HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 07/18/2000Next Ordinance No. 5123
Next Resolution No 26-00
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South EmersOn Street July 18, 2000
Mount Prbspect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Hoefert
IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Wilks
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 20, 2000
VI. APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PRESENTATION: Mayor Gerald L. Farley Community Scholarships, in
conjunction with the Workforce Development Council
B. PRESENTATION: Firefighter Lowell J. Fell Memorial Scholarships,
presented by the Kiwanis Club of Mount Prospect
C. Appointments
ANY fNDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT '100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064.
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IX. OLD BUSINESS
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION FROM THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
~(NOWN AS 2 EAST RAND ROAD (Shell Oil C0,) (Exhibit A)
This ordinance grants an exception from the Development Code, Section 16.405,
to waive the rec uirement for on-site stormwater detention. The Plan Commissior~
voted 6-0 for approval of this request.
B. 2na reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE VILLAGE CODE ~
OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CORPORATE
AUTHORITIES WITH REGARDS TO CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE PLAN COMMISSION AND THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (Exhibit B)
This ordinance amends Chapter 2 of the Village Code by adopting the Consent
Agenda as a part of the order of business, and eliminates the concurrence
vote relative to Plan Commission and ZBA recommendations.
X. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 20-2000 802 S. William Street
The petitioner is requesting a variation to allow the construction of a new garage,
using the existing garage pad/floor, which currently encroaches into the side yard
setback. The Zoning Board has recommended approval of the request by a vote
of 4-0.
B. ZBA 21-2000, 2400 Terminal Drive, Road Runner Cartage
The petitioner is requesting an amendment to a Conditional Use permit, approved
August 17, 1999, to allow the construction of a steel garage. The Zoning Board of
Appeals has recommended approval of the request by a vote of 4-0.
C. ZBA 16-2000, 1104 S. Church Road
The petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a pool and deck addition to
encroach eight feet (8') into the rear yard setback and ten feet (10') into the
exterior side setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval
of the request by a vote of 4-0.
D. ZBA 8-2000, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
The petitioner is requesting amendments to the Village Code to add outdoor dining
areas as permitted uses in the B-3, B-4, and B-5 zoning districts, to establish
minimum standards for the operation of outdoor dining areas and to establish a
licensing process for Village review of them. The Zoning Board of Appeals has
recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.
E. ZBA 13-2000, Text Amendment, Village of Mount prospect
The petitioner is requesting amendments to the Village Code to establish
minimum standards for artificial lighting in parking lots. The Zoning Board of
Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 4-0.
F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF
CHAPTER 5 (BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit C
This ordinance provides for the dissolution :~f the Business Development
& Redevelopment Commission and the Sign Review Board, and reduces
the number of members required for the Plan Commission and the
Solid Waste Commission.
G. 1s' reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING).,
ARTICLE V OF THE VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit D)
This ordinance amends Chapter 14 (Zoning) relative to the establishment
of jurisdiction for the Zoning Board of Appeals over specific items previously
handled by the Sign Review Board.
H. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 40-84 RELATIVE
TO THE ILLINOIS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (Exhibit E
This resolution amends Section 5 (Fees) of Resolution No. 40-84, which
established rules and procedures for Freedom of Information requests.
I. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING "INTERESTED PARTIES" REGISTRIES
AND ADOPTING REGISTRATION RULES FOR SUCH REGISTRIES (Exhibit F)
This ordinance authorizes the establishment of a registry for persons
interested in the Village's TIF amendment actions and annual reports,
J. 1s~ reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPROVING AN AMENDMENT
TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT FOR THE
MOUNT. PROSPECT TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
NUMBER ONE (Exhibit G)
This ordinance amends the Village's Redevelopment Plan and directs the
Cook County Clerk to remit the property taxes levied in the 23rd year of the
TIF to the Village.
K. Request for motion to appoint a representative to the Joint Review Board for the
Village of Mount Prospect
Request for Board acceptance of Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
M. Request for Board acceptance of Tax Increment Financing Compliance Audit for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
N. Request for Board acceptance of Single Audit Act Compliance Report for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999.
Request for Board acceptance of Auditor's Management letter for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1999.
P. Request for Board adoption of the 2001 - 2005 Capital Improvements Plan.
Xl, VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Rec uest for Board acceptance of propOSal for design engineering services
For the Wedgewood stormsewer improvement and repairs to the Melas Park
and Crumleydetention basins.
B. Rea uest for Board acceptance of proposal from Earth-Tech, Inc. for construction
~nspection and construction management services for the Weller Creek Bank
Stabilization Project, Phase A~2.
C. Status Report
Xll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Xlll, CLOSED SESSION
PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 lc) (2)- "Collective negotiating matters between the public
body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary
schedules for one0r more classes oi' employees.'.'
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
H:\GEN\files\WIN~AGENDA~Ju. 18. 2000,doc
MINUTES OF THE, RECtOR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND B~RD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSpEcT
JUNE 20, 2000
CALL CALL TO ORDER
TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL
ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Timothy Comoran
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Absent: Trustee Irvana Wilks
PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Trustee Corcoran led the Pledge of Allegiance,
INVOCATION INVOCATION
Trustee Prikkel gave the invocation.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MINUTES Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held June 6, 2000.
Upon roll calh Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Abstain: Lohrstorfer
Motion carried.
BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Hoefert. seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve payment of the
following bills:
General Fund $ 496,225
Refuse Disposal Fund 115,325
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 128 r243
Local Law Enfomement BIk Grant Fund 1997 9.025
Community Development Block Grant Fund 15 192
Debt Service Funds
Capital Improvement Fun¢ 36,859
Capital improvement Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Const. Fund 56.121
Street Improvement Construction Fund 74,105
Flood Control Construction Fund 1,025
Water & Sewer Fund 317.707
Parking System Revenue Fund 1,187
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 17,003
Vehicle Replacement Fund 26,287
Computer Replacement Fund
Risk Management Fund 399,736
Police Pension Fund 5,346
Fire Pension Fund 5,282
Flexcomp Trust Fund 19,797
Escrow Deposit Fund 16,194
Benefit Trust Funds
$1.788,371
Upon roll,calh Ayes: Corcoren, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FINANCIAL FINANCIAL REPORT
REPORT Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran. moved for aoDrOVal of the financial
reoort dated January 1 - May 3i. 2000. -
U[~on roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hcafert, Prikke. Skowron Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried:
MAYOR'S MAYOR'S REPORT
REPORT: Mayor Farley introduced Greg~anella, Mount Prospect Jaycees President, wno
presented the winners of the'~nnuaI Keith Baker Scholarship. Mr. Canella stated the
JAYCEES scholarsh p fund is a joint effo~ between the Jaycees and Fantasy Amusement
SCHOLARSHIP Company, established to aS~ ~ ir~ furthering the education of young adults.
WINNERS
Scholarship winners were:
Carolyn Martz
David Kruchten
Michael Puzen
Katarzyna Szymanek (not in attendance)
APPTS. There were no board or commission appointments made at this meeting:
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
There were no commems from the audience.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 10-2000 ZBA 10-2000, 507 S. Wille Street
507 S, WILLE An ordinance was presented for secono reading to grant a variation for an oversized, 672
ST. sq. ft., two-car detached garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals hac previously voted 3-2
to approve the request and the Village Board had voted 5-2 for approval.
ORD. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5117 No. 5117:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 507 SOUTH WlLLE STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hcefert, Prikkel, Skowron. Wilks
Nays: None:
Motion carried
ZBA 18-2000 ZBA 18-2000, 1610 W. Algonquin Road, United Airlines
1610 W. An ordinance was presented;for first reading, which would amend the official zomng map
ALGONQUIN by rezoning the subject properly from R-4 (Multi-family Development) to B-3 (Community
Shopping) district. This rezsning was requested by United Airlines as part of project to
RD. develop a parking lot. The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the
petitioner's request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Hoefert, referring to a discussion of June 6, 2000, asked if any dates had been
established to discuss the possible annexation of Certain United Airlines properties to the
Village. Village Manager MichaeI.Janonis responded that a meeting date would be
scheduled for the near future.
Trustee Oorcoran, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: CorcoCan, Hcefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - June.20, 2000
Trustee Corcoran seconded~ ~ , ~¢ Pr kke moved for approva of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5118: ~ '?"'~'~'~'~ "'
NO. 5118
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH RESPECT TO THE
ZONING OF.CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R.-4 TO B-3 DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1610 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert. Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron.
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 18-2000 ZBA 18-2000, 1610 W. Algonquin Road United Airlines
1610 W. An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would grant e Conditional Use permit
ALGONQUIN for the construction of a 519 space, stand-alone parking ot on the north side of Algonquin
RD. Road, east of Busse Road, The Zoning Board had recommended approval of this
request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded ~)y Trustee Prikket, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert, Lohrstorfer,,Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carrie¢
ORD. Trustee Comoran, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved for aDproval of Ordinance
NO. 5119 No. 5119:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1610 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corceran. Hoefert, Lohrstorfer. Prikkel, Skowren
Nays: None
Motion carded.
ZBA 19-2000 ZBA 19-2000, 503 S. Main Street
The petitioner had originally requested a Conditional Use permit to allow the construction
503 S. MAIN ST. of a three (3) car attached garage as part of a new hdme at that address. The Zoning
Board of Appeals had voted 6-0 for approval, however, William Cooney, Director of
Community Development for the Village, indicated the petitioner had formally requestee
the case be withdrawn from consideration by the Village Board. There was no further
action on ZBA 19-2000.
PC 05-2000 NEW BUSINESS
2 E. RAND RD. PC 05-2000, 2 E; Rand Road, Shell Oil Company
A request was presented for an exception from the Development Code to waive the
requirement for on-site stormwater detention at the subject property. The Plan
Commission had recommended approval of the request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Hoefert asked if an environmental survey of the property had been conducted.
The petitioner answered in the,negative Bill Cooney., Director of Community
Development~ indicated that staff will check on the status of the existing tanks.
The petitioner addressed additional questions relative-to the ingress and egress of the
property, after which Trustee Corceran, seconded by Trustee Hcefert moved to concur
with the Zoning Board's recommendation to approve the request.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel. Skowren
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 -June 20,2000
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the July 18 Village Board meeting.
REAL ESTATE An ordinance was presented for first reading which would authorize the Village to
PURCHASE: purchase property at 411 Besiness center Drive. Mr. Cooney stated that the purchase
411 BUSINESS will allow the Village to provide, roadway improvements necessaw for realigning the
CENTER DR. Harvest Lane/Business Cente¢ Dri've intersection. He further stated that the cost of the
property will not exceed ~;18,500, wtt~ the intersection improvements costing
approximately $50;000.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded bY Trustee Hoefert. moved to waive the rule reauiring two
readings of an ordinance,
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: N0n~
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Corcoran seconded 3y Trustee Hoefert moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5120 No. 5'120:
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY BY THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. AT 411 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert. Lohrstorfer. Prikkel. Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VACATE An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would allow for the vacation of
PROPERTY: Village-owned property atthe corner of Sunset Road and Robert Drive.
SUNSET ROAD
& ROBERT DR. Trustee Corcoran. seconded by Trustee Hoefert. moved to waive the rule reouiring ~vo
.eadings. of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert. Lohrstorfer, Pdkkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee' Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefed, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5121 No. 5121:
AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN PROPERTY (PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)
QWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AT THE CORNER OF SUNSET
ROAD AND ROBERT DRIVE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran Hoefert. Lohrstorfer, Pdkkel Skowron
Nays: NOne
Motion carried.
PURCHASE An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would authorize the Village To join the
ELECTRICAL Chicago A~liance, a group of over 60 municipalities, in considering electrical suppliers, as
POWER: an alternative to.purchasing power from Commonwealth Edison.
CHICAGO
ALLIANCE Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 - June 20, 2000
Trustee Corcoram seconded 5~' ~'~U~:be Skgwron moved for approval of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5122, with the designation of Assistant ~iiiage Manager David Strahl as
NO. 5122
representative for the Village.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO
PARTICIPATE IN THECHICAGO ALLIANCE FOR BULK ELECTRICAL PURCHASES
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel. Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried,
An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would amend Chapter 2 of the
Village Code, by adopting the Consent Agenda as a part of the order of business.
This ordinance will be presented for second reading at the July 18 meeting of the Village
Board.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BID RESULTS: Bid results were presented, for the cleaning of McDonald Creek, including tl3e removal of
dead trees and pruning of dead tree limbs over six inches (6") in diameter. Mr. Janonis
TREE REMOVAL stated that only one company, B. Haney & Sons had submitted a bid, which was for
& PRUNING $787.00 per fifty foot (50') segment. He explained that the recent severe thunderstorms
have provided many companies with so much work that the need to go out for bids on
projects is not as critical as at other times.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the
B. HANEY recommendation of staffto award a contract to B. Haney & Sons in an amount not to
& SONS exceed $50.000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoranl Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PAVEMENT Bid results were presented for the year 2000 pavement-marking project. The following
MARKING bids were received:
PROJECT _BIDDER AMOUNT
Preform Traffic Control Systems, LtC $37,122.99
Marking Specialists Corp. 42.321.40
AC Pavement Striping Co. 69,684.27
Mr. Janonis stated the bids received were based on estimated quantities which would be
adjusted so the total expenditure does not exceed the budgeted amount.
PREFORM Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron. moved to concur with the
recommendation of staff to award a contract to Preform Traffic Control Systems, Ltd. for
TRAFFIC pavement marking and striping on Village streets and lots in an amount not to exceed
CONTROL $31,200.00.
SYSTEMS
Upon roll calk Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer. Pdkkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carde(:J
COMPUTER A request was presented for Board approval for the purchase of computer network
EQUIPMENT, system upgrades and network management software for the Village.
SOFTWARE
PURCHASE Trustee CorcOran, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with staff's
recommendation and approve the purchase of computer network system upgrades from
Novell NetWare 4.11 to NetWare 5.1, and to purchase ZENworks for Desktops 2, for an
amount not to exceed $27,020,
Page 5 -June 2(], 2000
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, H0efert. Lohrstorfer. Prikkel. Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Janonis noted several upcoming ~mportant dates. He also informed the audience that
a concrete workers strike was delaying the Route 83 construction proiect.
OTHER ANY OTHER BUSINESS
BUSINESS Trustee Hoefert asked that staff investigate the numerous holes in the sidewalks near the
Train station, and asked that efforts be made for beautification of the work sheds by that
same station
Trustee Hoefert also noted tne recent death of Henry Graef. Iongtime resident of the
Village.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Fadey declared the meeting adjourned at 8:19 p.m.
Page 6 - June 20 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
29-Jun-00
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 06/16/00 to Per Attached Credits/ Balance
06/15/00 06/29/00 List of Bills Debits 06/29/00
General Fund 7,488,606 236,360 384,974 7,339,992
Snecial Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,496,137 39,424 1,535,560
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 1,359,957 2,204 8,936 1,353.225
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 1,776 1.776
Community Development Bik Grant Fund 44,300 52 13,497 30,854
Debt Service Funds 3,559,469 0 22,769 3,536,700
Caoital Pro_lects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 2,592,569 10,800 35,614 2,567,755
Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 53,951 53,951
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 179,953 179,953
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 233,861 38,721 195,140
Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,135,920 39,921 138,510 4,037,331
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,697 4,697
Flood Control Construction Fund 1,157,928 0 18,023 1,139,905
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 2,990,520 155,416 28,330 3,117,605
Parking System Revenue Fund 708,319 5,869 7,412 706.777
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 171,000 221 13,942 157,279
Vehicle Replacement Fund 4,991,122 16,261 4,974,862
Computer Replacement Fund 256,711 256,711
Risk Management Fund 3,033,202 47,567 11,232 3,069,537
Trust & Agency Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,366,813 0 28,054 31,338,759
Fire Pension Fund 32,390,079 15 25,078 32,365,016
Flexcomp Trust Fund (1,606) 8,911 2,801 4,503
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,496,202 16,413 21,486 1,491,129
Benefit Trust Funds 97,537 0 544 96,993
99,809,021 563,t 72 8t 6,184 99,556,009
%EPONT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 i5:58 RUN: RODROSDAY JUN2800 t7:18 PAGE 1
R~LRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PROSENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTHES F~C~ JUNE 16 2000 TO ~UNE 29 2000
DHPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR RA~E I~OICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT
02919 303 CAB ASSDOIATIONi INC. SENIOR T~Xt RIDES 408.70
01820 AA SWIF~ PRINT, INC. N~SL~TER PRINTING 5600.00
04963 ADk~S, SRAUNA REIMBUHSS'4ENT 50.00
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~TERIAA CO. MISC.MARDWARE 48.89
MISC.HARDMARO 564.39
MISC.~5~RDWAAE 10.56
MISC.HAHDWADE 61.20
685.04
01246 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL CYLINDER RONTAL 75..7,5
05053 ALL AMERICAN DRUM A~D BUGLE CORE 4TH OF JULY PARADE 3500.00
01423 ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING CUMPANY RATCHING/PAVING MATERIALS 517.29
01561 A~IERIdAN CHARGE SERVICE SENIOR TAXI RIDES 114.40
01670 k~ERICA~ PLANNING ASSOCIATION MEMBER DUES 335.00
RO~ER DUES ID~1087155 295.00
630.00
01780 A~ERITECH PAY PHONE SERVICES 57.45
01833 ANDEASON LOCK CUMPANY MISC.~k~3,DWAAE 115.36
01840 ANDEROON PEST CONTROL PROVE}INTVE SEUICE 66.25
03327 ANDERSON, PETER TAI CHI CLASSES 350.00
01968 APA-CMS JOB PLACEMENT AD 110.00
01994 ARa)g~{ REFROSHig.~NT SEMNTCRO COF~E SUPPLIES 88.30
05052 APJINGTOROS BARBERSHOP ~ORU$ 4TH OF JULY PAAADB 300.00
02167 AA~OW ROAD CONSTRUCTION PATCHING/PAVING MATERIALS 69t.20
01124 ARTHUR CLESE~, INC. LAW~ SU?PLI~ 703.86
AAH SNPPLIES 153.58
~ SUPPLIES 969.00
~A~ SUPPLIES 778.86
2605.30
02261 ASSOCIATED ATTRACTIONS ~NT.INC 4T~ OF ,~LY PADADB 1400.00
05044 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM TAC UNiT IZ. ASE 1413.29
0278~ BEST QUALITY CLEANING, INt. CLStNUP AT PUBLIC SAFETY 150.00
REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2000 I7:18 PAGE 2
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 16 2000 TO JUWE 29 2000
BHPT ~DOR NBR VENROR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION ARUNNT
05051 BLUE SAINTS 4TH OF JULY PARADE 1200.00
05055 BROWN, DEREK REIMBUREE~{ENT 50.00
00477 BURRS, PAUL REIMB SAFETY SHOES 296.24
05056 BU~S, JAMES REBATE 105.00
01001 BUtRELL, STEVE REIMB-UNRENSES 69.99
01006 BHREE CAR ~ASB, INC. CAR ~AS~{ REBVICH 5.25
01000 HUSSE'S FLO~RS & GIFTS ELDERHUNOM ~OWERE 82~00
01049 CDW ROVEENi~ENT, INC PALM V ORGANIZER 304.31
PALM V ORG~N!ZEA 304.32
60L63
01056 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY CARE i/2 SHEET 50.04
01058 CENTURY LABS, INC CLEANING SUPP 323.55
01062 CERTIFIED ENFORTING COMPANY SERVICE 360.00
01075 CHICAGO M~RO CHAPTER APEA REGISTRATION FEES 230.00
01004 C~{ICAGO TRIBUNH AD RO~384577301 036.00
01099 CIRCUIT CITY STORES #3115 RETI~T GIF~ 413.46
01118 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL FOR - 062900 700.00
PAYROLL FOR- 062900 190.00
090.00
04007 COARY, NANCY ADVANCE-FIELD TRIPS 1350.00
04796 D.C.N. PRODUCTIONS, INC. $UNP SUITS 47.50
01222 DAILY HELD AD 323.24
AD T2262058,225,660,087,000 3812.06
4135.30
01223 DAILY OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES I25.33
OFFICE SUPPLIES 33.84-
91.49
05061 ~ATAEA~E TECUNOtf~GIES SERVICE RENDERED-JU~E,2000 150.00
01262 DEWOLFE MUSIC LIBRARY FREIGHT ON INV 0112674 9.00
05066 ~OK~, ~ RESIDENT ~ ESTATE REBATE 436.00
01291 ROV~ ~.,-~A~ON COMPANY ~{AINTENAMCE I90.57
R?PORT: APBOARDRPT GLNERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 t7:18 PAGE 3
RELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRERENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TBUSTEES
FROM J~NE I6 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01313 DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC. PULVERIZED TOPSOIL 495.00
01350 ~DEAVOR PLUS EXAN-A.KG~LARZ 145.00
01369 FAIRVI~ REINTING SERVICE PRINT BROCBURE 315.00
01372 FAST BREAK,~E STYLE TEAN 4TH OF JULY PARADE 400.00
01391 FINN, MEGAN REI~ DR SAFETY SHOES 85.00
REI~UREEMENT 50.00
135.00
00102 FIRE PRESIUN FUND PAYROLL FOR - 062900 12168.37
03957 FLOREY, MARGARET REIMBURSEMENT SEMINAR COSTS 75.00
01422 FOLGERS F~AG & DECORATING, INC SUPPLIES 1314.50
CONTRACT FOR STREET LIGHT 3396.20
4710.70
05067 FOREYTRE, TOM REFUND PERMIT 99-0275 100.00
05043 GILBERT, ADAM REBATE 5 SQ PUBLIC WAlK 175.00
01516 GOVEk~IMRE~ FINANCE OFFOR ASSOC APPLICANT FEE 480.00
01555 EANEY AND SONS, B. INC. DISFOSAL OF DEBRIS 171.25
00345 BANNEMAN, LESTE~ a. REiI~½-SHOES 37.53
01558 HANREN ASSOCIATES MONTHLY SERVICE 527.42
MONTHLY SERVICE 275.11
MONTHLY SEMNTCE 100.00
902.53
01609 HOLY FANILY ~DICA~ CL'~EM PBYSICA~-W.SANCREZ 422.00
PRE-EMPL PHYSICALS 980.00
t402.00
05070 HONTON, CHRISTOPHER RESIDZNT ~ ESTATE WEBATE 624.00
00106 IOMA RNTIP~2X? TRUST - 401 IOMA-40I Pt~%i~ 6/15 425.63
PAYROLL }'OR - 062900 3t9.22
744.85
00107 I~XA RNTIRE~N~ TRUST - 457 PAYROLL ~1~ - 0629~0 14225.09
01673 ILLINOIS ~ P~. ASSN. ~ERSMAI~ DOES 35.00
00108 ILLINOIS REpARTF~.NT OF REUN~OE PA~IROLL FOR - 062900 18324.18
REPORT: APBOARMRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 I5:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 17:18 PAGE 4
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE i6 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DE~T VENDOR NER VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01689 ILLINOIS GFOA A/P SRMINAK 7/2I 130.00
01122 ILLINOIS STATE DISBURS~q2~T UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 062900 519.23
PAYROLL FOR - 062900 195.50
714.73
03942 INTERMEDIA CC~3NICATIONS INTEUNET SERVICES 1376.66
01740 INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF POLICE REGISTER-K. NAGEL 150.00
01828 IRON AGE COR~ VARIETY OF SHOES 941.55
01896 J.C. LICET CUNPAMY MISC.PAINTING SUPPLIES 9.43
MISC. PAINTING SUPPLIES 121.45
130.88
00353 JASON!S, MICHAEL E. LUNCH/MEETING 52.32
01772 JESSE WEITE ~]~BLERE 4TH OF J~LY PAPADE 800.00
01794 KALE UNIPORES, INC. SUPPLIES 147.25
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 313. I5
BODY ARMOR RMPLACEMEA~7 770.00
1230.40
05071 I~ARYT, DONALD OVERPAYMENT 24.00
01811 WEEFER'S PHAAMACY ACCU CHECK TEST STRIPS 40.17
01827 KLEIN, THORPE AND JEMEINS,LTD. LEGAL RES-LIQUOR C~ 500.00
LEGAL F~ES -GUNEPJ~ 13935.20
14435.20
65073 KOZAK, RICNAR~ DUPLICATE PAYMENT 54.00
05074 KOZY, NORMAN DUPLICATE PA~F/~T 10.00
04490 KUUN, WEITH REIMBURREWi~T 50.00
02960 LAKE COUNTY MOUNTED POSSE 4TH OF JULY PARADE 250.00
01897 LIUN ASSIST laTEX ~REE GLOVES 187.00
05041 LIUNS CLUB DONATION IN ML~ORY 25.00
01918 LUNDNTRC~'S NVR~ERY VANDOUN SHRUBS 3735,00
TURF MO~ING 2908.81
6643.01
U4956 ~DO~.~/.~' N PRISONER POOD-MAY 144'.19
NI979 ~CI ~I~L5~S SERVICE 6/24-5/23/00 $09.63
P~PORT: APBOARDENT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 17:I8 PAGE 5
· RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOU~T PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ JUNE I6 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DHPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~OICE DESCRIFltON AMOON~
SERVICE 80.38
SERVICE 78.76
SERVICE 153.56
SERVICE 83.93
SERVICE 35.08
1341.34
00116 METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 062900 730.00
04138 MIDWEST DATA CORP. CLEk~ING OF ACCT HPSSI 150.00
02028 MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS CERTIFICATE HOLDERS 35.00
05042 MILLER, RE'NE SEW 33 PATCHES 99.00
05077 MISRE, JOSEPH RESIDS~ ESTATE REBATE 540.0~
02046 14OBILE PRINT INC. BUSINESS CARDS 35.00
02066 MOONT PROSPECT CHk~3ER OF CO{~vZRCB GOLF/LUNCH RESERVATIONS 880.00
02067 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOC. DOEATDON-MS'4ONY OF 100.00
JUI4E PMT 2916.67
3016.67
05049 MI. PROSPECT COiOH]NITY BAND 4TH OF JULY PARADE 300.00
03963 MVPA 4TH OF JU~Y PARADE t50.00
02109 NATIONAL AProN DAY FOUNDATION BROCHURE 28.95
05046 NATIONAL PEN CORP. SUPPLIES 50.57
02140 NATOA NATOA AWARDS ENTRY ~E 90.00
02148 NEODOST 2 INK CARTRIDOES-RED 42.50
05045 NORTNEROOK PARK DISTRICT PACT CAMP EXPENSE 150.00
02193 NONTHWENT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 95.13
ELECTRICAl, SUPPLIES 288.59
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 236.30
ELECTRIC-AL SUPPLIES 459.05
1077.07
02199 NORTHWEST STATIOWEES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 240.9I
OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.85
OFFICE SUPPLIES 46.80
OFFICE S{}~PLIES 49.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES 256.80
611,]1
02210 NUt4BEES AUTOMATION INE SERVICE A{2NEENEN~ 150.00
REPORT: APDOAEDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 17:18 PAGE 6
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 16 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DEPT VENDOR NRR VENDON NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOOMT
02230 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN LASER POST CARDS 99.95
02238 ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE SERVICE 29.00
00123 PEESCO PAYROLL FOR - 062900 16286.18
02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 14.20
MISC EXPENSES 48.95
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES 10.00
MISC EXPENSES 10.00
MISC EXPENSES 40.50
M/SC EXPENSES 93.75
M!SC EXPENSES 9.92
MISC EXPENSES 63~36
MISC EXPENSES 11.78
M!SC EXPENSES 4.82
MISC EXPENSES 45.00
MISC EXPENSES I6.84
MISC EXPENSES 20.72
MISC EXPENSES 13,30
MISC EXPENSES 22.75
MISC EXPENSES 71.i1
MISC EXPENSES 36.51
MISC EXPENSES 12.97
MISC EXPENSES 21.68
MISC EXPENSES 5.79
MISC EXPENSES 88.80
MISC EXPENSES 7.82
MISC EXPENSES 11.95
MISC EXPENSES 11.52
MISC EXPENSES 6.95
MISC EXPENSES 26.67
MISC EXPENSES 25.00
MISC EXPENSES 12.92
MISC EXPENSES 10.72
MISC EXPENSES 32.00
MISC ENPENRES 100.00
916.30
02303 PETTY CASE - FIRE DENT. EXET/TRNG/SUPP 25.52
MEET/TREG/SUPP 43.80
MEET/TREG/SUFR 44.85
ME~/TENG/SUFR 22.83
MEET/TENG/SUFR 11.02
MEET/TENG/SUPP 3.69
MEET/TENG/SOPP 14.12
MEET/TRNG/SUPP 15. I4
180.97
02304 P~TfY CASH - POLICE DENT. MISC EXPENSES 251.75
MISC EXPENSES 3t.55
MISC EXRENS~ 7.24
MtSC EXPENSES 62.35
~LBASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT . :
LIST OF BILLS PREENNTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 16 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DEFT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
MISC ~XPENSES 35.43
388.32
02305 PETTY CASH - FUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 38.76
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 2.35
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES I29.82
170.93
00124 POLICE PENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 062900 14991.50
04921 POPE, ELIZABETH a. PAYROLL FOR - 062900 923.08
02338 PRAIRIE BRASS BAND 4TH OF JULY PARADE 1000.00
02358 PROSAENTY SALTY SUPPLIES 243.3i
02363 PROSPECT MARCHING KNIGHTS 4TN OF JULY PARADE 1400.00
02379 QUILL C, ORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 47.49
02393 RAY O'HERRON CO.,INC. CUSTOM HONOR GUARD BADGES 1036.80
02396 RAYMENK OFFICE PROD & FURN STABP 34.50
02401 RED WING SHOE STORE VARIOUS SHOES & SOCRE 2059.00
02400 REID END ASSOCIATES, JOHN E. PEN-E~PLOYi~ENT TESTING 175.00
04980 RESCHKE, JOE REIMB-CDL 50.00
04981 RENZKE, SHANNON REIMBUESENENT 50.00
02467 ROURE-RAMD~EST SHOP CENT, INC. JUNE-RENT 2000.00
02470 RUEFRER STAMP WORKS STAMP 39.00
04673 SEN BERNARDINO COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYFf2;TS PAYROLL FOR - 062900 211.85
02495 ENYERS COMPUTER SOOUCE MAINTENANCE KIT 754.50
02536 SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC. GIFTS FOR VOL~NTREES 376.42
02542 SENPP PEST CONTROL PES~T CONTROL 590.00
05079 SHILLING ~CHANICA5 PLYING FEE 40.00
P~ ~[VIEN RE 20.00
60.00
03803 SHORE ~LERIRE, INC. FIREA~H~S PURCHASE 349.50
02S44 SHRED FIRST INC. SUPPLIES 174.00
026'00 · SPRING AIR FILTER, INC. ~ A/C FURNACE FILTERS 152.{{3
A/C FU]U4ACB FILTP. ES 202.N3
REPORT: APBOARDKPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 17:I8 PAGE S
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~SENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ ~E 16 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DER VENDOR NNR VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~O~NT
a/c ~ACE FILTERS 15233
A/C ~3RNACE FILTER~ 152.83
A/C ~ACE FILTERS i52.84
A/C ~ACE FILTE~ 152.84
967.00
04998 ST~TEGIES ~GISTRE-~CZ,ROBE~TS 170.Q0
~GISTRE-F.~UPA 85.00
25530
05058 S~, ~ ~BURS~E~ 54.09
05050 TAR HEELS SUN D.B.C. 4TH OF ~LY PADRE 2000.00
02684 TE~CE SUPPLY C~P~ SUPPLIES 163.92
05083 THE CITY OF ~TON ~GISTE~-J.RE~O~E 550.00
04984 TR~,, VIREINIk ~I~-CD5 50
02691 TR~PS~ ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS SERVICES 330.00
02722 T~I-STATE ELECTR~IC CORP ELE~RIC~ SUPPLIES 113.55
02723 T~IT~ ELECtrICS, IR. RODIO ~PAI~ I63.50
02756 ~ITED STATES POST~ SEUICE POSTAGE AC~ 06983947 3000.00
POSTAGE ~SLE~E~ 2809.07
5809.07
00127 ~ITED WAY PAYROLL D~ - 062900 334.00
02789 V~, ~I~ ~I~-SA~Y SHOES 44.65
05004 ~RIZ~ WITLESS PAGER SEUICE 1265.81
02800 VIDEO ~GES, IR. ~ VIDEO E~IP 175.00
00128 VIL~GE OF ~ PROSRE~ PAYROLL ~ - 062900 2591.54
MCAT DUES I500.00
4091.54
04314 VIL~GE OF ~ PROSP~ - PAYROLL ~S PAYROLL ~ - 062500 58.96
PAYROLL ~ - 062900 154332.06
PAYROLL ~R - 062900 18545.59
PAYROLL DR - 062900 12456.0i
185392.62
05040 ~SI~Y SY~J, LTD. FISH'RE SO~ 2955.00
02821 ~ ~, ~L&PO~R,S.C. ~ES t105H.45
P. EPOET: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 I5:80 KUN: WEDNESDAY J~JN2800 17:18 PAGE 9
R~LEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF SILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F~ JENE 16 2000 TO J~NE 29 2000 '
DE~T V~NDOE NBR VENEOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT
02832 WAL-MAET STORES, INC. MISC.SUPPLIES 100.60
MISC. SUPPLIES i7.94
SUPPLIES 128.17
246.71
00458 NEGER, MARK REIMB ~PENEES 51.25
02884 WIRES INDUSTRIES, INC. REPAIR PARTS 407.00
04100 WOLTER, DA~E NEBATE I40.00
00464 ~5BEC~EE, JEFFREY ~E!M~-SUPERSTARS BO~LING 141.75
05081 WYKONEKI, NO~ENT NESID~ET REAL ESTATE NEBATE 180.00
TO?AL 384973.94
050
02167 ARAO~ ROAD CONSTRUCTION STREET RESURF.PEOG 8936.23
TO~AL 8936.23
01222 DAILY RE~D AD 68.30
00335 FOL~Y, APRIL B. CASH ADVA/{CE-NENTOR ~ING 150.00
05014 MI~ET G~E~ C~STKU~ION S ~ P~-J~S LI~ 12200.00
02052 MO~, MIC~L J. SEUICES 370.50
02659 SUBU~ P~Y H~TH CO~CIL BILLING 708.33
T~ 13497.21
170
04324 B~K ONE PAYING ANEK ~E 175.00
PAYING AG~ ~E 175.00
350.00
T~AL 350.00
250
04324 B~ O~ RAYING AG~ ~ 225.00
PAYING AG~ ~E 225.0Q
450.00
450.00
270
043~4 B~K ONE ~ ~-9~B 450.00
~E : 450.00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GEWEKATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 I7:18 PAGE 10
~LEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIsT OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE DOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM J~NE 16 2000 TO ~]NE 29 2000
DEPT VENDOR NB~{ ~NDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRINTION AXOUNT
28O
04324 ' BANK ONE PAYING AGENT ~EE 300.00
TOTAL 300.00
310
04324 BANK ONE RAYING AGENT FEE 150.00
TOTAL 150.00
320
04324 BANK ONE PAYING AGENT FEE 75.00
TOTAL 75.00
330
0i324 BANK ONE PAYING AGENT FEE I50.00
TOTAL 150.00
340
04324 BANK (JNE AGENT FEE-96A 225.00
TOTAL 225.00
35O
04324 B~K ONE PAYING AGENT FEE 150.00
TOTAL 150.00
36O
04324 BANK ONE PAYING AGENT FEE 300.00
TOTAL 300.00
38O
04830 ILL ENVIR PROT. AGENCY FOR WRF 270 EPA LOAN L17-0856 P 12527.94
EPA LOAN L17-0856 I 7116.48
19644.42
TOTAL 19644.42
410
04324 Bk~K ONE PAYING AGENT REP 150.00
TOTA~ 150.00
420
04324 BANK ONE AGENT PEE-96A 225.00
TOTAL 225.00
430
04314 ~A~KOME PAYING AGE~T FEE 150.00
TOTAL 150.00
R~PONT: APBOAXDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JON2800 17:18 PAGE 11
RELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F~ON JUNE i6 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
REPT ~;EN~R NBR VENDOR NAME I~OICE DESCRIPTION AMO]NT
04952 CIOREA GROUP INC. SERVION/REGINEERING 13076.43
01610 HOME DEPOT INV-1010864 98.40
INV-2022292 53.59
I~-6012053 49.05
INV-0010087 51.52
INV-7010437 4.76
INV-9020205 59.78
317.10
05084 LEIBOFORTH, ROBERT REI~BU~SAMENT 71.38
02064 MOTOROLA, INC. VAM 650 RADIO MODE~8 22!49.0D
TOTAL 35613.91
550
04124 ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES CONT~INATED SOIL REMOVED 27672.88
01716 ILLINOIS TAX tNCRL~ENT ASSOC. SALES TAX TRE MEMBERSHIP 750.00
01827 KLEIN, THORPE AND JREKINS,LTD. LEGAL FEES-TIF 2706.00
02521 SDI CONSULTANTS LTD. PRORESSIONAL SERVICES 4995.42
STREET PLA~S 2597.06
7592.48
TOTA]~ 38721.36
56O
02167 AM~ON ROAD CONSTRUCTION STREET RECONS. PROG. 138510.28
TOTAL 138510.28
590
02476 RA}~TH TECH INC E~GINRERING SE~ICE 17998.61
02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPt. MIDC ~XRENSES 24.00
TOTAL 18022.61
610
01820 AA S~I~ PPJNT, INC. NEWSLETTER PPJNTING 3500.00
01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. MISC.RARDNARE I48.56
01620 A~{~ICAM ~AMDSCAPING INC. PAint, AY R&$'fORA~ION 3390.75
01124 ARTH~ CLESEN, INC. LA~ SUP~LIL~ 228.00
02451
~r~ ~"r L~S 2643.00
REPORT: APBOARDR?T GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 17:18 PAGE 12
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE EOAD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 16 2000 TO ~NE 29 2000
DER VENDOR NER VENDOR NA~R INVOICE DRECRI~ION AMOUNT
3484.85
04324 BANK ONE PAYING AGENT ~EE 175.00
05064 BOESCHE, REVIN PAINTING FI~E HYDRANTS i50.00
05054 BRAUS, AMANDA R~IMBERS~EXT 32.46
01053 CELLOLA~ ONE - CHICAGO REHVICE 131.28
01075 CHICAGO METRO C~APTER APWA ~GISTRATION FEES 230.00
05057 CHICAGO SUBUREAN EXPRESS, INC. SHIPPING CEARGES 28.99
05066 DORN, WALTER WATER 30.15
SEWER 3.
· 33.30
05047 EL~IN SREEPING SERVICES, INC. CONTRACTUAL CLEANING 10815.00
01576 RELLER'LUXBER CO. MISC.BUILDING SUPPLIES 13.60
01896 J.C. 5ICHT COMPANY MISC.PAINTING SUPPLIES 9.49
01787 JULRE, INC. SERVICE CHARGES 766.40
05072 RAP-S~ PROPERTIES, INC RE~D 9.69
REFUND 1.02
10.71
05062 ~ INFONMATION SERVICE REGISTRATION 165.00
05075 ~OPACEK, AJ. REFUNB 9.6g
~OND 1.02
10.71
01918 LONDSTROM'S NUttY TURF MOWING 240.02
02042 MINO?EMA~ PRESS SUPPLIES 983.51
02163 NIES ENGINEERING, INC. DESIGN ENGINEERING 1201.36
02193 NORT~ZREST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRIfAt SUPPLIES 590.72
02305 PETTY CASN - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 25.15
02358 PRORA~ETY SALTY SUPPLIES 553.38
02464 ROSS VAL~E CO, INC VALVE KIT 525.80
05080 S~, ~ O~E~AXMEN~ 123.01
02722 ~l{I-S?A~ ~ECT~O~IC CORP ELECTRICA~ SUPPLIES ·60.62
REPORT: APBOARDRFT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN~ ~EDNREDAY JUN2800 17:18 PAGE 13
~5~RE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~SENTED TO TRE BOARD OF TRUSTEES REC~ JU~E t6 2000 TO J~ME 29 2000
DEPT VF~R NBR ~NDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AROUNT
02832 WAL-~T STORES, INC. MIST.SUPPLIES 644.85
02893 WOLF Ck'{ERA, INC. FILM PROCESSING 57.77
TOTAL : 28330.29
630
01620 A~ERICAN LANDSCAPING INC. LANDSCAPE 7397.00
02806 VILLAGE'OF MOUNT PROSPECT WATER/SE=~R t4.80
TOTAL : 7411.80
660
01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. MISC.BARDWARE 56.77
01169 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. R~PAIR PARTS 6.35
REPAIR PARTS 52.00
58.38
01187 AETNA TRUCK PARTS FLOOR MATS 172.80
01833 ANDE~ON LOCK CO, PREY MISC.NARDWARE 312.60
02108 AR.LIN~ON PO~ER EQUIBMENT HONDA ~L cap 27.30
02319 AUTO COLOR SUPPLIES 1052.95
02938 BOW~AR DISTRIBUTION CENT~ MISC.BARE~/~E SUPPLIES 1402.79
04424 BRETT EQUIPMENT STROBE kaNP 97.10
01006 BUESE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASH-MAY 2000 834.75
01045 CATCHING FLUID~R PARMER HYDRAULIC 73.71
HYDra,IT NOSE 376.15
SEUICE 88.80
538.66
01058 CE~T~Y LABS, INC SCRUBS/BRUSN 58.78
CLEARING BUPP 127.90
180.68
01236 DAVE & JIM'S AUTO BODY, INC. ~MEL ALIG~ 70.00
REPLACE CAMBE~/CA~TER BUSHING 52.50
122.50
05065 FMEEWAY ~ ~ ADA~T~ 173.73
03958 ~U~D INTEI~TION~ TR~CK REPAIR 4t4.42
01444 FRIES ANT~OTIVE TC'M {2783 95.00
REPORT: APROARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RON: WEDNESBAY JUN2800 17:18 PAGE 14
REL~SB ID :
VILL%GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 16 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENROR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AROUNT
01511 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES GOODYEAR TIRE 238.12
GOODYEAR TIRES 526.08
GOODYEAR TIRES 267.52
1031.72
01750 INTERSTATE BATTERY INTERSTATE BATTERY 143.90
01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. MISC.A~O REPAIR PARTS 1452.23
01914 LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. REPAIR TM-4 85.50
02018 MIDWAY TRUCK PARTS PARTS 20.39
02059 MORTON GROVE A~TOMOTIVE ~EST MISC.AUTO PARTS 500.00
MISC.A~O PARTS 165.00
665.00
02089 ~[0NICIPAL FLEET MANAGERS ASSOO PRESENTATION/MEET 75.00
02195 NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER ADA~ER ASSEMBLY 143.89
02648 P.R. STREICH & SUNS, INC. REPAIR 173.00
05048 RRAXAIR/GAS TECN STARGON T-BOTTLES GAS ~/CEANGE i58.79
02374 QUALITY DISCOUNT A~O PARTS MISC A~TO REPAIR PARTS 46.06
02585 SOURCE NORTH ~ERICA NEW VAPOR RECOVERY 155.00
02684 TELRACE SUPPLY COMPANY EXCHANGE CYLINDER 139.53
05063 UNION CITY BODY CO. WINDSHIELD GLASS 127.12
02769 U~TO~ ADTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 1353.98
AC DELCO REPAIR PARTS 90.73
AC DELCO REPAIR PARTS 841.38
2286.09
02782 VALVOLINE, INC. TRANSMISSION REUID 935.00
05059 WOOD DALE TEANSMISSION REBUILD TRANSMISSION 763.23
TUNAL : 13941.85
670
05060 BI-OOUN~Y SERVICE CENTER, INC. DIVE TRAILER 8697.00
04579 CUSTOM V~HICLK SYSTEMS, INC. INSTALL POLICE EQUIPMENT 2620.00
INSTALL ROLICE E~I?MENT 2453.50
5073.50
02525 SECRETARY OF STATE TITLE FOR 318 ' 75;00
SPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RD~i W~NNESDAY JUN2800 17:18 PAGE 15
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM ~ONE 16 2000 TO J~RE 29 2000
DE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE RESCRIFrION MOUNT
04951 SUBURBAN ACCENTS INC. LETTERING NEW PATROL CAPS 2200.00
02913 ZIENART RUSTPROOF 215.00
TOTAL 16260.50
690
05082 ~G/ANHC (12) WILLIAM BASS 4/9/00 99.00
01460 ART~R J. GALLAGBER RISK MGNT 4TH OF ~LY LIRB!LiTY iNS. 948.00
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. ENT OF INS. CLAIMS 9862.00
01236 DAVE & JIM'S AUTO BODY, ENC, REPAIR/REPAINT REAR BUMPER 323.20
TOTAL 11232.20
710
01027 CAPITAL GAINS INC. INVESTMENT MG~f~-J~NE 2192.46
02560 SKLO~WSKI,PUCRALSKI & REI~R LEGAL FEES 649.45
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 062600 850!.64
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL ~OR - 062600 16710.04
TOTAL 20053.59
720
01027 CAPITAL GAINS INC. INVESTMENT MOMT-JUME 2717.91
00120 VILLAGE OF MOUN~ PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 062700 8384.54
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUi~T PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 062700 13975.55
TOTAL : 25078.00
T30
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 062500 344.20
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL ~RBS PAYROLL FOR - 062500 200.00
TOTAL : 544.28
770
01405 FIRST CC~9~ON~W,~LTN ENP DENTAL PLAN 2801.30
TOTAL : 2801.30
790
05068 GANTt, ENEDERICK OVER~A~C:J~f 40.70
05069 GENC, ~ REFOND 150.00
~0111 INDIANA DER OF REVENUE IN.I]{CUME Y~X-J%~{ 126.07
05076 ' LAPINSKI, E. OVE~A~9{ZNT 01.40
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: WEDNESDAY JUN2800 i7:18 PAGE 16
WELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 16 2000 TO JUNE 29 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
05078 ' NATALIS, ~LORA COLLATERAL FOR TICKETS 100.00
02689 TEIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY 325.00
BOND MONEY 1500.80
BOND MONEY 1621.00
BOND MONEY 750~ 00
4196.00
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 062500 6592.54
DIREURSEME~ 9950.00
DISBURSEMENT 50.00
16592.54
04990 WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE WI INCOME TAX-JUNE 198.~0
TOTAL 21485.61
GRAND TOTAL 816184.38
GEWE~.TED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN! WEDNESDAY JUN2800 I7:18 PACE 17
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOU~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
F~O~ ~E 16 2000 TO J~NE 29 2000
Sb~{ARY BY FUND
001 GENEEA5 FUND 384973.94
050 MOTOR HEn TAX FUND 8936.23
070 CO~94]NITY DEV~LPM~T BL~K GR~T I3497.2i
170 RE~3ND 87B & 9la B&I 1993B 350.00
250 ~O~NTOWN REDEVLOPFNT B&I i993A 450.00
270 DO~N~ REDEVLOP}~T B&I 1996B 450.00
280 DOWETO~N REDEVL B & I 1998B 300.00
310 5~D CO~ROL B&I 1992A 150.00
320 RE~JNDING 5~D 9!A B&! !993B 75.00
330 5~D CONTROL B&I 1994A t50.00
340 5~D CO~ROL B&I 1996A 225.00
350 5~D CO~ROL - 1998A B & I I50.00
360 DO~O~ ~D~LOP 1998C B & I 300.00
380 EPa ~D LO~ B&I 19644.42
410 ST~ET ~PRO~ B&I 1994A 150.00
420 CAPIT~ IMPROVerS B&I 1996A 225.00
430 ST~ IWER~ B & I 1998A 150.00
510 CAPITAL IM~RO~ ~D 35613.91
550 ~ ~DULP~T CONST 38721.36
560 ST~ ~PKOV~ CONST ~ND 138510.28
590 ~D CO.EOn CONST ~D 18022.61
~10 ~TER ~D SE~R ~ND 28330.29
630 PA~ING SYST~ ~ENUE ~D 7411.80
660 ~HICLE ~INTEN~CE ~ND 13941.85
670 ~ICLE ~C~ ~D 16260.50
690 RISK ~AG~ ~ND 11232.20
710 POLICE PENSION ~D 28053.59
720 FI~ PENSION ~D 25078.00
730 BENEFIT TRUST ~2 ~D 544.28
770 ~C~P ~CROW ~D 2801.30
790 ESCROW DEPOSIT ~ND 21485.61
T~AL: 816184.38
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
13-Jul-00
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 07/01/00 to Per Attached Credits/ Balance
07101100 07/13/00 List of Bills Debits 07/13/00
General Fund 7,449,392 148,845 431,020 7,167,218
SPecial Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,557,471 48,225 283,410 1,322,286
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 1,492,875 7,108 1,485,767
Loca; Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 1,796 1,796
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 30,377 547 29,829
Debt Service Funds 3,756,113 795,444 2,960,669
Car)ital Pro_iect~ Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 2,560,081 1,386 2,558,695
Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 54,225 54,225
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 180,871 180,871
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 196,472 198,146 (1,674)
Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,268,332 37,781 4,306,113
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,719 4,719
Flood Control Construction Fund 3,043,441 12,261 3,031,180
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 3,006,249 225,035 343,486 2,887,797
Parking System Revenue Fund 704,081 3,904 707,985
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 205,107 13,221 191,886
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,115,303 8,959 5,106,345
Computer Replacement Fund 268,444 1,401 267,042
Risk Management Fund 3,285,647 9,579 122,848 3,172,377
Trust & Aqency Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,301,242 16,575 63 31,317,755
Fire Pension Fund 32,324,808 13,653 350 32,338,111
Flexcomp Trust Fund 4,130 8,839 2,852 10,117
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,503,476 33,356 36,572 1,500,260
Benefit Trust Funds 95,459 95,459
102,410,110 545,792 2,259,071 100,696,830
'REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JI3L1300 19:02 PAGE 1
RELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT FROSPECT
LIST OF DILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM JOLY 01 2000 TO JULY 13 2000
DEPT VENDOR NHR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
001
03901 3CMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 120.00
REGISTRATION FEE 300.00
420.00
ODD ACTIVE ak~ CONPAMY, INC. SERVICE 450.00
01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. GAS PIPE 203.16
01135 ADVANCED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. SERVICE AGREEMENT 600.00
01169 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. BAR&CHAIN OIL 79.51
01198 AGA GAS, INC. OXYGEN RENTAL 91.i3
01518 AMBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP., INC~ MAINTENANCE 802.02
01535 AMERICAN AR~ORIST SUPPLIES, IN SUPPLIES 103.99
01699 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC. SUPPLIES 37.00
01766 AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES 85.95
05082 AMG/AMNC (12) MEDICAL ~AMS 136.00
01830 ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO. REPAIRS 228.72
MAINTENANCE PASSENGER ELEVATOR i55.9S
MAINT~ANCE PASSENGER ELEVATOR 160.63
545.30
01833 ANDERSON LOCK CO~PAMY FILE CABINET i7.00
01840 ANDERSON PEST CONTROL AVITROL 66.25
05092 ANTONUCCI, ROCCO JR. REFUND 50.00
05096 ANDIZZONE, SUSAN REBATE 70.00
02802 A~INGTON HTS. FIRE ACADEMY REGISTRATION 425.00
REGISTRATION 375.00
800.00
02261 ASSOCIATED ATTRACTIONS ENT.INC 4TH OF JULY PARADE 400.00
02270 AT&T SEVICE 3.02
SEVICE 10.07
REVICE 20.14
SEVICE 10.07
SNVICE 38.26
SRVICE 10.07
SEVICE 15.10
SEVICE 26.18
SEVICE 8.06
'REPORT: APDO~DRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1300 15:02 PAGE 3
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOHNTPROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRO~JULY 01 2000 TO~LY 13 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
03938 DAVIDSMEYER BUS SERVICE, INC. BUS FOR S[~ER ADVENTURE 112.88
BUS FOR SU}~ER ADVENTU~ 1128.75
1241.63
00315 DAWSON, HENRY SUBSCRIPTION 47.00
01279 DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 374.00
MAINTEM~CE AGREEMENT 374.00
748.00
01328 EL-COR INDUSTRIES, INC. MISC.SHOP SUPPLIES 253.29
01344 EMFORE IMPRINTS SERVICE 140.00
01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS PHYSICAL EXEM 341.00
05101 F & C CONSTRUCTION INC. DUPLICATE PAYMENT 35.00
01369 FAIRVIEW PNINTINGSEMVICE CATALO~ ENVELOPES 741.00
00326 FARLEY, GEEXLD L. REIMBURSEMENT 238.91
01372 FAST REEXK, FRRE STYLE TEAM 4TN OF ~LT PAEXDE 400.00
01377 FEDE~5 EXPRESS CORP SCHIPPINGCHARGES 21.32
SCHIPPING CHARGES 22.82
SCHIPPING CHARGES 28.90
FEDERAL EXPRESS 11.44
AIRBILL 14.44
98.92
00329 FELL, J~DITH B. SUPPLIES 40.27
SUPPLIES 3.99
SUPPLIES 22.58
SUPPLIES 1.99
68.83
01396 FI~ FINDINGS LABS, LLC SUBSCRIPTION ~NEWAL 38.00
00102 FIRS PENSION ~ND PAYROLL FOR - 071300 13653.03
00332 F~DY, ~NNETH CL~HING ALLOW 150.00
01431 DSTER COACH SALES INC. 1 CL~K 35.00
01439 FRIED~ EISENSTEIN~EMER AND SCHWARTZ, LLP VIL~GE AUDIT 3600.00
01473 GEIB INDUSTRIES, INC. DORE ASSEMBLY ~535 TRUCK 81.21
05115 GLOVES INC. B~S ~PAI~D 361.39
01511 G~DYEAM SERVICE STO~ES ~EXIR 3 PLAT TIRES 47.97
~,EPORT: APBOARDNVT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1300 15:02 PAGE 5
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRO~JULY 01 2000 TO JULY 13 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
05032 KLEHM NURSERY TREES 1912.00
TREES 400.00
2312.00
05117 KURAR, JIM EXPENSES 15.00
01852 LANRE, ALAN L. PICTURE FRAMES 28.00
01858 LANE-COOKLAND SURVEY SURVEY 240.00
05087 LONG ISLAND PRODUCTION INC. VIDEO TAPE 114.95
01918 LUNUSTRC~'S NURSERY LANDSCAPE MAINT~MCE 1350.00
04014 ~ILBOXES ETC. MAILING 55.64
04999 MANN, CHERYL REIMB CDL 50.00
04974 MCFADDEn, MAGGIE REIMBUREANEET FOR CDL 50.00
01979 MCI WIRELESS SERVICE 58.10
RADIO MINT. 145.35
PHONE SERVICE 6.09
209,54
02241 NULEOD USA/ONE STOP CO~R~iUUICATIONS SERVICE 30.56
SERVICE I01.86
SERVICE 203.72
SERVICE 101,06
SERVICE 387.05
SERVICE 101.86
SERVICE 152.78
SERVICE 264.83 ·
SERVICE 81.48
SERVICE 81.48
SERVICE 366.68
SERVICE 2067.67
SERVICE 2026.93
SERVICE 1303.75
SERVICE 426.90
SERVICE 377.98
8077,39
00116 METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 071300 715.00
00117 METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 071300 846.00
05113 MIFFLIMVALLEY INC. FIRE SAFETY EDUCATIOU 806.19
02020 MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS PLAQUE 103.23
02046 MOBILE PRINT INC. SERVICE 96.00
BUSINESS CARDS 36.00
'REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 EUN: THURSDAY JUL1300 i5:02 PAGE 7
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JULY 01 2000 TO JULY i3 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION
1049.19
00123 PEBSCO PAYROLL FOR- 071300 16920.48
02285 PEDE~EN & HOUPT TRANSFER TAX TRANSACTION 140.00
02301 PETTY CASE - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXEENSES 100.00
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL/SUPP 5.85
TRAVEL/SUPP 181.56
187.4i
05119 PHOENIX IRRIGATION REPL SPRINKLER HEADS 250.13
00124 POLICE PENSION FOND PAYROLL FOR - 071000 73.67
PAYROLL FOR - 071300 16501.27
16574.94
04921 POPE, ELIZABETH A. PAYROLL FOR - 071300 923.00
02334 POSTI~APTER POSTAGE STAMPS 330.00
02350 PRORAFETY SUPPLIES 202.82
02396 RAY,RE OFFICE PROD & ~RN ST~P/SUNPLIES 34.50
OFFICE SBPPLIES 466.79
501.29
02433 RICREE, JEFFREY ~PENSES 29.68
EXPENSES 42.59
72.27
02008 ROGNR~EYEH ~ SON ~TL HAULINH/SNEEPINGS 1470.00
~TL HANLING/SNEEPINGS 1058.48
~TL HAULING/S~EPINGS 2103.11
4631.59
00418 ROSCOP, WlLLI~ REINBURRE EXPENSES 220.99
02467 ROUSE-RANDNURST SHOP CENT,INC. REM-JULY 2000.00
04673 SAN BHRNANDINO COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS PAYROLL FOR - 071300 211.05
05114 SCREEN~CHINN RICRO~ESH HATS 480.00
02525 SECRETARY OF PTATE LICENSE PLATE RENEWALS 380.00
00125 SEIU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 071300 484.50
02536 SEVEHTEEN SPECIALTIES INC. NANE BADGES 177.78
00441 STRAHL, DAVID ADVANCE FOR IC~ CONFERENCE 905.18
'REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: S NOV 99 15:50 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1300 i5:02 PAGE 9
~LEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT VEOSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JULY 01 2000 TO JULY 13 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOONT
7770.00
02836 WLI INDUSTRIES, INC. BARRICADES 707.25
02893 WOLF CAMERA, INC. PHOTO PROCESSING 103.20
PHOTO PROCESSING 71.50
i74.70
02896 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO SERVICES 720.00
00464 WULBECKRE, JEFFREY SUPERSTAR VOLLEYBALL 100.00
TOTAL 431019.60
030
01639 AMERICAN NATIONAL RANK TIPPING FEES 73094.12
FIXED COSTS 41597.20
114691.32
02016 ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY REFUSE DISPOSAL 49250.50
REFUSE DISPOSAL 20365.72
REFUSE DISPOSAL 31112.45
REFUSE DISPOSAL 2922.82
REFUSE DISPOSAL 10192.01
REFUSE DISPOSAL 8850.96
REFUSE DISPOSAL 43056.34
165758.80
02270 AT&T SEVICE 4.03
02241 MCLEOD USA/ONE STOP CO~iUNZCATIONS SERVICE 40.74
02406 RENRIG PACIFIC COMPANY RECYCLING BINS 2915.00
TOTAL 283409.89
O5O
01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. MAINT CONT 500.00
02367 PSI MATERIAL TESTING 6608.00
TOTAL 7108.00
07O
03938 DAVIDSMEYER BUS SERVICE, INC. BUS ~OR Sb%~IRE ADVEWTREE 112.87
01421 FOLEY, APRIL B. MENTOR PROMRAM SUPPLIES 34.22
01439 ~RIEDMAN EISENSTEIN RA~ER AND SCHWARTZ, ALP SINGLE AUDIT 400.00
TOTAL 547.09
290
'REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1300 15:02 PAGE 11
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PtOHPEC?
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM J~LY 01 2000 TO OULY 13 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01211 CUES, INC. PARTS & BULBS 516.08
05047 ELGIN SWEEPING SERVICES, INC. CONTRACTUAL CLEANING 7795.00
02371 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENG.INC. IMPROVEMENTS 1670.00
01439 F~IED~N EISENSTEIN RA~ER AND SCHWARTZ, LLP ~ S AUDIT 3600.00
05103 RA~4ER, KENNETH REFUND 26.80
REFUND 2.80
29.60
01559 H~SEN INFO~TION TECHNOLOGY ~INT.AG~EMENT SERVICE FEE 9233.86
01544 HBK WATER METER SERVICE LABOR & ~TERIALS/WATER METERS 5943.75
LABOR & MATERIAL/WATER METERS 2694.00
LABOR ~TERIALS WATER METE~ 793.51
9431.26
01759 J & L ENTERPRISE TOOL 573.25
01427 JOSEPH D. FOdeN & CO. PARTS 1830.32
05105 ~LECKI, WANDA RE,ND 29.07
~ND 3.06
32.13
02241 MCLEOD USA/ONE STOP CO~NICATIONS SEUICE 2719.55
SERVICE 1656.76
4376.31
02042 NINUTE~N P~SS 5ETTERH~D 840.00
05116 M~ION IND. INC. DODGE BUSHING 119.52
02358 PDSA~TY SUPPLIES 202.83
02008 R~ER MEYER & SON ~TL HAULING/SWEEPINGS 1757.86
~TL HAULING/SWEEPINGS 1977.28
~TL HAULING/SWEEPINGS 1200.00
4935.14
05108 SCHREINER, EDWARD SEWER 0.58
RE,ND WATER 5.85
6.43
05109 SHILLINGTON, ALE~NDER RE,ND 10.90
REFUND 1.09
11.99
REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUL1300 15:02 PAGE 13
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF PILLS PRESENTED TO THE POAKD OF TRUSTEES FROM JULY 01 2000 TO JULY 13 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~ INVOICE DESCRIPTION t~OUNT
02684 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY GAS CYLINDER RENTAL 4.82
04472 TEXORPETROAEOMCO PREMIER DIESEL 8728.15
02769 UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY NOSE ASS~PLY 31.36
05004 VWNIZOM WIRELESS PAGING SERVICE 45.01
TOTAL : 13220.61
670
01187 AETNA TRUCK PARTS FLOOR,TS 233.76
04579 CUSTOM VENICLE SYSTEMS, INC. INSTALL POLICE EQUIPMENT 4923.50
INSTALL POLICE EQUIPMENT 2453.50
7377.00
02393 RAY O'HERROMCO.,INC. PRO GARD 1348.00
TOTAL : 8958.76
680
01049 CDW GOVERRMENT, INC COMP SUPP 1401.28
TOTAL I401.28
690
01199 COWHEY GU~NDSOM LEDER,LTD TREE RISK ASSESSMENT 195.00
TREE RISK ASSESSMENT 195.00
390.00
01306 DRUG CARD, INC. PRESCRIPTION CARD CLAIMS 13221.07
01966 ~RTIN BOYER COMPA~Y, INC WORKERS COMP ADM. 2060.00
WO~KWNS COMP-WAGNER 101565.60
WN~RA COMP EXPENSES 5611.05
109236.65
TOTAL 122847.72
710
02565 SKLOMOWSKI,PUCHALSKI & KEIMER LEGAL FEES 62.50
TOTAL 62.50
720
05085 VATZ, KENNETH EXA~-M.KLEES 350.00
TOTAL 350.00
770
01405 FIRST CO59{ONWNALTH EMP DENTAL PLAN 2851.66
TOTAL 2851.66
RENE~TED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THUP~SDAY JULiS00 15:02 PAGE i5
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM JULY O1 2000 TO JULY 13 2000
Sb%~ARY BY FUND
001 RENE~5 FUND 431019.68
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 283409.89
050 MOTOR F~EL TAX FUND 7108.00
070 COi~UNITY DEVELP~T BLOCK GRNT 547.09
290 DO~TO~ ~DEV5 B & I 1999 795443.75
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 1385.68
550 DO~TO~ REDEVLP~T CONST 198145.62
580 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 12260.86
610 WATER A~D SEWER FUND 343486.23
660 VEHICLE MAINTEN~CE FUND 13220.61
670 VEHICLE R£PLACEMENT FUND 8958.76
680 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 1401.28
690 RISK MA~AGL~ENT FUND 122847.72
710 POLICE PENSION FUND 62.50
720 FIRE PENSION FUND 350.00
770 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 2851.66
790 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 36572.09
TOTAL: 2259071.42
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET REVENUE
AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES
January 1 - June 30, 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months { 50.0% ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
Budget Revenue Summary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
REVENUE BY CLASSIFICATION
PROPERTY TAXES 6,414 4,631,302 9,752,255 5,120,953 52.5
OTHER T~XES 1,222~774 8,445,876 16,475,226 8,029~350 48.7
~ICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 177,306 2,192,144 2,987,400 795,256 26.6
INTERGOVERM~NT REV. 588,385 3,743,476 8,269,200 4,525,724 54.7
CHARGES FOR SERVICE 1,037,631 5,608,547 12,179,620 6,571,073 54.0
FINES AND FORFEITS 54,066 242,081 531,500 289,419 54.5
INVESTMENT INCOME 274,731 2,929,849 4,948,162 2,018,313 40.8
REIMBURSEMENTS 45,010 1,980,980 788.300 -1,192,680 -15~.3
OT~ER REVEN~E - 161,393 1,544,130 2,893,985 1,349,625 46.6
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 2,165,000 2,832,146 5,136,500 2,304,354 44.9
Total All F~ds 5,782,710 34,150,531 63,962,118 29,811,587 46.6
07~2~2000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 80.0%) completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~s:so:o~ Budget Revenue Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
SSA #7 W~ITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUNqD 1,~%2,651 2,274,222 3,156,850 882,628 28.0
WATER AND SEWER FUND 528,914 3,235,127 7,599,200 4,364,073 57.4
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 19,895 107,080 216,900 109,820 50.6
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 93,113 556,101 1,110,393 554,291 49.9
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 111,872 966,652 1,082,981 516,329 47.7
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 11,733 63,958 121,733 57,775 47.5
RISK M3%NAGEMENT FUND 310,470 2,644,847 3,415,394 770,847 22.6
POLICE PENSION FUND 44,861 1,516,707 2,777,520 1,260,813 45.4
FIRE PENSION FUND 52,828 1,417,200 2,812,560 1,395,360 49.6
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND 815 2,937 6,000 3,063 51.1
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 0 0 0 0
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 4,627 4,627 0 -4,627
SSA ~1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 71 393 0 -393
SSA ~6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 542 20,876 39,125 18,249 46.6
SSA #7 W~ITB OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Total All Funds 5,732,710 34,150,831 63,962,118 29,811,587 46.6
07/12/2000 ~ 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
15:52:07 6 Months { 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
GENERAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES -33,418 3,142,268 6,685,955 3,943,689 53.0
41 OTHER TAXES 853,192 5,119,458 9,994,800 4,835,342 48.6
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 172,141 1,998,119 2,750,500 752,381 27.4
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 457,767 2,727,018 5,000,800 2,273,782 45.5
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 41,602 324,198 600,920 276,722 46.0
45 FINES AND FORFEITS 54,086 242,081 531,500 289,419 54.5
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 53,142 231,913 360,000 128,087 35.6
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 44,427 159,089 275,300 116,211 42.2
48 OTHER REVENUE 4,658 147,989 155,478 7,486 4.8
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
GENERAL FU~D 1,647,577 14,092,131 28,315,250 12,223,119 46.4
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 39,832 1,180,895 2,419,300 1,238,405 51.2
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 88,726 435,104 791,700 356,596 45.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 9,115 40,562 50,000 9,438 18.9
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 137,673 1,656,561 3,261,000 1,604,439 49.2
FUEL TAX FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 130,618 762,400 1,380,700 618,300 44.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 9,032 26,139 40,000 13,861 34.7
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 910,237 0 -910,257
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 139,650 1,698,776 1,420,700 -278,076 -19.6
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
is:s~:o~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUMo21 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Salance Percent
TOTAL LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK ORA~T 1996 0 0 0 0
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I L987A
40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 23,034 48,000 24,966 52.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 264 1,412 1.046 -366 -35.0
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 264 24,446 49,046 24,600 50.2
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTE B&I 19878
40 PROPERTY TAXES [ 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY 8&I 19878 0 0 0 0
POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A
40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&! 1991A 0 0 0 0
REFUND 878 & 91A B&I 19938
40 PROPERTY ?AXES 0 285 107 599,000 313,893 52.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 5,036 13.899 22 089 8,190 37.1
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTALREFUND 878 & 9lA B&I 19938 5,036 299,006 621,089 322,083 51.9
DOWNTOWN EEDEVLOPMNT B&I 19928
41 OTRER TAXES 0 ¢ 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOT~tLDOWNTOWN REDElrLOP~qT B&I 19928 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 195,997 340,000 144,003 42.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 4 918 13,181 15,390 2,209 14.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 4~918 209.178 355,390 146,212 41.1
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&] 19948
41 OTMER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTA~DO~NTOWN REDEVL~PNNT B&I 19948 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 19968
41 OTRER TAXES 0 72.518 125,000 52,482 42.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,186 2,860 2,332 -528 -22.6
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
15:22:07 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
· SUMO21 Budget Revenue by CategOrY within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 2,326 4,000 1,674 41.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 11 82 95 13 13.7
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 11 2,408 4,095 1,687 41.2
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999
41 OTHER T~-XES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 7,803 24,922 39,406 14,484 36.8
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 500,000 500,000 100.0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 7,603 24,922 539,406 514,484 95.4
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A
41 OTHER TAXES 17,388 110,408 200,510 90,102 44.9
48 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,787 4,518 10,087 5,569 55.2
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 19,175 114,926 210,597 95,671 45.4
REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B
41 OTHER TAXES ~ 23,414 148,671 270,000 121,329 44.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,195 9,872 12,426 6,554 52.7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993B 25,609 154,543 282,426 127,883 45.3
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 14,725 93,498 169,800 76,302 44.9
46 INVHSTMENT INCOME 1,096 2,768 6,370 3,602 56.5
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 15,821 96,266 176,170 79,904 45.4
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 17,951 113,981 207,000 93,019 44.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,128 2,925 6,958 4,033 58.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 19,079 116,906 213,958 97,052 45.4
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & i 41 OTHER TAXES 5,637 35,791 65,000 29,209 44.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 84 308 1 024 716 69.9
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 5,721 26,099 66,024 29,925 45.3
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
15:52:08 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM02I Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Smm'aary
01/01/00 - 06/30~00
Cur MO Y-T~D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 87,686 I52,800 64,914 42.5
46 INArESTMENT INCOME 874 2,204 748 -1,458 -194.7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 874 89,890 153,348 63,458 41.4
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 42, 926 272,564 495,000 222,436 44.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 300 4,809 7,565 2,756 36.4
TOTAL EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 43,226 277,373 802,565 225,192 44.8
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I
46 INIrESTMENT INCOME 338 338 6,000 5,662 94.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 261,959 261,959 238,150 -23,809 -10.0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 262,297 262,297 244,150 -18,147 -7.4
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TA/fES 44, 969 285,533 510,000 224,467 44.0
48 INVESTMENT INCOME 5,361 14,414 28,851 14,437 50.0
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 50,330 299,947 838,851 238,904 44.3
CAPIT~-L IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 9,523 60,466 108,000 47,534 44.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,134 3,003 6,034 3,03t 50.2
TOTAL C~ITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 10,657 63,469 114,034 50,565 44.3
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A
41 OTNER TAXES 13,491 85,660 153,000 67,340 44.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 58 699 741 42 5.7
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTA~STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 13,549 86,359 153,741 67,382 43.8
STREET IMPROV CONSTH 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
'CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
43 INTERG~VERMENT REV. 0 50,000 380,000 330,000 86.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 18,199 64,167 45,000 -19,167 -42.6
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
48 OTBER RElrEs~JE 13,500 13,500 135,000 121,500 90.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 512,000 1,024,000 512,000 50.0
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
15:~2:08 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
su~021 Budget Revenue by Categoz~ Within Fund Su~-~ary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 81,699 639,667 1,584,000 944,333 59.6
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
46 I~7VBSTMENT INCOME 274 1,515 0 -1,515
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 274 1,515 0 -1,515
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 918 4,604 0 -4,604
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONET FUND 918 4,604 0 -4,604
DOWNTOWN RSDBVLPWNT CONST 1998
46 iNVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST
41 OTHER TAXES 0 42,733 73,491 30,758 41.9
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 0 0 0 0
43 INTBRGOVERMBNT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,332 24,293 40,000 15,707 39.3
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 450,000 450,000 100.0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 1,387,800 1,387,500 100.0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1,332 67,026 1,950,991 1,883,965 96.6
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 153,661 950,795 2,063,600 1,112,805 58.9
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 5,165 192,825 233,000 40,175 17.2
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 36,680 112,007 75,000 -37,007 -49.3
49 OTHER FINANCING SOUROES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 195,506 1,255,627 2,371,600 1,115,973 47.1
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 22 125 0 -125
49 OTBER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 22 125 0 -125
~SA #4 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
15:52:08 6 Months { 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 200,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 83.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 9,610 31,275 30,000 -1,275 -4.3
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1,903,041 2,042,947 1,926,850 -116,097 -6.0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FO-RD 1,912,651 2,274,222 3,156,850 882,628 28.0
WATER A~D SEWER FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 25,541 747,905 1,545,300 797,395 51.6
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 488,267 2,388,437 5,869,900 3,481,463 59.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 14,724 79, 995 I75,000 95,005 54.3
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 3,000 3,000 100.0
48 OTHER REVENUE 382 18,790 6,000 -12,790 -213.2
49 OTRER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL WATER ~ 8EWER FUND 528,914 3,235,127 7,599,200 4,364,073 57.4
PARRING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 0 1,200 3,900 2,700 69.2
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 14,235 86,566 178,000 91,434 51.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 5,660 19,314 35,000 15,686 44.8
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 19,895 107,080 216,900 109,820 50.6
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 92,035 852,196 1,104,392 552,196 50.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,078 3,905 6,000 2,095 34.9
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 '0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 93,113 556~101 1,110,392 554,291 49.9
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
44 C}{ARGES FOR SERVICE 68,583 411,491 822,981 411,490 50.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 43,289 139,921 200,000 60,079 30.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 15,240 60,000 44,760 74.6
TOTAL VENICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 111,872 566,652 1,082,981 516,329 47.7
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 9.478 56,867 113 733 56,866 50.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,255 - 091 8.000 909 11.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~:~:o8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUM02~ Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( S0.0% ) Completed
15:52:0s 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~
su~0~l Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Su~nary
Ol/Ol/OO - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Undeceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL SEA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARy FUND
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
o7/~2/2ooo VILLAGE OF M°UNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0%) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
~s:49~7 Budget Expenditure Sulumary
o /o /oo o / o/oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
EXPENDITURE BY C~ASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES 1,288,607 8,431,739 17,979,196 9,547,457 53.1
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 248,990 2,288,049 4,729,690 2,437,641 51.6
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 15,477 104,398 312,205 207,807 66.6
PENSION BBNEFITS 269,737 1,627,119 3,261,465 1,634,350 60.1
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 955,838 5,331,281 12,441,419 7,110,138 57.1
UTILITIES 16,855 129,840 436,029 306,689 70.3
INSUPJtWCE 377,782 2,710,444 3,408,574 698,130 20.5
COMMODITIBS& SUPPLIES 101,836 552,952 1,298,220 745,268
OTHER EXPBNDIT~RBS 76,260 907,943 1,643,304 735,361 44.7
LAND IMPROVEMENTS 0 27,673 190,000 162,327 86.4
BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 2,919 23,924 143,000 119,076 83.3
, OFFICE EQUIPMENT 9,329 90,573 334,483 243,910 72.9
MOBILE EQUIPMENT 42,549 286,532 838,800 552,268 65.8
OTNER EQUIPMENT 62,247 235,436 613,987 378,581 61.7
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 2,850 9,150 803,628 794,478 98.9
INFRASTRUCTURE 414,302 1,114,872 9,165,939 8,051,067 87.8
BON~ PRINCIPAL 12,528 249,074 3,838,966 3,589,892 93.5
INTEREST EXPENSE 3,399 714,475 1,342,268 627,793 46.8
BANK AND FISCAL FEES 3,125 3,425 11,480 8,055 70.2
INTBRFUND TR/~SFERS 0 512,000 1,024,000 512,000 50.0
Total All FUnds 3,906,630 25,350,395 63,812,653 38,462,258 60.3
EXPENDITURE BY FUND
GENERAL FUND 1,860,471 12,549~693 26,868,836 14,319,143 53.3
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 169,745 1,424,080 3,228,956 1,804,876 55.9
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 137,179 813,799 1,434,520 620,721 43.3
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 9,025 9,905 8,833 -1,072 -12.1
COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GP~NT 29,211 91,195 290,869 199,674 68.6
ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 0 0
.LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRA~T 1996 · 0 0 0 0
pUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 0 125,000 47,000 -78,000 -166.0
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B 0 0 0 0
POLICE & FIRE BI/)G B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 350 72,192 656,785 584,593 89.0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPF~T B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
DO~NTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 450 30,034 410,167 380,133 92.7
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN RED~VLOPMNT B&I 1996B 450 9,256 143,514 134,2S8 93.6
DOWNTOWN RED~VL B & I 1998B 300 2,344 4 588 2,244 48.9
DOWNTOWN RBDBVL B & I 1999 0 165,744 962 388 796,644 82.5
FL4DOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 180 8,925 343.200 334,275 97.4
REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1992B 75 33,961 307.502 273,541 89.0
FLOOD CONTROL B&~ 1994A 150 17.980 186,160 168,180 90.3
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 228 26 848 213,748 186,900 87.4
FL4DOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 150 9 204 63,710 54,506 8S.6
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 300 26,472 153.344 126,872 82.7
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 19,644 319.036 613.227 294,191 48.0
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I -3,717 -3,717 60,538 64,256 106.1
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 150 59,026 618,254 559,228 90.5
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Mo~th~ ( 90.0~ ) Completed
6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I I996A 225 6,291 157,634 181,343 96.0
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 150 51,300 102,900 51,600 50.1
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 72,472 249,333 1,771,653 1,522,320 85.9
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 82,030 52,030 100.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 1,648 13,890 12,202 88.1
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 60,507 943,420 2,116,000 1,172,580 58.4
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 212,259 286,326 2,929,717 2,673,391 91~3
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
SSA ~7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 28,163 75,942 3,301,117 3,225,175 97.7
WATER AND SEWER FUND ~35,395 2,863,370 7,998,218 5,134,848 64.2
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 20,103 88,151 274,851 186,400 67.9
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 83,129 489,337 1,103,331 613,994 55.6
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 42,549 286,532 8~8,800 552,268 65.8
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 0 34,112 36,250 2,138 5.9
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 357,229 2,588,381 3,213,743 625,362 19.5
POLICE PENSION FUND 132,431 779,118 1,699,730 920,615 54.2
FIRE PENSION FUND 132,817 821,722 1,513,035 691,313 45.7
BENEFIT TRUST ~2 FUND 2,893 17,360 34,800 17,440 50.1
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 0 7,078 39,155 32,077 81.9
SSA ~7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Total All Funds 3,904,630 25,350,595 63,812,653 38,462,258 60.3
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
M~T~..vv..-- PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
VILLAGE
OF
FRRDBR01
SUMo31 Department Budget EXPenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 12,513 55,979 87,842 31,863 36.3
03 ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS 1,304 7,065 14,760 7,695 52.1
Totals 13,817 63,044 102,602 39,558 38.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,451 14,865 29,130 14,265 49.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 332 2,196 4,174 1,978 47.4
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 0 200 200 100.0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,387 43,519 58,888 16,369 26.1
55 UTILITIES 30 196 410 214 52.2
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 617 2,268 9,800 7,532 76.9
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
Totals 13,817 63,044 102,602 39,558 38.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FU~D 13,817 63,044 102,602 39,558 38.6
Totals 13,817 63,044 102,602 39,558 38.6
07/12/200Q 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~:~:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Sll..mmary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE MANAGER' S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE 27,210 170,487 332,054 161,567 48.7
02 LEGAL SERVICES 63,523 121,433 255,000 133,567 52.4
03 PERSOS/NEL SERVICES 14,730 29,979 96,877 66,898 69.1
04 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 7,425 60,821 187,082 126,261 67.5
05 PUBLIC INFORMATION 20,616 89,331 131,209 41,878 31.9
Totals 133,504 472,051 1,002,222 530,171 52.9
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
iS:si:28 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ Months( 50.0% ) Remaining
FR~DBR01
SUS03i Department Budget Expenditure Sualxnary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y~T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
TV SERVICES DIVISION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 TELEVISION SERVICES 11,822 99,785 193,184 93,399 48.3
03 OTHER SERVICES 0 0 5,000 5,000 100.0
Totals 11,822 99,785 198,184 98,399 49.7
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~:s~:28 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 ~ 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE CLERK' S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
ls:¥:~8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department BudgetEXPenditure Suammary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
FINANCE DEPARTMENT EXpended EXpended Budget Balance Percent
01 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 13,736 110,502 216,415 105, 913 48.9
03 DATA PROCESSING 11,742 104,740 197,931 93,191 47.1
04 DUPLICATING SERVICES 1,770 5,620 11,300 5,680 50.3
06 CUSTOMER SERVICES 22,612 165,820 307,023 141,203 46.0
Totals 90,392 642,481 1,257,156 614,675 48.9
50 PERSONAL SERVICSS 50,953 372,924 717,073 344,149 48.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,609 95,660 190,256 94,596 49.7
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 912 1,900 988 52.0
Totals 90,392 642,481 1,257,156 614,675 48.9
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 90,392 642,481 1,257,156 614,675 48.9
Totals 90,392 642,481 1,257,156 614,675 48.9
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
is:5i:29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ Months ( S0.0% > ~ini~
FRRDBR01
SUMO31 Department Bud~l'et Expenditure Summary
o~/ol/oo - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COMZ~[SNITY DEVELOPMENT Expended Expe:ded Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
15:~1:29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
su~081 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PRO~RAMTOTALS
04 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 720 6,052 18,169 12,117 66.7
08 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 1,865 14,697 96,155 81,458 84.7
06 ACCESSIBLTY & NEIGHBRHD IMPRV 0 0 50,000 50,000 100.0
07 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHAB 26,626 70,446 126,545 56,099 44.3
Totals 29,211 91,195 290,869 199,674 68.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 502 3,247 11,023 7,776 70.5
51 BMPLOYBB BENEFITS 72 1,730 2,546 816 32.1
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 608 1,000 392 39.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,011 18,141 98,485 83,314 84.6
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 23 1,300 1,277 98.2
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 26,626 70,446 126,545 56,099 44.3
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 50,000 50,000 100.0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 0 0
72 INTEREST EXPENSE 0 0 0 0
Totals 29,211 91,195 290,869 199,674 68.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
070 COMMUNITY DEVBLPMNT BLOCK GRIST 29,211 91,195 290,869 199,674 68.6
Totals 29,211 91,195 290,869 199,674 68.6
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~s:s~:29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM0~i Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
HUMAN SERVICES Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~s:s~:~ VILLAGE OF ~OUNT PROSPECT 8 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budgeg Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
POLICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 62,432 846,289 1,748,643 902,354 51.6
02 PATROL & TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 412,712 2,575,874 5,487,046 2,911,172 53.1
03 CRIME PREVTN & PUBLIC SERVICES 13,783 89,827 208,738 118,911 57.0
04 INVESTIGATIVE & JUVENILE PRGM 72,977 460,114 972,i65 512,051 52.7
05 CROSSING GUARDS 990 11,587 22,756 11,169 49.1
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 49,888 327,582 655,879 328,297 50.1
Totals 612,752 4,311,273 9,095,227 4,783,954 52.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 431,382 2,856,159 6,151,490 3,295,381 53.6
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 59,810 746,848 1,549,345 802,497 81.8
82 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 2,320 24,995 76,000 51,005 67.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 86,176 598,539 1,159,450 565,911 48.8
55 UTILITIES 4,993 21,771 40,750 18,979 46.6
57 CO~940DITIES & SUPPLIES 18,696 40,467 81,350 40,883 50.3
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 9,025 26,280 24,833 -1,447 -5.8
67 OTNEB EQUIPMENT 350 1,214 12,009 10,795 89.9
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 612,752 4,311,273 9,095,227 4,783,954 52.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUA~D 603,727 4,301,368 9,086,894 4,785,026 52.7
060 I~W ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GP~T 9,025 9,905 8,833 -1,072 -12.1
090 LOCAL L~W ENF BLOCK GP3%NT 1996 0 0 0 0
Totals 612,752 4,311,273 9,095,227 4,783,954 52.6
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~$:5~:29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months { 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM0~ Department Budget Expenditure Sun. nary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T~D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
FIRE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
:~T?'~T~'~,.,v~,,__ PROSPECT ~ Months ( S0.0% ) Remaining
VILLAGE
OF
FRRDBR01
SUM0~ Department Budget EXPenditure Summary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~s:s~:29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR0t
SUM081 Department Budget Expenditure Su..nmlary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/BLDGS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGPJ~4 TOTALS
01 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION 6,841 56,598 121,218 64,620 53.3
02 MAINTENANCE - PUBLIC BUILDINGS 38,775 338,593 654,963 316,370 48.3
04 STREET MAINTENANCE 54,534 166,597 486,569 319,972 65.8
05 SNOW REMOVAL 7,788 235,385 304,238 68,853 22.6
06 LEAF REMOVAL 2,633 18,236 150,971 132,735 87.9
07 STORM SEWER & BASIN MAINT 4,066 16,161 143,071 126,910 88.7
08 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS 4,756 49,856 58,135 8,279 14.8
09 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 8,568 50,621 93,946 43,325 46.1
11 P~RKING LOT MAINTENANCE 20,103 88,151 274,551 186,400 67.9
Totals 148,064 1,020,198 2,287,662 1,267,464 55.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 76,466 569,847 989,948 420,101 42.4
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 20,420 128,059 239,062 111,003 46.4
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,873 143,885 390,591 246,706 63.2
55 UTILITIES 0 6,505 15,550 9,045 58.2
56 INSUR3~NCE 514 3,082 6,166 8,084 50.0
57 CO~40DITIEB & SUPPLIES 7,594 160,557 303,940 143,383 47.2
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 10,300 10,300 100.0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 28,197 8,263 332,105 323,842 97.5
Totals 148,064 1,020,198 2,887,662 1,267,464 55.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 127,961 858,228 1,852,111 993,883 53.7
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 0 73,819 161,000 87,181 54.1
630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FU~D 20,103 88,151 274,551 186,400 67.9
Totals 148,064 1,020,198 2,287,662 1,267,464 55.4
07/12/2000 ~' 8 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~5:s~:29 VILLAGE ~.-m~ ~T~......~..~ PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
SUM031 Department BudgetEXPenditure Sua~nary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GRNDS Expended Expended B:dget Balance Percent
PRO~PJUMTOTALS
01 FORESTRY DIVISION ADMIN 11,176 71,315 162,167 90,852 56.0
02 MAINTENANCE OF GROUND 36,671 115,600 297,309 181,709 61.1
03 FORESTRY FROGP~AM 75,627 251,410 531,257 379,847 60.2
04 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION 7, 951 12,700 48, 599 35,899 73.9
Totals 131,425 481,025 1,139,382 688,307 60.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51,161 254,734 580,864 326,130 56.1
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,926 70,721 145,568 74,847 51.4
52 OTEER EMPLOYEE COSTS 79 1,016 1,240 224 18.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 56,522 105,433 362,270 256,837 70.9
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 11,737 19,121 37,960 18,839 49.6
66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 11,430 11,430 100.0
Totals 131,425 451,025 1,139,332 688,307 60.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 131,425 451,025 1,129,432 678,407 60.1
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 0 0 9,900 9,900 100.0
Totals 131,425 451,028 1,139,332 688,307 60.4
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~s:s~:29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 ENGINEERING SERVICES 38,957 245,705 586,810 341,105 58.1
05 TRAFFIC CNTRL & STREET LGNTNG 5,468 68,027 413,643 345,616 83.6
Totals 44,425 313,732 1,000,453 686,721 68.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 32,452 196,782 453,293 256,511 56.6
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8,049 50,082 109,659 59,577 54.3
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 3,237 5,400 2,163 40.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,447 38,641 156,361 117,720 75.3
55 UTILITIES 0 19,913 160,530 140,617 87.6
97 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 477 5,077 14,110 9,033 64.0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 4,000 4,000 100.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 2,100 2,100 100.0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 95,000 95,000 100.0
Totals 44;425 313,792 1,000,453 686,721 68.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 44,425 301,056 798,453 497,397 62.3
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 0 t2,676 202,000 189,324 93.7
Totals 44,425 313,732 1,000,453 686,721 68.6
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~ntmT.-...v.. PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
VILLAGE
OF
FR~DBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Suam%ary
ol/ol/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEWER Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~8:8~:~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months { 80.0~ > Remaln±ng
FRRDBR01 ·
SUM031 Department Bud~l'et Expenditure Su._r~ary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROORAMTOTALS
01 REFUSE DISPOSAL PROGRAM 169,745 1,424,080 3,228,956 1,804,876 55.9
Totals 169,745 1,424,080 3,228,956 1,804,876 55.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 7,565 29,742 65,687 35,945 54.7
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,610 8,596 18,661 10,065 53.9
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 150 880 730 83.0
54 CONTR3~CTUAL SERVICES 159,738 1,381,877 3,134,783 1,752,906 55.9
55 UTILITIES 40 259 464 205 44.2
56 INSUP~CE 198 1,193 2,381 1,188 49.9
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 594 2,263 6,100 3,837 62.9
Totals 169,745 1,424,080 3,228,956 1,804,876 55.9
SOURCE OF FUNDS
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 169,745 1,424,080 3,228,956 1,804,876 55.9
Totals 169,745 1,424,080 3,228,956 1,804,876 55.9
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~5:s~:~o VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Mo~ths ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FR~DBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended UneXpended
PUBLIC WORKS - VEHICLE MAINT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VEHICLE DIVISION ADMINSTRATION 9,557 68,711 149,357 80,646 54.0
02 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 73,572 420,626 953,974 533,348 55.9
Totals 83,129 489,337 1,108,331 613,994 55.6
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 37,386 241,111 518,788 277,677 53.5
51 BMPLOYEB BENEFITS 11,300 71,027 145,043 74,016 51.0
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 75 100 2,800 2,700 96.4
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,392 22,135 51,750 29,615 57.2
55 UTILITIES 149 931 930 -1 -0.1
57 COF~4ODITIES & SUPPLIES 30,827 153,255 357,400 204,145 57.1
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 2,000 2,000 100.0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 778 24,620 23,842 96.8
Totals 83,129 489,337 1,103,331 618,994 55.6
SOURCE OF FUNDS
660 VBBICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 83,129 489,837 1,103,331 613,994 55.6
Totals 83,129 489,337 1,103,331 618,994 55.6
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~s:51:~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ Months ( 50.0% ) Re~ainin~
FRRDBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Suaunary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COb~gJNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~:s~:~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 VILLAGE IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIP 59,396 198,094 629,533 431,439 68.5
02 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 13,076 52,887 1,065,000 1,012,113 95.0
03 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 60~507 943,420 2,115,000 1,171,580 55.4
04 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 28,163 75,942 8,301,t17 3,225,175 97.7
06 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 349,438 983,630 4,144,237 3,160,607 76.3
07 POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONST 0 0 0 0
09 MOTOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 42,549 286,532 838,800 552,268 65.8
10 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 0 34,112 36,250 2,138 5.9
11 CAPITAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 553,129 2,574,617 12,129,937 9,555,320 78.8
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,620 97,621 217,778 120,157 55.2
59 OTRER EXPENDIT~/RES 49,459 823,976 1,478,742 654,766 44.3
62 LAND IMPROVEMENTS 0 27,673 190,000 162,327 85.4
63 BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 2,919 23,924 93,000 69,076 74.3
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 43,799 267,750 223,951 83.6
66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 42,549 286,532 838,800 552,268 65.8
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 56,477 164,483 305,033 140,550 46.1
69 INFPJ%STRUCTURE 388,105 1,106,609 8,738,834 7,632,225 87.3
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 553,129 2,574,617 12,129,937 9,555,320 78.8
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FU~D 0 0 0 0
050 MOTOR FUEL TA~ FUND 137,179 727,304 1,071,520 344,216 32.1
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GPJLNT 0 0 0 0
070 COMMUNITY DEVELPWNT'BLOCK GP~NT ' 0 0 0 0
080 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 0 0
500 STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FL~ 72,472 249,333 1,771,653 1,522,320 85.9
520 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 52,030 52,030 100.0
530 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 1,648 13,850 12,202 88.1
540 DOWNTOWN REDEVLP~5~T CONST 1998 0 0 0 0
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 60,507 943,420 2,115,000 1,171,580 55.4
550 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FI/ND 212,259 256,326 2,929,717 2,673,391 91.3
570 FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
580 SSA #7 WHITE O~K/NEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FDI~D 28.163 75,942 3,301~117 3,225,175 97.7
630 pA/{KING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 0 0 0 0
670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 42.849 286,532 838.800 552,268 65.8
680 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT' FUND 0 34 112 36.250 2,138 5.9
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 0 0 0 0
Totals 553,129 2,574,617 12,129,937 9,555,320 78.8
07/12/2000 8 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~5:s~:3o VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
su~03i Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
DEBT SERVICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRA~ TOTALE
02 DEBT SERVICE - PROPERTY TAXES 350 197,192 703,785 508,593 72.0
03 DEBT SERVICE - TAX INCREMENT 1,500 233,850 1,674,001 1,440,151 86.0
04 DEBT SERVICE - B/R SALES TAX 1 16,677 412,237 1,788,085 1,375,848 76.9
05 DEBT SERVICE - B/R SALES T~-X 2 525 116,617 878,788 762,171 86.7
06 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA B & I 0 7,078 39,155 32,077 81.9
Totals 19,052 966,974 5,083,814 4,116,840 81.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
71 BOND PRINCIPAL 12,528 249,074 3,730,086 3,480,992 93.3
72 INTEREST EXPENSE 3,399 714,475 1,342,268 627,793 46.8
73 BANK A~D FISCAL FEES 3,125 3,425 11,480 8,055 70.2
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 19,052 966,974 5,083,814 4,116,840 81.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
140 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY E&I 1987A 0 125,000 47,000 -78,000 -168.0
150 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B 0 0 0 0
160 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
170 REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B 380 72,192 656,785 584,593 89.0
240 DOWNTOW~ REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
250 DOWNTOW~ REDBVLOPM~T B&I 1993A 450 30,034 410,167 380,133 92.7
260 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOP~T B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
270 DOWNTO~ RBDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 450 9,256 143,514 134,258 93.6
280 DOWNTOWiq REDEVL B & I 1998B 300 2,344 4,588 2,244 48.9
290 DOWNTO~ REDEVL B & I 1999 0 165,744 962,388 796,644 82.8
300 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
310 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 150 8,925 343,200 334,275 97.4
320 REFU~ING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993E 75 33,961 307,502 273,541 89.0
330 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 150 17,980 186,160 168,180 90.3
340 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 225 26,848 213,748 186,900 87.4
350 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 150 9,204 63,710 54,508 85.6
360 DOW~TO%~N REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 300 26,472 153,344 126,872 82.7
380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 19,644 319,036 613,227 294,191 48.0
390 FLOOD CONTROL 2000 E & I -3,717 -3,717 60,538 64,255 106.1
410 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 150 59,026 618,254 559,228 90.5
420 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS E&I 1996A 225 6,291 157,634 151,343 96.0
430 STREET IMPROVB & I 1998A 150 51,300 102,900 51,600 80.1
810 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS E&I 0 0 0 0
830 SSA ~6 GEORGE/ALBERT E&I 0 7.078 39,155 32,077 81.9
840 SSA #7 W~ITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Totals 19,052 966,974 5,088,814 4,116,840 81.0
20
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~5:s~30 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FR~DBR01
SUM021 Department BudgetEXPenditure Summary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
RETIREE PENSIONS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 MISCELLANEOUS PENSIONS 4,535 27,212 55,300 28,088 50.8
02 POLICE PENSIONS 132,431 779,115 1,699,730 920,615 54.2
03 FIRE PENSIONS 132,817 821,722 1,513,035 691,313 45.7
Totals 269,783 1,628,049 3,268,065 1,640,016 50.2
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
53 PENSION BENEFITS 269,737 1,627,115 3,261,465 1,634,350 50.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46 934 6,600 5,666 85.8
Totals 269,783 1,628,049 3,268,065 1,640,016 50.2
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 1,642 9,852 20,500 10,648 51.9
710 POLICE PENSION FUND 132,431 779,115 1,699,730 920,615 54.2
720 FIRS PENSION FUND 1~2,817 821,722 1,513,035 691,313 45.7
730 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 2,893 17,360 34,800 17,440 50.1
Totals 269,783 1,628,049 3,268,065 1,640,016 50.2
07/12/2000 6 Months { 50.0% ) Completed
~S:Sl:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ Months { 50.0% } Bemalning
FRRDBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure S%hL~Lary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
RISK MANAGEMENT Exp~nded Expended Budget Balance Percent
07/12/2000 6 Months ( 50.0% ) Completed
~s,5~:~1 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 50.0% ) Remaining
FR~DBR01
SUMos1 Department Budget ExPenditure Sm'araary
01/01/00 - 06/30/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
NON-DEPARTMENTAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PRO,RAM TOTALS
01 CONTINGENCIES 15,702 559,276 1,024,000 464,724 45.4
Totals 15,702 559,276 1,024,000 464,724 45.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 15,531 47,105 0 -47,105
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
53 PENSION BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 171 171 0 -171
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
80 INTERFI/~D T~tANSFERS 0 512,000 1,024,000 512,000 50.0
Totals 15,702 559,276 1,024,000 464,724 45.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 15,702 S59,276 1,024,000 464,724 45.4
Totals 15,702 559,276 1,024,000 464,724 45.4
23
07/12/2000 6 Months ( S0.0% ) Completed
~s:s~:~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6 Mo~ths I so.o% I Eem~inin~
FRRDBR01 -
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Su/~mary
01/01/00 06/30/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PRO~RAMTOTALS
02 LIBRARY SERVICES 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
90 COMPONENT UNIT EXPENDITURES 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
950 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
Totals 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
24
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JULY 12, 2000
SUBJECT: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SCHOLARSHIP AWARD
This scholarship award marks the seventh year the Village has provided $1000 to a
deserving student who is a resident of Mount Prospect, Generous funding from ARC
Disposal & Recycling, Mid-City National Bank and AT&T allowed the Village to extend two
scholarship awards to these deserving students.
The students who will be awarded the scholarship are:
· Christen Stoltman
· Neel Patel
Mayor Farley, Assistant Village Manager Dave Strahl and Human Services Director Nancy
Morgan interviewed applicants who met the income and residency criteria and found these
individuals would be excellent representatives for the community. At the Village Board
meeting on July 18, 2000, Christen and Neel will be present to receive recognition from the
Village Board and the Workforce Development Council.
DAVID STRAHL
ROM : [~ARR[~I JOHNSON ARCHITECTS~ iNC RHONE NO. : B47 ~ .......
Village of MI. Pms~ Community ~velopment
Mt. Pros~ck Illinois 6005~2229
~e: 2 E ~d & Kensington
Mt. Prosper, Illinois
Dear Mr. Cooney,
Shell Oil has requested an exception to the Development Code in the matter of'
storm water detention. Our case will be before the Village Board on $uly ] 8, 2000 for the
first reading of'the approved ordinance. W~ren Johnson Architects acting as agent on
behalf of Shell Off Company respectfully requests a waiver from the second reading with
the Village Board. We appreciate your consideration to this request
Ronald J. Ambrose
Warren Johnson Archkeets
~7-11-~ 09:89 RECEIVED FROH:847 ~S9 9641 P.02
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION FROM CHAPTER 16
OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE (DEVELOPMENT)
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
2 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, Shell Oil Company (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner) is the owner
of the property located at 2 East Rand Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property) and legally described as attached and shown as Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested an exception from Section 16.405.F.1 of
Chapter 16 (Development) of the Village Code, providing for exceptions from the
requirement to provide appropriate stormwater detention.
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the
request for an exception from Section 16.405.F.1 of Chapter 16 (Development Code)
for the Subject Property at a special meeting on June 14, 2000, said requests being the
subject of PC 05-2000, and by a vote of 6-0, recommends approval of the exception
from Chapter 16 as requested; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
'SECTION'ONE: The the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as
findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property an exception from Section
16.405.F.1 of Chapter 16 (Developmentl of the Village Code of Mount Prospect
requiring stormwater detention.
~: Except for the modification granted herein, all other requirements
of Said Development Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
Page 2/2
2 E. Rand Road
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Fadey
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. L0we
Village Clerk
EXHIBIT A
~ L AT OF 5 U t:~'t~ 'Y
O~
ORE)ERE:E) BY : SHtrLL OIL CO.
vw[
6/6/00
6/12/00
6/13/00
7/6/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE
CORPORATE AUTHORITIES WITH REGARDS TO CONSIDERATION
OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLAN COMMISSION
AND THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Section 2.201 of Article II of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be
further amended by adding a new Section 2.201.1 entitled "Consent Agenda" to be and
read as follows:
"2,20t,1: CONSENT AGENDA:
A. The Village Manager may submit to the President and Board of Trustees, not
less than three (3) days prior to the date of the meeting, a separate Consent
Agenda to be considered by the President and Board of Trustees immediately
after "Old Business"and before "New Business."
B. The Consent Agenda shall contain all matters deemed by the Village Manager to
be non-controversial in nature. The Village Manager, in his or her discretion,
may include on the Consent Agenda all matters on which a preliminary vote or
recommendation has been taken by the Village Board, subject to the drafting of
an ordinance or resolution. The Manager may also include on the Consent
Agenda resolutions, ordinances or motions, accepting plats of subdivision and
appointments and reappointments for boards or commissions, together with all
other matters that the Manager deems appropriate for a Consent' Agenda.
C. The Consent Agenda may be adopted by a roll call vote'and the roll call shall be
recorded in the minutes of the Village board as approving each item contained on
the Consent Agenda. The motion to 'adopt f~e..Consent Agenda shall .be non~
debatable. Any item may be' removed from .the 'Consent Agenda at the Village
Board meeting at the request 'of any one .Trustee or Village President, in which
case the .item shall be considered separately.
Page 2/3
Consent Agenda
D. The taking of a single vote on the Consent Agenda shall be deemed sufficient
compliance with all requirements of law, as if the vote had been taken separately
by nays and ayes on the question of each ordinance, resolution and motion
included on the Consent Agenda. In the event one or more Trustees wishes to
be recorded as passing or voting against any item included in the Consent
Agenda, that Trustee shall so notify the Village Clerk who will make an
appropriate reference in the minutes to record such negative votes."
SECTION TWO: Paragraph C of Section 2.202 entitled "Order of Business; Regular
Meetings Only" of Chapter 2 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further
amended by deleting Section 2.202.C in its entirety, and replacing Section 2.202.C with
the following item, so that hereinafter said section shall be and read as follows:
"C. The written agenda shall set forth the order of business substantially as follows:
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4, Pledge of Allegiance
5. Approval of minutes of previous regular meetings and special meetings,
if any.
6. Approval of Bills and Monthly Financial Report
7. Mayor's Report
8. Communications and Petitions - Citizens to be Heard
9. Old Business
~
11.
12., New Business
Page 3/3
Ch. 2, Consent Agenda
13. Village Manager's Report
14. Any Other Business (including items for information only)
15. Adjournment."
SECTION THREE: The aforesaid modifications to the Village Code shall be reviewed
not eadier than February, 2001 nor later than April 1, 2001 to determine the
effectiveness and value as regards the deliberative and legislative processes in the
Village.
SECTION FOUR: As of the effective date of this Ordinance, the Corporate Authorities
shall take up recommendations of the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan
Commission by direct consideration of an ordinance or other legislative device without
the necessity of an interim motion to concur or not concur with the recommendation of
such body. This procedure requiring such direct consideration shall prevail irrespective
of any past practice, executive statement, or other regulation to the contrary.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT!
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Fadey
Village President
ATTES'F:,
Velma W. Lowe
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER '~t° ~[t'1'~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '~ ~l~
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18,2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-20-2000 - 802 S. WILLIAM STREET
VARIATION TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE IN A REQUIRED SIDE YARD
SETBACK
STEVE AND MARLO SIAVELIS - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Variation to allow construction of a detached
garage in a required side yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their June 22, 2000 meeting.
The proposal is a request for Variation to permit a detached garage to encroach approximately 2 feet imo the required
five-foot side interior setback. The proposed garage would be located in the same location as the existing garage and
the petitioner would use the existing concrete pad. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staffmemo.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed Variation in terms of Zoning Code Variation Standards. Some ZBA
members noted that constructing the new garage per code would increase the amount of lot coverage and could exceed the
amount of lot coverage permitted. There was discussion about having to reconstruct the deck and fence if the garage was
located five feet off the property line, and how the approach into the garage could be difficult to maneuver. The ZBA
members found that these conditions censtituted a hardship. Based on that finding, the ZBA voted 4-0 to recommend
approval of the proposed Variation to permit a detached garage to encroach two feet into the required five foot setback at 802
S. William Street, Case No. ZBA-20-2000.
I Wiliiam J. ~ooney Jr., AICP
/JC
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-20-2000 Hearing Date: June 22, 2000
PETITIONER: Steve Ziavelis
802 S. William St.
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7, 2000 D. dILYHEP~dLD
REQUEST: Variation_to permit a detached garage to encroach into a required sideyard
setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Keith Youngquist
Arlene sUrace~, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Connolly, SeniOr Planner
H~TERESTED PARTW..S: Steve & Marlo Siavelis
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the rneeting~to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. At 7:45, Ms. Juracek announced Chse ZBA-20~2000, a request for a Variation to permit the construction of
a detached garage to encroach into a required sideyard sethack.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stating that notice had been p~ovided in the form of a newspaper ad, mailed notices,
and a sign on the subject pro~. iShe described the'petitioner's reasons for the proposed Variation tO permit a
detached garage to encroach into a required sideyard setback.~ She said the petitioner WiShed to demolish his existing
garage and construct a new garage On the'existing slab, which is 2.97' off the lot line. Current code requires a setback
$'. In order to construct the new garage, petitioner would need a Variation. She stated that the petitioner's motivation
for the request is to retain a brick wall and deck that connects the garage to the house. This property is in flood plain;
however, the petitioner will not be changing the size or location of the garage so flood plain regulations do not apply.
Although the proposed Variation may not have a negative effect on neighborhood character, the submittal does not
suppo~ a finding of hardship~ as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C,9 of the. Zoning Ordinance,
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board denial df'the proposed
Variations to .permit a detached garage to encroach approximately 2' into a required sideyard setback. The Village
Board's decision is final for this case.
.Steve Siave!is was swora inand testified his garage was badly deteriorated and needed to be replaced, lie.also .stated
that the.slab is in good con. dition and he Planned to build'the new garage on (he old Slab. He reiterated his. desire to
keep the wood deck and brick fence connecting.the g~age to'the house. He dso stated that moving.the:location of the
garage'would make. it impossible.to, back;out without hitting the house. -
Mr. Floros asked ifhe had built the originv~ garage and Mr..Slavic!is .s~i~'d that the garage was there when ho had bought
the ho.u?.' ~'.F. loros ~ked'how Old ~he,. g~rag~.was and Mr.' Siavelis res'ponde~l that it was 25 -30 years old: l~ir.
. ~loros inquired kf the nei.gl~.~, r, ..who is building a two-ca~ garage; had.any objections to. his plans to replgoe tho garage.
· in'th6 ~ame lOCation. Mr: Smvelis ~aid he did not:' - . ..
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-20-2000
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson Page 2
Arlene Juraeek explained that when staff makes their evaluation of petitioners' requests they must be careful that the
criteria presents a Ixue hardship as defined by code. She said she realized it would be an actual hardship for the
petitioner to relocate the garage. Ms. Juraeek pointed out the petitioner's plan would be a straightforWard one to one
replacement.
Mr. Flores said he agreed, that this case met the layman's definition of hardship and he saw no problem with replacing
the garage.
Keith Yo~ngquist said the property was very close tO 10t egverage and to move the garage back would increase the
amount 0flor COverage. He said he concurred with otlier board member's comments.
Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to recommend approval 0fthe request to permit a detached garage to~ encroach into a
required sideyard setback. Leo Flores seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Flores, Luxem~ Youngqmst, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4-0. The Village Board's decision is final for Case ZBA-20-2000.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Flores made motion to adjourn, seconded by Kei~' Youngquist. The tuotion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned~
Barbara Swiatek, planning SecretaD'
'~futd~' Core(o Iy; enior Panner ,~
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER~//
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-20-2000 - VARIATION TO PERMIT A DETACHED GARAGE TO ENCROACH
INTO A REQUIRED S]X)E SETBACK
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Steve and Marlo Siavelis
802 S. William
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owners of the Property
Lot Size: 8,705 square feet (approximately)
Existing Zoning: RI Single Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
'Lot Co'~erage: 44% existing "
44% proposed
45% maximum per R1 district
Requested Action: Proposal for a Variation to allow the reconstruction of a detached garage to
encroach into the required five foot side setback.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property is an existing single-story home located on a 66' X 131.9' (8,705 square feet) single-family
lot on a residential sweet. The existing house has a front setback of 32' from William Street. The existing
detached garage has a side setback ranging, from 2.97 to 3.33 feet. The property north of the subject pr0pen'y (800
S. William) has an attached, front-loading garage and the house is located more than 30 feet from the side l~t'line.
The petitioner is seeking to demolish the existing garage and Construct a new 20' X 22' garage. The size of the
proposed new garage would not be increased and the petitioner proposes to t;se the existing concrete garage'slab
on grade (pad). As the existing side setback is 2.97', the p~op0sed gax;age would be the. same distance from the
prOperty line. The side setback requirement for a detached accessory structure is five feet.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat-of surve~ and site plan and
visited the Site.
ZBA-20-2000 - Side Setback Variation
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards
Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of' the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These
standards relate to:
A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently
having an interest in the property;
ca lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
ca protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The parcel is developed with a single family home with a detached garage. The subject parcel is an 8,705 square
foot lot that is located extremely close to the floodplain. Floodplain and floodway regulations could be applicable
if the petitioner proposed to enlarge the garage. Since the applicant proposes to construct a new garage on the
existing cement slab on grade (pad), floodplain and floodway regulations do not apply.
The applicant's stated reasons for the proposed variation are based on a desire to maintain the existing brick,
fence:like su'ucmre that encloses the yard and links the wooden deck to the garage. Furthermore, the petitioner
would like to maintain the existing approach and entrance to the garage. If the new garage was constructed per
the required setback, the driveway, wood deck, and brick fence-like structure would have to be reconfigured.
The condition of the lot (size, width or shape) does not make the proposed encroachment necessary. The
petitioner is able to meet the five-foot setback requirement if the deck and brick fence-like structure are relocated
and or modified. There is not sufficient justification for a Variation by the above hardship standards.
The proposed garage would not likely have a negative or positive effect on the character of the existing single-
family residential area or on the public welfare.
RECOMMENDATION
Although the proposed variation would not have a significant effect on neighborhood character, the submittal
does not support a fmding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA deny the proposed Variation to permit a
garage to encroach approximately two feet (2') into the required 5-foot side interior yard setback for the residence
at 802 S. William Street, Case No. ZBA-20-2000. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
' ~ (nev~. ~C~,DirectorofCommunityDevelopmentWiiliam~.~-Cooney,..
H :~G EN~ LN G~.I3 A'~. B A 2000~taff Meraos~l~A-20=2000 {Siavelis. 802 S. Cseorge).doc
LAGE OF MOUNT PRQSPECT
.,NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - i}i~i~g Division
..~,.,q~me~on Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 847.818.5328
FAX 847.818.5329
Variation Request
The Zoning Board of Appeals has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and
those variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's
Zoning Or~flinance.
PETITION FOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REVIEW Cl Village Board Final ~1 ZBA Final
i DevclopmcntNametAddress i. . i-<..' ...... - "~
t~ Hearing Date ·
Common Address(es) (Street Number, Street)
)02_ .X. wZccz,4 -qr.
Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s)
z OR-lB- >..oW -'01o
~ Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
LOT 75 IN CLEARI~P~OOK EsTATEs. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2
~: OF TIlE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 41 'NOR:TH, RANGE 11,
'~ -- EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL IViERIDIAN LYING NORTH OF THE CENTER. LINE OF C.,OLF .
~ ROAD AS PER PLAT OF DEDICATION,, RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 1929 AS DOCUMENT
--NUMBER 10494973, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SAID CLEARBROOK ESTATES,
REGISII;RED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF i'IILES OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
-- ON AUGUST 21,1956 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1690611. -
qame Telephone (day)
Co~oration Telephone (evening)
S~eet Address F~:
Ci~ State Zip Code Pager
Developer
OA~ LAv~ $~. ~ o
A~o~ey
~e Telephone (day)
Ad.ess F~
Su~eyor
~e ~O g~ ~. ~E~KgO~ Telephone(~y) ~- ~-0~90
Ad~e~a
F~
C.ZCA ao ,zc. ~o ~31
Engineer
N~e Telephone (day)
Architect
N~e Telephone (day):
Ad.ess F~ -
~nds~pe Architect ' '
Ad.ess '
M~t~s~ ~p~ of ~i~ ~vel~Pm~t 'Phone ~7.818.5328
I~ ~U~ ~emon S~e~ Mo~t ~sp~ lllin0is, 60056 F~ M7.818~5329
2 ~D 847.392.60~
Code Section(s) for which Variat on(s) is (are) Requested ~
Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justification to the Attached Standards for Variations
AIY XJ CU,r, r6cr£ 7u pzct e4 R z.c/
pl~ n~ ~m ~e ~ppli~fion ~ not ~ accepted ~ ~ petition h~ ~en ~lly completed ~d fll mqu~ p~ ~ o~ ma~
~w ~n ~3fg~y anbmi~ed to ~e p~g Di~iom It ~ ~ongly ~u~d ~at ~e pe~fioner
~p~fi~t~ Vill~ge ~ an ~t m~t~ e~ ~ ~viewed for ae~ey ~d eompletane~ prior to ~ubmi~l.
In c~ide~on ~f ~e ~fo~ation con. ed ~ ~h ~on ~ well ~ ~II ~p~g d~o~ it ~ mqu~ed ~at ~p~vfl ~ ~ven
to ~h r~ ~e ~pH~t h ~e o~er or a~o~ r~r~enmfive of ~e o~er of ~e pro~.
pro~ ~t employ~ of~o Village of Mo~t ~s~ ~d ~e~ agan~ pe~ion to enter on
for v~l ~p~on of~e subj~t p~.
I he.by ~ ~ ~1 ~fo~a6on provided he~ ~d ~ ~1 matefia~ submi~ ~ ~s~iation wi~
ac~ to ~e ~ of my ~owledge.~
Appli~t ~ 2~ Date ~- ~' O0
If applicant is not property owner:.
I hereby.designate the applicant to act as my. agent for the purpose of seeking Ihe Variation(s) described hi this application and the
associated supporting material.
Property Owner 'Date
· l~oun~'prosp~t De~mant 0fC°mmUnit~ De~d0pment. '- ' Phone 847.818.$328
100 South Emerson Slree/., Mount l~ospect Illinois, 60056' Fax 847 8i8.:5329
· . 3 TDD 847.392.6064
Lonnquist Blvd. ~
~ Sunrise Park
~ ~ Mount Prospect
807 ~ Park D~ct
811 810 811 810
813 ~ 81~ 813 ' 812
sis ] 814 815 814 Sunset Road
Sunset Road
903 902
905
907 ~6
909 908
911 910
913 912
915 914
919 918
Zoning District Boundary,
~m~m-,~-,,, Village Boundary
Out of V~llage
$~1~ = 1' to 300'
Location map for Case No.,ZBA-20.-2000
Siavelis Residence Variation
VILLAGE OF MO PECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER B~.
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: RYLY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-21-2000 - CONDITIONAL USE PERIVIIT - 2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
AMEND ORD. # 5039 TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,800 SQUARE FOOT
MAINTENANCE GARAGE AT A CARTAGE FACILITY
MAGGIE FILLI~N - APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits theh' recommendation to approve an amendment to a Conditional Use permit to allow
them construction of a maintenance garage at a cartage facility. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their June
22, 2000 meeting.
The Village approved the petitioner's request to operate a cartage facility at 2400 Terminal Drive last August. The
maintenance garage was not part of the original proposal and increases the intensity of the Conditional Use as
previously approved. Per See. 14.203.F.13 of the Zoning Ordinance, the modification requires the approval ora new
Conditional Use permit. The proposed garage will be constructed according to Village Code requirements and meet
the required setbacks. The garage will be used to conduct pre-trip inspections and used to service only those trucks
scheduled to depart from the Road Runner site. The garage hours will be 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.
The applicant has agreed to pay their fair share of the cost for a traffic study and the installation of a traffic signal if it
is deemed necessary. The Zoning Board voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Conditional Use with the
following conditions:
1. Meet all Development and Fire Code requirements for the entire site;
2. The petitioner shall enter in~o a covenant agreeing to pay their fair share of the cost of a traffic study and
installation ora traffic signal at the intersection of Badger Road and Oakton Street if it is determined necessary;
3. Complete all landscaping improvements prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy for the proposed garage.
William J. Cooney Jr., AICP
MINUTES OF TIiE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASENO. ZBA-21-2000 Hearing Da~e: June 22, 2000
PETITIONER: Maggie Fillman
Roadrunner Express, Inc.
POB 7295
Rosemont, IL 60018
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7, 2000 DAI£YHERA£D
REQUEST: Amend Conditional Use Approval for a cartage facility to allow construction
of additional buildings
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Flores
Elizabeth Luxem
Keith Y0ungquist
Arlene Sura~ek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Patrick Brankin
John & Maggie Filhnan
JoeDelay, 2416 Terminal Drive
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. At 7:50, after hea~ingtwo other cases~ Ms. juraeek announced Case ZBA-21-2000, a requestto amend a
Conditional Use for a cartage facility to allow construction 6f additional buildings.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the case and explained the Conditional Use permit was originally approved
in August of 1999. She said at this time, the petitioner plans to construct a 4,800 sq.ft, garage to perform safety checks
and regular maintenance for the trucks seheduledto go in and out of the Road Runner facility. Ms. Connolly explained
that, since these plans were not included in the original Conditional Use, the petitioner must apply for a new one. She
said that the pr0p~.sed garage would meet the Zoning Code setback requirements and would be located further away
from the frontag~ than the ~xis~ing building. Hours Of oPeration Would remain the same. The number of trucks will
not be increased. Aider the garage and parking lot are constructed, the petitioner will complete all landscape
requirements of the original Conditional Use. Upon revie.w of this case, the Village staff had concerns about possible
~ccidents at Oakton & Badge~ Dr. Much of the area is monitored by Des Plaines police 'however, in the area
monitored .by Mount Prospect, approximately 20 accidents have been reported in the last 5 years. Increased activity
may impact ~c floxv and may.require additional safety measures to minimize.the risk of accidents. Ms: Connolly
~oncluded that/the,~p~titioner~s ~e~uest is in ~c~..m. pliance wi~ Conditi6nai Uso requirements, .therefore, staff
recommends appr°v:~l 'of the pctiti~er'S request wig the 3 c~nditio~ listed in staffs ~e~0rt,-inclU~ing ~ they pay
their portion of any traffic'impact analysis o~: improvements.
'Arlene Juracek asked for clarification regarding accidents, She noted staffs report indicated only two accidents inthe
intron of Badger Rd. and Oakton, but 20 in the larger radius of Terminai Drive, Busse and Oakton. Ms. Juracek
said, based on that, we Cannot attribute the larg~ amount 0faccidents to Road Runner's trucks.'
Zoning Board of Appeals , ZBA-21-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Patrick Brankin, attorney with the law firm of Sehaln, Burney, Ross and Citron in Chicago, was sworn in and testified
that, at the original case to request a Conditional Use, discussion arose regarding a future structure to conduct pre and
post road checks, safety tests and truck maintenance. He said tonight's request is for a Conditional Use to erect that
strueture. Mr. Brankin said the proposed garage is a shed type design of steel construction and will be used solely for
road safety checks, which are very important. He said he wanted to state for the record that since the facility opened in
January, 2000, there have been no accidents with Road Runner trucks. He said the petitioners had reviewed staffs
report and agreed to the conditions related to the Development and Fire Codes and landscaping. They do have
concerns regarding the covenantrequiring Road Runner to pay their fair share of a traffic study plus traffic signals.
Road Runner proposes a cap on the amount. The petitioner proposes a cap of $2,500 or some amount the Board deems
reasonable.
Arlene Juracek said the Board would take that under advisement and ask staff to explain the fair share concept. She
said we were happy to see the business up and running and viable and can understand the need to establish this
building.
Ms. Connolly said when staff originally proposed the fair share it was divided equally between the number of propewy
owners in that area. Upon further consideration, it was thought that the share should be proportional to the amount of
traffic each property generates. A fair share could be based on the number of trucks using the road on a daily basis. If
a traffic study is conducted, the consultant could be advised to look at who is generating the traffic to determine the
fair share of each property.
Ms. Juracek asked if the state or county would be involved in the traffic study.
Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development, said it is necessary to meet IDOT warrants in order to get
a traffic light. He said the traffic study would determine if the situation meets those warrants. He also said the study
would identify the volume of traffic and the potential impact of the Road Runner trucks on the severity of accidents.
Mr. Blue said it was staffs opinion that those who benefit from the study and signals would need to support the
endeavor.
Elizabeth Luxem asked how soon the study would be done, since the cost of one would be continually rising. Michael
Blue said it could be done this year or next but that no steps had been taken to start the process.
Ms. Luxem asked if it would feasible to set a cap of $2,500 without knowing the expense involved.
Mr. Blue said that, in discussions among staff, it was thought that $5,000 would be a reasonable cap for Road Runner.
Ms Juracek said the public hearing was not the place to negotiate the amount of the cap and asked if the Board would
agree, as a condition of approval of recommendation tn the Village Board; that the petitioner and staff come to an
agreement about the amount of the cap before the case goes to the Village Board. Board members agreed.
Pat Brankin said the petitionem agreed that they would continue to work with Village staff to arrive at an agreeable
alnonnt.
Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to recommend approval of Case ZBA-21-2000, to amend a Conditional Use approval
for a cartage facility, with the condition that petitioner come to agreement with staff on a dollar amount for the
proposed covenant. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Flores, Luxem, Youagquist, and Jurucek
NAYS: None
Motion'was.approVed 4-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-21-2000
~"~' ~" ~ Page 3
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson : ~?: ~ ~' ............
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist, The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
~ly Con~z(ll.~. Senior ~'lanner ' ~
Village. of Mount Prospect
Commumty Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIKPERSON
FI{OM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOK PLANNEP~
DATE: JLrNE 15, 2000
HEAKING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-21-2000 - AMEND CONDITIONAL USE APPI{OVAL (CARTAGE FACILITY) -
2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Maggie Fillman
Roadrunner Express, Inc.
P.O. Box 7295
Rosemont, IL 60018
Status of Petitioner: Property Owner
Lot Size: 2.3 acres
Existing Zoning: I1 Limited Industrial
Existing Land Use: Cartage Facility
Lot Coverage, Existing: Approximately 54,570 square feet (53.7%)
Lot Coverage, Proposed: Approximately 59,405 square feet (59.3%)
Requested Action: Petitioner is seeking to amend a previously approved Conditional Use (Ord. # 5039) to
permit conslruction of a 4,835 square foot garage at a cartage facility.
BACKGROUND
'Proposal
Tile Village approved the petitioner's request 2o operate a cartage facility at 2400 Terminal Drive last August.
The applicant proposes to construct'a new 4,835 square foot garage.to perform safety Checks and routine
maintenance InspectionS on the vehicles. The structure will meet the required setbacks.
Review and Approval P£ocess
The property's current zoning is I1 Limited Industrial. The proposed cartage'facility is listed as a Conditional Uae
in the I1 district. The proposed garage Increases the Intensity of the Conditional. Use as previously approved. Per
Sec. 14.203[F. 13 ef the Zoning OrdInance, the modification requires the approval of a new Conditional Use
permit.
ZBA-21-2000 Roadrunner Express, Inc. - Amend Conditional Use
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning
The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for general industrial uses and the property's
zoning is I1 Limited Industrial. The proposed modification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designation, and the use is listed as a Conditional Use in the I1 district.
Site Plan
The proposed site plan consists of the proposed garage and the existing facilities. The existing structures on the
site would remain with no changes. The site has been improved in keeping with the conditions of Zoning
approval: new landscaping has been installed along a portion of the property, the existing fence has been
relocated, and a dumpster enclosure was installed. The petitioner proposes to improve the parking lot and install
the remaining landscaping after the proposed garage is completed.
As noted in the original Conditional Use application, the existing office structure is setback 10 feet from the side
property line, where 15' is required. The existing parking lot encroaches into the same side setback and also into
the required 30' front setback. The non-conformities to the side setback requirements would remain, but are
adjacent to another industrial property. Per Zoning Code Section 14.402, non-conforming build'rags and
structures may be continued and expanded, so long as the non-conformities are not expanded and no non-
conformities are created.
The proposed garage will be constructed according to Village code requirements and meet the required setbacks.
The garage will be used to conduct pre-trip inspections to ensure that the brakes, tires, and engine are in working
order. The garage will be used to service only those trucks scheduled to depart from the Road Runner site. The
petitioner estimates that a total of 7 to 15 trucks will leave the facility on a daily basis. The garage hours will be 7
a.m. to 10 p.m.
Parking:
The 1,826 square foot office building and 1,826 square foot warehouse required a total of 9 parking spaces, one of
which is handicap accessible. The petitioner has provided the required parking spaces and does not propose to
add parking. The garage will only service vehicles scheduled to arrive/depart from the facility and there is
sufficient parking for the trucks.
Open 8pace:
Additional screening around the proposed garage is not required because the structure will be located in the rear
portion of the property, setback approximately 195 feet from the Tem~inal Drive entrance. As you recall, in the
original Conditional Use application, the petitioner agreed to install landscaping along Term/mi Drive to buffer
the site from the adjacent residential use. The petitioner has installed portions of the required landscaping and
will complete the installation when the proposed garage is complete.
Other Issues
The subject property is located adjacent to a residantial area to the south. Therefore, the hours of operation Will
continue to be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10~.00 p.m. to help mimmize noise impacts on the adjacent residential area.
Review by Other Village Departments
The. Engineering Division and Fire'Department have completed preliminary reviews of this proposal and had no
comments at this ~ime. However, submission of final plans meeting all applicable Development Code and Fire
Code requirements is required with the building permit application.
BA-21-2000 Roadrunner Express, Inc. - Amend Conditional Use
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 3
In addition, the Police Department reviewed the petitioner's request and researched accident data for the area. In
the past 5 years, Mount Prospect handled two accidents (non-injury) at the intersection, of Badger Road and
Oakton Street. (Most accidents at this intersection were handled by Des Plaines and the accident data was not
available.) Expanding the scope of the analysis to the Terminal Drive/Busse Road/Oakton Street area, there were
20 accidents in the past five years, three involving injuries. Increased mack activity in the Terminal DrivefBusse
Road/Oakton Street area has the potential to impact traffic flow and may require additional safety measures to
minimize traffic accidents.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate
to:
n The Conditional Use will not have a de,mental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfor~ or
general welfare;
The Conditional Usc will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or thc value of other proper~es in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
Q Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on
Village streets; and
n Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
The site is located in a predominantly industrial area. The proposed amended Conditional Use would have
limited negative impacts on the adjacent area. The proposed cartage facility and new garage will continue to be In
compliance will the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements, except where existing non-
conformities will be maintained or reduced.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the Z~A can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Conditional
Uses in Section 14.203. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed Conditional Use with the
following conditions:
1. Meet all Development and Fire Code requirements for the entire site;
2. The petitioner shall enter into a covenant agreeing to pay their fair share of the cost to Install a traffic signal
at the intersection of Badger Road and Oakton Street if it is determined necessary in the future.
3. Complete all landscaping improvements prior to obtaining a certificate of occupancy for the proposed
garage.
William J[. Co0ney, Jr., AIcp
Director of Community Development
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division
I00 S. F.,merso~ S~:eet '
Mount Proslm~, ll}inols 60056
Phone 847.818.$328
FAX 847.818.5329
Application for Conditional Use Approval
· . . . "..: ,:'. . !.. .' : .... ..
Addre$~(~) (Street Number, StreW)
2400 T.~n~I Drive
Site A~a (Acres) P~operty Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Sit,)
2.3 I-i 2 - 1~825.57 s.f.] ol~e--stor~
Setbacks:
Front Rear Side Side
min. 60 ft. min. 120 ft.'{(east) 9.96 ft.tX~west~m~n. 180 ft.
Building Height Lot Coverag~ (M) [ Number of Parking Spaces
Adjacent Land U~:
North South ~ East West
tankq tollva~rI petroleum tanks tollway
or Couniy A~igned pi. Number(s)
08-23-300-053-0000
Legal l~iption (atta~a additional ~
Please see attached.
Nme: ' I Telephone (day)
'Maggie Fil~"-- . (847) 910-8511
corporation , Il. TetephoPe (evening)
Roadrunner Express, Inc. {
StreetAddre~ , (847) 91-8511
~'* - 1TM '1 z,~¢~, ~,
Name ' Tckphon¢ <daT)
SAHE AS APPLICAltT
Corporation
TolcOn. (cv.ning)
Fag:
......
Ci~ Smt~ Zip C~e P~er
~eloper ..... ...
Nme ,. N/A Telephone (d~y)
Ad~e~ F~
ARor~ey
N~e ~o~s .R. Bu,.er/Patrick,. Brankln Telcph0ne(~y). (312) 332~20~
Ad~ea .Sc~iu, ~u~ey, Ross & CitroR, Ltd. F~ (3~2) 332~514
_222 ~. LaSalle S~_~ Suite 1910
Chicago ~ lll~ois 60601 ..........
$a~yor
~e Certified Su~ey Co. .. Tclc~on~ (~y) ~773~ 775-7755
A~ ~7~0 .. m~to. A~.. ... ~ ~ (773) 77~-2S~
~icag°, IL 60646 ....
~e N/A ,. Teleph~e (~y)
Amhlte~t
N~c N/A Telephone (day): . .
Ad.ess
Name N/A Tcl~h~e (~y): ..
Ad~ - - ..,
~osp~ ~cnt of~i~ ~elopm~t Ph~c 847.818.5328
~utK Em~on'S~e~. M~t Pro~ Illinois F~x
2 ~D 847.392.~
Proposed Conditional Use (as listed in the zanln$ district)
Garage to.be built on side of exist4n~ cartage facility ..
D~cribe i~ Detail thc Build h§s Md Activities Proposed and How g~ Proposed Usc.Meets the Attached Standards t'or
Conditional Use Approval (attach additional sheets it'necessary)
PLEASE SEE ATTACn~'~
l~Ioa~ of Op, rtt~on
'/:00 aom. - i0:00
Address(es) (S~cet Number,
Same as existing site information - Please see attached
O Site Area (AcreS) I Properly Zoning Total Building Sq. Ft. (Site) Ft. Devoted to Propose.~ Use
i S~thacks: '
Front Rear Side Side
~'" Btffidi~g [-[eiSht Lot Covcr'a~e (%) Number of P~rk~g Spaces
' pl~tsc note tl~tt thc application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed a~d all ~qui~d plans n~d o:bet materiaE
have been satL~'actotily submitted to the Pinnnin§ Division. hteomplcte submL'tals '.viii no~ b~ accepted. It is s~'or~gl)' sugg~-ted that the
petitione~ schedule an akepoirmne~ with thc appropriate ¥iliage staff so that materials ca~ be reviewed for accuracy a~d completeness
at the time of submittal. :
In coe~ider~on of the information contaL-tec[ in t~is pet~t[o~ as well s~ ali supporting docume~ation, it is requested that approval be
to this request. The applicant is tile owner or tuthorized representative of the owner of'the property. The pctiRoner and the owner of
property gta~t employees of the Villa§e of Mou~t Prospect ~d b%Lt age,ts permlssion to enter on the property d~ri~& reasonable hours
for vis,iai insp~"tion of the subject propc~y.
I bereb¥ atTu'm t~t ~l[~vided her~in and in all materials submitted in ~ssociation with this application arc ~'u¢ and
accurate to the'~est/of my ImoT~e-e~e. ~'"-~ i
Atto~'ney fo~ Applicant
If applicant tsnOt property owne~.
I hereby desig~at~ the' applic~n~ to act as my ag;tnt for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this appl!cation and thc
associated supporting material.
Pmpcny Owner Please see attached letter Date .. .....
M0u~t ProsPecl Departra~lt of Community Developmcn~ .P~one $4~ S I.$.$~8
100 S6uu~ Emerson S~ee~. MOunt Prospect Illinois Fax 8~?.815.5329
3 TDD ~4T.392.60~4
Affidavit of Owners
COUNTY OF COOK )
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
the sore )
ancc~-c~ ~ )ownero£the property
an authorized of~ccr of the )
commonly described as '~-'~, ~ ~--~ e~'(
as of tkis d~te.
Signature
·. ' APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAl.
ROADRUNNER EXPRESS, INC.
SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED
The Petitioner is presently operating its business on the site pursuant to the conditional use
approved by the Village Board in case 213A-20-99. Petitioner seeks to expand the conditional use
by the construction of a steel garage on the property to safety check its vehicles.
STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAl.
1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be
detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare.
The conditional use for the operation has already been approved. The
conSh'uction of the garage and will not alter the use but will rather allow
for necessary safety checks to be performed in the garage. Accordingly,
there will be no adverse impact on the public health, safety, morals,
comfort or general welfare.
2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish
and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located.
The surrounding uses and the existing approved operation are such that
the construction of the garage will not be injurious to these surrounding
uses nor substantially dimL~h and impair property values in the area.
3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and
orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the
district.
The cartage and express facility is an approved conditional use. The
surrounding uses are industrial in nature and the proposed garage will
not impede the normal and orderly development of the surrounding
property. The proposed use is in conformance with the existing
developments in the area and will continue to complement those existing
uses.
4. TI/at adequate public ulilities, access roads, drainage andJor necessary facilities
have been or will be provided~
The existing public utilities, access roads, and drainage will be uMl{zed by
the Petitioner and ~ be adequate to serve its needs.
5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so
designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets.
As stated above, this is an industrial area. The site is served by Terminal
Drive. Currently, the site is uHli~ed for an approved cartage facility. The
proposed use will not detrimentally impact traffic congestion in the area
as it will not increase traffic for the already permitted use.
6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current
Comprehensive Plan for the Village.
The current Comprehensive Plan calls this area out for industrial uses.
The proposed garage is not contrary to the objectives of the current
Comprehensive Plan.
7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable
regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be
modified pursuant to the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The proposed garage will conform with all setback requirements.
.~ L'~ I ?' Busse Road
Site .Plan
ORDINANCE NO, 5039
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2400 TERMINAL DRIVE
· Passed and approved by
the President and Board of Trustees
the 17th day of August, 1999
Published in pamphlet form by
authority of the corporate
authorities of the Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois, the
18th day of August, 1999
WNL
8/7199
8/10/99
ORDINANCE NO. 5(3t~
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2400 TERMINAL DRIVF
WHEREAS, Maggie Fillman/Roadrunner Express, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed a petition for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 2400 Terminal Drive,
(hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
That part of the SW~ of Section 23, Township 41 N, Range 11 E of the Third Principal
Meridian described as: commencing at the SE comer of the said SW¼ of Section 23;
thence north on the north-south % section line 670.7'; thence west on a line parallel with
the south line of said SW%, 1,651.65' to the point of beginning; thence continuing west on
a line parallel to the south line of said SW%, 275'; thence north along a line forming an
angle of 90° 01' 40", measured countemlockwise from the last described course 60';
thence west on a line parallel to the south line of said SW~,A, 63.82'; thence north along a
line parallel to the north-south % section line 300.04'; thence east on a line parallel to the
south line of said SW%, 333.7'; thence south along a line forming an angle of 90° 01'40",
measured clockwise from the last described course, 360' to the point of beginning, except
the south 60' of the east 275' thereof (known as Terminal Drive) in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to construct a cartage facility with accessory
office and warehousing uses; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was.held on the request for Conditional Use being the subject of ZBA
Case No. 20-99 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 22"~
day of July; 1999, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect
Journal & Tooics on the 7~ day of July, 1999; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the
President and Board of Trustees tn support of the request being the subject of ZBA 20-99; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount. Prospect have given
consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the
Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be in the best interest of the
Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OP TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
~ The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the
President and Board of Trustees of the. Village Of Mount Prospect.
~ The President and BOard of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prosoect do hereby
grant a 'Conditional .Use, as provided, in'Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the
construction ora cartage facility with accessory office.and warehousing uses, as shown onthe Site
Plan. a copy of which Is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as EXhibit 'A.'
ZBA 20-99
Page 2/2
~TIQ~L~[~ That pdor to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use,
the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled:
1. Pdor to issuance of a building permit, the Petitioner shall submit a landscape plan for the
site including, at a mlnimum, the landscape areas and materials shown in Exhibit "B";
2. Pdor to issuance of a building permit, the Petitioner shall submit a paving striping plan to
provide a minimum of nine (9) total parking spaces, inc{uding at least one handicapped
accessible, to the property, in general conformance with Exhibit 'B";
3. Remove the existing concrete base, previously used for oil tanks;
4. Provide a concrete dumpster pad and dumpster enclosure to the site;
5. Petitioner will comply with requirements by Village staff for improving the exterior
appearance of the existing structures;
6. Hours of operation for th~ use shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
SECTION FOUR: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified
copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
.~E_C_TJ_O.J~F_LV~ This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES: Corcoram, Eoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowro~, Wllk$
NAYS: No~e
ABSENT: Nocchi
PASSED and APPROVED this. 17th day of August ,1999.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMLYN~[I'Y DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-2000 - 1104 CHURCH STREET ~ f
VARIATION TO PERMIT A POOL AND DECK TO ENCROACH INTO A REQUIRED REAR
SETBACK AND INTO A REQUIRED EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK
KATHY AND ROBERT GRII>PO - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-16-2000, a request to construct
an in-ground swimming pool eight feet into the required 15 foot rear setback and three feet into the required 20 foot
exterior side yard setback. The subject parcel is a 10,106 square foot rectangular and relatively level parcel that is out
of any flood zone. The parcel is developed with a single family home and a detached garage.
The applicant appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals at the May 26, 2000 meeting and requested a variation to
construct a 16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a 4' concrete deck in the rear and exterior yards. The Zoning Board
requested the applicant to revise the proposal to eliminate or greatly reduce the exterior sideyard Variation. Mr.
Grippo appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on 3rune 22 to present the modified request. The applicant
proposed to locate the pool with a surrounding four-foot wide concrete deck seven feet into the required exterior yard.
The applicant has offered to reduce the width of the deck to three feet in the exterior side yard, which is a permitted
encroaehrnent. Therefore, only the pool would require a variation, as it would be located three feet into the required
20-foot setback and 8' into the rear yard.
As detailed in the first staff report (attached), no particular condition of the lot makes the proposed encroachment
necessary. In addition, the petitioner could conslruct a pool without the proposed Variations by shifting the location of
the pool closer to the house and reducing the width of the surrounding concrete deck to three feet on all sides of the
pool. The applicant has indicated that a smaller pool does not meet their needs and that moving the pool would require
removal of their patio.
ZBA members indicated their appreciation that the petitioner revised the proposal to bring the request more in line
with Village Code requirements. They felt that the proposed fence would screen the pool and limit the visual impact
of the encroachment In the required setbacks. Based on those facts, the ZBA found that the requested Variations met
the Zoning Code Standards for Variations, and voted 4-0 to recommend approval of Case No. ZBA-16-2000.
~ William 3r. Cooney 3rt., AICP
/lC
\\VHW02'OI~PTCOMDEV~EN~LNG~21~AkZBA 2000kMEI MenmskZBA-I 6-2000 (gfippo r~siden~).doc
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-16-2000 Hearing Date: June 22, 2000
PETITIONER: Bob & Kathy Grippo
I 104 S. Church Road
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7, 2000, DAILYHER/iLD
REQUEST: Variation to permit the construction of a swimming pool that would encroach
8' into the minimum 15' rear yard setback and T into the minimum 20' side
exterior yard setback required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Fluros
Elizabeth Luxem
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community DeVelopment
Judy Connolly, Seninr Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Bob Grippo
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Case ZBA-16-2000, a request for a Variation to permit the construction of a
swimming pool that would encroach 8' into the minimum 15' rear yard setback and 7' into the minimum 20' side
exterior yard setback required by Code. Ms. Juracek stated that this case had come before the May 25 meeting but
ZBA members had found it difficult to support therequested two variations. They had suggested a shorter pool with a
narrower deck, set back further from the exterior side yard. ZBA members asked the petitioner to come forward at the
next Zoning Board meeting with an adjusted request, and the case was tabled to this meeting.
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the amended request for Variations. She stated that the subject property is
an existing single-story home on an 84' X 120' lot on a residential street and with a rear setback of approximately 40'.
Ms. Connolly described the petitioner's proposal to construct a 16' X 32' pool. The revisions show that the pool will
be 13' from the exterior sid~)ard where cJod~ requires 20', 'and 7' from the rear 10t line where the code requires 15'. The
pool will be surr¢unded by a 4~ concrete deck in the rear yard. She pointed out that the actual encroachment into the
sideyard by the pool would be 3' with the4' deck making a 7' encroachment. Staff continues to find that the submittal
does. not support a finding of a hardship and, therefore, recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board
denial of ~ proposed V~ariations to p~nnit'a pool to encroach eight (8) feet into the required 15' rear setback and
sevefi feet (7) into the requlred'20' exterior side setback for the residence at 1104 Church Street, Case No2 ZBA-16:
2000. The Village Board's d'~cision is final for this case. :
Bob Grippo was sworn.in and testified that he had changed his'plans and.moved the proposed pool 3' .to the.no~h. He
stated his contractor told him that was the best he could do without ripping out the existing patio. He Raid this change
puts the pool within 3' of the sideyard setback.
Michael Blue responded that a 3~ Carriage walk is a permitted encroachment in the yard. The applicant is proposing a
4' deck, if the deck were reduced to 3', it could be considered a carriage walk 'and that would be. a permitted
encroachment. Mr. Blue said the 3~ of the deck itself could be in the yard.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 16-2000
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson Page 2
Mr. Grippo said the 4' deck could be ent down to 3' on the south side of the pool. He said that would put the pool
within 3' of the 20' setback. He said he would put ora 5' pr,vacy fanee and would not need to rip out the patio and not
be too close to the back door of his house. Mr. Grippo said that he did not want to reduce the size of the pool any
more, as it will be a small size, just 17,000 gallons.
Arlene Juraeek said she was heartened to hear that Mr. Grippo was willing to reduce the deck to 3~. She said it makes
the requested variation less egregious. She reminded the petitioner thai, at the last meeting, the Board had not been
concerned about the encroachment into the rear setback but the sideyard is really on the street and that the Board was
concerned with how that would work. By shortening the deck to 3' on that end, it can be considered as just a 3'
enernaehment on the sideyard, which would be a significant improvement,
Mr. Grippo said that there would be ho. diving board, and that the pool would be just 6' at the deep end. He asked if
any Board members had seen the pool at 1026 Church, which is similar to what he plans to do with his area. He also
said that the pool has been there for 13 years, is 6' from sidewalk, and that there have been no complaints.
Leo Floros said he had gone to see the neighbor's property and could barely see the pool. Mr. Floros asked Mr. Grippo
if his neighbors objected to the plan. Mr. Grippo said no, they wanted him to put in the pooL.
Ms. Juracek said the neighbors had two opportunities to voice any objection, as this was the second hearing of the
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval of Case ZBA- 16-200(1, a Variation to permit the construction of a
swimming pool that would encroach 8' into the minimum 15' rear yard setback and 3' into the minimum 20' side
exterior yard setback, with the condition that petitioner reduce the width of the deck along the sideyard from 4' to 3'.
Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Ftoros, Luxem, Youngquist, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
~Barbara Swiatek;Planning Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-2000 - 1104 CHURCH STREET
VARIATIONS TO PERMIT A POOL AND DECK TO ENCROACH EIGHT FEET INTO A
REQUIRED REAR SETBACK AND TiiN FEET INTO A REQUIRED EX'I'P_zP, IOR SIDE FRONT
SETBACK
The applicant appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals at the May 26, 2000 meeting and requested a variation to
construct a 16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a 4' concrete deck in the rear and exterior yards. The applicant revised the
request and proposes to locate the pool with surrounding 4' concrete deck seven (7) feet into the required exterior yard
and eight (8) feet into the rear yard.
As detailed in the first staff report (attached), no particular condition of the lot makes the proposed encroachment
necessary. In addition, the petitioner could construct a pool without the proposed Variations by shifting the location of
the pool closer to the house and reducing the width of the surrounding concrete deck to 3'.
RECOMMENDATION
Although the proposed Variation may not have a negative effect on neighborhood character, the submittal does not
support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board denial of the proposed
Variations to permit a pool to encroach eight (8) feet into the required 15' rear setback and seven feet (7) into the
required 20' exterior side setback for the residence at 1104 Church Street, Case No. ZBA-16-2000. The Village
Board's decision is £mal for this case. ·
I concur:
Willi~J.~Coo~e~, AI~,~' ~tor of Community Development
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development D pa ent
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNE~
DATE: MAY 19, 2000
HEARING DATE: MAY 25, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-2000 - 1104 CHtJRCH STREET
VARIATIONS TO PERMIT A POOL AND DECK TO ENCROACH EIGHT FEET INTO A
REQUIRED REAR SETBACK AND TEN FEET INTO A REQUIRED EXIERIOR SIDE
FRONT SETBACK
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Kathy and Robert C~ppo
1104 Church Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owners of the Property
Parcel Number: 08-14-317-008
Lot Size: 10,106 square feet
Existing Zoning: R1 Single Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage: 31% existing
42% proposed
45% maximum per R1 district
Requested Action: Proposal for a Variation to allow a pool and deck to encroach l0 feet into the required 20' extefiorside
setback and eight feet into the required 15' rear setback.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property is an existing single-stoE¢ home located on an 84'2 5/8" X 120' (10,106 square feet) single-
family lot on a residential street. The existing house has a rear setback of approximately 40'.
The petitioner is seeking to construct a 16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a. 4' concrete deck in the rear yard. The
applicant chose the proposed pool location to locate it away from the rear door of the house and the exis~ng patio. The
proposed location of the pool and deck would encroach by 10 feet into the 20' minimum exterior side yard setback and
by eight feet into the 15' minimum rear yard setback required by the R1 district.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of sur~,ey and site plan and
visited the site.
ourn Prospect Zoning Board o['Appculs
Meeting of May 25.2(XX)
ZBA- 16-2000 Page 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards
Required findings for all Variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. These
standards relate to:
A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not
generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently
having an interest in the property;
c~ lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
u protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The subject parcel is a I0,106 square foot rectangular and relatively level parcel that is out of any flood zone. The
parcel is developed with a single family home and a detached garage. The applicant proposes to construct a pool and
deck that would encroach significantly into the required rear and exterior side setbacks.
The reasons for the proposed Variation are for the convenience of the petitioner, rather than financial. The applicant
proposes the encroachments to provide for the largest possible patio area and to keep the proposed pool away fi.om the
rear door of the house. The proposed addition would not be likely to have a negative effect on the character of the
existing single-family residential area or the public welfare.
Notwithstanding the above, no particular condition of the lot, makes the proposed encroachment necessary. The
petitioner could construct a pool in the rear yard without the proposed Variations. The proposed pool encroaches by
six feet into the exterior side setback and the deck by four additional feet. By mov~g the pool six feet to the north and
reducing the width of the deck to three feet at the south end of the pool (sidewalks up to 3' in width may encroach into
setbacks), the proposed pool and deck would meet the exterior side yard setback requirement. Similarly, the pool
could be moved closer to the house and the width of the deck reduced to meet the required 15' rear yard setback.
Neither of those changes would require reducing the size of the proposed pool. By the above standards, no hardship
that would justify the proposed Variations exists.
R~COMM~NDATION
Although the proposed Variation may not have a negative effect on neighborhood character, the submittal does not
support a £mding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board denial of the proposed
Variations to permit a pool to encroach eight feet (8') into the required !5' rear setback and ten feet (10') into the
required 20' exterior side setback for the residence at 1104 Church Street, Case No. ZBA-16-2000. The Village
Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur:
William $./Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development
/$?
mmrrzs ov ov
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-16-2000 Hearing Date: May 25, 2000
PE'IIrIONER: Bob & Kathy Grippo
1104 S. Church Road
PIJBLICATION DATE: May 8; 2000 D. dlLYHER,,1LD
REQUEST: Variation to permit the construction of a swimming pool that would encroach
8" iht0 the minimum 15' rear yard setback and 10' into the minimum 20' side
exterior yard setback required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Lea Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
ME1VIIIERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Bob, Kathy & Klm Grippo
Nick & Lorraine Diakoumis
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed,indefinitelY. At 7:40, after hearing another case, Ms. Juracek introduced
Case ZBA-16-2000, a request for a Variation to permit the construction of a swimming pool that would encroach 8'
into the minimum 15' roar yard setback and 10' into the minimum 20' side exterior yard setback required by Code.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided through the newspaper, mailing and
signs on the property. He indicated that the subject property is an existing single-story home on an 84' X 120' lot on a
residential street and with a rear setback of approximately 40'. He described the petitioner's proposal to construct a
16' X 32' pool, surrounded by a 4' concrete deck in the rear yard. He stated that the proposed location of the pool and
deck would encroach I0' into the 20' exterior side setback and eight feet into the 15' rear setback required by the R1
district.
Mr. Perkins outlined the petitioner's reasons for the proposed Variation. He stated that the petitioner's motivation for
the roquest is to retain most of their existing patio and to keep the proposed pool away from the rear door of the house.
He stated that, although the proposed pool would not be likely to have a negative effect on the neighborhood or public
welfare, no particular condition of the lot makes the proposed encroachment necessary. He described how the
petitioner could censtmct a pool in the rear yard .without the proposed Variations and added that, for that reason, no
hardship exists.
Based on the lack cfa hardship, Mr. Perkins gave Staff's reCOmmendation.of denial of the proposed Variations and
added that the Village Board's decision is final for this' cas~.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 16-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Bob Grippo was sworn in and testified that he had lived in his home for seventeen years and explained what he wanted
to do concerning installing an in ground pool in his yard. He pointed out a similar situation at 106 Church Road,
where a Variation was granted several years ago. He said none of his neighbors objected to his plan~
Nick Diakoumis, I103 S. Church Rd., was sworn in, stated Mr. G-rippo maintains his property impeccably, and his
proposed request would add value to the neighborhood and Mount Prospect if granted.
ZBA members indicated they found it difficult to support two rather significant variations. They had several
suggestions for the proposal, particularly that it should be set back further from the exterior side yard. A shorter pool
with a narrower deck was also suggested. ZBA members asked the petitioner to discuss the recommended revisions to
his plans With staffand come for~ard at the next zoning Board meeting with an adjusted request.
Richard Rogers made a motion to table Case ZBA-16-2000, to allow the petitioner time to consider alternative plans.
Elizabeth Luxem seconded the motion~
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Case No. ZBA-16-2000 will be tabled to the June 22,2000 meeting.
At 9:20 p.m., after hearing three more cases, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers.
The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Michael Blu~ .....
Community Development Deputy Director
Robert Drive
Beechwood Drive
Grace Drive
~:y~ress tJnve
Lancaster Avenue
Linneman Road
: Robert and Kathleen Grippo
1104 South Church Road
Mt. Prospect, Il, 60056
June 8, 2000
Village Board Members,
This is a new proposal we are submitting as a result of the May 254
meeting. We are moving the entire deck and pool three feet north. Because
of this, the cement deck will start at thirteen feet, and the pool will start at
seventeen feet l~om the sidewalk. Our pool contractor suggested, at this
distance we could keep the same size pool and would not have to replace the
cement patio. We would also like to suggest to the board members to take a
look at the Pat Biedar residence, at 1026 Church, before the June 22aa
meeting. The pool has been there for over 15 years, and has mused no
problen~, to the neighbors or the neighborhood. 'We also ~ that by add~&q
ta pool will only help to increase the property values of the neighborhood.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER '~I~, ~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPIvl]ENT s,~ I i~[ I~
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-08-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO PERMIT OUTSIDE DINING IN THE~ 3, B4, AND
B5 ZONING DISTRICTS.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case Z13A-08-2000, a text amendment to permit
outdoor dining areas in the B3, B4, and B5 districts.
A review of the Zoning Code related to downtown and other developments revealed that the commercial districts of
the Zoning Code do not include outdoor dining areas as a permitted use. Section 14.301 specifies that uses not listed
as "Permitted," "Conditional," or "Permitted Under Limited Circumstances" in a particular Zoning District are
prohibited in that district. This provision would, technically, prohibit Outdoor Dining in the Central Business District
and elsewhere. Outdoor dining fosters the sort of activity and interaction encouraged by the TIF District Strategic Plan
and would be a desirable addition to the downtown. It should be noted that, if alcoholic beverages were to be served,
provisions of the Village Alcohol Code would still regulate outdoor dining areas in any of the affected zoning districts.
In addition, the amendment has specific provisions to limit possible impacts on residential areas. The proposed
changes are described in the attached ZBA staff memo.
The ZBA briefly discussed the proposed Amendments in terms of the Zoning Code S~mdards for Text Amendments and
voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Amendments, Case No. ZBA-08-2000.
William J. Cooney Jr., AICP
/JC
MI~qUTES OF T~E R~GULAR MEETING OF TItE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-08-2000 Hearing Date: June 22, 2000
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7, 2000 and April 10, 2000 D, dI£YHER,iLD
REQUEST: Text Amendments to the Zoning Code Section 14.1702 and 14.311
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Developmem
Judy Cormolly, SeniorPlanner
INTERESTED PARTIES: NOne
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. At 8:05, under Old Business, Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-08-2000, a request for Text Amendments
to the Zoning Code Section 14.1702 and 14.311
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper. Ms.
Connolly said that in conjunction with the downtown redevelopment, staffhas been reviewing that part oftbe Village
Code dealing with outside dining. The way the Code is written, outdoor dining is technically prohibited. Therefore,
staff has undertaken a text amendment to write this into the Code, as it would be a desirable addition to the district.
She pointed out that several restaurants now offer outside dining in the B-3 zoning district. They have not been a
nuisance to surrounding-neighborhoods. With the amendment, a plan would need to be submitted with the location of
the tables, distance from property line, hours of operation, and garbage pick-up consistent with our Code. The
furniture will need to be removed when not in use. Permission could be revoked with a 14 day notice. The permit
would be good for one year. Outdoor dining would be a positive attribute in the downtown and other B-3 areas. Staff
recommends approval of the Text Amendmem.
Ms. Juracek said that downtown Chicago outdoor cafes have shrubbery, greens, ere, to define the dining area. She
noted provisions for such definition are not included in this ordinance and asked if the landscape ordinance take care of
those needs.
Ms; Connolly answered that ifa physical barrier is needed it would be recommended on a.cas~ by caSe basis when the
plan- is submitted.
Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community DeVelopment, said that the. idea~ was not ~o put an extra onus on the
restaurant owner. If there is need to require barriers, it would 'be required at the time of the permit.
Keitlx Youngquist said he is heavily involved with'the ChiCago caf6"ordinance requirements, which are often too
burdensome~ 'He said he expectod the owners would work-with the Vilhge if they want to.offer this service,
· . Ms~ Juranoksmd we definitelyneed to attract peop[~o the doWntown area.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-08-2000
Arlene Sumcek, Chairperson Page 2
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval for a Text Amendment to Sections 14.1702 and 14.311 of the
Zoning Code. Elizabeth Luxem seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 4~0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Y0ungquist The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, planning Secretary
/~dS' o~, ~nior Planner
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOLrNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JUP, ACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JLrDy CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNEP~
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: yLrN'E 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-08-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO MODII~Y REGULATIONS FOR
OUTSIDE DINING AREAS IN THE B3, B4, AND B5 DISTRICTS.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
A. Modify Section 14.1702 B3 Zoning District Permitted Uses
Mod fy:
54. Restaurants, including entertainment~,.r,n,, dancing, and outside dining areas subieet to the requirements of
Section 14.311.B.
Add Section 14.311.B, as follows:
B. Outside dining areas shall be permitted oh the same zoning ldt as an established restaurant in the B-3, B-4,
or B-5 District, subject to the following requirements:
1. An application for the outside d~'mg area must be submitted to the Depa~ht~ent of Community
Development. The Department will conduct an administrative review of the application and the
Director will either approve or disapprove the application within 30 days from receipt. The application
shall contain, at a mimmun~ the following information:
a. Aplot plan showing location of the outside dining area;
b. Distances to all property lines;
c. Proposedhours of operation;
d. The clear width of all walkways and sidewalks adjacent to the outside dining area;
e. Photographs or other documentation showing the construction and appearance of all furniture to be
used in the outside dining area, including materials, colors, and wind pressure information;
f. Provisions for refuse disposal for the outside dining area;
2. Approved permits for outside dining areas shall be effective for a period Of One-year from the date of
approval.
3. Permits will be subject to an annual review and may be revoked by the Village ag any time .on fourteen
(14) days notice.
ZBA 08-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
4. Alt outdoor furnishings shall be constructed in such a manner to allow for their easy removal during
winter months and/or if required by the village.
5. All outdoor fumiture and appurtenances shall be designed to withstand a wind pressure of no less than
30 pounds per square inch minimum.
6. Colors and materials of outdoor furniture and other appurtenances shall be selected to be harmonious
with the principal structure and adjacent structures. Outdoor furniture and other appurtenances should
be constructed of durable materials, such as wrought iron. Use of lightweight materials, such as tubular
aluminum or plastic is discouraged.
7. The sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in the outside dining areas shall be subject to all
requirements of Chapter 11 of the Mount Prospect Village Code.
8. The proprietor shall provide adequate facilities for refuse disposal, as determined by the Environmental
Health Division.
9. The outdoor dining area shall not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of nearby residents of
persons working or shopping in the vicinity.
10. Outside dining areas shall be exempt from applicable parking requirements.
11. Advertising or promotional features in a permitted outside dining area shall be limited to umbrellas or
canopies, and shall be limited to no more than 15% of the surface area cfa canopy or umbrella.
12. Outside dining areas shall meet all applicable Village and State Health Requirements.
ANALYSIS
The Community Development Department is currently reviewing plans for Downtown Redevelopment Phase
IB. A part of this proposal is an outdoor dining area associated with a restaurant space in the building. A
review of the Zoning Code revealed that the commercial districts of the Zoning Code do not include outdoor
dining areas as a permitted use. Section 14.301 specifies that uses not listed as "Permitted," "Conditional," or
"Permitted Under Limited Circumstances" in a particular Zoning District are prohibited in that district. This
provision would, technically, prohibit Outdoor Dining in the Central Business District. As the sort of activity
and interaction fostered by outdoor dining is encouraged by the TIF District Strategic Plan, the use would be a
desirable addition to the district. That has prompted staff to propose this amendment.
Community Development staff has also encountered Several existing outside dining areas on B3 Zoned parcels
in the Village. As those areas have benefited the businesses and not~ been nuisances to surrounding
neighborhoods, staff has included the B3 district in the proposed change. The proposed change would also
affect the B4 and B5 Districts, which list as Permitted Uses all uses permitted in the B3 District. Among the
existing outdoor dining areas in the Village are Riva Bolla, Viva Zapata, and Photos (Brentwood Square), E1
Sombrero (Countryside Court), and East Side Mario's (Randhurst).
Outdoor dining areas in any of the affected zoning districts would still be regulated by provisions of the Village
Alcohol Code if alcoholic beverages were to be served. The requirements of the Code would prohibit serving
alcoholic beverages in an outside dining area within 300' of a residential property line. This would help to limit
possible impacts on residential areas.
STANDARDS FOR TEXT AM~ENDMENTS
Section 14.203.D.8.b lists standards for the Board to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code. The
standards relate to:
the general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel;
n consistency of the.amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan;
the degree to which.the amendment would create non-conformity;
the degree to which the amendment would make the Zoning Code more perrmssive; and
conslstency of the amendment with Village policy as established by-previous rulings.
BA 08-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 3
The proposed amendments am applicable to all parcels in the affected Zoning Districts and do not affect a
particular parcel. The amendments to the B3 District (and the resulting changes to the B4 and B5 disU'icts) will
not create any new non-conformity, as the proposed amendment adds a new Permitted Use. The changes will
make the code slightly more permissive, and will reflect actual practice throughout the Village. The
amendments would permit existing and future restaurants to add a new service to their customers. Existing
liquor laws will help to ensure that the changes do not impact residential areas. Thus the proposed amendments
are consistent with provisions of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Text
Amendments in Section 14.203.D.8.b. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed Text
Amendment.
I Concur,
W}lliam L Qooney, Jr., AIlCP
Director of Community Development
H:\GEN~LNG~ZBA'~BA 2000kStaff Memos~ZBA-0$-2000(Text Amendment-II).doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ / ]~/~)
DATE: JULY 14, 2000
HEARING DATE: JULY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-13-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR
PROVISIONS FOR PARKING LOT LIGHTING.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-13-2000, a text amendment that
establishes standards for parking lot lighting.
Community Development staff reviewed the Village's current lighting requirements. Current provisions regarding
parking lot lighting require that lights not glare onto adjacent properties so as to cause a nuisance and that businesses
extinguish their parking lot lights fi.om 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Staff reviewed lighting requirements used in nearby
communities, lighting ordinances fi.om other municipalities provided by the American Planning Association, and
model ordinances provided by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (I.E.S.) and other professional
organizations. The attached staff memo describes the specific changes and requirements that will allow the Village to
prevent complaints about commercial lighting but still provide adequate security using lights for businesses. The
proposed requirements would apply only when new parking lots are built, existing lots are expanded, or new lighting is
added to parking lots. The changes would not make the code more permissive and protects residents fi.om light
trespass, provides for security of users of parking lots, and maintains the Village's aesthetics.
The ZBA briefly discussed the proposed Amendments in terms of the Zoning Code Standards for Text Amendments and
voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Amendments, Case No. ZBA- 13-2000.
/JC
\\VHW02~DEPTCOMDEV~GEN~LNG~ZBAXZBA 2000RvlEI.Memos'~BA*13-2000 0ight standards - text amendm~0.doc
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-13-2000 He~ing Date: June 22, 2000
PETrrlONER: Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE: June 7 and April 10, 2000 D.4ILYHER,4LD
REQUEST: Text Amendment to Zoning Code Section 14.2219 to provide minimum
standards for parking lot lighting
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
EF~zabeth Luxem
Keith youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
Richard Rogers
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Judy Connolly, Senior Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Minutes of the May 25, 2000 meeting were
approved. At 8:10, after hearing two cases under New Business and another case under Old Business, Ms. Juracek
introduced Case ZBA-13-2000, a Text Amendment to Zoning Code Section 14.2219 to provide minimum standards
for parking lot lighting
Jud2 Connolly, Senior Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper. She stated
that Village Cede currently provides two guidelines for parking lot lighting: all the lighting must be kept on the
property and cannot "spill" onto surrounding properties, and parking lot lights must be turned offbctween the hours of
I lpm and 7am. The Police Department expressed concerns with the existing provisions, as the lighting can provide
security during the night. At the request of the Village Board, staff undertook a review of the Village's current lighting
requirements and now proposes this Text Amendment, which is based on other communities~ ordinances, the lighting
standards and model ordinances of the Illuminating Engineers Society of America (YES) and other professional
organizations. This proposed amendment would put the Village into a proactive situation where new applicants
proposing a parking lot would need to present a lighting plan, the glare and the luminaires of the proposed fixtures, and
the foot Candles of the pwposed fixtures to ensure code compliance. If there is a complaint from a neighbor or an
inconsistency with the code, the. Village can use a light meter to check for compliance. The Text Amendment is
intended to protect residents against light trespass, provide 'for security of parking lot users, and protect Village
aeslt/efics. Staff recommends appro3,al of the Text Amendment.
Arlene JUrncek pointed out that removal of the. r~quirement that parking lot lighting be turned off'from 1 lpm to 7am
did'not maiadate that the oWner, must leavothe lights .on during those hours. She said. these standards were a good
enhancement to the Code..
Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to:recommend approval, to allow Text Amendment to Zoning Code Section 14.2219.
'Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: - AYES: Flows, Luxem,:YoUngquist, and juracek
NAYS: None
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 13 -2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Motion was approved 4-0. Village Board's decision is final in this ease.
At 8:15 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
~C&{~i~y, S~-fi'ior Planner
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLA_NNER~(-.~
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 22, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-13-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM STANDARDS
FOR PROVISION OF PAR.KING LOT LIGHTING.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Proposed changes to Zoning Code Section 14. 2219
Modify:
See. 14.2219. Lighting.
All parking lots with more than four (4) spaces shall provide lighting. Artificial lighting used to illuminate any
parking lot shall comply with the regulations'as set forth in this Section.
A. General Requirements:
1. ~P01e height and material:
a. The height of light fixtUres shall be limited to tbe district h~ight' limit or a maximum .of 30'~
whichever is less:
.... ' b.' Light poles .qhall 'be oonstmcted .of metal, or other' materia} accentable to the Village Engineer.
Wood poles are prohibited.
2. Glare on[o adiacent properties p~ohibited: Eleclri¢ lighting used to illuminate off-street Parkingareas
' 6r driveways shall- be directed away from adiacent properties and fights-of-Way in such a way as to not.
ZBA 13-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 2
create a nuisance. The following standards shall be enforced to ensure that lighting does not glare onto
adjacent properties.
a. Cutoff luminaires with a total cutoff angle of not more than 90° shall be used in all locations. The
Director of Community Development may approve cutoff angles of greater than 90° or the use of
fixtures without cutoff luminaires upon submission of information conclusively demonstrating that
the proposed lighting will not cause glare on adjacent properties.
b. Light intensity at a property line abutting a residential property shall not exceed 0.1 footcandles.
c. Light intensity at a property line abutting a non-residential property or right-of-way shall not exceed
0.5 footcandles
3. Protection of lighting fixtures: Light poles in a parking lot shall be protected from vehicles by curbed
landscape islands or curbed landscape diamonds.
4. Illumination levels and uniformity: The following criteria for minimum illumination, maximum
illumination, and uniformity shall be met for all parking lots.
Type of Development Minimum I.E.S. Illumination Maximum I.E.S. Illumination Uniformity
Level (Footcandles) Level (Footcandles)
Multi-family 1.O 15.0 4:1 (ave./min.)
Residential 15:1 (max./min.)
Commercial 2.0 24.0 3:1 (ave./min.)
12:1 (max./min.)
Industrial 2.0 30.0 4:1 (ave./min.)
15:1 (max./min.)
Public, Semi-publie~ 2.0 24.0 3:1 (ave./min.)
and Institutional 12:1 (max./min.)
B. Lighting Plan required: The building permit submission for any non-residential development or multi-
family residential development shall include a lighting plan si~ned and sealed by a professional en~eer
and including~ at a minimum the following:
1. All property lines, building locations, dimensions of paved areas, and location of all curbs;
2. Fixture locations;
3. Fixture details and height;
4~ Photometric data for all paved areas at a spacing of not greater than 20' and not ~reater than 6" above
the pavement surface;
5. Photometric data at all property lines at a spacing of not greater than 50' and not greater than 6" above
grade;
6. Scale ofnotless than 1" to 50';
7. Details of the proposed light poles and foundations;
8. Exiting and proposed utilities on the subieet property and in right-s-of-way ad~ aeent to the subieet
property;
9. Other information~ as required.
ANALYSIS
Parking lot lighting has recently become a zomng priority for an inercasing number of Communities. Lighting
' can be an imPOrtant issue, for'seeurityand aesthetics. Light t~espass onto adjacent properties is also an important
issue. Communities need toinsure that public, commercial, and industrial parking areas are well-lit enough to
ZBA t3-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000 ~
Page 3
protect the security of the users. However, municipalities also. need to take steps to protect community
aesthetics and prevent light intrusion into nearby residential areas.
At the request of the Village Board, Community Development staff undertook a review of the Village's current
lighting requirements. Currently, the Village's Zoning Code has two provisions regarding parking lot lighting.
The code specifies that light is not to glare onto adjacent properties so as to cause a nuisance. The code also
requires that businesses extinguish their parking lot lights from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
The current codes do not specify a particular level of light that constitutes a "nuisance" and do not require
submission of a plan for lighting to give the Village an opportunity to prevent light trespass problems. Thus, the
Village's response to lighting problems is strictly reactive. When residents complain about lighting problems,
the Village investigates the complaint and attempts to solve the problem after the fact. Requiring submission of
a lighting plan with standards for light trespass will allow the Village to prevent problems before they occur.
The Police Department has expressed concern with the existing provision requiring lighting to be extinguished
during late night hours. The Depa~h,,ent states that maintaining lighting of sites during those hours is desirable
for security reasons and should not be discouraged. The Village has historically had this requirement, but at this
point, the requirement is eliminated from the proposed language.
Staff also reviewed lighting requirements used in nearby communities, lighting ordinances from other
municipalities provided by the American Planning Association, and model ordinances provided by the
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (I.E.S.) and other professional organizations.
The regulations used by other municipalities consist of several types of regulations:
ia Specifications for fixtures and fixture heights - these requirements generally include fixture height and
cutoff requirements, sometimes include specifications for particular types of light sources.
Minimum and maximum lighting intensity - these standards are typically measured in lumens,
footcandles, candela, or similar units
[a lJniformity of light intensity - This measures the evenness of lighting in the area in term of the ratio of
average intensity to minimum intensity, or sometimes the maximum intensity to minimum intensity.
u Limitation of light intrusion - Most area communities state that light is not to intrude onto adjacent
properties, without requiring speeiftc mechanisms for.pi'eventing intrusion. Most model ordinances
include a maximum light level at the property line and a requirement for a lighting plan to show the
light levels in the lot.
STANDARDS FOR TEXT AlVlEND1VIENTS
Section 14.203.D.8.b lists standards for the Board m consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code. The
standards relate to:
the general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than'an individual pamel;
consistency of the amendment With objective~ of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive'Plan;
thc degree to Which the amendment would create non,conformity;
. the'degree.to which the'amendment would make the Zoning Code more penmss~ve; and
consistency of the amendment.with Village policy as established by previous rulings.
' The prOposed amendments are applicable to all' parcels in the Village that will have parking lots,, and do not
affect a particular parcel. Tl~e amendments will create some new non,conformity, as the p .roposed amendment
· · ' changes' th~ Village's lighting standards. The extent of new non,conformity is difficult to:determine,~a~' lighting
plans are not available for many parking lots in the Village. However, the proposed requirements would apply
bnly when new parking lots are built; existing lots'expanded, or new lighting added tO parking lots. The changes.
BA 13-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of June 22, 2000
Page 4
would not make the code more permissive. The proposed amendmonts are consistent with the intent of existing
provisions of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan, that is to protect residents from light trespass, provide
for security of users of parking lots, and maintain th[ Village's aesthetics. The amendment would give the
Village a stronger set of tools to promote those goals.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Text
Amendments in Section 14.203.D.8.b. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed Text
Amendment.
I Concur,
Director of Community Development
\\VH\V02kDEPT~COM DEV~GEI-,~P LNGkZBAkZB A 2000~Staff MemosXZBA- 13-2000(Text Amendment).doe
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JULY 13, 2000
SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO VILLAGE CODE PERTAINING TO BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS
Attached are drai~ ordinances that reflect the recent discussion by the Village Board pertaining to the
duties and responsibilities of the various Village boards and commissions. These modifications are
intended to more accurately reflect the actual duties of these commissions and to improve the overall
review process of the Village. The major changes proposed include the following:
· The elimination of the Business District Development & Redevelopment Commission and the Sign
Review Board;
· The reduction of the number of Solid Waste Commissioners and Plan Commissioners fi.om nine to
seven for each commission;
· The modification of the duties of the Zoning Board of Appeals to establish their jurisdiction over all
sign related items previously handled by the Sign Review Board;
In addition, the Village Attorney has modified the overall duties and responsibilities of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and Plan Commission to reflect current trends. Please forward this memorandum and
attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at the July 18th meeting. Staff will be
in attendance to further discuss this matter.
~Wil~iam J C~oor e~y, Jr , AICP
WJC:bhs
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION '1: Chapter 5, Article II, entitled "Business District Development and
Redevelopment Commission" of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended by
deleting Article II in its entirety and reserving it.
SECTION 2: Chapter 5, Article Xlll, entitled "Sign Review Board" of the Mount
Prospect Village Code shall, be amended by deleting Article XIII in its entirety and
reserving it.
SECTION 3: Chapter 5, Article XI, entitled Solid Waste Commission, shall be
amended by inserting new subparagraphs (A) and (B) to Section 5.1101, Creation and
Purpose, which shall be and: read as follows:
A. The Solid Waste Commission shall consist of seven (7) members,
each of whom shall be residents of the Village and shall be
appointed by the Village President with the advice and consent of
the Board of Trustees. The Village President shall appoint the
Chairman of this Commission with the advice and consent of the
Board of Trustees. The Chairman shall serve no more than two (2)
consecutive terms as Chairman.
B. The term of office of each member of the Solid Waste Commission
shall be four (4) years.
SECTION 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
SECTION 5: That Article VII "Plan Commission" of Chapter 5 shall be deleted
in its entirety and a new Article VII, entitled "Plan Commission" of Chapter 5 shall be
inserted in lieu thereof and shall be and read as follows:
ARTICLE VII
PLAN COMMISSION
SECTION:
5.701. Creation and Membership
5.702. Organization
5.703. Jurisdiction
5.704 The Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect
5.705. Hearings, Meetings and Notice Provisions
Sec. 5.701. Creation and Membership.
The Plan Commission of the Village shall consist of seven (7) members, including a
Chair, all of whom shall be residents of the Village and shall be appointed by the Village
President with theconsent of the Board of Trustees. The Chair shall be designated by
the Village President with the advice and consent of the Board of Trustees and shall be
a deliberative and voting member of the Plan Commission.
A. Each member including the Chair shall serve for a term of four (4) years, or until
his or her successor has been duly appointed and qualified. The Chair shall
serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms as Chair.
B. Each member of the Plan Commission, including the Chair, shall serve at the
pleasure of the Village President and the Board of Trustees.
C. A vacancy on the Plan Commission shall be filled for the unexpired term of the
member whose seat has become vacant by appointment by the Village President
with the consent of the Trustees of the Village.
Sec. 5.702. Organization.
A. The President and Board of Trustees may provide by resolution for the
compensation of the members of the Plan Commission.
B. The Plan Commission shall select from its membership a Vice Chair.
C. The Vice Chair shall serve as acting Chair whenever the Chair appointed by the
Village President is absent from meetings and hearings.
D. The Plan Commission shall adopt rules for the conduCt of its hearings and
meetings, which rules shall not conflict with this Article and which may include
the creation of a committee authorized to conduct hearings at any time two (2) or
more members of the Plan Commission are present. Any procedural issues not
addressed by the adoption of such rules shall be governed by the most current
edition of Roberts Rules of Order.
E. In the case of meetings, a simple majority of the currently filled positions on the
Plan Commission shall constitute a quorum to conduct business.
Sec. 5.703. Jurisdiction.
The Plan Commission shall perform the following functions.
A. Prepare, amend and recommend to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village an Official Comprehensive Plan ("the Plan") for the present and future
development or redevelopment of the Village. The Official Comprehensive Plan
and its amendments shall be accomplished in accordance with Section 5.704 of
this Article.
B. To recommend changes, from time to time, in the Official Comprehensive Plan
after review and public hearing.
C. To give aid to the Municipal officials charged with the direction of projects for
improvements embraced within the Plan, and to generally promote the
realization of the Plan.
D. To review and recommend the denial or the approval of plats of subdivision.
1. No map or plat of any subdivision or resubdivision presented for
recording, affecting land within the corporate limits of the Village, or
contiguous territory outside of but not more distant than one and one-half
(1-2/) miles from such limits of the Village, shall be entitled to be recorded
or shall be valid unless the subdivision shall meet the subdivision
regulations as set forth in the Village's Development Code and otherwise
conform to any requirements shown in the Official Comprehensive Plan of
the Village.
2. The procedures for review of such maps or plats of subdivision shall be as
established within the subdivision regulations of the Village which are a
constituent part of the Development Code.
E. To make recommendations to the Village Board with respect to the Village's
planning processes.
F. To recommend regulations, projects and programs pertinent to the development,
redevelopment and renewal of the Village and such surrounding territory over
which the Village exercises subdivision jurisdiction.
G. To exercise such other powers as may be conferred upon the Plan Commission
by the Corporate Authorities.
Sec. 5-704. The Official Comprehensive Plan of the
Village of Mount Prospect
The Plan Commission shall carry out its responsibilities with respect to the Official
Comprehensive Plan according to the following:
A. After receiving a proposed Comprehensive Plan or an amendment to an existing
Comprehensive Plan, the Plan Commission shall hold a public hearing to
consider such amendment.
1. Not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice of the
proposed hearing, setting forth the time and date and place shall be given
by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the Village and the
contiguous unincorporated area.
2. The hearing may be recessed to another date if not concluded; provided,
notice of the time and place is publicly announced at the hearing at the
time of such recess or notice is given by newspaper publication not less
than five (5) days prior to the rescheduled hearing.
B. The Village Clerk shall, upon written request of the Plan Commission
Chairperson or Secretary, furnish the Plan Commission with copies of all
ordinances, plans and data relative to public improvements of any nature or
other plans affecting the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village. If the Plan
Commission deems a report to be necessary or advisable, it may make such
report to the President and Board of Trustees for its consideration.
C. No testimony regarding the Comprehensive Plan or any amendments shall be
taken, and no witnesses heard, except at a properly convened hearing of the
Plan Commission.
4
D. No Comprehensive Plan or amendment shall be adopted by the President and
Board of Trustees that has not been submitted to the Plan Commission for
review, public hearing and recommendation.
E. The Plan may be adopted in whole or in separate geographical or functional
parts, each of which, when adopted, shall be the Official Comprehensive Plan or
a constituent part of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village.
F. The Plan may include reasonable requirements with reference to streets, alleys,
public grounds and other public improvements.
G. The Plan by its very terms, may be made applicable to land situated within the
corporate limits of the Village and contiguous territory not more than one and
one-half (1-1/2) miles beyond the corporate limits of the Village.
H. The Plan may designate land suitable for annexation to the Village, along with
recommended zoning classification for such land upon annexation.
I. The Plan shall be the primary planning guide of the Village, but shall not be
construed to actually regulate or control the use of private property which is the
function of the Zoning Ordinance and Official Maps.
J. The Official Comprehensive Plan and any ordinances implementing it shall be on
file with the Village Clerk and shall be available at all times during regular
business hours for public inspection.
K. Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the public hearing held by the
Plan Commission, the Plan Commission shall make its written recommendation
to the President and Board of Trustees. If the Plan Commission fails to make
such written recommendation within ninety (90) days, then the President and
Board of Trustees may proceed to consider adoption of such Comprehensive
Plan or portion of the Comprehensive Plan or an amendment to an existing
Comprehensive Plan in the same manner as if the Plan Commission had made a
written recommendation.
1. After consideration of the recommendation of the Plan Commission of a
proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, the President and
Board of Trustees shall either adopt the Comprehensive Plan or
amendment in whole or in part or reject the entire Comprehensive Plan or
amendment.
2. If approved, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village shall enact
the ordinances necessary to give effect to the Plan.
3. If, at the expiration of one hundred eighty (180) days after the
recommendation of the Plan Commission to the President and Board of
Trustees, the President and Board of Trustees have taken no fo~rmal
action, the Comprehensive Plan or amendment may not be acted upOn by
the President and Board of Trustees without renewing the public notice
and public hearing process.
L. The Plan and its amendments, if approved and adopted, shall become effective
upon the expiration of ten (10) days after the date of filing notice of such
adoption with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds.
M. Copies of the Plan, all ordinances implementing it, and the official map, shall be
available to any interested party upon payment by the party of the sum
established to cover the cost of its printing and distribution.
Sec. 5.705. Hearings, Meetings and Notice Provisions.
A. General Provisions. All hearings and all meetings of the Plan Commission shall
be open to the public; the records and minutes of which shall be available for
examination in the office of the Village Clerk during regular business hours.
1. Generally, a hearing is a gathering of the Plan Commission, the purpose
of which is to take testimony from and permit comment by petitioners and
interested par[les. A meeting is a gathering at which the Plan
Commission deliberates and votes with respect to matters before it.
2. At the hearings and meetings of the Plan Commission any interested
person may appear in person or may be represented by duly authorized
agents or attorneys.
3. No testimony shall be taken and no witnesses may be heard, except at a
properly convened hearing of the Plan Commission.
C. Regular Meetings: Regular meetings of the Plan Commission shall be held in
the Village Hall on the first and third Wednesday of each month.
1. In the case of meetings, a simple majority of the currently filled positions
on the Plan Commission shall constitute a quorum to conduct business.
2. The Plan Commission shall keep minutes of its meetings and hearings
indicating the vote of each member upon every question or any absence
or failure to vote.
3. The concurring vote of a simple majority of those members present shall
be necessary to make a positive recommendation to the President and
Board of Trustees.
D. Special Meetings. All special meetings and all hearings of the Plan Commission
shall be held at the call of the Chairperson and at such other times as the Plan
Commission may determine by rule. All of the foregoing provisions regulating
the conduct of regular meetings of the Plan Commission shall: apply to special
meetings of the Plan Commission.
E. Hearings. A record of all testimony before the Plan Commission shall be
maintained for each hearing.
SECTION 6: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ., 2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
C:'~M yFiles\M P~ORDS~VI~Plan Corn.n ew2.ord,wpd
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 14, ARTICLE V OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION 1: That Chapter 14, Section 5, Article V "Zoning Board of Appeals"
of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be deleted in its entirety and a new Article V,
entitled "Zoning Board of Appeals" which shall be inserted in lieu thereof and shall be
and read as follows:
ARTICLE V
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
SECTION:
5.501. Creation and Membership
5.502. Organization
5.503. Hearings and Meetings
5.504. Jurisdiction
Sec. 5.501. Creation and Membership.
A Zoning Board of Appeals is hereby created. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall
consist of six (6) regular members as appointed by the Village President with the
consent of the Board of Trustees of the Village. In addition to the six regular members,
the Village President shall appoint, with the consent of the Trustees, a Chair who shall
be a deliberative and voting member of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
A. Each member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, including the Chair, shall serve
for a term of five (5) years or until his or her successor has been duly appointed
and qualified. The Chair shall serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms as
Ch'air.
B. Each member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, including the Chair, shall serve at
the pleasure of the Village President and Board of Trustees of the Village.
C. Vacancies on the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be filled for the unexpired term
of the member or the Chair whose seat has become vacant by appointment by
the Village President with the consent of the Board of Trustees of the Village.
Sec. 5.502. Organization.
A. The President and Board of Trustees of the Village may provide by resolution for
the compensation of the members and Chair of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
B. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall select from its membership a Vice Chair and
Secretary.
1. The Vice Chair shall serve serve as acting Chairperson whenever the
Chair is absent from meetings and hearings.
2. The Secretary shall oversee and shall be responsible for the filing of the
most current rules and procedure or rules of the Zoning Board of Appeals,
the minutes of meetings, the record of hearings and any memoranda of
decisions with the Village Clerk and the Zoning Administrator.
C. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall adopt rules for the conduct of its hearings
and meetings, which rules shall not conflict with this Article. Such rules may
include the creation of a committee authorized to conduct the appropriate
hearings at any time two (2) or more members of the Zoning Board of Appeals
are present.
1. In the case of meetings, however, the rules shall provide that business
may be conducted if a simple majority of the currently filled Zoning Board
of Appeals positions are present.
2. For the purpose of determining a quorum at meetings and members
present at hearings, the Chair shall be considered a member of the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
Sec. 5.703. Hearings and Meetings,
A. All hearings and meetings of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be open to the
public; the record and minutes of which shall be available for examination in the
office of the'Village Clerk during regular business hours.
1. Generally, a hearing is a gathering of the Zoning Board of Appeals. the
purpose of which is to take testimony from and permit comment by
petitioners and interested parties. A meeting is a gathering at which the
Zoning Board of Appeals deliberates and votes with respect to matters
before it.
2. At hearings and meetings of the Zoning Board of Appeals, any interested
person may appear in person or may be represented by duly authorized
agents or attorneys.
B. Regular meetings of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be held in the Senior
Citizen Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois on the fourth
Thursday of each month at the hour of seven thirty o'clock (7:30) P.M., or at
such other location, time or date as may be designated by the Chair of the
Zoning Board of Appeals, following proper notice as described in Section 14.203
of the Village Code.
1. No testimony shall be taken and no witnesses may be heard except at a
properly convened hearing of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
2. All testimony before the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be given under
oath and a summary of such testimony and proceedings shall be
subsequently prepared by the recording secretary. Any petitioner or other
interested party may provide at his or its own expense, a court reporter to
transcribe testimony given in any case so heard by the Zoning Board of
Appeals, provided that the Department of Community Development is
given a copy of the transcript.
3. The Chair or in the Chair's absence, the Vice Chairperson shall administer
or authorize the administration of oaths and may compel the attendance
of witnesses.
4. No vote of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be had at any hearing
unless the Zoning Board of Appeals shall by notice provide that such
hearing shall also be deemed a meeting and minutes of the hearing are
maintained by the Secretary.
5. The Director of Community Development is authorized to make such
additional charges as may be necessary to cover the costs of the Village
in the event the filing fees are insufficient to cover the cost of the
application, review and hearing.
C. All meetings of.the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be held at the call ofthe Chair
and .at such.other times.as the said Zoning Board of Appeals may determine by
rule.
3
1. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall keep minutes of its meetings,
indicating the vote of each member upon every question or any absence
or failure to vote.
2. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall make its decision or its determination
on all matters presented to it within a reasonable time. The following shall
apply to such decision making:
a. The Zoning Board of Appeals may reverse or confirm, wholly or
partly, or may modify or amend any order, requirement, decision or
determination, appealed from to the extent and in the manner the
Board may decide to be fitting and proper, subject to the provisions
contained in this Article, Chapter 14 (Zoning) of this Code or under
applicable State Law.
(1) The concurring vote of four (4) members of the Zoning
Board of Appeals shall be necessary to reverse any order,
requirement, decision or determination of the Zoning
Administrator.
(2) The concurring vote of a simple majority of those members
of the Zoning Board of Appeals in attendance (so long as a
quorum is present) shall be necessary to recommend or
grant a variation from Chapter 14 (Zoning) of this Code, or to
recommend or decide in favor of the petitioner on any matter
upon which the Zoning Board of Appeals is required to pass
under Chapter 14 (Zoning) of this Code or any other
ordinance of the Village.
b. In all instances where the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals
is final, such decision shall I~e a final administrative determination
and shall be subject to review by a court of law in the manner
provided by applicable Illinois statutes.
3. Any exhibits containing plans and specifications for the proposed use
shall remain part of the permanent records of the Zoning Board of
Appeals.
D. All special hearings of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be held at the call of
the Chair and at such other times as the said Zoning Board of Appeals may
determine. All of the foregoing rules and regulations governing .the conduct of
regular headngs before the Zoning Board of Appeals. shall apply.to special
hearings of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
4
Sec. 5.504. Jurisdiction.
The Zoning Board of Appeals is hereby vested with the following jurisdiction and
authority and it shall be its duty:
A. To hold public hearings on requests for amendments to Chapter 14 of this Code
and forward its findings and recommendations on such requests to the President
and Board of Trustees of the Village.
B. To hear and decide appeals from any order, requirement, decision or
determination made by the Zoning Administrator in the administration or
enforcement of Chapter 14 (Zoning)of this Code.
C. To hear and decide or forward recommendations as is appropriate for variations,
conditional uses and/or relief from the regulations and restrictions contained in
Chapter 14 of this Code.
D. To hear and decide or make recommendations on such other matters as may be
committed to the jurisdiction of the Zoning Board of Appeals by other ordinances
of the Village or at the direction of the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village.
E. To hear and decide all requests for exceptions, variations, special uses and
appeals pursuant to Chapter 7, Sign Regulations.
SECTION 2: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Fadey, Village President
ATTEST:
5
Velma W. Lowe~ Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, IllinOis
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~1 ~I~t11~
FROM: VILLAGE CLERK VELMA W. LOWE
DATE: JULY 12, 2000
SUBJECT: COST INCREASE FOR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS
On July 1, 1984, the Illinois Freedom of Information Act took effect, having been approved
by the State of Illinois in the fall of 1983.
On August 7, 1984, the Mount Prospect Village Board approved Resolution No. 40-84,
establishing guidelines relative to response procedures, information required on Freedom
of Information request applications, and fees for various public records.
While reviewing the resolution a few weeks ago, I noticed that several of the fees listed
have increased over the years, which creates the need for an amendment to that
resolution. The specific items affected are the Village Code, which is listed at $25 but is
now sold for $100, and the Zoning Ordinance (Code)with map, listed at $10 but is now
sold for $15. This is primarily a housekeeping measure; simply updating official records
to reflect our current practices.
Now that the Village Code is available on our web site, the number of requests we receive
in the office has decreased considerably, so it is obvious that the residents are taking
advantage of the opportunity to obtain information without the official requests and
procedures previously required:
I have discussed the proposed amendments with Village Manager Michael Janonis, and
it is our recommendation that a resolution be approved to amend Resolution No. 40-84,
at the July 18, 2000 Village. Board meeting, will be available to address any concerns.
~'J~/"Vel~a W e~"
VWL/
7/6/00
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 40-84
RELATIVE TO THE ILLINOIS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AC'['
WHEREAS, on August 7, 1984, the Village of Mount Prospect adopted Resolution No. 40-84
establishing rules and procedures for implementation of the Illinois Freedom of Information Act; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution established fees for actual costs incurred in providing public
information upon request; and
WHEREAS, as a result of cost increases incurred with the reproduction of such information, the
Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect deem it necessary to amend that section
of Resolution No. 40-84, as it relates to fees to be charged for the fulfillment of Freedom of
Information requests.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK, COUNTY, ILLINOIS;
SECTION ONE: That SECTION FIVE entitled "Fees" of Resolution No. 40-84 is hereby
amended by deleting SECTION FIVE.A. in its entirety and replacing it with the following SECTION
FIVE.A. so that hereafter said SECTION FIVE.A. of Resolution 40-84 shall read as follows:
"SECTION FIVE: Fees
A. Persons requesting Village records shall be charged for the actud costs incurred in
reproducing, certifying, or otherwise providing the requested public records,
according to the following schedule:
1. Photocopies $ .25 per page
2. Certified copies 1.00 per document
3. Computer printouts .25 per page
4. Printed documents
a. Village Code 100.00
b. Building Code (Chapter 21) 5.00
c. Development Code (Chapter 16) 5.00
d. Zoning Code (Chapter 14) 10.00
e. Zoning Map 5.00
f. Village Budget 25.00
g. Landlord/Tenant Ordinance .50
h. Comprehensive Plan 5.00
i. Comprehensive Plan Map 2.00
j. Copy (paper) of Plat 2.00
k. Copy (mylar) of Plat 1.00 per square foot
Page 2/2
Amend Res. 40-84, FOI
SECTION TWO: That Resolution No. 40-84, approved by the Mayor and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect on August 7, 1984, is hereby amended.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\G E N~files\WIN\RES~OI Resolution, 40-84,Amend SS,doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS '~- ~ '~)
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JULY 12,2000
SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF A TIF REGISTRY
PURPOSE:
To present for the Village Board's consideration an ordinance authorizing the establishment of a tax
increment financing "Interested Parties" registry and adoption of registration rules for such registry.
BACKGROUND:
The recently passed TIF Reform Act (P.A. 91-478) requires all municipalities with tax increment
financing districts to create a system for registering residents and organizations that are interested in
one or more of the municipality's tax increment districts and notifying them of certain TIF
establishment and amendment actions and the availability of key TIF documents and annual reports
associated with TIF's.
DISCUSSION:
The accompanying ordinance and registration rules meet both the legal requirements and intent of the
Statute.
Once the Village adopts the Registry ordinance and establishes the registration rules, the TIF Reform
Act requires us to publish a notice in a newspaper of general cimulation that interested persons and
organizations active within the municipality may register with the Village to receive the above notices
and information.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Board adopt the ordinance establishing the TIF Interest Persons Registry and
adopting the registration rules.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
l:\TIF\corresp\P,.Egistry memo.doc
?
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING "INTERESTED PARTIES" REGISTRIES
AND ADOPTING REGISTRATION RULES FOR SUCH REGISTRIES
ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect (the "Village") is a home rule municipality as
described in Section § 6(a). Ar[icle VII of the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois, and as such
may exercise any power and function pertaining to its government and affairs;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section § 11-74.4-4.2 of the Tax Increment Allocation
Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS § 5/11-74.4-1, et seq. (the "TIF Act"), the Village is required to
establish certain "interested parties" registries and adopt registration rules for such registries;
WHEREAS, the Village desires to adopt this ordinance in order to comply with such
requirements of the TIF Act; now, therefore
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING PURSUANT TO ITS
HOME RULE POWERS;
SECTION 1. The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 2. The Village's Director of Finance, or his or her designee, is
authorized and directed to create an "interested parties" registry in accordance with Section § 11-
74.4-4.2 of the Act for each redevelopment project area created under the Act and not terminated
by the Village, whether now existing or created after the date of the adoption of this ordinance.
SECTION 3. In accordance with Section § 11-74.4-4.2 of the Act, the
registration rules attached as Exhibit A for each such "interested parties" registry are adopted.
The Village Manager, upon approval of the Village Attorney as to form and legality, shall have the
authority to amend such registration rules from time to time as may be necessary or desirable to
comply with and carry out the purposes intended by the Act.
SECTION 4. If any provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or
unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect
'any of the other provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 5. All ordinances, resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage.
AYES:
NAYES:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
Attachment:
Exhibit A: TIF Interested Parties Registry Registration Rules
2
EXHIBIT A
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
DOWNTOWN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
TIF INTERESTED PARTIES REGISTRY REGISTRATION RULES
A. Definitions. As used in these Registration Rules, the following terms shall have the
definitions set forth below.
"Act" shall mean the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act 65 ILCS § 5/11-74.4-1
et seq. As amended from time to time.
"Village" shall mean the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, a home rule unit of
government under Section § 6(a) Article VII of the 1970 Constitution of the State of
Illinois.
"Interested Party(s)" shall mean (a) any organization(s) active within the Village, (b) any
resident(s) of the Village, and (c) any other entity or person otherwise entitled under the
Act to register in a specific Registry who has registered in such Registry and whose
registration has not been terminated in accordance with these Registration Rules.
"Redevelopment Project Area" shall mean a redevelopment project area that (a) is
intended to quality (or has subsequently qualified) as a "redevelopment project area"
under the Act and (ii) is subject to the "interested parties" registry requirements of the Act.
"Registration Form" shall mean the form appended to these Registration Rules or such
revised form as may be approved by the Village consistent with the requirements of the
Act.
"Registry'~ or "Registries" shall mean each Interested Parties Registry, and all such
registries, collectively, established by the Village pursuant to Section § 11-74.4-4.2 of the
Act for the Redevelopment Project Area.
B. Establishment of Re~]istrv The Village shall establish a separate interested parties
registry for each Redevelopment Project Area, whether existing as of the date of the
adoption of these Rules or hereafter established. The Village shall establish a new
registry whenever it has identified an area for study and possible designation as a
Redevelopment Project Area. In any event the process of establishing the new registry
must be completed prior to the deadline for sending any of the notices required by
Section (J) of these rules or any other notices required by the Act with respect to the
proposed Redevelopment Project Area.
C. Maintenance of Reqistry The Registries shall be maintained by the Village's Director of
Finance or his or her designee. In the event the Village determines that a person other
than the Director of Finance should maintain the Registries, the Village may transfer the
responsibility for maintaining the Registries to such other individual provided that the
Director of Finance (i) gives prior written notice to all Interested Parties not less than thirty
(30) days prior to such transfer and (ii) publishes notice of such transfer in a newspaper
of general circulation in the Village.
D. Registration by Residents An individual seeking to register as an Interested Person with
respect to a Redevelopment Project Area must complete and submit a Registration Form
to the Director of Finance. Such individual must also submit a copy of a current driver's
license, lease, utility bill, financial statement or such other evidence as may be
acceptable to the Director of Finance to establish the individual's current Village
residency.
E. Reeistration by Oroanizafions An organization seeking to register as an Interested
Person with respect to a Redevelopment Project Area must complete and submit a
Registration Form to the Director of Finance. Such organization must also submit a copy
of a one-page statement describing the organization's current operations in the Village.
F. Determination of Eligibility All individuals and organizations whose Registration Form
and supporting documentation complies with these Registration Rules shall be registered
in the applicable Registry within ten (10) business days of the Director of Finance's
receipt of all such documents. The Director of Finance shall provide written notice to the
registrant confirming such registration. Upon registration Interested Parties shall be
entitled to receive all notices and documents required to be delivered under these Rules
or as otherwise required under the Act with respect to the applicable Redevelopment
Project Area. If the Director of Finance determines that a registrant's Registration Form
and/or supporting documentation is incomplete or does not comply with these
Registration Rules, he or she shall give written notice to the registrant specifying the
defect(s). The registrant shall be entitled to correct any defects and resubmit a new
Registration Form and supporting documentation.
G. Renewal and Termination An Interested Person's registration shall remain effective for
a period of three years. At any time after such three year period the Director of Finance
may provide written notice by regular mail to the Interested Person stating that such
registration shall terminate unless the Interested Person renews such registration within
thirty (30) days of the Director of Finance's mailing of written notice. To renew such
registration, the Interested Person shall, within such thirty (30) day period, complete and
submit the same Registration Form and supporting documentation then required of initial
registrants in order to permit the Director of Finance to confirm such person's residency
or such organization's operations in the Village. The registration of ail individuals and
organizations whose Registration Form and supporting documentation is submitted in a
timely manner and compiles with these Regulation Rules shall be renewed for an
additional, consecutive three year period. If the Director of Finance determines that a
registrant's renewal Registration Form and/or supporting documentation is incomplete or
does not comply with these Registration Rules, he or she shall give written notice to the
registrant at the address specified in the renewal Registration Form submitted by such
registrant, specifying the defect(s). The registrant shall be entitled to correct any defects
and resubmit a new Registration Form and supporting documentation within thirty (30)
days of receipt of the Director of Finance's notice. If all defects are not corrected within
thirty (30) days of the Interested Person's receipt of the Director of Finance's notice, the
Interested Person's registration shall be terminated. Any Interested Person whose
registration is terminated shall be entitled to register again as if a first-time registrant.
H. Amendment to Reaistration An Interested Party may amend its registration by giving
written notice to the Director of Finance by certified mail of any of the following: (i) a
change in address for notice purposes: (ii) in the case of organizations, a change in the
name of the contact person; and (iii) a termination of registration. Upon receipt of such
notice, the Director of Finance shall revise the applicable Registry accordingly.
I. Reaistries Available for Public Insnection Each Registry shall be available for public
inspection during normal business hours. The Registry shall include the name, address
and telephone number of each Interested Person and for organizations, the name and
phone number of a designated contact person.
J. Notices to be Sent to Interested Parties. Interested Parties shall be sent the following
notices and any other notices required under the Act with respect to the applicable
Redevelopment Project Area:
(i) pursuant to sub-section § 74-4-5(a) of the Act, notice of the availability of
a proposed redevelopment plan and eligibility report, including how to
obtain this information, such notice shall be sent by mail within a
reasonable period of time after the adoption of the ordinance fixing the
public hearing for the proposed redevelopment plan:
(ii) pursuant to sub-section § 74-4.5(a) of the Act, notice of changes to
proposed redevelopment plans that do not (1) add additional parcels of
property to the proposed redevelopment project area, (2) substantially
affect the general land uses proposed in the redevelopment plan, (3)
substantially change the nature of or extend the life of the redevelopment
project, or (4) increase the number of Iow or very Iow income households
to be displaced from the redevelopment project area, provided that
measured from the time of creation of the redevelopment project area
the total displacement of households will exceed 10; such notice shall be
sent by mail not later than ten (10) days following the Village's adoption
by ordinance of such changes.
(iii) pursuant to sub-section § 74-4-5 ( c ) of the Act, notice of amendments
to previously approved redevelopment plans that do not: (1) add
additional parcels of property to the redevelopment project area, (2)
substantially affect the general land uses in the redevelopment plan, (3)
substantially change the nature of the redevelopment project, (4)
increase the total estimated redevelopment project costs set out in the
redevelopment plan by more than 5% after adjustment for inflation from
the date the plan was adopted, (5) add additional redevelopment project
costs to the itemized list of redevelopment project costs set out in the
redevelopment plan or (6) increase the number of Iow or very Iow income
households to be displaced from the redevelopment project area,
provided that measured from the time of creation of the redevelopment
project area the total displacement of households will exceed 10; such
notice shall be sent by mail not later than 10 days following the Village's
adoption by ordinance of any such amendment.
(iv) pursuant to sub-section § 74.4-5(d)(9) of the Act for redevelopment plans
or projects that would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or
more inhabited residential units or that contain 75 or more inhabited
residential units, notice of the availability of the annual report described
by sub-section § 74.4-5(d), including how to obtain the annual report;
such notice shall be sent by mail within a reasonable period of time after
completion of the certified audit reporL
(v) pursuant to sub-section § 74.4-6(e) of the Act, notice of the preliminary
public meeting required under the Act for a proposed Redevelopment
Project Area that will result in the displacement of 10 or more inhabited
residential units or which will contain 75 or more inhabited residential
units, such notice shall be sent by certified mail not less than 15 days
before the date of such preliminary public meeting.
K. Non Interference These Registration Rules shall not be used to prohibit or
otherwise interfere with the ability of eligible organizations and individuals to
register for receipt of information to which they are entitled under the Act.
I. Amendment of Registration Rules These Registration Rules may be amended
by the Village subject to and consistent with the requirements of the Act.
TIF INTERESTED PARTIES REGISTRATION FORM
Registration for Villaae Residents: If you are a Village of Mount Prospect resident and would
like to register on the Interested Parties Registry for the Village's tax increment financing
(TIF) redevelopment project areas, please complete Part A of this form. Proof of residency
is required. Please attach a photocopy of one of the following (driver's license, lease, utility
bill, financial statement, or such other evidence as may be suitable to establish your current
municipal residency) to this form.
Registration for Oraanizations: if your organization is active in the Village of Mount
Prospect and would like to register on the Interested Parties Registry for the Village's tax
increment financing (TIF) redevelopment project areas, please complete Part B of this
form. Please attach to this form a one-page statement that describes the organization's
current operations in the municipality. (Note: existing organizational documents that
provide this information will also be accepted)
PART A: REGISTRATION FOR MUNICIPAL RESIDENTS (Please Print~
Name
Street Address
Zip Code Home Telephone
I have attached a copy of .as proof that I am a resident of the
Village of Mount Prospect as of the date of this registration form.
PART B: REGISTRATION FOR ORGANIZATIONS (Please Print~
Organization Name
Contact Name
Street Address
City. State Zip Code
Telephone ( ) Fax ( )
Check here __ if a statement describing your organization's current operations in
the Village of Mount Prospect is attached.
Please return this form t o: Village of Mount Prospect
Director of Finance
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Signature/Title Date
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS ~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE l~
DATE: JULY 12, 2000
SUBJECT: TIF TAXES LEVIED IN YEAR 23
PURPOSE:
To present for the Village Board's consideration an ordinance amending the Village's Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1 Redevelopment Plan and Project to direct the County to remit the incremental
property taxes levied in the 23rd year of the TIF to the Village.
BACKGROUND:
The recently passed TIF Reform Act (P.A. 9 t-478) clarified the TIF Statutes, providing that
municipalities with TIF's can receive the incremental property taxes levied in the 23rd and final year of
a TIF and received in the 24th year. For many years there was confusion amongst County Clerks as to
how to handle the 23rd year levy.
DISCUSSION:
The attached ordinance amends our Redevelopment Plan to clarify that the Village directs the County
Clerk to extend the taxes in the final year of our TIF, that being 2008.
Adoption of this ordinance does not commit the Village to spending the incremental taxes from the
2008 levy. It does, however, provide the flexibility to utilize those revenues to cover qualified,
necessary TIF expenditures should that be necessary. If at that time it appears the Village does not
need the TIF revenues from the 2008 levy it can dissolve the TIF before the tax distribution, or declare
a TIF surplus and return the monies to the County for distribution to affected taxing bodies.
If adopted by the Village Board, the ordinance will be filed with the Cook County Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Board adopt the ordinance directing the Cook County Clerk to remit the
incremental taxes from the 2008 levy year to the Village.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND
PROJECT FOR THE MOUNT PROSPECT TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA NUMBER ONE
WHEREAS, on August 20, 1985, the President and Board of Trustees (the "Corporate
Authorities") of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, in accordance with the provisions of the Tax
Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.(the "Act"), adopted (i) Ordinance
Number 3554 (the "Redevelopment Plan Approving Ordinance") approving the Village of Mount
Prospect Redevelopment Plan and Project (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Village of Mount Prospect
Redevelopment Project Area Number One (the "Area"); (ii) Ordinance Number 3555 (the
"Redevelopment Area Designation Ordinance") designating the Area as a redevelopment project area
pursuant to the Act; and (iii) Ordinance Number 3556 adopting tax increment allocation financing for the
Area (the "TIF Adoption Ordinance"; the Redevelopment Plan Approving Ordinance, the Redevelopment
Area Designation Ordinance and the TIF Adoption Ordinance are collectively referred to in this ordinance
as the "TIF Ordinances"); and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan established the estimated dates of completion of the
redevelopment project described in the Redevelopment Plan and of the retirement of obligations issued to
finance redevelopment project costs to be August 20, 2008, which date is not more than twenty-three (23)
years from the date of the adoption of the Redevelopment Area Designation Ordinance, and the Corporate
Authorities made a finding in the Redevelopment Plan Approving Ordinance that such dates were not
more than twenty-three (23) years from the date of the adoption of the Redevelopment Area Designation
Ordinance in accordance with the provisions of Section 11-74.4-3(n)(3) of the Act in effect as of August
20, 1985; and
WHEREAS, Public Act 91-478 (the "Amendatory Act"), which became effective November 1,
1999, amended the Act, among other things, to (i) change the dates set forth in Section 11-74.4-3(n)(3) of
the Act by which redevelopment projects must be completed and obligations issued to finance
redevelopment project costs must be retired to be no later than December 3I of the year in which the
payment to a municipal treasurer as provided in Section 11-74.4-8(b) of the Act is to be made with
respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordinance
approving a redevelopment project area is adopted, and (ii) provide that a municipality may amend an
existing redevelopment plan to conform such redevelopment plan to Section 11-74.4-3(n)(3) of the Act,
as amended by the Amendatory Act, by an ordinance adopted without further hearing or notice and
without complying with the procedures provided in the Act pertaining to an amendment to or the initial
approval of a redevelopment plan and project and designation of a redevelopment project area; and
WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities desire to amend the Redevelopment Plan to conform the
Redevelopment Plan to Section 11-74.4-3(n)(3) of the Act, as amended by the Amendatory Act, in
accordance with the procedures set forth in amended Section 11-74.4-3(n)(3); now, therefore
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COLrNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING PURSUANT TO ITS HOME RULE
POWERS:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. Approval of Amendment to Redevelopment Plan. The Village hereby approves
this Amendment to the Village of Mount Prospect Redevelopment Plan and Project, providing that the
Village may use ad valorem property taxes levied in the year 2008 and collected in the year 2009 to pay
eligible TIF expenses for the Mount Prospect Tax Increment Financing District No. 1, as amended.
SECTION 3. Transmittal to County Clerk. The Corporate Authorities hereby authorize and
direct the Village Clerk to send a copy of this ordinance to the Cook County Clerk to inform the County
Clerk about the additional year that the County Clerk shall collect and disburse tax increment revenues to
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION 4. Finding. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the finding that the estimated
dates of completion of the redevelopment project described in the Redevelopment Plan and of the
retirement of obligations issued to finance redevelopment project costs set forth in the Redevelopment
Plan, as amended by the Amendment to Redevelopment Plan, conform to the provisions of Section I 1-
74.4-3(n)(3) of the Act, as amended by the Amendatory Act.
SECTION 5. Invalidity of Any Section; Severability. If any provision of this ordinance shall
be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforeeabitity of such provision
shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance, and to that effect all provisions of this
ordinance are deemed severable.
SECTION 6. Superseder. All ordinances (including, without limitation, the TIF Ordinances),
resolutions, motions or orders in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such
conflict.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage.
AYES:
NAYES:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
LAW OFFICES
KLEIN, THORPE AND JENKINS, LTD.
Suite 1660
PaMck A. Lucansky 20 North Wacker Drive Rinda Y. Allison
E. Kenneth Ffiker Chicago, Illinois 60606-2903 James V. Ferolo
Gerard E. Dempsey ........ Michael T. Jurt~ik
Terrence M. Bamicle Telephone (312) 984-6400 Thomas M. Melody
Bruce A. Zolna Facsimile 012) 984-6444 Lance C. Malina
James P. Bartley (312) 606-7077 Ju.ie E. Heubergers
Richard T. Wimmer ........ Arthur C. Thorpe
Michael J. Duggan Oflaad Park Office Michael P. O'Brien
Thomas P. Bayer 15010 S, Ravinia Avenue David L Fish
Dennis G. Walsh Suite 17
Scott F. Uhler Orland Park, Illinois 60462
Everette M. Hill, Jr. Telephone (708) 349-3888 Of Counsel
Janet N. Petseh¢ (312) 984-6446 Arthar C. Thorpe
Facsimile (708) 349-1506 Philippe R. Weiss
TO: Michael E. Janonis
Village Manager
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr.
DATE: July 12, 2000
RE: TIF Reform Act Joint Review Board
Pursuant to the TIF Reform Act of 1999, the Village Board is now required to
appoint an elected official to the TiF Joint Review Board. This may be accomplished by a
motion to appoint the Mayor or his or her designee as the representative to the Joint
Review Board.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
iNTEROiq~iCE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JUNE 20, 2000
SUBJECT: COMPREItENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT - 12/31/99
PURPOSE:
To present the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1999.
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the Village retains a CPA finn to audit the Village's CAFR. Friedman, Eisenstein, Raemer
and Schwartz (FERS) performed the audit of the Village's CAFR for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1999.
DISCUSSION:
FERS has given the 1999 CAFR an "unqualified opinion". This means that their examination found
our financial statements to be fairly presented and prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Their opinion can be found on page 1 of the financial section.
A detailed overview of the financial results for the fiscal year is provided in the transmittal letter to the
CAFR, which may be found on pages iv through xviii in the report's introductory section. Following
are a few of the more significant highlights:
General Fund: General Fund revenues of $26,440,459 exceeded projections by $921,316 or 3.61%.
The following table shows the breakdown of the positive variance by major revenue categories.
Revenue Type Budget Actual Variance % Variance
property Taxes $ 6,304,370 $ 6,367,393 $ 63,023 1.00%
Other Taxes 9,832,000 10,353,922 521,922 5.31%
Licenses, Permits 2,813,800 2,876,306 62,506 2.22%
Intergovernmental 4,796,701 4,888,029 91,328 1.90%
Service Charges 555,300 567,030 11,730 2.11%
Fines and Forfeits 498,000 561,647 63,647 4.25%
Investment Earnings 325,000 392,922 67,922 20.90%
Miscellaneous 393,972 i 433,210 39,238 9.96%
Total Revenue $25,519,143 $26,440,459 $921,316 3.61%
Revenue classified as Other Taxes exceeded our projections by $521,922, or 5.31%. Sales tax receipts
of $7,050, 645 came in $216,645 or 3.2% above our projections. The real estate transfer tax generated
$922,591, a positive variance of $247,591, or 36.7%, due to some large commercial property transfers.
Investment earnings in the General Fund exceeded projections by $67,922 due to rising interest rotes
and better cash management techniques.
Actual expenditures totaled $24,783,822, representing a positive variance of $208,768, or 0.84%, over
the revised 1999 Budget. The following table presents a breakdown of actual expenditures as
compared to the final budget for each department.
Variance % Variance
Positive/ Positive
Department Final Budget Actual (Negative) (Negative)
Village Board $ 95,431 $ 93,263 $ 2,168 2.27%
Village Manager 947,121 916,086 31,035 3.28%
Communications 182,540 173,140 9,400 5.15%
Village Clerk 142,157 136,699 5,458 3.84%
Finance 1,230,302 1,217,839 12,463 1.01%
Human Services 603,182 583,458 19,724 3.27%
Community Dew 1,339,096 1,274,982 64,114 4.79%
Police 8,672,919 8,484,699 188,220 2.17%
Fire 6,743,589 6,685,278 58,311 0.86%
Public Works 4,713,791 4,883,633 (169,842) (3.60)%
Miscellaneous 322,462 334,745 (12,283) (3.81)%
Total Expenditures $24,992,590 $24,783,822 $208,768 0.84%
The General Fund is showing an excess of revenues over expenditures of $1,656,637. A total of
$1,926,390 was transferred to the Capital Improvements Fund and the Vehicle Replacement FUnd,
resulting in a net reduction of $269,753 in fund balance. The General Fund is showing a fund balance
at December 31, 1999 of $6,083,090'. This represents 23% of budgeted operating expenditures for
2000.
Special Revenue Funds: In total, the special revenue funds are showing an excess of revenues over
expenditures in the amount of $82,479. Fund balance for the special revenue funds total $2,122,210.
The only fund showing an operating deficit is the Motor Fuel Tax Fund, which included a budgeted
draw-down of fund balance for street reconstruction.
Debt Service Funds: The various debt service funds are showing an operating deficit of$112,063 for
the year. This was intentional, as we are drawing down fund balance on a few bond funds that will
soon be totally retired.
2
he debt service funds are also showing other financing sources of $1,120,000, which consist of bond
proceeds of $120,000 and TIF land sale proceeds of $1,000,000. This resulted in fund balance
increasing $1,007,937 for a total of $3,041,610.
Capital Proieets Fnnds: Expenditures of $10,339,835 exceeded revenues by $6,839,039. However,
we did receive bond proceeds and other financing sources of $8,588,157, therefore fund balance
actually increased by $1,749,118 in 1999. As of December 31, 1999 fund balance totaled $7,768,128.
Water and Sewer Fnnd: This fund is showing net income of $312,320 on revenues of $7,460,154
and expenses of $7,147,834. The net income figure includes depreciation expense of $397,668, and
excludes $111,800 of bond principal payments and $365,112 of capitalized fixed assets. From a
modified cash standpoint, receipts exceeded disbursements by $233,076.
Risk Management Fund: The Risk Management Fund is showing net income of $184,167 on
revenue of $3,308,808 and expenses of $3,124,641. Expenses in total came in under budget.
However, expenses related to liability claims exceeded budget by $429,625. Fortunately, health
insurance expenses came in significantly under budget to offset the negative variance in liability
claims. Total fund equity at December 31, 1999 was $1,843,149.
Pension Trust Funds: The Police Pension Fund is showing an increase of $139,905 in Net Plan
Assets. The Fund had net assets of $28,700,234 as of December 31, 1999. The Fund's actuary
calculated a funding level of 92.13%.
The Firefighters' Pension Fund is showing a decrease in Net Plan Assets of $689,173. The decrease is
due to a drop in the market value of the funds investments as of December 31, 1999~
The Fund's actuary is reporting a funding level of 94.4%.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal
year ended December 3 l, 1999.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
Copy: Finance Commission Members
David Strahl, Assistant Village Manager
Carol Widmer, Deputy Director of Finance
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JUNE 20, 2000
SUBJECT: TIF COMPLIANCE AUDIT - 12/31/99
PURPOSE:
To present the Report on Compliance with Public Act 85-1142 for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1999.
BACKGROUND:
Each year as part of the annual financial audit, the Village engages a CPA firm to undertake a
compliance audit of our tax increment financing activities. Friedman, Eisenstein, Raemer and
Schwartz (FERS) performed the TIF compliance audit for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
DISCUSSION:
As you can see On page 6 of the TIF Compliance Report, the auditors are reporting that the Village
complied with the requirements of the Tax Inclement RedeVelopment Allocation Act (P.A. 85-1142).
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the Report on Compliance with Public Act 85-I 142 for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
Copy: Finance Commission Members
David'Stcahl, Assistant Village Manager
Cato! Widm~r Deputy Director of Finance
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
WITH PUBLIC ACT 85-1142
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
CONTENTS
Page
Independent Auditors' Report 1
Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances 2
Schedule of Ending Fund Balance by Source 3 - 5
Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance 6
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
FRIEDMAN EISENSTEIN
Chicago, Illinois 60611.4240 312.644.6000
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS~ REPORT
April 18, 2000
The Honorable Mayor
Members of the Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
We have audited the general purpose financial statements, and the combining, individual fund and
account group financial statements of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated April 18, 2000. The financial
statements are the responsibility of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois' management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose f'mancial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards
applicable to financial audits contained in "Government Auditing Standards" issued by the Comptroller
General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supPorting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
. statements. An audit als° includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements
and the combining, individual fund and account group financial statements of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, taken as a whole. The accompanying combining schedule of revenues, expenditures
and changes in fund balances and the accompanying schedule of fund balances by source are presented
for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial
statements. The information in these schedules has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in
the audit of the general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all
material respects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole.
-1-
o,8°0
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
FERS :: 401 North n|chigan Avenue
Chicago, I linois 60611,4240 312.(~4.6000 v^x 312.644.4423
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
April 18, 2000
The Honorable Mayor
Members of the Board of Trustees
Village of Mourn Prospect, Illinois
We have audited the general purpose financial statements and the combining, individual fund and
account group financial statements of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated April 18, 2000.
We have also audited the Village's compliance with the provisions of subsection (q) of Section 11-74.4-3
of the Illinois Tax Increment Redevelopment Allocation Act (Illinois Public Act 85-1142). The
management of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois is responsible for the Village's compliance with
those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with those requirements.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards
applicable to financial audits contained in "Government Auditing Standards" issued by the Comptroller
General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the requirements referred to above
occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Village of Mount Prospect,
Illinois' compliance with those requirements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois complied, in all material respects, with the
requirements of subsection (q) of Section 1t-74.4-3 of the Illinois Tax Increment Redevelopment
Allocation Act (Illinois Public Act 85-1142).
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROi~I, iCE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JUNE 20, 2000
SUBJECT: SINGLE AUDIT ACT COMPLIANCE - 12131/99
PURPOSE:
To present the Single Audit Compliance Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
BACKGROUND:
Each year as part of the annual financial audit, the Village engages a CPA firm to undertake a
compliance audit of the Village's federal and state grant receipts pursuant to the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133. This is commonly referred to as the Single Audit
Act. Friedman, Eisenstein, Raemer and Schwartz (FERS) performed the Single Audit for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999.
DISCUSSION:
As you can see on page 3 of the Single Audit Report, the auditors are reporting that the Village
complied with the Single Audit Act for 1999.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the Single Audit Compliance Report for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1999.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
Copy: Finance Commission Members
David Stxahl, Assistant Village Manager
Carol Widmer, Deputy Director of F.!nance
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
SINGLE AUDIT ACT
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL AND COMPLIANCE REPORT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31~ 1999
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Table of Contents
Pa_B~
Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance and on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting Based on an Audit of General Purpose
Financial Statements Performed in Accordance With
Government Auditing Standards t - 2
Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance With Requirements
Applicable to Each Major Program and on Internal Control Over
Compliance in Accordance With OMB Circular A-133 . 3 - 4
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 5
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 6
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 7 - 8
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLI.~NCE AND
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
BASED ON AN AUDIT OF GENERAL PURPOSE YIN.ANCIAL
STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
April 18.20~X
The Honorable Mayor
Members of the Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
We have audited the general purpose financial statements and the combining, indMdual fund and account
group financial statements of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated April 18.2~X)O. We conducted our audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits
contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
Compliance
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois' general
purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we pertbrmed tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct
and material effect on the determination of financial statement mounts. However, providing an opinion
on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and. accordingly, we do not express
such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be
reported under Government Auditing Standards.
FERS
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois' internal
control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing
our opinion on the f'mancial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial
reporting. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose
all matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material
weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components
does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in
relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the
internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, and federal awarding agencies
and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE
WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR
PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133
April 18, 2000
The Honorable Mayor
Members of the Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Compliance
We have audited the compliance of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois with the types of compliance
requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance
Supplement that are applicable to its major federal program for the year ended December 31, 1999. The
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois' major federal program is identified in the summary of auditors' results
section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the requirements
of laws, regulations, contracts and grants applicable to its major federal program is the responsibility of the
VilIage of Mount Prospect, Illinois' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
VilIage of Mount Prospect, Illinois' compliance based on our audit.
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with generalIy accepted auditing standards; the
standards applicable to financial audits conta'med in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of
compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal
program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois' compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our audit does not provide a legal determination on the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois'
compliance with those requirements.
In our opinion, the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois complied, in all material respects, with the
requirements referred to above that are applicable to its major federal program for the year ended
December 31, 1999.
-3-
FERS
Internal Control Over Compliance
The management of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois is responSible for establishing and maintaining
effective internal control over compliance with requirements of laws, regulationS, contracts and grants
applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois' internal controI over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material
effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in
accordance with OMB Circular A-133.
Our consideration of the internal control over compliance would not necessarily disclose all matters in the
internal control that might be material weaknesses. A material weakness is a condition in which the design
or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the
risk that noncompliance with applicable requirements of laws, regulations, contracts and grants that would
be material in relation to a major federal program being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We noted no
matters involving the internal control over compliance and its operation that we consider to be material
weaknesses.
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
We have audited the general purpose financial statements and the combining, individual fund and account
group fmancial ~statements of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated April 18, 2000. Our audit was performed
for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The
accompanying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis
as required by OMB Circular A-133 and is not a required part of the general purpose financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the general
purpose financial statements taken as a whole.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, and federal awarding agencies
and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties.
-4-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
1. SCOPE OF REVIEW
The Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois is a governmental entity established under Illinois State
Statutes. The Village has had a single audit performed for its fiscal year ended December 31,
1999, pursuant to the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards includes the federal grant activity
of the Village of Mourn Prospect, Illinois and is presented on the accrual basis of accounting.
Expenditures are recognized at the time liabilities are incurred. The information in this schedule is
presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Therefore, some amounts presented in this Schedule
may differ from amounts presented in, or used in the preparation of, the general purpose financial
statements.
3. MAJOR PROGRAMS
The Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois used a dollar threshold of $300,000 to distinguish between
TYpe A and Type B programs for the year ended December 31, 1999.
4. ILLINOIS EPA LOANS
The Village had $7,444,490 of loan balances outstanding at December 31, 1999 with the Illinois
· . Environmental Protection Agency (CFDA No. 66.419).
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended December 31, 1999
Section I- Summary of Auditors' Results
~inancial Statements
The auditors' report dated April 18, 2000 on the general purpose financial statements and the combining,
individual fund and account group financial statements for the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois as of and
for the year ended December 31, 1999, contained an unqualified opinion. Our'procedures relating to the
internal control over financial reporting identified no instances of material weaknesses, no instances of
reportable conditions and no instances of noncompliance material to the financial statements.
Federal Awards
Our procedures relating to the internal control over the major program identified no instances of material
weaknesses and no instances of reportable conditions. The auditors' report dated April 18, 2000 on
compliance with requirements applicable to each major program for the year ended December 31, 1999,
contained an unqualified opinion. There were no audit findings that are required to be disclosed in
accordance with Circular A-133, Section .510(a).
Major Program
.CFDA Number Name of Federal Program
66.419 Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund Loan
The dollars threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs was $300,000.
The Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois was not determined to be a Iow risk auditee.
Section II - Financial Statement Findings
There were no reportable conditions, material weaknesses or instances of noncompliance related to the
general purpose financial statements of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1999 that are required to be reported in accordance with paragraphs 5.18 through 5.20 of
Government Auditing Standards.
-7-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended December 31, 1999
Section HI - Federal Award Findlnoo$ and Questioned Costs
There were no audit findings or questioned costs required to be reported by Section 510(a) of Circular A-
133, for the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois for the year ended December 31, 1999.
-8-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JUNE 20, 2000
SUBJECT: AUDITOR'S MANAGEMENT LETTER- 12/31/99
PURPOSE:
To present the Auditor's Management Letter for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
BACKGROUND:
Auditing Standards require auditors to present a management letter to the governing boards of entities
they have audited. The purpose of the letter is to inform the board of any problems they encountered
during the audit, and to report any deficiencies in internal controls uncovered during the course of the
audit.
DISCUSSION:
Attached is the Management Letter prepared by Friedman, Eisenstein, Raemer and Schwartz (FERS)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999. The auditors are reporting that they encountered no
problems during their audit process. Furthermore, they indicate that there were no material
weaknesses in internal controls discovered during the audit.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the auditor's Management Letter for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
Copy: Finance Commission Members
David Strahl, Asiistant Village Manager
· · · .Carol Widmer, Deputy Director of. Finance : . .
April 18, 2000
The Honorable Mayor
Members of the Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
for the year ended December 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated April 18, 2000.
Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our
audit.
Our Responsibility under Generally Accepted Auditing Standardg and Government Auditing
Standards
As stated in our engagement letter dated July 9, 1999, our responsibility, as described by
professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute,
assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement.
Because of the concept of reasonable assurance and because we did not perform a detailed
examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, fraud, or other illegal acts may
exist and not be detected by us.
As part of out' audit, we considered the internal control of the Village of .Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to
provide any assurance concerning such internal control.
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, we performed tests of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois' compliance with certain
provisions of laws, regulation, contracts, and grants. However, the objective of our tests was not to
provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions.
Significant Accounting Polices
Management has the responsibility for selection and uses of appropriate accounting policies. In
accordance with the terms of our engagement letter, we advise management about the
appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. The significant accounting POlicies used
by the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois are described in Note .1 to the general purpose financial
statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was
.not changed during 1999. We noted no transactions entered into by the Village Of Mount Prospect,
Illinois during the year that were both significant and unusual, and of which, under professional
standards, We are required to infOrm you, 'or transactions for which fhere is a lack of authoritative
guidance or consensus. . . '
FERS
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
April 18, 2000
Page 2
Accounting Estimates
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the general purpose financial statements prepared by
management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current
events and assumptions about future events. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by
management to develop the accounting estimates and determined that such estimates are reasonable
in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
Significant Audit Adjustments
For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a significant audit adjustment as a proposed
correction of the general purpose financial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been
detected except through our auditing procedures. We proposed no audit adjustments that could, in
our judgmem, either individually or in the aggregate, have a significant effect on the Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois' financial reporting process.
Disagreements with Management
For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a
matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting, or
auditing matter that could be significant to the general purpose financial statements or the auditors'
report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit.
Consultations with Other Independent Accountants
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and
accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation
involves application of an accounting principle to the governmental unit's general purpose financial
statements or a determination of the type of auditors' opinion that may be expressed on those
statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to
determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To .our knowledge, there were no such
consultations with other accountants.
FERS
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
April 18, 2000
Page 3
Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Independent Auditors
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and
auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the Village of Mount Prospect,
Illinois' auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional
relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention.
Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit
We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit.
This information is intended solely for the use of the Members of the Board of Trustees and
management of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois and is not intended to be and should not be
used by anyone other than those specified parties.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JUNE 28, 2000
SUBJECT: 2001-2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
PURPOSE:
To recommend adoption of the 2001-2005 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP).:
BACKGROUND:
The Village of Mount Prospect prepares a five-year Capital Improvements Plan prior to the start of the
annual budget process. The Plan provides a long-term view of needed capital projects and equipment.
DISCUSSION:
A proposed Capital Improvements Plan for the years 2001 through 2005 was prepared by staff and
submitted to the Finance Commission and Committee of the Whole in late May. The Finance
Commission reviewed the document on June 22n~ and the Committee of the Whole reviewed the
document on June 27th.
The Finance Commission is recommending the planned improvements to Fire Station #12 (Page D-6),
at a cost of $150,000, be moved from 2002 to 2001. The Commission is also recommending the first
phase of the combined sewer system study ($750,000, Page F-20) be funded from Water Fund cash
reserves. No change to the CIP would be necessary for this latter item, however, since the CIP is
already showing the expense as coming from the Water and Sewer Fund.
The five-year CIP totals $52,177,628, with the year 2001 requests totaling $17,138,377. Attached
hereto are updated.summary pages to the CIP. Upon adoption by the Village Board, a final document
will be produced and distributed.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board adopt the 2000-2004 Capital Improvements Plan.
DOUGL.~S R: ELLSWORTH, CPA DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
l:\CIP\01-05\eorrespOndencekBD mtg memo.doe
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Recapitulation by Department
Depar~ent 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Administxation 83,000 151,000 174,100 0 56,000 464,100
Cornmunit~ Development 6,855,000 6,060,000 775,000 305,000 170,000 14,165,000
Fire 37,000 246,500 2,360,000 14,500 15,000 2,673,000
Police 17,849 0 0 0 0 17,849
Public Works 10,110,528 6,272,217 5,990,055 6,515,528 5,899,351 34,787,679
· Interdepartmental 35,000 35,000 0 0 0 70,000
Total 17,138,377 12,764,717 9,299,155 6,835,028 6,140,351 52,177,628
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Recapitulation by Project Type Group
Project Type Group 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Water and Sanitary Sewer Projects 1,075,000 1,010,000 945,000 840,000 870,000 4,740,000
Flood Control and Related Projects 2,035,000 1,015,000 1,015,000 875,000 925,000 5,865,000
Street and Related Projects 7,186,960 4,418,720 4,479,220 4,603,000 3,842,000 24,529,900
Public Buildings 6,289,000 5,765,000 2,431,000 234,000 140,000 14,859,000
Equipment 202,849 331,600 170,100 14,500 71,000 790,049
Miscellaneous 349,568 224,397 258,835 268,528 292,351 1,393,679
Total 17,138,377 12,764,717 9,299,155 6,835,028 6,140,351 52,177,628
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Project Type Group: Water and Sanitary Sewer Projects (Codes 10 and 20)
Page Prnject
project Name No. Typ~ 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Sewer Main Rehabilitation (E) F-5 20 275,000 285,000 295,000 315,000 330,000 1,500,000
Water Main Replacement (E) F-6 10 210,000 275,000 300,000 325,000 475,000 1,585,000
Water Tank Rehabilitation (E) F-7 10 350,000 0 300,000 0 0 650,000
Hi-Service Pumping Systero (E) F-8 10 160,000 450,000 50,000 50,000 65,000 775,000
Addison Cou~ Improvements (lq) F-19 10/40/50 80,000 0 0 0 0 80,000
· Stand-By Purop Power Supply (E) F-23 10 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000
Total 1,075,000 1,010,000 945,000 . 840,000 870,000 4,740,000
* ~ Federal Mandate (E) = Established Project {Nv) = New Project
Project l'ype Codes:
10 ~ Wat=i' System
20 = Sanita~ Sewer
A-3
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Project Type Group: Flood Control and Related Projects (Codes 30 and 40)
Page Project
Project Name No. Type 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Flood Control Program (E) F-4 30 950,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 1.200,000
Addison Court Improvements (N) F-19 10/40/50 120,000 0 0 0 0 120,000
Combined Sewer Improvements (N) F-20 40 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,750,000
Detention Pond Improvements CN) F-21 40 140,000 140,000 140,000 0 0 420,000
Storm Swr Inventory & Mapping(N) F-22 40 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000
Total 2,035,0~0 1,015,000 1,015,000 875,000 925,000 5,865,000
* = Federal Mandate (E) -- Established Project ~ = N~v project
Project ~e Codes:
30 = Flood Control Projects
40 = Storm Sewer
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROorECT REQUESTS
Project Type Group: Street and Related Projects (Codes 50 and 60)
Page Project
project Name No. Type 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Streetscape program (E) C-2 50 425,000 400,000 615,000 135,000 0 1,575,000
Corridor lmpwveraents (E) C-4 50 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
Street Reconstruction (E) F-2 50 3,059,460 0 0 0 0 3,059.460
Street Resuffacing (E) F-3 60 1,264,000 3,057,000 3,165,000 3,278,000 3,395,000 14.159,0~0
Sidewalk Cost Share Program (E) F-9 60 77,500 $0,000 82,500 85,000 87,500 412,500
· Sidewalk Improvement Program (E) F-10 60 57,500 60,000 62,500 65,000 67,500 312,500
Sidewalks-ADA Compliance (E)* F-I 1 60 57,500 60,000 62,500 65,000 67,000 312,000
New Sidewalks (N) F-12 60 144,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 344,000
Streetlight Improvements 1 (E) F-15 60 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 100.000
Streetlight Improvements 2 (E) F-16 60 1,877,000 25,000 25.000 0 0 1,927,000
Bridge Rehabilitation (E) F-IS 50 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000
Addison Court Imprbvements (lq) F-19 10/40/50 0 220,000 0 0 0 220,000
Wolf Road Improve. (Iq) F-24 50 0 241,720 241,720 0 0 483,440
Busse Road Improvements 0q) F-26 60 0 0 0 750,000 0 750,000
Total 7,186,960 4,418,720 4,479,220 4,603,000 3,842,000 24,529,900
* -- Federal Mandate (E) = Established project (bO = New Projeet
Project Type Code~:
50 = Street Construction and Rec~nstnaction
60.= .Resu~lt~cin~Curb6 and Guttsrs~id~valks
A-5
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Project Type Group: Public Buildings (Code 70)
Page Project
Project Name No. Type 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Village Hall/Senior Center Facility (lq) C-6 70 3,600,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 6,600,000
Municipal Parking Facility (Iq) C-7 70 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0 5,000,000
Fire Station 12 Improve. (iq) D-6 70 0 150,000 0 0 0 150,000
New Fire Station 14 (Iq) D-7 70 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000
Expansion of PW Bldg. (N) D-8 70 0 0 846,000 0 0 846,000
· Other Public Buildings (E) F-13 70 49,000 65,000 30,000 150,000 80,000 374,000
Parking Lot Improvements (N) F-17 70 140,000 50,000 55,000 84,000 60,000 389,000
Total 6,289,000 5,765,000 2,431,000 234,000 140,000 14,859,000
* = Federal Mandate (E) = ~tablished Project (lq) = New Project
Project Type Codes:
70 = Construction of and Improvements to Public. Buildings
3i.-6
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Project Type Group: Equipment (Codes 80 and 90)
Page Project
Project Name No. Type 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Television Studio Upgrade (E) B-2 90 27,000 0 0 0 0 27,000
Desktop Operating System (Iq) B-3 90 56,000 0 0 0 56,000 112,000
Remote Production Vehicle (lq) B-4 80 0 68,000 100,000 0 0 168,000
Remote Control Camera System (Iq) B-6 90 0 83,000 56,100 0 0 139,100
Voice Permit System 6'4) C-5 90 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000
Apparatus Data Link (E) D-2 90 24,000 16,000 0 0 0 40,000
Turnotu Gear (E) D-3 90 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 70,000
Warning Siren Telemetry (Iq') D4 90 0 29,000 0 0 0 29,000
Cardiac Monitors (Iq) D-5 90 38,000 38,000
Mobile Data Terminals (E) E-2 90 17,849 0 0 0 0 17,849
Engine Analyzer (Iq) F-25 80 0 49,100 0 0 0 49,100
Hand-Held Computers (Iq) G-2 90 35,000 35,000 0 0 0 70,000
Total 202,849 331,600 ~170'100 14,500 71,000 790,049
* = Federal Mandate (E) -- Established Project (lq) -- New Project
PrOject ~ype Codex:
8~ = Vehiel~ and Automotive Equipment
90 = Non-Autumofive Equipment
3,-7
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Project Type Group: Miscellaneous (Code 00)
Page Project
Project Name No. Type 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Network Rewiring (Iq) B-5 00 0 0 18,000 0 0 18,000
Downtown Redevelepment (E) C-3 00 200,000 60,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 460,000
Tree Planting Program (E) F-14 00 149,568 164,397 180,835 198,528 222,351 915,679
Total 349,568 224,397 258,835 268,528 292,351 1,393,679
* = Federal Mandate (E) = Established Project ~ = New Project
Project Type Codes:
00 = Miscellaneous
A-8
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Projects By Sources of Funds
Page Project
Project Name No. T~pe 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
General Fund:
Tumom Gear (E) D-3 90 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 70,000
Sidewalk Cost Share Program (E) F-9 60 50,250 52,250 54,250 56,250 58,250 271,250
Sidewalk Improvement Program (E) F-10 60 57,500 60,000 62,500 65,000 67,500 312,500
New Sidewalks (iq) F-12 60 68,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 268,000
· Tree Planting Program (E) F-14 00 88,679 99,907 112,346 125,744 140,833 567,509
Storm Sewer inventory/Mapping (lq) F-22 40 75,000 75,0t30 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000
Subtotal - General Fund 352,429 350,657 368,096 386,494 406,583 1,864,259
Capital Improvement Fund:
Digital Upgrade of Tel. System (E) B-2 90 27,000 0 0 0 0 27,000
Desktop Operating System (Iq) B-3 90 56,000 0 0 0 56,000 112,000
Remote Production Vehicle (N) B-4 80 0 68,000 100,000 0 0 168,000
Network Rewiring (bl) B-5 00 0 0 18,000 0 0 18,000
Remote Control Camera (N) B-6 90 0 83,000 56,100 0 0 139,100
Corridor Improvements (E) C-4 50 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
Voice Permit System (Iq) C-5 90 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000
Station 12 Improvements (Iq) D-6 70 0 150,000 0 0 0 150,000
Apparatus Data Link (E) D-2 90 24,000 16,000 0 0 0 40,000
Warning System Telemetry Sys. (Iq) D-4 90 0 29,000 0 0 0 29,000
Cardlae Monitors (Iq) D-5 90 0 38,000 0 0 0 38,000
Mobile Data Terminals (E) E-2 90 1,623 0 0 0 0 1,623
Other Public Buildings (E) F- 13 70 49,000 65,000 30,000 150,000 g0,000 374,000
Str~etlight Improvements 2 (E) F- 16 60 390,903 25,000 25,000 0 0 440,903
Parking Lot Improvemen~ (I~ F- 17 70 40,000 0 0 45,000 60,000 145,000
Bridge Rehab (E) F- 18 50 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 375,000
Detention Fond Improvements (lq) F-21 40 140,000 140,000 140,000 0 0 420,0~
Wolf Road Improvements (lq) F-24 50 0 241,720 241,720 0 0 483,440
Buase Road Improvements (Iq) F-26 60 0 0 0 600,000 0 600,000
Hand,Held Computers (lq) G-2 90 35,000 35,000 0 0 0 70,000.
Submta! - Capital Improvement Fund 968,526 1 065 720 785,820 970,000 371,000 4,161 066
Motor Fuel lex Fund:
Stroet Resuffacing (E) F-3 60 1,264,000 .1,190,000 11192,000 1,195,000 1,198,000 6,039000
Subtotal - Moro* Fuel Tax Fund 1,264,000 1,190,000 1,192,000 1,195,000 IA98,000 6,039,000_
A-9
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Projects By Sources of Funds
Page Project
Project Name No. T~e 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Communi~ D~velopment Block
Grant (CDBG) Fund:
Sidewalks-ADA Compliance (E)* F- 11 60 57,500 60,000 62,500 65,000 67,000 312,000
Streeflight Improvements 1 (E) F-15 60 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 100,000
Subtotal - CDBG Fund 107,500 110,000 62,500 65,000 67,000 412,000
Downtown Redevelopment
Construction Fund:
Streetscape Program (E) C-2 50 425,000 400,000 615,000 135,000 0 1,575,000
Downtown Redevelop. Programs (E) C-3 00 200,000 60,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 460.000
Subtotal - Downtown Redevelopment
Construction Fund 625,000 460,000 675,000 205,000 70,000 2,035,000
Street Improvement
Construction Fund:
Street Reconstraetion (E) F-2 50 3,059,460 0 0 0 0 3,059,460
Street Resuffaeing (E) F-3 60 0 1,867,000 1,973,000 2,083,000 2,197,000 8,120,000
Subtotal - Street Improvement
Construction Ftmd 3,059,460 1,867,000 1,973,000 2,083.000. 2,197,000 11,179,460
Flood Control
Construction Fund:
Flood Control Program (E) F4 30 950,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 1,200,000
Addison Court Improvements (N) F-19 10140/50 120,000 0 0 0 0 120,000
Subtotal - Flood Control
Construction Fund 1,070,000 50.000 50.000 50,000 100,000 1.320.000
Vehicle Maintenance Fund:
Engine Analyzer (Iq) F-25 80 0 49.100 0 0 0 49,100
Subtotal - Vehicle Maintenance Fund 0 49,100 0 0 0 49.100
A-10
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Projects By Sources of Funds
Page Project
Project Narae No. Type 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total
Water & Sewer Fund:
Sewer Main Rehabilitation (E) F-5 20 275,000 285,000 295,000 315,000 330,000 1,500,000
Water Main Replacement (E) F-6 10 210,000 275,000 300,000 325,000 475,000 1,585,000
Water Tank Rehabilitation (E) F.7 t0 350,000 0 300,000 0 0 650,000
Hi-Service Pumping System (E) F-8 10 160,000 450,000 50,000 50,000 65,000 775,000
- Addison Court Improvements (Iq) F-19 10/40/50 80,000 0 0 0 0 80,000
Combined Sewer Improvements (N) F.20 40 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,750,000
Stand-By Pump Rehabilitation (E) F-23 l0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000
Subtotal - Water & Sewer Fund 1.825,0~) ],760,000 1,695,000 1,590,000 1,620,000 8390,000
Parking Fund:
Parking Lot Improvements (lq) F-17 70 100,000 50,000 55,000 39,000 0 244,000
Subtotal - Parking Fund 100,000 50,000 55,000 39,000 0 244,000
Bond Proceeds:
Village Hall/Senior Center Facility (Iq) C-6 70 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 6,000,0~0
Municipal Parking Facility (Iq) C-7 70 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 0 0 5,000,000
New Fire Station 14 (N) D-7 70 0 0 1,500,000 0 0 1,500,000
Public Works Bldg Expansion (Iq) D-8 70 0 0 846,000 0 0 846,000
Addison Court Improvements (Iq} F-19 10/40/50 0 220,000 220,.000.
Subtotal - Bond proceeds 5,500,000 5,720,000 2,346,000 0 0 13,566,000
Donations/Contribution~ from
Restdsnts/Developers:
Sidewalk Cost Share program (E) F-9 60 27,250 27,750 28,250 28,750 29,250 141,250
Tree Planting Program (E) F-14 00 60,889 64,490 68,489 72,784 81,518 348,170
Str~tlight Improvements 2 (E) F-16 60 240,697 0 0 0 0 240,697..
Subtotal - Contributions 328,836 92,240 96,739 101,534 110.768 730.117.
Miscellaneous State & Federal Grants:
New Sidewalks (lq) F-12 60 76,000 0 0 O 0 76,000
Stxe~etlight Improvements 2 (E) F-t6 60 1,245,400 0 0 0 0 1,2~.5,400
Bus~ Road Improvem~n~ (IN') F-26 60 0 0 0 150,000 0' 150,000~
Subtotal.- Mis~. Federal Grants 1,321,400 0 0 . 150~000' 0 ~:,47~,400
3.-11
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2001 - 2005 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Projects By Sources of Funds
Page Project
Project Name No. Type 2001 2002 2003 2004 . 2005 Total
Local Law Enforcement Grant
Mobile Data Terminals (E) E-2 90 16,226 0 0 0 0 16,226
Subtotal - Local Law Enl. Grants 16,226 0 0 0 0 16,226
Land Sale Proceeds
Village Hall/Senior Center Facility (Iq) C-6 70 600,000 0 0 0 0 600,000
Subtotal - Undetermined 600,000 0 0 0 0 600,000
Total- All Sources 17,138,377 12,764,717 9,299,155 6,835,028 6,140,351 52,177,628
New Projects (Iq) 7,670,000 7,478,820 3,831,820 1,709,000 991,000 21,680,640
Established Projects (E) 9,468,377 5,285,897 5,467,335 5,126,028 5,149,351 30,496;988
Total - All Projects 17,138,377 12,764,717 9,299,155 6,835,028 6,140,351 52,177,628
* -- Federal Mandate (E) = Established Project (lq) -- New Project
Project 2~pe Code~ :
10 = Water System 60 = Resurfacing/Curbs and Gutters/Sidewalks
20 = Sanitary Sewer 70 = Construction of and Improvements to Public Buildings
30 = Flood Control Projects 80 = Vehicles and Automotive Equipment
40 = Storm Sewer 90 -- Non-Automotive Equipment
50 -- Sireet Construction and Reconstruction 00 = Miscellaneous
A-12
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS ~ J jSlO~)
FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JULY 13, 2000
SUB J: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS / STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
DESIGN ENGINEERING FOR CRUMLEY/MELAS/WEDGEWOOD PROJECT.
BACKGROUND ·
In the current budget, staff has requested funding to implement stormwater improvements at the
Crumley Detention Basin, the Melas Park Detention Basin, and in the Wedgewood residential
subdivision. Alt of these proposed projects can be characterized as improvements to facilities
that convey storm water flows. There are no sanitary sewer improvements included in these
projects. All of these projects were identified in the Village's 1990 Stormwater Management
Study.
Crumley Basin is a stormwater detention facility owned and operated by the Village of Mount
Prospect. It is located approximately 700 feet north of Lincoln Street and approximately one half
mile south of Central Road. It is situated between the Busse Road right-of-way and Weller
Creek. The attached orthophotograph depicts this facility.
The basin has a capacity of approximately 36 acre-feet. It accepts inflow waters from a 72"
diameter RCP storm sewer that drains most of the Hatien Heights residential subdivision in
Mount Prospect and portions of eastern Arlington'Heights. The facility includes a concrete inflow
headwall with spillway, two (2) high.level overflows, an underdrain system, and two (2) Iow-flow
outflows. The entire basin drains by gravity into Weller Creek.
The Melas Park Basin is a stormwater detention facility owned by the Metropolitan Water
Reclamation Distdct of Greater Chicago and jointly operated by the Village of Mount Prospect
and the Village of Arlington Heights. it is situated in the northeast corner of Melas Park. The
attached orthophotograph also depicts this facility.
The Village of Mount Prospect is only responsible for the.maintenance and operation of the inflow
and outflow .structures. The Village of Arlington Heights is responsible for the operation and
maintenance of the pumping station. The facility has a capacity of approximately 200 acre-feet.
The basin is fed by an 84" RCP storm sewer that enters the facility via a concrete headwall and
spillway in the northwest corner; The basin also features a Iow-flow bypass, an underdrain
system, and a drainage structure that feeds the pumping station suction piping: The entire basin
drains via the pumping station~
The WedEewood Subdivision is located between Elmhurst Road (Illinois Route 83) to the east,
Euclid Avenue to the nor[h, and Rand Road to the south and west. The area is. characterized by
rural roadway cross~sections with alternating open ditch, driveWay culverts, and small Sections of
closed conduits. The general drainage pattern for the site is to the south andeast, with roadway
Page 2 of 2
July 13, 2000
RFP / Stormwater Improvements for Crumley/Melas/Wedgewood Project
profiles interrupting the area's drainage. The aroa is predominantly developed with under one-
half acre single-family housing. The attached orthophotograph depicts the area.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Detention Basins
Both the Crumley Basin and Melas Park Basin have experienced significant soil erosion near the
inflow structures. For the most part, the erosion is confined to the basin floor adjacent to the
concrete spillway. To a lesser extent, soil erosion is also evident near some of the outflow and
underdrain structures.
WedRewood Subdivision
Flooding incidences reported to the Village have increased in recent years. Flooding occurs at
Iow areas and at roadway intersections where the water must pond before draining over the
roads to the final outlet at Elmhurst Road. A number of local conditions contribute to the flooding
problems. These conditions include roadway intersections with no cross culvert drainage, filled
drainage ditches, drainage ditches that have been replaced with minimal capacity culverts, and
roar/side yard regrading and filling.
Flooding problems are most significant at the following five (5) locations:
1. At the intersection of Stratford Place and Wedgewood Lane.
2. Behind the homes along Meadow Lane.
3. The pavement and front yards along Meadow Lane north of Wedgewood Lane.
4. Behind the homes north of Wedgewood Lane between Rand Road and Meadow Lane.
Ponding of approximately 2 feet occurs prior to the stormwater merging with the ponding
along Meadow Lane.
5. Behind the homes on the nodh side of Stratford Place.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
A technical request for proposals for design engineering services was prepared and distributed to
six (6) professional civil/environmental engineering firms. Firms were selected based on past
performance on similar Village projects and/or their renown for successful stormwater
improvement projects. Proposals were received until July 11,2000.
RFP RESULTS
Three (3) proposals were received. The results are listed below. Staff has evaluated the
proposals and deemed all responsive. It appears Peter F. Olesen and Associates, Inc. of Mount
Prospect has submitted the lowest cost proposal.
Firm ]1 Hours I[ cost
Peter F. Olesen and Associates, Inc. ~--~
Earth Tech, Inc.
Stanley Consultants, Inc.
age 3 of 3
July 13, 2000
RFP / Stormwater Improvements for Crumley/Melas/Wedgewood Project
DISCUSSION
Peter F. Olesen and Associates, Inc. has not been involved in any Village infrastructure
improvement projects in the past. However, they have consulted on traffic engineering issues
and provided design services for streetscape improvements along Prospect Avenue. in addition,
they have successfully completed stormwater improvement projects for other area municipalities
including Deerfield, Des Plaines, Palatine, Prospect Heights, Wilmette, and inverness. They
have also provided a wide range of engineering services to the Illinois Department of
Transportation. It is the opinion of staff that Peter F. Olesen and Associates, Inc. is well qualified
to design the Crumley/MelasNVedgewood Stormwater improvements Project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the opinion of staff that a contract to provide design engineering services for the
Crumley/MelasNVedgewood Stormwater improvements Project be awarded to Peter F. Olesen
and Associates, Inc. of Mount Prospect, Illinois for an amount not to exceed $38,300. Funding
for this proposed expenditure is available in account number 5907704-690110 ($66,000) and
account number 5907704-690111 ($210,000), Both of these accounts can be found on page 287
of the current budget.
Sean P. Dorsey
I concur.
Director of Public Works
SPD/sDd
End, [2)
Cc; Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler
Streets/Buildi~,~s Superintendent Paut Bums
File
C:\RFPS\WEDGEWOOD~ENGINEERING DESIGN AWARD RECOMMENDATION.DOC
WEDGEWOOD AREA
350 0 350 Feet
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ~ cn~ t~
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS ') J I~ 1~:30
FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS [,,~~
DATE: JULY 13, 2000
SUB J: WELLER CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION REACH A2
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL
BACKGROUND
As you are aware, staff is working on the implementation of the subject project. A
design contract has been awarded to Earth Tech, Inc. of Oak Brook, Illinois to prepare
plans and other documents necessary to start construction. We anticipate that bids will
be let in early August followed by a Village Board award in mid-September.
Construction should start by mid-October and reach final completion by the end of 2001.
In short, the project involves the installation of sheet pile retaining wall along the south
bank of the creek between Route 83 and the terminus of the existing sheet pile wall near
Main Street. The north bank in this section of the creek will be stabilized by installing a-
jacks along the toe of the slope, regrading the banks, and installing a permanent erosion
control blanket seeded with flood tolerant grasses. Approximately one-third of the north
bank in this reach will also have a sheet pile retaining wall. Between Emerson Street
and School Street, the proposed plan calls for a-jacks, regraded slopes, and permanent
erosion control blankets covered with flood tolerant grass.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Typically, when large infrastructure improvement projects are awarded, the Village joins
forces with at least two (2) external parties. One party is a construction inspector. The
other is the contractor.
The inspector is usually an employee of a professional engineering firm hired to provide
day-to-day, on-site, inspection and supervision of the contractor's performance. The
purpose of this inspector is to make sure that the project is built according to plans and
applicable codes. It is also the inspector's job to measure and monitor the quantities of
bid items the contractor uses. Inspectors are usually paid at a fiat rate based on hours
worked.
The contractor is the company hired to provide the means, methods, and materials
necessary to construct the project. Usually, the contractor performs most of the work
utilizing his or her own personnel and equipment. Most contractors also use sub-
contractors to perform specialty tasks. Contractors utilize sub-contractors because they
have skills and/or equipment that allow them to perform certain tasks more efficiently
than the contractor could utilizing in-house resources. Contractors win jobs by arranging
Page 2 of 2
Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project Reach A2 Construction Inspection & Construction Management proposal
July 13, 2000
the lowest-cost package of equipment, material, personnel, and subcontractors for a
particular project. For their trouble, they usually add 13%-15% markup on these costs to
cover their overhead and provide a profit.
This traditional triumvirate (Village, inspector, and contractor) has worked well on most
of our projects. However, staff has sedous reservations about the efficacy of this
approach for stabilizing the banks in Reach A2 of Weller Creek.
The cause of our concern is tl~e unusual distribution of work tasks necessary to
construct the project. Usually, the contractor with the most work assumes the role of
prime or general contractor. The prime contractor, in turn, is responsible for hiring
subcontractors and scheduling their work. For example, in Reach Al, the stretch of
creek between Emeresc~n Street and Main Street, the largest chunk of work involved
replacement of the Emerson Street and Main Street bridges. The contractor, Martam
Construction of Elgin, Illinois, specialized in concrete construction and usually worked as
a general contractor. There was enough concrete work to keep Martam's construction
superintendent on the job throughout the project. As a result, the job progressed
smoothly and the subcontractors were managed well.
In Reach A2, the largest cost in the job is the sheet pile wall installation. Sheet pile
drivers typically do not have extensive experience serving as general contractors or
contract administrators. It is feasible that one of the other contractors working on the
job, such as the excavator or the landscaper, could serve as the general contractor.
However, such service would probably demand a premium since the other contractors
do not have as much work as the sheet pile driver. In either event, staff is concerned
that the traditional design/bid/build process will render ineffective and/or
inefficient construction management in Reach A2.
PROPOSAL
To avoid this dilemma, staff has asked Earth Tech to submit a proposal to provide both
construction inspection and construction management services for the Reach A2 project.
Attached, for your review, is a copy of the scope of services they submitted.
Earth Tech proposes to provide construction inspection services for a fiat fee of
$160,000. They will provide construction management services for a fixed rate fee of
7% of final construction costs.
DISCUSSION
In short, staff has asked Earth Tech to serve as the general contractor on this project.
However, we have structured their role to eliminate much of the risk that the general
contractor normally assumes. Hopefully, this restructuring will also result in a cost
savings for the Village.
The construction management approach will work something like this:
· Instead of one (1) bid, Earth Tech will prepare plans and specifications to let four
(4) bids. There will be one (1)bid each for tree removals, channel work, sheet
pile driving, and landscaping. The Village Board will award contracts to each
successful bidder.
Page 3 of 3
Weller Creek Strearnbank Stabilization Project Reach A2 Construction Inspection & Construction Management Proposal
July 13, 2000
· The Village Board will also authorize the Village Manager to disburse funds from
a contingency account. This account will be funded at approximately 10% of the
total bid awards and will be used to pay for work not included in the bid
specifications. An example of this type of work would be remediating some field
condition undiscovered until after construction starts. A general contractor would
normally provide this type of up-front funding to solve a problem and keep the
project moving. He or she would then seek reimbursement from the Village at a
later date in the form of a change order. All disbursements from this contingency
fund will be authorized by the Village Manager and reported to the Village Board.
· Earth Tech will provide an inspector to guarantee the quality of the contractors'
work and a project manager to schedule and direct the contractors.
Utilizing this approach, the potential exists to realize cost savings by avoiding the
general contractor's markup. In many respects, the cost of the subcontractors and the
cost for construction inspection are sunk costs. That is, these costs will be substantially
the same regardless which approach is used. The only variable cost is the cost of the
general contractor's markup. Typically, general contractors add 13-15% markup on the
cost of their work and the work of their subcontractors. Earth Tech will run the job for
7%. By contracting directly with the subcontractors, and escrowing a contingency fund,
the Village assumes most of the general contractor's risk and eliminates the need to pay
the general contractor's profit. Therefore, the potential exists to realize as much an 8%
savings on this job by utilizing a construction management approach instead of the
traditional design/bid/build approach.
Staff recognizes that any discussion about cost savings using one approach instead of
another is purely hypothetical. The only way to determine actual savings is to garner
actual numbers from a post-mortem review of a built project that somehow utilized both
approaches. However, staff would like to emphasize that a potential exists to save
money if a construction management approach is used on this project.
More importantly, utilizing a construction management approach on this project
guarantees that the project will be run well. Earth Tech has extensive experience in
construction management. They are currently performing this role for the City of
Chicago on a multi-year, multi-million dollar renovation of Midway Airport. In addition,
Earth Tech also has had extensive experience with several Village of Mount Prospect
infrastructure improvement projects including the Hatlen Heights Sanitary Sewer
Improvements, the Prospect ManodNorth Main Sewer Improvements, the Fairview
Gardens Sanitary Sewer Improvements, the SeeGwun/Milbum Sanitary Sewer
Improvements, the Maple/Berkshire Sanitary Sewer Improvements, and Reach A1 of the
Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project. This experience, combined with Earth
Tech's extensive involvement with the Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee, makes them the
best, most logical choice for the job.
Staff recognizes that Reach A2 is an expensive, highly visible project staged in close
proximity to private homes. Once built, it will significantly change the way a
neighborhood has looked for generations. For these reasons, staff feels that the
age 4 of 4
Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project Reach A2 Construction Inspection & Construction Management Proposal
July 13, 2000
importance of effective construction management on this project cannot be
overemphasized.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the Village Board accept the proposal from Earth Tech, Inc. of Oak
Brook, Illinois and authorize a contract to provide both construction inspection and
construction management services for the Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization
Project Reach A2 for a cost not-to-exceed $160,000 plus 7% of final construction costs.
Funding for this proposed expenditure is available in account number 5907704-690102
($2,420,000) on page 287 of the current budget.
Sean P. Dorsey
I concur.
Director of Public Works
Eric.: (2)
SPD/spd
Cc; Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler
File
C:\SEWERS\FLOOD\CRUMLEY MELAS WEDGEWOOD\CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROSPOSAL RECOMMENDATION.DOC
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FOR
WELLER CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION- PHASE H
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Earth Tech will provide Construction Management services for the construction of the
Weller Creek Streambank S~abilization - Phase I/project. The project consists of
stabilizing the existing streambanks from Elmhurst Road to the beginning of the Phase I
project and from Emerson Street to 1,300 feet east of Emerson. The project will utilize
steel sheet piling and A-jacks to stabilize the erosion along this reach of Weller Creek.
Because of the nature of the improvements the construction does not lend itself to
awarding a single contract to a General Contractor for execution ofthe work. The
Village proposes to use a Construction Manager as the Village's agent to manage and
supervise specialized contractors to execute the work on Weller Creek. The specialty
contractors will bid competitively individual specialty contracts, such as sheet pile
installation and landscaping, which will be approved and awarded by the Village. The
individual construction contracts will be between the Village and the contractor.
Earth Tech will be responsible for coordinating, scheduling, and quality assurance over
the individual contractors. Earth Teeh will be responsible to deliver the project that
meets the intended requirements of the Village that have been identified in the
construction documents prepared by the Engineer.
B. THE CONSTRUCTION TEAM
The Construction Manager accepts the relationship of trust and confidence with the
Village that is established by this proposal. He covenants with the Village to furnish his
best skill and judgement and to cooperate with the engineer in furthering the interests of
the Village. Earth Tech agrees to furnish efficient business administrution and
superintendence and to use our best efforts to complete the project in an expeditious and
economical manner consistent with the interest of the Village.
1. The Construction Team. The Construction Manager, the Village~ and the
engineer, called the "Construction Team" shall work from design through
construction completion. The Construction Manager shall provide leadership to
the construction team on all matters relating to construction.
2. Definitions: the project is the total construction to be performed under this
proposal. The work is that part of the construction that the Construction Manager
supervises and is executed by specialty contractors. The term day shall mean
calendar day unless otherwise designated.
C. CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS SERVICES
The Construction manager will perform the following services under this agreement in
each of the two phases described below.
1. Design Phase
1.1 Consultation during Project Development: Attend regular meetings with the
engineer during the development of conceptual and preliminary design to advise on
site requirements, selection of materials, and construction contract packaging.
Provide recommendations on construction feasibility, availability of materials and
labor, time requirements for construction, and factors related to cost.
1.2 Scheduling: Develop a project schedule that coordinates and integrates the
engineer's design efforts with the construction requirements. Include the Village's
requirements for the delivery of the completed project.
1.3 Project construction budget: Prepare a project budget as soon as major project
requirements have been identified and update periodically for the Village's
approval. Refine and update this budget as the development of the drawings and
specifications proceeds.
1.4 Coordination of contract documents: Review the drawings and specifications as
they are being prepared, recommending alternative solutions whenever design
details affect construction feasibility or construction contract packaging.
1.5 Contract packaging: Make recommendations to the Village and engineer regarding
the division of work in the drawings and specifications to facilitate the bidding and
award of specialty constraetiun contracts. This effort is intended to allow phased
construction talcing into account such factors as time of performance, availability of
contractors, overlapping contractor jurisdiction, and provisions for temporary
facilities.
1.6 Drawing and specification review : Review the drawings and specifications with the
engineer to eliminate areas of conflict, work assignment shortfall, and overlapping
in the work performed by the specialty contractors.
1.7 Bid assistance: Assist the Village in seeking qualified specialty contractors,
prequalification of contractors, and notice of competitive bids. Establish bid date
with the Village and attend bid opening. Review contractor bids and prepare
recommendation of award to the Village.
1.8 Contract award: Assist the Village in the preparation of contract documents and
prepare notices of award to approved contractors.
1.9 Preconstruction Survey: Perform preconstruction inspections of homes in west
reach to document existing conditions of foundations, walls and other components.
Perform preconstruction videotape of work area to document existing conditions.
2. Construction Phase
2.1 Project control: Monitor the work of the specialty contractors and coordinate the
work activities and responsibilities of the Village, engineer, and construction
manager to complete the project in accordance with the Village's objectives of cost,
time and quality.
2.2 Maintain staffat the project site to coordinate and provide general direction of the
work and progress of the specialty contractors on the project.
2.3 Establish on-site organization and lines of authority in order to carry out the overall
plans of the Construction Team.
2.4 Establish procedures for coordination among the owner, engineer, specialty
contractors, and construction manager with respect to all aspects of the project and
implement such procedures.
2.5 Schedule and conduct progress meetings at which the specialty contractors, Village
representatives, engineer, and construction manager can discnss jointly such matters
as procedures, progress, problems, and scheduling.
2.6 Provide regular monitoring of the construction schedule as the construction
progresses. Identify potential variances between scheduled and probable completion
dates. Review schedule for work not started or incomplete and recommend to the
Village and specialty contractor adjustments in the schedule to meet the plmmed
completion date. Provide summary reports of each monitoring and document all
changes in schedule.
2.7 Determine the adequacy of the specialty contractor personnel and equipment and the
availability of materials to meet the schedule. Recommend to the Village and the
specialty contractor coumes of action to correct deficiencies.
2.8 Physicalconstruction: Provide the supervision ofthe specialty contractom to assure
that they are furnishing all labor, materials, construction equipment, and tools
necessary for the completion of the project in accordance with the plans and
specifications. The construction manager will not furnish any construction labor,
equipment, or materials. Should there be any items of work that have been
inadvertently left out of the specialty contracts the construction manager will make a
recommendation to the Village a change order to a specialty contractors contract to
cover the work necessary. The specialty contractors will obtain performance and
payment bonds.
2.9 Cost control: Develop and monitor a system for project cost control. Revise and
refine the approved project construction budget, incorporate approved change orders
as they occur, and develop forecasts as needed.
2.10 Ma'mta'm cost accounting records on authorized work performed under unit costs,
actual costs for labor and material or other bases requiring accounting records.
Afford the Village access to these records and preserve them for a period of threc
years after final payment.
2.11 Change orders: Develop and implement a system for the preparation, review,
processing, and payment of change Orders. Recommend necessary or desirable
changes to the Village and the engineer, review requests for changes, submit
recommendations to the Village and the engineer, and assist in negotiating change
orders with specialty contractors.
2.12 Payments to specialty contractors: Develop and implement a procedure for the
review, processing and payment of applications by the specialty contractors for
progress and final payment. Develop and implement a procedure to obtain interim
and final waivem of lien with progress payment applications.
2.13 Permits and fees: Assist the Village and engineer in obta'ming special permits, this
exclude any permits required by the specialty contractors as a due coume of them
doing business. Assist the Village in obtaining approval from authorities having
jurisdiction over the project.
2.14 Inspection: Inspect the work of the specialty contractors for defects and
deficiencies. Direct specialty contractors to correct defects and deficiencies.
2.15 Safety: The specialty contractors will be responsible for their own safety programs.
The construction manager will be responsible for Earth Tech's personnel. If the
construction manager notes any safety violations which impacts on his ability to
complete his assigned work the specialty contractors will be notified of said
deficiencies noting that the work cannot be inspected and therefore not eligible for
progress payment.
2.16 Document interpretation: Refer all questions for interpretation of the documents
prepared by the engineer to the engineer.
2.17 Shop drawings: In collaboration with the engineer, establish and implement
procedures for expediting the processing and approval of shop drawings.
2.18 Reports andproject site documents: Record the progress ofttie project in a daily
diary and daily inspection reports. Submit to the Village and the engineer written
progress reports, including information on the specialty contractor work, and the
percentage of completion.
2.19 Mainta'm atthe project site, on a current basis: records of all necessary contracts,
drawings, materials, and other construction related documents, including revisions.
Obtain data ~om specialty contractors and maintain a current set of record drawings
and specifications. Atthe completion of the project deliver all such records to the
Village.
2.20 Substantial completion: Determine substantial completion of the work or
designated portions thereof and prepare for the engineer a list of incomplete or
unsatisfactory work and a schedule for their completion.
2.21 Final completion: Determine final completion and provide written notice to the
Village that work is ready for final inspection. Secure and transmit to the Village all
required waivers of lien, releases or waivers. Turn over to the Village record
drawings.
2.22 Warranty: All work performed by the specialty contractors will be warranted per
the construction contract documents. The construction manager will assist the
Village in the resolution of warranty issues.
2.23 Public relaaons: Because of the impact of this project on the residents of the
Village, the construction manager will develop and implement a public notification
program for the residents along the affected portions of Weller Creek. This
notification program will be monthly updates on the construction and daily
notification to those residents that will be affected by any construction activity.
D. VILLAGE'S RESPONSIBILITY
I. The Village shall provide full information regarding their requirements for the
project.
2. The Village shall designate a representative who shall be fully acquainted with the
project and has the authority to act on the behalf of the Village.
3. The Village has retained under separate agreement the services ora design engineer
to prepare the project documents.
4. The Village will furnish all access and easement documents required for completing
the project.
5. The Village will provide all legal services required completing item D.4.
6. The construction manager will be furnished field office and equipment to operate the
field office as part of the construction management fee.
7. The Village will fumish the insurance and bonds for the project through the specialty
contractors contract documents.
8. Any services, information, surveys and reports provided by other consultants to
complete this project will provide the information to the construction manager at the
Villages expense. The construction manager shall be entitled to rely on the accuracy
and completeness of the provided information.
9. If the Village becomes aware of any fault or defect in the project or non-conformance
with the drawings and specifications shall give prompt written notice to the
construction manager.
10. The Village shall communicate with the specialty contractors only through the
construction manager.
11. The Village shall authorize and control the use ora contingency fund, This fund
shall be 10 % of the total mount of the specialty contractors bid prices. The purpose
of this contingency fund is to cover the possibilities of items 0fwork being
inadvertently left out ora specialty contractor scope of work. Tiffs fund is not
intended to be used for Added work approved by the Village.
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
Timothy J. Corcoran Velma Lowe
Paul Wm. Hoefert
ch dM. Village of Mount Prospect
Dennis G. Prikkal Phone: 847/S18-5328
Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/818-5329
~ K. wi~s 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD: 847/392-6064
NOTICE
THE MONDAY, JULY 17, 2000 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS
BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT
MEETING.
Dated this 1 lth day of July, 2000.
Mount Prospect Public Works Clepartment
1700 W. I~enteel Road, Mount PeoepeoC, Illinois
Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 TDD 847/392-1235
. AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT SOLID WASTE COMMISSION
July 20, 2000
CONFERENCE ROOM B, PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD
7:30 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. CITIZEN FORUM
IV. SOLID WASTE PROGRAMS/DATA
V. PUBLIC EDUCATION EVENTS
· Public Works Open House
· Fourth of July Parade
VI. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION(S)
· SWANCC (June24,2000)
· MWRD and local municipalities (application submitted)
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. NEXT MEETING
IX. ADJOURNMENT
ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A
DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE PLEASE CONTACT PUBLIC
WORKS AT 870-5640, TDD 392-1235.
x:lusem/lisa/word/swjulag00.DOC
Recycled Paper ~ Printed with Soy Ink
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
T o y,. oo o p .l Wm. Hoef Village of Mount P r ospect
P~char d M. Lohrs~orfer
~s~. P~k~ Community Development Department ~ho~: 847/392-6000
Michaele W. Skowron Fax:847/392-6022
k~ ~. wi~ 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD:~47/392-60~n
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
2"a Floor Conference Room Wednesday
Village Hall July 19~ 2000
100 South Emerson Street 7:00 p.m.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. June21, 2000
IV. SUBDIVISIONS
None
V. OLD BUSINESS
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing
· Discussion of preliminary 2001 Community Development Block Grant
funding recommendations
B. Action on 2001 Community Development Block Grant funding recom-
mendations
C. Action on 2001 Action Plan with approved 2001 funding recommendations
VII. COMMENTS/OTHER BUSINESS
· VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this m~eting,, but because of a disability needs some
accommodation to participate~ should contact the Community Development Department at
100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056,847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TIlE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
June 22, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Michael
Zadel at 7:02 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: Michael ZadeI, Chairman
Matt Sledz
Gary Growinkel
Carol Tortorello
William Reddy
Absent: Frank Boege
Antoinette Astreides
Edwin Janus
Village Staff Present: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
Misty Das, Planner
Others in Attendance: Chris Clair-Daily Herald
Dean Geroulis-Chicago Tribune
Vipul Amin-Judith Ann Resident
Yogesh Maniar-Judith Ann Resident
Yah Do-Judith Arm Resident
Rich Eide-Judith Ann Resident
April Foley-Mentor Program
Nancy Corry-Summer Adventure Program
Diane Kovaek-Clayground Inc.
Linnea Pioro-Camp Fire Boys and Girls
Victoria Bigelow-Access to Care
Alan Brostoff-Boy Scouts
Jere Teed-CEDA Northwest
Sharon Anderson-Club Rec Plex
Suzanne Skala-Resource Center for the Elderly
Eric Carpenter-Resources for Community Living
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chairman Zadel opened the meeting and asked if there were any questions or revisions. Carol Tortorello
pointed out that the minutes said "regular" meeting, not "special" ineeting and that those listed in "Others
in Attendance" were not distinguished by a title or agency. She also noted that on Page 2; the word
'kaised" was misspelled and should be "razed". Chairman Zadel entertained a motion to approve, the
minutes with revisions. Matt Sledz moved to approve the minutes and Bill Reddy seconded the motion.
The motion was approved 5-0.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Page 2
Minutes of June 21, 2000 Meeting
SUBDIVISIONS:
NONE
OLD BUSINESS:
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
Community Development Block Grant Presentations
Chairman Zadel opened the Public Hearing at 7:04 p.m. and said that applicants applying for CDBG
funds would present their requests in the order of Plan Commission's packet of applications. Chairman
Zadel asked Ms. Das to give a brief introduction about the meeting. Ms. Das said that the purpose of the
hearing was for applicants to describe their program and provide Plan Commission members an
opportunity to ask questions about the program and/or agency prior to the Plan Commission making
funding recommendations to the Village Board.
Chairman Zadel said the amount of the total CDBG grant is unknown at this time and that HUD
regulations limit the amount of funds spent on public service activities to 15% of the amount of the grant.
lie said that the funding decision would be estimated based on the current year's allocation of $356,000.
2001 CDBG applicants presented their programs and gave Plan Coranfission the opportunity to ask
questions. Presenters and their requests were:
Amount
Speaker A~enc¥ Pro~ram Requested
Dianne Kovack Clayground Inc. Teaching ceramics $10,000
Capital Improvements $15,000
Linnea Pioro Camp Fire Boys and Girls New Horizons $I0,000
Camp Kool $15,000
Alan Brostoff Boy Scouts Learning for Life $10,000
Sharon Anderson Club ReePlex MP Park District $3,000
Suzanne Skala Resource Center for the Senior Shared Housing $3,500
Elderly
Victoria Bigelow Suburban Primary Health Access to Care $10,500
Care
Jere Teed CEDA Northwest Transitional Apartment Living $8,500
Sprinkler System $20,000
Mark Parr Children's Advocacy Center Family Support Services $3,000
Erie Carpenter Resources for Community Support services for $5,000
Living developmentally disabled
Misty Das VOMP Infrastructure improvements $485,000
Chairman Zadel thanked all of the applicants for their presentations and temporarily adjourned the public
hearing at 8:35p.m. He asked Ms: Das to give a brief introduction about the Judith Ann residents who
were in attendance. Ms. Das explained that the Village was currently working with Judith Ann residents
and HUD to quaYlfy their area as 'a low/moderato income' area. This would allow the Village to
potentially invest CDBG funds into the area for the needed street and maintenance improvements. Rich
Eide, an owner of a Judith Ann townhouse explained the history of the Judith Ann involvement with the
Village.' He was happy that the neighborhood had come a long way in a short period of time and was ·
OUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Page 3
Minutes of June 21, 2000 Meeting
currently forming a Homeowner's Association. This association would address the unique needs
associated with the neighborhood. Bill Reddy and Carol Tortorello expressed their pleasure as to how the
neighborhood has helped itself, and noted that was a positive factor in considering funding decisions
concerning theft neighborhood. Plan Commission members thanked the residents for their presentation
and commended their neighborhood on a tremendous effort.
Chairman Zadel opened a Public Hearing at 9:25 p.m. to discuss the 2000 Action Plan Amendment. He
asked Ms. Das to briefly expIain the program to the Plan Commission members who were not familiar
with the proposal. Ms. Das explained that the funds for the program were coming from the unanticipated
funds of the current year's CDBG allocation. Ms. Das explained that this program would create
affordable housing options for low-income homebuyers and would also accomplish the affordable
housing objective stated in the 2000 Consolidated Plan. Carol Tortorello moved to approve the 2000
Action Plan Amendment and Bill Reddy seconded the motion, and the 2000 Action Plan Amendment was
approved 5-0.
Chairman Zadel re-opened the Public Hearing for 2001 funding requests at 9:40 p.m. Mr. Eric Carpenter,
representing Resources for Community Living, presented his organization%.request. The Public Hearing
was closed at 9:55p.m.
COMMENTS AND OTH ~;R BUSINESS:
Chairman Zadel asked if anyone had any comments about changing the meeting time of regular Plan
Commission meetings from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. There were no comments and Chairman Zadel
entertained a motion to change the time of the meeting. Bill Reddy moved to approve the change in
meeting time for regular Plan Commission meeting and Carol Tortorello seconded the motion, which was
approved 5-0.
Carol Tortorello moved to adjourn the meeting and Bill Reddy seconded the motion. The motion carded
5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
Michael H Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development
M~isty Das, I~ann~'~
H:\GEN~PLNG\CDBG~PC MemosUune2 lminutes.d0e
Attachment A
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
June 14, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The special meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman
Michael Zadel at 7:02 p.m. at the Village I-Iall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect,
Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Antoinette Astreides
Edwin Janus
William Reddy
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Frank Boege
Gary Grouwinkel
Village Staff Present: Judy Cormolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Chuck Lindelof, P.E., Project Engineer
Others in Attendance: Todd Tageson~Fxtuiva (Shell)
Peter Balmes-Warren Johnson Architects
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chainmn Zadel opened the meeting and said that the minutes would be reviewed after the Development
Code exception request was heard. The Development Code case was completed and Chairman Zadel
revisited Approval of the Minutes. He asked if there were any questions or revisions. As there were none,
Carol Tortorello moved to approve the minutes and Bill Reddy seconded the motion. The motion was
approved with Tonie Astreides and Ed Janus absta~'mg.
SUBDMSIONS:
NONE
OLD BUSINESS:
PC-05-2000/Development Code Exception/2 E. Rand Road (Shell Gas Station)
Chairman Zadel introduced the first item of business and asked Judy Connolly to review the case. Ms.
Connolly said that the petitioner, She11'Oi1, proposes to improve an existing Shell Gas Station at the comer
of Rand and Kensington Roads. She said that the project includes removing the outdoor kiosk/attendant
box and constructing a 420 'square foot addition onto the existing car wash to accommodate the cashier and
a small amount of retail space. She said. that the Development Code applies to the project because the
remodeled structure will have retail space, which requires two parking sPaces.. She said that the petitioner
is seeking an exception to the Development Code for storm water detention and proposes not to provide
storm water detention.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of Jtme 14, 2000 Meeting Page 2
She said that currently there is no stormwater detention for the site and that the Village is not
aware of any drainage or floocF~ng problems. The petitioner's plans include reducing the amount
of impervious surface to approximately 67% and installing landscaping around the perimeter of
the property. Ms. Connolly said that the property is bounded by two IDOT roads and is reqtfired
to follow their regulations in addition to the Village's regulations. Furthermore, the size, shape,
and the fact that the site is a gas station imposes further constraints on viable locations for
stormwater detention. She said that the petitioner is not changing the tanks, gas pumps or the
canopy, which also limits the amount of fle:dbility in locating the detention. Therefore, the
permitted locations for the detention do not allow for sufficient capacity or the appropriate
manner to provide detention.
Ms. Connolly said that staff recommends approval of the petitioner's Development Code
exception request and not provide storm water detention with the condition that the landscape
plan be consistent with the Village's proposed Corridor Design Gffldeline requirements. She said
that Chuck Lindelof from the Village's Engineering Division and representatives of the petitioner
were available to answer questions about the project.
Todd Tageson, representative of the petitioner, said that IDOT reviewed th~ reconfigured access
to the site. He presented the final design and said that the revised design approved by IDOT
reduced the amount of impervious surface to less than 65%.
There was general discussion about the amount of lot coverage and how the increase in green
space would significantly benefit the site. Chairman Zadel said that the mn-off from the site
sheet drains into Rand Road and that he is not aware of any drainage problems at the site. Bill
Reddy agreed and asked if the new projects occurring around Rand/Kensington/Elmhurst Roads
were reviewed together. Chuck Lindelof said that the projects were reviewed separately for
detention reqff~rements and Mr. Tageson added that IDOT reviewed access to Shell and the
proposed CVS site, across the street, together to ensure optimal traffic flow and access to the
sites.
There was discussion about redeveloping a site as opposed to improving a site and how the
Village codes were applied. Matt Sledz compared the projects at 1 E. Rand Road and 1 W. Rand
Road to complete redevelopment projects because the existing structures were razed, in contrast
to Shell's improvement project, where primary structures were not changed but the project
significantly improved the property.
There was general discussion about the proposed retail space and what items would be sold; the
impact of the remodeling on the car wash stacking space, and access for the tanker tracks. Peter
Balmes said that the stacking and access issues were reviewed by Shell's internal design team
before they submitted plans to the Village. He said that Shell reviews plans to make sure the
tankers can access the site easily and to determine what, if any, impacts will result if the station is
remodeled.
There was further discussion about the project and how the petitioner had a legitimate hardship
.because of the size and shape of the property and that the reduced amount of impervious surface
would be an asset to the site. Carol Tortorello moved to approve the Development Code
exeeptien and not require the petitioner to provide stormwater detention for 2 E. Rand Road and
that the site be landscaped in a manner consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines.
Bill Reddy seconded the motion, which was approved 6-0.
OUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of June 14, 2000 Meeting Page 3
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
COMMENTS AND OT~E,R BUSINESS:
There was general discussion about starting the Plan Commission meetings at 7 p.m. It was
agreed that the June 21 meeting would start at 7 p.m. because agencies and service groups would
be making presentations to obtain CDBG funds and that it would be easier for the presenters to
have an earlier start time, as opposed to a meeting that ran later. Plan Commission members
requested that meeting "start time" be a June 21, 2000 agenda item and formal action would be
taken at that time.
Bill Reddy moved to adjourn the meeting and Tonie Asterieds seconded the motion. The motion
carried 6-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m.