Cow~Agenda~801500 SPECIAL COW Agenda.doc
JULY 18, 2000
CALL
TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
ROLL CALL Present upon roll cell: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trus~tee Pawl Hoefe~t
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvane Wilks
Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Dennis;Prikkel
PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Trustee Hoefert led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION INVOCATION
Trustee Wilks gave the invocetion.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MINUTES Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held June 20, 2000.
Upon roll cell: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Farley
Na~/s:~' None
Present: Wilks
Motion carried.
BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve payment of the
foliowin~ bills, dated June29, 2000:
General Fund $ 384,974
RefUse-Disposal Fund
Motbr Fuel Tax Fund 8,936
Lo(~al Law: Enforcement BIk Gi~ant ~Fund 1997
Community DEvelopment BlbCk' Grant Fund 13,497
Debt Service: FUnds. ' · 22,769
Capital Improvement Fund ' 35,614
Capital Improvement Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Const. Fund 38 721
Street Improvement Construction Fund 138,510
Flood Control Construction Fund 18,023
'Water & Sewer Fund 28,330
Parking System Revenue Fund 7,412
vehicle M~intenance Fbnd 13,942
Vehicle ReplaCement Fund 16,261
Computer. Replacement FUnd
Risk Management~Fund 11,232
PoliCe Pension Fund 28,054
Fire Pension Fund. 25,078
Flexcomp Trust~Fund 2,801
Escrow Deposit Fund 2~ .486
Benefit Trust Funds 544
$ 816,184
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays:~ ' None,
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve payment of the
following bills;,dated July '~3, 2000:' ~- ~ -.
General Fund - $ 431,020
Refuse Disposal F~und. 283,410
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 7.108
Local Law Enforcement BIk Grant Fund 1997
Community Development BloCk Gr~nt Fund 547
Debt Service Funds, , 795,444
Capital improvement Fund 1,386
Capital Improvement Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Cpq~..Fupd 198,146
Street Improvement Co~stru¢fipp Fund
Flood Control Construction~ ~UB~ 12,261
Water & Sewer Fund 343,486
Parking System Revenue,~eund.
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 13,221
Vehicle Replacement Fund 8,959
Computer Replacement Fund. ~ 1,401
Risk Management Fund 122,848
Police Pension Fund 63
Fire Pension Fund 350
Flexcomp Trust Fund 2,852
Escrow Deposit Fund 36,572
Benefit Trust Funds
$2,259,071
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, LohrStorfer. Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FINANCIAL FINANCIAL REPORT
REPORT Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of the financia
report dated January 1 - June 30, 2000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MAYOR'S MAYOR'S REPORT
REPORT Mayor Farley presented the seventh annual Workforce Development Council Scholarship
Awards to Christen Sto[tman and Neel PateL These scholarships, funded in part by Mid-
WORKFORCE City Bank, AT&T, and ARC Dispo, sal & Recycling,are for $1000 each to assist students
DEV. COUNCIL with college expenses. Ms. Stol.tman Will attend Harper College~ majoring in Education,
and Mr. Patel will attend the ur~iversity of Champaign at Urbana, and plans to major in
SCHOLARSHIP Computer Engineering and Business Management.
AWARDS
Paula Randant President of tl~e ~iWan s Club of Mount Prospect presented two checks,
LOWELL J. FELL . each for $1000, as part of the iAte. FirefJghte~: Lowell J. 'Fell Memorial Scholarship fund.
SCHOLARSHIPS The recipients were Barbara Y~dbii,'who plans to attend the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign, and Leah Petersen, who will attend DePaul University.
FIRE DEPT,
AWARD Additionally, she presented, on behalf of the Kiwanis Club, a $1000 check to Rich
Doubek, Public Education Officer for the the Mount Prospect Fire Department for the fire
POLICE DEPT. safety house, and a $500 check to Crime Prevention Officer Bi I Roscop for the Mount
AWARD Prospect Police Department chiid Safety seat Program.,
Mayor Fadey noted the recent deaths of Frank Boege, Plan Commissioner, and Parker
Ekron, who served as a Village trustee from 1959-1967.
Page, 2 - July 18, 2000
n whistle
- blowing that was recently ordered by the transportation officials as the result of a recent
fatal accident at Route 83.
Mayor Farley assured him that staffis taking st~ps toward~ resolving the matter.
PC 05-2000 OLD BUSINESS
2 E. RAND RD. PC 05.2000, 2 East Rand Road
An ordinance ~vas presented, for first reading which would grant an exception from the
Development Code t0 Waive the requirement for On-site stormwater detention at 2 E.
Rand Road (Shell Oil CO.).
Trustee Hoefed. seconded by'Trustee Lohrstorfar; mOVed'to Waive the rule requiring two
readings Of'an ordinance.
Upon roll cai :' Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: No.ne:
Motion carried,
Trustee~EI0efert, seconded by Trustee Lohrst0rfer, moved for approval of Ordinance
ORD. No: 51~23:
NO. 5123 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION FROM CHAPTER 16 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2 EAST RAND ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays:None
Motion carried,
AMEND An ordinance was presented for second reading which would amend Chapter 2 of the
Village Code by, adopti.ngthe Consent Agenda as a pa~ of the order of business. The
CH. 2: ordinance also eliminates the concurrence vote currently required by the Village Board
ADOPT for cases referred to them with positive recommendations by the Plan commission and
CONSENT Zoning Board of ApPeals.
AGEN DA &
DROP Trustee Wilks noted the proposed ordinance had been revised since the first reading:and
CONCUR- suggested the t:tle of .:he proposed ordinance be rewsed to include the words "Rules of
RENCE VOTE Order" to.better reflect the sctual content of the,0rdinance;
Village Manager Michael Janonis stated that staff would make that revision,
~..r,,ustee Wilks also asked that, when the Board begins using the C0nsent Agenda, the
Village Clerk keep a record of all items that are removed from the Consent Agenda, and
by whom, at each meeting. She stated that such information might be useful when the
Consent Agenda procedure is evaluated in six months,.
Trustee Will(s; secanded by Trustee gohrstorfer 'moved for approval of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5124:
NO. 5124
OF APPEALS
Upon roil'call: Ayes: Hoe~fert, LohrStorfer Skowron, Wilks
N~ys: Non~ ~ ~
Motion carried,.
Page 3- July 18, 2000
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 20-2000 ZBA 20-200(~; 802 S. William Str:eet~
802 S. A request'was presented for':a variation to allow the construction of a new garage, using
WILLtAM ST.' · the existing garage pad or floor Which current y encroaches nto the five-foot (5') side
yard setback of the subject property. The Zoning, I~oard ofAppea S (ZBA) had
recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohretorfer, moved to concLir with the
recommendation of the ZBA to approve this request. .
Upon roll_call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks~
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the August 1 Village Board meeting.
ZBA 21-2000
2400 ZBA 21-2000, 2400 Terminal Drive, Road Runner Cartage:
TERMINAL A request,was presented for an amendment to a Conditional Use permit, previously
approved as Ordinance No. 5039 on August 17; 1999, to allow the construction of a 4800
DRIVE sq. ft. truck maintenance facility. The ZBA had recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.
Director of Community Development William Cooney, recommended specific conditions
for inclusion in a proposed ordinance, including that all prior conditions set forth in
Ordinance No. 5039 relative to hours of operation and landscaping still apply.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to concur with the
recommendation of the ZBA to approve the petitioner's request with conditions as stated.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None .
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the August 1 Village Board meeting.
ZBA 16-2000 ZBA 16-2000, 1104 S. Chumh Road
1104 S. A request was presented for a variation to allow a pool and deck addition to encroach
CHURCH eight feet (8') into the rear yard setback, and ten feet (10') into the exterior side setback..
ROAD The ZBA had recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrsterfer, moved to concur with the
recommendation of the ZBA to approve the petitioner's request.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
N~ys: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at. the:August 1' Village Board meeting.
ZBA 08-2000
TEXT ZBA 08-2000; Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
AMENDMENT, ZBA 8-00, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
OUTDOOR A request was presented for amendments to the Village Code for the following:
To permit outdoor dining areas in the B~3,.B;-4, and B-5:zon ng d stricts;
DINING AREAS to establish minimum standards for the operation of.outdoor dining areas;
'and teestablish a licensing process for:Village staff's review of outdoor dining areas.
The ZBA had recommended approval of all amendments by a.vote of 4-0.
Trustee Wilks asked Mr. Cooney when the liquor code, Chapter 13 of the Village Code,
will be revised to coordinatewith these prop, osed amendments; he stated that there are
no plans to revise that portion of the Co~le. ! He further explained that all liquor is to be
consumed only inside restaurants if the restaurant is located within 300' of residential
Page 4- July 18, 2000
property. Trustee Wilks e~r~ ~17~ that t~e consumpbon of alcohol at
0utdoo~: establishments mi~t~t lead to noise and could ~ery' easily create uncomfortable
situations for people residing within districts where outdoor dining would be allowed.
Res dent Mary Johnson, 2.15 S. Emerson Street, addressed the Board with concerns
'relative to the allowable s~ze 0fthe outdoor dining areas,: as. welles the hours of
operation allowed. She was also very concerned about the parking Spaces allowed for
restaurants with outdoor dining, and whether there might be an increase in parked cars,
resulting in major inconveniences to residents living nearby.
Mr. Cooney addressed Mrs. Johnson's concerns and reiterated that any restaurant that
m ght be licensed for outdoor dining would be reviewed a~nually, and that their license
could be revoked at any time that problems occurred as a result of the outdoor dining.
TrUstees Skowron and Hoef~t,expmssed.their support for the.proposed amendments~
Trustee Skowron, seconded by, Trustee Lohrstorter, moved to concur with the
re~_,ommendafi0n ~f the ZBA to approve the requested text amendments.
Upon rollcall: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wiiks
NayS: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presentedfor first reading atthe August 1 Village Board meeting.
ZBA 13-2000, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
ZBA 13-2000 Arequest was pmsented,fo~r amendments to the V lage Code to establish minimum
TEXT ~tandards for a{'tificial-lighting in Parking lots. The ZBA~had '~ecommended approval by a
AMENDMENT, vote of 4.0.
PARKING LOT
Mr. Cooney provided the Board with an overview of the proposed amendments. He
LIGHTING stated that currently, the Code provides very limited guidelines, among them that parking
at lights should be extinguished ~ro~ 11:00 p.m.-~7;00 a.m~ and that lights should be
d re'ted n such a way as'not to Sp Over onto ~-esidemia properties.
He added that the proposed requirements, which include removal of the requirement that
parking lot lights should be turned Off from 11:00 p~m._ ~:00 a.m., would apply only when
new P~rking lots are built, ex stinglotsa~e expanded, o~ new I!ghting is added to parking
lots.
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the
rec0mme~dation of th'e zBA.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowmn, Wilks
- Nays.: None
Motion carried.
An o~dinancewill be presented for first readingat theAugust 1 Village Board meeting.
AMEND CH, 5' Aa 0rdinance:was presented for first reading, to amend Chapter 5 (Boards and
PLAN C(~ ' C0~nis~i~)ns) bY r~ducing the humbler of members required f°r the Plan C°mmissi°n
~c~/~r3 i~.q~: and the So[id Waste commission from nine to seven for each commission. It also
..~..;'. provides fo~,the disso ut on of the Bus ness District~Development & Redevelopme
LJUIVlIVI, ~ : · ' '
Camm ss on and the S gn Rev ew Board. .
BDDRC,
SIGN REVIEW Trustee Haefert,.secor~ded byTrustee Lohrstorfer, moved towaive the rule requiring two
BOARD readings of an Ordinance.
Page 5 -July 18, 2000
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried'.
ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5125:
NO. 5125
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF: CHAPTER 5 (BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS): oF THE ~/I:Li.'AGE'coDE`
Upon roltcall: Ayes: Hoefert, Lehrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND
CH. 14: An ordinance was presented for first readingto amend Chapter 14 (Zoning), Article V, of
the Village Code, by modifTing the duties of the Zen ng Board of Appeals to establish
MODIFY their jurisdiction 0~er all si~n related ite~ns previously handled by t~t~e sign Review Board.
ZBA DUTIES
'Trustee Hoefert, seconded byTrustee Skowron, moved to wai,/e the rule requiring two
readings of"an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.
NO. 5126 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5126:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14. ARTICLE V, OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowror Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A resolution was presented to amend Resolution Nc. 40-84, Which set established costs
AMEND and procedures for Freedom of nformafion requests. Specifically, certain costs for
RES. 40-84: obtaining information were listed, which have increased over the years and the proposed
Fei resolution reflects the current costs;
PROCEDURES
Trustee Wilks; seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval for Resolution
RES. rio. 27-00:
NO. 27-00
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 40-84 RELATIVE TO THE FREEDOM
OF INFORMATION ACT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ESTABLISH An ordinance was presented for first reading, which authorizes the Village to establish a
TIF REGISTRY registry for interested padies to receive notification of Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
information, which would include,,am0ng other things, TIF amendment actions and
annual reports.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon~ roll Carl: Ayes: Hoefert; Lohrstorfer, Skowfon, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carrie(~
Page 6 - July 18, 2000
ORD..
NO. 5127
-IMENT OFT,AX INCREMENT
FI ;ING"INTERESTEE
Upor~ roll cai!: Wilks
AMEND Motion
REDEVEL. An ordinance was presented for first reading to amend the Village's Redevelopment Plan
PLAN;: and to direct the C~)ok County Clerk to remit the property taxes leVied in the twenty-third
23RD YEAR, TI.F year of the TIFto the Village.
MONIES
Trustee Wilks, seq0nded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requ r ng two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron~ Wilks
Nays: None
Motion-carried.
Trustee Wilks. seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approva of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5128:
NO. 5128
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND PROJECT FOR THE MOUNT PROSPECT TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA NUMBER ONE
Upon roll call:. Ayes: .Hoefert Lohretorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
TIF JOINT A request was presented for a motion to appoint a representative.to the Joint Review
REVIEW ~Boar~l, as required by the TIF Reform Act 0f 1999. The Mayor is the designated elected
BOARD REP. official of the Village t0 serve in this capacity.
'[rustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to appoint Mayor Farley as a
rePresentative to the Joint Review Board.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowror Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ACCEPT Requests were presented for Board acceptance/adoption of the following reports:
VARIOUS 1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended
FINANCIAL December 31, 1999;
REPORTS & 2. tax Increment Financing Compliance AUdit for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999;
C P 1.2/31/99
. - ~3: S ng e!Audit Act Compliance Report. for the fiscal year ended
December 3~1~ ~999;,
4. Auditor's Management Letter for the fiscal year ended December 31 1999;
5. 200~i-2005 capital Improvements~ Plan.
~nrUStee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer moved to accept the Comprehensive
nual Financial Report, fis~l year ended December 31, 1999.
Upon roll'calh Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrsto~er, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7- July 18, 2000
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron moved for Board acceptance of the Tax
Increment Financing Complt~rf~e. AUd :~, fiscal, year enSed December 31, 1999. .
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hgefert, L0hrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Motion. carried'. ' ~ ': ~ .
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for Board acceptance of the
Single Audit Act Compliance ReP6rt', fiscal year erided. December. 31, 1999.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried
Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for Board acceptance of the
Auditor's Management Letterl fiscal year ended December 31. 1999.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for Board adoption of the
2001-2005 Capital Improvements Plan.
Upon roll cai[: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wi[ks
Nays: None
Motion carried
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
STORM The following proposals were received for design engineering services for the
SEWER Wedgewood storm sewer improvements and repairs to the Melas Park and Crumley
IMPROVE- detention basins:
MENTS
& DETENTION COMPANY COST
BASIN Peter F. Olesen & Associates, Inc. $38,300
REPAIRS Earth Tech, Inc. 45,500
Stanley Consultants, Inc. 85,760
PETER F. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to award the contract to Peter F.
Olesen & Associates, Inc. for design engineering services for the above project, for an
OLESEN & amount not to exceed $38,300.
ASSOC., INC.
Upon roil call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CONSTRUC-
TION A request was presented for Board acceptance of a proposal from Earth Tech, .Inc. for
INSPECTION & construction inspection and construction management services for the Weller CreekBank
MANAGEMENT Stabilization Project Reach A2.
FOR WELLER
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, movedto accept the above proposal from
CREEK Earth Tach, Inc. for a cost notto exceed $160,000 plus 7% of the final construction costs.
PROJECT ;, , ,,,~
Upon roll call: Ayes:~. Hoefert, bohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
EARTH TECH, Nays: None
INC, Motion carried.
Village Manager Michael Janonis noted that discussions regarding the construction of a
new Village Hall would take, ptaca at meetin:gs on July 25. August 1,. and August 8, 2000.
Page 8 - July 18, 2000
He also encouraged residents ~i~(J viewers to attend the"Do It Downtown" block party
planned for downtown Mount Prospect July 29. This event is hosted by the Chamber of
Commerce and the Village to promote and support local businesses during the Route 83
roadWay construction period'.
ANY OTHER ANY OTHER BUSINESS '
BUSINESS Trustee gohrStoffer asked for an update on the Wisconsin Central (train) pans for
double-tracking in the n0rtheastem portion of the Village. Mr. Janonis r~sponded that the
work probably wou d beg n n the spr ng Of 200t.
Trustee Skowror~ extended compliments to the Commu_n, ity Development Department for
the r recent y pub ished b. rochure highlighting the Village S businesses and services.
CLOSED
CLOSED SESSION
SESSION Trustee Sl~owron, seconded by Trustee Lohrston'er, moved to convene a Closed Session
to discuss the folloWing:
PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (2) - "Collective negotiating matters be[ween the public
body and ts emp oyees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary
schedules for one or more classes or employees."
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowr0n, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
P, ECONVENE RECONVENE
The Village Board reconvened at 10:26 p.m. No business was conducted in the Open
Session.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to adjourn the July 18, 2000
meeting of the Mount Prospect Vi lage Board, at 10:28 p.m.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Page9 - July 18, 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
27-Jul-00
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 07/14/00 to Per Attached Credits/ Balance
07/14/00 07~27~00 List of Bills Debits 07~27~00
General Fund 7,167,218 209,704 562,604 8,814,318
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,322,286 36,555 164,674 1,194,167
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 1,485,767 45,494 1,440,273
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 1,796 1,796
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 29,829 104 63,237 (33,304)
Debt Service Funds 2,960,669 (0) 2,960,669
.Capital Projects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 2,558,695 130,000 6,296 2,682,399
Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 54,225 54,225
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 180,871 180,871
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund (1,674) 22,272 (23,946)
Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,306,113 36,042 173,111 4,169,044
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,719 4,719
Flood Control Construction Fund 3,031,180 (0) 77,897 2,953,283
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fu nd 2,887,797 180,196 54,582 3,013,412
Parking System Revenue Fund 707,986 6,561 2,039 712,507
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 191,886 (0) 18,292 173,593
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,106,345 (0) 416 5,105,928
Computer Replacement Fund 267,042 0 267,043
Risk Management Fund 3,172,377 32,187 32,908 3,171,656
Trust & Aqenc¥ Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,317,755 15,124 34,477 31,298,402
Fire Pension Fund 32,338,111 12,050 33,467 32,316,693
Flexcomp Trust Fund 10,117 9,177 14,041 5,253
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,500,260 26,274 54,015 1,472,519
Benefit Trust Funds 95,459 (0) 544 94,915
100,696,830 693,972 1,360,366 100,030,436
~PORT: APBOAEDRPT GRNEk%TED: 5 NOV 99 !5:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 I2:47 PAGE 1
R~LEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LiST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM J~LY 14 2000 TO J~LY 27 2000
DER VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~0UNT
02919 303 CAB ASS~IATION, INC. SENIOR T~XI RIDES 294.80
02557 ~M, INC. TONER FOR XEROX 178.98
DR~ FOR XEROX 130.00
308.98
01071 ADDISO~ BUILDING ~TERIAL CO. MISC.HARDWA~ & BUILDING 21.21
MISC.HADWA~ & BUILDING 119.56
MISC.~WA~ & BUILDING 10.69
MISC.~DW~ & BUILDING 204.2!
355.67
011~9 AERI~ EQUIPME~, INC. T~IST L~K 0.7!
RENTAL 2100.00
2100.71
05128 AIIM INTE~ATIONAL M~MBE~HIP I25.00
01246 AIRG~ NORTH CEE~L ' CYLINDER ~NTAL 75.75
OXYGEN ~DIC~ USP 198.90
274.65
01423 ~LIED ASP~T PAVING C~P~Y I~942619/43043/43377/43871 1790.30
01606 ~RIC~ INSTIT~E OF CPA'S ~ DUES-ELLSWORTH 125.00
01699 ~RIC~ PUBLIC WO~ ~S~. ~PLO~ D~RTISING 1100.00
01780 ~RITECH PHONE 'SEUICE 57.45
00367 ~DE~ON, ~D M. ~I~ ~PENSES 172.89
01994 ~ ~S~ SEUiCES COF~E 88.30
02138 ~OR SYST~S CO,OPTION COLLE~ION ~ES 58.33
02261 ~S~IATED A~CTIONS E~.INC 4TH OF ~LY P~DE 575.00
02405 B & ~ PH~O/VIDEO VIDEO MONITOR 963.65
AUDI~TEC~ICA 762.40
COLOR MONITOR 974.35
2700.40
02472 B~IER, I~E APR/~ ~ 30.00
02599 BA~O~ I~S & SUITES H~EL ~SES 269.50
02602 ~Z~, 5E~D W. APR/~ ~I~ 51.~0
02745 BERT~OLD N~ERY T~ES 278.50
~PONT: APBOARREPT GENEkATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JU52700 !2:47 PAGE 2
REREASS lB :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRUN JULY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIPTION ANOUNT
TREES 32.00
TREES 11533.00
TREES 1999.00
13842.50
05060 BI-COUNTY SERVICE CENTER, INt. TRAILER HITCH 69.40
05122 BLACK MAGIC DIVE SHOP REGISTER-SKINDINGSRUDE 275.00
REGULATOR SERV/MEPAIR I30.00
405,00
05141 BOROWSKI, IGMACY RE~JND 144.00
05132 BOUNT!NAS, PATRICIA REIMBURSEMENT 36.90
02938 BOMEAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER HDME/PANTS 805.49
HDME/P~TS 481.71
687.20
05133 BRAUN, THBMAS ~F3ND 36.00
01006 BUKSE CAR MASH, INC. A.~GEMENT-PAVLO~K 51.00
CAR WASH 5.25
56.25
05134 CALDMELL, CATHERINE REIMEURSEig./~T 18.00
01017 CALEA REGISTER-R.PAMEOCK 810.00
01018 CALIGOR MEDICAL SUPP I43.59
01025 CANNING, MATT TANKS OF PROPANE 50.00
05125 CASMELL INTN'L CORP. REPAIR PISTOL RANGE 350.00
01049 CDW GOVEP~.~ENT, INC INVESTIGATIVE 391.05
EVIDENCE EQUIPMENT 94.49
iNV CC53175/CC99340 1212.71
IBM FOBMATTED DISKS 83.00
1781.25
01053 CELL~LAN, O~E - CHICA~O SERVICE ACCTT090848 149.46
01056 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY BAKE GOODS I86.30
01078 CHICAGO-ENNT COLLEGE OF LAW MEGINTER-FI~LAH i50.00
01097 CINTAS CORP FIRE-UNIFOR~ EXP 24.00
FIRE-CL~ SENV 88.00
i12.00
A?BOABDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 89 I5:58 RUN: TNUKSDA~ JUL2700 !2:47 PAiE 3
~ELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF EOU.%~ PN~SPECT
LIST OF ~ILLS P~SE~TE~ TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
~ ~LY 14 2000 TO 13LY 27 2000
VEN~R NBR VEN~R N~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION
...................................................................................................................................
05126 CITY OF DES P~INES LABOR CHGS-STO~ ~TED CL~
01113 C~SSLINE, iNC. ONE POCKET I.D BADGE 36.C3
05135 CLEARY, RY~N RE!MBURS~E~
01118 CLE~ OF THE CiRC~!T COURT ?AYDLL FOK - 072700
PAYROLL FOR - 072700
01148 C~O~TH EDISON ~BOR CHGS-STO~ CL~ UP 16122.50
01153 C~ITY CAB CO. T~I RIDES-I72 453.~0
0108~ CONNOR, jCkN EBkTE PUBLIC WALK
01183 C~K COU~Y ~CODE~ OF DEEDS ~CORDING OD.NO.5!08 65.25
04809 C~K CO~TY SHERIFF'S T~G. ACD~ EGIST~TION 1255.30
00309 COONEY, WiLLi~ J. REiMBURS~
05061 DAT~ASE TECHNOL~iES SEUICES RENDE~D
03938 DAVIDSMEYER BUS S~VICE, INC. BUS SEUICE 2376.50
04743 DE~.OF PD~SSION~ ~TION CPA ~GIST~TION 60.00
05153 DI~IC C~ICATIONS CO~. k~ SUPPORT 3960.00
01267 DICK CA~TON ASS~IATES 4TH OF ~LY P~DE 2975.00
01291 ~R ELUATOR C~B~Y ~I~CE 190.57
01313 DUBAGE TOPSOIL iNC. TOPSOIL 33C.00
01320 DYN~IC G~PHICS ~GAZINE G~PHIC COLLECT. 207.95
81328 5-CUE INDUSTEES, INC. ~PAIE P~TS
01329 EL-DIN~Y, SAID ABU~ ~I~ 2!.00
05127 5~ K JOU~S SUBSCRI~ION 6B.00
01342 ~CY ~DIC~ PRO~S T~IONSBLI~ ~R BITCH 113.16
01350 ~D~VOR PLUS P~-~PLO~ TESTING 179~.00
05154 ES~ CHI~/MILWAU~E ~BAIR ~U~CE 164.25
04522 ~CEL S~RTS~ ~EE TEES 2207.40
01366 ~PEE~ ~CKGEO~D INFO.SERVICE 25.00
01377 ~DE~ ~B~SS CURB MtSC.SHIPPING ~GES 16.71
MISC.SHIPPING C~GES 67.7!
REPORT: APPOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY CJL2700 12:47 PAGE 4
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF PILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JULY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEFT VENDOR NBR VENEER NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION
84.42
00329 FELL, J~DITH P. REIMBURSEMENT 67.90
00331 EIGOLA~, MICHAEL REiMB-~OOR~TS 104.02
MEETiNG/DINNER 43.64
EXPENSES 488.00
635.66
00102 FIRE PENSION ~JND ~AYROLL FOR - 072700 12034.12
01400 FiRE PR~ECT!CN PUBLICATIONS iNSPECTiON 30.00
00335 FOLEY, APRIL E. RE!MB SUPP 69.46
RE!MB 44.37
REiMB 21.99
I35.82
01422 FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC CONT,.CT/ET.LIGHTS I768.90
CONTRACT/ET.LIGHTS 426.70
2195.60
01445 FUJITSU BUSINESS C~. SYSTEMS SONTWAREMAINT.AGREL~ENT 41.48
SOFT~ARE ~INT.AGREEMEMT t45.I7
SOFTWARE MAINT.AGREE~ENT 259.24
SONTWARE MAINT.AGRE~"~ENT 145.17
SOFTWARE MAINT.AGREEMEMT 497.73
SOFTWAR~ MAINT.AGREEMENT 145.17
SOKWARE MAINT.AGREEMEMT 186.65
PONTWAREMAINT.AGRE~NT 337.01
SOFTWARE MAINT.AGREEMENT 98.
SOFTWARE MAINT.AGREL~I
SOFTWARE MAI~T.AGREEMENT 471.8i
SOFTWARE MAINT.AGREEME~ 1825.02
SOFTWARE ~INT.AGREEMENT 933.25
SOFTWARE ~INT.AGRE_~Z~ENT 164.00
SOFTWARE MAINT.AGREL~ENT 1016.00
SOFTWARE MAiNT.AGRE~]~NT 164.00
SOFTWARE MAINT.AGRE~NT 250.00
6778.72
01446 F~LTON CONTRACTING CO. PREVENT MAINT. I912.01
01470 GAT~AS, MICHELLE ARE/J~N REIMB 3.00
01495 GLEN, JOEM A~D~ARGE APR/J'u/~ REIMB 15.00
01502 GLOBA~ FIRE EQNTEMENT, INC. A/~ER TU~.N LEMS 906.09
01511 EOODYEARSERVICE STORES INSTALL NEW TIRE 106.05
01548 ~AIGES MACNI~RY PARTS FOR WASMING ~CNINE 959.80
.=£PORT: APBOA,RDE?T GENE~TED: 5 NOV 89 15:58 RUN:THURSDAY JUL2700 12:47 PAGE 5
~LEASE ID :
VILLAGE DF MO~T
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE HOARD OF TAUSTEES
~ ~LY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NB~ VENDOR N~E iN~'OICE DESCRIPTION ~OUNT
LABOR CD2GES 356.00
1315.80
01555 H~EY ~D SONS, B. INC. TEE ~OV~ 731.85
!N~-19012/19124/19125/I9290 55968.75
56700.60
01558 H~S~ ~S~IATES MCNTHLY SEUiCE AG~NT 391.25
MONTHLY SEUICE AG~ 227.15
FD~HLY SEUICE AG~ 100.00
718.40
01576 HEALER LL~ER CO. i5~; 1-2~'3720/1'247240 83.4!
01578 HENDRIC~EN, ROBERT W. STO~ D~33~E CL~ UP 26025.00
04580 HODGE, BOB SEUICES 706.60
01605 HOEG, DONALD APU~N ~IMB 30.00
04360 HO2Z, ~Y APR/~N EI~ 27.00
01609 HOLY F~ILY ~DI~ CE~ F~-~PD~ PHYSIC~S 395.00
P~-~PLO~ PHYSIC~S 541.00
936.00
04748 I~ I~'RON PAtaK 6/29 425.63
iCM~-RON PAtaK 425.63
851.26
00106 I~ ~I~ TRUST - 401 i~-R.PA~K 468.19
!~'RON PAtaK 425.63
PAYRO~ FOR ' 072700 316.93
I210.75
00107 I~ ~TI~ TRUST ' 457 PAYROLL FOR ' 072~00 14980.08
00108 ILAINOIS DEP~ OF ~E PAYROLL FOR - 072700 1690036
00109 I~INOtS ~ICIP~ ~TI~ ~AYROLL ~R - 072700 237
01122 ILLINOIS STATE DISB~ ~IT PAYROLL ~R ' 072700 519.23
PAYROLL ~R ' 072700 I95.50
PAYRO~ FOR - 072700 126.00
PAY~ ~ - 072700 60.00
900.13
01725 I~D DETDIT DEISEL-~LISON SHI~ iNDI~TOR ~P I0.62
01728 INR ~GISTER-J.~E~HY 64.00
REPORT: APBOAMDMPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 I5:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 I2:47 PAGE 6
RELEASE iD :
ViL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
MOM JULY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01751 INVENTORY TRADING CO POLO SHIRTS 197,25
01896 S.C. LICHT COMPANY PAINTING SUPPLIES 77.92
PAINTi'.;G SUPPLIES 22.69
PAiNTiNG SUPPLIES 43.98
144.59
01828 JANDRI$, MAURA ADVANCE 60.~O
ADVANCH-CONFE~NCE 877.83
938.33
00353 JAMONIS, MICHAEL E. SUPPLIES 57.35
LUNCH ~G. 29~10
LUNCH ?.G. 23.14
5XPENRES 368.00
477.89
01774 JIRAN, JIM APR/JJN REINS 27.00
01775 JKL CONSULT. CIVIL ENGRS, 5TD. SIUS'N~2K INPROV~ENTS 1006.00
01783 JOURNAL & TOPICS N~SPANERS Fk~E~S ~RKET 900.00
05136 JUHL, JON REI~U~F2{T 328.75
01794 MALE ~IFO~S, INC. ~IFO~ SUPPLIES 61.00
~IFO~ SUPPLIES 97.35
UNIFOk~ SUPPLIES 288.35
MiSC.UNiFO~S i0812.10
11258.~0
05144 ~STLER, ~ ~D LINDA ~D 25.00
01851 ~B SAFETY SUPPLY 3 ~ ~TS 22.02
01915 LUNDIN, ~Y APR/~ ~I~ 42.00
01918 LUNDSTKOM'S ~ERY STO~ D~GE 3850.00
TURF MOWING 4209.48
TURF MOWING 1301.47
9360~95
01927 M & K ~DIATO~ INC. A/C C~P~SSOR 139.75
04014 ~ILBOXES ETC. SHIPPING C~GES 25.54
SHIPPING C~GES 38.65
64.19
01950 ~N, D~ aP~/~ ~I~ 42.00
REPORT: APROARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RuN{ TEURSDAY ~L2700 12:47 PAGE 7
REL~SE iD :
VILLAGE OF MOU~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRO~ ~LY I4 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR N~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~OUNT
04956 MCDONALD'S PRISONER FOOD I05.02
01979 MCI WIELESS SEUICE i011.07
SEUICE 78.86
SEUICE-52-68039 87.10
SEUICE-52~68011 119.24
1296.27
01989 MC~, ~R~HY APR/~N ~IMB 30.00
04406 ~N~, IK. ESCROW INTE~ST 880.84
05021 ~N~DS L~THR GL~ES 65.89
MISC. SUPPLIES 34.84
MISC.SUPPLIES 104 .I4
204.87
00116 ~3D FEDE~ C~DIT ~I~ PAYROLL FQK - 972700 715.00
00117 METDROLIT~ ~L!kNCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 072700 546.00
02046 MOBILE PRI~ INC. BUSINESS C~DS 105.00
BUSINESS CADS 60.00
LETTEreD i28.55
~O PADS 38.30
331.85
02047 MO~PP, ~RIS APR/~N ~t~ 6.00
02066 MOU~ PROSPE~ CHEER OF C~RCE B~F~T 20.00
04178 M~ PROSPECT FI~ DEPT. ~TI~ ~D ~T/P~TY 86.00
02075 M~ PROSPE~ VACATIONS INC. AtRFAIR 662.00
05137 ~SIL, JOSEPH ~D LINDA ~L ESTATE T~S~R T~ ~BAT 620.00
02107 ~PA-HEIGHTS A~I~ SUPPLY ~LIR KS 1095.58
02127 NATION~ ~ SPENSER ~S~. ~E~HI~ 85.00
02129 ~TION~ H~T ~D ROaR CORPOR ~E G~ LINE 786.00
02155 N~EL C~tCATIONS N~EL S~CE 137.89
AC~ 00~5487469-8 T~ 332.29
ACCT 0005462381-~ T~ 82.85
AC~ 0005462381-4 T~ 165.70
AC~ 0005487469-8 340.45
T~ llJ9
ACCT 0005462381-4 80.20
T~ 2.75
ACCT 0005371729-~ 163.80
~ 5.64
REPORT: ASBOARDRPT GENE.RATED: 5 NOV 99 !5:58 HUN: THU~DAY JUL2?C0 !2:47 PAGE 8
RELEASE 13 :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF SILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD DE TRUSTEES
FROM JULY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT
1323.36
02170 NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRNG REGISTER-ADDANTE/H. ANE 650.00
~GISTER-ETE~O/JOLiE 100.00
750.00
02189 NORT~EST CENT~5 DISPATCH SYS AUGUST ASSESSLNTS 28122.34
AUGUST ASSESSMENTS 7030.58
35152.92
02193 NORTH~ST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 369.69
ELECTRIC~ SUPPLIES 521.68
891.37
02194 NORTH~ST FI~ ~TINGUISHER & FI~ EXTINGUISHER 238.12
02199 NORT~ST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 36.34
05124 NORTH~STE~g ~iVE~ITY ~GiSTER M.MEISTER 600.00
04140 N~Y PUBLIC ASS~IATION FEES-C.WIDMER 4!.00
02206 N~, TH~ J. ~!MBU~E~ 30.00
02212 ~OYS AEISU~ PRODUCTS BI~ ~CK 90.00
02228 DAMON PUILAION H~THCA~ MEALS 1170.00
02230 OFFIC~ C~DIT P~ OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.69
02238 ON TIME ~SS~GER SERVICE DELIVERY 25.25
02256 PAD~K PUBLICATIONS, INC. AD'S 468.95
AD'S 518.00
AD 34.I9
1021.14
02259 PAGENET ~AL SERVICE 293.16
SEU!CE 106.80
399.96
00409 PA~K, R~ALD W. ~I~U~E ~P~SES 472.60
02281 PC ~GAZINE K ~ZINE 39.97
05156 PRCE G~DEN ~NATION-S.BEESLEY 75.00
00123 PEBSCO PAYROLL DR - 072700 16570.94
05123 PHOENIX PI~ DE~.S~INAR ~ND ~GiST~TION 798.00
02858 PIR~, ~THI APR/~ ~I~ 39.00
RD.5ORT: APROAROR~ GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 !2:47 PAGE 9
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRDSEN?ED TO THE BOARD OF TRUBTEES MtOM J~Y 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEPT V~NROR NBR VEN~R N~ I~OICE DRSCRI~ION ~OUNT
00124 ROLICE PENSION ~ND PAYROLL FOR - 072?00 15123.79
04921 POPE, ELIZABETH a. PAYROLL FOR - 072700 925.08
02339 PROH~, A~E APR/~N ~I~ 2L00
02344 PREISER ~I~n ROS~ITAL ST~YS-~NE 2000 200.00
02362 PDSPECT' B~D B~STE~ AD-B~D C~PETITION
02360 PROSPECT DI~ SHOP DRY SUiT ~PAIR 70.00
02379 QUILL CORPO~TION SUPPLIES 53.~i
02380 QU!N~ PUBLISHING C~P~Y BL~ PEkMITS 79.00
02384 ~DIO S~CK VALOUS BAKERIES 98.66
02390 ~I~Z, INC. ~OV~ OF STO~ DEBRIS 12000.00
02393 ~Y O'HE~ON CO.,INC. ~CROiT ACAD~Y UNIFO~ i68.90
02396 ~ OFFICE PROD & ~ POLICE-OFFICE SUPP 229.66
02433 RICER, ~F~Y ~PENSES 951.68
05152 ROBERTS, TOBY C5~HING ALL~CE 67.54
02468 RO~E 12 ~ CO., INC. BRUSN CHIPPER ~ 4945.00
04673 S~ BE~INO COUEY CHILD SUPPORT PA~--~S PAYROLL ~R - 072700 211.85
02494 SA~-A-P~ A~PTI~ C~ER STAYS ~Y & ~E 175.00
02495 SAY~ C~P~ER SOURCE ~PAIR PRI~ERS 310.00
00125 SEIU L~ 73 PAYROLL FOR - 072700 484.50
02536 SU~N SPECI~TIES INC. SUPPLIES 227.11
04160 SKINDINGSRUDE SC~T ~PENSES 65.00
02592 S~ECI~ T ~L~ITED T-SHiRTS 180.50
~5158 SUS~ K~N B~T C~C~'FO~DATION ~NATI~-ROF~ 50.00
02670 SWIDE~KI 5E~RONICS IK~ ~RAIR OF ~ 162.00
02672 SYST~ D~, INC. ~LOPES 309.00
~LOgRS 285.75
C~H ~CEI~ ~ 429.55
A~ CERTIF. 245.70
1270.00
04058 SZ~OR, JIM APR/~N ~I~ 21.00
REPIET: APBOAMDRPT GENE~TED: 5 NOV 89 !5:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 12:47 PAGE
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF DILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~,~JULY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
RE~? VENDOR NRE VENDOR NB~RE !~fOiCD DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02680 TELETRAC, INC~ SERViCE-~LY,2000 1176.00
02244 THE ORGAMIZED LXECUTi~ SUBSCRiPTiON 147.00
05138 THIREJUNG, TONY & IRENE REAL ESTATE TM REBATE 670.00
03138 THOMAS, LUCY REiMHDRE~CENT 18.00
02691 THOMPSUN ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS $EUiCE-ICLY 60.00
02697 TIMEMARE, INC. P~TE CLAMP 106.40
05157 T~VERSA, VITO REBATE PUBLIC WALK 245.00
02736 U.S. IDENTIFICATION D3UAL M.~NUL 72.50
02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTASE 06983947 3000.00
00127 UNITED waY PAYROLL FOR - 072700 393.00
05149 UNITROL/STINGRE SPIRE SYST~S ~DiG ~DAR MAiNT. 152.30
02792 VEP~EER-ILLINOIS, INC BRUSH CHIPPER RENTAL 3300.00
02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC.OFFiCE SUPPLIES 66.55
00128 VIL~GE OF MOIP~T PROSPECT PAYRCLL FOR - 072700 17597.19
W~.TER/RE~R 62.90
17660.09
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WILES PAYROLL FOR - 072700 136840.37
PAYROLL FOR - 072700 18554.37
PAYROLL FOR - 072700 12461.88
PAYROLL FOR - 072900 58.96
167915.58
02821 VON BRIESEN,PURTELL&ROIER,S.C. SEU!CE-FEES 18873.20
01228 W.S DARLEY & CO. BOOTS i79.08
02832 ~%L-MART STORES, INC. CHARGES 81.00
MISC.SUPPLIES 49.89
130.8g
02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT STORA~ HCXES 191.52
04189 WITTENBURG, RUTH aPR/J~r~ REIMB 33.00
02893 WOLF CAMERA, INC. PHOTO PRO~ESSING 30.00
PHOTO PRO~ESSING 26.72
PHOTO PRO~ESSING 16.18
PHOTO PRO~ESSING 65.00
PN~..O PRC~ESSING 42.58
R~PORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV ~9 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 12147 PAGE i1
R~LEASE iD
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT , ,
LIST OF SILLS P~SENTED TO THE SOAMD OF TRUSTEES ~ JULY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
...................................................................................................................................
DE~? VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION
...................................................................................................................................
180.48
04226 WOSICK, cnn APR/JUN REIMR 36.00
TOTAL 562603.73
02016 ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY REFESE 51629.60
RE~SE 20248.67
REFOSE 31112.45
R~FUSS 2922.81
RE,SE 10192.01
~FESE
R~FESS 7187.67-
RE,SE 1663,36-
164673.79
TOTAL 164673.79
O5O
02167 ARROW ROAD CONSTRVCTiDN R~SURFACING PROGi~%i~ 44569.99
02367 PSI SERVICE 924.00
TOTAL 45493.99
07O
04944 ATLAS RRSTO~TION 20t ~E GO TRAIL 10335.00
01021 CAMPFIR~ BOYS AND GI~S CAMP PRO~It~ 383].32
CAMP PRO,RAM 666.67
CAMP RRC~kt~ 3833.34
8333.33
01050 CEDA NORT~ST SELF-NELP ClOT SERVICES 23~5.83
01114 CLAYGRO~D, INC. SERVICE 3000.00
00335 FOLEY, APRIL B. ~EI~B 56.97
05131 EOPE NO~ INC. PROOECT/DAY CENTER 35000.00
04227 L~ING FOR LIFE SEPT.BILLING 1250.00
02256 PANDOCK PUBLI~TIONS, INC. AD'S 74.59
02419 RESOURCE CENTER ~R THE ~DE~ PR~ AOTUITIRS 875.00
02659 SUB~ P~Y H~TH CO~CIL SEUICES 708.3~
SERVICE 708.33
1416.66
05151 WALTER JR,& ARS~., LOUIS K. SINGLE F~ILY ~ 500.00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JJL2700 12:47 PAGE 12
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LiST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
~ JULY 14 2000 TO J~LY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~E INVOICE DESCRI~IBN A~MOU~
T~AL : 63237.38
510
04952 CiO~A G~OUP INC. SERVICE I055.54
01422 FOLGERS FLAG & DECO,TING, INC CO~CT ~R ST~ET LIGHT
01596 HINES L~BER, EDWARD SIDING FOR GENE~L STO~ 2070.00
01610 H~E DEP~ ~TERIAL ~R GENE~L STO~ 101.81
05155 HTE INC. SOKWA~ I800.00
05084 LEIBOFORTH, ROBERT SIDING NAILS 35.98
01957 ~ERTEK VIDEO SUPPLY SUPPLIES 232.53
T~AL : 6295.86
55O
01791 K-PLUS E~IRO~NTAL, INC. SEUICES 890i.00
02521 SDI CONSULT~S LTD. SEUICES 12769.93
CONSTRUCTION 600.80
13370.73
T~AL 22271.73
56O
02167 ~ ROAD CONSTRUCTION ~CONSTRU~ION PR~ 173111.25
173111.25
59O
04324 B~K ONE PAYING AGE~ ~E 800.00
02476 ~TH TECH INC ~D~SSI~AL SERVICES 37560.00
ENGINEERING SEU 32021.54
69581.54
01806 R~TEN ~CHIN & ZUIS 8~D COUNSEL ~E 7515.46
T~ 77897.00
610
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~T~IAL CO. MISC.~DW~ & BUILDING 302.17
MISC.~DW~ & BUILDING 3.70
MISC.~D~ & BUILDING 345.17
651.04
01620 ~RIC~ ~DSCAPING INC. PA~AY ~STO~TION 2763.75
02451 ~ER METER INC WATER ~TEK 4946.00
~PORT: APBOARDRST GENE~TED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 12:47 PAGE !3
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~RENTED TO TEE BCA.RD OF TRUSTEES FR~ ~LY !4 2000 TO 7GLY 27 2000
...................................................................................................................................
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR N~ME i!,7OICE DESCRIPTION ~OUNT
...................................................................................................................................
;~A?ER METERS 5785.32
10731.32
01313 DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC. TOPSOIL 165.00
05047 ELGIN S~EPING SERVICES, INC. CQNT~.CTUAL CREWING 2410.00
Ci~ BASiNS/INLETS I690.00
05143 G~USZ~, JOSEPH EE~ND 3.35
~ND 0.35
3.70
01544 HBK ~TER ~TER SERVICE L%BOR & M~TERIALS 369.00
~BOR & MATERi~S 2286.i5
L~OR & F~TERIAL 1948.60
LABOR & ~%TERIALS 2054.70
6658.45
01896 J.C. LICE C~P~Y PA!~ING SUPPLIES 273.86
PAINTING SUPPLIRS 367.37
641.23
01427 JOSEPH D. ~ & CO. P~TS 1277.82
01787 ~LtE, INC. SEUICE C~GES 357.60
01878 ~E-~STE~ C~P~Y,INC ~OVE,~PAIR TO DEEP ~LL 12250.00
05130 LO,DE CONSTRUCTION ~Pai~' 9750.00
01918 L~DSTR~'S ~ERY ~F MOWING 360.03
TUU M~ING 120.0I
480.04
02155 N~5 C~ICATI~S ACCT 0005487469-8 & T~I 330.55
ACCT005487469-8 & T~ 81.53
ACCT 0005487469-8 & T~ 163,95
576,03
02193 NORT~ST ELE~RtC~ SUPPLY 5ECTRIC~ SUPPLIES 503.47
ELE~RI~ SUPPLIES 10.60
514.07
02320 PL~L ~PE~ ~CYCLD POLO ~GS 200.00
05146 ~O, ROBERT A. ~D 232.15
~D 24.22
REPORT: A.=DOARDRP? GENE~TED: 5 NO7 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 12:47 PAGE !4
RELEASE iD :
VIL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF DILLS PBESE~SD TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JULY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~OICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT
258.37
05142 P~AH~D, ANIL RE,NO 24.45
RE,ND 2.45
2~.~0
02524 SEARS HD~ SUPP I19.89
02735 U.S. FILTER DISTRIB~ION GROUP LIOS W/~LUGS 420.00
LiDS 954.00
~PAi~ 1640.29
3014.29
05150 ZAFiROPOULOS, VASIL!KI RE,ND 40.20 '
RE,ND 4.90
44.20
TUTAL : 54581.70
63O
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TERIAL CO. MISC.HAMDWARE & BUILDING 54.42
02193 NORTh~ST ELECTRIC~ SUPPLY ELE~RIC~ SUPPLIES 3!.69
02212 N~OYS LEISU~ PRODUCTS BI~ ~CK 750.00
02754 UNION PACIFIC ~ILROAD ~D L~SE-~NE 1184.59
02806 VIL~GE OF M~ PROSPECT WATER 18.50
T~AL : 2039.20
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TE~AL CO. MISC.~W~ & BUILDING 38.84
01937 ~TI~H TI~, INC. SERVICE 120.07
TRUCK TI~ B~CE i!0.00
230.07
02823 BILL'S ~ & PO~R ~PAIR P~TS 56.21
02938 BO~ DISTRIBUTION CE~ER HD~/P~TS 907.08
01006 BUSSE ~ ~H, INC. CAR WASH 783.75
05129 CO~O~-INDUSTRI~ SUPPLY SUPPLIES 128.36
01289 ~UG~S TRUCK PARTS P~TS 234.11
03958 ~UND I~E~ATIONAL ~CK UP LIGHT SKTC~ 35.12
01511 ~DY~R SERVICE STO~S TI~S 199.27
~DY~ ~NGLER GSA 184.24
~PORT: A~SCANDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 i2:-.7 PAGE 15
RELRARE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LiST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM ~LY 14 2000 TO JULY 27 2000
DRET VENDOR NRE VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~.OUNT
~EELS 70.00
WHEELS 70.00
TIRES 401.28
924.79
01705 ILLINOIS RECOVERY SYSTLMS PICK UP WASTE MUTOR OIL 72.00
01750 INTERSTATE BATTERY I~ER~TATE BATTERY 143.90
01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. AUTO PARTS !237.78
AUTO PARTS 532.98
1770.76
02059 MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE ~EST AUTO PARTS 775.00
02194 NONTHWHST FIRE ~XTINGUISRER ~ FI~E EXTINGUISRWH 238.13
02320 PLEZALL WIPERS RECYCLED POLO RAGS 400.00
02374 QUALITY DISCOUNT AbTO PANTS ANTO REPAIR PANTS 91.29
04101 SPI DISTRIBUTION INC. AIRTEX WATER P~MP 84.94
SPI RADIATOR 171.42
256.36
04472 TREOR PETROLE~ CO ~ASANOL 9643.23
02769 UNTOWH AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PANTS 341.92
REPAIR PARTS 871.53
1213.45
02913 ZIEBANT RUSTFR~F 350.00
T~ : 18292.45
6T0
04424 BRITT EQUI PWH/~ MUDFLAP 340.88
01511 G~DYEAR SERVICE STORES WHEELS 75.00
TUT~ : 415.88
690
02927 BOESCHE, JIM REPAIR BRICK WALL 3875.00
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. INS. C~S-GAN 18516.21
01306 DRUG CARD, INC. CAND CLAIMS 1000t.i6
02208 NSO IMSURANCE-M. FLOREY 89.00
02550 SIGN PALACE RE-It'TTER-~00-10366 95.00
QUARTER PANEL P-12 260.00
· "-"PORT: APBOARDRPT GENEkATED: 5 NOV 99 I5:58 RUN: THURSDAY ~L2'3C 12:47 PAGE 16
~L~SE iD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JULY 14 2000 TO J~LY 27 2000
2EPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
885.00
02852 ~RDERITCH, PJ{NDALL REiMBURSAMENT 71.98
TOTAL 32908.35
01027 CAPITAL G.~.INS INC. I~JESTM.MG~-JtTLY 2!58.00
04890 SEGALL BRYA~ & H~ILL I~EST. M~ 6730.64
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT FROSPE~ PAYROLL FOR - 072800 8775.07
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - ~AYROLL W!~S PAYROLL FOR - 072800 16813.16
T~.~ 34476.87
'20
01027 CAPITAL GAINS INC. I~EST. M~-~LY 2732.00
04890 $EGALL BRY~ & HAMILL I~ST. MG~ 4/! 750i.66
00128 VILLAGE OF MOU~ PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 073100 9258.02
04314 VIL~GE OE MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WI~S PAYROLL FOR - 073100 13975.55
T~ 33467.23
730
00128 VIL~GE OF MO~ PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 072900 344.28
04314 VIL~GE OF MO~T PROSPECT - PAYROLL WI~S ~AYROLL FOR - 072900 200.00
T~AL 544.28
770
02513 ABE~ETHY, J~ET T. ~EX C~P 242.38
01867 ~DLER, GLEN R. ~ C~P 3659.00
02667 BEH~, DAVID ~ C~P 620.00
02921 BLUE, MIC~L ~ C~P 95.00
~ C~P 416.64
511.64
02948 BRIBER, I~A ~ C~P 500.00
02949 BROUSS~U, ~D~W J. ~ C~P 996.46
04672 BRO~, STEVE ~ C~P 158.00
03760 BU~S, PAUL ~ C~P 217.90
01035 C~EY, ~U~EN ~X C~P 21.98
~?OP, T: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THU~DAY o-GL2700 12:47 PAGE 17
~LEASE iD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT ?ROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRESENTED TO THE HOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ ~LY 14 2000 TO ~LY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR ~N~R N~E I~OICE DESCRIPTION kMOUNT
01241 DAWSON, HENRY C. FL~ COMP 34.10
01259 DEUTSC~N, TRUDY M. ~ C~P 41.00
04840 EVES, ~RG~ET 5~ C~P 85.00
01415 FLO~Y, ~GA~T T. FL~ COMP 561.20
01421 FOLEY, APRIL B. FL~ COMP 238.48
5~ C~P 833.36
I071.84
05121 GHAWALY, MICHEL 5~ C~P 90.00
01541 GUTIE~Z, ~LIE M. 5~ C~P 83.50
04731 HUNT, JEF~RY ~ C~P 604.00
01942 ~ALCO~, JOHN J. 5~ COMP 263.00
04933 MCELDE~Y, SYLVIa 5~ C~P 1.62
02b17 MIDDLE~, JO~ 5~ C~P 398.17
02054 MORG~, N~CYL~ M. 5~ C~P 411.97
02433 EC~R, ~F~Y 5~ C~P 53.50
02458 RO~Y, J~S S. ~ C~P 191.02
02473 R~O~, CINDY JO 5~ C~P 453.87
02508 SCH~TZ, WALTER A 5~ C~P Ii6.57
02631 STEPH~S~, MICHEL R. 5~ C~P 140.00
5~ C~P 200.04
340.04
02644 STOL, DUID 5~ C~P 290.50
02687 THILA, D~IS R. 5~ C~P 3t.56
02710 T~CY, RIC~ L. 5~ C~P. 160.80
02741 U~LINI, RIC~ ~ C~P 1375.89
02855 ~ER, MIC~L T. ~ C~P 454.43
T~ : 14040.94
790
05140 A&L CONSTRUCTION ~RPA~E~ 17.50
04324 B~K ONE ~!MBU~ 195.50
,v.~. APDOARDRPT GENE~TED: 5~,'~'~ 99 ::'"='..: RU}h THURSZAY J002700 12:47 PAGE
RELL~SE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LiS/ CF BILLS P~ESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~CM iJLY 14 2000 TO 3JLY 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIETiON AMOUNT
01719 iMRF PREMI~-JULY 2000 282.00
PReMIUM-AUGUST 2000 420.00
702.00
00111 INDIANA DEPT OF REVENUE INCOME TAX-~LY 120.77
05145 KLEREK, ?EOM~%S & NklC= OVERPAYM-ENT 10.00
04406 MENAMD, iNC. ESCROW RE,ND 25000.00
02069 MOUNT PROSPECT PA~ DISTRICT TAP-CONTRIB 500.00
05147 SO~LANIO, RONALQ RE~JND 50.00
02623 STATE OF I~LIL.. LIQUOR .~=O~D ~=~K 76.00
05148 STEELE & LOEBER RE'ND 100.00
02689 THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT iiURi BOND MONEY 1146.00
BONE MONEY 550.00
BOND MDNEY 3782.00
BOND MDNEY 1606.00
7084.00
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSREC PAYROLL FOR - 072900 6897.09
DISBU~S~BNTS 2500.00
DISBURSEMENTS 10550.00
19947.09
02886 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVF2~E INC~E TAX-J~LY 211.81
TOTAL 54014.67
GRAND TOTAL 1360366.30
REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 !5:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL2700 i2:47 PAGE 19
RELEASE iD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF PILLS PRERE~ED i$ TEE PCARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JULY !4 2000 ~OJJLY 27 2000
$L~,'~%RY BY KJND
101 GENERAL FUND 562803.73
~30 REFUSE DISPOSAL FJND 164873.79
;50 MOTOR F]EL TAX FUND 45493.99
L70 CO.UNITY DEVELP~JT BLOCK GRNT 63237.38
5i0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 6295,86
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPWNT CONST 22271.73
560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 173111.25
590 FLOOD CONTROL COEST FUND 77297.00
8!0 WATER AND SEWER KJND 54581,70
830 PARRING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 2339.20
860 VEHICLE ~INTENANCE FUND 18292.45
870 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 4!5.88
{98 RIEMRANAGWNENT END 32908.35
rio POLICE PENSION FOND 34476.87
r2O FIRE PENSION FUNP 33467.23
'30 BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND 544.28
'i0 FLEXCOWN ESCROW FUND 14240.94
'90 ESCROW DEPOSIT FJND 54514.67
TCUAL: 1362386.30
Village of Mount ProSpeCt
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: JULY 27, 2000
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE
(RETAIL PACKAGE SALES)
DOMINICK'S FINER FOODS, INC., 1145-55 MT. PROSPECT PLAZA
On Wednesday, July 26, 2000, the Village Manager met with a number of
representatives from Dominick's including Frank Cannistra, District Manager; Marie
Tillmann, Property Administrator; Judith Rogers, Manager/Lease and License
Administration and Store Manager Eva Calenda to discuss Dominick's request for the
issuance of a Class C Liquor License. The Class C Liquor License provides for the sale
of all alcoholic packaged goods.
The Dominick's Food Store located at the southeast edge of Mt. Prospect Plaza has
been in existence for well in excess of ten years. It is a full-service grocery operation
that, up to this point, has not held a Liquor License for the sale of packaged goods. The
Dominick's Food Store located at Golf and Elmhurst Roads and the Jewel Food Store
located at Randhurst Shopping Center each hold a Class C Liquor License.
Mr. Cannistra indicated that Dominick's corporate wishes to standardize the operation of
all of its stores and would like to add the sale of liquor to the mix of food stuffs and other
products available to its customers at this location.
Ms. Rogers reviewed with the Village Manager the corporate policies and programs in
place governing the training of employees regarding the sale of alcohol. Dominick's has
an extensive imhouse Bassett-type training program that all employees receive upon
hire. Management staff also receives extensive training regarding the topic and
refresher courses are given at regular intervals. Ms. Rogers indicated that violation of
the liquor sale policy is grounds for termination of an employee and they take the
responsibility very seriously.
he Village Manager discussed at length with those in attendance the Village's
particular sensitivity regarding the sale of alcohol to minors as well as sale to clearly
intoxicated persons. All indicated that they had read the Village's Liquor Code and
understood all of its requirements, especially Store Manager Ms. Calenda. The Village
Manager indicated that all employees of the establishment were held to the same level
of accountability regarding Liquor Code requirements and that the transgression of a
single employee, no matter how unintentional, would result in stiff sanctions imposed by
the Village.
The Application, as submitted, is complete. All fees have been paid and appropriate
persons have submitted to fingerprinting and background checks. All documents are on
file.
If this request is favorably considered, adoption of an Ordinance creating a Class C
Liquor License would be in order. Prior to the issuance of the Liquor License, an
approved plan for the stocking of liquor in a controlled area must be on file and
verification that all existing store employees have received a refresher liquor servers'
training course has been received. District Manager Cannistra is agreeable to these
conditions.
cM:EJ/rC~ommunity Development Dire~S Police Chief Ronald Pavlock
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That in accordance with Subsection A of Section 13.108 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, the Corporate Authorities shall determine the number of Liquor Licenses
available in each Classification and shall establish a list specifying the number of Liquor Licenses authorized.
Said list is hereby amended by increasing the number of Class C Liquor Licenses by One (1) Dominick's,
1145-55 Mt. Prospect Plaza. Said list is as follows:
Zero (0) Class A License
Two (2) Class B Licenses
Nine (9) Class C Licenses
One (1) Class D License
Two (2) Class E Licenses
One (1) Class G License
Zero (0) Class H License
Zero (0) Class M License
Zero (0) Class P License
Seventeen (17) Class R Licenses
Sixteen (16) Class S Licenses
One (1) Class T License
Five (5) Class W Licenses
SECTION TVVO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Village President
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Class Establishment Number
A 0
B Dumas Walter's; Ye Olde Town Inn 2
C Alvee's Liquors; Balzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Dominick's (Mt. Prospect Plaza~:
Gold Eagle Liquors; Jay Liquors;
Mt. Prospect Liquors; Osco Drugs;
Walgreens (83 and Golf) 9
D Prospect Moose Lodge 1
E Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall 2
G Mt. Prospect Park District-Golf Course 1
H 0
M 0
P 0
R Artemis; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Cuisine of India;
Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); Hah River;
House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; LaTejanita;
Little America; Nina Restaurant; Pusan; Red A Chinese
Restaurant; Rva Bella; Sakura; Taqueria Fiesta; Torishin 17
S Applebee's; Bella Capri; El Sombrero;
Jake's Pizza; Jameson's Charhouse; Kampai;
The Loft; Mrs. P & Me; New Shin Jung; Nikki D's Charhouse;
Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant; Pap's Grill & Bar;
Retro Bistro; Rokudenashi; Sam's Place 16
T Thunderbird Lanes
W Frankie's Fast Food; Los Ar¢os Restaurant;
Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs
54
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER '~l~, ~J~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~'~ I~l~
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-20-2000 - 802 S. WILLIAM STREET
VARIATION TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE IN A REQUIRED SIDE YARD
SETBACK
STEVE AND MARLO SIAVELIS - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Variation to allow construction of a detached
garage in a required side yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their June 22, 2000 meeting.
The proposal is a request for Variation to permit a detached garage to encroach approximately 2 feet into the required
five-foot side interior setback. The proposed garage would be located in the same location as the existing garage and
the petitioner would use the existing concrete pad. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff memo.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed Variation in terms of Zoning Code Variation Standards. Some ZBA
members noted that constructing the new garage per code would increase the amount of lot coverage and could exceed the
amount of lot coverage permitted. There was discussion about having to reconstruct the deck and fence if the garage was
located five feet off the property line, and how the approach into the garage could be difficult to maneuver. The ZBA
members found that these conditions constituted a hardship. Based on that finding, the ZBA voted 4-0 to recommend
approval of the proposed Variation to permit a detached garage to encroach two feet into the required five foot setback at 802
S. William Street, Case No. ZBA-20-2000.
[Wiliiam J. ~ooney Jr., AICP
MINUTES OF ['HE
CASE NO, ZBA-20-2000 Hearing Datei ~June22, 2000
PETITIONER: Steve Ziavelis
802 S. WilliamSt.
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7, 2000 DAI£YHERALD
REQUEST: Variation to permit a detached garage to encroach into a required sideyard
setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Flores
Elizabeth Luxem
Keith Youngqu!st
Arlene juraeek~ Ch/urperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, .Deputy Director of Community Developmem
Judy Conn0lly, Sehi6r Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Steve & Marlo Siavelis
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called tile meeth~g to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. At 7:45, Ms. Juraeck announced Case ZBA-20-2000, a request for a Variation to permit the construction of
a detached garage to encroach imo a required sidevard setback.
Judy Conoolly, Senior Planner, stating that nofi~ had been provided in the form of a newspaper ad, mailed notices,
and a sign on the subject Pro~rty' §lie described tlie Petiti0~er's reasons for the proposed Variation to permit a
detached garage to encroach into a required sideyard setback. She said the petitioner wished to demolish his existing
garage and construct a new garage on thc existing slab. which is 2.97' 0ffthe lot lit/e'. Current code requires a serb/tek
$'. In order to COnstruct the new garage, petitioner wo~ld need a Variation. She stated that the petitioner's motivation
for the request is to retain a brick'Wall and deck that connects the garage to the house. This property is in flood plain;
howe,~er, the petitioner will not be changing the size or location of the garage so flood plain regulations do not apply.
Although the proposed Variation may not have a negative effect on neighborhood character, the submittal does not
support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these fmdings, S/afl recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board denial df the proposed
Variations to permit a detached garage to encroach approximately 2' into a required sideyard setback. The Village
Board's decision is final for this case.
· Steve Siavelis was sworn in and testi[,~ed his garage Was badly deteriorated and needed to be replaced. He..al,~.o stated
that the.Slab is in good eon. d. ifion and ihe pl..ann~e~., to build the new garage on .the 01d slab. He reiterated his desire to
keep the wood deel~ and brick fence.cgnn&~ing .the garage to'the h~use, He also stated that moving the~. locatinri of the
gnrage'would make. it'impossible t~ baCk-out without hitting the house. .'
Mr. Floros asked ifhe had built the original garage and Mr..Siav.e? said that the garage ~ there when he had bought
the house~' Mr. Floros a~kedhow old tho garage. Was and Mr.' Siavelis res'.l~.nded that it was 25 -30 years old:' Mr.
.FlOr°s inquired if the neighboi', who isbullding a two-car garage;. had any objections to .his plans to replace.th~ garage
in'the same location Mr; Siavelis Said he did not. '
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-20-2000
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson Page 2
Arlene Juraeek explained that when staff makes their evaluation of petitioners~ requests they must be careful that the
criteria presents a true hardship as defined by code. She said she realized it would began actual hardship for the
petitioner to relocate the garage. Ms. Juraeek pointed 6ut the petitioner's plan would be a straightf6rward ~0~e to one
replaeemant.
Mr. Floros said he agreed, that this ease met the layman's definition of hardship and he saw no problem with replacing
the garage.
Keith Youngquist said the pr0peny was very close to lot coyerage and to move the garage back would increase the
amount of lot coverage. He Said he ~:~ncUrred ~i~h Other ~oar~l~ me~iber's comments.
Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to recommend approval of the request to permit a detached garage to encroach into a
required sideyard setback. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYE~FI0,ros? Luxem, Youngqulst, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4-0. The Village Board's decision is final fo~: Case ZBA-20-2000.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, secoflded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
' ~u~i:'~oflY, Senior Plann~r./JY/
Village of MOunt P ospect
Community DevelOt
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE ~URACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER~,''~
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-20-2000 - VARIATION TO PERMIT A DETACHED GARAGE TO ENCROACH
INTO A REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK
BACKGROtrND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Steve and Marlo Siavelis
802 S. William
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owners of the Property
Lot Size: 8,705 square feet (approximately)
Existing Zoning: R1 Single Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage:. ' A4% existing
44% proposed
45% maximum per R1 dislrict
Requested Action: Proposal for a Variation to allow the reconstruction of a detached garage to
encroach into the required five foot side setback.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property is an existing single-story home located on a 66' X 131.9' (8,705 square feet) single-family
lot on a residential street. The existing house has a front setback of 32' from William Street. The existing
detached garage has a side setback ranging, from 2.97 to 3.33 feet. The property north of th~ subject propek'ty (800
S. William) has an attached, front~loading garage and the house is located more than 30 feet from the side lot'Yme.
The petitioner is seeking to demolish.the, existing garage and Construct a new 20' X 22' garage. The size of the
proposed new garage would not be increased and the petitioner proposes to use the existing concrete garage slab
on grade (pad)~ As the.existing side setback is 2.97', the proposed garage would bethe same distance from the
property line. The side setback requirement.for a detached accessory structure is five feet.
To conduct its analysis Of the proposed Variation, sufff reviewed the petitioner's plat-of survey and site plan and
visited the site.
BA-20-2000 - Side Setback Variation
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards
Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These
standards relate to:
A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently
having an interest in the property;
c~ lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
c~ protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The parcel is developed with a single family home with a detached garage. The subject parcel is an 8,705 square
foot lot that is located extremely close to the floodplain. Floodplain and floodway regulations could be applicable
if the petitioner proposed to enlarge the garage. Since the applicant proposes to construct a new garage on the
existing cement slab on grade (pad), floodplain and floodway regulations do not apply.
The applicant's stated reasons for the proposed variation are based on a desire to maintain the existing brick,
fence-like structure that encloses the yard and links the wooden deck to the garage. Furthermore, the petitioner
would like to maintain the existing approach and entrance to the garage. If the new garage was constructed per
the required setback, the driveway, wood deck, and brick fence-like structure would have to be reconfigured.
The condition of the lot (size, width or shape) does not make Lhe proposed encroachment necessary. The
petitioner is able to meet the five-foot setback requirement if the deck and brick fence-like structure are relocated
and or modified. There is not sufficient justification for a Variation by the above hardship standards.
The proposed garage would not likely have a negative or positive effect on the character of the existing single-
family residential area or on the public welfare.
RECOMMENDATION
Although the proposed variation would not have a significant effect on neighborhood character, the submittal
does not support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA deny the proposed Variation to permit a
garage to encroach approximately two feet (2') into the required 5-foot side interior yard setback for the residence
at 802 S. William Street, Case No. Z~A-20-2000. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
William (.-C. ooney; .-~ICP; Director of Community Development
H:~GENXPLNG~ZBAW. BA 2000~5taff MemOsW. BA-20;2000 (Siavelis ~. 802 S. Ge6rge).doc
LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
.~ NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT- Pl~ipg Division
/~-~-~me~sofl Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phon· 847.818.$328
FAX 847.818.5329
Variation Request
The Zoning Board of Appeals has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and
those variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's
Zoning Or~dinance.
PETITION FOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REVIEW ~ Village Board Final I~l ZBA Final
Case Number' :- :~:~ ,. -,~ '.:' ":";:' :.~:2. :.. : i' ':,~ '.-": :: ::.:
~ Z~A: :;:.. ::: :,:', ',.::' :' --' ". ~ ::' ' "' -' ':~. , ·
! Dcvelopment Name/Address : -' :' ' .... · "-
~ ~ Date ofSubmissign. ' · · · '- .
~ Hearing Date
, ,::., :':.fi .~
I Common Address(es) (S~'eet Number, Street)
Tar I.D. Number or County A~igned Hn Numbe~(z)
05-13- ~-o-/ -Oio --0o0o
Legal Description (attach additional sbe~ if
/ LOT 75 IN CLEARI~ROOK ESTATES, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2
OF THE WEST I/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 4! NOR;Il'I, RANGE l l,
EAST OF TIlE THIRD PRINCIPAL I('IERIDIAN LYING NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF GOLF
ROAD AS PER PLAT OF DEDICATION,, RECORDED OCTOBER Il, 1929 AS DOCUMENT
--NUMBER 10494973, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID CLEARBROOK ESTATES,-
REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TrrLES OF COOK .COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
-- ON AUGUST 21,1956 AS DOCIjIvlENT NUMBER 169061L
[ ~ [ Nme ,~ Telephone(day)
I~ I'~''''°''~°". ' ..-..' T~te,,,,one(.,n,,,~) · . "
l"-'~' I ~' .z.. X- ¢-"'-":'~ '~r' "' . . ""' " .' · ,
I' ~' I Cl. .' ' I S--tn lZi~¢~*" P"~e~' . 2. ' . - ,. , ·
' ! ~ · I Inte~%~,, " ' · .'' ':':" ' . ' .. i .. .... . '
i. .1., ::'. . '. ,. :', : .....--.. .
Name Telephone (day) --
Corporation Telephone (evening)
Street Address Fax:
City State Zip Code Pager
Developer
OAk
A~orney
N~e Telephone (day)
Ad.ess F~
Su~eyor
Engineer
N~e Telephone (~y)
Architect
~me Telephone (day):
~nds~pe Architect
Telep~o~ (day); ·
Mo~I.~s~ ~p~t of~u~i~ ~velqpment Phone ~7.8'18,5328
~u~ Emenon S~eeL Mo~t ~sp~ lll~0is, 60056 F~ g47.818.5329
2 ~D g47.392.60~
ode Section(s) for which Variation(s) is (are) Requested
Summary and lustification for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justification to the Attached Standards for Variations
Ple~ no~ ~ ~e applie~on ~ not ~ aeeep~ ~ ~ petition h~ ~n ~lly completed ~d all ~ p~ md o~ m~
~v, ~n ~f~fily submiu~ to ~e P~g Dillon. It h ~ongly su~ed ~at ~e ~fifioner ~edule m appohment ~ ~e
~p~p~ Vill~e s~ so ~ mte~ e~ be ~viewed for aemcy ~d eompletene~ prior to ~bmimL
In ~mid~on of~e hfo~on con. ed h ~N ~fion ~ well ~ all ~p~g d~mmfion, R ~ ~u~ed ~t ~p~v~ ~ ~ven
to ~ ~ ~e appfi~t N ~e o~er or an~o~ ~p~senmfive of ~e o~er of ~e prope~. ~e ~tifioner ~d ~e o~er of ~e
p~ ~t employe~ of~e Village ofMo~t ~ md ~ek agenm, pem~ion to en~r on ~e p~ d~g r~onable horn
for vh~ ~e~ion of~e subj~ p~.
I he.by ~m ~ ~ ~omafion provided he~h md h ri materiah submi~d h ~s~iafion wi~ ~ appli~tion ~ ~e ~d
~ ~ ~e ~ of my ~owledge.~
AppU--t ~ 2~ Da. ~- ~' O0
If applic*nt is not property owner.
I hereby designate the applicant to act as my. agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the
associated supporting material.
Property Owner Date
'bloun~ Prospect Department of Comn~unity De~el0pment. Phone 8~7.818.5328
100 Sou{li Emerson Street, Mount Prospect lllinois, 60056" . Fax 8~7.8.18;5329
' 3 ' TDD 847.392.6064
80'7 806
so9 sos
81~ 812
81~ 814
901 * 9~0
907
909 908
911 910
91~ 912
91~ 914
917 916
919 918
Zoning District Boundary,
~-,~mm~ Village
Out of V]tlage
Scale = 1" to 300'
Location map for Case· No. ZBA-20-2000
Siavelis Residence Variation
From to 3926954 at 7/20/00 3:53 PM Pg 001/001
FRO~
PhoneTools STEVE SIAVELiS
TO VILLAGE BOARD JUL '~ o
Page(s) 1
~1 / ~,) 7/20/00 3:53 PM
~l_Message
MY NAME IS STEVE SIAVELIS, FROM 802 S. WILLIAM STREET. I RESPECTFULLY
REQUEST TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING FOR ZBA 20;2000;,I WOULD LIKE TO
START ON THE GARAGE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
CONSIDERATION.
87-20-88 83:~6 TO:HT.PROSPECT OLERK&HEALTH DEPT. FROM:
KAD
7/19/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
802 S. WILLIAM STREET
WHEREAS, Steve Ziavelis (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition
for a Variation with respect to property located at 802 South William Street
(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows:
Lot 75 in Clearbrook Estates, being a Subdivision of that part of the West ~ of the
West % of the Northeast ¼ of Section 13, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian lying North of the center line of Golf Road as per Plat of
Dedication, recorded October 11, 1929 as Document Number 10494973, according
to the Plat of said Clearbrook Estates, registered in the Office of the Registrar of
Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on August 21, 1956 as Document Number 1690611.
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation from Section 14.306.B2 of the Village
Code to construct a detached garage to encroaching 2.03 feet into the required five-
foot (5') interior side setback.
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 20-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village
of Mount Prospect on the 22"~ day of June, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice
having been published inthe Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 7th day of June,
2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation of approval to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same
meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation
would be in the best interest of the Village.
Page 2/2
802 S. William Street
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the
Village Code, to allow the construction of a garage with an encroachment of
approximately two feet (2') into the require five-foot (51) side interior yard setback
required by Village Code, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:~GEN~files\WlN\OR[;)~NANCWariation 802 S William St., Aug 2000.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~,
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMLrNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-21-2000 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
AMEND ORD. # 5039 TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,800 SQUARE FOOT
MAINTENANCE GARAGE AT A CARTAGE FACILITY
MAGGIE FILLMAN - APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve an amendment to a Conditional Use permit to allow
them conslruction ora maintenance garage at a cartage facility. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their June
22, 2000 meeting.
The Village approved the petitioner's request to operate a cartage facility at 2400 Terminal Drive last August. The
maintenance garage was not part of the original proposal and increases the intensity of the Conditional Use as
previously approved. Per Sec. 14.203.F.13 of the Zoning Ordinance, the modification requires the approval of a new
Conditional Use permit. The proposed garage will be constructed according to Village Code requirements and meet
the required setbacks. The garage will be used to conduct pre-trip inspections and used to service only those trucks
scheduled to depart from the Road Runner site. The garage hours will be 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.
The applicant has agreed to pay their fair share of the cost for a traffic study and the installation of a traffic signal if it
is deemed necessmy. The Zoning Board voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use with the
following conditions:
1. Meet all Development and Fire Code requirements for the entire site;
2. The petitioner shall enter into a covenant agreeing to pay their fair share of the cost of a traffic :study and
installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Badger Road and Oakton Street if it is determined necessary;
3. Complete all landscaping improvements prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy for the proposed garage.
William J. Cooney Jr., AICP
/JC
APPEALS
CASE NO2ZBA-21-2000 Hearing Date: June 22, 2000
PETITIONER: Maggie Fillman .
Roadrunner Express, Inc.
POB 7295'
Rosemont, IL 6001~8
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7, 2000~DAI£YHERALD
REQUEST: Amend Conditional Use Approval for a cartage facility to allow construction
o£additiona~ buildings
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Ke~ith Y~ungqui~t -
Arlene juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENTi Merrill Cottan
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Patrick t~rankin
John & Maggie Fillman
ioe Delay, 2416 Termii~al Drive
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes Of the May 25, 2000 meeting ~vere
approved. At 7::50,-after h~aring tw6~othe~ eases, ~. ~Jura~ek ~mnounced case ZBA-2122000, a request tO amend a
(~onditional Use for a cartage facility t0 allow c0n~cti0n 0f additional buildings.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner~ introduced the case and explained the Conditional Use permit was originally approved
in August of 1999. She said at this time, the petitionar plaps to construct a 4,800 sq.ft, garage to perform safety checks
and r~ular 'maintehanee for the tm~ks~ gched~led'~ g~ ih ~d out Of the R0ad*Runh~r facility. Ms; Connolly explained
~t~t, since these plans ~crc not included in the original Conditional Use the petitioner must apply for a new one. She
id that the pro~0sed garagc would meet the Zouiug C0d~ se{back requirenients and W°~ld be located further away
fi.Om the fi.o~tage than the existirm building. Hours of 6perati0Vi w~uld remain the sm;n'e. The number of trucks will
not be increase. After the garagc and parking lot a~e Constructed, the peti(ioner ~iil c0mplete all landscape
requirements ofthe original Conditional Use. Upon reyiew,of th~s case, the Village staffhad concerns about possible
accidents at Oak~on-'& Badge~ Dr. MuCh 0f ~h~ ~a is' monitored by D~s Plaine~'p¢liee however, in the area
monitored :by Mount Prospect, approx~nately 20 a96idents have been reported in the last 5 years. Increased activity
may impact traffic flow and may reqmre additional safety measures t9 m!nimize the risk of accidents,. Ms; Connolly
imnciuc~ed that the petitioner's request i~ in c0~plianee: ~vith ConditiOnal USC reCluirements, therefore, staff
reC°millehd~ ~pi~r°vl~l of th~ petiti~er/~ request wit~ ihe 3 ~i~iiditio~ li~ted'in staff~ r~rt,.incli~d~ng tha{ they Pay
their portion of any traffic'impact analysis m: improvements.
Arlene Juraeek asked for clarification regarding accidents. She noted staffs report indicated only two accidents in'the
intersection of Badger Rd. and Oakton, bu! 20 iu thc larger radius of Terminai Drive, Busse and Oakton. Ms. Juracek
said, based on that, we cannot attribute the large amount 6fae6idents to Road Runner's tracks.
Zoning Board of Appeals · . - ZBA-21-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
Page 2
Patrick Brankin, attorney with the law firm of Schain, Burney, Ross and Citron in Chicago, was sworn in and testified
that, at the original case to request a Conditional Use dis~,.us,~sion,.arose regarding a future structure to conduct pre and
post road checks, safety tests and truck maintenance. 'He ~;ti~t t0fli~ht'~ request is for a Conditi~rlal ~lse tO erect that
structure. Mr. Brankin said the proposed garage is a shed typ~ design 0fsteel construction and will be used soteIy for
road safety checks, which are very important. He said he ~yaCted to stat~f0r, the record that since the facility opened in
January, 2000, there have been no accidents with Rdhd R'u~ner ~cks. He said the petitioners had reviewed staffs
report and agreed to the conditions related to the Dey,elop~ent and Fire Codes and landscaping. They do have
concerns regarding the covenantrequiring Road Runner'S0 ~5~);'th~ir;fair~ share of a traffic study plus traffic signals.
Road Runner proposes a cap on the amount. The peti.tion~r prop0sesa cap of $2,500 or some amount the~Board deems
reasonable.
Arlene Juracek said the Board would take thaffinder advisement and ask staffto explain the fair share concept. She
said we were happy to see the business up and running and viable'and can understand the need to establish this
building.
Ms. Connolly said when staff originally proposed the fair share it was, divided equally between the number of property
owners in that area. Upon further consideration, it was th6~ht thht the'~hare should be proportional to the amount of
traffic each property generates. A fair share could be ba~ed on~thb fiumbei-' of trucks using the road on a daily basis. If
a traffic study is conducted, the consultant could be advised to look at who is generating the traffic to determine the
fair share of each property.
Ms. Juracek asked if the state or county would be involy~fJ in the traffic study.
Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development, said it is necessary to meet IDOT warrants in order to get
a traffic light. He said the traffic study would determine if the situation meets those warrants. He also said the study
would identify the volume of traffic and the potential impact of th~ Road Runner trucks on the severity of accidents.
Mr. Blue said it was staffs opinion that those wh0.b~hefi~ fr~n~ the study and signals would need to support the
endeavor.
Elizabeth Luxem asked how soon the study would be done, since the¢ost of one would.be continually rising. Michael
Blue ~aid it couid be done this year or next bu~ ~hat nd ~telSs'h~d been taken tO start ihe process.
Ms. Luxem asked if it would feasible to set a cap of.$2,500.)vithout knowing the expense involved.
Mr. Blue said that, in discussions am0ng staff, it was thought that $5,000 would be a reasonable cap for Road Runner.
Ms Juracek said the public hearing was not the place tO neg0tiate the amount of the cap and asked if the Board would
agree; as a condition of approval of recommen~tation to i~e' Village Board, that the petitioner and staff e0me'to an
agreement about the amount Of'the cap befo?~ the cas8 goes t6'the Village Board. Board mSmbers ~/greed.
Pat Brankin said the pe~titione~s agreed that they ~ould c6ntinue to work with' Village stafftO arrive at an agreeable
amount.
Elizabeth Luxe~ made a motion to r~commend approval of Case ZBA-21-2000, to amend a Conditional Use approval
for al cartage fa6ilitY, (vitk the ~ondi~i6fi that p~etifl~ficr ~0me 'to agr~emer~t with staff on a d011af amour/t ~or the
proposed covenant. Kelth Youngquist seconded the iriotidn.
UPON ROLL CALL: AXES: Floros Luxem, Youngquist and Juraeek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4-0. Village Board's decision is final in this'case.
oning Board of Appeals ,,~' ~-, ,~.,~
Arlene Juracck, Chmrperson ~ ,~ !~ ~ ~74~!?.~; ~ ~ ZBA-21~2000
.... Page 3
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, planning Secretary
Conh~,,~, Senior Planner '
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORAN~)UM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNEP~
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-21-2000 - AMEND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL (CARTAGE FACILITY) -
2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Maggie Fillman
Roadrunner Express, Inc.
P.O. Box 7295
Rosemont, IL 60018
Status of Petitioner: Property Owner
Lot Size: 2.3 acres
Existing Zoning: I1 Limited Industrial
Existing Land Use: Cartage Facility
Lot Coverage, Existing: Approximately 54,570 square feet (53.7%)
Lot Coverage, Proposed: Approximately 59,405 square feet (59.3%)
Requested Action: Petitioner is seeking to amend a previously approved Conditional Use (Ord. # 5039) to
permit construction of a 4,835 square foot garage at a cartage facility.
BACKGROUND
Proposal
The Village approved the petitioner's request to operate a cartage facility at 2400 Termanal Drive last August.
· . The applicant proposes to construct a new 4,835 square foot garage to perform safety checks and routine
maintenance inspections on the vehicles. The structure will meet the required setbacks.
Review and Approval Process
The property's current zoning is I1 Limited Industrial. The proposed cartage facility is listed as a Conditional Use
in the I1 district. The proposed garage increases the intensity of the Conditional Use as previously approved. Per
Sec. 14.203.F.13 of the Zoning Ordinance, the modification requires the approval of a new Conditional Use
.. permit.
ZBA-21-2000 Roadrunner Express, Inc.- Amend Conditional Use
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning
The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for general industrial uses end the property's
zoning is I1 Limited Industrial. The proposed modification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designation, and the use is listed as a Conditional Use in the I1 district.
Site Plan
The proposed site plan consists of the proposed garage and the existing facilities. The existing structures on the
site would remain with no changes. The site has been improved in keeping with the conditions of Zoning
approval: new landscaping has been installed along a portion of the property, the existing fence has been
relocated, and a dumpster enclosure was installed. The petitioner proposes to improve the parking lot and install
the remaining landscaping after the proposed garage is completed.
As noted in the original Conditional Use application, the existing office structure is setback 10 feet fi.om the side
property line, where 15' is required. The existing parking lot encroaches into the same side setback and also into
the required 30' front setback. The non-cunformities to the side setback requirements would remain, but are
adjacent to another industrial property. Per Zoning Code Section 14.402, non-conforming buildings and
structures may be continued and expanded, so long as the non-conformities are not expanded and no non-
conformities are created.
The proposed garage will be constructed according to Village code requirements and meet the required setbacks.
The garage will be used to conduct pre-trip inspections to ensure that the brakes, tires, and engine are in working
order. The garage will be used to service only those trucks scheduled to depart fi.om the Road Runner site. The
petitioner estimates that a total of 7 to 15 trucks will leave the facility on a daily basis. The garage hours will be 7
a.m. to 10 p.m.
Parking:
The 1,826 square foot office building and 1,826 square foot warehouse required a total of 9 parking spaces, one of
which is handicap accessible. The petitioner has provided the required parking spaces and does not propose to
add parking. The garage will only service vehicles scheduled to arrive/depart fi.om the facility and there is
sufficient parking for the trucks.
Open Space:
Additional screening around the proposed garage is not required because the structure will be located in the rear
portion of the property, sethaek approximately 195 feet fi.om the Terminal Drive entrance. As you recall, in the
original Conditional Use application, the petitioner agreed to install landscaping along Terminal Drive to buffer
the site fi.om the adjacent residential use. The petitioner has installed portions of the required lendscaping and
will complete the installation when the proposed garage is complete.
Other Issues
The subject property is located adjacent to a residential area to the south. Therefore, the hours of operation will
continue to be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10!00 p.m. to help minimize noise impacts on the adjacent residentia! area.
Review by Other Village Departments
The Engineering Division and Fire Department have completed preliminary reviews of this proposal and had no
comments at this time. However, submission of final plans meeting all applicable Development Code and Fire
Code requirements is required with the building permit application.
BA-21-2000 Roadrunner Express, Inc. - Amend Co~
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 3
In addition, the Police Department reviewed the petitioner's request and researched accident data for the area. In
the past 5 years, Mount Prospect handled two accidents (non-injury) at the intersection, of Badger Road and
Oakton Street. (Most accidents at this intersection were handled by Des Plaines and the accident data was not
available.) Expanding the scope of the analysis to the Terminal Drive/Busse Road/Oak'ton Street area, there were
20 accidents in the past five years, three involving injuries. Increased truck activity in the Terminal Drive/Busse
Road/Oakton Street area has the potential to impact traffic flow and may require additional safety measures to
minimize traffic accidents.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate
to:
The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, eom/on or
general welfare;
The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or the value o£ other prope~es in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
ca Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets; and
ca Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
The site is located in a predominantly iadus~al area. The proposed amended Conditional Use wouid have
limited negative impacts on the adjacent area. The proposed cartage facility and new garage will continue to be ia
compliance will the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements, except where existing non-
conformities will be maintained or reduced.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Conditional
Uses in Section 14.203. Therefore, Staff recommends approval o£ the proposed Conditional Use with the
following conditions:
1. Meet all Development and Fire Code requirements for the entire site;
2. The petitioner shall enter into a covenant agreeing to pay their fair share o£ the cost to install a Waffle signal
at the intersection of Badger Road and Oakton Street if it is determined necessary in the future.
3. Complete all landscaping improvements prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy for the proposed
garage.
I concur,
Wdham Cooney, Jr, AICP
Director of Community Development
[LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
I00 S. Emerso~ Street
Mount Pms~, Illinoi~ 600~6
Phone 8~7.818.S328
FAX 847.B18,5~29
Application for Conditional Use Approval
Ad~s~es) (~ Nmb~, S~) ....
2400 ~e~na1
Site ~ (Acres) f ~op~y Zoning To~l Bui~g Sq. FC (Si~)I ......
2.3 .... I-1 [2 - 1,825.~1 s.f. one-s~o~ bu~ld~gs
Setback:
Fmnt ......... Rear Side '~ide
(east)
9.96 ft. (~est)~s~.' 180
~ min. 60 ft. ~n. 120 ft. .
~ Building He~t Lot Coverage (%) Nm~r of P~king Spaces
~ Adj~ent L~d U~s:
~ ~0~ [ South I~ West ....
petrole~ tan~ ~ tollwa~~pe,trole~ tan~ , , tollway
~ T~ I,D. ~umber or County ~i~cd P~ Numar(s)
~ 08-23-300~53~000
~ ,,
~ ~al ~ripfion (a~ addition~ shc~ if
Please see attached.
~0 ~ggie Fil!~nn (847) 910~511
~~ C6~om~dn : Telephone (ev~g)
~ ~ Road~e~ ~press, Inc.
~ P.O. Box 7295 (867) 91-8511
~ag~r
Rose~ont' ' IL 60018
Name ' Tct~hone (day)
SAME AS APPLICANT
~ Corpomion Telephone
O
i street ~.'ddress .... FaX:
' City '"'~tatc "~ip Co~e Pager ......
Developer ...... -
Name N/A Telephone (day)
Addte~ .___ Fax
Attort~ey
Name Thomas R. Burney/Patrick T. Bran~ Telephone (day) _ (312) 332-0200
Addre~ Schaim, Burmey, Ross & Citron, Ltd. Fax (312) 332-4514
222 N. LaSalle St., Suite 1910
Surveyor
btarae Certified, Survey,,,Co. Telcphon¢(4ay) __(..773) 775-775~
~ Address ..5?40 H. Elston Av_,e. .. Fax
(773)
775-~2855
t~ N~e N/A Telephone (day)
..... ...
Architect
Name N/A Te!ephoa¢ (d~y):......
^dd~ess ........ Fax .....
~ame N(A Tcl~h~e (~y): ....
Ad~ F~
South Emcon S~e~, Mo~t Pro~ Illinois Fax ~7.81~329
2 ~D 8~7.392.6~
Proposed Conditional Use (as ILsted in ~e zontng d~strico
Oarage to. be built on side of existing cartage facility ..
D~ctibe itR Detail thc ~uildihgs and Activitie~ ~ar~p~sed m~d' How th~; Proposed Usc Me'ts the Attached Standacds
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets it' necessary)
pT.~ARR SEE ATTACHED
Hour~ of Opera,on
7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
Address(es) (Stro~ Number,
S~me as -~ting site information - Please see attached
~_ ~ Ske 'Area (Acres) ?roper~ Zoning Tom! B~i]ding Sq. FL (Ske) Sq. Ft. Devoted ~ P~oposcd Use
F~n~ K~ Side Side
~0
~ ~ Numb¢~ of P=k~g
Pl~e uot~ ~at ~e ~pli~tion will not be tek.wed un61 ~is ~iHon h~ ~en ~lly compiled ~d a~ gqu~d pl~
have ~u sati~c~o~ly ~bmi~ed to ~e Piing Division. ~comple~ submi~ ~itt no~ ~ at.ted, It ~ s~gly ~d
~tifi~er ghedule ~ ~poin~em wt~ ~e a~ropriate Vil~ge stuff so ~ ma~dab ~ be ~viewed for accuracy ~d completeness
~ ~e t~e ofsubm~L
to ~b ~es: ~e applier ~ ~e own~ or a~ ~tive of Ce owner of~e pmp~, ~e ~i~o~ ~d
~ g~t ~ploy~ of ~e Village ofM~t Pr~p~ ~d ~oW ~m ~i~ion to ~ter on ~e pro~ dur~g
~r vg~ inaction of ~e subject
1 hereby sff~ ~t~~ided herein ~d in ~t ma~ submiRed in sss~i~oa wRh'~is ~pli~t~on ~e ~e and
acc~te ~
t ~e~by desi~at~ th~'~PllcaU~ to ~ ~ my ~en~ for ~e pu~se of sceki~g ~he V~iatlou(s) describcd in ~h~ ~pptication
asso~tat~ suppo~ng mat~l.
~n~r. Please see attached letter O~t~ ~
M~nt ~os~m De.ineRt of Communi~ Development ' ' Fax ~V.81 S.5329
100 Sou~ Emcon S~eel. MOUnt Pros~t Ulinob ~D ~.392.6~4
3
Affidavit of Ownership
COUNTY OF COOK )
)
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
the sole )
_ anco 4~o~,~.c,~ /~,./ ) owner of the property
ma authorized officer of the )
commonly described as
as of this date.
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to before
me this ~f~ dayof
Mcunl Prospect Dcpa.,-imcat 0f CommunRy Dcvelol~ment Phou~ 847.8 !.8.5128
!OC ~outh Emctson St~'~¢t, Mount Prospect ! llinois Fe~c 847.818, 5329
4 TDD 84?.392.6064
' APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
ROADRUNNER EXPRESS, INC.
SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED
The Petitioner is presently operating its business on the site pursuant to the conditional use
approved by the Village Board in case 213A-20-99. Petitioner seeks to expand the conditional use
by the construction of a steel garage on the property to safety check its vehicles.
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be
detrimental to, or endanger the publ/c health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare.
The conditional use for the operation has already been approved. The
construction of the garage and will not alter the use but will rather allow
for necessary safety checks to be performed in the garage. Accordingly,
there will be no adverse impact on the public health, safety, morals,
comfort or general welfare.
2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish
and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located.
The surrounding uses and the existing approved operation are such that
the construction of the garage Will not be injurious to these surrounding
uses nor substantially diminish and impair property values in the area.
3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and
orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the
dist:rict.
The cartage and express facility is an approved conditional use. The
surrounding uses are industrial in nature and the proposed garage will
not impede the normal and orderly development of the surrounding
property. The proposed use is in conformance with the existing
developments in the area and will continue to complement those existing
uses.
4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities.
have been or will be provided.
The existing public utilities, access roads, and drainage will be utilized by
the Petitioner and will be adequate to serve its needs.
5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so
designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets.
As stated above, this is an industrial area. The site is served by Terminal
Drive. Currently, the site is utilized for an approved cartage fadlity. The
proposed use will not detrimentally impact traffic congestion in the area
as it will not increase traffic for the already permitted use.
6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current
Comprehensive Plan for the Village.
The current Comprehensive Plan calls this area out for industrial uses.
The proposed garage is not contrary to the objectives of the current
Comprehensive Plan,
7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable
regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be
modified pursuant to the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The proposed garage will conform with all setback requirements.
2
Site Plan
ORDINANCE NO, 5039
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING a CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
. Passed and approved by
the President and Board of Trustees
the 17th day of August, 1999
Published in pamphlet form by
authority of the corporate
authorities of the Village of
Mount Prospec[, Illinois, the
18th day of August, 1999
VWL
8/7/99
8110/99
ORDINANCE NO; ,~OR9
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
WHEREAS, Maggie FillmanJRoadrunner Express, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed a petition for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 2400 Terminal Ddve.
(hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
That part of the SW¼ of Section 23, Township 41 N, Range 11 E of the Third Principal
Meridian described as: commencing at the SE comer of the said SW¼ of Section 23;
thence north on the north-south ¼ section line 670.7'; thence west on a line parallel with
the south line of said SW¼, 1,651.65' to the point of beginning; thence continuing west on
a line parallel to the south line of said SW¼, 275'; thence north along a line forming an
angle of 90° 01' 40", measured counterclockwise from the last described course 60';
thence west on a line parallel to the south line of said SW¼, 63.82'; thence north along a
line parallel to the nodh-south ¼ section line 300.04'; thence east on a line parallel to the
south line of said SW¼, 333.7'; thence south along a line forming an angle of 90° 01' 40",
measured clockwise from the last described course, 360' to the point of beginning, except
the south 60' of the east 275' thereof (known as Terminal Drive) in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to construct a cartage facility with accessory
office and warehousing uses; and
WHEREAS, a Public Headng was.held on the request for CondiQonal Use being the subject of ZBA
Case No. 20-99 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 22"~
day of July, 1999, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect
Journal & Tooics on the 7t~ day of July, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the
President and Board of Trustees tn support of the request being the subject of ZBA 20-99; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount. Prospect have given
consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the
Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be in the best interest of the
Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
~ The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
~ The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
grant a Conditional Use, as provided in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the
conslruc~on of a cartage facility with accessory office and warehousing uses, as shown on the Site
Plan, a copy of which Is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit
ZBA 20-99
Page 2/2
~[~d~J~[[:~; That pdor to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use,
the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled:
1. Pdor to issuance of a building permit, the Petitioner shall submit a landscape plan for the
site including, at a minimum, the landscape areas and materials shown in Exhibit "B";
2. Pdor to issuance of a building permit, the Petitioner shali submit a paving striping plan to
provide a minimum of nine (9) total parking spaces, including at least one handicapped
accessible, to the property, in general conformance with Exhibit
3. Remove the existing concrete base, previously used for oil tanks;
4. Provide a concrete dumpster pad and dumpster enclosure to the site;
5. Petitioner Mil comply with requirements by Village staff for improving the exterior
appearance of the existing structures;
6. Hours of operation for thb use shatl be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
~ That the VilIage Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified
copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cc~k County.
~ This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES: Corcoran, Eoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowro~, Wilk$
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Nocch±
PASSED and APPROVED this 17th day of August .. ,1999.
KAD
7119/00
7/28/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
WHEREAS, Maggie Fillman/Roadrunner Express, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed
a petition for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 2400 Terminal Ddve, (hereinafter
referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
That part of the SW¼ of Section 23, Township 41 N, Range 11 E of the Third Principal
Meridian described as: commencing at the SE corner of the said SW¼ of Section 23;
thence north on the north-south ¼ section line 670.7'; thence west on a line parallel with
the south line of said SW¼, 1,651.65' to the point of beginning; thence continuing west on
a line parallel to the south line of said SW¼, 275'; thence north along a line forming an
angle of 90° 01' 40", measured counterclockwise from the last described course 60';
thence west on a line parallel to the south line of said SW¼, 63.82'; thence north along a
line parallel to the north-south ¼ section line 300.04'; thence east on a line parallel to the
south line of said SW¼, 333.7'; thence south along a line forming an angle of 90° 01' 40",
measured clockwise from the last described course, 360' to the point of beginning, except
the south 60' of the east 275' thereof (known as Terminal Drive) in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks to modify a previously permitted Conditional Use (ord. 5039) to
construct a maintenance garage at the existing cartage facility; and
WHEREAS, a Public Headng was held on the request for modified Conditional Use being the subject
of ZBA Case No. 21-00 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the
22nd day of June, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect
Daily Herald on the 7th day of June, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations of
approval to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA
21-00; and
WHEREAS, this property is the subject to a previous Conditional Use granted by Ordinance 5039
for the operation of a cartage facility; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given
consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the
Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use modification would be in the best
interest of the Village.
NOW;'THEREFORE,' BE IT ORDAINED'BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
grant a modification to the existing Conditional Use, as provided in Section 14.203.F.13 of the Village
Code, to allow the construction of a maintenance garage at the existing cartage facility, as shown
on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
ZBA 21-2000
Page 2/2
SECTION THREE: That prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use,
the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled:
1. Meet all Development and Fire Code requirements for the entire site;
2. The petitioner shall enter into a covenant agreeing to pay their fair share of the cost to install
a traffic signal at the intersection of Badger Road and Oakton Street if it determined
necessary in the future.
3. Complete all landscaping improvements pdor to obtaining a certificate of occupancy for the
proposed garage.
4. Applicant must comply with all conditions in Ordinance 5039.
SECTION FOUR: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a cedified copy
of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clefk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL SANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNI'I Y DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-2000 - 1104 CHURCH STREET
VARIATION TO PERMIT A POOL AND DECK TO ENCROACH INTO A REQUIRED REAR
SETBACK AND INTO A REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK
KATHY AND ROBERT GRIPPO - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-16~2000, a request to construct
an in-ground swimming pool eight feet into the required 15 foot rear setback and three feet into the required 20 foot
exterior side yard setbackl The subject parcel is a 10,106 square foot rectangular and relatively level parcel that is out
of any flood zone. The parcel is developed with a single family home and a detached garage.
The applicant appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals at the May 26, 2000 meeting and requested a variation to
construct a 16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a 4' concrete deck in the rear and exterior yards. The Zoning Board
requested the applicant to revise the proposal to eliminate or greatly reduce the exterior sideyard Variation. Mr.
Grippo appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 22 to present the modified request. The applicant
proposed to locate the pool with a surrounding four-foot wide concrete deck seven feet into the required exterior yard.
The applicant has offered to reduce the width of the deck to three feet in the exterior side yard, which is a permitted
encroachment. Therefore, only the pool would require a variation, as it would be located three feet into the required
20-foot setback and 8~ into the rear yard.
As detailed in the first staff report (attached), no particular condition of the lot makes the proposed encroachment
necessary. In addition, the petitioner could construct a pool without the proposed Variations by shiRing the location of
the pool closer to the house and reducing the width of the surrounding concrete deck to three feet on all sides of the
pool. The applicant has indicated that a smaller pool does not meet their needs and that moving the pool would require
removal of their patio.
ZBA members indicated their appreciation that the petitioner revised the proposal to bring the request more in line
with Village Code requirements. They felt that the proposed fence would screen the pool and limit the visual impact
of the encroachment in the required setbacks. Based on those facts, the ZBA found that the requested Variations met
the Zoning Code Standards for Variations, and voted 4-0 to recommend approval of Case No. ZBA-16-2000.
Wflham J Cooney Jr, AICP
/JC
\\VH~V02~DEP'PCOM DEV~G EN~ LNG~ZBAXZBA 2000~vlEJ Memos~ZBA-16-2000 (grippo residence).doc
MINUTES Ol~
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-16-2000 Hearing Date: June 22, 2000
PETITIONER: Bob & Kathy Grippo
1104 S.'Chu~eh Road ~
PUBLICATION DATE: . ~ June 7, 2000,DAIL~HER.4LD
REQUEST: Variation to permit Ihe constmclion of aswimming~poolthat would encroach
8' into the minimum 15' rear yard setback and7' into the minimum 20' side
exterior yard :setback required by Code;
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Keith ¥oungquist
Arlene Juracek; Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mort'ill Cottan
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMtlERS'PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Conmally, S~nior~Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Bob Grippo
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order:at 7:35. p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Case ZBA-16-2000, a request for a Variation to permit the construction of a
swimming pool that would encroach 8' into the minimum 15'/re~tr yard setback and 7' into the minimum 20' side
exterior yard setback required by Code. Ms. Juracek stated that this case had come before the May 25 meeting but
ZBA me~nbers had found it difficult to support the requested two variations. ,They had'suggested a sl~orter poor With a
narrower deokl set back further from the exterior side yard. ZBA members asked the petitioner to come forward at the
next Zoning Board meeting with un,adjusted request;and the case was tabled m thismeeting.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the amended request for Variations. She stated that. the subject property ?
an existing single-story home on an 84 X 120' lot on a residential street and with a rear setback of approximately 40.
Ms Connolly described the petitioner's proposal to construct a 16' X 32' pool. The revisions show that the pool will
be 13 from the exterior sldeyard,w!lere~code requires'20, and7 from the rear lot hne here the code reqmres 15. The
pool will be surrounded by a 4' concrefe deekin the, rear:ya~d~ She pointed out that the actual encroachment into the
sideyard by the pool would be3' with the 4' deck making a 7' encroachment. Staff continues to find that the submittal
does not support a finding of a hardship and, therefore, recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board
denial of tti~ proposed ~ariati0ns .to ip~rmit ~imo! ~0 ~ner~d~h eight(g) feet into the required 15' rear setback and
seTen feet (7)int; the i:equired ~Z0' e~tetior sid~' ~tback fo~;'~he"residence at 1104 ChUrch Street, Case No. ZBA-16-
2000. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
Bob Grippo was sworn in and testified that he had changed his plans and moved the proposed pool 3' to the north. He
stated hi~ contractor told him that was the best he could do Without ripping out the existing patio. He said'this change
puts the poolwithin 3' of the sideyard setback.
Michael Blue responded that a 3' carriage walk is a permitted encroachment in the yard. The applicant is proposing a
4' deck, ii' the deck were reduced to 3', it could be considered a carriage walk and that would be a permitted
encroachment. Mr. Blue said the 3' of the deck itself could be in the yard.
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA- 16-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson "' ' :
Page 2
Mr. Grippo said the 4' deck could be cut down to 3' on the south side of the pool. He said that would put the pool
within 3' of the 20' setback. He said he would put of a 5' privacy fence and would not need to rip out the patio and not
be too close to the back door of his house. Mr. GriPPo Said that~h~' did~ not want to reduce the size .of the poc~l afl,-
more, as it will be a small size, just 17,000 gallons.
Arlene Juracek said she was heartened to hear that Mr. Grippo was willing to reduce the deck to 3'. She said it makes
the requested variation less egregious. She reminded the petitioner that, at the last meeting, the Board had not been
concerned about the encroachment into the rear'setback'butthe sideyard is ~really on the street and that th~ Board Was
concerned with how that would work. By shortening the deck to 3' on that end, it can be considered as just a 3'
encroachment on the s ideyard, wl~ietr would be a significant improvement,
Mr. Grippo said that there would be no divingb0ard, and that the pool would be just 6' at the deep end. He asked if
any Board members had seen the pool at 1026 Church, which is similar to what he plans to do with his area. He also
said that the pool has been there for 13 years, is 6' from sidewalk, and that there have been no complaints.
Leo Floros said he had gone to see the neighbor's prope ~rty and could barely see the pool. Mr. Floros asked Mr. Grippo
if his neighbors objected to the plan. Mr. Grippo said no, they wanted him to: put in the pool.
Ms. Juracek said the neighbors had two opportunities to voice any objection, as this was the second hearing of the
casc.
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval of'Case ZBA-1.6~2000, a Variation to permit, the construction of.a
swimming pool that would encroach 8' into the minitnum 15' rear yard setback and 3' into the minimum 20' side
exterior yard setback, with the condition that petitioner reduce the width of the deck along the sideyard from 4' to 3'.
Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Luxem;,Youngquist. and Juracek
NAYS:None
Motion was approved 4-0..Village:Board's deoision is final in Chis case.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Y0ungquist. The motion was,approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Developmen! Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECI' ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-2000 - 1104 CHURCH STREET
VARIATIONS TO PERMIT A POOL AND DECK TO ENCROACH EIGHT FEET INTO A
REQUIRED REAR SETBACK AND TEN FEET INTO A REQUIRED EXTERIOR SI~E FRONT
SETBACK
The applicant appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals at the May 26, 2000 meeting and requested a variation to
construct a 16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a 4' concrete deck in the rear and exterior yards. The applicant revised the
request and proposes to locate the pool with surrounding 4' concrete deck seven (7) feet into the required exterior yard
and eight (8) feet into the rear yard.
As detailed in the first staff report (attached), no particular condition of the lot makes the proposed encroachment
necessary. In addition, the petitioner could conslruct a pool without the proposed Variations by shifting the location of
the pool closer to the house and reducing the width of the surrounding concrete deck to 3'.
RECOM~[ENDATION
Although the proposed Variation may not have a negative effect on neighborhood character, the subrrdttal does not
support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board .denial of the proposed
Variations to permit a pool to encroach eight (8) feet into the required 15' rear setback and seven feet (7) into the
required 20' exterior side setback for the residence at 1104 Church Street, Case No. ZBA-16-2000. The Village
Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
Willi~~, AI~,~' [ctor of Community Development
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community DevelOl a ent
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNE~
DATE: MAY 19, 2000
FIEARING DATE: MAY 25, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-2000 - 1104 CHURCH STREET
VARIATIONS TO PERMIT A POOL AND DECK TO ENCROACH EIGHT FEET INTO A
REQUIRED REAR SETBACK AND TEN FEET 131TO A REQUIRED EXI'ERIOR SIDE
FRONT SETBACK
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Kathy and Robert Grippo
1104 Church Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owners of the Property
Parcel Number: 08-14-317-008
Lot Size: 10,106 square feet
Existing Zoning: R1 Single Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage: 31% existing
42% proposed
45% maximum per R1 district
Requested Action: Proposal for a Variation to allow a pool and deck to encroach 10 feet into the required 20' exterior side
setback and eight feet into the required 15' rear setback, i
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property is an existing single-story home located on an 84'2 5/8" X 120' (10,106 square feet) single-
family lot on a residential street. The existing house has a rear setback of approximately 40'.
The petitioner is seeking to construct a 16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a 4' concrete decl~ in the rear yard. The
applicant chose the proposed pool'location to locate it away from the rear door of the house and the existing patio. The
proposed location o f the pool and deck would encroach by 10 feet into the 20' minimum exterior side yard setback and
by eight feet into the 15' minimum rear yard setback required by the R1 district.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of sur~'ey and site plan and
visited the site.
ount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Meeting o~'May 25.2(X)O
Z[3A- 16-2000 Page 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards
Required findings for all Variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. These
standards relate to:
rn A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently
hav/ng an interest in the property;
(2 lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
c~ protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The subject parcel is a 10,106 square foot rectangular and relatively level parcel that is out of any flood zone. The
pamel is developed with a single family home and a detached garage. The applicant proposes to construct a pool and
deck that would encroach significantly into the required rear and exterior side setbacks.
The reasons for the proposed Variation are for the convenience of the petitioner, rather than financial. The applicant
proposes the encroachments to provide for the largest possible patio area and to keep the proposed pool away from the
rear door of the house. The proposed addition would not be likely to have a negative effect on the character of the
existing single-family residential area or the public welfare,
Notwithstanding the above, no particular condition of the lot, makes the proposed encroachment necessary. The
petitioner could construct a pool in the rear yard without the proposed Variations. The proposed pool encroaches by
six feet into the exterior side setback and the deck by four additional feet. By moving the pool six feet to the north and
reducing the width of the deck to three feet at the south end of the pool (sidewalks up to 3' in width may encroach into
setbacks), the proposed pool and deck would meet the exterior side yard setback requirement. Similarly, the pool
could be moved closer to the house and the width of the deck reduced to meet the required 15' rear yard setback.
Neither of those changes would require reducing the size of the proposed pool. By the above standards, no hardship
that would justify the proposed Variations exists.
RECOMMENDATION
Although the proposed Variation may not have a negative effect on neighborhood character, the subm/ttal does not
support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board denial of the proposed
Variations to permit a pool to encroach eight feet (8') into the required 15' rear setback and ten feet (10') into the
required 20' exterior side setback for the residence at 1104 Church Street. Case No. ZBA-16-2000. The Village
Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
Wi~lli~m J.~ ooney~, C~P, Director of Community Development
/.IF
\\VIqW02\D E PT~CO M D EXAG EN~P LNGkZB AXZBA 2000XStaff MemoskZBA- [ 6-2000 Memo (Grippo),dec
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-16z2000 -Hearing Date: May 25, 2000
PETITIONER: Bob & Kathy'Grippo
1 I'04 S. Church Road
PUBLICATION DATE: MayS,'2000 DAIL~HEPMLD~
REQUEST: Variati°n to permit the construction of a swimming pool that w0fild encroach
8' iht6 th~ niihimuTM 1 ~' rear vi ltd setback andq 0' into ihe minimum 20' side
exterior yard setback required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chaxrperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael:Blue, Deputy Director of Community DevelOpment
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Bob, Kathy &,Kim Grippo
-Nick &- L~rralge :oiakou~uis
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases, ZBA~,0g-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the APril 27 meeting. ,,ould be p0st~oned inddfihiteiv. At 7:40, after hearing another case, Ms. Juracek introduced
Case ZBA-16-2000, a request fbr a Variation to peru;it the ~0nStruetion of a swimming pool that would encroach 8'
into the minimum 15' rear yard se;back and 10' into the minimum 20' side exterior yard setback required by Code.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided through the newspaper, mailing and
signs on the property. He indicated that the subject property is an existin~ single-story home on an 84' X 120' ot on a
residential street anii with a rear setback of approximately 40'. He described the petitioner's proposal to constr~ct a
16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a 4' concrete deck inthe rear yard. He stated that the proposed location of the pool and
deck would encroach 10' into the 20' exterior side setback and eight feet into the 15' rear setback required by the RI
district.
Mr. Perkins outlined the petitioner's reasons for the proposed Variation. He stated that the petitioner's motivation for
the request is to retain most 0ftheir existing patio an~t to keep the proposed pool away from ~e rear door of the house.
He stated that, although the proposed pool Would not be likety to have a negative effect on the neighborhood or public
welfare, no particular cond}tir~n of the lot makes the' proposed encroachment necessary. He described how the
petitioner could construct a pool in the rear yard without th~ proposed Variations and adried that, fOr that reason; no
hardship exists.
Based on the lack of a hardship, Mr. Perkins gave Staff's recommendation of denial of the proposed Variations and
added that the Village Board's ~lecision is final ~o~ this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-16-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Bob Grippo was sworn in and testified thaf'hb had lived m his home for seventeen years and explained what he wanted
to do concerning installing an in ground pool in his yard. He pointed out a similar situation at 106 Church Road.
where a Variation was granted several years ago. He said none of his neighbors objected to his plan.
Nick Diakoumis, 1103 S. Church Rd., was sworn in, stat,e.d Mr. Grippo maintains his property impeccably, and his
proposed request would add value to the neighborhood and M~uht Prospect if granted.
ZBA members indicated they found it difficult to supp0[t two rather significant variations. They had several
suggestions for the proposal, particularly that it should be set back further from the exterior side yard. A shorter pool
with a narrower deck was a. lso sugg~sted, j ZBA member~e,cl the petitioner to discuss the recommended revisions to
hisplans with staff and ~6me forv~ard at the n~ Zoning B'o~d meeting with an adjusted request
Richard Rogers made a motion to table Case ZBA-16:2000, to allow the petitioner time to consider alternative plans.
Elizabeth Luxem seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Case No. ZBA-16-2000 will be tabled to the June 22,2000 meeting.
At 9:20 p,m., after hearing three more cases, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers.
The motion was approved by avoice vote and the me~tingwas adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Plfi.nning Secretary
Michaei'Blu~e - ~.
Commun!ty Development Deputy Director
Beechwood Drive
~ ~ ~ Grace Drive
C~ressD~v~ I .... ~___~ ....
~l ~ ~ ~-' ~ressDdve~
i ~ ~ Lancaster Avenue
Road ~
~hnreh Road
~ ~a-Wa-Ta Avenu
Linneman Road
. Robert and Kathleen Grippo
1104 South Church Road
Mt. Prospect, Il, 60056
June 8, 2000
Village Board Members,
This is a new proposal we are submitting as a result of the May 25th
meeting. We are moving the entire deck and pool three feet north. Because
of this, the cement deck will start at thirteen feet, and the pool will start at
seventeen feet from the sidewalk. Our pool contractor suggested, at this
distance we could keep the same size pool and would not have to replace the
cement patio. We would also like to suggest to the board members to take a
look at the Pat Biedar residence, at 1026 Church, before the June 22nd
meeting. The pool has been there for over 15 years, and has caused no
problem~, to the neighbors or the neighborhood. We also think that by add~&q
~a pool will only help to increase the property values of the neighborhood.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
CQMMONLY KNOWN AS 1104 SOUTH CHURCH ROAD
WHEREAS, Bob and Kathy Grippo (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application
for a Variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 1104 S. Church Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally
described as:
Lot 42, Windsor Estates, being a subdivision of the W ¼ of Section 14, Township
41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation from Sections 14.905.B.1 of the Zoning Code to allow
the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, with an encroachment of three feet (3') into the
required twenty foot (20') exterior side yard setback, and eight feet (8') into the required fifteen foot
(15') rear yard setback; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the Variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case
No. ZBA 16-00 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25t~ day
of May, 2000, and the 22~ day of June, 2000, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 9"~ day of May, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and positive recommendations
to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 16-00;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have considered the request herein
and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said Variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE tT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
~ The President and Board of Trustees cf the Village of Mount Prospect hereby
grant to the Subject Properly a variation'from Section 14.905.B1 to allow the construction of an in-
ground swimming pool, with an encroachment of three feet (3') into the required twenty foot (20')
exterior side yard setback, and eight feet (8') into the required fifteen foot (15') rear yard setback.
Page 2/2
ZBA 16-2000
1104 S. Church Road
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect and after its passage, approval
and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\G EN\f~les\WlN~O RDINAN C\Vadation 1104 S Church Rd, pool encroachment,dOC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT pROsPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ,,~. ~.~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,~]~]~1~
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-08-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO PERMIT OUTSIDE DINING IN THE~ 3, B4, AND
B5 ZONING DISTRICTS.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-08-2000, a text amendment to permit
outdoor dining areas in the B3, B4, and B5 districts.
A review of the Zoning Code related to downtown and other developments revealed that the commercial districts of
the Zoning Code do not include outdoor dining areas as a permitted use. Section 14.301 specifies that uses not listed
as "Permitted," "Conditional," or "Permitted Under Limited Circumstances" in a particular Zoning District are
prohibited in that district. Tlf~s provision would, technically, prohibit Outdoor Dining in the Central Business District
and elsewhere. Outdoor dining fosters the sort of activity and interaction encouraged by the T~ District Strategic Plan
and would be a desirable addition to the downtown. It should be noted that, if alcoholic beverages were to be served,
provisions of the Village Alcohol Code would still regulate outdoor dining areas in any of the affected zoning districts.
In addition, the amendment has specific provisions to limit possible impacts on residential areas. The proposed
changes are described in the attached ZBA staff memo.
The ZBA briefly discussed the proposed Amendments in terms of the Zoning Code Standards for Text Amendments and
voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Amendments, Case No. ZBA-08-2000.
/JC
MINUTES
CASE NO. ZBA-08-2000 Hearing Da~e: June 22, 2000 ~ .
PETITIONER: ~illage of MOUnt Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7, 2000 and April 10, 2000 DAI£YHER~£D
REQUEST: Text Amendments to the Zoning Code Secti0n 14. t7.02 and 14,311
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Ftoros
' EliZabeth Luxem
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Jaracek, Chairperson
lVlEMBERS ABSENT: :Merrill Cottea
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael.Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
' Judy C6nnolly~ Senior Pl~er
INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. At 8:05, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-08-2000, a request for Text Amendments
to the Zoning Code Section 14.1702 and 14.311
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the ease, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper. Ms.
Connolly said that in conjunction with the downtown redevelopment, staff has been reviewing that part of the Village
Code dealing With outside dining. The way the Code is written, outdoor dining is technically prohibited. Therefore,
staff has undertaken a text amendment to write this into the Code, as it would be a desirable addition to the district.
She pointed out that several restaurants now offer outside dining in the B-3 zoning district. They have not been a
nmsance to surrounding neighborhoods, With the amendment, a plan would need to be submitted with the location of
the tables, distance from property line, hours 0f operation, and garbage pick-up consistent with our Code. The
furniture will need to be r~moved when not in Use. permission could be revoked with a 14 day notice. The permit
would be good for one year. Outdoor dining would be a positive attribute in the downtown and other B-3 areas. Staff
recommends approval of the Text Amendment.
Ms; Juracek.said that downtown Chicago outdoor cafes have shrubbery, greens, etc., to define the dining area. She
noted provisions for such definition are not included in this ordinance and asked if the landscape ordinance take care of
those needs.
Ms. Connolly answered that ifa physical barrier is needed it would be recommended on a.case by case basis when the
plan'is submitted.
Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development, said that the idea was not to put an extra onus on the
restaurant owner. If there is need to require barriers, it would be required atthe time of the permit.
Keith, Youngquist said he is heavily involved with the Chicago ear6 'ordinance reqifirements, which are often too
burdensome. He said he expected the owners would work'with the Village if they want to offer this service.
Ms. Juracek. ~aid we definitely need to attract people.to the downtown area.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-08-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval for a Text Amendment to Sections I4.1702 and 14 311 of the
Zoning Code. Elizabeth Luxem seconded the m0ti0h. '
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Fl0ros, Li:ixern, ~Youngquist, and Juracek
'NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4-~0. :Village Board's'd~cision ~s fina~ ih thi§ ease.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by'K~ith Youngquist. The m6tio~. ~va~ fippr6~,ed by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbar-; Swi~it~k, Planning Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNEP~
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-08-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO MODIFY REGLrLATIONS FOR
OUTSIDE DINING AREAS IN THE B3, B4, AND B5 DISTRICTS.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, 1L 60056
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
A. Modify Section 14.1702 B3 Zoning District Permitted Uses
Modfy:
54. Restaurants, including entertainment_ami dancing, and outside dining areas subiect to the requirements of
Section 14.311.B.
Add Section 14.311.B, as follows:
B. Outside dining areas shall be permitted on the same zoning lot as an established restaurant in the B-3, B-4,
or B-5 District, subject to the following requirements:
1. An application for the outside dining area must be submitted to the Department of Community
Development. The Department will conduct an administrative review of the application and the
Director will either approve or disapprove the application within 30 days from receipt. The application
shall contain, at a m/mmum, the following information:
a. A plot plan showing location of the outside dining area;
b. Distances to all property lines;
c. Proposed hours of operation;
d. The clear width of all walkways and sidewalks adjacent to the outside dining area;
e. Photographs or other documentation showing the construction and appearance of all furniture to be
used in the outside dining area, including materials, colors, and wind pressure information;
f. Prov/sions for refuse disposal for the outside dining area;
2. Approved permits for outside dining areas shall be effective for a period of one.year from the date of
approval.
3. Permits will be subject to an annual review and may be revoked by the Village at any time on fourteen
(14) days notice.
ZBA 08-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
4. All outdoor furnishings shall be constructed in such a manner to allow for their easy removal during
winter months and/or if required by the village.
5. All outdoor furniture and appurtenances shall be designed to withstand a wind pressure of no less than
30 pounds per square inch minimum.
6. Colors and materials of outdoor fumiture and other appurtenances shall be selected to be harmonious
with the principal structure and adjacent structures. Outdoor furniture and other appurtenances should
be constructed of durable materials, such as wrought iron. Use of lightweight materials, such as tubular
aluminum or plastic is discouraged.
7. The sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in the outside dining areas shall be subject to all
requirements of Chapter 11 of the Mount Prospect Village Code.
8. The proprietor shall provide adequate facilities for refuse disposal, as determined by the Environmental
Health Division.
9. The outdoor dining area shall not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of nearby residents of
persons working or shopping in the vicinity.
10. Outside dining areas shall be exempt from applicable parking requirements.
11. Advertising or promotional features in a permitted outside dining area shall be limited to umbrellas or
canopies, and shall be limited to no more than 15% of the surface area ora canopy or umbrella.
12. Outside dining areas shall meet all applicable Village and State Health Requirements.
ANALYSIS
The Community Development Department is currently reviewing plans for Downtown Redevelopment Phase
153. A part of this proposal is an outdoor dining area associated with a restaurant space in the building. A
review of the Zoning Code revealed that the commercial districts of the Zoning Code do not include outdoor
dining areas as a permitted use. Section 14.301 specifies that uses not listed as "Permitted," "Conditional," or
"Permitted Under Limited Circumstances" in a particular Zoning District are prohibited in that district. This
provision would, technically, prohibit Outdoor Dining in the Central Business District. As the sort of activity
and interaction fostered by outdoor dining is encouraged by the TIF District Strategic Plan, the use would be a
desirable addition to the district. That has prompted staff to propose this amendment.
Community Development staff has also encountered several existing outside dining areas on B3 Zoned parcels
in the Village. As those areas have benefited the businesses and not been nuisances to surrounding
neighborhoods, staff has included the B3 disWict in the proposed change. The proposed change would also
affect the B4 and B5 Districts, which list as Permitted Uses all uses permitted in the B3 District. Among the
existing outdoor dining areas inthe Village are Riva Bella, Viva Zapata, and Photos (Brentwood Square), E1
Sombrero (Countryside Court), and East Side Mario's (Randhurst).
Outdoor dining areas in any of the affected zoning districts would still be regulated by provisions of the Village
Alcohol Code if alcoholic beverages were to be served. The requirements of the Code would prohibit sewing
alcoholic beverages in an outside dining area within 300' of a residential property line. This would help to limit
possible impacts on residential areas.
STANDARDS FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS
Section 14.203.D.8.b lists standards for the Board to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code. The
standards relate to:
the general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel:
consistency of the amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan;
the degree to which the amendment would create non-conformity;
the degree to which the amendment would make the Zoning Code more permissive; and
consistency of the amendment with Village polioy as established by previous rulings.
BA 08-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 3
The proposed amendments are applicable to all parcels in the affected Zoning Districts and do not affect a
particular parcel. The amendments to the B3 District (and the resulting changes to the B4 and B5 dislricts) will
not create any new non-conformity, as the proposed amendment adds a new Permitted Use. The changes will
make the code slightly more permissive, and will reflect actual practice throughout the Village. The
amendments would permit existing and future restaurants to add a new service to their customers. Existing
liquor laws will help to ensure that the changes do not impact residential areas. Thus the proposed amendments
are consistent with provisions of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Text
Amendments in Section 14.203.D.8.b. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed Text
Amendment.
I Concur,
William J. (~oon~y, Jr., AtlCP
Director of Community Development
H:\GEN~LNGXZBA~BA 2000kStaff Memos~ZBA-08-2000(Text Amendment-II).doc
VWL
7/25/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING)
OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 14.311 entitled "OUTDOOR SALES AND STORAGE" of Chapter 14
of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the following new
subsection 14.311.B, so that hereafter said Section 14.311.B shall be and read as follows:
B. Outside dining areas shall be permitted on the same zoning lot as an established restaurant in
the B-3, B-4, or B-5 District, subject to the following requirements:
1. An application for the outside dining area must be submitted to the Department of
Community Development. The Department will conduct an administrative review of the
application and the Director will either approve or disapprove the application within 30 days
from receipt. The application shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
a. A plot plan showing location of the outside dining area;
b. Distances to all property lines;
c. Proposed hours of operation;
d. The clear width of all walkways and sidewalks adjacent to the outside dining area;
e. Photographs or other documentation showing the construction and appearance of
all furniture to be used in the outside dining area, including materials, colors, and
wind pressure information;
f. Provisions for refuse disposal for the outside dining area;
2. Approved permits for outside dining areas shall be effective for a period of one-year from
the date of approval.
3. Permits will be subject to an annual review and may be revoked by the Village at any time
on fourteen (14) days notice if the outdoor dining area is determined to be creating a
nuisance to surrounding properties.
4. All outdoor furnishings shall be constructed in such a manner to allow for their easy removal
during winter months and/or if required by the village.
5. All outdoor furniture and appurtenances shall be designed to withstand a wind pressure of
no less than 30 pounds per square inch minimum.
6. Colors and materials of outdoor furniture and other appurtenances shall be selected to be
harmonious with the principal structure and adjacent structures. Outdoor furniture and
other appurtenances should be constructed of durable materials, such as wrought iron.
Use of lightweight materials, such as tubular aluminum or plastic is discouraged.
7. The sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in the outside dining areas shall be
subject to all requirements of Chapter 11 of the code of Mount Prospect.
Page 2/2
Outdoor dining
8. The proprietor shall provide adequate facilities for refuse disposal, as determined by the
Environmental Health Division.
9. The outdoor dining area shall not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of nearby
residents of persons working or shopping in the vicinity.
10. Outside dining areas shall be exempt from applicable parking requirements. However, if
the outdoor dining area creates an overflow-parking problem onto adjacent public streets,
provisions must be made for off-site parking on nearby non-residential properties.
11. Advertising or promotional features in a permitted outside dining area shall be limited to
umbrellas or canopies, and shall be limited to no more than 15% of the surface area of a
canopy or umbrella.
].2. Outside dining areas shall meet all applicable Village and State Health Requirements.
SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
C:\TMP~Ch 14 Outdoor dining areas.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-13~2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR
PROVISIONS FOR PARKING LOT LIGHTING.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-13-2000, a text amendment that
establishes standards for parking lot lighting.
Community Development staff reviewed the Village's current lighting requirements. Current provisions regarding
parking lot lighting require that lights not glare onto adjacent properties so as to cause a nuisance and that businesses
extinguish their parking lot lights from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Staff reviewed lighting requirements used in nearby
communities, lighting ordinances from other municipalities provided by the American Planning Association, and
model ordinanees provided by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (I.E.S.) and other professional
organizations. The attached staff memo describes the specific changes and requirements that will allow the Village to
prevent complaints about cornmereial lighting but still provide adequate security using lights for businesses. The
proposed requirements would apply only when new parking lots are built, existing lo~sl are expanded, or new lighting is
added to parking lots. The changes would not make the code more permissive and protects residents from light
trespass, provides for security of users ofparldng lots, and maintains the Village's aesthetics.
The ZBA briefly discussed the proposed Amendments in terms of the Zoning Code Standards for Text Amendments and
voted 443 to recommend approval of the proposed Amendments, Case No. ZBA-13-2000.
~V~iam J. Cooney Jr., AICP
/JC
\\VHW02~DEFDCOM DEV~GENkP LNG~BAkZBA 2000~ViEJ Mera~ZBA-I 3-2000 (light standards - text amendment).doc
OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT
CASE NO. ZBA-13-2000 Hearing Date: June 22, 2000
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7 and April 10, 2000 DAI£YHERA£D
REQUEST: Text Amemh'nent to Zoning Code Section 14.2219 to provide mimmum
standards tbr parking Icl lighting
MEMBERS P~SE~: ~o Floros
~ Eti~be~ Luxem
Arlen~ Surac~, Chai~erson
~E~ ~SENT: Me~ill Co~en
Rieh~d Rogers
ST~F b~ERS P~SENT: Michael Blue, Depu~ Director of CommuniW Development
Judy Connolly, Senior Pl~ner
~TE~STED P~T~S: None
Chaiwe~on Arlene Juracek c~led the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
appr0~ed. At 8:10, a~er he~ng ~o c~es under New Business and ~other c~e under Old Business, Ms. Jura~k
in~odueed C~e ZBA-13-2000. a T~t Amendment to Zoning Code Section 14.2219 to provide minimum stand,ds
for p~king lot lighting
Judy Co~olly, Senior Planer, in=oduced the Case, stating ~at notice had been provided in ~e newspaper. She stated
· at Village Code cu~emly provides ~o guidelines for p~king lot lighting: ali the lighting must be kept on the
prope~ ~d ca~ot "spill" onto su~ounding prope~ies~ ~d p~king lot li~ts must be mined off be~een ~e hours of
l'Ipm and 7~. ~e Police Dep~eat eXPressed c0neems wi~ the existing provisions, as the lighting can provide
seeuriW during ~e night. At ~e request of the Village Bo~d, s~ff unde~ook a review of ~e Village's cu~em lighting
requiremen~ ~d now proposes this Text ~endment, which is bas~ on o~er communities' ordin~ees, ~e lighting
s~d~ ~d model ~n~s of ~e Illuminating Enginee~ Soeie~ of ~eriea (lES) and o~er professional
org~i~tions. ~is proposed m~dment would put ~e Village into a proaetiv~ si~ation where new applicants
proposing a p~king lot would need to p~sent a lighting plan, ~e glare ~d ~e lm~aires of~e proposed fix~res, and
~e f~t e~dles o~ the proposed fmt~es to e~sure ~ eompli~. If ~6~ is a complaint from a neighbor o~ ~
in~nsisteney wi~ ~e code, ~e Village can use a light meter to cheek for compliance. The Text Amendment is
intend~ to protect residen~ agaNSt li~t ~esp~s, provide for securiW of p~king lot users, and profit Village
a~s~e~es. S~r~mmen~ approval of~e Text Amen~em.
~lene J~a~k ~int~ out ~at removal of ~e. requirement ~at p~king lot li~t~g be ~m~ off ~oml lpm ta 7~
did 'not m~date ~at ~e 0~-must leaw ~e li~hts °n d~' ufing ~ose h0u~. She said ~ese st~d~ds were a good
~cem~nt to~e C~e.
El~be~ Lu~m made a motion to red--end approva[to allow Text ~en~ent to ~n~g Code S~ion 14.2219.
'Kei~ Yo~gqui~ s~nd~ ~e mo~ion.
~ON KOLL C~L: A~S: Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, ~d Jmcek
NAYS: None
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- [3-2000
irp '
Arlene Juracek, Cha erson '~ ~' ·: ::' ~ ~
~ , -~ ~ .... , ~ Page 2
Motion was approved 4-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded, by. Kc· th Youngqu st The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. - ~
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER~(....-~
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-t3-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM STANDARDS
FOR PROVISION OF PARKING LOT LIGHTING.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, EL 60056
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Proposed changes to Zoning Code Section 14. 2219
Modify:
Sec. 14.2219. Lighting.
All parking lots with more than four (4} spaces shall provide lighting. Artificial lightin~ used to illuminate any
parkin~ lot shall comply with the regulations as set forth in this Section.
A. General Requirements:
1. Pole height and material:
a. The height of light fixtures shall be limited to the 'district height limit or a maximum of 30',
whichever is less.
b. Light po,les shall bc constructed of metal, or other' material acceptable to the Villa~e Engineer.
Wood poles are prohibited.
2. Glare onto adiacent properties prohibited: Electric lightin~ used to illuminate off-street parking areas
' 6~ driveways shal} be directed away from adiaecnt properties and rights-of-way in such a way as to not
ZBA 13-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
create a nuisance. The following standards shall be enforced to ensure that lighting does not glare onto
adjacent properties.
a. Cutoff luminaires with a total cutoff angle of not more than 90° shall be used in all locations. The
Director of Communit~ Development may approve cutoff angles of greater than 90° or the use of
fixtures without cutoff luminaires upon submission of information conclusively demonstrating that
the proposed lighting will not cause glare on adiacent properties.
b. Light intensity at a property line abutting a residential property shall not exceed 0.1 footcandles.
c. Light intensity at a property line abutting a non-residential property or right-of-way shall not exceed
0.5 footcandles
3. Protection of lighting fixtures: Light poles in a parking lot shall be protected from vehicles by curbed
landscape islands or curbed landscape diamonds.
4. Illumination levels and uniformity: The following criteria for minimum illumination, maximum
illumination, and uniformity shall be met for all parking lots.
Type of Development Minimum I.E.S. Illumination Maximum I.E.S. Illumination Uniformity
Level (Footcandles) Level (Footcandles)
Multi-family 1 .Q 15.0 4:1 (ave./min.')
Residential 15:1 (max./min.)
Commercial 2.0 24.0 3:1 (ave./min.)
12:1 (max./min.)
Industrial 2.0 30.0 4:1 (ave./min3
15:1 (max./min.)
Public, Semi-public, 2.0 24.0 3:1 (ave./min.)
and Institutiona~ 12:1 (max./m/n.)
B. Lighting Plan required: The building permit submission for any non-residential development or multi-
family residential development shall include a lighting plan si~ned and sealed by a professional cng/hoer
and including, at a minimum the following:
1. All property lines, building locations, dimensions of paved areas, and location of all curbs;
2. Fixture locations~
3. Fixture details and height;
4. Photometric data for all paved areas at a spacing of not greater than 20' and not greater than 6" above
the pavement surface;
5. Photometric data at all property lines at a spacing of not greater than 50' and not greater than 6" above
grade;
6. Scale of not less than 1" to 50';
7. Details of the proposed light poles and foundations~
8. Exiting and proposed utilities on the subiect property and in right-s-of-way adiacem to the subiect
property;
9. Other information, as required.
ANALYSIS
Parking lot lighting has recently become a zoning priority for an increasing number of communities. Lighting
can be an important issue for security and aesthetics. Light trespass onto adjacent properties is also an important
issue. Communities need to insure that public, commercial, and industrial parking areas are welMit enough to
ZBA 13-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 3
protect the security of the users. However, municipalities also. need to take steps to protect community
aesthetics and prevent light intrusion into nearby residential areas.
At the request of the Village Board, Community Development staff undertook a review of the Village's current
lighting requirements. Currently, the Village's Zoning Code has two provisions regarding parking lot lighting.
The code specifies that light is not to glare onto adjacent properties so as to cause a nuisance. The code also
requires that businesses extinguish their parking lot lights from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
The current codes do not specify a particular level of light that constitutes a "nuisance" and do not require
submission of a plan for lighting to give the Village an opportunity to prevent light trespass problems. Thus, the
Village's response to lighting problems is strictly reactive. When residents complain about lighting problems,
the Village investigates the complaint and attempts to solve the problem after the fact. Requiring submission of
a lighting plan with standards for light Ixespass will allow the Village to prevent problems before they occur.
The Police Department has expressed concern with the existing provision requiring lighting to be extinguished
during late night hours. The Department states that maintaining lighting of sites during those hours is desirable
for security reasons and should not be discouraged. The Village has historically had this requirement, but at this
point, the requirement is eliminated from the proposed language.
Staff also reviewed lighting requirements used in nearby communities, lighting ordinances from other
municipalities provided by the American Planning Association, and model ordinances provided by the
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (I.E.S.) and other professional organizations.
The regulations used by other municipalities consist of several types of regulations:
Specifications for fixtures and fixture heights - these requirements generally include fixture height and
cutoffrequirements, sometimes include specifications for particular types of light sources.
Minimum and maximum lighting intensity - these standards are typically measured in lumens,
footcandles, candela, or similar units
ca Uniformity of light intensity - This measures the evenness of lighting in the area in term of the ratio of
average intensity to minimum intensity, or sometimes the maximum intensity to minimum intensity.
rn Limitation of light intrusion - Most area communities state that light is not to intrude onto adjacent
properties, without requiring specific mechanisms for preventing intrusion. Most model ordinances
include a maximum light level at the property line and a requirement for a lighfmg plan to show the
light levels in the lot.
STANDARDS FOR TEXT AMEND1V[ENTS
Section 14.203.D.8.b lists standards for the Board to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code. The
standards relate to:
the general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel;
consistency 0f the amendment With objective~ of the Z0ning Code and Comprehensive Plan;
the degree to which the amendment would create non-conformity;
the degree to which the'amendment would make the Zon!ng Code more permissive; and
consistency of the amendment.with Village policy as established by previous rulings.
The proposed amendments are applicable to ali parcels in the Village that will have parking lots, and do not
affect a particular parcel. The amendments will create some new non-conformity, as the pr. oposed amendment
changes the Village's lighting standards. The extent of new non,conformity is difficult to:determine, a§ lighting
Plans are not available for many parking lots in the Village. However, the proposed requirements would apply
.0nly when neW parking lots are builg; existing lots expanded, or new lighting added to parking lots. The changes
BA 13-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 4
would not make the code more permissive. The proposed amendmonts are consistent with the intent of existing
provisions of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan, that is to protect residents from light trespass, provide
for security of users of parking lots, and maintain th[ Village's aesthetics. The amendment would give the
Village a stronger set of tools to promote those goals.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Text
Amendments in Section 14.203.D.8.b. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed Text
Amendment.
I Concur~
Director of Community Development
\\VHW02~DEPT~COMDEV~GEN~LNGkZBA~ZBA 2000~Staff MemosXZBA-13-2000(Text Amendment).doc
VWL
7/25100
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING)
OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT; COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 14.2219 entitled "Lighting" of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, as
amended, is hereby further amended by deleting said subsection in its entirety and substituting
therefor the following new Section 14.22.19, so that hereafter said Section 14.2219 shall be and
read as follows:
"14.2219. Lighting.
All parking lots with more than four (4) spaces shall provide lighting. Artificial lighting used to
illuminate any parking lot shall comply with the regulations as set forth in this Section."
A. General Requirements:
1. Pole height and material:
a. The height of light fixtures shall be limited to the district height limit or a maximum
of 30', whichever is less.
b. Light poles shall be constructed of metal, or other material acceptable to the
Village Engineer. Wood poles are prohibited.
2, Glare onto adjacent properties prohibited:
Electric lighting used to illuminate off-street parking areas or driveways shall be directed
away from adjacent properties and rights-of-way in such a way as to not create a
nuisance. The following standards shall be enforced to ensure that lighting does not
glare onto adjacent properties.
a. Cutoff luminaires with a total cutoff angle of not more than 90° shall be used in all
locations. The Director of Community Development may approve cutoff angles of
greater than 90° or the use of fixtures without cutoff luminaires upon submission of
information conclusively demonstrating that the proposed lighting will not cause
glare on adjacent properties.
b. Light intensity at a property line abutting a residential property shall not exceed 0.1
footcandles.
c. Light intensity at a property line abuttin{~ a non-residential property or right-of-way
shall not exceed 0.5 footcandles
Page 2/3
Parking lot lighting
3, Protection of lighting fixtures: Light poles in a parking lot shall be protected from vehicles
by curbed landscape islands or curbed landscape.diamonds.
, 4. Illumination levels and uniformity: The following criteria for minimum illumination,
maximum illumination, and uniformity shall be met for all parking lots:
Type of Development Minimum'l.E.S, Illumination Maximum I,E.S. Illumination Uniformity
Level (Footcandles) Level (Footcandles) ·
Multi-family Residential 1.0 15.0 4:1 (ave./min.)
15:1 (max./min.)
Commercial 2.0. 24.0 3:1 (ave./min.)
12:1 (max./min.)
industrial 2.0 30.0 4:1 (ave./min.)
15:1 (max./min.)
Public, Semi-public, 2.0 24.0 3:1 (ave./min.)
and institutional 12:1 (max./min.)
B. Lighting Plan required: The building permit submission for any non-residential development
or multi-family residential development shall include a lighting plan signed and sealed by a
professional engineer and including, at a minimum the following:
1. All property lines, building locations, dimensions of paved areas, and location of all curbs;
2. Fixture locations;
3. Fixture details and height;
4..Photometric data for all paved areas at a spacing of not greater than 20' and not greater
than 6" above the pavement surface;
5. Photometric data at ail property lines at a spacing of not greater than 50' and not greater
than 6" above grade;
6. Scale of not less than 1" to 50';
7, Details of the proposed light poles and foundations;
8. Exiting and proposed utilities on the subject property and in rights-of-way adjacent to the
subject property;
9. Other information, as required.
C. Nonconforming Lighting: Any existing parking lot lighting that does not conform to these
regulations shall be made to conform by means of alteration no later than January 1, 2005.
Page 3/3
Parking lot lighting
SECTION TVVO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
FROM: MICHAEL J. FIGOLAH, FIRE CHIEF
DATE: JULY 26, 2000
SUBJECT: VILLAGE CODE CHANGE
Attached is amended language to Chapter 4, Article IX of the Village Code, which
identifies the exempt ranks within the fire department. The current language
describes "one (1) Deputy Fire Chief, and four (4) Captain-Shift Commanders:"
The amended language clearly defines the actual staffing of one Deputy Fire Chief,
3 Captain-Shift Commanders, and one Captain-Training Officer.
MF
Cc: Village Clerk
G:\MF-Village Code Change-MEJ,doc ~
VWL
7/25/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IX OF CHAPTER 4
(APPOINTIVE VILLAGE OFFICERS)
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 4.901 entitled "Creation of Department; Appointment:" of Chapter
4 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting
Section 4.901 .A.2 in its entirety, and including the following language, so that hereinafter said
Section 4.901 .A.2. of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall read as follows:
"2. The Fire Chief is hereby authorized to appoint, from within or outside of the Mount
Prospect Fire Department, with the advice and consent of the Village Manager, one
Deputy Fire Chief, three (3) Captain-Shift Commanders, and one (1) Captain-Training
Officer; which positions shall be known as "exempt rank" positions. If a member of the
Fire Department is appointed to an exempt rank prior to being eligible to retire, he
shall be considered as on furlough from the rank he held at the time of his
appointment."
SECTION TVVO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
A"FI'EST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VWL
7/25/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY
OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the
Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, it has been determined that it is no longer
necessary, useful, or in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain
ownership of the personal property hereinafter described, and previously used by the
Television Services Division; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect to make available for donation, intemet auction, or private sale, any of the
personal property as described in the attached Exhibit "A."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Pursuant to its home rule power, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect find that the personal property described in the attached Exhibit
"A" now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, is no longer necessary or useful to the
Village of Mount Prospect and the best interests of the Village will be served by its
donation to schools, or sale.
SECTION TVVO: The Village Manager or his designate is hereby authorized and directed
to donate the aforementioned personal property now owned by the Village of Mount
Prospect, to area school districts, immediately upon passage of this Ordinance.
SECTION THREE: Any items remaining after said donation to Mount Prospect school
districts shall be immediately made available for internet auction by use of the website
www. eBay. com, or by private sale.
SECTION FOUR: Upon payment of the full auctioned price, the Village Manager or his
· idesignate is hereby authorized and directed to convey and transfer title to the aforesaid
personal property to the purchaser.
Page 2/3
Donate/sell property
SECTION FIVE: Any items remaining unsold after the above date may be disposed of by
the Village Manager or his designate in a manner which is in the best interests of the
Village.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Page 3/3
Donate/sell property
EXHIBIT A
Videotek Prodigy 8-input Special Effects Generator
S/N 04930626 - Estimated value $2,000 - Condition Good - internet auction
Commodore Amiga 4000 Computer w/Pro Video CG software
S/N 534802 - Estimated value $200 - Condition Good - possible sale
Commodore Amiga 1084 13" Color RGB Monitor
S/N LR58447 - Estimated value $50 '- Condition Good - possible sale
Panasonic AG-7510 Edit Controller
S/N 1 F036811 - Estimated value $100 - Condition Good - donation
Panasonic AG-7500A Edit VCR
S/N C9TC0085 - Estimated value $200 - Condition Good - donation
Panasonic AG-7510 VCP
S/N D9TC00294 - Estimated value $150 - Condition Good - donation
Panasonic AG-450 SVHS Camcorder
S/N COHD1000 - Estimated value $150 - Condition Good - possible sale
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: JULY 28, 2000
SUBJECT: CONSENT AGENDA
AMENDING ORDER OF BUSINESS
At its last regular meeting, the Village Board adopted an Ordinance establishing a
Consent Agenda and doing away with the concurrence votes for Plan Commission and
Zoning Board of Appeals Cases. As staff has worked to implement the Consent
Agenda in a logical and understandable manner, we have come to the realization that a
further Amendment of the "Order of Business" would help fulfill our goal.
The current Order of Business (per the recently adopted Ordinance) calls for the
Consent Agenda to be toward the end of the meeting. The proposed further
Amendment in your Agenda package would move the Consent Agenda to the beginning
of the Order of Business thus allowing us to dispose of routine matters early in the
meeting process. Agenda items will appear under the Order of Business as they
normally would. Consent Agenda "eligible" items would be marked with an asterisk (*).
if a request were made to remove an item, it would not be taken up under the Consent
Agenda but rather would be left for individual consideration in its normal spot on the
Agenda.
While this may sound extremely complicated, it really will make it easier for staff to
construct future Board Agendas as well as allow the Village Clerk to author coherent
Minutes. I will endeavor to offer a more coherent explanation of these changes at
Tuesday evening's Board meeting.
M EJ/rcc
c: Assistant Village Manager David Strahl I '
Village Clerk Velma Lowe
VWL
7/25/00
7/28/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II ENTITLED "RULES OF ORDER"
OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That paragraph C of Section 2.202 entitled "Order of Business; Regular
Meetings Only" of Chapter 2 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by
renumbering the following items, so that hereinafter said Section 2.202.C shall be and read as
follows:
"C. The written agenda shall set forth the order of business substantially as follows:
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Invocation
5. Approval of Minutes (of preceding regular meetings and special meetings, if any)
6. Approval of Bills and Financial Report
7. Mayor's Report
7. Communications and Petitions - Citizens to be Heard
8. Consent Agenda
9. Old Business
10. New Business
11. Village Manager's Report
13; Any Other Business (including items for information only)
14. Adjournment."
Page 2/2
Order of Business
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 'ri)l): 847392-60~,4
NOTICE
THE V'/EDNESDAY, AUGUST 2, .7-000 MEETING OF THE PLAN COMMISSION ItAS
BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT
SCHEDULED MEETING.
Dated tlxis 27tla day of July, 2000.