HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 06/20/2000Next Ordinance No. 5117
Next Resolution No. 26-00
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South Emerson Street June 20, 2000
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks
Ill. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Corcoran
IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Prikkel
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 6, 2000
VI. APPROVE BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PRESENTATION: Mount Prospect Jaycees 2000 Keith Baker Scholarship Award
B. Appointments
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT I00 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064.
IX. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 10-2000, 507 S. Wille Street
2"d reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 507 SOUTH WILLE STREET (Exhibit A)
This ordinance grants a variation to allow the construction of a 672 sq. ft. two-car
detached garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-2 to approve the request,
however, the Village Code requires at least four (4) votes for approval. The Village
Board approved the request with a vote of 5-2.
B. ZBA 18-2000, 1610 W. Algonquin Road
1. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
WITH RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-4
TO B-3 DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1610 W. ALGONQUIN ROAD (Exhibit B)
This ordinance rezones the subject property from R-4 (Multi-family
Development) to B-3 (Community Shopping) District, located on the
north side of Algonquin Road, east of Busse Road. The Zoning Board
of Appeals has voted 6-0 for approval of this request.
2. 1St reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1610 W. ALGONQUIN ROAD (Exhibit C)
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit for the construction of a
stand-alone parking lot on the north side of Algonquin Road, east of Busse
Road. The Zoning Board has voted 6-0 for approval of this request.
C. ZBA 19-2000, 503 S. Main Street
The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use permit to construct a three (3) car
attached garage as part of a new home at 503 S. Main Street. The Zoning Board
of Appeals voted 6-0 for approval. (This item was deferred from the June 6
Village Board meeting).
X. NEW BUSINESS
A. PC 05-2000, 2 East Rand Road
The petitioner is requesting an exception from the Development Code, Section
16.405, to waive the requirement for on-site stormwater detention. The Plan
Commission voted 6-0 for approval of this request.
B. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF
CERTAIN PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 411 BUSINESS CENTER
DRIVE (Exhibit D)
This ordinance authorizes the Village to purchase the subject property in
order to obtain right-of-way for roadway improvements necessary to realign
the Harvest Lane/Business Center Drive intersection.
C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN PROPERTY (PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY) OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit E)
This ordinance allows for the vacation of a portion of the public right-of-way
at the corner of Sunset Road and Robert Drive.
D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CHICAGO ALLIANCE
FOR BULK ELECTRICAL PURCHASES (Exhibit F)
This ordinance authorizes the Village to enter into an agreement with the
Chicago Alliance, a group of over sixty municipalities, to consider electrical
suppliers, as alternatives to Commonwealth Edison.
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 2
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT pROSPECT, ENTITLED "RULES
OF ORDER" (Exhibit G)
This ordinance amends Chapter 2 of the Village Code by adopting the
Consent Agenda as a part of the order of business.
Xl. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Creek cleaning/tree trimming/tree removal project
2. Pavement marking/striping on Village streets and lots
B. Request for approval of purchase of network operating system upgrades
and network management software
C. Status Report
Xll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Xlll. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JUNE 6, 2000
CALL CALL TO ORDER
TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL
ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Paul Hoefert (arrived late)
Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PLEDGE Trustee Corcoran led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATIOiN INVOCATION
Trustee Prikkel gave the invocation
APPROVAL OF BILLS
BILLS Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to approve payment of the
following [3ills:
General Fund $ 795,460
Refuse Disposal Fund 142,377
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 287,745
Local Law Enforcement BIk Grant Fund 1997 880
Community Development Block Grant Fund 16,182
Debt Service Funds 118,195
Capital Improvement Fund 59,367
Capital Improvement Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Const. Fund 26,103
Street Improvement Construction Fund
Flood Control Construction Fund 43,399
Water & Sewer Fund 41,377
Parking System Revenue Fund 18
Vehicle Maintenanca Fund 12,929
Vehicle Replacement Fund 9,611
Computer Replacement Fund
Risk Management Fund 134,570
Police Pension Fund 29,836
Fire Pension Fund 27,417
Flexcomp Trust Fund 19,625
Escrow Deposit Fund 22.736
Benefit Trust Funds 544
$1,788,371
(Trustee Hoefert arrived during the presentation of bills)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corooran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MINUTES APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held.May 16, 2000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corooran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MAYOR'S
REPORT MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Farley presented a proclamation to First Class Sgt. Billy Hill of the United States
Army, recognizing United States Army Week, June 12-18, 2000.
YOUTH Allicen Prikkel, representing the Mount Prospect Youth Commission, presented the
COMMISSION annual report of the Youth Commission's activities, achievements, and goals.
ANNUAL
REPORT A resolution was presented stating the Village's support of a feasibility study relative to
the extension of mass transit opportunities to the Northwest Corridor. The Villages of
NW TRANSIT Sohaumburg, Hoffman Estates, and Elk Grove Village, along the City of Rolling Meadows
CORRIDOR are currently participating in the study.
STUDY
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel moved for approval of Resolution
No. 24-00:
RES.
NO. 24-00 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONTINUED STUDY FOR THE NORTHWEST
TRANSIT CORRIDOR
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPTS. There were no board or commission appointments made at this meeting.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
CITIZENS There were no comments from the audience.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 10-2000 ZBA 10-2000, 507 S. Wille Street
507 S. WILLE An ordinance was presented for first reading to grant a variation for an oversized, 672
ST. sq. ft., two-car detached garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals had previously voted 3-2
to approve the request, and the Village Board had voted 5-2 for approval.
Mayor Farley stated the petitioner had submitted a request for the first reading of the
ordinance to be waived, however, for lack of a motion to waive it, this first reading stood,
and the ordinance will be presented again at the June 20 meeting for second reading.
ZBA 12-2000 ZBA 12-2000, 1500 E. Euclid Avenue
1500 E. An ordinance was presented'for first reading to grant a variation for the construction of a
EUCLID AVE. 120 foot tall personal wireless communication facility at Weiss Memorial Park. The Code
allows for monopole structures up to 70 feet in height. The Zoning Board of Appeats had
voted 5-0 for approval of this request.
Trustee Prikkel, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowren, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5111 No. 5111:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 1500 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - June 6, 2000
ZBA 11-2000 ZBA 11-2000, 1108 S. Robert.Drive
1108 S. An ordinance was presented for. ifirSt leading to grant a Conditional Use permit to allow a
ROBERT DR. front porch addition to encroac~h ~U~: feet ihto the front yard setback. The Zoning Board
of Appeals had voted 5-0 for approval.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel. moved to waive the rule requ{nng two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowro~ moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5112 No. 5112:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIOI~AL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 1108 SOUTH ROBERT DRIVE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert, Prikkel. Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 14-2000 ZBA 14-2000, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE OF An ordinance was presented for first reading which would amend Chapter 14 (Zoning) of
MOUNT the Village Code relative to the modification of public notice requirements for text
PROSPECT amendments.
TEXT
AMENDMENT Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requ~nng two
readings of an ordinance,
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: Prikkel
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5113 No. 5113:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPYER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Farley
Nays: Prikkel, Wilks
Motion carried.
GENERAL An ordinance was presented for second reading, which would authorize the issuance of
OBLIGATION $2,165,000 of general obligation bonds for flood control improvements.
BONDS
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5114:
NO. 5114
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SALE OF A resolution was presented, which would authorize the Village to enter into a contract
WATER TO SSA with the Social Security Administration, for the sale of water to its office in Prospect
Heights.. This resolution was deferred from the May 16 meeting, as some of the contract
details were not finalized.
Page 3 -June 6, 2000
RES, Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved for approval of Resolution
No. 25-00:
NO. 25-00
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
7BA 18-2000 ZBA 18-2000, 1610 W. Algonquin Road
1610 W. Requests were presented for the rezoning of the subject property, from R-4 (Multi-family
ALGONQUIN Development) to Bo3 (Community Shopping) district, and for a Conditional Use permit to
RD. allow the construction of a 519 space, stand-alone parking lot on the north side of
Algonquin Road, east of Busse Road. The Zoning Board had recommended approval of
both requests by a vote of 6-0.
Representatives of United Airlines, the petitioner, satisfactorily addressed concerns of the
Board relative to stormwater detention, fencing, and landscaping of the property.
Trustee Hoefert inquired as to whethei consideration had been given to the idea of being
annexed into the Village, and was assured that United's senior management personnel
would be informed and would consider a meeting in the future to discuss the merits of
such proposal.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the recommendation
of the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant the request in ZBA 18-2000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Ordinances for the rezoning and Conditional Use permit will be presented for first reading
at the June 20 Village Board meeting.
ZBA 19-2000 ZBA 19-2000, 503 S. Main Street
503 S. MAIN ST. William Cooney, Director of Community Development, informed the Board that his staff
had, earlier in the day, received notice from the petitioner, requesting a withdrawal of his
request for a three (3) car attached garage. As Mr. Cooney was unable to verify the
petitioner's intent Prior to the meeting, he requested a deferral of ZBA 19-2000, to the
June 20 meeting.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to defer ZBA t9-2000 to the
June 20, 2000 meeting. .
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowren, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PARADE A resolution was presented to request the closure of a certain portion of Central Road in
STREET order to conduct the annual Fourth of July parade.
CLOSURE
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of Resolution
RES. No. 26-00:
NO. 26-00
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CLOSURE OF A PORTION OF CENTRAL ROAD
IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A PARADE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Coreoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 -June 6,2000
ACQU RE An ordinance was presented, which would authorize the purchase of property at 20 West
PROPERTY @ Busse Avenue.
20 W. BUSSE
AVE. Trustee Wilks noted an item in the real estate contract to be revised; Village Manager
Michael Janonis, stated he would see that the amendment is made prior to the executior
of the contract.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance,
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefed, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5115 No. 5115:
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 20 WEST BUSSE AVENUE
Upon roll caIl: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried,
PREVAILING An ordinance was presented for first reading, which adopts the prevailing wage rates
WAGE RATES established by the State of Illinois for public works projects provided by contractors.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5116 No. 5116:
AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF THE PREVAILING WAGE
RATES
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Director of Public Works, Glen Andler presented bid results.
BID RESULTS:
The following bid results were received for the year 2000 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program:
SHARED COST
SIDEWALK BIDDERS TOTAL BID
PROGRAM G & M, Inc. $133,374.50
Globe Construction, Inc. 173,370.00
Schroeder and Schroeder, Inc. 146,901.75
G & M, INC. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skcwron, moved to concur with the
recommendation of staff to award the contract for the sidewalk program to G & M, Inc. in
an amount not to exceed $141,677.64.
Page 5 -June 6, 2000
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert. Prikkel. Skowron. Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
UNIFORM
The following bid results were received for a 36-month uniform rental and cleaning
RENTAL & contract for Public Works maintenance personnel:
CLEANING
BIDDERS COST PER YEAR
Cintas $15,688.56
American Industrial 11,652.68
AMERICAN Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with the recommendation
INDUSTRIAL of staff to award a 36-month contract to American Industrial of Chicago, Illinois, for
uniform rental and contract.
Upon rollcall: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron. Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
STREET A request was presented for Board approval of the year 2000 street crack sealing award,
CRACK to repair streets that have been paved in the last 4 or 5 years, and have begun to
SEALING deteriorate, or crack. Mr. Andler explained that the Village typically works with the
Northwest Municipal Conference by entering into a joint contract for this project, in order
to keep costs at a minimum.
The following bids were received for the 2000 crack sealing project:
BIDDER PRICE PER LB.
Scodeller Construction $ .97
Behm Construction $1.044
(NWMC fee of $.02 per lbs. will be assessed on each bill)
BEHM Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of the joint contract
PAVEMENT through the NWMC to accept the lowest bid from Behm Pavement i:or an amount not to
exceed $41,210.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
LUST, A request was presented for Board ratification of an expenditure of $10,214 to K Plus
PRO PERTY Environmental Services, previously authorized by the Village Manager. Mr. Andler
CLEAN-UP @ 3 explained that during the clean-up of property at 3 West Central, recently purchased by
W. CENTRAL the Village, a tank was discovered, along with contaminated soil. This required prompt
RD. action, and procedures are being taken to satisfy all requirements of the State Fire
Marshal office, and the Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with the recommendation
of staff to accept the proposal from K Plus for $10,214 to provide professional
engineering and analytical laboratory services necessary to file a Corrective Action
Completion Report with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. The motion
included the provision that K Plus is authorized to exceed the proposed amount on an
appropriate unit cost basis, in the event the excavation necessary to remediate the site
exceeds 1,200 square feet.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corooran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried,
Page 6 -June 6, 2000
DEEP WELL A request was presented for Board a~proval to accept a proposal for the evaluation ane
NO. 17 REHAB repair of Deep Well No. 17~ Iob~[e~ ~n vi lage property at 1480 N. Elmhurst Road. Mr.
Andler explained the rehabilitation is 'being done as part of a plan incorporated in 1996.
whereby each of the Village's five deep wells would be routinely assessed, as they are
not used regularly, rather only for emergency back-up water sources. The other four
wells have already been rehabbed, and this is the last of this plan.
Proposals were received from the following companies:
BIDDER AMOUNT
Layr~e-Western $78,170.00
Municipal 78.660.00
LAYNE- Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert. moved to concur with the
WESTERN recommendation of staff to accept the proposal from Layne-Western for the rehabilitation
of Deep Well No. 17 in an amount not to exceed $78,170.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran. Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowren, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Under Status Report. the Village Manager reminded the audience that Saturday,
June 10, was the scheduled date for Coffee with Council. He stated that the schedule
COFFEE would be slightly different from the usual, with Coffee being from 9:00 - 10:00 a.m., and
W/COUNCIL 10:00 a.m.- noon being reserved for a five-year departmental plan being presented by
Fire Chief Michael Figolah, for the Fire Department. He explained that this schedule was
necessary due to seasonal absences (vacations, etc.) by several Board members.
COW
MEETING Mr. Janonis stated the June 13, 2000 Committee of the Whole meeting had been
CANCELLED cancelled.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
VILLAGE HALL Trustee Pdkkel stated the Village Hall Ad Hoc public forum, which was held June 3, was
AD HOC very successful, with at least 30-35 residents in attendance. The forum was held as an
FORUM opportunity to address questions from residents relative to the future construction of a
new Village Hall.
CLOSED CLOSED SESSION
SESSION Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to convene a Closed Session to
discuss the following:
PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (2) - "Collective negotiating matters between the public
body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary
schedules for one or more classes or employees."
LITIGATION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (11) - "Litigation, when an action against, affecting or on
behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or
administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or
imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the
minutes of the closed meeting."
upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran; Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carded.
RECONVENE RECONVENE
All Village Board members, with the exception of Trustee Lohrstorfer, and along with
Village Manager Michael Janonis, reconvened at 9:50 p.m.
Page 7 - June 6, 2000
Mr. Janonis requested for summer schedules from each Board member so that he could
determine availability for various meetings that need to take place over the summer.
He also requested and received permission from the Village Board to continue looking a
variations on the keystone logo previously presented by Wolff Clements and Associates.
Trustee Prikkel indicated that the Village Hail Ad Hoc Committee continued to work
toward issuing a final report by the end of June. He stated that the group is working well
together, and that substantive progress was being made.
There was no other business discussed in ooen session.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Trustee Skowron, and seconded by Trustee Wilks. the meeting was
adjourned at 9:55 p.m. on a unanimous vote.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Page 8 - June 6, 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
15-Jun-00
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 06/01/00 to Per Attached Credits/ Balance
05/3t/00 06/15/00 List of Bills Debits 06/15100
General Fund 7,781,168 203,662 496,225 7,488,606
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,559,267 52,195 115,325 1,496,137
Motor Fuet Tax Fund 1,487,948 251 128,243 1,359,957
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 10,801 0 9,025 1,776
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 59,492 (0) 15,192 44,300
Debt Service Funds 3,559,469 3,559,469
Capital Prqiects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 2,629,428 36,859 2,592,569
Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 53,951 53,951
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 179,953 179,953
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 289,982 1 56,121 233,861
Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,191,634 18,391 74,105 4,135,920
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,697 4,697
Flood Control Construction Fund 1,158,953 1,025 1,157,928
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 3,114,348 193,879 317,707 2,990,520
Parking System Revenue Fund 704,289 5,217 1,187 708,319
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 187,945 58 17,003 171,000
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,017,409 0 26,287 4,991,122
Computer Replacement Fund 256,711 256,711
Risk Management Fund 3,407,904 25,034 399,736 3,033,202
Trust & A~_encv Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,372,159 5,346 31,366,813
Fire Pension Fund 32,395,362 (0) 5,282 32,390,079
Flexcomp Trust Fund 9,592 8,599 19,797 (1,606)
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,493,256 19,139 16,194 1,496,202
Benefit Trust Funds 97,537 97,537
101,023,254 526,425 1,740,658 99,809,021
· REPOKT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY ~N1500 10:59 PAGE 1
~L~SE ID :
VILL~RE OF MOtif PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRESE~ED TO ThE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FEC~ Jl]NE 01 2000 TO JUNE 15 2000
DEPT %?2;DOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTiO~ AMOUNT
001
02919 303 CA~ ASSOCIATION, INC. SENIOR TARI RIDES 401.10
04708 ABC WILDLIFE SERVICE CALL 95.00
02557 ABM, INC. MAINTENANCE AGRE-,~NT 217.00
02257 AMAI/KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CTR. SEMINAR 7/14/00 507.00
01518 AMBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP., INC. MAINT CONT. 3/25-6/24 1200.00
MAINT CO~. 3/25-6/24 1200.00
2400.00
01561 AMERICAN CHARGE SERVICE SENIOR TAXI RIDES 153.50
01631 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. REGISTER J.BOORIS 195.00
01830 AMDE~ON ELEVATOR CO, MAIN~ OF ELEVATOAS 160.63
02219 ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES AMNUAL REPORT OFEICE SUPPLIES 50.09
02523 BARRETT, MICHAEL RZIMBb~SEMENT 30.00
02607 BC I~%NDSCAPE INC. TR~E PI~%.NTING 96.00
TREE PLANTING 6033.00
TR~E PI2~NTING 144.00
6273.00
05029 BEAVEK C~EK NURSERY TR~ES 1180.00
T~ES 2102.00
3282.00
01008 BNSSE'S F~OW~RS & GIFTS 5OW~ 83,00
FLO~ 125.50
F~O~tRS 204.00
412.50
01014 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEA/~ING PEOD 226.50
CLF, ARING PROD 226.50
CL~ADINU PEOD 226.50
CLRA~ING PROD 226.50
CLEANING PROD 226.50
CLONING PROD 226.50
CLEANING PROD 753.00
2112.00
04807 CAPITAL SUPPLY TONER 477.42
01049 C~ GOVERS~IENT, INC RECRARGARLE BATTERIES 136.36
TONER 320.00
TONER 442.52
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PACE 2
RELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FE~ JUNE 01 2000 TO JUNE 15 2000
DENNT VENDOR NUN VENDOR NAIVE INVOICE DESCRIPTION ~O~
898.88
01050 CEDA NORT~.~EST SELF-HELP CENT DONATION IN MEMORY 100.00
01058 CENTURY '.~S, INC SUPPLIES 47.26
01060 CRM~URY TiLE STAIR TRK.AD/ADBESIVIES 237.50
01084 CHICAGO TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION 206.80
RENEWAL SUBSCRIPTION 206.80
AD 867.00
1280.60
01097 CINTAS COEP UNIFORM RENTAL & CLEA~ING 544.84
UNIFORM EIPENSE 48. O0
CLEANING SERVICES 124.40
717.24
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. ACCT 5424180363688919 21.95
01118 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL FOR - 061500 700.00
PAYROLL FOR - 061500 190.00
890.00
04929 COLONIAL COACH LINES SERVICE 55.00
01153 CO~9~'NITY CAB CO. SENIOR TAXI RIDES 468.90
00308 CONNOLLY, JUDY RKIMB EXPENSES 94.94
04543 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 192.05
04007 CORRY, N~CY ANVANCE-SUPPLIRS 250.00
SUPPLIES 500.00
SUPPLIES 200.00
950.00
05010 CZBREPAR, ELIZAIBETH REBATE 350.00
01223 DAILY OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.98
BINDERS 133.13
171.11
05022 UNLAXEY, MARY REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 840.00
01279 DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS MAINT COVERAGE 292.50
05023 DOLAN, JOUN & CYNTHIA RiIL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 720.00
00319 DOUNEK, RICHARD REIMB EXPENSES 38.49
~PORT: APEOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 3
RELEASE ID :
VIL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OP TRUSTEES FROM JgNE 0I 2000 TO J~NE 15 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~OICE DESCRIPTION ANOU~
01298 D~WING BOLD !NC. SUPPLIES 425.87
05030 DTN CORPOk~TioN SUBSCRIBERS FEE 663.00
05015 EDLBAUER, O%~AR ~E~D 614.70
01340 5~BASSY COFFEE SERVICE COFFEE & SUPPLIES 62.55
01350 ENRAVOR PLUS SERVICE 580.00
02371 EN~IRON'~E},~TA£ SCIENCE & ENG.INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES 1256.79
01366 EXFERIAN SERVICE 36.65
01369 RAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SUPPLIES 101.00
01377 FEDERAL EXPESS CORP FED EX PICK UP 11.53
MISC.SEIPPING CBANGES 67.71
79.24
00329 FELL, ~DiTE B. DEPOSIT 95.00
00102 FIR PENSION ~ND PAYROLL FOR - 061500 12168.37
01418 FLORY, JA~£S M. TOILET S~T FOR STATION 13 22.96
05031 FOX RIDGE TREES 1870.00
TREES 2385.00
TFEES 2005.00
6260.00
01123 F~.NK CLESEN AND SONS, iNC. FLOW~ 3702.00
01197 FP, ANKLIN COVEY MASTER FILLER 23.28
01439 F~IEW~AN EiSENSTEIN ~R AND SC~{WANTZ, LLP AN~AL AUDIT-RRTIAL 4500.00
01475 GENE~L BINDING CORPOrATiON FIEE P~VENTION-COVER CLEAR 108.94
03962 GOLE~O, MICHEL DODSA CONCERT PERF. 350.00
05011 ~RASE, WILLIAN ~ND 280.00
01572 FEA~TH & RO~{f, INC. FLEX GAS LINE 114.90
01609 ~{OLY FANILY MEDICAL CENTER ?RE-~PLOY~E~T PHYSICALS 339.00
PR 5~OYME~ PHYSICALS 819.00
1158.00
01640 I-PAC DUES 150.00
01642 IACP RGISTER-R.PAVEO~K 175.00
00106 IOMA RETI~.NT TRUST - 401 PAYROLL FOR - 061500 316.93
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 4
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOONT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ J~NR 01 2000 TO ~0RE 15 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAMB I~OICE DESCRIPTION RMOUNT
ICMA-401 PLAN 468.19
785.12
00107 ICMA RETIRE}{ENT TRUST - 457 PAYROLL FOR - 061500 15369.08
00108 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF RD;ENUE PAYROLL FOR - 060200 42.43
PAYROLL FOR - 061500 17242.53
17284.96
00109 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETiRLMBNT PAYROLL FOR - 061500 237.00
01701 iLLINOIS PAPER CO. 3 HOLE PAPER 145.00
PAPER-POLICE 1039.60
PARER-FIRE 519.80
1704.40
01122 ILLINOIS STATE DISBUREE~F~ UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 061500 519.23
PAYROLL FOR - 061500 195.50
PAYROLL FOR - 061500 126.00
PAYROLL ROR - 061500 60.00
900.73
00353 JANONIS, MICBAEL E. LUNCH/MEETING 18.00
05024 JULIAXO, JA~ES OUTDOOR LIVING 25.98
00357 KADZIEL~WSKI, RONALD REIMBURSE REPENSRE 178.40
01794 RALE UNIFORMS, INC. BODY ARMOR REPLACRMENT 4697.00
BODY ~OR REPLACL~ENT 1540.00
~NIRORM SUPPLIES 2.95
BODY ARMOR REPLAC~ENT I155.00
7394.95
01811 REEFER'S PHAR}~ACY MEDICAL SUPPLIES 38.95
05013 KINCAID, KATBLREN R/R Tk~NSRER TAX REBATE 424.00
05032 KLERM NURSERY TREES 1312.00
TREES 646.00
1958.00
01827 KLEIN, THORPE AND JENKINS,LTD. LEGA~ FEES-APRIL 17226.91
04590 ~TZMER, ROBERT P. LINE DANCE CLASSES 320.00
01850 ~IK KOPY SOCIAL SERVICES FLYER 95.31
01851 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY ~R PLUGS/~FFS 201.32
05025 LINDSAY, ~BREY R. DAN R/E TRANSFER TAX MEBATE 600.00
· REPORT: AEBOARDRPT GENREATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN!500 10:59 PAGE 5
REL~RE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
LIST OF SILLS PREREVIED TO THE BOAND OF TRUSTEES F~OM ~l~H 0I 2000 TO J~NX 15 2000
UNiT VENDOR NSR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION
01918 LUNDSTR~'S NURSERY Pi~Lk'!~AY RESTO~TIUN 900.00
TURF MO~NG 2834.86
~U MO~ING 4567.97
8302.83
03021 L~TERI, IAU~ L. ~IM~ EXPNXSES 43.35
01922 LYNX P~VEY C~PA~Y SURSLIE8 153.90
SUPPLIES i25.55
279.45
04014 MAILBOXES ETC. SHPVI TO FIU~NCE 309.92
04339 MCGUFFIN, MARK CASH ADVANCE-MCGUNFIN 375.00
01979 MCI NI~LESS SERVICE 86.41
RE,VICE 169.44
SERVICE 71.99
327.84
02241 MCLEOD USA/ONE STOP CC~4UNICATIO~S SERVICE-APRIL 409.73
S~VICE-AREIL 388.42
SERVICE-APRIL 29.87
SERVICR-APRIL 99.56
SENVICE-APRIL 199.11
SERVICE-AREIL 99,55
RERVICE-APRIL 378.31
SERVICE-APRIL 99.85
RERVICR-APRIL 149.33
SERVICE-APRIL 258.84
RERVICE-APRIL 19.64
SERVICE-APRIL 79.64
SERVICE-APRIL 358.40
RERVICE-APRIL 2020.96
SERVICE-APRIL 1981.14
RERVICE-APRIL 1274.30
7906.35
05021 MENk~DS MISC.ITLXS 57.64
00116 NXT~O ~DEk~L CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 061500 730.00
00117 METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 061500 546.00
02010 MICHAELS STORE INC. 10107 MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES 43.32
02011 MICDFLNX MEDICAL CORPO~TIUN MEDICAL SUPPLIES 69.00
02046 MOBILE PRINT INC. T~FFIC STOP REPORT FO~ 301.75
PRINTING 272.00
BUSINESS C4%DS 35.00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 I5:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 6
RELEASE ID :
VILk~GK OF MODI{T PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES REEM JUNE 01 2000 TO JUNE 15 2000
DEPT VENDOR NEX VENDOR NkME INVOICE DESCRiPTION AMOUNT
608.75
02307 MOTOPHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 39.90
03932 NATIONAL NETWORK FOR SOCIAL WORK MANAGERS M~RKRSHIP RENEWAL 85.00
02148 NEOFOST PASTAGH TAPE 37.10
02155 RENTEL CC~URICATIONS SERVICE 241.83
CELLULAR SERV-MCAT 873.99
815.82
02170 NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TREG REGISTRATION FEE 50.00
02189 NORTEMEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES 28122.34
SERVICES 7030.58
35152.92
05002 NORTh%lEST POLICE ACADEMY REGISTRATION FEE 25.00
~ERSHIP REMEl~AL ACADEMY 20.00
48.00
02199 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SUPPLIES 549.65
04140 NOTARY PUBLIC ASSOCIATIO{~ RENEWAL OF NOTARY PUBL 41.00
02204 NOVAK ~ PARKER INC. 1 KITCHEN STOVE 728.95
02228 OAR'TON PAVILLION HSALTHCARE HOME DELIVERED MEALS 2500.00
02238 ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY 24.00
02243 ORION SALTY PRODUCTS SARERT FLARES 800.00
SAFETY FLARES 1637.44
2437.44
02256 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC ADVERTISING 4470.57
02263 PANOPAMIC LANDSCAPE CO SERVICE-HOLIDAY LIGHTS 1213.40
02264 PAPERDIRECT, INC. SUPPLIES 69.92
00407 PATTI, MICHAEL REIME EXPENSES 33.00
05026 PAYFONMANCE CORP. MICT TONER i84.00
00123 PERSCO PAYROLL FOR - 061500 16666.81
00410 PNTERSON, JAMES C. REI~URAR EXPANSES 118.00
02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DENT. SUPPLIES/REIMB 38.80
MISC EXPENSES 10. O0
MISC EAPEXRKS 16.86
~PORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRON JUNE 01 2000 TO JUNE 15 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
MISC EXPENSES 19.46
MISC E~(PENRES 18.67
MISC EAPENSES 10.12
MISC EXPENSES 81.71
MISC EXPENSES 41.99
MISC EXPENSES 69.42
MISC EXPENSES 72.02
379.05
02303 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MISC EAPENSES 2.19
MISC EXPENSES 117.60
MISC EAPENSES 18.64
MISC EXPENSES 22.80
MISC EXPENSES 15.15
MISC EXPENSES 9.19
184.77
02304 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES t53.55
MISC EXPENSES 34.46
MISC EXPENSES 7.64
MISC REPENSES 6.68
MISC EXPENSES 10.00
MIHC EXPENSES 5.40
MISC EXPENSES 84.08
MISC EXPENSES 12.17
MISC EXPENSES 30.73
MISC E~PENSES 39.30
383.85
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 2.98
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 3.19
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 76.73
82.90
00124 POLICE PENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 061500 14901.26
04512 PONTAt{ELLI CONSTRUCTION CO. SE~R REPAIRS 1440.00
04921 POPE, ELIZABETH A. PAYROLL FOR - 061500 923.08
02344 PREISEN ABIF~%L HOSPITAL STRAYS-MAY,2000 300.00
01288 R.A. DORAN & ASSOCIATES REGISTRATION 180.00
02384 RADIO SHACK BATTERIES/BATTERY ROCK TEST 38.15
02393 RAY O'HERAON CO.,INC. RIOT BEI/~ETS 689.70
02396 RAYMARK OFFICE PROD & FUEN OFFICE SUPP 137.51
OFFICE SUPPLIES 57.35
I94.86
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN!500 10:59 PAGE 8
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MEU~T PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRERE&ITED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM JUNE 0i 2000 TO JUNE 15 2000
DE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~ INVOICE DESC~JPTION AMOU~
02408 REID AND ASSOCIATES, JO~ E. PRE-E~PLOTMEN~ TESTING 875.00
02465 ROTARY L~CE CLUE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MLM~E~SEIP-FIGOLAN 183.00
NUXBER DUES 73.00
MEALS 121.00
ROTARY DUES 183.00
560.00
05016 RUNDE, TEE.RANCE & MICNELE RS~L ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 526.00
05000 RYAN AND RYAN LEGAL FERS-TIF PROP 20804.46
04673 SAN BE~ANDINO COONTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS PAYROLL FOR - 061500 211.85
02494 SAVE-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER STRAYS-APRIL,2000 245.00
02515 SC~F~EPRE & SONS L~CEROCN SUPPLIES 400.98
02525 SECRETARY OF STATE VEHICLE FOLLOW-UP 500.00
00125 SEIU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 061500 484.50
02536 S~VENTE~N SPECIALTIES INC. PROMOTIONAL ITS~S/OREN HOUSE 100.00
AANOR DAY CEI~I{ONY 766.00
PRC~OTIOMAL ITD{S/OPEN HOUSE 844.06
1710.06
02545 SIG A~S INC k~4UNITION 123.00
05003 SIGN A RAXA REFUND 25.00
05019 SILL, GREGORY REFO}ID DUP STICKER 54.00
REFUND 54.00
108.00
02559 SIRCNIE FINGER PRIN~ I~EORATOB SUPPLIES 273.45
02563 SKILLPATN SLMINARE REGISTkATION i49.00
05033 ST. AUBIN NURSERIES, INC TREES 2882.00
TREES 7044.00
TREES 4504.00
14430.00
04139 STANARD & ASSOCIATES PRE-SMPLOY~NI TESTING 350.00
SERVICE 350.00
SERVICE 1750.00
2450.00
02619 STAT TEC~OLOGIES, INC. MEDICAL SUF?LIIES 28.00
02632 STERLING CODIFIERS, INC. SUPPLEMENT #3 740.00
'REPORT: APNOARDRET GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 9
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC~
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNUN JUNE 01 2000 TO JUNE t5 2000
DEPT VENDOR NUN VENDOR Nm INVOICE DESCRI~ION AMOUNT
S2639 STIVERS STAFFINO SERVICES DATA ENTRY SERVICES 762.76
DATA ENTRY SERVICES 610.20
1372.96
05027 STOCK, DIANE & DAVID RE/TRAI~SFER TA~ REBATE 864.00
02658 SUBURBAN PRESS PERMIT FILE JACKETS 290.00
LABELS 183.00
473.00
04945 SUN OFFICE [gREITURB FRBIGHT-INV 1972 20.00
02670 SWIDERSKI ELECTRONICS INC. }L~RD~ARB AUDIO JACKS 5100.00
02672 SYNTLv~ FOAMS, INC. DOG LICENSE APPLICATIONS 319.66
REPORT CAVERS 295.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES 329.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES 480.38
OFFICE SUPPLIES 190.30
OFFICE SUPPLIES 192.50
1806.84
02680 TELETRAC, INC. SERVICE 1092.00
02691 TNCMKSUN ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS SERVICE 297.00
SERVICE 180.00
477.00
02698 TJ CONEVERA'S, INC. A~4UNITION 4556.92
04610 TRAVEL PLUS AIRRARB 310.00
02723 TRITON ELECTRONICS, INC. REPAIR 34.60
00127 UNITED WAY PAYROLL FOR - 061500 427.88
00450 VALENTINE, R. PAUL ~PENRES 482.00
02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 211.38
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 061500 17509.47
04314 VILLAGE OF ~OUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 060200 241.48
PAYROLL FOR - 061500 141577.96
PAYROLL FOR - 061500 19304.42
PAYROLL FOR - 061500 12965.69
174089.55
02819 VITAL RBCORD BANC, INC. STAREGE OF 58 ROLLS OF FII/{ 29.00
01220 ~.S DA~LEY & CO. SUPPLIES 613.07
REPORT: APBOARONPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 98 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 10
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LiST OF SILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRON J~NE 01 2000 TO J]~E 15 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMO~INT
02832 WAL-NART STORES, INC. FILM PROCESSING 47.91
k~ULANCE SUPPLIES 27.16
BATTERIES 5.97
81.04
02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT OFFICE SUPPLIES 257.95
02848 ~EILER ARTHUR, INC. TREES 350.00
05001 WILDER, RALPH SOUSA CONCERT PERFOk~. 100.00
05034 WILSON NUREERIES, INC INV 67789/67790/37791/37792 5064.00
TREES 8132.50
TREES 356.00
13552.50
02893 WOLF CAMERA, INC. PHOTO PROCESSING 14.49
PHOTO PROCESSING 5.90
PHOTO PROCESSING 25.29
POLA~{OID SPECTRA TWIN FILM 264.00
309.68
04100 WOLTER, DALE COST SRARE REIM~ 105.00
TOTAL 496224.51
030
01639 A/~ERICAN NATIONA~ Bk~{ TIPPING FEES 73094.12
FIXED COSTS 41597.20
114691.32
02241 MCLEOD USA/ONE STOP CO~~fJNICATIONS SErVICE-APRIL 39.83
02536 SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC. RECYCLING AWARENESS AUPPLIES 593.50
TO~AL 115324.65
050
02167 AN]{OW ROAD CONSTRUCTION STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM 128242.64
TOTA~ 128242.64
O60
05005 CDS OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES LAPTOP CONP~TERS 9025.00
TOTAL 9025.00
07O
01222 DAILY HERALD LEGAL NOTICE 77.70
00335 FOLEY, AP~L B. CASE ADVANCE-MENTOR OUTING 350.00
P~PONT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE ll
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST ON BILLS PRESERTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RNC~ JUNE 01 2000 TO J~NE 15 2000
ONPT VENDOR NBR V~3DOR Nk~E INVOICE ONSCRI~TION ~OONT
05012 NEFRERAN ROOFING SINGLE Fk~ILY REEAB PROGRk~ 7035.00
05014 RID~ST GHN~atIL CONSTRUCTION SINGLE FAS RESAB FROG 6850.00
02052 MORAN, MICHAEL J. ATTORNEY SERVICES 170.50
02659 SUBURBAN PRiMkRV ND£TB COUNCIL APRIL BILLING 708.33
TOTAL 15191.53
05005 CDS OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES C~P~TER SUPPLIES 447.00
LAPTOP COMPUTERS 26507.00
26954.00
01580 HENRICKS~ & CONPA~'Y, INC. CREDIT 99101297 273.00-
INV 219704 2482.50
INV 219898 321.50
2531.00
04272 ION TECHNOLOGIES MS OFFICE 97 PROFESSIONAL 1416.00
01914 LUND INDUSTRIES, !NC. SERVICE 5958.00
TOTAL 36059,00
500
04124 A~IBRECHT RNTERPRISES DS~OLITION 16988.00
04248 BUETTNER, CANDACE AN~, TRUSTEE 1ST tNSTL-NOTE DUE 17166.67
05036 GLORIA J~.N SEH~K~&NOREERV HUECHNR, TRUSTEES 1ST INSTL OF NOTE P~ 17166.66
01791 K-PLUS ENVIROHNf21TAL, INC. SOIL S~PLING 4799.00
TOTAL 56120.33
560
02167 ARNON ROAD CONSTRUCTION STREET RECONSTRACTION PROGRAM+ 74105.!4
TOTAL 74105.i4
590
02929 A & J GRAPHIC CC~9~IJICATIONS POS PRINTING 1025.00
TOTAL I026.00
610
05028 A.R. MO~ILE WASH CLEAN RESENVOIK 2500.00
01780 AMERITECH SERVICE 69.25
02730 BERLAND'S HOUSE OF TOOLS SHOVEI~/SPADES 338.90
01~97 Ct~AS CO~{~ UNIFON~ RE~AL & CLS~NING 544.83
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 18:58 RUN: THURSDAY JIIN!500 10:59 PAGE 12
RELISH ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNV PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FEON J'~NE 01 2000 TO J~NE 15 2000
DEPT VENDOR NEN VENDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
05009 CIOTA, k~LIA L. REFUND 9.69
REFUND 1.02
10.71
01147 CC~4ONWEAtTH EDISON ENERGY CHARGES 648.24
01283 DIXON ENGINEERING INSPECTION SENV 2850.00
01323 EAST JORDAN IRONWORKS INV2090615/2091944/2098513 9960.00
01439 FRIEDMAN EISENNTEIN RAL~ER AND SC~ARTZ, LLP ANN~AL AUDIT-PARTIAL 4500.00
01544 HEN RATER METER SERVICE INV 309/305/297/283/284/'276 7174.25
01427 JOSEPH D. DO.'~:?~L%~ & CO. PARTS 20.90
PARTS 2579.28
2600.18
04999 ~[~%NN, CHERYL REIMB SHOES 54.09
02241 MCREOD USA/ONE STOP CO~JNICATIONS SERVICE-APRIL 1702.12
SENVION-APRIL 2658.13
4360.25
04196 MIEA, NANCY REIMB EXPENSES 99.99
02136 NATIONAL SAKETY COUNCIL ML~BEREHIP RENm~AL 200.00
04560 NO~I~E SE~R & WATER INC. SEWER REPAIR 4420.00
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORRE TREVEL & SUPPLIES 18.12
05018 SAVANNAH ENVIRONMENVAL REGISTRATION 998.00
02536 SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC. PRONOTIONAL IT~S/OFEN HOUSE 658.96
05035 SOUTH, JASON ENI~B SAFETY SHOES 85.00
05020 SUNRISE PANCAKE HOUSE REFUND 329.46
REFUND 34.68
364.14
04838 THIRE MILLENNI~ ASSOC.INC. INV 2105 ADDL PROG 1332.00
INV 2255P 575.00
INV 2255/2288 3549.42
5456.42
02624 TREASURER, STATE OF ILLINOIS ANNUAL WATER TESTING 4110.
02773 U.S. BANK TRUST WATER 130491.00
POWER 9621.
· REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENEPJ%TED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 13
RELEASE ID :
VIL~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PREREN'~ED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~ J~E 01 2000 TO J~NE 15 2000
DE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR N~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
O & M 26200.00
FIXED 94374.00
260686.00
02756 KNITED STATES POSTA~ SERVICE POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS 5000.00
TOTA~ 317707.33
630
02754 UNION PACIFIC RAILROkD I~ND L~SE-MAY 1186.71
TOT~5 1186.7i
660
01169 AERIk5 EQUIPS, INC. STIHL THROTTLE CABLE 14.49
01187 AETNA TRUCK PABTS REPAIR PARTS 585.54
02108 ARLINGTON POWER EQUIPFf2~T SPARK PLUGS/P~P 30.36
01086 CHICAGO TURF & IkRIGATIKN WIPER SWITCH 41.57
01236 DAVE & JIM'S AUTO BODY, INC. ~EEL ALIGNFF~NT P-7 35.00
05006 FINABINER EQUIPMKN~ CO. MAINTENANCE PARTS 996.70
01511 GOODYE%R SERVICE STORES TIRES 526.08
01616 HOSKIN8 CHEVROLET, INC. R~TAINEE 1.58
01872 ~ATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. R~PAIRS 607.39
REPAIRS 424.00
1031.39
01914 LKND INDUSTRIES, INC. CLEVIS KNOB,BOLT, SPACER 22.20
02241 MCLEOD USA/ONE STOP CO~i~NICATIONS SERVICE-APRIL 149.33
01990 MCMASTER-CAAR MISC.SUPPLIES 213.48
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS T~VEL & SUPPLIES 98.83
04461 SCH~LTE SUPPLY MAP ~4P 427.30
02684 TERENCE SUPPLY C~P~NY REpLACEMF2~T PARTS 199.48
04472 TEXOE P~ROLE~ CO GASkHOL 12584.75
05004 VKNIZON WIRELESS SERVICE 45.01
TOTAL 17003.09
670
04579 CKNT~ VEHICLE SYST5~S, INC. SERVICE 2323.50
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENEk%TED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 14
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES EN~ J~NE 01 2000 TO J~]NE 15 2000
DEPT VENDOR RER VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
05007 LAND~RK FOD 2000 FORD VEHICLE 15549.00
05008 RUNNION EQUIPMENT CO. REFURBISH PRENTICE LOADER 8416.16
TOTAL 26288.66
690
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. PNT INS CLAIMS-GRB 40967.20
P~ INS ClAIMS-GAB 11362.30
52329.50
01306 DRUG CARD, INC. PRESC. CARD CLAIMS 13691.94
PRESCRIPTION CARD ClAIMS 10779.90
24471.84
01737 INTEENOVEREMENTAL PER.BEN.COOP LIFE INS 2082.80
~40 INS 50700.71
MED INS 101256.74
APMIN REES 6871.98
LIFE IHS 2082.80
~O ILL 50700.71
mD INS 101256.74
ADMIN FEES 6871.98
321824.46
05038 MIDWEST SPORTS MEDICINE RERVICES-KLEES 196.00
02192 NONTH~ZST CC~UNITY HOSPITAL ETBREO, DOI 5/15/00 364.00
SERVICES-HOENINSON 253.00
617.00
05039 NORTRWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC. KAISER, kALPH 249.00
02852 WERDERITCH, RANDALL REPMB PMESCRIPTION 48.00
TOTAL 399735.80
710
02637 BECKRE, BUR/{EASSOCIATES INC INVESTMENT CONSULTING-POLICE 5000.00
05037 lASALLE BARKNA INV9620000131133/962000131134 300.00
02334 POSTMASTER P.O. BOX RENTAL #2 46.00
TO?AL 5346.00
720
02637 BECRER, BURKE ASSOCIATES tHC INVESTMENT CONSULTING 5000.00
05037 LASALLE BAMKNA INV 9620000131132/962000131138 281.25
TOTAL 5281.25
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN!500 i0:59 PAGE 15
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOTJN'T PROSPEC~
LIST OF BILLS PRESE~EN TO THE BOAt{D OF TRUSTEES F~OM JU~E 01 2000 TO J~NE 15 2000
DEPT VENIX)R NBt{ VF.~DOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOU~
...................................................................................................................................
770
02513 ABERXETBY, J~ET T. F~EX COMP 569.18
01042 ADANCZYK, TED D. FLEX COMP 600.00
02667 BE~N, DAVID 5EX COMP 86.64
02921 SLUE, MICHAEL FLEX COMP 833.36
02949 BROUSSEAU, ANDENW J. FLEX COMP 1428.88
04672 BROWN, SIEVE FLEX COMP 476.50
01167 CONDON, KEVIN J. FLEX COMP 1000.08
01219 DAHLEXRG, JOHN K. FLEX COMP 800.00
04841 EVANS, RALPH FLEX COMP 4309.67
01382 FELTEN, ~%~SARA L FLEX COMP 325.00
01418 FLORY, Jk~S M. FLEX COMP 150.00
01484 GIBSON, ROBERT J. FLEX COMP 18.00
01540 GOENTSR, JkRE8 E. hEX COMP 1195.45
01541 GUTIEENEX, JOLIE M. FLEX COMP 155,44
01557 ~ENAN, LRSTER a. FLEX COMP 463.99
01560 ~SEN, DONALD E. FLEX COMP 1269.18
01625 NU~%%N~, AN~EO~Y FLEX COMP 941.30
01722 INGEBRIGTSEN, JAMES hEX COMP 1000.08
01844 K~UPA, FRANK M. FLEX COMP 61.50
01902 LIVINGSTON, CHARLES E. FLEX COMP 1292.49
01905 LO~, VE".~ W. FLEX COMP 74.01
01942 ~CO~, JOHN J. hEX COMP 83.65
02033 MILER, DAVID L. FLEX COMP 374.23
02206 NO, AK, THOMAS J. FLEX COMP 427.76
02278 RAVLDOK, ROMALD W. FLEX COMP 386.56
02631 0TEPRENSOM, MICNANL R. FLEX COM~ 90.00
02644 8TRA~L, DAVID FLEX COMP 89.00
02729 TREY, ENRIS J.' FLEX COMP 511.50
REPORT: APBOARDRDT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN1500 10:59 PAGE 16
RELi~SE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOU~T PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PP, ESEN~RD TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F~OM J~NE 01 2000 TO J~NE 15 2000
RE?T VENDOR RER VENDOR NANE INVOICE DRSCRIF~ION ANOUNT
02828 WAGNER, JOHN R. FLEX CO~P 163.20
02853 WERDERITCH, RANDALL C. FLEX COMP 618.06
TOTAL 19796.71
790
04324 BANK ONE SAVING8 DONDS-5/18&6/1 1200.00
01719 IMP, F PP~5~I~- JUNE 2000 282.00
04906 RAND~RST CU~ENCY EXCHANGE OVERPAY~NT 36.00
05017 RAPLEY JR., ALBERTO OVERPA~EN~ 5.00
02689 THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COUBT BOND MONEY 2401.00
BOND MONEY 3853.00
BOND MOREY 300.00
J~3 BOND MONEY 2376.00
8930.00
00128 VILLAGE OF M~NT PROSPECT DISBURS~)T~NT 5480.00
04990 WISCOMSIN DEP~MENT OF REVEN]E WI INCOME TAX-~Y 291.38
TOTAL 16194.38
GRAND TOTAL 1740657.73
GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN!500 10:59 PAGE 17
RKLEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
BROW JUNE 01 2000 TO JUNE 18 2000
S~RY BY ~UNU
001 GENERAL FUND 496224.51
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 115324.65
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 128242.64
060 LAW ENFORCEME~ BLOCK GP~N~ 9025.00
078 CO~3NITY DEVELP~T BLOCK GRNT 15191.53
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 36859.00
550 DOWNTO~ REDEVLP~T CONST 56120.33
560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 74105.14
590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1025.00
610 WATER AND SE~ER FUND 317707.33
630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 1186.71
660 VEHICLE 51AI~ENANCE FUND 17003.09
670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 26288.66
690 RISK ~[~NAGEMENT ~3ND 399735.80
710 POLICE PENSION ~UND 5346.00
720 FI~E PENSION FUND 5281.25
770 ~LEXCOWP ESCROW FUNU 19796.71
790 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 16194.38
TOTAL: 1740657.73
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET REVENUE
AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES
January 1 - May 31, 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 5 Months { 41.6% ) Completed
7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
Budget Revenue Su~m-~ary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T~D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
REVEN~E BY CLASSIFICATION
PROPERTY TAXES 7,285 4,624,887 9,752,255 5,127,368 52.6
OTHER TAXES 1,306,868 7,223,105 16,475,226 9,252,121 56.2
LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 408,584 2,014,838 2,987,400 972,562 32.6
INTERGOVERMENT REV. 678,792 3,155,090 8,259,200 5,114,110 61.8
C~L~RGES FOR SERVICE 1,005,168 4,570,921 12,179,620 7,608,699 62.5
FINES AND FORFEITS 32,046 188,015 531,500 343,485 64.6
INVESTMENT INCOME 87,779 2,655,112 4,948,162 2,293,050 46.3
REIMBURSEMENTS 924,291 1,935,969 788,300 -1,147,669 -145.6
OTMER REVENUE 221,085 1,382,740 2,893,955 1,511,215 52.2
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 667,146 5,136,500 4,469,354 87.0
Total All Funds 4,671,898 28,417,823 63,962,118 35,544,295 55.6
06/~2/2000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~5:~:27 Budget Revenue Sunm%ary 7 Months ( 88.3% ) Remaining
01/01/00 - o5/31/oo
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
SSA ~7 WMITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 3,669 361,571 3,156,850 2,795,279 88.5
WATER ;%ND SEWER FU~D 437,333 2,706,213 7,599,200 4,892,987 64.4
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 16,694 87,184 216,900 129,716 59.8
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 92,538 462,987 1,110,392 647,405 58.3
VEHICLE REPI~CEMENT FUND 70,270 454,781 1,082,981 628,200 58.0
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 9,697 52,226 121,733 69,507 57.1
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 302,897 2,334,081 3,415,394 1,081,313 31.7
POLICE PENSION FUND 61,695 1,471,847 2,777,520 1,305,673 47.0
FIRE PENSION FUND 45,102 1,364,376 2,812,560 1,448,184 51.5
BENEFIT TRUST #2 Fl/ND 143 2,122 6,000 3,878 64.6
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 0 0 0 0
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 0 0 0 0
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 69 322 0 -322
SSA ~6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 252 20,336 39,125 18,790 48.0
SSA #7 ~U~ITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Total All Fu/%ds 4,671,898 28,417,823 63,962,118 35,544,295 55.6
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
~:2o~o7 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUMo21 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Stunmary
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
GENERAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 4,992 3,175,684 6,685,955 3,510,271 52.5
41 OTHER TD~XES 907,407 4,266,267 9,954,800 5,688,533 57.1
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 390,637 1,825,979 2,750,500 924,S21 33.6
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 516,609 2,269,251 5,000,800 2,731,549 54.6
44 CHE~RGES FOR SERVICE 49,374 282,596 600,920 318,324 53.0
45 FINES AND FORFEITS 32,046 188,015 531,500 343,485 64.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 21,025 178,769 360,000 181,231 50.3
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 18,413 114,661 275,300 160,639 58.4
48 OTHER REVENUE 17,695 143,331 155,475 12,144 7.8
49 OTNER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL~ENERAL FUND 1,958,198 12,444,553 26,315,250 13,870,697 52.7
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
40 PROPERTY TAXES 1,804 1,141,062 2,419,300 1,278,238 52.8
44 C~%RGES FOR SERVICE 122,965 346,379 791,700 445,321 56.2
46 Ik~VESTMENT INCOME 2,274 31,447 50,000 18,553 37.1
48 OTNER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 127,043 1,518,888 8,261,000 1,742,112 53.4
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 112,183 631,781 1,380,700 748,919 54.2
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,913 17,105 40,000 22,895 57.2
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 899,800 910,237 0 -910,237
TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAN FUND 1,013,896 1,559,123 1,420,700 -138,423 -9.7
LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 4,058 0 -4,058
46 INVESTMEN~C INCOME 26 91 0 -91
TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 26 4,149 0 -4,149
COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GP~MT
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 307,700 307,700 100.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 70 139 0 -139
48 OTHER REVENUE 45,041 86,257 60,000 -26,257 -43.8
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GP-NT 45,111 86,396 367,700 281,804 76.5
ASSET SEIZURE FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
TOTAL ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 0 0
LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 IN~;ESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
15:20:08 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Suaunary
Ol/O /OO - o /3 /oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996 0 0 0 0
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A
40 PROPERTY TAXES 38 23,034 48,000 24,966 52.0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 22 1,148 1,046 -102 -9.8
TOT~-L PUBLIC WORRS FACILTY B&I 1987A 60 24,182 49,046 24,864 50.7
PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B
40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B 0 0 0 0
POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A
40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTALPOLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B
40 PROPERTY TAXES 451 285,107 599,000 313,893 52.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 674 8,863 22,089 13,226 59.9
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B 1,125 293,970 621,089 327,119 52.7
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPM~T B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A
41 OTHER TAXES 389 195,997 340,000 144,003 42.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 239 8,263 15,390 7,127 46.3
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPF/NT B&I 1993A 628 204,260 355,390 151,130 42.5
DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
15:20:08 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMo21 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
Ol/Ol/OO - o5/31/oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B
41 OTHER TAXES 5 2,326 4,000 1,674 41.9
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 20 71 95 24 25.3
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 2S 2,397 4,095 1,698 41.5
DOWNTOWN R~DEVL B & I 1999
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 71 17,120 39,406 22,286 56.6
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 500,000 500,000 100.0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 71 17,120 539,406 522,286 96.8
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL ~&I 199LA 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A
41 OTHER TAXES 15,485 93,020 200,510 107,490 53.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 118 2,731 10,087 7,356 72.9
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL ~&I 1992A 15,603 95,751 210,597 114,546 54.5
REFUNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B
41 OTHER TAXES 20,852 125,257 270,000 144,743 53.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 230 3,678 12,426 8,748 70.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993B 21,082 128,935 282,426 153,491 54.3
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 13,114 78,773 169,800 91,027 53.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 120 1,672 6,370 4,698 73.8
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 15,234 80,445 176,170 95,725 54.3
FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 1S,987 96,031 207,000 110,969 S3.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 181 1,797 6,958 5,161 74.2
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 16,168 97,828 213,958 116,130 54.3
FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 5,020 30,155 65,000 34,845 53.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 96 224 1,024 800 78.1
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 5,116 30,579 66,024 35,645 54.0
06/12/2000 E Months ( 41.6% ) Complet, ed
15:20:08 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM02i Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 175 87,686 152,600 64,914 42.5
46 Ib~;ESTMEHT INCOME 110 1,330 748 -582 -77.8
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 285 89,016 153,348 64,332 42.0
EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 38,229 229,638 495,000 265,362 53.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 596 4,508 7,565 3,057 40.4
TOTAL EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 38,825 234,146 502,565 268,419 53.4
FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 6,000 6,000 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 238,150 238,150 100.0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 0 0 244,150 244,150 100.0
STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A
41 OTHER TAXES 40,048 240,564 510,000 269,436 52.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 388 8,053 28,851 19,798 68.6
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 40,436 249,617 538,851 289,284 53.7
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A
41 OTHER TAXES 8,481 50,943 108,000 57,057 52.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 89 1,868 6,034 4,166 69.0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 8,570 52,811 114,034 61,223 53.7
STREET iMPROVB & I 1998A
41 OTHER TAXES 12,014 72,169 153,000 80,831 52.8
46 I5~VESTMENT INCOME 212 641 741 100 13.5
49 OTHER FINkNCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROVE & I 1998A 12,226 72,810 153,741 80,931 52.6
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A
46 INVESTMENT iNCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 50,000 50,000 380,000 330,000 86.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 909 45,968 45,000 -968 -2.2
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 135,000 135,000 100.0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 512,000 1,024,000 512,000 80.0
06/I2/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
~:20:08 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRBRR03
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Slurmiary
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 50,909 607,968 1,584,000 976,032 61.6
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 266 1,241 0 -1,241
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 266 1,241 0 -1,241
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 892 3,687 0 -3,687
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 892 3,687 0 -3,687
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT ~ONST 1998 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPWNT CONST
41 OTHER TAXES 84 42,733 73,491 30,758 41.9
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 0 0 0 0
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 4,343 22,96I 40,000 17,039 42.6
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 450,000 450,000 100.0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 1,387,500 1,387,500 100.0
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLpMNT CONST 4,427 65,694 1,950,991 1,885,297 96.6
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND
41 OTHER TAXES 228,304 797,133 2,063,600 1,266,467 61.4
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 17,647 187,659 233,000 45,341 19.5
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 11,151 75,326 75,000 -326 -0.4
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 257,102 1,060,118 2,371,600 1,311,482 55.3
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 22 102 0 -102
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 22 102 0 -102
SSA ~7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL SSA %7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
06/12/2000 6 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
15:20:08 7 Months ( 58.3% } Remaini~n~
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMOSi Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Suam%ary
01/01/00 05/3 /00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 200,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 83.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 3,869 21,665 30,000 8,335 27.8
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
49 OTBER FINANCING SOURCES 0 139,906 1,926,850 1,786,944 92.7
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 3,689 361,571 3,186,850 2,795,279 88.5
WATER AND SEWER FUND
41 OTBER TAXES 1,095 722,364 1,545,300 822,936 53.3
44 CH~GES FOR SERVICE 423,804 1,900,170 5,869,900 3,989,730 67.6
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 8,702 65,271 175,000 109,729 62.7
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 3,000 3,000 100.0
48 OTBER REVENq3E 3,732 18,408 6,000 -12,408 -208.8
49 OTBER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL WATER AND SEWER FUND 437,333 2,706,213 7,599,200 4,892,987 64.4
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 300 1,200 3,900 2,700 69.2
44 CFOLRGES FOR SERVICE 15,236 72,330 178,000 105,870 59.4
46 INVESTMENT INCOME t,158 13,654 35,000 21,346 61.0
"48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL PAP~ING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 16,694 87,184 216,900 129,716 59.8
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
44 C~L~RGES FOR SERVICE 92,035 460,161 1,104,392 644,231 58.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 503 2,826 6,000 3,174 52.9
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0
48 OTBER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 92,538 462,987 1,110,392 647,405 58.3
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 68,583 342,909 822,981 480,072 58.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,687 96,632 200,000 103,368 51.7
49 OTBER FINANCING SOURCES 0 15,240 60,000 44,760 74.6
TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 70,270 454,781 1,082,981 628,200 58.0
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 9,478 47,390 113,733 66,343 58.3
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 219 4,836 8,000 3,164 39.6
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
TOTAL COM~UTER REPLACEMENT FUND 9,697 52,226 121,733 69,507 57.1
6
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~20:09 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03
SUM021 Budget Revenue by category within Fund Summary
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
RISK MANAGEMENT FUDD
44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 223,693 1,118,986 2,697,994 1,579,008 58.5
46 iNVESTMENT INCOME 4,130 63,548 140,000 76,454 54.6
47 REIMBURSEMENTS 6,078 911,071 80,000 -851,071 ****.*
48 OTHER REVENUE 68,996 240,478 517,400 276,922 53.5
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 302,897 2,334,081 3,415,394 1,081,318 31.7
POLICE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 14,772 1,001,545 1,720,000 718,455 41.8
48 OTHER REVENUE 46,923 470,302 1,057,520 587,218 55.9
TOT~2~ POLICE PENSION FUND 61,695 1,471,847 2,777,520 1,305,673 47.0
FIRE PENSION FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 6,404 940,412 1,850,000 909,988 49.2
48 OTHER REVENUE 38,698 423,964 962,560 538,596 56.0
TOTAL FIRE PENSION FUND 45,102 1,364,376 2,812,560 1,448,184 51.5
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 143 2,122 6,000 3,878 64.6
TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST 92 FL~ND 143 2,122 6,000 3,878 64.6
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 0 0 0 0
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUDD
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0
48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0
TOTAL ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 0 0 0 0
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 69 322 0 -322
TOTAL SSA #1 PROSPECT MEA/DOWS B&I 69 322 0 -822
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I
41 OTHER TAXES 36 19,531 38,125 18,594 48.8
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 216 804 1,000 196 19.6
TOTAL SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 292 20,585 39,125 18,790 48.0
SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I
41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0
46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 O
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Comple~ed
15:20:09 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRBRR03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUM021 Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary
o~./o~/oo - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unreceived Unreceived
Received Received Budget Balance Percent
TOTAL SSA #7 W~ITE OA/(/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRaRy FUND
49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIBP~RY FL~ND 0 0 4,311,000 4,311,000 100.0
o6~2/2ooo VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT s Months ( 41.6~1 Completed
7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
~5:~7:$9 Budget Expenditure Summary
Ol/01/oo o5/31/oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
EXPENDITURE BY C~ASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES 2,015,856 7,143,141 17,979,196 10,836,055 60.3
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 329,155 2,039,062 4,728,690 2,686,628 56.9
OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 27,312 88,919 312,205 223,286 71.5
PENSION BENEFITS 269,556 1,357,379 3,261,465 1,904,086 58.4
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 958,587 4,375,442 12,441,938 8,066,496 64.8
UTILITIES 36,250 112,486 436,029 323,543 74.2
INSURANCE 288,233 2,332,662 3,408,574 1,075,912 31.6
COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 127,485 451,116 1,298,220 847,104 65.3
OTHER EXPENDITURES 53,414 831,682 1,643,304 811,622 49.4
LAND IMPROVEMENTS 26,025 27,673 190,000 162,327 85.4
BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0
BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 6,020 21,004 143,000 121,996 85.3
OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,601 81,244 334,483 283,239 75.7
MOBILE EQUIPMENT 10,429 243,983 838,800 594,817 70.9
OTHER EQUIPMENT 35,438 173,189 613,468 440,279 71.8
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 0 6,300 803,628 797,328 ' 99.2
INFRASTRUCTURE 355,652 700,568 9,165,939 8,465,371 92.4
BOND PRINCIPAL 67,140 236,546 3,838,966 3,602,420 93.8
INTEREST EXPENSE 401,764 711,075 1,342,268 631,193 47.0
BA~K AND FISCAL FEES 0 300 11,480 11,180 97.4
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 512,000 1,024,000 512,000 50.0
Total All Funds 5,009,917 21,445,771 68,812,653 42,366,882 66.4
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 Months < 41.6~ I CompZeted
Budget Expenditure Suam%ary 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
0~/0~/00 - 0S/3~/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 6,066 6,066 157,634 151,568 96.2
STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 51,150 51,150 102,900 51,750 50.3
STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUATD 74,028 176,889 1,771,653 1,594,794 90.0
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 52,030 52,030 100.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 1,648 13,850 12,202 88.1
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPWNT CONST 36,965 882,911 2,116,000 1,233,089 58.3
STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 199 44,067 2,929,717 2,885,650 98.5
FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 8 0
SSA ~7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 43,399 47,779 3,301,117 3,253,338 98.6
WATER AND SEWER FL~ 556,601 2,327,981 7,998,218 5,670,237 70.9
P~RKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 14,185 68,048 274,551 206,503 75.2
VE~ICLE MAINTENANCE FLrND 99,974 406,208 1,103,331 697,123 63.2
VE~ICLE REPI~CSMENT FU~ 10,429 243,983 838,800 594,817 70.9
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 0 34,112 36,250 2,138 5.9
RISK ~AGEME~T FUNqD 268,930 2,231,152 3,213,743 982,591 30.6
POLICE PENSION FUND 130,445 646,683 1,699,730 1,053,047 62.0
FIRE PENSION FUND 134,576 688,907 1,513,035 824,128 54.5
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 2,893 14,467 34,800 20,333 58t4
SSA #I PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 7,078 7,078 39,155 32,077 81.9
SSA #7 W~ITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Total All FUnds 5,009,917 21,445,771 63,812,653 42,366,882 66.4
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9~08 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Bud~l'et Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROSRAMTOTALS
02 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 22,947 43,464 87,842 44,378 50.5
03 ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS 1,283 5,759 14,760 9,001 61.0
Totals 24,230 49,223 102,602 53,379 52.0
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
90 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,760 12,412 29,130 16,718 57.4
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 376 1,862 4,174 2,312 89.4
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 0 200 200 100.0
54 CONTP, ACTUAL SERVICES 20,770 33,132 58,888 25,756 43.7
88 UTILITIES 74 166 410 244 59.5
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 250 1,651 9,800 8,149 83.2
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
Totals 24,230 49,223 102,602 53,379 52.0
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 24,230 49,223 102,602 53,379 52.0
Totals 24,230 49,223 102,602 53,379 52.0
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~s~9:o8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaini~g
FRRDBR01
SUMO~i Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE MANAGER' S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 4t.6% ) Completed
1~:19:08 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ? Months( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM03i Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
TV SERVICES DIVISION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 TELEVISION SERVICES 19,165 87,964 193,184 105,220 54.5
03 OTHER SERVICES 0 0 5,000 5,000 100.0
Totals 19,165 87,964 198,184 110,220 55.6
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9:o8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT7 Months( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMO31 Department Budget Expenditure Suar~ary
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGPJ~M TOTALS
02 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE 13,426 55,975 137,342 81,367 59.2
03 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 0 8,250 0 -8,350
Totals 13,426 64,325 137,342 73,017 53.2
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 8,606 32,538 76,238 43,700 57.3
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,259 9,821 23,596 13,775 58.4
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 33 198 2,000 1,802 90.1
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 991 18,046 25,958 7,912 30.5
55 UTILITIES 253 580 1,600 1,040 65.0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,284 3,162 7,950 4,788 60.2
Totals 13,426 64,325 137,342 73,017 53.2
SOURCE OF F~S
001 GENERAL FUND 13,426 64,325 137,342 73,017 53.2
Totals 13,426 64,325 137,342 73,017 53.2
06/12/2000 S Months { 41.6% ) Completed
~s'~9:08 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT v Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM0Sl Department Budget Expenditure Stum~ary
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~s:~9~08 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remalni=g
FRRDBR01
Depar~er~t Budget Expenditure Summary
o~/o~/oo o5/3~/oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9:08 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remainin~
FRRDBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Sununary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
04 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 945 5,333 18,169 12,836 70.6
05 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 7,355 I2,832 96,155 83,323 86.7
06 ACCESSIBLTY & NEIGHBPd{D IMPRV 0 0 50,000 50,000 100.0
07 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHAB 29,305 43,820 126,545 82,725 65.4
Totals 37,605 61,985 290,869 228,884 78.7
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 752 2,746 11,023 8,277 75.1
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 107 1,658 2,546 888 34.9
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 72 608 1,000 392 39.2
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,369 13,130 98,455 85,325 86.7
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 23 1,300 1,277 98.2
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 29,305 43,820 126,545 82,725 65.4
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 50,000 50,000 100.0
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 0 0
72 INTEREST EXPENSE 0 0 0 0
Totals 37,605 61,985 290,869 228,884 78.7
SOURCE OF FUNDS
070 COMMUNITY DEVELPMMT BLOCK GRNT 37,605 61,985 290,869 228,884 78.7
Totals 37,605 61,985 290,869 228,884 78.7
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~s:19:o8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remainihg
FRRDBR01
SUMo3~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
HUMAN SERVICES Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~E~9:09 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( S8.3~ 1 Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Depart-merit Budget Expenditure Su.n-a'aary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
POLICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~8~9~09 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months I 88.8~ I Remainl~
FRRDBR01
SUMO81 Department Budget Expenditure Summary
o~/ol/oo 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
FIRE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP, AM TOTALS
01 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 44,680 574,882 1,439,697 864,815 60.1
02 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 515,502 1,913,188 4,745,927 2,832,739 59.7
03 FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY 411 411 15,135 14,724 97.3
04 FIRE PREVENTION 44,830 150,903 403,012 252,109 62.6
05 FIRE COMMUNICATIONS 10,392 23,174 47,605 24,431 51.3
06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 52,035 174,304 399,396 225,092 56.4
07 EMERGENCY PREPARDENESS PRGM 0 978 16,010 15,032 93.9
08 PAID-ON-CALL PROGRAM 2,787 8,057 29,008 20,951 72.2
Totals 670,637 2,845,897 7,095,790 4,249,893 59.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 551,494 1,987,656 5,075,796 3,088,140 60.8
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 66,528 599,588 1,338,802 739,214 55.2
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 12,758 26,753 109,250 82,497 75.5
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,272 165,564 390,442 224,878 57.6
55 UTILITIES 8,688 19,878 33,080 13,202 39.9
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 8,302 27,945 91,475 63,530 69.5
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 6,371 8,100 1,729 21.3
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 2,595 12,142 48,845 36,703 75.1
Totals 670,637 2,845,897 7,095,790 4,249,893 59.9
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.8% ) Completed
~:~9:09 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ~ Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Bud~l'et Expenditure Su.mmary
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~s:~9:o9 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMo31 Department Budget Expenditure Su_m~ary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/BLDGS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~9:09 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Sunanary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTR¥/GRNDS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 FORESTRY DIVISION ADMIN 16,384 60,140 162,167 102,027 62.9
02 MAINTENANCE OF GROUND 27,082 78,930 297,309 218,379 73.5
03 FORESTRY PROGRAM 46,731 175,783 631,257 455,474 72.2
04 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION 4,122 4,749 48,599 43,850 90.2
Totals 94,319 319,602 1,139,332 819,730 71.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 62,420 203,574 580,864 377,290 65.0
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 15,293 58,796 145,568 86,772 59.6
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 13 937 1,240 303 24.4
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,616 48,911 362,270 313,359 86.5
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 3,977 7,384 37,960 30,576 80.5
66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 11,430 11,430 100.0
Totals 94,319 319,602 1,139,332 819,730 71.9
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 94,319 319,602 1,129,432 809,830 71.7
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 0 0 9,900 9,900 100.0
Totals 94,319 319,602 1,139,382 819,730 71.9
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41,6% ) Completed
~s:~9:o~ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FRRDBR01
SUMO~ Department Budget Expenditure Sun~%ary
ol/o~/oo - 05/3~/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9:09 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remainin9
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Depart-merit Budget Expenditure Summary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEWER Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 WATER & SEWER DIVISION ADMIN 110,245 432,944 1,321,695 888,751 67.2
02 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 5,081 18,744 85,438 66,694 78.1
03 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 2,241 3,594 78,023 74,429 95.4
04 WATER SUPPLY MAINT & REPAIR 34,057 126,122 616,811 490,689 79.6
05 WATER DISTRBT MAINT & REPAIR 36,552 170,833 640,173 469,340 73.3
06 WATER VALVE/HYDRNT MAINT & REP 34,856 71,207 294,907 223,700 75.9
07 WATER METER MAINT & REPL 27,237 75,741 278,926 203,185 72.8
08 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 42,737 213,683 512,842 299,159 58.3
09 SANITARY SEWER MAINT & REPAIR 23,490 83,722 344,395 260,673 75.7
10 WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROV 13,900 30,185 831,028 800,843 96.4
12 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER SUPPLY 226,205 1,101,206 2,993,980 1,892,774 63.2
Totals 556,601 2,327,981 7,998,218 5,670,237 70.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 125,449 444,433 1,297,037 852,604 65.7
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 33,467 144,270 374,933 230,663 61.5
52 OTNER EMPLOYEE COSTS 3,248 9,418 24,755 15,337 62.0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 331,452 1,554,897 4,731,017 3,176,120 67.1
55 UTILITIES 12,570 28,114 133,180 105,066 78.9
56 INSURANCE 7,265 36,316 87,171 50,855 58.3
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 26,907 93,966 240,080 186,114 77.5
59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 13,246 13,246 28,017 14,771 52.7
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 8,978 7,900 -1,078 -13.6
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 2,997 28,043 161,600 133,557 82.6
68 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 0 6,300 803,628 797,328 99.2
71 BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 108,900 108,900 100.0
Totals 556,601 2,327,981 7,998,218 5,670,237 70.9
SOURCE OF FUNDS
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 0 0 0 0
580 SSA #7 W~ITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
610 WATER AND SEWER FUND 556,601 2,327,981 7,998,218 5,670,237 70.9
Totals 586,601 2,327,981 7,998,218 5,670,237 70.9
06/12/2000 8 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~5:~9:09 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Mo~ths l 88~3~) Remalni~
FRRDBR01
SUM03~ Department Budget Expenditure Summary
o /o /oo os/3 /oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGR~ TOTALS
01 REFUSE DISPOSAL PROGRAM 281,885 1,254,335 3,228,956 1,974,621 61.2
Totals 281,885 1,254,335 3,228,956 1,974,621 61.2
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,303 22,176 65,687 43,511 66.2
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,663 6,986 18,661 11,675 62.6
52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 150 880 730 83.0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 272,100 1,222,140 3,134,783 1,912,643 61.0
55 UTILITIES 95 219 464 245 52.8
86 INSUR3~NCE 198 995 2,381 1,386 58.2
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 1,526 1,669 6,100 4,431 72.6
Totals 281,885 1,254,338 3,228,956 1,974,621 61.2
SOURCE OF FUNDS
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 281,885 1,254,335 3,228,956 1,974,621 61.2
Totals 281,885 1,254,335 3,228,956 1,974,621 61.2
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9:~o VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT v Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMO~ Department Budget Expenditure Summnary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur Mo Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
PUBLIC WORKS - VE~{ICLE MAINT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9:~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Mont~s ( 58.3~1 Eemalni'~g
FRRDBR01
SUMo81 Department Budget Expenditure Sununary
ol/o~/oo o5/3~/oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
02 COMMUNITY GROUPS & MISC 17,869 50,255 91,900 41,645 45.3
03 4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS,ETC 2,880 15,643 87,579 71,936 82.1
04 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 52 399 67,157 66,758 99.4
08 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 231 1,142 2,546 1,404 55.1
Totals 21,032 67,439 249,182 181,743 72.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 153 767 30,079 29,312 97.5
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 65 323 4,823 4,500 93.3
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,749 64,038 181,280 117,242 64.7
55 UTILITIES 0 0 1,150 1,150 100.0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 2,211 21,850 19,639 89.9
59 OTNER EXPENDITURES 0 100 10,000 9,900 99.0
Totals 21,032 67,439 249,182 181,743 72.9
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 21,032 67,439 249,182 181,743 72.9
Totals 21,032 67,439 249,182 181,743 72.9
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~3:~9:~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUM021 Department Budget Expenditure Sthi-~Lary
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGP~ TOTALS
01 VILLAGE IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIP 35,866 138,697 629,533 490,836 78.0
02 CO~SV/3NITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 38,162 39,810 1,065,000 1,025,t90 96.3
03 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 36,965 882,911 2,115,000 1,232,089 58.3
04 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 43,399 47,779 3,301,117 3,253,338 98.6
06 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 287,444 634,192 4,144,237 3,510,045 84.7
07 POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONST 0 0 0 0
09 MOTOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 10,429 243,983 838,800 594,817 70.9
10 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 0 34,112 36,250 2,138 5.9
11 CAPITAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 452,265 2,021,484 12,129,937 10,108,453 83.3
EXPF/~DITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,063 84,001 217,778 133,777 61.4
89 OTHER EXPENDITL~ES 10,863 774,516 1,478,742 704,226 47.6
62 I~ IMPROVEMENTS 26,025 27,673 190,000 162,327 85.4
63 BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0
64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 6,020 21,004 93,000 71,996 77.4
65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 43,799 267,750 223,951 83.6
66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 10,429 243,983 838,800 594,817 70.9
67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 29,846 108,006 305,033 197,027 64.6
69 INFP~STRUCT~/RE 382,019 718,502 8,738,834 8,020,332 91.8
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 452,265 2,021,484 12,129,937 10,108,483 83.3
SO~RCE OF FI~gDS
001 GENERAL FUND 0 0 0 0
050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FI~NqD 287,248 590,125 1,071,520 481,395 44.9
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK G~3LNT 0 0 0 0
070 COF~4UNITY DEVELPPS~T BI~DCK G~/TT 0 0 0 0
080 ASSET SEIZURE FL~D 0 0 0 0
500 STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 0 0 0
510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FL~ 74,028 176,859 1,771,653 1,594,794 90.0
520 POLICE & FIRE BL4)G CONST FL~TD 0 0 52,030 52,030 100.0
530 CAPITA]5 IMPROVEMENT CONST FLR~D 0 1,648 13,850 12,202 88.1
540 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0
550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLP~qT CONST 36,965 882,911 2,115,000 1,232,089 58.3
560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 199 44,067 2,929,717 2,885,650 98.5
570 FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0
580 SSA ~7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0
590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 43,389 47,779 3,301,117 3,253,338 98.6
630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FU~ 0 0 0 0
670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FNND 10,429 243,983 838,800 594,817 70.9
680 COMPLFfER REPLACEMENT FUND 0 34,112 36,250 2,138 5.9
690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 0 0 0 0
Totals 452,265 2,021,484 12,129,937 10,108,453 83.3
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% } Completed
~s;~9:~o VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
SUMO3I Department Budget Expenditure'Summary
01/01/00 - o5/31/oo
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
DEBT SERVICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRA~ TOTALS
02 DEBT SERVICE - PROPERTY TAXES 71,848 196,842 703,785 506,943 72.0
03 DEBT SERVICE - TAX INCREMENT 66,606 232,350 1,674,001 1,441,651 86.1
04 DEBT SERVICE - B/R SALES TAX 1 207,288 395,889 1,788,085 1,392,526 77.9
05 DEBT SERVICE - HIE SALES TAX 2 116,092 116,092 878,788 762,696 86.8
06 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA B & I 7,078 7,078 39,185 32,077 81.9
Totals 468,904 947,921 5,083,814 4,135,893 81.4
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
71 BOND PRINCIPAL 67,140 236,846 3,730,066 3,493,520 93.7
72 INTEREST EXPENSE 401,764 711,075 1,342,268 631,193 47.0
73 BANK AND FISCAL FEES 0 300 11,480 11,180 97.4
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0
Totals 468,904 947,921 5,083,814 4,135,893 81.4
SOURCE OF FUNDS
140 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 0 125,000 47,000 -78,000 -166.0
150 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B 0 0 0 0
160 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
170 REFUND 87B & 9lA B&I 1993B 71,842 71,842 656,785 584,943 89.1
240 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 0 0 0 0
290 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 29,884 29,584 410,167 380,583 92.8
260 DORNTO~q~ REDEVLOPNNT B&I 1994B 0 0 0 0
270 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 8,806 8,806 143,514 134,708 93.9
280 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1998B 2,044 2,044 4,588 2,544 55.4
290 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & I 1999 0 165,744 962,388 796,644 82.8
300 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0
310 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 8,775 8,775 343,200 334,425 97.4
320 REFWNDING FLOOD 9lA B&I 1993B 33,886 38,886 307,502 273,616 89.0
330 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 17,830 17,830 186,160 168,330 90.4
340 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 26,623 26,623 213,748 187,125 87.5
350 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 9,054 9,084 63,710 54,656 85.8
360 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 26,172 28,172 153,844 127,172 82.9
380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 111,118 299,391 613,227 313,836 51.2
390 FLOOD CONTROL 2000 B & I 0 0 60,538 60,538 100.0
410 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 58,876 58,876 618,254 559,378 90.5
420 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 6,066 6,066 157,634 151,568 96.2
430 STREET IMPROVB & I 1998A 51,150 51,150 102,900 51,750 50.3
810 SSA ~1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0
830 SSA ~6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 7,078 7,078 39,155 32,077 81.9
840 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B & I 0 0 0 0
Totals 468,904 947,921 5,083,814 4,135,893 81.4
2O
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9:~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remaining
FRRDBR01
Depart.merit Budget Expenditure Su.mmar~
01/01/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
RETIREE PENSIONS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
06/12/2000 $ Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~5:19~o VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT * Months ( 58.3% ) Remainimg
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Summary
0~/0~/00 - 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
RISK MANAGEMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
22
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~:~9:~0 VILLAGE v-~ MOUNT PROSPECT 7 Months ( 58.3% ) Remainin9
FRRDBR01
SUM031 Department Budget Expenditure Stumnary
01/01/00 05/31/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
NON-DEPARTMENTAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
PROGRAM TOTALS
01 CONTINGENCIES 31,574 543,574 1,024,000 480,426 46.9
Totals 31,574 543,574 1,024,000 480,426 46.9
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
50 PERSONAL SERVICES 31,574 31,574 0 -31,574
51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
53 PENSION BENEFITS 0 0 0 0
54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0
57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0
59 OTBER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0
80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 512,000 1,024,000 512,000 50.0
Totals 31,574 543,574 1,024,000 480,426 46.9
SOURCE OF FUNDS
001 GENERAL FUND 31,574 543,574 1,024,000 480,426 46.9
Totals 31,574 543,574 1,024,000 480,426 46.9
23
06/12/2000 5 Months ( 41.6% ) Completed
~s:~:~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT? Months ( 58.3% ) Remaini~
FRRDBR01
Department Budget Expenditure Summary
oz/o~/oo 05/3~/00
Cur MO Y-T-D 2000 Unexpended Unexpended
MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent
24
VWL
5122/00
5/31/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 507 SOUTH WILLE STREET
WHEREAS, Kevin and Laurie Duffy (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed a
petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 507 South Wille Street
(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows:
Lot 1, Duffy's Resubdivision of Lot 4 and the north ~ of Lot 5 in Block 7 in
Prospect Park Subdivision Number 1, being a subdivision of the W~ of the
north 60 reds of the SW¼ of Section 12, Township 41, North, Range 11, East
of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation to construct a 672 square-foot, two-car
detached garage; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of
ZBA Case No. 10-00 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect
on the 27~ day of April, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the
Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 10th day of April, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the
request for a Variation from Section 14.306.B.1 of Chapter 14 (Zoning) for the Subject
Property at their regular meeting on April 27,2000, said request being the subject of ZBA
10-2000, and voted 3-2 in support of the Petitioners' request; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Page 2/2
507 S. Wille Street
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant, by a vote of 5-2 at their regular meeting of May 16, 2000, a variation, as
provided in Section 14.203.C.6 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of a 672
square foot, two-car detached garage, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Conmmnity Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: MAY 31, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE 6, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA, 18-2000 - 1610 ALGONQUIN ROAD
MAP AMENDMENT FROM R4 MULT~LE FAMILY P~SIDENCE TO B3 COMMUNITY
BUSINESS AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT ESTABLISHMENT OF A
STAND-ALONE PARKiNG LOT.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transrmts their recommendahon to approve Case ZBA-18-2000, a request for a Map
Amendment from R4 Multi-family Development to B3 Community business and a Conditional Use to perrmt the
establishment of a stand-alone parking lot.
The subject property was formerly developed with a multiple family residential development in the R4 zoning district.
United Air Lines is proposing a building addition to their corporate headquarters (in unincorporated Cook County),
which is adjacent to the subject property. The proposed addition will increase the parking needed to serve the office
complex and will also eliminate some existing parking on the property. The property is no longer a multi-family
development and is completely surrounded by commercial, industrial, and office uses. The proposed B3 zoning
district is appropriate for the location. The B3 district lists stand-alone parking lots as Conditional Uses. The
proposed facility is an appropriate use in the district.
The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the map amendment and a conditional use for
Case No. ZBA-18-2000 at 1610 Algonquin Road. The Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use.
William J. Cooney Jr., AICP
/JP
H:\GENXPLNGkZBAXZBA 2000MM EJ MemoskZBA4)7-2000 (CVS) mej memo.dec
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE SURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNI~)
DATE: MAY 19, 2000
HEARING DATE: MAY 25, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-18-2000, REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF A STAND-ALONE PARKING LOT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Eva Stevens for
United Air Lines
1600 Algonquin Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Property Owner
Property Owner: United Air Lines
1600 Algonquin Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Location: 1610 Algonquin Road
Lot Size: 5.0 Acres
Existing Zoning: R4 Multiple Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Vacant.
Requested Action: Petitioner is seeking a Map Amendment from R4 Multiple Family Residence to 133
Community 13usiness Conditional Use approval to permit establishment of a stand-alone
parking lot.
BACKGROUND
Proposal
The subject property consists of three parcels with a total area of five acres. The property was formerly developed
with a multiple family residential development in the R4 zoning district. United Air Lines is proposing a building
addition to their corporate headquarters, which is adjacent to the subject property. The corporate headquarters building
is located in unincorporated Cook County and has been the subject of numerous annexation discussions with the
Village. The proposed addition will increase the parking needed to serve the office complex and will also eliminate
some existing parking on the property. The applicant proposes to construct a 519-space stan/i-alone parking lot to
allow for sufficient parking for the adjacent office use and associated landscape improvements.
ZBA 18-2000 United Air Lines - Rezomng and Conditional Use
Meeting of May 25. 2000
Page 2
Review and Approval Process
The property's current zoning is R4 Multiple Family Residence. To accommodate the proposed use, the property must
be rezoned to a commercial zoning district and the applicant has requested B3 Community Business. A stand-alone
parking lot is listed as a Conditional Use in the B3 district. The applicant has requested a Map Amendment to B3 and a
Conditional Use.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Map Amendment and Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of
survey, site plan, and landscape plan and visited the site.
Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning
The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject parcels for medium-density residential uses, in keeping with
the former development of the site. However, the land use designations on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use
Map are advisory in nature and may be adjusted to react to changing cimumstances. As the property is no longer a
multi-family development and is completely surrounded by commercial, industrial, and office uses, the proposed B3
zoning district is appropriate for the location. The B3 district lists stand-alOne parking lots as Conditional Uses. The
proposed facility is an appropriate use in the district.
ANALYSIS
Parking Lot Design
The proposed facility is a 519-space parking lot that would serve the adjacent office complex. The lot is designed with
24' wide driveways throughout and 18' X 8'6" perpendicular spaces. Zoning Code Section 14.2216 permits the 8'6"
wide spaces for office uses with use of parking spaces by principally long-term users. The lot is cormected to existing
parking lots on the site by two 24' driveways that generally align with driveways in those existing lots. The design of
the parking lot meets the requirements of Article 23 Off Street Parking and Loading of the Zoning Code. The
proposed off-site parking facility is owned by United Air Lines and is within 500' of the property that it serves as
required by Zoning Code Section 14.2206.
No handicap spaces are shown in the proposed lot. According to Zoning Code Seotion 14.2211, 11 handicap spaces
would be required. As the proposed lot is remote from the existing buildings, providing handicap spaces in the lot
would be inappropriate. However, the applicant must make provision for the 11 additional handicap spaces in existing
parking lots at locations with the shortest accessible rout to building entrances.
Engineering Division Review
The Engineering Division has reviewed the requested Conditional Use and has noted the following Development Code
requirements that apply to the subject property.
The site currently consists of three separate parcels and the proposed development wilt cross those
existing property lines. A PIat of Consolidation to create a single zoning lot will be required prior
to issuance of a building permit.
Q The site currently has three curb cuts that serviced the former development on the parcels. As those
curb cuts will not be used for the proposed development, elimination of those curb cuts and
restoration of grass in those areas will be required. Illinois Department of Transportation ([DOT)
permitting will be required for this work.
r~ Parkway trees are required at a spacing of 40' in the right-of-way adjacent to the site. The site has
547' of frontage on Algonquin Road, which will require 14 street trees for the property. Three
parkway trees are existing. Payment for an additional 11 trees will be required at the time of
building permit issuance.
ZBA 18-2000 United Air Lines - Rezorung and Conditional Use
Meeting of May 25. 2000
Page 3
rn Streetlights will be required for the Algonquin Road right-of-way adjacent to the site. As the
Algonquin Road ROW is under IDOT jurisdiction, the property owner may enter into a covenant
agreeing to fund installation of lights adjacent to their property when IDOT installs lights in this
area.
The site was originally a multiple-family residential development. When United Airlines acquired
the properties, the multiple-family buildings ,,,.'ere leveled. However, the infrastructure installed for
the development remains. The water main existing on the property is no longer needed, and must
be abandoned and capped at the mains in Dempster Street and Algonquin Road. The water main
should also then be extended in Algonquin Road along the property (approximately 250') to
complete the loop. Similarly, the existing sanitary sewer must be abandoned and plugged at the
property line.
rn The existing easements associated with the utilities to be abandoned must be vacated.
tn The plan shows access to the property from adjacent parcels instead of Algonquin Road.
Consequently, a cross-access agreement should be recorded.
Additional requirements may be identified following a review of engineering plans for the property. Fulfilling any
such Development Code requirements will be required prior to issuance of a building permit.
Landscaping
The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the proposed parking lot. The lot contains 144,500 square feet of
pavement area, requiring 7,225 square feet of interior landscape area. The lot contains 22 landscape islands with 7,361
total square feet of landscape area. A 10' perimeter landscape buffer is required and is provided along the north, east,
and west property lines. Adjacent to Algonquin Road, along the west half of the property, a bermed perimeter buffer
with a minimum width of 30' is provided. Along the east half of the property's Algonquin Road frontage, the buffer
consists of a drainage retention area that is surrounded by additional plantings. Landscape materials in the form of
new evergreens, ornamental trees, shrubs, and sod are proposed in the perimeter buffer area. Ground covers and shade
trees are provided in all landscape islands interior to the parking lot.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Map Amendment Standards
The standards for Map Amendments are listed in Section 14.203.D.8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance. When a Map
Amendment is proposed, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in
each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters:
compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area of the
property in question;
tn the compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning
classification;
ca the suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning
classifications;
o consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, and the
objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the village
The subject property is located along a principal arterial road between an existing commercial use and the office
complex that the proposed parking lot would serve. Properties across Algonquin Road from the subject property are
developed with a mix of commercial and industrial uses. The proposed B3 zoning district and tl3e proposed use of the
site wilt be compatible with surrounding non-residential land uses and zoning districts. The proposed landscaping of
the subject property would significantly improve the appearance of one of the Village's major arterial roadways, as
required by Village Identity Objective 3 of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zoning district and use of the
property can, therefore, be considered to be consistent with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
BA 18-2000 United Air Lines - Rezomng and Conditional Use
Meeting of May 25, 2000
Page 4
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.$ of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to:
The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort
or general welfare;
The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
[] Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize
congestion on Village streets~ and
[] Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code,
and other Village Ordinances.
The proposed Conditional Use consists ora new, well-landscaped parking lot on a vacant property. The site is located
in a well established commercial and industrial area, containing a mix of commercial, industrial, and corporate office
land uses. The lot will be of an appropriate intensity for that commercial and industrial area. The proposed
development would have no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed
Conditional Use will be in compliance will the Comprehensive Plan and with all Zoning Ordinance requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Map Amendments
in Section 14.203.D.8.a and Conditional Use Standards in Section 14.203.F.g. Therefore, Staffrecommends approval
of the proposed Map Amendment and Conditional Use with the following conditions:
1. Development of the site in general conformance with the submitted site plan prepared by Skidmore, Owings &
Merrill, dated March 30, 2000.
2. Development of the site in general conformance with the submitted landscape plan prepared by Wolff,
Clements and Associates, dated March 30, 2000.
3. Provide eleven (11) additional handicap accessible parldng spaces in the closest accessible locations within the
existing parking lot on the office complex property or provide documentation that sufficient handicap spaces
exist in existing lots.
4. Submit final engineering plans for the site in general conformance with the submitted site plan prepared by
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, dated March 30, 2000 and meeting all requirements of the Development Code.
5. Provide Development Code required right-of-way improvements for the entire frontage of the three parcels.
I Concur,
Director of Community Development
H:\GEN~P LNG~ZBA~ZBA 2000XStaff MemosXZBA- 18-2000(United).d~c
Commonwealth Edison Electrical Easement
,,~, ~ //
~,,,
/}' ",, --~"--// /"// I~ ! Z"~
Road ~ /~' ~ ~ ~
Redwood Dr,
-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-18-2000 Hearing Date: Ma) 25. 2000
PETITIONER: United Airlines. Inc.
1600 W. Algonquin Rd.
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1610 W. Algonquin Rd.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 2000 DAILYHERALD
REQUEST: Map Amendmem from R4 Multi-familyy Development to B3 Communtt~
business and Conditional approval to permit the establishment of a stand-
alone parking lot.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek. Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins. Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Langdon Neal
Jerome Siegan
Michael Sutton
Ted Wolff
Steve Hubbard
Shaylyn Mills
Michael Karcich
Chuck Minor
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 8:20. after hearing three other cases. Ms. Juracek
introduced Case ZBA-18-2000, a request for a Map Amendment from R4 Multi-family Development to B3
Community business, a Conditional Use, and Variations as may be required by the plan submitted, to permil the
establishment of a stand-alone parking lot.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices
sent to property owners within 250' of the subject property, and a sign placed on the property. He stated that the
subject property consists of three R4 zoned parcels with a total area of five acres that formerly contained a multiple
family residential development. He informed the ZBA that United Air Lines is building an addition to their corporate
headquarters complex, which is adjacent to the property in unincorporated Cook County and has been the subject of
numerous annexation discussions with the Village. He added that the addition will increase the parking needed to
serve the complex and will also eliminate some existing parking spaces and that the applicant proposes to construct a
519-space stand-alone parking lot to allow for sufficient parking for the complex.
Mr. Perkins stated that to accommodate the proposed use, the property must be rezoned to B3 Community Business
and that a stand-alone parking lot is listed as a Condkional Use in the B3 district. He then described the property in
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA- 18-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
terms of the Village's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. He stated that the land use designations are advisory and
may be adjusted to react to changing circumstances and that, as the property is no longer a multi-family development
and is completely surrounded by commercial, industrial, and office uses, the proposed B3 zoning district is appropriate
for the location.
Mr. Perkins described the proposed facility and outlined how the design of the parking lot meets Zoning Code
requirements. He stated that no handicap spaces are shown in the proposed tot, but that the Zoning Code requires 11
handicap spaces. He added that the proposed lot is remote from buildings, so providing handicap spaces in the lot
would be inappropriate. He suggested that the applicant should provide for 11 additional handicap spaces in existing
lots at locations with the shortest accessible routes to entrances:
Mr. Perkins described the submitted landscape plan for the parking tot and stated that the proposed plan meets all
Zoning Code landscape requirements.
Mr. Perkins then discussed the proposal in terms of Zoning Code Standards for Map Amendments and Conditional
Uses. Based on positive findings regarding those standards, he gave Staff's recommendation of approval of the
proposed Map Amendment and Conditional Use with the conditions identified in the staff report.
Ms. Juracek confirmed with Mr. Perkins that the Map Amendment does not go with the Conditional Use, that it is a
permanent Map Amendment regardless of the use of the property. Mr. Perkins said that was correct, the property
would be hereafter zoned B3.
Langdon Neal was sworn in and testified that United will be consolidating the three parcels, which total five acres of
currently vacant and undeveloped property within the United Airlines campus complex. The plan will allow for 519
parking spaces, associated landscaping, with lighting and striping in conformanc~ with Village Code and all
specifications of the Village. This will allow United Airlines to increase their overall parking capacity in their world
headquarters and allow for additional expansion in the campus for the proposed office use, which is located in
unincorporated Cook County.
Ms. Juracek asked if Mr. Neal was amenable to staffs condition to provide eleven handicapped spaces. Mr. Neal
responded yes, United agreed with that and all other conditions recommended by staff.
Mr. Floros asked about United's expansion plans. He said he had read that United was moving corporate headquarters
to downtown Chicago. Mr. Neal said he would have Mr. Herb Gardner address that question.
Herb Gardner, Director of Public Affairs for United Airlines in the midwest, was sworn in and testified United is
erecting a new building at their existing 140,000 square foot office complex. It will be to the west of their north
building. It is their new Operations Control Center, which is the heart of the airline. It is an operation that is staffed
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks of the year. They are required to have staff in the dispatch center anytime an
airplane takes-off anywhere around the world. It is being built as a stand-alone facility and will eliminate some of
their existing parking spaces.
Mr. Floros asked about their plans to annex to Mount Prospect. Mr. Gardner said he could not address that question at
this time. They would be discussing those plans in the future.
Ms. Juracek stated she had toured the facility twenty years ago and it was very impressive at that time. She asked
about security and lighting of the facility.
Mr. Gardner said the entire complex is fenced and locked; The only entry is from the Linneman Road entrance. It is
well lighted and employees can request security assistance in getting to their cars.
Richard Rogers asked about trees that are in the parking areas. He said he thought several 4-12 inch honey locust and
hawthorne trees could be saved just by making some changes to the parking islands.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-18-2000
Arlene Juracek. Chairperson Page 3
Ted Wolff, Wolff and Clements. was sworn in and testified the trees which were slated for removal consisted of field
grown trees, not nursery stock, and more ora type inappropnam for parking lots. He said they are going ro atxempr to
save many of the trees but cannot guarantee their survival. While 37 trees will be removed 136 new trees are being
proposed for a net gain of 99 trees.
Richard Rogers said he did applaud their efforts but thought that moving the islands to the east might preserve more
trees. Langdon Neal said they would take another look and do their best to preserve the trees.
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval for Case ZBA-18-2000. a request for a Map Amendment from R4
Multi-family Development to B3 Community business, a Conditional Use. and Variations as may be required b.x the
plan submitted, to permit the establishment of a stand-alone parking lot. Richard Rogers seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers. and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:48 p.m., after hearing another case, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. The
motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Plhnning Secretar5
Michael Blue
Community Development Deputy Director
M0000079
. RAINELL RAINS
FRANCIN£ D. LYNCH
GRADY B. MURDOCK. JR. SUITE 17oo
^.pRE., ~.^.~, June 8, 2000
Honorable Gerald L. Farley
Mayor - Village of Mt. Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056-3266
RE: UNITED AIRLINES - 1200 ALGONQUIN ROAD/
ZONING AND USE APPLICATIONS
Dear Mayor Fadey:
On behalf of United Airlines, Inc., applicant under ZBA18-2000 for a map
amendment and conditional use which was before the Village Board for concurrence on
June 6, 2000, and is currently scheduled for a first reading at the Village Board Meeting
on June 20, 2000, we hereby request that the Village Board waive the second reading of
this matter and consider final approval of these applications on June 20, 2000.
Your consideration of this matter is appreciated.
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter, please do not hesitate
contact the undersigned or Langdon D. Neal.
V~/truly yours,
JAS/ck J~rome A. Siegan
cc: Michael E. Janosis
/
Village Manager
$:[clientstUnitedtLtr~Farle¥-l.wpd
VWL
6/13/00
6/15/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
WITH RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
FROM R-4 TO B-3 (COMMUNITY SHOPPING) DISTRICT
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1610 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
WHEREAS, United Aidines is the owner of property commonly known as 1610 West Algonquin
Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Parcel '~: That part of Lot 1 in Fdeddch Busse, Jr., division of land in Section 23, T41N,
R11E, of the Third Principal Meridian, as per Plat recorded February 20, 1911, as Doc.
No. 4709799, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the west line of said Lot
1,448.65' S of the NW corner thereof; thence E on the S line of the N 448.65' of Lot 1,
100'; thence S parallel to the west line of Lot 1,373.79' to the S line of Lot 1, being the
center line of Algonquin Road, as laid out in Friedrich Busse, Jr., division of the land;
thence northwesterly along the S line of Lot 1, 112.35' to the SW corner of Lot 1; thence
N on the west line of Lot 1,321.24' to the point of beginning in Cook County, Illinois.
Parcel 2: That part of Lot 1, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the S line
of the N 448.65' of said Lot 1,100' east of the W line thereof; running thence E along the
S line of the N 448.65' of Lot 1,100'; thence S on a line parallel with the west line of Lot
1,426.34' to the S line of Lot 1, being the center line of Algonquin Road; thence
northwesterly along the S line of Lot 1 112.35' to an intersection with a line 100' east of
and parallel with the west line of said Lot 1; thence north along said parallel line 373.79'
to the point of beginning in the Third Principal Meridian, as per Plat recorded on
February 20, 1911, as Doc. No. 4709799, in Cook County, Illinois.
Parcel 3: That part of Lot 1 in Fdeddch Busse, Jr., division of land in Section 23, T41N,
R11 E, of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the Plat thereof recorded February
20, 1911, as Doc. No. 4709799, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the S
line of the N 448.65' of said Lot 1,200' E of the W line thereof; thence S on a line parallel
with the west line of said Lot 1,426.34' to the center line of Algonquin Road, being the
S line of said Lot 1; thence southeasterly along said center line of Algonquin Road,
320.75', to a point which is 545.45' southeasterly of the SW comer of the west line of
said lot, 576.35' to the S line of the N 448.65' of Lot 1; thence W on said S line 285.46',
more or less to the beginning, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Eva Stevens, representing United Airlines (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application to rezone the Subject Property from R-4 (Multi-family Development) to B-3
(Community Shopping) district; and
WHEREAS, a public headng was held on the request for rezoning, being the subject of ZBA Case
No. 18-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25~ day
of May, 2000 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the Mount
ProsDect Dail_v Herald on the 8~' day of May, 2000; and
Page 2/2
United: Parking lot
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations relative
to ZBA 18-2000 to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered
the request being the subject of ZBA 18-2000 and have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact
by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as amended,
is hereby further amended by reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance from
R-4 (Multi-family Development) to B-3 (Community Shopping) District as shown on the attached
Site Plan, prepared by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, dated March 30, 2000, a copy of which is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VWL
6/13/00
6/15/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1610 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
WHEREAS, Eva Stevens (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner!') has filed a petition for a
Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 1610 West Algonquin Road, (hereinafter
referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows:
Parcel '1: That part of Lot 1 in Fdeddch Busse, Jr., division of land in Section 23, T41N,
R11 E, of the Third Principal Meridian, as per Plat recorded February 20, 1911, as Doc.
No. 4709799, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the west line of said Lot
1,448.65' S of the NW comer thereof; thence E on the S line of the N 448.65' of Lot 1,
100'; thence S parallel to the west line of Lot 1,373.79' to the S line of Lot 1, being the
center line of Algonquin Road, as laid out in Frieddch Busse, Jr., division of the land;
thence northwesterly along the S line of Lot 1, 112.35' to the SW corner of Lot 1; thence
N on the west line of Lot 1,321.24' to the point of beginning in Cook County, Illinois.
Parcel 2: That part of Lot 1, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the S line
of the N 448.65' of said Lot 1,100' east of the W line thereof; running thence E along the
S line of the N 448.65' of Lot 1,100'; thence S on a line parallel with the west line of Lot
1,426.34' to the S line of Lot 1, being the center line of Algonquin Road; thence
northwesterly along the S line of Lot 1 112.35' to an intersection with a line 100' east of
and parallel with the west line of said Lot 1; thence north along said parallel line 373.79'
to the point of beginning in the Third Principal Meridian, as per Plat recorded on
February 20, 1911, as Doc. No. 4709799, in Cook County, Illinois.
Parcel 3: That part of Lot 1 in Fdeddch Busse, Jr., dMsion of land in Section 23, T41 N,
R11 E, of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the Plat thereof recorded February
20, 1911, as Doc. No. 4709799, described as follows: Commencing at a point in the S
line of the N 448.65' of.said Lot 1,200' E of the W line thereof; thence S on a line parallel
with the west line of said Lot 1,426.34' to the center line of Algonquin Road, being the
S line of said Lot 1; thence southeasterly along said center line of Algonquin Road,
320.75', to a point which is 545.45' southeasterly of the SW corner of the west line of
said lot, 576.35' to the S line of the N 448.65' of Lot 1; thence W on said S line 285.46',
more or less to the beginning, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to develop a stand-alone parking lot; and
WHEREAS, a public headng was held on the request for a Conditional Use being the subject of
ZBA Case No. 18-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on
the 25"' day of May, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount
~:A~,LQ~L~i~ on the 8"' day of May, 2000; and
Page 2/3
United: Parking lot
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the
President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 18-2000; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given
consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the
Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest
of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
.SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
grant a Conditional Use, as provided in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the
development of a stand-alone parking lot on the subject property, as shown on the Site Plan, a
copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: Prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use, the
following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled:
1. Development of the site in general conformance with the submitted site plan prepared by
Skidmore, Owings & Merdll, dated March 30, 2000.
2. Development of the site in general conformance with the submitted landscape plan
prepared by Wolff, Clements and Associates, dated March 30, 2000.
3. Provide eleven (11) additional handicap accessible parking spaces in the closest accessible
locations within the existing parking lot on the office complex property or provide
documentation that sufficient handicap spaces exist in existing lots.
4. Submit final engineering plans for the site in general conformance with the submitted site
plan prepared by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, dated March 30, 2000 and meeting all
requirements of the Development Code.
5. Provide Development Code required right-of-way improvements for the entire frontage of
the three parcels.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy
of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
Page 3/3
United: Parking lot
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
President
A-i-I'EST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Comrnunity Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: MAY 31, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUN~ 6, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-2000 - 503 S. MAIN STREET
CONDITIONAL USE TO PERMIT A THREE-CAR GARAGE, ATTACHED
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use to permit construction of a three-
car attached garage at 503 S. Main Street. The subject property is an existing home on a 10,990 square foot lot on a
residential street. The petitioner proposes to demolish the existing house and construct a new two-story residence with
an attached three-car garage. Zoning Code Section 14.1003.A specifies that three-car garages are Conditional Uses in
the PA. district, regardless of whether they are detached or attached. In order to accommodate his proposed garage, the
petitioner is seeldmg a Conditional Use. The property and the proposed house and garage would meet all Zoning Code
bulk regulations.
The lot on which the proposed house and garage would be located is 70' in width. Those measurements are consistent
with the requirements in the R1 Zoning District, in which a three-car, attached garage is a permitted use. The
requirement for Conditional Use approval for a three-car garage in RA is to prevent construction of very large garages
on the 50' wide parcels pernfitted in the district. As the subject parcel is 70' wide, the proposed garage would be
appropriate to the lot size and, therefore, would have limited impact on the adjacent neighborhood.
Based on their consideration of the facts, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 6-0 to recommend approval for a
Conditional Use for three-car attached garage for the residence at 503 S. Main Street, Case No. ZBA-19-2000. The
Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use.
/JC
H:\G ENNn LNGLZBA~EBA 2000~MEJ Memos~ZBA-I 9-2000 (ortrmn residence) mej memo.dec
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PL~
II
DATE: MAY 19, 2000
HEARING DATE: MAY 25, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-2000 - 503 S. MAIN STREET
CONDITIONAL TO PERMIT A THREE-CAlL ATTACItED GARAGE
BACKGROUND INFORzMATION
Petitioner: Joseph J. OL UL~an
313 Bobby Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owner of the Property
Parcel Number: 05-12-309-022
Lot Size: 10,990 square feet
Existing Zoning: RA Single Family Kesidence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage: 31% existing
40% proposed
50% maximum per P,A district
Requested Action: Proposal for a Conditional Use to pem~it the construction of a three-ear attached garage.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE VARIATION
The subject property is an existing home located on a 70' X 157' (10,990 square feet) single-family lot on a
residential street. The lot is currently developed with a residence and associated existing single-car, detached
garage and driveway.
The petitioner is seeking to demolish the existing house and construct a new two-story residence with an
attached three-car garage. Zoning Code Section 14.1003.A specifies that three-car garages are Conditional Uses
in the PA. district, regardless of whether they are detached or attached. In order to accommodate his proposed
garage, the petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use. The property and the proposed house and garage would
meet all Zoning Code bulk regulations.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's pla; of survey and site
plan and visited the site.
ount Prospect Zomn~ Board of Appeals
Meeting of ",lay 25,
ZB A- 19-201~) Page 2
Engineering Division Comments
The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and has noted the existence of two large street ~ees in the
parkway adjacent to the subject prope~. The proposed driveway location and width may conflict with ~ose
existing trees. The Public Works Department would not support the removal or replacement of those ~ees.
Therefore, relocation of portion of the &iveway in the par~ay anWor reduction of its ~dth may be required
prior to issuance of a building pe~it for the prope~.
~QUI~D FINDINGS
Standards for Conditional Uses
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. ~e
section contains seven specific findings ~at must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. ~ese
standards relate to:
a ~e Conditional Use ~11 not have a de~imental effect on the public health, safeW, morals,
comfo~ or general well. e;
The Condkional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjo~ent, or value other prope~ies in the
~ciniW or impede the or&fly development of those propeaies;
a Adequate pro.sion of utilities and &ainage and desi~ of access and egess to minimize
congestion on Village s~eets; and
Compliance of the Conditional Use with &e pro~sions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code,
and o~er Village ~dinances.
~e proposed garage is a p~ of a new single-fa~ly residence ~at meets all setbacL height, and lot coverage
requirements. ~e lot on which the proposed house and garage would be located is 70' in ~dth. ~ose
meas~ements ~e consistent ~th the requirements in the R1 Zoning Dis~et, in which a t~ee-car, a~ehed
g~age is a pe~iaed use. ~e requirement for Condifonal Use approval for a ~ee-car garage in ~ is to
prevent cons~cfon ofve~ large garages on the 50' wide parcels pe~iaed in the dis~ct. As the subject p~cel
is 70' wide, the proposed garage would be appropriate to ~e lot size and, therefore, would have limited impact
on the adjacent neighborhood. ~e garage ~11 have no impact on ufili~ pro.sion or public s~ee~. ~e
proposed Conditional Use would be in compliance ~11 ~e Comprehensive Plan and ~e Zoning ~din~ee
requirements.
~CO~ATION
~e proposed Conditional Use would not have a negative effect on the public welfare or neighborhood c~ct~
and meets the findings required by ~e Conditional Use st~d~ds in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning
Ordin~ce. Based on ~ese findings, S~ffreco~ends that the ~A reco~end to the Village Bo~d approval
of the proposed Conditional Use to pe~t a t~ee-car, amched gmge for ~e new residence at 503 S. Main
S~eet, Case No. ZBA-19-2000, subject to approval of finaI plus by the Village Forester. ~e Village Board's
decision is final for this case.
I conch:
Will~J~C~o~f~o~iW Development
:
Elmhurst Road
P~e S~eet
Wffie S~eet
Main S~eet '~ Route 83
,
Emerson S~eet
,
MapleS~eet
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-19-2000 Hearing Date: May 25. 2000
PETITIONER: Joseph Ortman
313 Bobby Lane
Mount Prospect. IL 60056
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 503 S. Main St.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8. 2000 DAILYHERA£D
REQUEST: Conditional Use to permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-
car garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning District.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins. Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Joseph Ortman
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27. 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juraeek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 8:40, after hearing four other cases, Ms. Juracek introduced
Case ZBA-19-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-car
garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning District.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper by mailed notice
and with a sign on the property. He indicated that the subject property has an existing home located on a 70' wide lot
on a residential street. He stated that the lot is developed with a residence, single-car detached garage and a driveway,
and that the petitioner proposes to demolish the house and construct a new two-story residence with an attached three-
car garage. He stated that the Zoning Code lists three-car garages as Conditional Uses in the RA district, whether they
are attached or detached. He added that the property and the proposed house and garage would meet all Zoning Code
bulk regulations.
Mr. Perkins stated that the lot.for the proposed house and garage ~s 70' in width, which is consistent with the RI
Zoning district and that the R1 district lists three-car attached garages as permitted uses. He added that the Conditional
Use requirement for three-car garages in RA is to prevent construction of large garages on the 50' wide parcels
permitW, d in the district.
Following a brief discussion of the Zoning Code Standards for Conditional Uses and their application to the proposal.
he gave Staff's recommendation to approve the proposed Conditional Use, subject to the condition included in the staff
report. He informed the ZBA that the Village Board's decision is final for this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 19-2000
Arlene Juracek. Chairperson Page 2
Richard Rogers verified with Mr. Perkins that. with a zoning of R-I. a 3-car garage would be allowed: Mr. Perkins
said yes, it would go right to the building permit process. He said the petitioner's site is in a neighborhood of 50' lots
and his property consists of 1 lot and 40% of the adjacent lot.
Joseph Ortman was sworn in and stated he has letters of approval from two neighbors and another neighbor is present
to speak on his behalf. He stated he is a widower with two boys and will soon be married to a woman with three
children. He has lived in his home 24 years and wants to stay in that neighborhood of Mount Prospect. With three
more children, one with a driving permit, he will need a larger garage and home.
Ms. Juracek said the size of the lot would accommodate the home and garage and the plans were beautiful and
appropriate for the neighborhood She stated except but for the zoning, there would be no problem in approving this
garage. She said Mr. Ortman's request was entirely appropriate.
Mr. Ortman stated that the parkway trees would not be impacted by the plans. He said he does want to keep the trees.
Mr. Perkins said it appeared that the driveway would fit between the existing trees. If there is a problem, the portion of
the driveway on the parkway could be narrower.
Leo Floros asked about Mr. Ortman's address on the petition - 313 Bobble Lane and asked if he didn't he live in the
Main Street house?
Mr. Ortman said he moved to that address temporarily to start building the new house.
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for Case ZBA-19-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to
permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-car garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning
District. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:40 p.m., Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Michael B~iue
Community Development Deputy Director
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNER JEFF PERKINS
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK LINDELOF
DATE: MAY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-2000; PLATOF RESUBDIViSION
(503 SOUTH MAIN STREET)
We have completed our review of ZBA-19-2000, the requested Conditional Use to allow
a three-car garage, and have the following comments:
1. The preliminary plan shows the new garage being constructed across a property
line. We understand the property owner is in the process of resubdividing and
consolidating the two parcels (PC-2-2000) in an effort to eliminate this property
line. We have no objection to the proposed garage subject to the condition that
the Plat of Resubdivision is completed and recorded. Please note that the
Building Permit for the proposed garage cannot be issued until this Plat of
Resubdivision is recorded.
2. The plan does not show two (2) existing parkway trees near the proposed
driveway location. Please note that the proposed driveway shall not be
permitted within 10' of the tree north of the driveway, or within 15' of the tree
south of the proposed driveway.
If you have any questions, please feel free tO call.
Chuck Lindelof
c. Forestry Superintendent Sandy Clark
X:\FILES\ENGINEER\REV-EN G~ZBA~2000\503S Main.doc
M0000071
Village of Mou 0spect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY JR., DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA 19-2000, 503 S. MAIN STREET - REQUEST TO WITHDRAW PETITION
Attached is a letter from the petitioner for ZBA case # 19-2000 withdrawing his petition for a Conditional Use
Permit for an attached three-car garage. Please forward this memorandum and attachment to the Village Board
for their review and consideration at the June 20t~ meeting4
une 14, 2000
Village of Mt Prospect
100 S Emerson Street
Mt Prospect IL 60056
To Whom It May Concern:
I Joseph J Ortman, am cancelling the variance request on my home
at 503 S. Main Street, Mt Prospect.
Joseph J O~£man
owner
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JUNE 16, 2000
SUBJECT: PC-05-2000/DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION FOR STORM WATER
DETENTION
2 E. RAND ROAD (SHELL GAS STATION)
SHELL OIL COMPANY
The petitioner, Shell Oil Company, proposes to improve an existing gas station. The project entails constructing a
420 square foot addition with retail space and handicap accessible restrooms. The retail component of the project
requires that the site include two parking spaces. This requirement triggers the application of the Development
Code.
Currently there is no stormwater detention for the property. The petitioner is seeking relief from this requirement
and does not propose to provide detention, due to site constraints (underground gas tanks, ptunps, car wash),
IDOT regulations, and the shape of the property constituting a hardship. However, they will be reducing the
amount of impervious lot coverage; the site currently has approximately 79% lot coverage and the petitioner
proposes to reduce coverage to approximately 65%. In addition, the petitioner will upgrade the propexty with
landscaping, new facades, and improving access to the site. If the petitioner is required to provide stormwater
detention, they will not be able to improve the property.
The Plan Commission met in a special session June 14, 2000 and discussed the petitioner's request. The Plan
Commission voted 6-0 to approve an exception to the Development Code requirement for storm water detention.
In addition, the Plan Commission recommended that the petitioner's landscape plan be designed in a manner that
is consistent with the Village's proposed Corridor Design Guidelines.
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MICHAEL ZADEL, CHAIRMAN
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 1, 2000
SUBJECT: PC-05-2000/SHELL GAS STATION (2 E. RAND ROAD)
DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION
Background
Petitioner: Warren Johnson Architects, Inc.
19 N. Greeley Street
Palatine, Illinois 60067-5025
Property Owner: Shell Oil Company
1415 W. 22'a Street
Oakbrook, Illinois 60522
Requested Actions: Exception to See. 16.405.F.1 Detention Requirements
Lot coverage: Existing Lot Coverage: 79%
Permitted Lot Coverage: 75%
Proposed Lot Coverage: 67% (approximately)
Analysis
The property owner proposes to improve the existing Shell gas station by removing the attendant building and
constructing a new building for the attendant with a small convenience mart. Plans include a new fagade, two
handicapped accessible restrooms, narrowing the size of the western driveways to improve traffic flow, and
reducing the amount of impervious surface. The property is located between two IDOT roads (Rand and
Kensington Roads) and is required to meet IDOT regulations in addition to the Village's Development Code
regulations. Plans for reconfiguring the driveways are being reviewed by IDOT.
Currently there is no stormwnter detention for the property. According to the Development Code, the petitioner
would be required to provide approximate 0.17 ae-ft of detention storage. The petitioner is seeking relief from
this requirement and does not propose to provide detention. However, they will be reducing the amount of
impervious lot coverage. An analysis of the request is provided below.
Baek~runnd
The petitioners request to provide no stonnwater detention is consistent with the nature of other Development
Code exceptions requests previously reviewed by the Plan Commission. Redeveloping a coramereial site that
may have been originally developed under County requirements or developed at a time when the Viii.age codes
did not address an issue creates challenges when the site is required to meet ctuxent requireraents. In this case, the
Mount Prospect Plan Commission
PC-05-2000/Development at Rand & Kensington Roads (Development Code Exception) Page 2
site is smaller, an odd shape, and is bounded by IDOT regulated roads. Furthermore, the current use of the
property (gas station) and the structures associated with this type of use (gas pumps, car wash) create unusual
needs for the site's configuration.
As noted in previous cases before the Plan Commission, the Village is experiencing more in-fill growth then in
the past few years, posing challenges with redevelopment sites. Typically, the larger developments such as
Menard's and Northwest Elestric were able to meet stormwater detention requirements by storing the water
underground in extremely large pipes. Other developers sought relief from code requirements when they found
that it was not feasible to meet the regulations and that a feasible alternative existed, or that the request did not
create a hazardous situation. For example, the property at I W. Rand Road sought relief from the stormwater
detention regulations (location of an above ground detention facility) because the site fronted onto two [DOT
regulated roads, was triangular shaped, and included atypical existing drainage features. Similarly, the property at
2 E. Rand Road is also difficult to develop because of its triangular shape, frontage onto two [DOT regulated
roads, and use as a gas station.
Development Code Exception
As with previous requests for exceptions to Development Code regulations, the Plan Commission is required to
make a determination based on the criteria listed in Section 16.111 of the Development Code, which states that a
severe hardship, caused by conditions uniquely atthbutable to the land under consideration, would be imposed
upon an applicant by compliance with the regulations.
The property measures less than half of an acre. The underground storage tanks, gas pumps/islands, and the
underground lines linking the two together occupy a significant amount of the property. The proposed
improvements do not include changing the location of the car wash, gas pumps or canopy. Consequently the
proposed improvements are limited by the size of the property and the "fixed" structures. Currently the property
exceeds the amount of permitted impervious lot coverage. The site does not meet code requirements for
landscaping and the site appears dated. Should the petitioner be required to provide stormwater detention per
Village code requirements, the petitioner will not be able to improve the property. The site constraints
(underground gas tanks, pumps, car wash), [DOT regulations, and the shape of the property constitute a hardship
as to providing stormwater detention per code.
The Engineering Division reviewed the petitioner's project. The attached memo from Chuck Lindelof, Project
Engineer, evaluates the feasibility of providing above ground detention, underground detention, and a
combination of both concepts and concluded that it may be physically possible to provide detention, but it is not
realistically feasible. In addition, the Engineering Division is not aware of any drainage problems at 2 E. Rand
Road. Therefore, the request to provide no stormwater detention would not create a drainage problem because the
amount of lot coverage will be reduced.
Corridor Improvements
Consistent with previous requests for relief from code requirements, this case provides the Village with an
opportunity to work with the petitioner to create an enhancement to this property. The property is visible from
several major thoroughfares and is located in a high-profile commercial area. Although the petitioner has a
landscape plan for 2 E. Rand Road, it is feasible, although not a condition of approval, for the Village to request
that the pedtioner's landscape plan be redesigned and implemented in a manner that is consistent with the
proposed Corridor Design Guidelines and exceed the minimum amount of landscaping required by Village code.
Recommendation
The standards for an exception as listed in the Development Code require that the Plan Commission find that
severe hardship, caused by conditions uniquely attributable to the land under consideration, would be imposed
upon an applicant by compliance with these regulations. Although the petitioner could provide some stormwater
detention using a combination of above ground and underground storagu, the amount would not be s~ffioient and
ount Prospect Plan Commission
PC-05-2000/Development at Rand & Kensington Roads (Development Code Exception) Page 3
the manner in which it would be constructed is not practically feasible. Therefore, staff recommends approval of
the petitioner's request for relief from the Development Code requirement to provide stormwater detention for the
property located at 2 E. Rand Road, Case No. PC-05-2000 and that the petitioner's landscape plan is designed in a
manner that is consistent with the Village's proposed Corridor Design Guidelines.
I concur:
Michael glue, AICP
Deputy Director of Community Development
/bs
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNER JUDY CONNOLLY
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK LINDELOF
DATE: MAY 30, 2000
SUBJECT: PC-5-2000; REQUESTED STORMWATER DETENTION EXCEPTION
(2 EAST RAND ROAD)
The improvements proposed for the Shell Station at 2 East Rand Road include the
construction of a new building for the attendant and a small convenience mart.
Because this new building creates a requirement for two (2) or more parking spaces,
the entire site must be brought into compliance with the Village Development Code.
This would include a requirement to provide approximately 0.17 acre-feet (7,400 cubic
feet) of stormwater detention for the entire site.
The applicant has requested an exemption from this requirement for stormwater
detention. This request is based upon the fact that the existing site is almost 100%
impervious. The proposed improvements would decrease the amount of impervious
surface thereby decreasing the amount of stormwater runoff generated by the site.
We have explored the feasibility of providing stormwater detention above and/or below
ground and offer the following observations:
Above Ground Storaqe
1. The only large landscaped area on site is at the northwest corner of the site.
This comer is bounded by Rand Road and Kensington Road; both under Illinois
Department of Transportation (IDOT) jurisdiction. Consequently, this area is
subject to IDOT requirements concerning offsets of ponds from IDOT rights of
way. We estimate that no more than 18% of the required detention storage
could be stored in this area.
2. The existing concrete pavement over the.storage tanks and under the canopy is
to remain. While the asphalt pavement on site is to be replaced, little flexibility
exists for modifying the grades to create storage; the new pavement must meet
the existing grades at the existing concrete pads, building, and driveways. ',
Furthermore, we would not recommend ponding water over the access to the
age 2
PC-5-00
May 30, 2000
storage tanks. Thus the only pavement area available for storage is northwest of
the canopy. Using a maximum ponding depth of 12", we estimate that less than
10% of the required storage could be provided in this area.
Underqround Storaqe
1. No information was provided for the existing storm sewer in either Rand Road or
Kensington Road. If we assume a 48" diameter pipe for underground storage,
the total length of pipe required would be nearly 600'. If above ground storage is
used in conjunction with underground storage, the total length could be reduced.
2. Although complete site utilities are not shown, it would appear that the existing
building, canopy and storage tanks would limit any underground storage t~ the
area northwest of the canopy.
General Considerations
1. Any stormwater detention facility would require a piped outlet discharging into a
storm sewer in either Rand Road of Kensington Road. It is not clear if IDOT
would permit such a connection.' Only two (2) inlets are shown, one in each
street. If the pipes draining these inlets are not deep enough, then a connection
to the main sewer in the Rand Road or Kensington Road pavement; or a
pumped discharge would be necessary.
2. For any stormwater detention facility to be effective the entire site must drain to
it. As mentioned previously, the site currently sheet drains to Rand Road and
Kensington through all four (4) driveways. Some reshaping of the parking lot
grades and storm sewer would be needed to confine this runoff on site and
convey it to the detention facility.
3. As with other previously developed gas stations, the possibility exists that the
existing underground storage tanks have leaked and contaminated the
surrounding soil. Providing any stormwater detention on this site would require
excavation and could disturb this potentially contaminated soil. If contaminated
soil is found, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency requirements for
disposing of contaminated soils would have to be followed.
Based upon the observations listed above, we believe that it is possible to provide
stormwater detention for the site. However, because of the unusual characteristics of
the site, the design options are extremely limited and costly.
Chuck Lindelof
X:~ILEb-%ENG[NEER'~.EV-ENG~SheaStat[on'~C-5-00,doc
I,kqF'PBI JOHI,f=J]l-I__ AF'~-H[TE~ET'S, IIIE PHOIIE HCI. : q,_4~ ..... ~'9 9641 Ma,¢. 23 2[XDO 01:2:3PM p2
Director of Community Development
Mr. William J. Cooney
100 S. Emerson St.
Mgunt Prospect, 1~ 60056
RE: Shell Oil Project
2 E. Rand Rd.
Mount Prospect, IL
Dear Mr. Cooney,
Warren Johnson Architects has been reta/ned by Shelf Oil Company to act on their
behalf at the above referenced location.
We are seeking relief from thc site dcvctopmcnt code as it relates to detention.
The site is being improved with a 420 s_f. addition to the car wash building. This
ad:dition will provide interior access to the cashier along with (2) handicapped accessible
restrooms. The overall exterior building fagade will be upgraded and have a cleaner
sleeker appearance. The driveways are being reduced in size and design to facilitate
ea.siex ingress and egress. Additional landscaping is being installed at the intersection and
along both street frontages. The entire yard will be repaved. The current site impervious
maw-fit be reduced from 17,652.64 to 15,086_74_
The existing site conditions (islands, underground tanks etc.) and the Illinois
Department of Transpoxtation requirements make it impossible to locate any underground
detention. We feel the site and building improvements will significantly highlight the
comer. The absence of detention will have no impact on the surrounding area as the
drainage pattern will not be altered and the paved area will be decreased.
ReSpectfully submitted,
Site area= 22,353 sq. fc or 0.5132 acres
Existing paved area= 17,682.64
Proposed paved area= 15,0866.74
Existing landscaped area-- 2653.75
Proposed landscaped.area= 4693.07
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
June 14, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman
Michael Zadel au 7:02 p.m. at the Village Hall. 100 South Emerson Street. Mount Prospect.
Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: Michael Zadel. Chairman
Antoinette Astreides
Edwin Janus
William Reddy
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Frank Boege
Gary GTouwinkel
Village Staff Present: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Chuck Lindelof, P.E., Project Engineer
Others in Attendance: Todd Tageson
Peter Balmes
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chairman Zadel opened the meeting and said that the minutes would be reviewed after the Development
Code exception request was heard. The Development Code case was completed and Chairman Zadel
revisited Approval of the Minutes. He asked if there were any questions or revisions. As there were none,
Carol Tortorello moved to approve the minutes and Bill Reddy seconded the motion. The motion was
approved with Tonic Astreides andEd Janus abstaining.
SUBDMSlONS:
NONE
OLD BUSINESS:
PC-05-2000/Development Code Exception/2 E. Rand Road (Shell Gas Station)
Chairman Zadel introduced the first item of business and asked Judy Connolly to review the case. Ms.
Cormolly said that the petitioner, Shell Oil, proposes to improve an existing Shell Gas Station at the comer
of Rand and Kensington Roads. She said that the project inoludes removing the outdoor kiosk/attendant
box and constructing a 420 square foot addition onto the existing car wash to accommodate the cashier and
a small amount of retail space. She said that the Development Code applies to the project because the
remodeled structure will have retail space, which requires two parking spaces. She said that the petitioner
is st~king an exception to the Development Code for storm water detention and proposes not to provide
storm water detention.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of June 14, 2000 Meeting Page 2
She said that currently there is no stormwater detention for the site and that the Village is not
aware of any drainage or flooding problems. The petitioner's plans include reducing the amount
of impervious surface to approximately 67% and installing landscaping around the perimeter of
the property. Ms. Cormolly said that the property is bounded by two IDOT roads and is required
to follow their regulations in addition to the Village's regulations. Furthermore, the size, shape,
and the fact that the site is a gas station imposes further constraints on viable locations for
stormwater detention. She said that the petitioner is not changing the tanks, gas pumps or the
canopy, which also limits the amount of flexibility in locating the detention. Therefore, the
permitted locations for the detention do not allow for sufficient capacity or the appropriate
manner to provide detention.
Ms. Connolly said that staff recommends approval of the petitioner's Development Code
exception request and not provide storm water detention with the condition that the landscape
plan be consistent with the Village's proposed Corridor Design Guideline requirements. She said
that Chuck Lindelof from the Village's Engineering Division and representatives of the petitioner
were available to answer questions about the project:
Todd Tageson, representative of the petitioner, said that [DOT reviewed the reconfigured access
to the site. He presented the final design and said that the revised design approved by [DOT
reduced the amount of impervious surface to less than 65%.
There was general discussion about the amount of lot coverage and how the increase in green
space would significantly benefit the site. Chairman Zadel said that the mn-off from the site
sheet drains into Rand Road and that he is not aware of any drainage problems at the site. Bill
Reddy agreed and asked if the new projects occurring around Rand/Iiensington/Elmhurst Roads
were reviewed together. Chuck Lindelof said that the projects were reviewed separately for
detention requirements and Mr. Tageson added that [DOT reviewed access to Shell and the
proposed CVS site, across the street, together to ensure optimal traffic flow and access to the
sites.
There was discussion about redeveloping a site as opposed to improving a site and how the
Village codes were applied. Matt Sledz compared the projects at 1 E. Rand Road and 1 W. Rand
Road to complete redevelopment projects because the existing structures were raised, in contrast
to Shell's improvement project, where primary structures were not changed but the project
significantly improved the property.
There was general discussion about the proposed retail space and what items would be sold; the
impact of the remodeling on the car wash stacking space, and access for the tanker tracks. Peter
Balmes said that the stacking and access issues were reviewed by Shell's internal design team
before they submitted plans to the Village. He said that Shell reviews plans to make sure the
tankers can access the site easily and to determine what, if any, impacts will result if the station is
remodeled.
There was further discussion about the project and how the petitioner had a legitimate hardship
because of the siZe and shape of the property and that the reduced mount of impervious surface
would be an asset to the site. Carol Tortorello moved to approve the Development Code
exception and not require the petitioner to provide stormwater detention for 2 E. Rand Road and
that the site be landscaped ina manner consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines.
Bill Reddy seconded the motion, which was approved 6-0:
OUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of June 14. 2000 Meeting Page 3
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS:
There was general discussion about starting the Plan Commission meetings at 7 p.m. It was
agreed that the June 21 meeting would start at 7 p.m. because agencies and service groups would
be making presentations ~o obtain CDBG funds and that it would be easier for the presenters to
have an earlier start time, as opposed to a meeting that ran later. Plan Commissmn members
requested that meeting "start time" be a June 21, 2000 agenda item and formal action would be
taken at that time.
Bill Keddy moved to adjourn the meeting and Tonie Asterieds seconded the motion. The mouon
carried 6-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
~u~ith ~I~ ~'~orl~oll~,, A~CP ~,L~--~
Senior Planner
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY JR., DH1.ECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF A PORTION OF 411 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Attached to this memorandum is an ordinance that would authorize the purchase of a portion of the property
commonly known as 411 Business Center Drive. The land proposed for purchase is necessary to realign the
intersection of Business Center Drive and Harvest Lane as illustrated on Exhibit A. I would request that the
Village Board authorize the purchase of the subject property in an amount not to exceed $18,500.
During the recent public hearings for the Menard's development, several Harvest Heights residents expressed their
concerns with the subject intersection. The concerns related to the difficulty of turning left off of Harvest Lane
onto Business Center Drive and with the amount of stacking that occurred because of the difficulty of this
movement. In addition, concerns were raised with the potential increased traffic from Menard's patrons that
would exasperate the situation. As a result of these concerns, Menard's was required to move their Harvest Lane
entrance drive further east from Business Center Drive.
In an effort to further improve traffic flow and overall safety at this location, staff is proposing that the Village
redesign the intersection as illustrated on Exhibit A. The realignment provides for a ninety-degree angled
intersection and both right and left turn lanes at Business Center Drive which will improve the overall capacity at
this intersection. It is anticipated that the cost of modifying the intersection will be around $50,000, not including
the above stated acquisition costs. All costs associated with this improvement will be covered by the CIP Street
Reconstruction fund (account #5607706-690094, page #288 of the Budget).
Please forward this memorandum to the Village Board for their review and consideration at the March 7th
meeting. Staffwill be present at that meeting to further discuss this matter.
]'OS
VWL
6/13/00
6/15/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
411 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is an Illinois Home Rule municipality; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect deem it necessary and
advisable for the Village to acquire the property legally described on Exhibit A to improve its roadway
system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Acting in the exercise of its Home Rule power, it is hereby determined that it is
necessary, proper and desirable that the Village of Mount Prospect acquire title to, and possession of, the
real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached to and made a part of this Ordinance.
SECTION TVVO: Having determined that the acquisition is in the best interests of the Village of Mount
Prospect, the Village President and Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such documents as
are necessary to purchase the property in an amount not to exceed $18,500.00.
SECTION THREE: The Village President, Board of Trustees, Village Clerk, Village Manager, Village
Attorney, Special Attorneys, officers and employees are hereby empowered to perform any act necessary
to implement, carry out and give effect to the terms and provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Fadey
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
vwl
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description for Harvest Lane Relocation at 411 Business Center Drive
Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 10 in Kensington Center Phase One, being
a subdivision in the East half of Section 34, and the West half of Section 35, in
Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the third principal meridian, in Cook County,
Illinois, thence north 89° 39' 56" west a distance of 580.70 feet along the south property
line to the Point of Beginning, thence north 60° 12' 54" east a distance of 36.77 feet
along the westerly property line, thence along an arc having a radius of 544.70 feet a
distance of 60.15 feet along the westerly property line, thence south 28° 50' 04" east a
distance of 59.54 feet, thence westedy a distance of 110 feet along the south property
line to the point of beginning.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
SUBJECT: 2000 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
SUNSET ROAD VACATION
Part of this year's reconstruction program includes Robert Drive fi.om Lonnquist Blvd. To Glenn
Lane. The west-most leg of Sunset Road intersects with Robert Drive within the reconstruction
limits. This portion of Sunset Road is fully improved but in need of reconstruction. In addition
it is a dead end street and no further extension is possible. For these reasons I propose the
following:
1. Remove the entire pavement structure (curb, asphalt, base, etc.)
2. Remove the sidewalk
3. Remove the guard rail
4. Restore the area with topsoil and sod
5. Offer the Pdght-of-Way property to the adjacent land owners (one-half to each)
The enclosed drawing shows the details for this section of Sunset Road.
I have contacted the adjacent landowners and they have given me a verbal indication that they
would accept the vacated property. The adjacent landowners are:
n Mark Fedor 814 Robert Drive
c~ Helen Koulos 900 Robert Drive
It is therefore my recommendation that the Village vacate this portion of Sunset Road and that
the Village Board consider this proposal at their Board Meeting on June 20, 2000. The Village
Attorney, Buzz Hill has prepared the necessary ordinance and it is attached for your review.
~/. J~0jzl Michalik~
I concur with the above recommendation.
~dler
Attachments:
X:\FILES\ENGIN EER\RECONSTXRecon2000\CorrcshM EMO_JAN2.DOC
vwl
6/13/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN PROPERTY (PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY)
OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AT THE CORNER OF SUNSET ROAD AND ROBERT DRIVE
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined
that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by vacating
that portion of right of way, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance, generally located at the corner of Sunset Road and' Robert Drive, Mount
Prospect, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the public right of way being the subject of this Ordinance shall benefit
adjacent property owners; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined
that the Village of Mount Prospect has no need for that portion of right of way being the
subject of this Ordinance, and that the best interests of the Village wilt be served by
vacation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have
determined that the best interests of the Village would be served by vacating the public
right of way shown on Exhibit '%."
SECTION TWO: That upon passage and approval of this Ordinance by a two-thirds
vote of the corporate authorities, the Village Manager shall be authorized to obtain a
Plat of Vacation consistent with Exhibit "A" and, the Village Clerk is hereby authorized
and directed to file a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with a copy of the Plat of
Vacation indicating the vacation parcel being the subject of this Ordinance, with the
Cook County Recorder of Deeds.
Page 2/2
Sunset/Robert
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:~G E NViles\WlN~O RDINANC\Vac~tion, Sunset & Robec[.doc
IEXHIBIT "A"]i
LONNQUIST BLVD
ROBIN LN
::="~SUNSET RD
~ Area t0be Vacated
~en Koul~
~ ,GREEN ACRES L~
m GLENN LN
GOLF'RD
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 13, 2000
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO PURCHASE ELECTRIC POWER JOINTLY WITH
CHICAGO ALLIANCE
At the Mamh 14 Committee of the Whole meeting the Village Board authorized Village staff
to submit five existing CornEd electric accounts that were chosen as eligible for
participation through the Common Ownership Lottery to the Chicago Alliance for bulk
electric power purchase. The Chicago Alliance is made up of the City of Chicago, Chicago
Transit Authority, Chicago Park District, and Chicago City Colleges. The Alliance has
extended an invitation through the NWMC for municipalities to participate in the bulk
purchase in an attempt to add to the total overall block of power that would be purchased
through an authorized supplier. The Mount Prospect accounts were submitted and added
to the total amount of electricity that will soon be marketed to all 14 ICC authorized power
providers.
In order to consummate the Village participation a number of documents need to be
approved and submitted to the alliance via NVVMC. One caveat is that once the
commitment to participate is authorized by the municipality that participation cannot be
withdrawn for at least three years (proposed length of agreement). It is very likely that the
amount of bulk power that will be available for bidding by electric power supply vendors will
be attractive enough to warrant a 10-15% (estimated to be $10,000 to $12,000) reduction
the cost of electric service for Village functions like street lighting, water pumping, and the
train station. The Village has other accounts that may be eligible for participation in the
future once the market opens up completely next year, therefore, this limited number of
amounts submitted for consideration will be a meaningful test to determine if actual savings
are possible.
The Alliance is planning to submit an RFP in early July and needs a firm commitment from
participating municipalities prior to the RFPs being mailed out so that a firm amount of bulk
power can be effectively marketed. The participating municipalities will contract directly with
the Alliance for the power and the Alliance will be the lead contracting authority. The
ROPOSAL TO PURCHASE ELECTRIC POWER JOINTLY WITH CHICAGO ALLIANCE
June 13, 2000
Page 2
vendor that will eventually be selected will provide electricity through the power grid and
the participants will be metered at the locations where the power is utilized. A list of the 14
firms that are authorized by the iCC to provide electric power is enclosed and if there are
any conflicts of interest among ~(he elected officials with the proposed firms, the Alliance
has requested information on that declaration be submitted with the executed copy of the
ordinance authorizing participation.
Action Requested:
1) Approval of an ordinance authorizing Mount Prospect to participate in the joint
purchase program with the Chicago Alliance.
2) Authorize a Village representative to serve as the "point person" for the program.
3) Authorization of a letter be drafted and sent to the Chicago Alliance acknowledging
the conditions outlined in the RFP.
4) Authorization to execute a confidentiality agreement with the City of Chicago to limit
access to the RPF until it is provided to the vendors for bidding purposes.
A copy of all the sample documents are enclosed and the draft RFP is provided to Village
Board members only and not distributed to the general public as requested by the Alliance.
If there are issues with the RFP document please contact me directly since the discussion
of some of the RFP items may be a violation of the confidentially agreement. The purpose
not distributing the RPF is to avoid any unfair marketing actions by possible power supply
vendors. Once the preferred vendor is determined it will be necessary for further Village
Board action to execute a power purchase agreement that may include the waiver of the
bidding procedure because of the joint purchase, similar to the other joint purchases with
NWMC.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
DAVID STRAHL
Village Manager Michael E. Janonis
C:
H:\GEN~Utilities'Joint Purchase Cover Memo for Chicago Attiance.doc
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE ~c u£ MumaFP'rospect
1616 East Golf Road ~m ~~ .,~a~ 100 South Emerson
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 N'WM~ Mount Prospect, IL 60056
(847) 296-9200 · Fax (847) 296-9207 ~
· www. nwmc-cog, org '
MEMBERS
Antioch
Arlington Heights
Barrington June 9, 2000
Bartlett
Buffalo Grove
Carpentersville
Cary
Des Plaines To: Contacts on Proposal to Purchase Electric Power Jointly with
Elk Grove Village Chicago Alliance
G~e.~o~ From: Christine Martin, Policy Analyst
Grayslake
Hanover Park Re: Proposal to Purchase Electric Power Jointly with Chicago Alliance
Highland Park
Hoffman Estates
Lake Barrington
Lake Forest Our records show that your local government sent a letter to the City of
Lake Zur~h Chicago indicating interest in its proposal to have suburban local
u~ne governments jointly purchase power with the Chicago Alliance. The
Uncothshite
Lirmolnwood Chicago Alliance is a partnership that includes the City of Chicago, the
Norton Grove Chicago Transit Authority, the Chicago Park District, and the Chicago
Mount Prospect
Niles City Colleges.
Northbrook
North field
Fa~li.e AS you know, the City of Chicago held a meeting on June 6 to explain its
Park Ridge proposal to interested suburban local governments. At that meeting, the
prospect Heights
Rolling Moadows City distributed the following documents:
Rooelle
Schaumburg
Skokie · a sample ordinance authorizing your local government to participate in
South Rarfington the joint purchase program and appointing an "authorized individual"
St. Charles
Streamwood to serve as point person for the program;
Vernon Hills
Wheeling · a form letter indicating that your local government acknowledges
Wilme~e certain conditions for participating in the Chicago Alliance's RFP;
Elk Crave Twp. * a confidentiality agreement that the City of Chicago requests that you
Ma~ Twp. sign so that it may share information with you about the RFP; and
New Trier Twp,
Uo~r.~ T,,. * the draft RFP developed by the City of Chicago. The City of Chica~o
Wheeling TWP. asks that you take all possible measures to protect the confidentiality
AFFILIATE MEMBER of this draft RFP.
Goli
OFFICERS Please let the Conference know if you need an additional copy of any of
w~,t the documents listed above.
Mark W, Damisch
Nor~hbrook
Vice-President Sillce the June 6 meeting, the City has forwarded to us a memo that
R~ L Mol,.s explains what you must do to participate in the joint purchase program. A
Palatine copy of that memo is attached, along with a list of the local governments
s~o~,~ that have expressed an interest in the joint purchase program.
Jem/D. Sadler
Wheeling TWP.
Law ~.A~ft
Morton Grove
Executive Director
Please note that in order to participate in the program you must submit the
following documents to the Northwest Municipal Conference no later thsn
July 7, 2000.
1. any ordinance or resolution that your attorney determines that your
local government must approve in order to participate in the
program (sample ordinance distributed at June 6 meeting);
2. a signed letter acknowledging that your local government will be
part of the RFP (form letter distributed at June 6 meeting); and
3. a signed confidentiality agreement (distributed at June 6 meeting).
If you cannot meei the July 7 deadline, please let the Conference know as
soon as possible. We may be able to work with the City to make
alternative arrangements if necessary.
The City of Chicago requests that you review the draft RFP carefully. In
particular, please let the City know as soon as possible if you have any
purchasing policies that cannot be waived and must be added to the RFP
The City requests that you waive any purchasing policies that are the
result of purely local decision making, such as policies to buy locally
produced products or to avoid doing business with scofflaws. On the
other hand, if you have purchasing policies that cannot be waived because
they stem from state or federal law and that must be added to the
Alliance's RFP in order for you to participate, then please notify the City
as soon as possible.
The City of Chicago also requests that you let it know if you currently
have any special arrangements with an electric service provider. For
example, if you have an arrangement whereby your local government is
compensated for curtailing power usage upon Commonwealth Edison's
request, please advise the City. They may be able to work it into the bid
specifications and the subsequent negotiations.
The Alliance plans to issue its RFP in July. Negotiations with respondents
will begin in the fall. The Northwest Municipal Conference will have two
observers at the negotiations. The Alliance hopes to allow RFP
· participants to begin purchasing power from a selected provider on or after
January 1, 2001. Those who participate in the RFP should expect the
Alliance to enter into a master contract with individual local governments
signing individual contracts with thc selected electric service provider for
specific electric service accounts. According to the City, the term of the
purchase will be at least three years, with the exact length to be
determined in the course of negotiations.
At the June 6 meeting, at least one municipal attorney asked about the
possibility of a conflict of interest arising ifa village trustee or city council
2
member has a financial interest in a company that might respond to the
Alliance's RFP. Those who attended the meeting may remember that the
City responded that the list of those companies that could legally respond
to the RFP was short. According to the web site maintained by the Illinois
Commerce Commission (ICC) (www.icc.state.il.us/consurner/plugin/certlist.htm),
the companies that have been certified by the ICC as suppliers of
electricity include:
· AmerenCIPS
· Central Illinois Light Company (CILCO)
· Dynegy Energy Services, Inc.
· Edgar Electric Co-Operative Association, dba EnerStar Power Corp.
· Enron Energy Services, Inc.
· Illinois Power Company
· MidAmerican Energy
· NewEnergy Midwest, LLC
· Nicer Energy, LLC
· Peoples Energy Services Corporation
· South Beloit Water Gas & Electric Co.
· Unicom Energy, Inc.
· WPS Energy Services, Inc.
· CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company (ICC approval .
pending)
Conceivably, if one of your trustees or city council members has a
financial interest in one of the companies listed above, he or she could
have a potential conflict of interest regarding the joint purchase of electric
power. Your legal staff should be able to advise you regarding this
possibility.
Please remember that a joint purchase of electric power through the
Alliance will not affect your franchise agreements, which govern
Commonwealth Edison's use of your right of way. It also will not affect
your arrangements for free service from Commonwealth Edison unless
you choose to make changes to those accounts. Most NWMC-area
municipalities have chosen not to make any changes to these accounts
because a recent analysis (performed by Energy Exchange of Chicago,
Inc. for NWMC members in 1999) showed that most NWMC members
would realize little benefit from changing their free service arrangements.
The Alliance plans to negotiate a purchas'e price based not only on
savings, but also on the respondents' ability to provide clean air. benefits
by using renewable resources and enhancing energy efficiency. The final
purchase, therefore, probably will not be at a rock-bottom price; however,
the Alliauee hopes that it will yield other benefits for the entire region,
such as better compliance with the federal Clean Air Act. Although the
Alliance cannot promise any definite savings, it does note that the
combined buying power of the Alliance plus nearly 70 suburban local
governments is likely to be unprecedented. The Alliance expects to secure
a per kilowatt hour price and to ask those responding to its RFP to offer to
guarantee a specific savings rate. In this way, the Alliance hopes to shift
all risk for market fluctuations to the selected electric service provider.
If you have any questions, please contact the Northwest Municipal
Conference at 847-296-9200.
Enclosure
4
Cit~ of Cl~-~go To All Members of~he Attached List
Richard NJ. [}ale), M~yor
om~ ~ m~,, You ~vc si~ficd yo~ interest in p~cipa~ng in ~ request for
Cit~ R~IL g~m 50~ ~rO~S~lS for ~c pu~h~e of clec~ci~ issued by ~e Loc~ Gove~ent
ll I Nor~ L~le S~t '
cm~o. n~o~ ~o~ Ele~c Pow~ ~li~ce (~e ~'~li~cc'') which is comp~ed of~e Ci~ of
O~z) v~.9~o0 Chicago, C~cago Park Dis~ct, CNcago Tr~n~t Au~or~, C~cago School
~t~:,~,,.~,~ a.~, Refo~ Bo~d of T~t~ea and Ci~ Colleges of ~icago. On'~csday, June 5m
a mectiug was held to ~a~s implm~on of ~e joint p~chase. This memo
~I1 ~c ~ a follow-up m ~t m~fing m recap major poem. oull~e reqa~ed
al~s; N~li~t ~e req~red t~c ~e ~d id~' comacm.
~e Alliance will be issu~ a request for proposaN for clectNc supply
se~iec (~e "~P") at~e md of J~c/e~ly I~ly. ~e ~P will rcqu~e
pro~sers (clec~e u~ifies ~d almmafive r~l encr~ supplic~, as ~fin=d m
Se~iou 1 ~102 of ~ois P~Uc Act 90-561; coll~fively, *'~S") ,~ p~vide a
pNdng scheme.~d propose me~o~ of mc~ng cemin cu~onmea~l
reqa~cm~m. In ~difio~ ~e ~P wiU ~te ~t ~e ~S selected pmu~ m .
~e ~P (~c "S~ec~d ~S") ~i~ ~ ~q~d m p~vidc cl~ciw to each
~li~ce mmber and e~h of~e non-all!anac cnfi~es ~e~cally identified m
~c ~P (co~ec~vcly, ~c ~'P~i~p~'). P~cipa~ou N ~c ~ does not
m~ a P~i~p~t a mcm~ of~c ~ec but does ~iow the P~cip~
share in ~e benefits of ~e ~.
· la or~r to ~cipatc ~ ~ ~P, a ~m~W should previo~ly
ai~fied ~ ~t~t m p~pate ~d su~Ued ~e Dep~t of ~v~onm~
wi~ a list of Co~oaw~ E~son ~co~, copi~ of Co~onwe~
E~son b~s for c~cn~r year 1999 ~ ~e ~es ~d s~et a~aaes of
~dli~cs ~ be sc~ed.
To con~e to p~eipate N ~e proem, a c~n!~ s~d now (i)
~ke ~y lcgisN~vc action ~ N ncc~s~ in or~ ~ a) e~ecute ~ a~eement
~or ~e p~c of el~ci~ (~mis~mt wi~ ~ ~m n~o~tcd by ~c
AU~cc ~ ~e Sel~ted ~S), b)'ai~ ~e fo~ ~c le~ ~ch
~owl~gcs ~t the ~liancc im~ t6~e yo~ co~,niw
~ ~fiW ~t ~1 ~c elee~clty ~om ~e ael~ed ~S, ~ e) execute ~e
. It is ~ to yo~ leg~ s~m det~iue wh~ ~y l~sl~v~
~qn~ed ~ or~ to e~ out ~e ~om se~ fo~ above. For yo~ couvenieuce,
we ~ve prep~ a ~le or--ce. It ~ll ~ed ~ ~ revi~ed byyo~ leg~
s~ ~d m~ ~ n~essa~. ~e staple ore--ce ~ well ~ ~a ~o~
~s~e le~r ~ eon~dm~ity a~e~e~t were ~but~ at ~e
All the above documents mtmt be returned,to the Cotmeil of Government
of which the municipality is a member by Friday, July 7t~. Also, plebe
carefully review the RFP. If your commuaity has contract pro,A~ions different
from or over and above those/ncludefl/n the RFP, please forward them m us as
soon as possible so we can determine whether, and in what m~Bner, to
incorporate them in the RFP. Also, if a commurd~ is aware of any special
ckcumstanees or arrangements with current electrical service providers, they
should be noted and seat with the agreement package.
In order to expedite coram;miearions, it is requested tha, questions ora
general nature be directed to the Executive Directors of the respective Councils
of Governmeats. Questions which relale to the/ndividual anomalies of
communities can be directed to:
Steve Walter
.~ssistant Commissioner
Dep~au~iem of. Environment
30 No~ L~al~ S~ee,
CMc~o, ~ 60602
312-7~8~I
swal~ci.chL~us
Your l~ai smffmay direr qu~ons ora l~al na~are to:
~Dol~sky
Ass~t Colorlon Co~el
De, mat of ~w
.. 121 No~ ~e S=eet
CNeago, ~ 60602
312~213
you.
Rim I~ Athns
· Director.of Regional Program~
09:04a~ From-OFFICE OF THE MAYOR +312744~324 T-348 P.OOZ/O03 F-333
Township corffact Number :ax Data
1 NorlA~rook Jim Nov~n~0n -- 847-272-5050 84.7,7272-9760 y
~ Des Plaines Jim Egabem 847-391-5328 .. ¥ y
3JHkq. bland Park Timothy W~bercj 847-432-0800 ~v y
4 Schaumburg jBrlan Townsend 347-895-4.500 847-486-9508 y y
5; Rolling Meadows William Barlow :847-394-850D 847-394-8710 y ¥ _
6 Brookfield James Mann 708-485-7344 708-485-9508. y -. y
71 Prospect Heights ;Gregory Con<~e [ ~7-398.6070 847-392-4244 ¥ y
8 Northlake M chael Cushion ?06-3~.;3-8700 708-343-8{338 i¥ Y
9 Northfleld V'wian Perenchio. 54-7-446-9200 84.7-446-4670 y .
10 Rosemont John Hochste~er 347-825-4408 847-696-2717 ~y y -.
11 Glenview Paul McCarthy ~7-724-17Q_0 547-724-4232 y
12 Countryside Cad LeGant 70&-354-7270 708-354-8445 [y y ..
~'13Park Ridqe T n..S.cnuenke 547-318-5200 84-?-31.,8-5300 ~/ ~ y
t4 NW Water Corem }avid Van Vooren _847-635-0777 :847-635-9244 Y v
15 Forest View :ranl~ Yuma .... ?08-749-0310 708-788-8266 y v
16 Harwood Hei,qhts Ray Willis .... 708-867-7200 ?08-867-3038 ¥ y
17 Lake Barrington John Remdl B47-381-6010 :347-381~8557. y ....y
18 No~clge Ear:l..Field 708-453-0800 ?08-458~9335 ¥ y
_19 Hoffman Estates Jam~s Nome B47-882-9100 ~47-582-2621 v y -
2,0.. Darien RobRoqecs 630-687-0008 ~0- ........ y y
21 Wilmington Cheryl Roach 815-476-2175 3!5-476-2278 y
22 Mc Prospect Gerald Farley ..... 847-392-6000 ~,7-392-6022 y y
23 Fox River Grove Art Osten.. 847~_3.9-3170 1 547-639-9876 ¥ y
24 E~rookfield Ja.m..es Mann 708-485-73441 7.08_485_9508 y
25 Wilmette Timothy Frenzer 847-251-2700 ~,7-853-7700 y ¥
26 Cicero William Dunn 7o8.656;3§Qo 706-656-58Ol y iy ....
27 ~uffalo Grove Bill Bolhncjer ...... /~.7-4,59-2518 547-459,7906 y y
28 Elk Grove V~l acJe. HIIda Inqebricgsen 84.7-439-3900 547-35,7-4044
29 Bartlet~ v..aLe, ne Salmons 6'30.837-0800 6.30-837-7168 y
30 Rosalie Pam Fmqolah §30-98~2000 630-980-8558 y
y
31 Western Sprinqs .. William Nelson r08-246-1800 70~246-0254 y
32 Skolde Keith Gla~z 847-673-0580 847-673-0525 y y
33 Elmwood Park John Dal~cand~o 708-452-7300 705. y_.
34 River Forest Charles Bionclo 708,-366-8500 708-366-3702 y ~ .....
35 NW Joint Water Joe. Fenne 847-981-4083 847-981-4085 y
36 Oak. Pail( ..... Joseph Eueliude 708-383-6400 708383-6692 y y -
37 LaGranqe ,. LOU, C~pparrone 788-5?9-2300 708-579-0980 7 Y
38 Sou[h Chica.qo Heights paul Pet,e.i'son 708-755-1880 7..08-755-1881 ¥
39 Mokena Louis ~ .bar, 708-4793927 y
40 iMidlothian Thomas Murawski ?06-389-0200 708-389,025,5
41 Riverside V~llafle <athleen Rush ?08-447-2700 708-44,7-2704
42 INew Lennox Pon Sly 5!5-485-6452 ~ y
43 Streamwoo~ Park Dist~ Pachard Pyre B30-372-7275 630-3~2-7284 y y
44 Lvnwood ... IBob Myers ,., 708-758~3~ r06-758-7044 y. y
Og:O4am From-OFFICE OF THE ~YOR +3127442324 T-345 P.OO3/O0~ F-333
4S :rani(lin Park John Canzoneri 847-671-4800 847-671~7806 y
4~ ForeSt Park John Calderone i708-366-2323 708-771-0177 ~, y ,
47 Solid waste - N. Cook ~. Broolce Baal B47-296-9205 847-296-9207 ~, y ..
48 Glanced Robe~ Hogue 847-835-4111 ~147-835-4234
49 Morton Grove David Erb 847-663-6103 847-965-4162
50 Soum Barrincjton David P~erce 847-381-7510 8~-7-381-0024 y Y
Sl Steaer Lou~sSherman 708'754-3395 708-754-1913 y
52 ,Flossmoor pecjqy Glassford 708-798-2300 708-798-4016 y
53 Calume~ City Jerry Geneva i708-891-8105 ¥ ...
54 Matteson Ma~/Bntton 708-283-4900 708-748-5196
55 Homewoocl [3avid Niemeyer '08-206-337§
56 Hazel Cres~ [eDert Palmer '08-335-9600 '08-335'9622
57 Hillside John Flood 708-202-~324 708-236-5110 ¥ y
58 Chicago Heights An,q, elo C[amDrone 70s-756-631,5 y
59 Harvey Nickolas Groves 708-210-5331
60 Calumet Pa~'k BUster Porch ~'08,388-.5072 ~08-389-gg25 y
61 Robblns Beved¥ Gavin 708-385-8940 708-385-8949 y
62 Bardn,qton Robert Irvin 847-842-5025 84-7-381-7506 y
63 Tinley Par~ Kez3neti3 CwOClz~nski =708-444-55G0 708-444-5099 Y
Letters of Inte~'estt ~ut no Data:
Hanover Park Marc Hummell 530-372~200 530-372-4.215
Gra~slake Darrell Blenniss 1~47-223-8515 B47-223-4821
Llncolnwood ~ober[ Bocwinski 847-745-4712 847-673-9382
'Jncolnshire Roher~ I~v~n 847-883-8600 8~7-883-8608
-- Glenview Paul McCarthe¥ 847-724-1700 947-724-1518
MAYOR
Gerald L, Farley ~
TRUSTEES ~
Timothy J. Corcoran Phone: (847) 392-6000
Paul Wm. Hoefert Fax: (847) 392-6022
Richard U. Lohrstoder TDD: (847) 392-6064
Dennis G. Prikkel
Michaele W. Skowron
Irvana K. Wilks
VILLAGE MANAGER
MichaelE. Janonis Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE CLERK
VelmaW. Lowe 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Local Government Electric Power Alliance
c/o City of Chicago Department of Environment
30 North LaSalle Street, 25th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Attn: Steven Walter, Assistant Commissioner
Dear Mr. Walter:
We understand that the Local Government Electric Power Alliance (the "Alliance")
intends to (but does not commit to) issue a Request for Proposals for electric supply
service (the "RFP"). Please consider this letter as the Village of Mount Prospect
("Participant") acknowledging:
(i) the Alliance's intention to name Participant in the RFP as an entity that will
purchase electricity from the electric utility or alternative electric retail
supplier that the Alliance selects pursuant to the RFP (the "Selected
RES");
(ii) that Participant will provide the Alliance with requested information relating
to Participant's anticipated usage of electricity;
(iii) that Participant's electric purchases from the Selected RES will be
counted toward the usage levels used to determine the price of electricity
to entities purchasing electricity from the Selected RES under agreements
entered into pursuant to the RFP; and
(iv) Participant's participation in the RFP or in any resulting agreement does
not make Participant a "member" of the Alliance.
Per your request, we have enclosed our executed confidentiality affidavit. Please
contact at if you have any questions or
comments.
Sincerely yours,
GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLEY
Mayor
GLF/rcc
vwl
6/14/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND CHICAGO ALLIANCE
FOR THE PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC POWER
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect (the "Municipality'") expends a significant amount of
funds in the purchase of electricity; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality would benefit from obtaining lower prices for its purchases of
electricity; and
WHEREAS, the Local Government Electdc Power Alliance (the "Alliance"), an Illinois not- for-
profit corporation, whose members include the City of Chicago, Chicago Park District, Chicago
Transit Authority, City Colleges of Chicago and Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees
(collectively, the "Alliance Members"), intends to issue a request for proposals for the purchase
of electric supply service (the "RFP") by some or all Alliance Members and other governmental
entities identified in the RFP (collectively, the "Participants"); and
WHEREAS, the Participants will be required to purchase electricity from the electric utility or the
alternative electric retail supplier selected by the Alliance pursuant to the RFP (the "Selected
RES"); and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that each Participant that purchases electricity using a contract
between it and the Selec{ed RES, that is entered into pursuant to the RFP, will be able to obtain
more competitive prices for its purchases than if it separately negotiated a purchase pdca; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality has determined that it would be beneficial to be a Participant; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality is a home rule unit of government by virtue of the provisions of the
Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970, and as such, may exercise any power and perform
any function pertaining to its government and affairs.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The foregoing recitals are incorporated as if fully set forth here.
SECTION TWO: The Village PresidentJMayor (the "Authorized Individual") is authorized to
sign a letter acknowledging that (i) the Alliance intends to name the Municipality in the RFP as
an entity that will purchase electricity from the Selected RES, (ii) the Municipality will provide the
Alliance with requested information relating to its anticipated usage of electricity, and (iii) any of
Page 2/5
Page 2/5
Electdc power
the Municipality's electric purchases from the Selected RES will be counted toward the usage
levels used to determine the price of electricity to Participants purchasing electricity from the
Selected RES under agreements entered into pursuant to the RFP.
SECTION THREE: In order to preserve the integrity of the RFP procurement process, the
Authorized Individual is authorized to execute a confidentiality affidavit in substantially the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION FOUR: The Authorized Individual is authorized (a) to provide the Alliance with
information it requests relating to the Municipality's anticipated usage of electricity and (b) to
enter into an agreement with the Selected RES to purchase electric power (the "Agreement"),
under terms consistent with those negotiated by the Alliance with the Selected RES. The
Authorized Individual also is authorized to execute such agreements and documents, and
perform any and all acts on behalf of the Municipality as may be necessary or advisable to
effectuate the Agreement, subject to the approval as to form and legality of the
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Page 3/5
Electric power
EXHIBIT A
CONFIDENTIALITY AFFIDAVIT
This confidentiality affidavit ("Affidavit") is executed this day of 2000 by
, (the "Party").
1. The Local Government Electric Power Alliance (the "Alliance") intends to (but
does not commit to) issue a request for proposals for electric supply service
("RFP") and enter into an agreement pursuant to that RFP (the "Electric Supply
Service Program"). During the development of the RFP, and pdor to, during, and
after the review, evaluation, selection and negotiation of proposals and all
subsequent phases of the Electric Supply Service Program, the Party agrees that
all Information (as described below) is property of the Alliance and is confidential
except as specifically authorized in this Affidavit or as may be required by law.
The Party must not allow the Information to be made available to any other
individual or organization without the prior written consent of the Alliance.
The Party must implement any measures that are necessary to ensure that its
employees, elected officials, representatives, agents and consultants that have
access to any information are bound by the confidentiality previsions contained in
this Affidavit.
2. For purposes of this Affidavit, information means:
A. Any proposals, exhibits, documents, data, charts, and other information,
of any kind or nature, submitted to the Alliance (or to the Party in
anticipation of such information being submitted to the Alliance) by any
person or entity whatsoever, including without limitation any electric utility
or Alternative Electric Retail Suppliers, as defined in SECTION 16-102 of
Illinois Public Act 90-561 (collectively, "RES"), contractor or consultant, or
prepared by or assembled by the Alliance and/or any of its consultants or
contractors, relating to any aspect of the Electric Supply Service Program,
and encountered by the Party in any way whatsoever; and
B. Any data of whatever kind or nature, including without limitation any
notes, work product, charts, graphs, evaluation sheets, numerical ratings,
and grades, in any form whatsoever, prepared or encountered by the
Party or acquired by the Party during its participation in any aspect of
Electric Supply Service Program, and relating to the evaluation of
proposals and/or negotiation of term sheets, agreements or any terms
thereof or relating to matters of whatever nature pertaining to the Electric
Supply Service Program; and
Page 4/5
Electric power
C. Any statements or communications, whether oral or written, relating to the
evaluation of the materials referred to in paragraph (A) above or the
negotiation of term sheets, agreements or terms thereof or the materials
referred to in paragraph (B) above pertaining to the Electric Supply
Service Program, and encountered by the Party, whether in telephone
calls, meetings, discussions, negotiations, oral presentations or
otherwise.
3. The Party must maintain, while in the Party's possession and/or control, the
information in such a way as to assure confidentiality, subject to the exceptions
set forth in SECTIONS V and VI below. The Party understands that the
dissemination of Information may jeopardize the integrity of the entire
procurement process and that the RFP process may be terminated if a violation
of confidentiality occurs. Therefore, the Party agrees to cooperate in and commit
itself to preserving the confidentiality of the process and all information as
described herein.
4. The Party must not issue any publicity news releases or grant press interviews
regarding the Electdc Supply Service Program without the prior wdtten consent
of a board member of the Alliance, or his/her duly authorized designee.
5. If the Party is presented with a request for documents by an administrative
agency, or with a subpoena duces tecum regarding any records, data or
documents which may be in the Party's possession, by reason of services
performed or any other involvement with the Electric Supply Service Program,
the Party must immediately give notice to the Alliance with the understanding that
the Alliance will have the opportunity to contest such process by any means
available to it, before the records or documents are submitted to a court or other
third party. The Party, however, is not obligated to withhold the delivery beyond
the time ordered by the court or administrative agency, unless the subpoena or
request is quashed or the time to produce is otherwise extended.
6. A. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Party will not be prohibited from
disciosing or participating in the disclosure of any Information to the
extent (i) disclosure is required by law or legal process with the
understanding that the Alliance will have the opportunity to contest such
required disclosure by any means available to it in accordance with
SECTION V above; (ii) such Information is generally available to the
public, other than as a result of a disclosure prohibited hereby; (iii) that it
is required to be disclosed in connection with any suit, action or
proceeding in connection with the enforcement of rights by the Party or
any other participant in the RFP or any agreements executed in
connection with it; (iv) such Information is disclosed pursuant to the pdor
written authorization of the Alliance; or (v) that the information is related
to how the type of transaction is generally structured but not information
related specifically to the Electric Supply Service Program.
Page 5/5
Electric power
B. In addition to the foregoing, nothing in this Affidavit will preclude the Party
from communicating (either by telephone or personal meeting) with any
RES that has been selected by the Alliance, provided that the
following occurs before such communication is initiated:
(1) the Party provides the Alliance with reasonable advance notice of the
meeting or telephone conference, the opportunity to participate in it, and a
description of the matters to be discussed during the meeting or
telephone call;
(2) if the Alliance elects not to participate in the communication, the Party
obtains the prior approval of the Alliance for the Party to engage in the
meeting or telephone conference and submits written confirmation of
such pdor approval to the Alliance by e-mail or facsimile prior to engaging
in the communication;
(3) the Party does not disclose any Information to the RES except for
la) Information that is part of such RES's proposal, or
lb) Information that may be disclosed under paragraph VI hereof,
but only elicits information from the RES, and
(4) if the Alliance elects not to participate in the communication, the Party
promptly after the meeting or telephone conference shares the
information with the Alliance.
C. This Afl[davit is executed for the sole benefit of the Alliance and does not
create rights in any other party.
SIGNED at
, Illinois:
(the Party)
By:
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,2000
Notary Public
My Commission expires: (SEAL)
vwl
6/6/00
6/12/00
6/13/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II ENTITLED "RULES OF ORDER"
OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Section 2.201 of Article II of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be
further amended by adding a new Section 2.201.1 entitled "Consent Agenda" to be and
read as follows:
"2.20'1.1: CONSENT AGENDA:
A. The Village Manager may submit to the President and Board of Trustees, not
less than three (3) days prior to the date of the meeting, a separate Consent
Agenda to be considered by the President and Board of Trustees immediately
after "Old Business" and before "New Business."
B. The Consent Agenda shall contain all matters deemed by the Village Manager to
be non-controversial in nature. The Village Manager, in his or her discretion,
may include on the Consent Agenda all matters on which a preliminary vote or
recommendation has been taken by the Village Board, subject to the drafting of
an ordinance or resolution. The Manager may also include on the Consent
Agenda resolutions, ordinances or motions, accepting plats of subdivision and
appointments and reappointments for boards or commissions, together with all
other matters that the Manager deems appropriate for a Consent Agenda.
C. The Consent Agenda may be adopted by a roll call vote and the roll call shall be
recorded in the minutes of the Village board as approving each item contained on
the Consent Agenda. The motion to adopt the Consent Agenda shall be non-
debatable. Any item may be removed from the Consent Agenda at the Village
Board meeting at the request of any one Trustee or Village President, in which
case the item shall be considered separately.
D. The taking of a single vote on the Consent Agenda shall be deemed sufficient
compliance with all requirements of law, as if the vote had been taken separately
by nays and ayes on the question of each ordinance, resolution and motion
included on the Consent Agenda. In the event one or more Trustees wishes to
Page 2/2
Consent Agenda
be recorded as passing or voting against any item included in the Consent
Agenda, that Trustee shall so notify the Village Clerk who will make an
appropriate reference in the minutes to record such negative votes."
SECTION TWO: Paragraph C of Section 2.202 entitled "Order of Business; Regular
Meetings Only" of Chapter 2 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further
amended by deleting Section 2.202.C in its entirety, and replacing Section 2.202.C with
the following item, so that hereinafter said section shall be and read as follows:
"C. The written agenda shall set forth the order of business substantially as follows:
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Pledge of Allegiance
5. Approval of minutes of previous regular meetings and special meetings,
if any.
6. Approval of Bills and Monthly Financial Report
7. Mayor's Report
8. Communications and Petitions - Citizens to be Heard
9. Old Business
10. ~
11. ~ ~ - ~ . .
12. New Business
13. Village Manager's Report
14. Any Other Business (including items for information only)
15. Adjoumment."
Page 3/3
Ch. 2, Consent Agenda
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law,
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Fadey
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
~0¢M°unt Pr°$Pect Public W°rk$ DePartment INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: FORESTRY/GROUNDS SUPERINTENDENT
DATE: JUNE 13, 2000
SUBJECT: BID RESULTS - MC DONALD CREEK CLEANING/TREE WORK
BACKGROUND
In the 2000 budget, funds have been appropriated to continue the ongoing cleanup of
Mount Prospect waterways. This year McDonald Creek has been chosen for cleanup.
Each year since 1997 we have been hiring a contractor to remove garbage and other
debris from the bed and banks of the creeks, remove dead trees, and prune dead limbs
over 6" in diameter. The first area we propose to complete tkis year extends from
Burning Bush Lane and runs southeasterly to Kensington Road (Section One on attached
map). We then expect to continue cleanup from the Mount Prospect/Prospect Heights
corporate limits southeasterly towards the Wolf Road/Euclid Avenue intersection
(Section Two on attached map), until available funds are depleted.
BID RESULTS
Sealed bids for this year's contract were opened on June 6, 2000. Nine invitational bids
were mailed and a bid notice was placed in the local paper. One bid and one "no bid"
letter was received. Contractors were asked to submit lump sum prices for all labor and
equipment required to perform the specified work.
Bid results were as follows:
B. Haney & Sons Bartlett Tree Experts
Cost to complete required
work in each 50' segment $787.00 No Bid
We called several tree care companies after the bid opening to question why they did not
bid. All responded that due to the recent storm, they were so overwhelmed with work,
they were not able to bid.
Please note, however, that this year's bid is significantly lower than last year's. In 1999
the cost to complete each 50' segment of Weller Creek was $1475.00.
ISCUSSION
The low bidder, B.Haney and Sons, has been in business for many years. Haney
successfully completed our 1998 and 1999 contract for Creek Cleaning/Tree Work.
BID RECOMMENDATION
I recommend award of a contract to B. Haney and Sons in an amount not to exceed
$50,000.00. Funds are available in Account #5907704-690079 on page 287 of the 2000
Budget.
I concur: ~z~~A Directo/'of Pubic Works
C. Cable Production Coordinator Ross Rowe
X:FILES/FORESTRY/WORD/2000/B 1DRSLT-CRK.DOC
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ~ cet~ u~a
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & BUILDINGS
DATE: JUNE 14, 2000
SUBJECT: SEALED BID RESULTS FOR PAVEMENT MARKING 2000
BACKGROUND
Annually a contract is let to repaint crosswalks, centerlines, lane dividing lines; parking stalls and
stop bars throughout the village. The village is divided into north and south sections by Central
Road. These areas are serviced every other year, with the exception of the downtown area and
parking lots, which are done annually. On the State Highways we are only responsible for
painting of some of the crosswalks and stop bars. Pavement markings usually require repainting
and installation of glass beading to maintain their reflectivity after two years of street sweeping,
plowing, fading in the sun, and being worn down due to traffic movements.
BID RESULTS
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. on June t3, 2000 for the proposed contract to install
pavement markings. The pavements marking work contemplated this year will be for all areas
north of Central Road, the downtown business district, Wolf Road, and State Highways. Six
invitational bids were mailed, and a bid notice was placed in the local paper.
Three bids were received, and bid results are as follows:
Bidder Bid Price
Preform Traffic Control System, LTD. $37,122.99
Marking Specialists Corp. $42,321.40
AC Pavement Striping Co. $69,684.27
X:\U SERS~PBUR~S\WORD~STR EET~TRPNG2000REC. DOC
age two
Pavement Marking Bid Results
June 14, 2000
DISCUSSION
Preform Traffic Control Systems, LTD. performed Mount Prospect's pavement marking contract
in 1996, 1997, 1998 & 1999 and completed the work successfully. All references checked out
satisfactorily and are, therefore, considered the low qualified bidder.
The bids received were based on estimated quantities, which will be adjusted so the total
expenditure does not exceed the budgeted amount. Funds for this proposed contract are in the
current budget on page 208, account no. 0505104-540535, in the amount of $25,000.00 and on
page 214, account no. 6305111-540565, in the amount of $6,200.00. Total budgeted amount for
2000 is $31,200.00.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by Preform Traffic Control Systems, Ltd.
for an amount not to exceed $31,200.00.
Paul Bures
Superintendent of Streets & Buildings
I concur:
Director of Public Works
PB/pb
c: Director of Public Works Glen Andler
Deputy Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey
file
X :\US ERS~PBURES\WORDXSTREET~STRPNG2000REC .DOC 2
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
DAVE STRAHL, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MIS COORDINATOR
DATE: JUNE 15, 2000
SUBJECT: NETVVORK OPERATING SYSTEM UPGRADES AND NETVVORK
MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Novell's NetWare 4.11 is the network operating system (NOS) that the Village is currently
using on four LAN (local area network) servers to provide file and print services to Village
network users. The Village has planned to upgrade the network operating system in 2000
and to purchase network management software to help manage network user accounts.
This is a recommendation to purchase Novell NetWare 5.1 upgrades for the network
operating system and to pumhase Novell ZENworks for Desktops 2 as the network
management software. This memo will explain the reasons for choosing Novell for the
operating system and for the network management software, and the cost involved.
Decision-makinq Factors
There was a great deal of discussion among the network administrators about whether to
upgrade to NetWare 5.1 or to switch to Microsoft Windows NT Server or Windows 2000
Server. In the end the reasons to stay with NetWare outweighed to reasons to switch. The
advantages of each are listed below.
Pre Microsoft
1. A Microsoft NOS would provide better integration with the Microsoft desktop
operating systems.
2. The wodd seems to be migrating toward Microsoft.
3. All special-use servers we have are already running Microsoft Windows NT
Server (SCl, GIS, Exchange, and the web server). The Village could
standardize on a single platform.
4. A Microsoft NOS would provide better integration with Internet standards.
Network Operating System Upgrades and Network Management Software
June 15, 2000
Page 2
Pro Novell
1. With NetWare, the servers can be upgraded in place. To switch to Microsoft, an
additional server would be needed during the migration of each server.
2. Migrating user accounts from Novell to Microsoft is a major undertaking and
would cause a great deal of turmoil. Microsoft's new Active Directory Services
has been developed to compete with Novell's NDS (NetWare Directory Services)
to provide organization and structure to the network setup. Since Active
Directory Services is in its infancy, months of planning and possibly outside help
would be needed to set it up properly.
3. Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Server is being phased out and Microsoft Windows
2000 Server is too new. Until Windows 2000 Server has had time to prove itself,
it's not a good time to change.
4. Some of the existing software would need to be replaced to run on Microsoft,
such as Backup Exec and Oracle.
5. There is a smaller learning curve with NetWare since all the network
administrators are already using it for file and pdnt services.
6. NetWare is historically more stable.
7. There is no real reason to switch.
Network Manaqement Software
Which network management software to use is dependent on which operating system is
chosen. Microsoft SMS (Systems Management Server) works with Microsoft servers and
Novell's ZENworks teams up with NetWare. The services they provide are comparable,
providing the capability to deploy applications and manage workstation profiles from a
central location. ZENworks for Desktops 2 is the current Novell version.
Cost
The components of the requested software packages include server upgrades, media kits
and client licenses. Currently the Village has 225 NetWare client licenses divided between
the four NetWare servers. In addition to standard PC client connections, licenses are
taken up by network printers and software (such as Backup Exec and UPS software).
Additionally, extra licenses are required when a user maps to a drive on another server,
which has been a problem when users access the Village's computer training materials
that are sitting on the Fire Department's server. Currently some users are getting locked
out of the network because them am not enough licenses. For the reason, the fifty
additional licenses are included in the quotes in Table 1.
Currently the Fire Department has the only server using ZENworks and they are using an
older version. The quote for ZENworks includes upgrades to the 25 existing licenses, 200
additional licenses, plus four media kits.
etwork Operating System Upgrades and Network Management Software
June 15, 2000
Page 3
Novell offere a Master License Agreement (MLA) that packages the software, and upgrade
insurance in one package with government pricing. The package also includes a
subscription to Novell's Support Connection CDs, one electrenic support incident per year,
and discounts on training. The pregram has an annual maintenance fee of $7612,50/year.
The Master License Agreement provides support and maintenance that we currently do
not have and, if we upgrade every four years, costs about the same in the long run.
However, it also commits the Village to sticking NetWare for future upgrades as well.
When it is time to upgrade the network operating system again, there might be more
compelling reasons to switch to Microsoft. To keep future options open, I recommend that
we do not enter into such a contract.
Table I
Price Comparison for NetWa~re~ ,,Upgrades
CDW Micro Warehouse Novell Novell's MIA
................................
NetWare Upgrade 17102 17270 21476
~EN~orks Ne~ork Mgmt 10108 16980 12685 6068
$26,924 $34,082 $29,955 $27,544*
*There is an additional $7612.50/year maintenance feel.
As show in Table 1, CDW's quote is the lowest. However, there is a $600 rebate available
if we purchase directly from Novell before June 30th. The least expensive solution would
be to pumhase the four server licenses from Novell for at a price not to exceed $2,200 and
to purchase the remaining components from CDW at a price not to exceed $24,820.
Funds for these purchases are available in account number 0011104-540945.
I recommend that the Village Board approve an expenditure of $27,020 to upgrade our
Novell NetWare 4.11 to NetWare 5.1 and to purchase ZENworks for Desktops 2. If you
have any questions or input, feel free to contact me at extension 5272.
oan Middleton
MIS Coordinator
\\Vf-~V0 I\USERS~JMID D LET~ ETADMIN~OS upgrades,doc
MAYOR
Gerald L, Farley VILLAGE MANAGER
Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES
TimothyJ. CorcoranpaulWm. Hocfert
Village of Mount Prospect
Richard M. Lohrstor fer
Dennis G. Prikkel Community Development Department Phone: 847/818-5328
Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/818-5329
Irvana K. Wilks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 T~D: 847/392-6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
Senior Center Thursday
50 South Emerson Street June 22, 2000
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 7:30 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of May 25, 2000 1. ZBA-15-2000 / Solan Residence / 305 N. Catino Ct.
2. ZBA 17-2000 / Karner Residence / 610 S. Carol Lane
3. ZBA-18-2000 / United Airlines, Inc. / 1610 W. Algonquin Road
4. ZBA-19-2000 / Ortman Residence / 503 S. Main Street
iV. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA-08-00 / Text Amendments to the Zoning Code Section 14.1702 and 14.311.
B. ZBA-13-00 / Text Amendment to Section 14.2219 of the Zoning Ordinance.
C. ZBA-16-2000 / Grippo Residence / 1104 S. Church Rd. / Variation to permit construction
ora pool that would enroch 8' into rear setback and 10' into side setback.
Note: These items were postponed from previous meetings and are all Village Board
Final
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA-20-2000 / Siavelis Residence / 802 S. William St. / Variation to construct a garage
in the side setback. NOTE: This Case is Village Board Final
B. ZBA-21-2000 / Road Runner / 2400 Terminal Drive / Amend Conditional Use for a
cartage facility. NOTE: This Case is Village Board Final
VI. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation
to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect,
IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
C:\TMP\6-22-2000.doc
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-15-2000 Hearing Date: May 25, 2000
PETITIONER: Wayne & Kathlecn Solan
305 N. Catino Court
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 2000 DAILYHERALD
REQUEST: Variation to permit the construction of a 6' tall fence, which exceeds the
Zoning Code maximum height of 5'
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF M~EMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Wayne and Kathleen Solan
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 7:35 Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-15-2000, a request
for a Variation to permit the construction of a 6' tall fence, which exceeds the Zoning Code maximum height of 5'
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the ease, stating that notice had been provided in the form of a newspaper ad,
mailed notices, and a sign on the subject property. He indicated this request was for replacement of a 6' wood fence
on the rear property line of the subject property. He stated that the rear of the lot abuts the parking lot of a four-story
condominium building and that the Zoning Code permits a 6' fence where a residential use abuts a non-residential use,
but not where a single-family residential use abuts a multi-family residential use.
Mr. Perkins described the petitioners' rationale for the Variation - that the high elevation of their house, relative to the
fence and parking lot, allows vehicle lights in the parking lot to shine into their windows and also that the house's
elevation limits the privacy provided by a 5' fence.
Mr. Perkins stated that the elevation change of the subject parcel exists and that it does meet the hardship standard set
in the Zoning Ordinance. Following a brief discussion of the project, in terms of Zoning Code standards for
Variations, Mr. Perkins gave Staff recemmendation of approval of the requested Variation and added that the Zoning
Board's decision is f'mal for this case.
Kathleen Solan was sworn in and testified they had inherited the property from her husband's parents, who did receive
a Variation for the original 6' wood fence, which was now in a state of disrepair. She said they wanted to replace the
fence with a sturdier, vinyl fence. Ms. Solan also stated she had a letter from the Westgate Condominium Board
president, stating they did not oppose the replacement of the 6' fence..
Ms. Juracek stated that this was a straightforward request for a 6' fence to replace an existing fence between residential
and multi-family dwellings. She asked Board members if they had questions.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 15-2000
Arlene Juraeek, Chairperson Page 2
Richard Rogers asked Ms. Solan if the proposed fence would be solid or slats. Ms. Solan said it would be slats.
There were no questions from the audience. Richard Rogers made a motion to grant approval for Case ZBA-15-2000,
a request for a Variation to permit the construction ora 6~ tall fence, which exceeds the Zoning Code maximum height
of 5'. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:40 p.m., after hearing four more cases, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers.
The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Community Development Deputy Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-17-2000 Hearing Date: May 25, 2000
PETITIONER: Michael & Kristen Kamer
610 S. Carol Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 2000 DAI£YHEtMLD
REQUEST: Variation to permit the construction of a fence approximately 3' inside the
west property line and 9' inside the south property line.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Michael & Kristen Kamer
Chairperson Arlene Juraeek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juraeek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 8:09, after hearing two other cases, Ms. Juracek introduced
Case ZBA-17-2000, a request for a Variation to permit the constmetion of a fence approximately 3' inside the west
property line and 9' inside the south property line.
Jeffe~y Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that mailed notices and a newspaper legal had been provided and
that a sign had been placed on the property. He indicated that the subject property is a house on an irregularly shaped
lot with a rear yard that is partially enclosed by fences on adjacent properties and with utility easements and facilities
along the side and rear lot lines. He described the applicant's proposal to finish enclosing the rear yard by building a 4'
wood picket fence 9' offthe rear lot line and 3' offa side lot line and stated that the Zoning Code requires fences to be
placed on property lines.
Mr. Perkins described the petitioner's contention that the frequent maintenance of the existing utility lines would
require removal and replacement of the fence whenever utility providers needed to service those lines. He also stated
that placing the fence on the property line would be impossible in some areas, due to the location of those existing
utility poles.
Mr. Perkins stated that the location of utility lines on the subject parcel is unlikely to change and presents some unique
difficulties for the property owners and discussed how those difficulties could be seen as a hardship. He added that
building the fence offthe property line may create maintenance problems in the areas between it and the property line.
He suggested that, if the ZBA would choose to grant the proposed Variation, it should include a condition that the
applicant provide a gate to provide aecess for maintenance of that area.
Based on positive f'mdings regarding Zoning Code Variation Standards, Mr. Perkins gave Staff's recommendation of
approval of the proposed Variation with the condition that the applicant include a gate. He stated that the ZBA
decision is f'mal for this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 17-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Arlene Juracek asked Mr. Perkins if he was proposing the gate be put in the south portion of the fence. Mr. Perkins
responded that it would be up to the petitioner where they wished to place the gate.
Richard Rogers asked if another condition of approval should be that a vegetable killer or stones be placed there to
avoid weeds.
Jeff Perkins said a large portion of this property is landscaped by the petitioner and they would want to maintain that
landscaping.
Arlene Juraeek asked Mr. Perkins which utilities were back there.
Mr. Perkins responded that Ameritech, Com Ed and cable television facilities were located in that area.
Richard Rogers asked if the utility pole was on the property line. Jeff Perkins said it was at the comer of the property.
Kristen and Michael Karner were sworn in and stated they had planned to include a gate at the south edge; their son
would need the gate to get through to school. They stated they would be maintaining the landscaping and in fact it
would be a picket fence that would quickly show any lack of maintenance. They stated it was a difficult area to mow
and that is why they put in a ground cover to keep it easy to maintain.
Ms. Juraeek said she had visited the area and did see that the petitioner's property is in a valley with the school and
other neighboring properties higher. She said she also noticed pre-existing fences of the neighbors are in line with
where there proposed fence would be. Ms. Juracek said the proposed fence location made sense.
Richard Rogers made a motion to grant approval for Case ZBA-17-2000, a request for a Variation to permit the
construction of a fence approximately 3~ inside the west property line and 9' inside the south property line with the
condition that a gate be included in the fence. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Zoning Board's decision is final in this case.
At 9:20 p.m., after hearing two more cases, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers.
The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
~ich~el Blue L
Community Development Deputy Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-18-2000 Hearing Date: May 25~ 2000
PETITIONER: United Airlines, Inc.
1600 W. Algonquin Rd.
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1610 W. Algonquin Rd.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 2000 D.4ILY HERALD
REQUEST: Map Amendment from R4 Multi-family Development to B3 Community
business and Conditioual approval to permit the establishment of a stand-
alone parking lot.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None'
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Langdon Neal
Jerome Siegan
Michael Sutton
Ted Wolff
Steve Hubbard
Shaylyn Mills
Michael Karcich
Chuck Minor
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 8:20, after hearing three other cases, Ms. Juracek
introduced Case ZBA-18-2000, a request for a Map Amendment from R4 Multi-family Development to B3
Community business, a Conditional Use, and Variations as may be required by the plan submitted, to permit the
establishment of a stand-alone parking lot.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices
sent to property owners within 250' of the subject property, and a sign placed on the property. He stated that the
subject propet~y consists of three R4 zoned parcels with a total area of five acres that formerly contained a multiple
family residential development. He informed the ZBA that United Air Lines is building an addition to their corporate
headquarters complex, which is adjacent to the property in unincorporated Cook County and has been the subject of
numerous annexation discussions with the Village. He added that the addition will increase the parking needed to
serve the complex and will also eliminate some existing parking spaces and that the applicant proposes to construct a
519-space stand-alone parking tot to allow for sufficient parking for the complex.
Mr. Perkins stated that to accommodate the proposed use, the property must be rezoned to B3 Community Business
and that a stand-alone parking lot is listed as a Conditional Use in the B3 district. He then described the property in
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA- 18-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
terms of the Village's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. He stated that the land use designations are advisory and
may be adjusted to react to changing circumstances and that. as the property is no longer a multi-family development
and is completely surrounded by commercial, industrial, and office uses, the proposed B3 zoning district is appropriate
for the location.
Mr. Perkins described the proposed facility and outlined how the design of the parking lot meets Zoning Code
requirements. He stated that no handicap spaces are shown in the proposed lot, but that the Zoning Code requires 11
handicap spaces. He added that the proposed lot is remote from buildings, so providing handicap spaces in the lot
would be inappropriate. He suggested that the applicant should provide for 11 additional handicap spaces in existing
lots at locations with the shortest accessible routes to entrances ..:
Mr. Perkins described the submitted landscape plan for the parking lot and stated that tl~e proposed plan meets all
Zoning Code landscape requirements.
Mr. Perkins then discussed the proposal in terms of Zoning Code Standards for Map Amendments and Conditional
Uses. Based on positive findings regarding those standards, he gave Staff's recommendation of approval of the
proposed Map Amendment and Conditional Use with the conditions identified in the staff report.
Ms. Juracek confirmed with Mr. Perkins that the Map Amendment does not go with the Conditional Use, that it is a
permanent Map Amendment regardless of the use of the property. Mr. Perkins said that was correct, the prope~,
would be hereafter zoned B3.
Langdon Neal was sworn in and testified that United will be consolidating the three parcels, which total five acres of
currently vacant and undeveloped property within the United Airlines campus complex. The plan will allow for 519
parking spaces, associated landscaping, with lighting and striping in conformance with Village Code and all
specifications of the Village. This will allow United Airlines to increase their overall parking capacity in their world
headquarters and allow for additional expansion in the campus for the proposed office use, which is located in
unincorporated Cook County.
Ms. Juracek asked if Mr. Neal ,,vas amenable to staffs condition to provide eleven handicapped spaces. Mr. Neal
responded yes, United agreed with that and ail other conditions recommended by staff.
Mr. Floros asked about United's expansion plans. He said he had read that United was moving corporate headquarters
to downtown Chicago. Mr. Neal said he would have Mr. Herb Gardner address that question.
Herb Gardner, Director of Public Affairs for United Airlines in the midwest, was swom in and testified United is
erecting a new building at their existing 140,000 square foot office complex. It will be to the west of their north
building. It is their new Operations Control Center, which is the heart of the airline. It is an operation that is staffed
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks of the year. They are required to have staff in the dispatch center anytime an
airplane takes-off anywhere around the world. It is being built as a stand-alone facility and will eliminate some of
their existing parking spaces.
Mr. Floros asked about their plans to annex to Mount Prospect. Mr. Gardner said he could not address that question at
this time. They would be discussing those plans in the future.
Ms. Juracek stated she had toured the facility twenty years ago and it was very impressive at that time. She asked
about security and lighting of the facility.
Mr. Gardner said the entire complex is fenced and locked. The only entry is from the Linneman Road entrance. It is
well lighted and employees can request security assistance in getting to their cars.
Richard Rogers asked about trees that are in the parking areas. He said he thought several 4-12 inch honey locust and
hawthorne trees could be saved just by making some changes to the parking islands.
oniug Board of Appeals ABA- 18-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
Ted Wolff. Wolff and Clements. was sworn in and testified the trees which were slated for removal consisted of field
grown trees, not nursery stock, and more ora type inappropriate for parking lots. He said th% are going to attempt to
save many of the trees but cannot guarantee their survival. \Vhile 37 trees will be removed, 136 new trees are being
proposed for a net gain of 99 trees.
Richard Rogers said he did applaud their efforts but thought that moving the islands to the east might preserve more
trees. Langdon Neal said they would take another look and do their best to preserve tile trees.
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval for Case ZBA-18-2000, a request for a Map Amendment t¥om R4
Multi-family Development to B3 Community business, a Conditional Use, and Variations as may be required b) the
plan submitted, to permit the establishment ora stand-alone parking lot. Richard Rogers seconded the motiou.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten. Floros, Luxem, Youngquist. Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:48 p.m., after hearing another case, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. Tile
motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Pl~.nning Secretary
Michael Blue
Community Development Deputy Director
M0000079
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-19-2000 Hearing Date: May 25, 2000
PETITIONER: Joseph Ortman
313 Bobby Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 503 S. Main St.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Conditional Use to permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-
car garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning District.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Joseph Ortman
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 8:40, after hearing four other cases, Ms, Juracek introduced
Case ZBA-19-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-car
garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning District.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper by mailed notice
and with a sign on the property. He indicated that the subject property has an existing home located on a 70' wide lot
on a residential street. He stated that the lot is developed with a residence, single-car detached garage and a driveway,
and that the petitioner proposes to demolish the house and construct a new two-story residence with an attached three-
car garage. He stated that the Zoning Code lists three-car garages as Conditional Uses in the RA district, whether they
are attached or detached. He added that the property and the proposed house and garage would meet all Zoning Code
bulk regulations.
Mr. Perkins stated that the lot for the proposed house and garage is 70' in width, which is consistent with the R1
Zoning district and that the R1 district lists three-car attached garages as permitted uses. He added that the Conditional
Use requirement for three-car garages in RA is to prevent construction of large garages on the 50' wide parcels
permitted in the district.
Following a brief discussion of the Zoning Code Standards for Conditional Uses and their application to the proposal,
he gave Staff's recommendation to approve the proposed Conditional Use, subject to the condition included in the staff
report. He informed the ZBA that the Village Board's decision is final for this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 19-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Richard Rogers verified with Mr. Perkins that, with a zoning of R-t. a 3-car garage would be allowed: Mr. Perkins
said yes, it would go right to the building permit process. He said the petitioner's site is in a neighborhood of 50' lots
and his property consists of I lot and 40% of the adjacent lot.
Joseph Ortman was sworn in and stated he has letters of approval from two neighbors and another neighbor is present
to speak on his behalf. He stated he is a widower with t~,o boys and will soon be married to a womao with three
children. He has lived in his home 24 years and wants to stay itl that neighborhood of Mount Prospect. With three
more children, one with a driving permit, he will need a larger garage and home.
Ms. Juracek said the size of tile lot would accommodate tile home and garage and tile plans were beautiful and
appropriate for the neighborhood She stated except but for tile zoning, there would be no problem ill approving this
garage. She said Mr. Ortman's request was entirely appropriate.
Mr. Ortman stated that the parkway trees would not be impacted by the plans. He said he does want to keep the trees.
Mr. Perkins said it appeared that the driveway would fit between tile existing trees. If there is a problem, the portion of
the driveway on the parkway could be narrower.
Leo Floros asked about Mr. Ortman's address on the petition - 313 Bobble Lane and asked if he didn't he live io the
Main Street house?
Mr. Ortman said he moved to that address temporarily to start building tile new house.
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for Case ZBA-19-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to
permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-car garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning
District. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALb: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:40 p.m., Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Michael B~ue
Community Development Deputy Director
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley -<kcu~ Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
Tiraothy $. Corcoran V¢lma Lowe
PaulWm..o fe. Village of Mount Prospect
Richard M. Lohrstorfer
Dermis G. Prikkel Community Development Department Phone: $47/392-6000
Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/392-6022
Irvana K. Wires 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD: 847/392-6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
2nd Floor Conference Room Wednesday
Village Hall June 21, 2000
100 South Emerson Street 7:00 p.m.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. June 14, 2000
IV. SUBDIVISIONS
None
V. OLD BUSINESS
None
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing
· Community Development Block Grant presentations by 2001 applicants
· Discussion of proposed 2000 Action Plan Amendment
B. Action on proposed 2000 Action Plan Amendment
C. Meeting start time
VII. COMMENTS/OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some
accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at
100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
June 14, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman
Michael Zadel at 7:02 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect,
Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Antoinette Astreides
Edwin Janus
William Reddy
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Frank Boege
Gary Grouwinkel
Village Staff Present: Judy Cormolly, AICP, Senior Planner
Chuck Lindelof, P.E., Project Engineer
Others in Attendance: Todd Tageson
Peter Balmes
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chairman Zadel opened the meeting and said that the minutes would be reviewed after the Development
Code exception request was heard. The Development Code case was completed and Chairman Zadel
revisited Approval of the Minutes. He asked if there were any questions or revisions. As there were none,
Carol Tortorello moved to approve the minutes and Bill Reddy seconded the motion. The motion was
approved with Tonic Astreides and Ed Janus abstaining.
suBDMsIONS:
NONE
OLD BUSINESS:
PC-05-2000/Development Code Exception/2 E. Rand Road (Shell Gas Station)
Chairman Zadel introduced the first item of business and asked Judy Connolly to review the case. Ms.
Connolly said that the petitioner, Shell Oil, proposes to improve an existing Shell Gas Station at the comer
of Rand and Kensington Roads. She said that the project includes removing the outdoor kiosk/attendant
box and eenstructing a 420 square foot addition onto the existing car wash to accomraodate the cashier and
a small amount of retail space. She said 'that the Development Code applies to the project because the
remodeled structure will have retail space, which requires two parking spaces. She said that the petitioner
is seeking an exception to the Development Code for storm water detention and proposes not to provide
storm water detention.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of June 14, 2000 Meeting Page 2
She said that currently there is no stormwater detention for the site and that the Village is not
aware of any drainage or flooding problems. The petitioner's plans include reducing the amount
of impervious surface to approximately 67% and installing landscaping around the per/meter of
the property. Ms. Connolly said that the property is bounded by two ][DOT roads and is required
to follow their regulations in addition to the Village's regulations. Furthermore, the size, shape,
and the fact that the site is a gas station imposes further constraints on viable locations for
stormwater detention. She said that the petitioner is not changing the tanks, gas pumps or the
canopy, which also limits the amount of flexibility in locating the detention. Therefore, the
permitted locations for the detention do not allow for sufficient capacity or the appropriate
manner to provide detention.
Ms. Connolly said that staff recommends approval of the petitioner's Development Code
exception request and not provide storm water detention with the condition that the landscape
plan be consistent with the Village's proposed Corridor Design Guideline requirements. She said
that Chuck Lindelof fi.om the Village's Engineering Division and representatives of the petitioner
were available to answer questions about the project.
Todd Tageson, representative of the petitioner, said that IDOT reviewed the reconfigured access
to the site. He presented the final design and said that the revised design approved by IDOT
reduced the amount of impervious surface to less than 65%.
There was general discussion about the amount of lot coverage and how the increase in green
space would significantly benefit the site. Chairman Zadel said that the mn-off fi.om the site
sheet drains into Rand Road and that he is not aware of any drainage problems at the site. Bill
Reddy agreed and asked if the new projects occurring around Rand/Kensington/Elmhurst Roads
were reviewed together. Chuck Lindelof said that the projects were reviewed separately for
detention requ'trements and Mr. Tageson added that ][DOT reviewed access to Shell and the
proposed CVS site, across the street, together to ensure optimal traffic flow and access to the
sites.
There was discussion about redeveloping a site as opposed to improving a site and how the
Village codes were applied. Matt Sledz compared the projects at 1 E. Rand Road and 1 W. Rand
Road to complete redevelopment projects because the existing structures were raised, in contrast
to Shell's improvement project, where primary structures were not changed but the project
significantly improved the property.
There was general discussion about the proposed retail space and what items would be sold; the
impact of the remodeling on the car wash stacking space, and access for the tanker trucks. Peter
Balmes said that the stacking and access issues were reviewed by Shell's intemaI design team
before they submitted plans to the Village. He said that Shell reviews plans to make sure the
tankers can access the site easily and to determine what, if any, impacts will result if the station is
remodeled.
There was further discussion about the project and how the petitioner had a legitimate hardship
because of the size and shape of the property and that the reduced amount of impervious surface
would be an asset to the site. Carol Tortorello moved to approve the Development Code
exception and not require the petitioner to provide stormwater detention for 2 E. Rand Road and
that the site be landscaped in a manner consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines.
Bill Reddy seconded the motion, which was approved 6-0.
OUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of June 14, 2000 Meeting Page 3
NEW BUSINESS:
NONE
C~)MMENTS AND OTIt~R BUSINESS:
There was general discussion about starting the Plan Commission meetings at 7 p.m. It was
agreed that the June 21 meeting would start at 7 p.m. because agencies and service groups would
be making presentations to obtain CDBG funds and that it would be easier for the presenters to
have an earlier start time, as opposed to a meeting that ran later. Plan Commission members
requested that meeting "start time" be a June 21, 2000 agenda item and formal action would be
taken at that time.
Bill Reddy moved to adjourn the meeting and Tonie Asterieds seconded the motion. The motion
carried 6-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m.
u ith hi ~e[olI~, A~CP ~
Senior Planner
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
Timothy J. Corcoran Velma Lowe
Paul Wm. Hoefert
ch dM. Lo orf Village of Mount Prospect
Dennis G. Prikkel Phone: 847/818-5328
Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/818-5329
kvana K. wi~ 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 T~D: 847/392-6064
NOTICE
THE MONDAY, JUNE 19, 2000 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS
BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT
MEETING.
Dated this 14th day of June, 2000.