The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4. OLD BUSINESS 6/19/07 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Mount Prospect MEMORANDUM ~ Be Mut;,~ ~ -l'l B TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 15,2007 SUBJECT: PZ-14-06 - MAP AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE (TOWNHOMES) 1040 W. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY JOHN CONRAD SCHIESS - APPLICANT The Petitioner presented plans at the May I, 2007 Village Board meeting to construct a IS-unit townhome development. The Petitioner was directed to meet with the neighbors and revise the plans to address concerns presented at the meeting. The case was deferred to June 19,2007 to allow adequate time'to prepare and review revised plans. The Petitioner revised the site plan and made changes to the elevations in response to comments made at the previous Village Board meetings and subsequent meetings with the neighbors. The attached revised plans call for: · Reducing the number of units to 14; . Relocating the cul-de-sac to the east lot line; and · Revised elevations. The Petitioner notes in the attached cover letter that the cul-de-sac dimensions have not been modified from the design previously approved by the Fire Department. Staff reviewed the proposal and did not object to the changes. However, the enclosed elevations reflect half of the '2-pack' and '4-pack' buildings; the half not shown is a mirror image of the elevation shown. It is not clear what the proposed materials consist of, and the elevations appear plain and lack architectural interest. Consequently, Staff requests the Petitioner prepare a material board and modify the elevations to include a variety of architectural elements and interest to the homes. Also, Staff recommends the Petitioner prepare a landscape plan that includes year-round landscaping that screens the bulb of the cul-de-sac. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their June 19,2007 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. ~~/~ ~l William J. Cooney, Jr., AICP Ijme H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2007\MEJ Memos\PZ~14-06 ME) MEMO REVlSED REVISED PLANS (1040 W NW HWY. townhome projcct).doc The office of John Conrad Schiess Architect 905 South Home Avenue Oak Park Illinois 60304 21 May 2007 Ms. Judith Connolly Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: 1040 W. Northwest Highway Dear Ms. Connolly, Per your request, attached please find 10 copies of the revised architectural plans for 1040 W. Northwest Highway to be included on the June 19, 2007 Village Board Agenda. The following lllodifications were applied to the atta~hed site plan: Eliminated one unit Increased setbacks along the East and West property lines Relocated cul-de-sac, all dimensions remain as previously approved by Fire Department The floor plans and elevations were revised to reflect the changes made on the site plan. I will also be forwarding you the files via email in PDF format. If you have any questions or concerns or require anything additional, please call our office to discuss. Thank You Received by: Date: 708.383.5822 Office · 708.383.5884 Fax ZONING ,DISTRICT: R.2 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT SIZE: 90.671.04 SFI2.08 ACRES LOT AREA PER UNIT: 6,476.5 SF UNITS PER ACRE: 6.7 PROPOSED NUMBER OF UNITS: 14 UNITS LOT COVERAGB: 43,863.14 SF: 48.4% PROPOSED GRBBNSPACB: 46,807.90 SF; 51.6% PROPOSED PLR AREA RATIO: 0.41 PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 28'-0" NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARKING: 28PRIVATBGARAGB 28 PRIVATBSPACBS 160UBST'PARKING PROPOSED SBT BACKS: BAST 33'.0" WEST 29'.9 3/4" NORTH 30-5718" SOUTH 3D''()'' Site Plan Scale: I" ~ 40' . 0" ~\:) M P H . S/Z.i101- aunt raspect ames The Office of John Conrad Schiess Arc h i t~~ 1040 W, Northwest Highway. Mount Prospect. Illinois 15 May 2007 Revised for Village Board Approva JCSA C ZOC SK DN." REM aEVAJ'ION TYPE 'A' IIIiAIt ~ATIOIl.I TYP1!'N 5meEUVATJON SCALE: 1/16"= 1'.0. TYPE'A'&IB' TOWNHOME ELEVATIONS LJdtJl GENERAL NOlel PRELIMINARY IN-PROGRES~ WINDOWS" DOl WCATION SVBJEC1 MODIFIED ON( ELEVATIONS AI FINALIZED m TYPE '8' 2ND FUr _ 1 02~ ~'A'2NDFUf_II~ l'YJIE'8' In......._1 I,6gaFt TfIlS '8' _ 1 1120 tlllttMMlt~ 222G1IfIItI:~ 2.845 IIIIItl.GM.& Ibmt ...~ i i: ami 'ec.of ~ ~~l ~~ ~. ~ 1Wt!'A'ISTPUt_1 ~ TfIIE 'A'_ 2990 ~ GaraIIIl 7.... ....._'n.- 1.205 with Gnr '" IIsmt SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0. TYPE'A'&'B' TOWNHOME FLOOR PLANS 11PE_'" MSEMENT - 65S5aFt ~ DESlGNSRIDGI ..........'m 14tSIVUlGIIiIIICIIMJIUf(NcA(;o,l T(l;)tl.41I;5MS FN,;311.41t.Y E.AMI.,,*~,co III ~ 1040 WEST NORTH\! HIGHWAY MOUNT PROSPECT. IU MOUNT PROSPEc: DEVELOPMENT GROlJ tIN W,MSMIRIT _'77OSaF1: TYPE 'A' & '8' TYPII PlANS & E~An ITlD~ ftOO7-r11l } LJJtJl GENERAL NOTES ~ELEVATJON 1\'PI!'C' ~~AnnN TYPE'C' TOWNHOME ELEVATIONS PRELlMlNARl IN.PROGREli WINDOws & IX WCATION SUBJEC MODIFIED ON ELEVATIONS) FINALIZED & SCALE: 1/16"= 1'.0" ~ nPIE 'C' 2ND PlR _ I 01 HaPt 'IYI'I! 'C 1ST PUI - 1.705SqFt 'IYI'I!'C'-2.J50_-" 2.7SO_GlIrlIge 3.4IS_GrgIo_ In! ~C' MSDIENI' _ 69SSaPI TYPE'C' TOWNHOME FLOOR PLANS DESlGN8RIDG DESIliNIlIDl.if.UO. 14lS\1lfSl'GMhOIM!I<<If CHCAGo TU;3IU.zI.5115AAll.'112.41J. l-MM'~, IJiII 1040 WEST NORTHI HIGHWAY MOUNT PROSPECT.Il ~ MOUNT PROSPE' DEVELOPMENT GROt lYPE 'C TYPICAL PL ELEVATIONS ~:7~HIJ SCALE: 1116"= ".0" :.ri ,I to; . ""I Cl .1 -II ..0: ~i lfll .0 N, 445'-,2-.1Lb' 151'-S 1//2" setbacK N "''J! "",~ ,'" ""rr New wrought iron fence landscape buffer- see landscape plan ~ East Property Line 443,18' _ ' 30'-11b' ~r ~ -t TYPE A TYPE B TYPE B TYPE A Gueeot "./"klnG; -- Dedicated 24' Fire lane - TYPE B TYFE A TYPE B ~ f'1.' ~ ~~ w ! & ~ ~. ZONING DISTRICT: LOT SIZE: LOT AREA PER UNIT: UNITS PER ACRE: PROPOSED NUMBER OF UNITS: LOT COVERAGE: PROPOSED GREENSPACE: PROPOSED FLR AREA RATIO: PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: NUMBER OF PROPOSED PARKING: R-2 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 90,671,04 SF/2,08 ACRES 6,476.5 SF 6.7 14 UNITS 43,863.14 SF; 48.4% 46,807.90 SF; 51.6% 0,41 28'-0" 28 PRIVATE GARAGE 28 PRIV ATE SPACES 16 GUEST PARKING TYpE A ~ b .'1 10' 'l'i 3'1'-10 Sib' 0" 'I \) I"'" I ~ .'" 'l' . ~I . ,"' "~ , -. 1\ ~_ot.[o_d :_09Q_OQQQQ-IR90_0~' _ S.9?O_?-Q_OQ~O 1: I West Property Line 319, 97' ~ --- Existing neighbor's Iron fence to remain , II landscape buffer- see landscape plan 50'-5 ~/b" "-6' 'b' 114'-0' 1'-6 'Ib' "6'-'05/b' "-6 'Ib" 11'<'-0" 7(--- '-'-'-''''---T/,-~ '-'-'- '-ll. -//,--"'-'-'-'-' - --4-'-"-''-'-'-' =- ~ setbaCK _~~~_____~__ _._ 51.'1'-, 1. Sib" e. . . , , " . ~. : . : :~. . PROPOSED SET BACKS: EAST 33'-0" WEST 29'-9 3/4" NORTH 30-5 7/8" SOUTH 30'-0" Site Plan Scale: 1" = 40' - 0" Mount Prospect Homes The Office of John Conrad Schiess Arc hit e c t 1040 W, Northwest Highway · Mount Prospect. Illinois 15 May 2007 Revised for Village Board Approval JCSA () 2007 SKI Sheet No. TYPE 'B' REAR ELEVATION TYPE 'A' REAR ELEVATION LJDD GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY & IN-PROGRESS WINDOWS & DOORS LOCA TION SUBJECT TO B MODIFIED ONCE ELEVATIONS ARE FINALIZED I ~ I NO. 19 ,-AV 1007 SSl.;SO ~ \IIL.:.A55 'G\I!~ DATE RMSION 1,011 , ~ .....!V' ~ ~ Il'PE'A'SIDE ELEVATION TYPE 'A' FRONT ELEVATION TYPE 'B' FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" TYPE'A'&'B' TOWNHOME ELEVATIONS TYPE 'B' 2ND FLR - 1 .025SoFt ~=~QM =*2 'I4.....c-.~-9" '1 e;::~:"'1::~ 0"-6'.'5'.3' , TYPE 'A' 2ND FLR - ,. I4aSaFt I,r TYPE 'B' 1ST FLR - I. I 65SoFt TYPE 'B' - I .B20 wIthout Garaoe 2.220 with Garaqe 2.lMlLwlth Gro & Bsmt TYPE 'B' BASEMENT - 655SaFt " i: ~A"'~ '~.'r ~:~r b',..,.,.. '6~IC'.5'~' .. ..~ ~ 71-0"" :2~.g' tjN~~..AVAj';::'O a;,-O\.\I~e DESIGNBRIDGE ~ ::10-0-,,20-0 DESlGNBRociE.lTD. 14ISweSTGRAND^VEMJE CHlo.GO. rlbOb22 TEL: 312.421.5885 FfoX: 312.421.5889 E-M4Jl: otflCe@desigrbrict}eltd.com II . ~ o '* ~- I 0' I"~. I~~I: Ur\;EXCAVA"T"'Cr::l '-'NCER G~e J 040 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS ~ '20-0'. %)'-0' ~ 71.rF.:;lS..eo ~ '.'~'T ~ MOUNT PROSPECT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC TYPE 'A' BASEMENT - 770SoFt I I i TYPE 'A' & 'B' TYPICAL PlANS & ELEVATIONS TYPE'A'&'B' TOWNHOME FLOOR PLANS SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" a~'----~DD: i5J007-Ali-o Inl A-I.' UJtj ~=D;<.""""'" =~ tA.'_3". :20-3. ~ :2O-o-.X)"Q I JNc::xr AVATFn eE:..OWG~e: - GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY & IN-PROGRESS WINDOWS & DOORS LOCA TION SUBJECT TO ] MODIFIED ONCE ELEV A TIONS ARE FINALIZED 19 MAY 2OC17 6SL.:EO FOR Vll.!-AG2: QEv1 NO. DATE REVISION I DESIGNBRIOGE DeSICiNBRDGE. LTD. 14' 5 WEST GRANO ^VfMJE CHICItGO. 1160622 TeL: 312.421.5885 FAx: 312.421..5889 E-MM.: oII'<e@desjg<'bndgelld.com mJ . MOUNT PROSPECT I DEVELOPMENT GROUP, W I I TYPE 'C' TYPICAL PLANS ~ i ELEVATIONS ~~.. DOl JSI 007-A i-D Inl A-l .. 'Jf ,;: # 'i' :,ji, ~: iJ IYPE 'C' REAR ELEVATION TYPE 'C' SIDE ELEVATION TYPE 'C' FRONT ELEVATION TYPE1C1 TOWNHOME ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" '~ / ' , ' , , , " , , , , , '0/ """ /' "'" ae.:oa '0..0.\2..0 ~ 1&~'. 32-a' BEC~ #"; :2f-3".'3"'V TYPE 'C' 2ND FLR - 1.0 I 5SoFt TYPE 'C' 1ST FLR _ I, 705SqFt TYPE 'C' - 2,350 without Garage 2,750 with Garage 3,415 with Grg & Ssmt TYPE 'C' BASEMENT - 695SaFt T Y PEl C I TOW N H 0 M.E F L 0 0 R P LAN S SCALE: 1/16"= 1'.0" ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1040 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY WHEREAS, John Conrad Schiess, Mount Prospect Development Group ("Petitioner'), has filed an application to rezone certain property generally located at 1040 West Northwest Highway ("Subject Property''), and legally described as follows: Lot 1 in State Farm Subdivision, being a subdivision of part of the East % of the southeast % of Sec. 33, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois, as shown on the plat thereof recorded September 28, 1988 as document number 88447034 Property Index Number: 03-33-407-025-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned from B-1 (Business Office) to R-2 (Attached Single Family Residence) District; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for rezoning being the subject of PZ-14-06, before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 14th day of December 2006, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the th day of June, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and a negative recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of PZ-14-06 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Official Zoning Map of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance from B-1 (Business Office) to R-2 (Attached Single Family Residence) District. A,B PZ-14-06 Page 2/2 SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2007. Richard M. Lohrstorfer Mayor Pro Tern ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:ICLKOIfileslWINIORDINANClmapamendment1 040WNWHWYjan2007 .doc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1040 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY WHEREAS, John Conrad Scheiss, Mount Prospect Development Group ("Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit in the nature of a Planned Unit Development and Variations with respect to property located at 1040 West Northwest Highway ("Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 1 in State Farm Subdivision, being a subdivision of part of the East % of the southeast X of Sec. 33, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois, as shown on the plat thereof recorded September 28, 1988 as document number 88447034 Property Index Number: 03-33-407-025-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks to create a Planned Unit Development providing for the construction of a seventeen (17) unit townhome development; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use permit and Variations being the subject of Case No. PZ-14-06 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 14th day of December, 2006, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the ih day of June, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and a negative recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the requests meet the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit for a Planned Unit Development and a Variation to allow lot coverage in excess of 50% to accommodate the modified footprint of building two (2) and five (5) additional guest parking spaces would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the Conditional Use Permit in the nature of a Planned Unit Development being the subject of this Ordinance is subject to the following conditions: A. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by The Office of John Conrad Schiess, revision dated November 28, 2006, and further revised to include: 1) modify building two (2) so its footprint is similar to building five (5) and has a three foot (3') off-set and balconies on the second floor; 2) the east setback is no less than seventeen foot (17') and 3) add five (5) additional Guest parking spaces. B. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plans prepared by The Office of John Conrad Schiess, revision dated November 27,2006, but revised to include a wrought-iron style fence along the east and north lot lines; C. Development of the units in general conformance with the floor plans prepared by The Office of John Conrad Schiess, dated November 8, 2006; Page 2/3 PZ-14-06 D. Development of the elevations in general conformance with the site plan prepared by The Office of John Conrad Schiess, dated November 8, 2006; but Building two (2) is modified so it is similar to Building five (5) and has a three foot (3') off-set and balconies on the second floor and the east setback is not less than seventeen foot (17') and five (5) additional Guest parking spaces are added; and E. Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the Petitioner shall submit a lighting plan that complies with the Village's lighting regulations for the lighting within the development; F. Prior to obtaining the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Petitioner must submit homeowner's association documents for Staff review and approval; and G. The Petitioner shall construct all units according to all Village Codes and regulations, including, but not limited to: the installation of automatic fire sprinklers, fire hydrants and roads must be located and constructed according to Development and Fire Code standards. SECTION THREE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant approval of a Conditional Use permit and Variation as provided in Sections 14.203.F.7 & Sec. 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, for a Planned Unit Development for a 17 unit townhome development, all as shown on the Site Plan revision dated November 28, 2006 a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of June 2007. Richard M. Lohrstorfer Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files\WIN\ORDINANC\C USE,V AR-1 040nwhighwayjune2007 .doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 1, 2007 SUBJECT: PZ-09-07 - CONDITIONAL USE (COMMUNITY CENTER WITH A SCHOO 501 MIDWAY DRIVE NIAGARA EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INe. - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-09-07, a request to operate a Community Center and school in the B3 District, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their April 26, 2007 meeting. The Petitioner obtained a Conditional Use permit in 2004 to operate a Community Center. However, the improvements were not completed and the Conditional Use permit expired. The Petitioner has expanded the scope of the project to include a school in the northern portion of the building, but the Community Center would generally be the same as the proposal approved in 2004, by Ord. 5414. The Community Center contains a hybrid of uses, most of which are typically found in a commercial district. However, the school is a college prep school, offering classes for students in grades Pre-K through 8th grade, and would be located in a commercial zoning district. The Village's Comprehensive Plan classifies the Subject Property as commercial, so the request fails to meet the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance because the use does not comply with the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, Staff recommended the request be denied. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the request and noted that this type of school fits well at this location because the building is set far back from the main street, which is conducive for a designation-type use. There was discussion regarding the parking lot and water detention, and the Petitioner confirmed site and landscaping improvements required per Ord. 5414 would be completed. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve the Conditional Use permit to operate a Community Center with a school at 501 Midway Drive, Case No. PZ-09-07, subject to the following conditions: . The project shall be completed in general 'compliance with plans prepared by DLK Civic Design date stamped April 3, 2007; . All work shall be completed within 18 months, including site work and landscaping noted in Ord. 5414; . Fire and Building comments regarding the fire lane and egress noted in the Staff Report shall be met; . Enrollment numbers shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development each school year; and PZ-09-07 June 1, 2007 Page 2 · The facilities shall be developed in compliance with all Village and State regulations. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their June 5,2007 meeting. Staffwill be present to answer any questions related to this matter. H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2007\MEJ Mem05\PZ-09-07 MEJ MEMO (501 Midway Dr- CU . Niagara).doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-09-07 Hearing Date: April 26, 2007 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 501 Midway Drive PETITIONER: Niagara Foundation PUBLICATION DATE: April 11, 2007 PIN NUMBERS: 08-23-402-010 REQUEST: Conditional Use - Community Center with a school MEMBERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Marlys Haaland Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers ST AFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judith Connolly, Senior Planner Ellen Divita, Deputy Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Serkan Aikan, Stephen Miller Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Richard Rogers moved to approve the minutes of the March 22, 2007 and April 12, 2007 meetings and Joseph Donnelly seconded the motion. The minutes were approved 6-0 with Mary McCabe abstaining. After hearing two previous cases, Chairperson Juracek introduced Case PZ-09-07, a request for a Conditional Use at 501 Midway Drive, at 9:23 p.m. She stated this case was heard approximately four years ago, however the project was not completed and the Conditional Use permit expired. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, stated that the Subject Property is located on Midway Drive, a cul-de-sac street on the west side of Elmhurst Road, between Algonquin Road and Oakton Street. The Subject Property contains an existing one-story office/warehouse building with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B3 Community Shopping and is bordered to the north and east by the B3 District, and to the south and west by the R4 Multi-Family Residential District. Ms. Connolly said the Petitioner obtained a Conditional Use permit in 2004 to operate a Community Center. However, the improvements were not completed and the Conditional Use permit expired. Since obtaining the Conditional Use permit, the Petitioner has expanded the scope of the project to include a school in the northern portion of the building formerly occupied by db Sound. The Petitioner is required to obtain approval from the Village Board for a new Conditional Use permit for a Community Center and school. Ms. Connolly stated that the Petitioner proposes the Community Center offer the same services and events in the originally approved Conditional Use permit for a Community Center including guest rooms, conference rooms, a gymnasium, a stage, assembly areas, and 3 classrooms. The proposed Community Center would occupy 70% of the building while the proposed school would occupy 30% of the building and include 12 classrooms, 4 labs, and a gym. Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting April 26, 2007 PZ-09-07 Page 2 Ms. Connolly said the existing structure does not meet current setback requirements and the site exceeds 75% lot coverage, which is the maximum amount permitted. The Petitioner does not propose to modify the building footprint and the site will retain its legal non-conforming classification. Ms. Connolly stated that the Petitioner agrees to completing landscaping improvements to the site as previously required by Ordinance 5414. Ms. Connolly said the Petitioner's plan indicates the site will provide a total of 217 parking spaces. She said Section 14.2224 of the Zoning Ordinance lists the minimum number of parking spaces required based on how the space will be used. In this case, calculating each use separately, the Petitioner is required to provide 164 parking spaces for the Community Center and 46 spaces for the school. Staff has concerns that a parking deficiency may occur if the scope of services and school enrollment exceed the levels noted in the Petitioner's application. Therefore, the Petitioner offered to submit enrollment lists to the Director of Community Development to document compliance with the Village's parking regulations. Ms. Connolly stated that the Petitioner proposes to make minor modifications to the exterior of the building. Improvements include adding additional exits as required by Village Codes, installing a new canopy over the front entrance, and installing new windows. The Petitioner is required to improve the interior of the building as required by Building and Fire Codes. A complete egress, building, and fire code review would be required at time of permit. Ms. Connolly said the Fire Department reviewed the project and requires one side of Midway Drive as well as the bulb of the cul-de-sac be designated as 'No Parking Fire Lane' and striped per Village Code regulations. In addition, the northern drive will also be a Fire Lane as shown on the attached exhibit. She said Public Works reviewed the project and noted that the previously required site improvements (sanitary service, paving, etc.) were still required. Ms. Connolly stated that the Building and Fire Codes specifically state that in determining design occupant load and means of egress requirements, the number of occupants for whom the means of egress in the facilities must be established is by the largest number computed in accordance with maximum floor area allowance per occupant as outlined by building code. This evaluation of the petition is not a complete building and fire plan compliance review as it relates to egress, occupant load, travel distance, fire-rating, separation or non-separation of mixed uses, common path of travel, accessibility, type of construction required, and allowed areas of construction. She said according to the Building Code, where a building contains two or more occupancies and where they share portions of the same means of egress system, those egress components shall meet the more stringent requirements of all occupancies that are shared. This petition review of use does not release the applicant, petitioner, design professionals, or contractors from specifying, designing, and constructing the project to adhere to all applicable building and fire codes that applicable at the local, state, and federal level. These comments and minor review do not constitute a complete review of the drawings and they are not approved at this time. A complete egress, Building, and Fire code review will be required for compliance with the Village's adopted Codes. Ms. Connolly said the standards for Conditional Uses are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. She summarized these findings as: · The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; · The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; · Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and · Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions ofthe Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting April 26, 2007 PZ-09-07 Page 3 Ms. Connolly stated that the Subject Property is zoned for commercial use; however, the Zoning Ordinance lists Community Centers as a Conditional Use in the B3 District. The Petitioner is not changing the footprint of the building and proposes minor exterior improvements. Ms. Connolly said the proposed Community Center contains a hybrid of uses, most of which are typically found in a commercial district: performance area, offices, guest rooms/hotel, and exercise facilities. However, the proposed school is a college prep school, offering classes for students in grades Pre-K through 8th grade. The school would operate from 7:30am to 6:30pm, which includes after/before school care. Ms. Connolly stated that the Petitioner submitted information that reflects a quality school, however it would be located in a commercial zoning district. The Village Code permits schools in limited circumstances in almost all residential zoning districts. In addition, the Village's Comprehensive Plan classifies the Subject Property as commercial. Ms. Connolly said the proposed Community Center with a school fails to meet the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance because the use does not comply with the Village's Comprehensive Plan. She said based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the following recommendation: "To approve a Conditional Use permit that would allow a 42,614 square foot Community Center and a 18,454 square foot school to operate as noted in the Petitioner's application for the property at 501 Midway Drive, Case Number PZ-09-07." Ms. Connolly stated that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Chairperson Juracek asked if the Petitioner acquired the additional 18,000 square feet SInce the original Community Center request was heard; Ms. Connolly confirmed that is correct. Richard Rogers stated that the Staff report indicates the improvements were not completed and the permit expired for the Community Center. He asked for clarification on that issue. Ms. Connolly stated that the Village Code requires work for the Conditional Use Permit to be completed within 18 months and the scope of those improvements was not completed. Mr. Rogers asked if the landscaping was completed. Ms. Connolly stated that the landscaping was not completed, and it was required as part of the Conditional Use. Leo Floros asked if the space was being used for offices. Ms. Connolly stated that she believes there is currently limited office use at the location. Chairperson Juracek swore in Serkan Aikan, Vice-President of the Niagara Foundation, and Stephen Miller of DLK Civic Design. Mr. Aikan stated that the project was approved 4 years ago, but funds were not available to complete the project. He stated that the Foundation now has the funding to complete the project and that is why they have brought the Case back to the Commission. He also said the Foundation has a school in Chicago and many of the students reside in the Northwest Suburbs, so there is a demand for them to construct the school in the suburban area. He stated that the Foundation owns the building and is asking the Village for the opportunity to open their school in Mount Prospect. He said they would meet whatever requirements are necessary to open the school as an accessory use. Chairperson Juracek asked if the Foundation is now applying for the entire project including the office space, the Community Center, and the school. Mr. Aikan stated that is correct. Chairperson Juracek asked if absent this Conditional Use, the Foundation would not be able to move forward with the project. Ms. Connolly stated that the office space would be a permitted use, but the Community Center and the school would not be allowed. Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting April 26, 2007 PZ-09-07 Page 4 Chairperson Juracek pointed out that the school is the new addition to the request, which Mr. Aikan confirmed. There was general discussion regarding the original request including the office space and Community Center and that the new request now includes the school as an accessory use. Chairperson Juracek stated that this application is for approval of the entire project. Ronald Roberts stated that the packets did not contain any information regarding allowing the Community Center, not the school as an accessory use. Ms. Connolly stated that the Petitioner may not have realized the Conditional Use for the Community Center expired and only included information for the school as an Accessory Use. Mr. Rogers asked why the Petitioner never completed the landscaping. Mr. Aikan stated that there was no specific reason the landscaping was not completed, just that entire project was not completed and they want to finish the project all together. Mr. Rogers asked what the time frame is for completing the entire project. Mr. Aikan said 1 Y2 to 2 years. Chairperson Juracek asked if they have the funding to complete the project. Mr. Aikan confirmed the Foundation has the funds to complete the project. Mr. Rogers stated that the Conditional Use would expire in 18 months and the Petitioner would need to have the work completed. Chairperson Juracek pointed out that the school does not have to be open and in session in 18 months, but that the work on the project would need to be completed. The Petitioner stated that it should not be a problem to complete the work in that time frame. Ronald Roberts asked if they are essentially moving the existing school operations from the city of Chicago to the Mount Prospect location. Mr. Aikan confirmed that is true. Mr. Roberts asked how many students they anticipate at the Mount Prospect location. Mr. Aikan said there are approximately 75 students in Chicago and they would like to have 120-130 students. Mr. Roberts asked if the not-for-profit Foundation raises their money from tuition and how much that tuition is. Mr. Aikan stated that the tuition is currently $5500 per year and if they had 120 students enrolled, the school would fund itself. He stated that the Community Center is funded by their members. Mr. Roberts asked if the school runs year-round; Mr. Aikan confirmed the school does run all year. Mr. Miller stated that there were Staff concerns with the available parking. He said the parking will be sufficient because the school use and the Community Center would not be holding events concurrently. Mr. Rogers asked what the ages of the students are. Mr. Aikan said the school is for Kindergarten through 8th grade. Mr. Rogers pointed out that not many cars would be left at the site during the day. Mr. Miller said the parking requirements are to meet the code. There was general discussion regarding transporting the students. Chairperson Juracek stated that this type of school fits well at this location because the building is set far back from the main street, which is conducive for a designation-type use. Mr. Floros asked if there is a playground for the students. Mr. Aikan stated there is not a playground, but there are several areas inside the school for recreation. There was general discussion regarding the offerings of the school. Mr. Aikan highlighted some of the awards the school has earned. Chairperson Juracek said this would be an asset to the Village and Mr. Roberts concurred. Marlys Haaland stated she was concerned with the traffic counts on Route 83. She asked if there was going to be any lights added to the intersection. Mr. Miller said there is a dedicated turn lane off of Route 83 onto Midway Drive. Mr. Miller pointed out that the building is set back in the cul-de-sac and the students would not be near the traffic, even while waiting for their rides. Mr. Roberts stated he supports this type of project in the commercial area. He asked if they have planned for traffic flows for student drop-off and pick-up. Mr. Miller said this is a very safe area and the required fire lane Arlene J uracek, Chairperson Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting April 26, 2007 PZ-09-07 Page 5 provides easy access to both sides of the parking lots. There was general discussion regarding parking. Mr. Roberts asked ifthere had been any consideration to adding a playground. Mr. Miller said they may not be able to give up the parking spaces, but as much green-space as possible has been maintained in the project. There was additional discussion regarding the parking lots and water detention. Mr. Rogers stated that his only concern is the Petitioner getting the project completed within 18 months. Mr. Miller stated that the construction itself would not take longer than 18 months, but he said at this point the design is not complete and that requires additional time. Chairperson Juracek asked if the project needs to be complete, or substantially underway in 18 months. Ms. Connolly stated that the project has to be substantially underway within 12 months and completed within 18 months. Mr. Miller asked if there is a way to have a Conditional Use that goes beyond the 18 months. Ms. Connolly stated that a previous case was extended with a Variation, asking for relief from that Code requirement. Mr. Miller said they can work within the 18 month requirement. Mr. Aikan said the project is currently ready to move forward, unlike the last time, and he will work with the 18 month time range. Mr. Rogers pointed out that the time constraint begins at the time of Village Board approval. Mr. Roberts stated that in the past, the Commission has given the OK for a project to move forward and then come back to present the final plans. Ms. Connolly stated that the Petitioner is seeking final approval and the Commission needs to make a recommendation to the Village Board. Mr. Roberts said there are items missing from the packet that would need to be reviewed for the project. Chairperson Juracek stated that many of these items are not for Planning and Zoning consideration and would be reviewed at the time of permit. Mr. Rogers stated that the site is running out of room and may be over-parked. He said if the Petitioner decides to add a playground, they would lose additional parking spaces. Ms. Connolly said the proposed use includes two significant gymnasiums, an auditorium, and over-night guest rooms. All of these uses have specific parking requirements and the code needs to account for maximum usage. Chairperson Juracek stated that the Commission should leave it up to the Petitioner whether or not to provide an outdoor play area. There was general discussion regarding playground and parking usage. Mr. Roberts stated that the site is over 75% lot coverage and that adding a playground or green-space would get them closer to that 75% lot coverage. Chairperson Juracek pointed out that the lot coverage is an existing condition and the Petitioner is not obligated to reduce the lot coverage. There were no additional questions and Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing at 9:58 p.m. Leo Floros made a motion to approve Case Number PZ-09-07; a Conditional Use request to operate a Community Center including a school at 501 Midway Drive. Ms. Connolly stated that if the Commission moves forward with this recommendation, Staff suggests adding the following conditions for approval: . The project be completed in general compliance with all submitted plans; . All work be completed within 18 months, including sitework and landscaping; . Fire and Building comments regarding the fire lane and egress shall be met; . Enrollment numbers are submitted to the Director of Community Development each school year; and . Developed in compliance with all Village and State regulations. Chairperson Juracek stated that these conditions are fairly standard. Ms. Connolly said one primary concern is the egress. Leo Floros asked if they can approve a time line greater than 18 months. Chairperson Juracek stated it may be redundant to include the 18 month time limit, since it appears in the Village Code. Ms. Connolly said at a minimum the site work and landscaping would be required to be completed with the rest of the project. Mr. Rogers said the landscape and site work requirement should be a condition of approval. Mr. Floros amended his motion for approval to include the conditions of approval. Marlys Haaland seconded the amended motion. Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting April 26, 2007 PZ-09-07 Page 6 UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Donnelly, Floros, Haaland, Roberts, Rogers, McCabe, Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. After hearing two additional cases and discussing the Zoning Ordinance update, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn at 10:48 p.m., seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. ~ Community Development ve Assistant H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2007\Minutes\PZ-09-07 SOl Midway,doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 09-07 LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUESTS: 501 Midway Drive Niagara Educational Services, Inc. Niagara Educational Services, Inc. 08-23-402-010 3.67 acres B3 Community Shopping Office/W arehouse Conditional Use (Community Center and school) LOCATION MAP MIDWAY_DR (I) - ... COLQN! .oR f", Ie ~. tI: C ----- -~ '\ ,'" ~ MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: APRIL 19, 2007 HEARING DATE: APRIL 26, 2007 SUBJECT: PZ-09-07 - CONDITIONAL USE (COMMUNITY CENTER AND SCHOOL) 501 MIDWAY DRIVE - NIAGARA EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the April 26, 2007 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Niagara Educational Services, Inc. (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 501 Midway Drive (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking Conditional Use approval for a Community Center and school. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the April 11, 2007 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on Midway Drive, a cul-de-sac street on the west side of Elmhurst Road, between Algonquin Road and Oakton Street. The Subject Property contains an existing one-story office/warehouse building with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned B3 Community Shopping and is bordered to the north and east by the B3 District, and to the south and west by the R4 Multi-Family Residential District. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner obtained a Conditional Use permit in 2004 to operate a Community Center. However, the improvements were not completed and the Conditional Use permit expired. Since obtaining the Conditional Use permit, the Petitioner has expanded the scope of the project to include a school in the northern portion of the building formerly occupied by db Sound. The Petitioner is required to obtain approval from the Village Board for a new Conditional Use permit for a Community Center and school. The Petitioner proposes the Community Center offer the same services and events in the originally approved Conditional Use permit for a Community Center: guest rooms, conference rooms, a gymnasium, a stage, assembly areas, and 3 classrooms. The proposed Community Center would occupy 70% of the building while the proposed school would occupy 30% ofthe building and include 12 classrooms, 4 labs, and a gym. PZ-09-07 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 26, 2007 Page 3 GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The existing structure does not meet current setback requirements and the site exceeds 75% lot coverage, which is the maximum amount permitted. The Petitioner does not propose to modify the building footprint and the site will retain its legal non-conforming classification. Landscaping - The Petitioner continues to agree to improve the site as previously required by Ord. 5414. Parking - The Petitioner's plan indicates the site will provide a total of 217 parking spaces. Sec. 14.2224 of the Zoning Ordinance lists the minimum number of parking spaces required based on how the space will be used. In this case, calculating each use separately, the Petitioner is required to provide 164 parking spaces for the Community Center and 46 spaces for the school (see attached chart). Staff has concerns that a parking deficiency may occur if the scope of services and school enrollment exceed the levels noted in the Petitioner's application. Therefore, the Petitioner offered to submit enrollment lists to the Director of Community Development to document compliance with the Village's parking regulations. Existing Building - The Petitioner proposes to make minor modifications to the exterior of the building. Improvements include adding additional exits as required by Village Codes, installing a new canopy over the front entrance, and installing new windows. The Petitioner is required to improve the interior of the building as required by Building and Fire Codes. A complete egress, building, and fire code review would be required at time of permit. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS · The Fire Department reviewed the project and requires one side of Midway Drive as well as the bulb of the cul-de-sac be designated as 'No Parking Fire Lane' and striped per Village Code regulations. In addition, the northern drive will also be a Fire Lane as shown on the attached exhibit. · Public Works reviewed the project and noted that the previously required site improvements (sanitary service, paving, etc.) were still required. · Building and Fire Codes specifically state that in determining design occupant load and means of egress requirements, the number of occupants for whom the means of egress in the facilities must be established is by the largest number computed in accordance with maximum floor area allowance per occupant as outlined by building code. This evaluation of the petition is not a complete building and fire plan compliance review as it relates to egress, occupant load, travel distance, fire-rating, separation or non-separation of mixed uses, common path of travel, accessibility, type of construction required, and allowed areas of construction. According to the Building Code, where a building contains two or more occupancies and where they share portions of the same means of egress system, those egress components shall meet the more stringent requirements of all occupancies that are shared. This petition review of use does not release the applicant, petitioner, design professionals, or contractors from specifying, designing, and constructing the project to adhere to all applicable building and fire codes that applicable at the local, state, and federal level. These comments and minor review do not constitute a complete review of the drawings and they are not approved at this time. A complete egress, Building, and Fire code review will be required for compliance with the Village's adopted Codes. CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: PZ-09-07 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 26, 2007 Page 4 . The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; . The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development ofthose properties; . Adequate provision of utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and . Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The Subject Property is zoned for commercial use; however, the Zoning Ordinance lists Community Centers as a Conditional Use in the B3 District. The Petitioner is not changing the footprint of the building and proposes minor exterior improvements. The proposed Community Center contains a hybrid of uses, most of which are typically found in a commercial district: performance area, offices, guest rooms/hotel, and exercise facilities. However, the proposed school is a college prep school, offering classes for students in grades Pre-K through 8th grade. The school would operate from 7:30am to 6:30pm, which includes after/before school care. The Petitioner submitted information that reflects a quality school, however it would be located in a commercial zoning district. The Village Code permits schools in limited circumstances in almost all residential zoning districts. In addition, the Village's Comprehensive Plan classifies the Subject Property as commercial. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Community Center with a school fails to meet the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance because the use does not comply with the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the following recommendation: "To approve a Conditional Use permit that would allow a 42,614 sq. ft. Community Center and a 18,454 sq. ft. school to operate as noted in the Petitioner's application for the property at 501 Midway Drive, PZ-09-07." The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William 1. Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development Ijme PZ-09-07 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 26, 2007 Page 5 Parkina Calculation Information # Spaces Use SQ. Ft. Villal!e Code Parking Requirement Required Gym 5580 5 per 1,000 SQ. ft. 28 Library 797 2 per 1,000 SQ. ft. 2 38 students / 4 3 Classrooms teachers 1 per teacher and 1 per 8 students 9 Office Space (total SQ. f.t) 2015 4 per 1,000 sq. ft. 8 Lobby 1995 3.5 per 1,000 SQ. ft. 7 Assembly Areas 4786 3.5 per 1,000 sq. ft. 17 Stage 671 used in coniunction with fixed seats Fixed Seats 201 1 per 4 seats plus 1 per 2 employees 50 Fixed Seats 97 1 per 4 seats plus 1 per 2 employees 24 Guest Rooms 15 1 per room plus 1 per employee 15 4 emoloyees 4 TOTAL # SPACES REQUIRED for the Communitv Center 164 Number of People School Administration 5 1 per teacher and 1 per 8 students 5 School Teachers 20 1 per teacher and 1 per 8 students 20 Students 168 1 per teacher and 1 per 8 students 21 TOTAL # SPACES REQUIRED for the school 46 TOTAL # SPACES REQUIRED OVERALL: 210 PZ-09-07 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 26, 2007 Page 6 Fire Lane Reauirement , I I ~~. i I I ! rr. d: If f'- I. 1'. II I ~ e..CQt," l ""..,~ .. _.,."JJ l . i ~.. J. ...... f- ~.. -- I. .-- ! I i.COkb.'~ . \~.F"'" ~.- I -....,_... \V~ <(" ~ _.-:-~ n..... _._'.U-=!=_~~~~-"? Ji:'- _____.j...____ r 71 I '1" :"~ · ~e" RQSIU .:;~:..- .- .-:"q.l~i'l " '/ . !? ;;. ;~'ij-T-' ,.. tJ1'- .~ +..... ~~?~OJ;- 4;- '~-~j: j r.'.'-.....~....'> ;'.r.iW!l .f/" l~j '~eO',. ~ if f ~! Ii - 'l Jr '-"t I!.,~ . : l_i ts..n ~ j I , /..Ight POltt'ft. High I Story Concrete Ponel Building 150 I BlJ,J<jing Footprint Area = 44.670 5q. Fl / / / ~.' ~~. -...::~~ \ t 9 -' (' ~ ~~-'-""~"","",,,~ , ..- ~QI 9.60' 4 H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning CQMM\P&Z 2007\SlaffMemo\PZ..o9..o7 MEMO (501 MidwayOrive . eu . commw1ity cultural ctr with school).doc EXISTING lANDSCm EXISTING APARTMENT BUIlWNCS (R-4) S' - 6' TAll SHRUBS EXISTING PARKING fOR OfftCE BlOC. (1-1) - - -"'~O'L - - - - - l I-~IIIIIIIIIIIIIII '3: :1 lOT 1 : I I ,8 IE EXISTING PARKING fOR OmCE BlDG. (B-3) I I I I I _-.L___ ~ UIOWA Y DRIVE EXISTING PARKING FOR APARTMENT COMPLEX (B-3) EXISTING LANDSCAPE FUlUR[ LANDSCAPING ENTERPRISE DRtVE EXISTING ......MNT C<lUP\.[' (R-4) @ SITE PLAN lII:Mf: ,...., I PRO.ECT AN) SITE DATA I 8ITE NIEA TOTAL SCHOOl BUIl.l)lN(; ARU: "454 SF TOTAL NeC BUII.DlNC ARlA: 42,.'4 Sf X (F SOfOOL IIUIUllNG CO\IERAGE: 30.22 X X Of CULllJRAL a:NlER 8UILOlNC COVERAGE: 6B.1as PARKIG ACnJAt.-PROWl[D: REQUIRED: PARKINC SPACES 217 TOTAL PER w.tAGE Of M.P. CODE; H.C. SPACES 1 TOTAL I SPACE PER EIIIPlOYU , SPACE PER Ii STUDENTS (OfF S1R([T PNllUNG REQ. PER IoU.lAGE Of IIlPROSPECT) SCHOOl PAllICING SPACES: 48 ~ ~AcitE~LO'l'EES J25 EIIIPlOYEES H.C. PAIlIOMG SPACES: , 188 S1\JOE:NTS/8 .. 21 SPACES H.C. SPACES 2 TOTAL fIO TOT At PROWl[D 46 TOTAL REQUIR(D :5.5 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF GROSS R.00fI AREA CULTURAL CENTER P. SPActS: 161 '.7/3.~47.71 H.C. PAllICING SPACES, . 47.71 X 1000_47,714 SF < 42Jn4 Sf 167 TOTAL 167 TOTAL PfR I8C 2DOJ ; SCHOCl SNll.E LE\lEL "'" AREA (Sf) Sf /PER OCC. oct. PER FLOOR ........., .., " 61-1 CLASSROOM ,- 20 "'.1 ~....... ,'" 200 ,., STORACE J60 ... 0.72 "'" ,In '" ... OFFlC( 1.... '00 11.4 llEC..-.... SOl JOO ,... GENERAL NOTE: SlUOENTS (PER CLASSROOM) .. J84.1 STUll(NT PARKING l84.1/8 .. 48 . ALL ACCESSIa.E PAllICING SPACES TO AOtIIN. EMPlO'l[[ PARKING ~25 HAW: INJEJlNAnONAL SYIlIBOL PER TEAatEft PAIlklNG AOMG SECTION SCHOOl PNllllNC SPACES: 13 fOTM (REOUIREO BY CODE) 6. ~ 'p 4'~'Ul DL~ Civic Desigl TMf_......EIuiIllq .'DSClAhUittllpnAwnl. ""'- -..... '''.312,322.09'' F-.312.322.5324 _.~com """'" NIAGARA DUCATION SERVICES SCIENCE ACADEI OF CHICAGO 501 MIDWAY DR MT.PROSPECT.I SITE PLA' NO PARKlI EQUIREME .... - ""- -by """by -by "'-by ~ C DlKCMc:Deslgn2OOl Applicable Bu1dln9 Coa: l8C 2000 (seellon. shown On porentlle...). with VIIoge 01 Mounl Pra~ct amendment. 1. Tweolproject a R..OYOtIon of ...~ting building. 18,45-4 SF" an firsl level 2. O<<uponc, closslfocallorl (305) o. Oo:cupone,Group E. Eduutionol J. Construction t)P' (Tobie 601) a.TlP'18 Jo.~:1~d ne.. .leel lnImin9-2IlR Ip,o,-on fnpraof,"'il per rlarmng MrpPOl"t1n9 rool onty-l HR G)p.bd. p", UL-P:)16 (e.eepl in ,..... -lhe rool i. _ 20" obow lOOt) Root slructure-l HR OJ)!). bd. protection..... Ul..P:)16 Edlfl"ior woII -...1. 1fT t~l-up cone. 10 lem4in All e.t. portltlon. IholI be 1 Hff roled Unleh noted otherwise 4. Sp<inkl....)'SI..". a. Automollc sprinkler srstem rfllUired for Group E for orea. "ealer thOI'I 20.000 Sf (903.2.2); Ol.Itomotlc: sprlnldlfl" sptem provided 5. AIIowCIblcl heitht ond building c...o (Tobie 5OJ) o. AIIoorobIe: 3.lorIe.. a,5OO Sf p", slor)' b. Actual; 1 .tor,. 18,454 Sf 6. fIre seporoUon. r..,1red OIId prOYidecl o.BeI_p........,ondbuHdin'il b. eet_ oo:~)' groups wlthln lNIIdin, (302.3.2): 2 hour. c. Non~1l interior porlilions (T~ 601)' 0 hour d. Rool (Tobie 601): 1 hour 1. Interior wall ond e....... Iinlah reqvlrelnenla (Tobie 8OJ.5) a. Verllcal elllts ond pnsogewo,.: Closs 8 (HA) b. E.il acc_ cOCTidor. ond ..ilwo)." Ooes C c. Roome ond eftdoeed epocu, Clos. C 8 CGfrldor ("..-re.I$IOI"ICe rolint (Table 101l1.l): o. Group E with OIItomotlc ."lnkIer sptem: 0 hours @ SECTION-SCHOOL SCU: 1/"01'-4/ 9.Eor-ss a. ElIIt OC".. tro.... di.tonc:e allowed (Tobie 1015.1)' 200' b. Mftlmum corridor width (1016.2): 72" c. Dead end corrldcw tlmit (1016.J): 20' d. Mirllrnurn nurnMr of e..l. lor ~uponllood (Tobie 1018.1) J; JprO'lided e. (eil door lridlh required (Table 1005.1) Room t)l"! Sf Sf {Occupant A.sernbI)' 911 15 6U Ckmroorn15e1 20 lB4.1 I(lldlen 780 200 J.'il Sloroge J60 ~DO 0.7 G)fn J1'l7 50 6J.!) Offoce 1648 100 16.5 Medlonic:oI 858 JOO 2.9 Total oecl>POrll. oIlow,d per Code 532.7 Actual .c:hool popuIatlon..1 200 + Itoll 532111 0.2 ~ 106_5" required ,.il door width; 144" proWled ID. Ao:;",.sibility requiremll'lllJ a.Projec:trnu.tcompl)'Ic.otI)'..;lhoDIIIOnol.oc:eesslbHily caGe requirements b. Project rNlst campt)' f\olly ..;Itt Americon. with Oieobililiu Act TItle _/ADAM; rorquiremenl. 11. [mer9l1OC)' .ptem. 0.A11_911'1C)'_.,.IItn..oudioond.....oI...iIlfu.y c:amply wilt! ADA oncl lAC requirements for ...t and dlel_e b. Visual alarm. -*'olI be .)t'dIroniHd ..;th each oth... .J OJ"!;CRIPlItw Of 'llDAl( Alteration of on nlslln9 warehouse Inlo one-slOC"y school. FltI!:T>><<: r'nN!:TRur.:hDN O<<uponc)'-storoge/Warehou.. Conlltuction -IA Sprinklered Unprotected apen .1'" slludure lIUIl'Porllnt Itte- roof w/I~t-up 10" concrete IHII around @ PLAN-SCHOOL A2 SCU: l/lrol'-4f IILlIWl:-..a m,. ..... 'lII"""'lI'\U:oc1lMlC[) --.JIL1lII.-...nlll5Wltt =11II1IlI_ ______ z",.M_ 7S~If."" DWiU5IIlI .. p...,g - D IICUD - Tl<<;' D 4,3, 'Or- DLI< Civic Desigl TN Fine Me 8uIIdlng 410 Sou&hMlchlgenMRU Chk:ago.__60605 Tcl.312.322.0911 F.. 312.322.S324 _.dlkine.o:om No.1 .... I "0.- NIAGARA DUCATION SERVICES SCIENCE ACAOEI OF CHICAGO 501 MIDWAY DR MT.PROSPECT. CODE ANAL VI AND LIFE SAFI DIAGRAM ... ~- . CllQo ~- """""" ~-- "'-'" ~ o DlKCMcDelign 2IX < - I --- ) A~gbl. Buildirtg Code: I8C 2000 (sections aho,," in pCll'lMlhnes). with Village 01 Nount PrOllPect omen4mtnts 1. 'W- of pro,lcct o. R....oVCIlion of ..istin9 bu_cling. 18.454 Sf" on lir,1 level 2,Occuponc:welo...lflcollo"{~) D. Occuponc)' GrGup E. Educational J.Conslrvc:liont~(lobk1601) 0.1,...18 Jo,Exl,tin, and new .teel fl.omin9-2HR spray-on lireprooflnlJ per Ul-N736 rrgmint -.pportln9 roof only-I HR C)fl.bd. per UL-P516 (excep11n9)'T1-theroolm_20-abovef\oclr) Roo! II.ucture-l HR 9\41. bd. protection per Ul..P$16 hteri<< wall -..sl. 10. I~l-up cone. 10 ,emoin All ..I. portlUonl shall be 1 HR ,aled unless noted olher_I'1lI . Spr;nklw.)'Illems (I. Automatic IIP''''_ .pl.... '8CI\Iired for Cloup E lor 01'_ "eoter thGn 20.000 Sf (900.2.2); automatIc apl'inlder .plem pro"'ded 5. Allo..abIe IMltht and tluiclin'l oreo (Table 503) o.AlIowobI.:Jstories.26.lW)O'STp.'story b.ActUGI:1.tory.18,4S4SF 6. fireHJ)OrotlonsreqltlredondprovMled Q. e.t..... ponr.int and buildlng b. hi...,. Ol:clIpCIl'ICl' vrOUp' within bu~~ (302.3.2): e. Nonbegrin9 interior portJlione (Table 601): 0 hour d. Roor (ldlle 50'): 1 hour 7.lnt_lorwollondc:dingronishreql>ir_ts(lobl,,8OJ.4) a. v.rtled "Ill!s and passageways: Class B (HAl b.E.itoc:c..._ridouondOlrit_ys: OonC e. Room. and _1OHd 1ipOCOS: ao.s C 8. CorrldDr fn-r..btClllee rol"'9 (lobi" 100".J.2.1)' G. C'oup E wilh outomatlc sprinklor s)'litem: 0 hours ,L~rn ~illl "'\JI II II II IIII II1I 1111 U II d 9. E..,..,.. 0. EIll occ'" Irovel dbtonc:e olIowed (TobI. 1004.2...): 250' b. Minimum corridot .idth (1004.J.2,2): 72" c. Dead end corridor lifnil (1004.J.2.J): 20' d. Minim\oll'l'l noumIIer of elUts lor occupant Iood (Tobie 1018.1): J; Jproorided .. E.il door widlh req\lired (TabI. 1ooJ.2.J) Roam tW. Sf SF/Occ\lpont A..etI'Ibly gl1 15 61.1 CICIIISroom 7681 20 3841 Klt~ 780 200 J.9 SlonI9" 360 500 0.7 G)'I'I JI77 50 63.5 ome. 1648 100 16.5 ".cllooicol a5e JOO 2.9 htol occlolpanl. allowed per Code !lJ2.7 Aetlolol sehGal poputollan ..t. 200 + sloff 532.7 . 0.2 '" 106.5" r.qv;red ..It door ~Ih. ,..... provided 10, Acce..ib~;ty requ.........ts o. Projecl must comply tllll)' with all Mlinols occessibility eode'''q\lir......n\5 b. Projacl "....sl eomply flllly wllh ""'_icons with DiSGbilitios Acl TIU. M/ADMG rGqlJlrements 11. Emer'!lllncya)'llltema :~y.':t~I:= ~~t~:~Ir=t:"fo, "tf'vhtw:,~"y dlslonc:" b. \I1...at alarm. sholl b. a)01ct>rOl'liled with ...et> othi, l~ ~~"~TS CAPAOTY 12' DOOR 480 DC ANTS CAPAOTY ~nnN cv- wnRK_NlAr..lIU. FDtICAlIONAI !;f'RVlC:F'i Alterollanofon..illtirl9_etIouHinlo_-,lory,C:hOQl. naslWC CONSIRlx::m'IN o..cvpanc:y-StOl'oge/WOl'IIhOUH Con.trvctilHl -,... Sprinld....d Unpreloc:ted tip.. .teel ....ucllol'. supporting the- '001 ./t~l-up 10" COhI:rete_tl oround Iln:l".RIp1H'IN Of WDRK_COUMlINlTY CFNlFR Alterotlon of an ....1n9 worehau:se into t_-.tory community ce-nter/eultlKal cent.f.... n.. t_ will be odded wilhin ..isting struclure. nllSlWC CctlS1RUClION Occ~y-St(lf./WDrehoIlM Conalruc:tion -'A SprinkIerod @ EXITING PLAN..QVERALULOWER LEVEL lIl:.U: l/Ir-r~ )j(W CONSTRUCTION Ocaoponc)' -1.3 AuembI)' ond In Rnldenllol ContlNetion -18 (only lHR prolllClion of fool possible), FuIlyaprll'lk"'", Ellsl"'g ond n.. tlM! lraming-2HR lIpof"y-an r..."oofihoJ P'" Ul-N736. fram..g supporling root only 1HR Gw. &d. protoc:tion per IA.-P516. R_I .lructllf,,- lHR GW.Bd. protec:llan per Ul-P51l1 Ed_ior Woll- E.jst~ 10. t~t-upconc:ret. to ,....oin. All lr\terior partitions Jritl be 1HR roted unteu not'd otherwise. Stairway ",~..-8" CMU. Audilorum botcony tupporl-10" CMU. :=:n~~.rc;~-O:H ;: tluds Duct Sholl tncl__-2HR Sholl Woll-G)p.Bd. ............... _"". .. _S5 (NUC Ill_I ...JIL1W._II5U11t( = I..,... -----_ 2..,..... 1rj4......~ CI fll(l:J...,p - DIllPD ~'.l 4-~'or- DL~ Civic Desigl '...F...Ms........ .'0 SouIh MIchIpn~ ctbgo,lIlnals6D6D5 Till. 312.322.0811 ....312.322.5324 _.dIIinc.com NIAGARA DUCATION SERVICES SCIENCE ACAOEI OF CHICAGO 501 MIDWAY DR MT.PROSPECT, I CODE ANAL YS AND UFE SAFE DIAGRAM Dolo ~ "...... -.. ..-.. -.. ....... A' I A-102A o DlKCMtDesign 20IlE < - 1 -..-~. > @ EXITING PLAN..QVERALUUPPER LEVEL Sl:oU: 1~"'-4f' ............... -..... o4.-s(r\aJC0lIUllllJ ___ 1Ml1Wnlil5111Ct =11lllll:1U1lIC ______211l,....1IC b' -~ . -m lDIU5IO C III[01lQdD-DIIlCUD ~'D 4'3.rr DLIi Civic Desig lheFINMs8ui1dlng .10 Saufl Mlchlpn Awln ClIago, I.... 60&05 '''.312.322.05111 F..J12.322.5324 _.dlUnc.GOIIl No.1 DIIe NIAGARJ DUCATlO' SERVICEl SCIENCE ACAOf. OF CHICAGO 501 MIDWAY 01 MT.PROSPECT, CODE ANAL Y AND UFE SAF DIAGRAM "'" ~ ....... -.. 0-.... -.. ....... I A-103A o DLKCMcDeslgn2l: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 MIDWAY DRIVE WHEREAS, Niagara Educational Services, Inc. ("Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit with respect to property located at 501 Midway Drive, ("Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 1 in Vavrus Subdivision, being a resubdivision of part of Lot 2 in Northway Investment Subdivision of part of the. southeast X of the southeast X of Sec. 23, Township 41 North, Range 11, east of the 3fd Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, I L on December 18, 1980 as Doc. No. LR3194655. Property Index Number: 08-23-402-010; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner was granted a Conditional Use permit on the Subject Property for a Community Center on August 19, 2003, Ordinance No. 5363 and an amendment to the Conditional Use permit on February 14, 2004, Ordinance No. 5414; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has since expanded the scope of the project and the Conditional Use permit issued February 14, 2004 has expired; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to operate a 42,614 square foot Community Center and a 18,454 square foot school at 501 Midway Drive; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ-09-07 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of April, 2007, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the April 11, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-09-07; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit, as provided in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village Code, to allow the operation of a Community Center and school at 501 Midway Drive, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: Approval of the Conditional Use permit is subject to complying with the following conditions: 1. Develop the site in accordance with the plans prepared by DLK Civic Design date stamped April 16, 2007; 2. Stripe and designate one side of Midway Drive and the bulb of the cul-de-sac as "No Parking Fire Lane" as noted on the attached Exhibit "B" prepared by the Fire Department; f\ PZ-09-07, 501 Midway Drive Page 2/2 3. In accordance with the landscape plan prepared by Kostak Associates, P. C., dated December 10, 2003, and revised to reflect additional landscaping as required by Article 23 of the Village' Zoning Ordinance and the installation of 5-foot tall (minimum) evergreen type landscaping lining the perimeter of the northwest and southwest portions of the parking lot; 4. Building and Fire Codes specifically state that in determining design occupant load and means of egress requirements, the number of occupants for whom the means of egress in the facilities must be established is by the largest number computed in accordance with maximum floor area allowance per occupant as outlined by building code. This evaluation of the petition is not a complete building and fire plan compliance review as it relates to egress, occupant load, travel distance, fire-rating, separation or non-separation of mixed uses, common path of travel, accessibility, type of construction required, and allowed areas of construction. According to the Building Code, where a building contains two or more occupancies and where they share portions of the same means of egress system, those egress components shall meet the more stringent requirements of all occupancies that are shared. This petition review of use does not release the applicant, petitioner, design professionals, or contractors from specifying, designing, and constructing the project to adhere to all applicable building and fire codes that applicable at the local, state, and federal level. These comments and minor review do not constitute a complete review of the drawings and they are not approved at this time. A complete egress, Building, and Fire code review will be required for compliance with the Village's adopted Codes; 5. Submit enrollment records to the Director of Community Development on an annual basis; and 6. Develop the site plan in conformance with all Village Codes. SECTION FOUR: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of June, 2007. Richard M. Lohrstorfer Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files\WIN\ORDINANC\C.U5E.PZ09-7, 501 MidwayDrive,Niagra Foundation.doc