Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout 5.4 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COOK COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 5-YEAR UPDATE.4/15/2020 BoardDocs® Pro Agenda Item Details Meeting Nov 19, 2019 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 5. CONSENT AGENDA Subject 5.4 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COOK COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 5 -YEAR UPDATE. Access Public Type Action (Consent) Preferred Date Nov 19, 2019 Absolute Date Nov 19, 2019 Fiscal Impact No Budgeted No Budget Source Not applicable. Recommended Action Pass a resolution adopting the Cook County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. Public Content Information In 2014, Mount Prospect, along with 120 other Cook County communities, joined with Cook County to develop and adopt the Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). This coalition was formed to pool resources and create a uniform hazard mitigation strategy that could be consistently utilized by all parties to mitigate common hazards and assure eligibility for federal grant funding. The inaugural HMP produced in 2014 has been subsequently accepted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA). FEMA rules and federal law (the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000) require that the HMP be updated and re -approved by FEMA every 5 years. Mount Prospect has been working with Cook County, and 120 other communities, to prepare the required HMP Update since early 2019. Each community must adopt the HMP Update. Once the HMP Update is adopted by all the communities and approved by FEMA, the partnership will collectively and individually remain eligible to apply for hazard mitigation project funding from both the Pre -Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (PDM) and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). The Cook County Board adopted the HMP Update on September 25, 2019. Discussion This plan is designed to prepare for and lessen the impacts of specified natural hazards; responding to federal mandates in the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390). Each jurisdiction has been responsible for the review, update, and approval of their individual sections of the HMP. https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 1/2 4/15/2020 BoardDocs® Pro The HMP is a two volume document consisting of over 3,000 pages. Volume 1 can be found on the Cook County website at: https://www.cookcountyemergencymanagement.org/2019-volume-1. For reference, an executive summary of is attached. Volume 1 contains the elements of the plan common to all parties and consists of: • Plan Development and Organization • Profiles of Cook County Hazards of Concern • Planning Area Risk Ranking • Area Wide Mitigation Actions • Plan Implementation Volume 1 has been updated by Cook County Department of Homeland Security. Volume 2 is made up of the individual community's chapters, or annexes, which pertain to each particular community. Each community went through the risk analysis and prioritized the risks and mitigation actions. The Mount Prospect Annex is included as Attachment 2. The elements of the Village's Annex include: • Natural Hazard Identification for Mount Prospect • Risk Assessment of Natural Hazards affecting Mount Prospect • Risk Ranking • Identifying and Prioritizing Mitigation Actions Village staff has updated Volume 2. Updates include status changes of community profile characteristics and hazard mitigation actions. New hazard mitigation actions include conducting a flood plain study of Higgins Creek and constructing storm water detention facilities in the separate storm sewer system tributary to Levee 37. Alternatives 1. Pass a resolution adopting the Cook County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board pass a resolution adopting the Cook County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. •,. 1 ti Administrative Content Executive Content All items under Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Village Board and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a Board member or member from the audience so requests, in which the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its sequence on the agenda. Motion & Voting (not specified) Motion by Michael Zadel, second by William Grossi. Final Resolution: Motion Carries Yea: William Grossi, Eleni Hatzis, Paul Hoefert, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 2/2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE UPDATE OF THE COOK COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MI TIGA TION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within our community; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes the importance of reducing or eliminated vulnerability to disasters caused by natural hazards for the overall good and welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2000, the U.S. Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 ("Act") which provided the legal framework for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mitigation, planning requirements for state, local and tribal governments as a condition of mitigation grant assistance emphasizing the need for pre -disaster mitigation of potential hazards; and WHEREAS, as a condition of future funding for mitigation projects, the Act requires jurisdictions to prepare and adopt a hazard mitigation plan to identify and address certain vulnerabilities that exist prior to and during a disaster; and WHEREAS, FEMA supports post -disaster grant funding through the Hazard Mitigation Plan Grant program, which has as a condition of funding eligibility, a requirement for jurisdictions to prepare and adopt a hazard mitigation plan; and WHEREAS, to maintain continued eligibility for FEMA mitigation grant assistance programs the Act requires a hazard mitigation plan be updated every five years; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Act's requirements, 121 Cook County jurisdictions engaged in the FEMA -prescribed mitigation planning process to prepare the 2019 Plan and its associated local hazard mitigation plan annexes; and WHEREAS, the 2019 Plan has been approved by the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region V. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING PURSUANT TO ITS HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect hereby accepts, approves and adopts in its entirety, Volume 1, the Countywide Mitigation Actions in Volume 2; and the Village of Mount Prospect Jurisdictional Annex of Volume 2 of the 2019 Cook County Multi - Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect will continue to participate in the updating and revision of the 2019 Plan with another plan review and revision to occur within a five-year cycle, and designate staff will provide annual progress reports on the status of implementation of the 2019 Plan to the Mayor and Board of Trustees. SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval i n the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PASSED and APPROVED this day of November, 2019. Arlene A. J u racek Mayor ATTEST: Karen M. Agoranos Village Clerk Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Executive Summary - July 2019 Hazard mitigation is the use of long-term and short-term policies, programs, projects, and other activities to alleviate the death, injury, and property damage that can result from a disaster. Cook County and a coalition of 121 municipal planning partners prepared and updated the 2019 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan in order to identify the risks posed by hazards and find ways to reduce their impacts. The plan reduces risks for those who live in, work in, and visit the County. 1. Cook County Profile Cook County is located in northeast Illinois on the western shore of Lake Michigan. It is the most populous of the 102 counties in Illinois, with a 2018 estimated population of 5.18 million. In terms of area, it is the sixth largest county, covering approximately 945 square miles. Cook County makes up roughly 41 percent of the population of Illinois. The surrounding counties are Lake and McHenry to the north, Kane, and DuPage to the west, and Will to the southwest. Lake Michigan is the county's eastern border along with the State of Indiana. Cook County is the second most populous county in the United States, after Los Angeles County. The county contains 135 municipalities, covering about 85 percent of the area of the county. The remaining unincorporated areas are under the jurisdiction of the Cook County Board of Commissioners, a 17 - member board elected by district. The planning area's economy is strongly based in the educational services, health care, and social assistance industry, followed by the professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste management industries. Major businesses include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Government, Advocate Health System, JPMorgan Chase, Jewel -Osco, United Airlines, Abbott Laboratories, American Airlines, and Walgreens. Major educational and research institutions in the county include Northwestern University, Loyola University, DePaul University, the University of Chicago, and the University of Illinois at Chicago. Cook County has experienced 19 hazard events since 1967 for which federal disaster declarations were issued. The Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States (SHELDUS), maintained by the University of South Carolina, includes many more hazard events. For Cook County, SHELDUS lists 851 instances of direct property, crop, monetary, or human loss due to a hazard event from 1960 through 2017 - an average of approximately 15 various direct loss events per year. 1 2. Participating Partners The responsibility for hazard mitigation lies with many, including private property owners; business and industry; and local, state, and the federal government. Through multi -jurisdictional partnerships, local jurisdictions within an area that has uniform risk exposure can pool resources and eliminate redundant planning activities. Cook County opened this planning effort to all municipalities within the County. The table, Planning Partners, lists the planning partners that participated in the planning process and are covered under this plan. The planning area was defined as all incorporated and unincorporated areas of Cook County as well as the incorporated areas of cities that cross county boundaries. The planning area boundary is shown in the figure below (Figure: Planning Area). 2 Municipalities that are partially in Cook County and are participating in the mitigation planning efforts of adjacent counties are also included in the table below. Future efforts are already underway to include these jurisdictions in future updates of the plan. Six jurisdictions that had not previously participated in the 2014 Cook County MJ -HMP are now part of the 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP. TABLE: PLANNING PARTNERS PLANNING PARTNERS COVERED BY THIS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN North Central South Arlington Heights Bellwood Alsip Barrington Berkeley Bedford Park Bartlett Berwyn Blue Island Des Plaines Broadview Bridgeview Elk Grove Village Brookfield Burbank Evanston City of Chicago Burnham Glencoe Cicero Calumet City Glenview Countryside Calumet Park Golf Elmwood Park Chicago Heights Hanover Park Forest Park Chicago Ridge Hoffman Estates Forest View Country Club Hills Inverness Franklin Park Crestwood Kenilworth Harwood Heights Dixmoor Lincolnwood Hillside Dolton Morton Grove Hodgkins East Hazel Crest Mount Prospect Indian Head Park Evergreen Park Niles LaGrange Flossmoor Northbrook LaGrange Park Ford Heights Northfield Lyons Glenwood Palatine Maywood Harvey Park Ridge McCook Hazel Crest Prospect Heights Melrose Park Hickory Hills Rolling Meadows Norridge Hometown Schaumburg Northlake Homewood Skokie North Riverside Justice South Barrington Oak Park Lansing Streamwood River Forest Lemont Wheeling River Grove Lynwood Wilmette Riverside Markham Winnetka Rosemont Matteson Schiller Park Merrionette Park Stickney Midlothian Stone Park Oak Forest Summit Oak Lawn Westchester Olympia Fields Western Springs Orland Hills Orland Park Palos Heights Palos Hills Palos Park Park Forest Phoenix Posen Richton Park Riverdale Robbins Sauk Village South Chicago Heights South Holland Steger Thornton Tinley Park University Park Willow Springs Worth Not Participating in 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP Not Participating in 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP Not Participating in 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP Barrington Hills Bensenville Frankfort Buffalo Grove Burr Ridge Woodridge Deerfield Elmhurst Deer Park Hinsdale East Dundee Oak Brook Elgin Roselle The 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP was updated by a planning team of Cook County Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management staff and expert consultants, with guidance from a steering committee representing the planning partners and other local stakeholders. The key steps in updating the plan were as follows: 1. Determine the Planning Area and Resources 2. Build and Reconvene the Planning Team 3. Outreach Strategy 4. Review and Update Community Capabilities 5. Update and Conduct the Risk Assessment 6. Update the Mitigation Strategy 7. Keep the Plan Current 8. Review and Adopt the Plan 9. Create a Safe and Resilient Community 4. Mission Goals and Objectives The defined mission for the 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP is to "Identify risks and sustainable, cost-effective actions to mitigate the impact of natural hazards to protect the life, health, safety, welfare, and economy of the communities of Cook County." Mitigation goals were established as follows: 1. Develop and implement sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally sound risk -reduction (mitigation) projects. 2. Protect the lives, health, safety, and property of the citizens of Cook County from the impacts of natural hazards. 3. Protect public services and critical facilities, including infrastructure, from loss of use during natural hazard events and potential damage from such activities. 4. Involve stakeholders to enhance the local capacity to mitigate, prepare for, and respond to the impacts of natural hazards. 5. Develop, promote, and integrate mitigation action plans. 6. Promote public understanding of and support for hazard mitigation. Thirteen objectives were established for the plan that meets multiple goals, serving as stand-alone measurements of the effectiveness of the mitigation action. Proposed mitigation actions were evaluated in part based on how many goals and objectives they would help to fulfill. 0 1. Eliminate or minimize disruption of local government operations caused by natural hazards through all phases of emergency management. 2. Increase the resilience of (or protect and maintain) infrastructure and critical facilities. 3. Consider the impacts of natural hazards on future land uses in the planning area, including possible impacts from climate change. 4. Integrate hazard mitigation policies into land use plans in the planning area. 5. Develop, improve, and protect systems that provide early warnings, emergency response communications, and evacuation procedures. 6. Use the best available data, science and technologies to educate the public and to improve understanding of the location and potential impacts of natural hazards, the vulnerability of building types and community development patterns, and the measures needed to protect life safety. 7. Retrofit, purchase, or relocate structures in high hazard areas, including those known to be repetitively damaged. 8. Establish partnerships among all levels of local government, the private sector, and/or nongovernmental organizations to improve and implement methods to protect people and property. 9. Provide or improve flood protection on a watershed basis with flood control structures and drainage maintenance plans. 10. Strengthen codes and land use planning and their enforcement, so that new construction or redevelopment can avoid or withstand the impacts of natural hazards. 11. Encourage mitigation through incentive -based programs, such as the Community Rating System, Firewise, and StormReady programs. 12. Reduce natural hazard -related risks and vulnerability to potentially isolated populations within the planning area. 13. Encourage hazard mitigation measures that result in the least adverse effect on the natural environment and that use natural processes. 5. Hazards Addressed The steering committee considered the full range of natural hazards that could impact the planning area and identified the following hazards as presenting the most significant concern: • Dam or levee failure • Drought • Earthquake • Flood • Severe weather • Severe winter weather 31 • Tornado Detailed risk assessments were performed for each of these hazards of concern. Also, a brief qualitative review was conducted of technological and human -caused hazards of interest, which included the following: epidemic or pandemic, nuclear power plant incident, secondary impacts from incoming evacuees, widespread power outage, hazardous material incident, and coastal erosion. Climate Change was addressed for each hazard, as applicable. 6. Risk Assessment Methodology The risk assessments of the identified hazards of concern describe the risks associated with each hazard. The following steps were used to define the risk of each hazard: • Profile and update each hazard, describing the geographic area it affects, its frequency and severity, and the warning time provided before a hazard event occurs. • Use maps of hazard impact areas, as appropriate, to determine and update how many structures, facilities, and systems are exposed to each hazard. • Assess the vulnerability of exposed structures and infrastructure based on exposure and the probability of occurrence of a hazard event. Tools such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) hazard modeling program called Hazus-MH were used to perform this assessment for flood, dam failure, earthquake hazards, and tornado. Outputs similar to those from Hazus-MH were generated for other hazards, using maps generated by the Hazus-MH program. A detailed inventory of critical facilities and infrastructure were reevaluated for this plan using GIS applications. Over 6,000 facilities were inventoried and uploaded into the Hazus-MH model to support the risk assessment. 7. Profiles of Cook County Hazards of Concern The following hazards are addressed in the 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP. A brief description of each hazard is included in this section of the Executive Summary. liq There are 40 dams in Cook County, all regulated by the Water Resources Division of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). Importantly, 24 of these dams are classified as "high" (10) or "significant" (14) hazard, which means they have significant downstream populations at risk if the dam should fail. Flooding as a result of a dam and levee failure would significantly impact properties and communities in the inundation zones. No records of dam failures in the planning area are available, however. There are also nine levee systems in Cook County. Although there is no history of levee failures in the planning area, it should be noted that the State of Illinois experienced levee failures in 1993 and 2008. In 1993, 17 levee systems breached along the Mississippi River and the Illinois River just north of where it meets the Mississippi River. Over 237,000 acres along the rivers were flooded. Warning time for dam or levee failure varies depending on the cause of the failure. In events of extreme precipitation or massive snowmelt, evacuations can be planned with sufficient time. In the event of a 7 structural failure due to an earthquake, there may be no warning time. Cook County and its planning partners have established protocols for flood warning and response for dam failure in the flood warning portion of its adopted emergency operations plan. These protocols are tied to the emergency action plans created by the dam owners. Important issues associated with dam and levee failure include the following: Federally regulated dams have an adequate level of oversight and sophistication in their emergency action plans. However, the protocol for notifying downstream citizens of imminent failure needs to be tied to local emergency response planning. Mapping that estimates inundation depths is needed for non -federal -regulated dams to better assess the risk associated with dam failure from these facilities. Most dam failure mapping required at federal levels requires determination of the probable maximum flood, which is a worst-case scenario and generally the event with the lowest probability of occurrence. For non -federal -regulated dams, mapping of dam failure scenarios that are less extreme than the probable maximum flood but have a higher probability of occurrence could better illustrate areas potentially impacted by more frequent events to support emergency response and preparedness. The concept of residual risk associated with structural flood control projects should be considered in the design of capital projects and the application of land use regulations. Addressing security concerns and the need to inform the public of the risk associated with dam failure is a challenge for public officials. Not all levees are reflected in the current flood mapping, which makes complete delineation of the hazard area difficult. Droughts originate from a deficiency of precipitation resulting from an unusual weather pattern. If the weather pattern lasts a short time (a few weeks or a couple of months), the drought is considered short- term. If the weather pattern becomes entrenched and the precipitation deficits last for several months or years, the drought is considered to be long-term. Drought generally affects large geographic areas, so drought descriptions in the hazard mitigation plan are usually for the entire State of Illinois rather than the immediate planning area of Cook County. The most severe droughts in Illinois occurred in the summer of 1934, the summer of 1931 and 1954. All three of these events were categorized as extreme droughts. More recently, in September 1983, all 102 counties were declared state disaster areas because of high temperatures and insufficient precipitation. In 1988, 54 percent of the state was impacted by drought -like conditions, resulting in disaster relief payments to landowners and farmers exceeding $382 million. Historical drought data for the planning area indicate there have been at least seven (7) significant droughts in the last 115 years, which equates to a drought every 16 years on average, or a minimum of a 6.25 -percent chance of a drought in any given year. Drought can have a widespread impact on the environment and the economy, although it typically does not result in loss of life or damage to property, as do other natural disasters. The National Drought Mitigation Center describes likely drought impacts as those affecting agriculture, water supplies, and the risk of fire. 0 Scientists at this time do not know how to predict drought more than a month in advance for most locations. How long a drought lasts depends on interactions between the atmosphere and the oceans, soil moisture and land surface processes, topography, internal dynamics, and the accumulated influence of weather systems on the global scale. Crucial issues associated with drought include the following: • Identification and development of alternative water supplies • Use of groundwater recharge techniques to stabilize the groundwater supply • The probability of increased drought frequencies and durations due to climate change • The promotion of active water conservation even during non -drought periods. 7.3. Earthquake An earthquake is the vibration of the earth's surface following a release of energy in the earth's crust. Earthquakes tend to occur along faults, which are zones of weakness in the crust. Earthquakes occur throughout Illinois, with most in the southern third of the state. Over 360 earthquakes have occurred in Illinois during the past 20 years, with 32 resulting in damage. Fifteen events have been recorded in Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, and Will Counties since 1704. Cook County has experienced three earthquakes ranging from a magnitude of 3 (categorized as "minor") to 4.9 (categorized as "light"). The actual movement of the ground in an earthquake is seldom the direct cause of injury or death. Casualties generally result from falling objects and debris, because the shocks shake, damage or demolish buildings and other structures. Disruption of communications, electrical power supplies and gas, sewer and water lines should be expected. Earthquakes may trigger fires, dam failures, or releases of hazardous material, compounding their effects. Any seismic activity of 6.0 or greater on faults within the planning area would have significant impacts throughout the county. Earthquakes of this magnitude or higher would lead to a massive failure of structures built on loose soils. Levees and revetments constructed on such soils would likely fail, representing a loss of critical infrastructure. These events could cause secondary hazards, including mudslides, that would further damage structures. There is currently no reliable way to predict an earthquake at any given location with any significant warning time. Research is being done with warning systems that use the low energy waves that precede major earthquakes to give approximately 40 seconds notice that a major earthquake is about to occur. The warning time is very short but it could allow for someone to get under a desk, step away from a hazardous material they are working with or shut down a computer system. Important issues associated with earthquakes include the following: The public perception of the earthquake risk within the planning area is low. It can be difficult to get the public to think about earthquake mitigation with little or no perceived risk. Most of the planning area's building stock was built prior to 1975 when seismic provisions became uniformly applied through building code applications. A building stock analysis that looks at the potential fragility of the older building stock constructed without building code influence would be beneficial in the identification of seismic mitigation projects. • More earthquake mapping is needed for the planning area. 9 • Critical facility owners/operators should be encouraged to create or enhance continuity of operations plans using the information on risk and vulnerability contained in the Cook County hazard mitigation plan. • Geotechnical standards should be established that take into account the probable impacts of earthquakes in the design and construction of new or enhanced facilities. • The County has over 6 miles of earthen levees and revetments on soft, unstable soil. These soils are prone to liquefaction, which would severely undermine the integrity of these facilities. • There are a large number of earthen dams within the planning area. Dam failure warning and evacuation plans and procedures should be reviewed and updated to reflect the dams' risk potential associated with earthquake activity in the region. Flood Types and History Two types of flooding are typical in Cook County: riverine flooding when water overflows the banks of a stream; and stormwater/urban drainage flooding, when storm runoff exceeds the capacity of local drainage systems in place to convey stormwater to a receiving body. 231 flooding events (including flood, flash flood, coastal flood, and heavy rains) have occurred in Cook County from 1996 to 2019. Flood events of historical significance occurred in the Cook County region in 1849, 1855, 1885, 1938, 19521 19541? 19571 19611 1973, 1979, 1986, 1987, 1996, 2001, 2004, 2010, 2011, and 2013. Since 1972, 13 presidential -declared flood events in the County have caused over $628.5 million in property damage. In the past 20 years, stormwater/urban drainage flooding has become the principal cause of flood losses in the Cook County planning area. Urban portions of the county annually experience nuisance flooding related to drainage issues. After flooding in August 2010, FEMA provided more than $435 million in disaster recovery, response, and mitigation in Cook and DuPage Counties, and more than 75 percent of this went to individual homeowners, most of whom suffered sewer back-ups and basement flooding caused by stormwater/urban drainage flooding. The frequency and the magnitude of stormwater/urban drainage flooding in Cook County dictated the assignment of stormwater management within the County to a single entity—the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD). Cook County experiences numerous episodes of the river and urban flooding every year; massive floods that can cause significant property damage typically occur every three to seven years. Flood Mapping Flood studies use historical records to determine the probability of occurrence for different river discharge (flow) levels. The flood frequency equals 100 divided by the discharge probability. For example, the 100 -year discharge has a 1 -percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The extent of flooding associated with a 1 -percent annual probability of occurrence (the base flood or 100 -year flood) is used as a regulatory boundary by many agencies. This boundary is a convenient tool for assessing risk in flood -prone communities. For most communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), FEMA has prepared a detailed Flood Insurance Study that presents water surface elevations for the 1- percent annual chance flood and the 0.2 -percent annual chance flood (the 500 -year flood). The boundaries of the 100- and 500 -year floodplains are shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 10 FEMA has mapped over 78 square miles of the 100 -year floodplain and 99 square miles of 500 -year floodplain along 172 watercourses in the Cook County planning area. Approximately 8 percent of the County is located within mapped 100 -year floodplains. As is the case for many communities, there is a need for updated maps that better reflect the actual flood risk. MWRD has created inundation maps, which may be a good resource for some communities. It should be noted that mapping showing areas of urban flooding is limited in the County. Flood Severity The principal factors affecting flood damage are flood depth and velocity. The deeper and faster flood flows become, the more damage they can cause. Shallow flooding with high velocities can cause as much damage as deep flooding with slow velocity, is especially true when a channel migrates over a broad floodplain, redirecting high -velocity flows and transporting debris and sediment. The worst-case scenario for flooding in the Cook County planning area has happened numerous times in the past. It involves intense rainstorms that stall over the planning area, dropping rainfall totals in excess 6 inches over 48 hours (this scenario is significantly exacerbated by the presence of snowpack on the ground), which leads to both riverine and stormwater/urban drainage flooding that can overwhelm flood response capabilities in the planning area. Significant roads can be blocked, preventing critical access for many residents and critical functions. High in -channel flows can cause water courses to scour, possibly washing out roads and creating more isolation problems. Flood Warning The Cook County flood threat system consists of a network of precipitation gages throughout the watershed and stream gages at strategic locations that continuously monitor and report stream levels. All of this information is analyzed by agencies such as the Cook County Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District to evaluate the flood threat and possible evacuation needs. Floods are generally classed as either slow -rise or flash floods. Due to the sequential pattern of meteorological conditions needed to cause serious slow -rise flooding, it is unusual for a slow -rise flood to occur without warning. Slow -rise floods may be preceded by a warning time from several hours, to days, to possibly weeks. Evacuation and sandbagging for a slow -rise flood may lessen flood damage. Flash floods are more difficult to prepare for, due to the extremely short warning time given, if any. Flash flood warnings usually require evacuation within an hour. However, potential hazard areas can be warned in advance of potential flash flooding danger. Participation in Federal Flood Programs The NFIP makes federally backed flood insurance available to homeowners, renters, and business owners in participating communities. Cook County entered the NFIP on April 15, 1981. The effective date for the current countywide Flood Insurance Rate Map is August 19, 2008. In addition to the County, most Cook County municipalities participate in the NFIP. As of October 2018, Cook County had 14,790 flood insurance policies providing $3.092 billion in insurance coverage. According to FEMA statistics, in the State of Illinois, there were 51,246 total losses (claims) between January 1, 1978, and January 31, 2019, for a total of approximately $545.36 million, an average of roughly $10,642 per claim. 11 Twenty-four communities in the planning area also participate in the Community Rating System (CRS) a voluntary program that encourages floodplain management activities that exceed the NFIP requirements. The CRS requires participating communities to identify repetitive loss areas, where flood insurance claims have been paid multiple times for individual properties. There are 1,775 such properties in Cook County as of October 2018. Issues Important issues associated with flooding include the following: • The 2-D, unsteady -state modeling performed by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District is considered to be the best available flood risk data for the planning area, but it is not the basis of FEMA's current effective Flood Insurance Rate Map. The District's flood hazard data should be formatted so that can be used to support risk assessment and thus validate best available data. • The planning area has a large percentage of policies and losses outside a mapped hazard area. Basement flooding is a common problem. • The stormwater/urban drainage flooding risk is not mapped, which makes it difficult to assess this hazard, other than looking at historical loss data. • The risk associated with the flood hazard overlaps the risk associated with other hazards such as an earthquake. This provides an opportunity to seek mitigation alternatives with multiple objectives that can reduce the risk for multiple hazards. • There is no consistency of land -use practices and regulatory floodplain management within the planning area. It is unclear how potential climate change may impact flood conditions in the planning area. • The concept of residual risk should be considered in the design of future capital flood control projects and should be communicated with residents living in the floodplain. • More information is needed on flood risk to support the concept of risk-based analysis of capital projects. • There needs to be a sustained effort to gather historical damage data, such as high water marks on structures and damage reports, to measure the cost-effectiveness of future mitigation projects. • Ongoing flood hazard mitigation will require funding from multiple sources. • There needs to be a coordinated hazard mitigation effort between jurisdictions affected by flood hazards in the county. • Floodplain residents need to continue to be educated about flood preparedness and the resources available during and after floods. • The promotion of flood insurance as a means of protecting private property owners from the economic impacts of frequent flood events should continue. • The economy affects a jurisdiction's ability to manage its floodplains. Budget cuts and personnel losses can strain the resources needed to support floodplain management. Severe weather refers to any dangerous meteorological phenomena with the potential to cause damage, serious social disruption, or loss of human life. It includes hail, heat, excessive heat, lightning, hail, fog, and high, strong, and thunderstorm winds. Severe -weather events can happen anywhere in the planning area. Severe local storms are probably the most common widespread hazard. They affect large numbers of people throughout Cook County and the surrounding region when they occur. The heat 12 wave of July 1995 was one of the worst disasters in Illinois history, with over 700 deaths statewide over five -days. Records from the National Climatic Data Center indicate approximately 1,386 severe weather events (not including heat and excessive heat events) in the planning area between 1950 and 2018 occurring between 503 separate days. NCDC data from 1996 to 2018 also records 57 heat or excessive heat events. This means that Cook County can expect approximately 9 days every year where at least one severe weather event is occurring. More specifically, this represents an average of approximately 11 thunderstorm wind, 7 hail, 3 heat or excessive heat, 1 lightning, and 1 high or strong wind event every year. According to the 2018 Illinois Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan, the planning area is designated as severely vulnerable to severe storms, with a high vulnerability to extreme heat as well. There were no significant fog events recorded for Cook County in the NCDC - NOAA data. The most common problems associated with severe storms are immobility and loss of utilities. Roads may become impassable due to flooding, downed trees, or a landslide. Power lines may be downed due to high winds, and services such as water or phone may not be able to operate without power. Lightning can cause severe damage and injury. A worst-case severe -weather event would involve prolonged high winds during a thunderstorm. Such an event would have both short-term and longer-term effects. Initially, schools and roads would be closed due to power outages caused by high winds and downed tree obstructions. In more rural areas, some subdivisions could experience limited ingress and egress. Prolonged rain could produce flooding and overtopped culverts with ponded water on roads. Flooding could further obstruct roads and bridges, further isolating residents. Meteorologists can often predict the likelihood of a severe storm or other severe weather events, which can give several days of warning time. The Chicago Office of the National Weather Service issues severe storm watches and warnings when appropriate to alert government agencies and the public of possible or impending weather events. The watches and warnings are broadcast over NOAA weather radio and are forwarded to the local media for re -transmission using the Emergency Alert System. Important issues associated with severe weather include the following: • Redundancy of power supply throughout the planning area must be evaluated. The capacity for backup power generation is limited. • Public education on dealing with the impacts of severe weather needs to be provided and debris management (downed trees, etc.) must be addressed. • The effects of climate change may result in an increase in the frequency of extreme heat events. The severe winter weather hazard encompasses heavy snow, lake -effect snow, blizzards, ice storms, sleet, cold/windchill, extreme cold temperatures and wind chill, frost/freeze, general winter weather, and winter storms. Severe winter weather events can happen anywhere in the planning area. NOAA identifies 178 of these severe winter weather events in the planning area from 1950 - 2018, excluding snowstorms classified as less than major snowstorms. The planning area typically receives 34 inches of snow each year and can expect to experience exposure to a severe winter weather event at least annually. 178 severe winter weather events were reported between 01/01/1950 and 06/01/2019, although Cold/Windchill and Extreme Cold/Windchill were not recorded in available data sets until 1997 and 13 2006, respectively. There have likely been many more of these events before those dates that were not recorded by the NCDC data. All events totaled $700,000 in property damage, 156 direct deaths and 8 indirect deaths, and 5 direct injuries and 3 indirect injuries. Severe winter weather impacts can be significant. Roads may become impassable due to ice or snow. Power lines may be downed due to high winds or ice accumulation, and services such as water or phone may not be able to operate without power. Physical damage to homes and facilities can occur from wind damage or accumulation of snow or ice. Freezing rain can cause the most dangerous conditions. Ice buildup can bring down trees, communication towers, and wires, creating hazards for property owners, motorists, and pedestrians alike. Many severe winter weather events in the planning area have resulted in the loss of life. Meteorologists can often predict likely severe winter weather, giving several days of warning time. The National Weather Service provides public warnings on storm, snow and ice events as appropriate to alert government agencies and the public of possible or impending weather events. Watches and warnings are broadcast over NOAA weather radio and are forwarded to local media for re -transmission using the Emergency Alert System. Important issues associated with severe winter weather in the planning area include the following: • The older building stock in the planning area is built to low code standards or none at all. These structures could be highly vulnerable to severe winter weather events such as windstorms. • Redundancy of power supply must be evaluated. • The capacity for backup power generation is limited. • Isolated population centers are at significant risk. Tornadoes are the most violent of all atmospheric storms, and all of Illinois is susceptible to them, including Cook County. The tornado season runs March through August, although a tornado can occur in the state at any time. Many tornadoes have struck Cook County, including several within the Chicago city limits. According to NCDC data, there were 54 tornado and three funnel cloud events from 1954 to 2018, which totaled $118,337,750 in property damage, 39 deaths, and 770 injuries. The F4 -rated Oak Lawn tornado in April 1967 was the deadliest tornado in the planning area, with 33 fatalities. The only F5 tornado to ever strike the Chicago area was on August 28, 1990, which additionally impacted Will and Kendall Counties. In total, 29 direct deaths, 350 injuries, and 250 million in property damage was recorded. Tornadoes can cause fatalities and devastate a neighborhood in seconds. Winds can reach 300 mph, and damage paths can be more than a mile wide and 50 miles long. If a major tornado were to strike within the populated areas of Cook County, the damage could be widespread. Businesses could be forced to close for an extended period or permanently, fatalities could be high, many people could be homeless for an extended period, and routine services such as telephone or power could be disrupted. Buildings can be damaged or destroyed. The local NWS office issues a tornado watch when tornadoes are possible in an area and a tornado warning when a tornado has been sighted or indicated by weather radar. The current average lead time for tornado warnings is 13 minutes. The National Weather Service has established a goal of 15 minutes 14 in its strategic plan. Occasionally, tornadoes develop so rapidly that little, if any, advance warning is possible. Important issues associated with tornadoes in the planning area include the following: • The older building stock in the planning area is built to low code standards or none at all. These structures could be highly vulnerable to tornadoes. • Redundancy of power supply must be evaluated. The capacity for backup power generation is limited. • The amount of the tornado zone that contains vacant, developable land is not known and would be valuable information for gauging the future development potential of the tornado zone. • Declining growth rate makes it difficult for code standards to have impacts on new development. The planning area has insufficient suitable tornado shelters. • Public awareness of tornado response protocols is a concern, given the area's many visitors. 8. Planning Area Risk Ranking Risk rankings were performed by each planning partner to compare the probable impacts of the hazards of concern. For each community, the rankings assessed the probability of each hazard's occurrence as well as its likely impact on people, property, and the economy. The results of the countywide ranking, which were used in establishing mitigation action and priorities, are summarized below. TABLE: HAZARD RISK RANKING Hazard Ranking Hazard Event Category 1 Severe Winter Weather High 2 Severe Weather High 3 Flood (including urban flooding) High 4 Earthquake Medium 5 Tornado Medium 6 Drought Low 7 liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillilliillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillilillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliilimillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilllllllllI Dam Failure Low 9. Mitigation Strategies The heart of the mitigation plan is the mitigation strategy, which serves as the long-term blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in the risk assessment. The mitigation strategy describes how Cook County and the participating jurisdictions will accomplish the overall purpose, or mission, of the planning process. As part of the update process, mitigation goals and objectives were reevaluated; and mitigation actions/projects were updated/amended, identified, evaluated, and prioritized. A total of 367 new mitigation projects were identified by the County and participating jurisdictions. 15 10. Plan Maintenance Strategy The hazard mitigation plan includes a formal process to ensure that the 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP remains an active and relevant document and that the planning partners maintain their eligibility for relevant funding sources. The plan's format allows sections to be reviewed and updated when new data become available, resulting in a plan that will remain current and relevant. The strategy for ongoing maintenance of the plan includes the following components: Plan Implementation—Plan implementation and evaluation will be a shared responsibility among all planning partners and agencies identified as lead agencies in the mitigation action plans. Cook County DHSEM will assume lead responsibility for implementing the plan maintenance strategy. Steering Committee—It is recommended that a steering committee remain a viable body involved in key elements of the plan maintenance strategy. The steering committee will strive to include representation from the planning partners, as well as other stakeholders in the planning area. Annual Progress Report—The steering committee will convene to perform annual reviews. DHSEM will then prepare a formal annual report on the progress of the plan. Plan Update—The planning partnership intends to update the hazard mitigation plan on a five-year cycle from the date of initial plan adoption. Continuing Public Involvement—The public will continue to be apprised of the plan's progress through the Cook County hazard mitigation website and by copies of annual progress reports provided to the media. DHSEM has agreed to maintain the hazard mitigation plan website, and each planning partner has agreed to provide links to the website on their jurisdictional websites. Incorporation into Other Planning Mechanisms—All municipal planning partners are committed to creating a linkage between the hazard mitigation plan and their comprehensive plans by identifying a mitigation action as such and giving that action a high priority. As information becomes available from other planning mechanisms that can enhance this plan, that information will be incorporated via the update process. 11. Plan Adoption The 2019 Cook County MJ -HMP will be submitted for apre-adoption review to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and FEMA before adoption by Cook County. Once pre -adoption approval has been provided, all planning partners will formally adopt the plan. 16 • 1 • i Ilk, 10 0 � � � I � � 16T1" Mount Prospect Annex FINAL July 2019 Prepared for: Cook County Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 69 W. Washington St., Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Toni Preckwinkle President Cook County Board of Commissioners William Barnes Executive Director Cook County Department of Homeland Security & Emergency Management Table of Contents Hazard Mitigation Point of Contact............................................................................................................. 3 JurisdictionProfile....................................................................................................................................... 4 CapabilityAssessment................................................................................................................................. 6 Jurisdiction -Specific Natural Hazard Event................................................................................................ 10 HazardRisk Ranking................................................................................................................................... 12 Mitigation Strategies and Actions.............................................................................................................. 13 NewMitigation Actions......................................................................................................................... 17 OngoingMitigation Actions................................................................................................................... 22 Completed Mitigation Actions............................................................................................................... 31 Future Needs to Better Understand Risk/Vulnerability........................................................................ 35 AdditionalComments.............................................................................................................................. 36 HAZUS-MH Risk Assessment Results......................................................................................................... 37 HazardMapping........................................................................................................................................ 39 Hazard Mitigation Point of Contact Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Jeffrey A. Wulbecker, Village Engineer Brian Lambel., Fire Chief 1700 West Central Road 112 East Northwest Highway Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Telephone: 847-590-8808 Telephone: 847-818-5334 Email Address:,j.I bec.k.@ ��!..p ................................................................... ........... ... !2.[g ... .... ......... Email Address: Uamb- e.. ............... .................................................................................... Jurisdiction Profile The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction and its history: • Date of Incorporation: 1917 • Current Population: 54,198 as of 2018 US Census population estimate. • Population Growth: The Village of Mount Prospect has experienced a relatively flat growth rate with no significant change in population from 2010 to 2018. • Location and Description: The Village of Mount Prospect is a suburb 22 miles northwest from downtown Chicago. It is bordered by Prospect Heights to the north, 1-90 and Elk Grove Village to the south, Des Plaines to the east and Arlington Heights to the west. The center of town is at the intersection of US Route 14 and Illinois Route 83. The Union Pacific Northwest rail lines run through the center of town. There is a Metra train station at 11 E Northwest Hwy. Mount Prospect has a land area of 10.37 square miles. • Brief History: The original inhabitants of the area that encompasses Mount Prospect today were Native Americans. Yankees were the first American settlers to the area, but they were the second group. German immigrants had the most significant impact in terms of population and cultural traditions. In 1850, the train rolled into town. This led to an increasing specialization in the farming community. Not long after the train station was built, others began building stores and houses downtown and made the Village of Mount Prospect come to life. In 1917, Mount Prospect reached a population of 300 and was incorporated. From there, the largest growth came during land speculations in the 1920s and then the suburban movements that followed World War 11. The baby boom expanded the population and the Village began expanding the services it offered. In the early 1960s, the business community in Mount Prospect took a leap forward with the construction of Randhurst, the first indoor air-conditioned mall in the upper Midwest. Another major event was the development of Kensington Business Center, which has been the home to national and international firms including NTN Bearing, Searle, Braun Manufacturing Cummins -Allison Corp., and ITT Technical Institute. In the 1990s and 2000s attention was turned to downtown redevelopment. • Climate: Mount Prospect's climate is typical of suburban Chicago and the Midwest in general. Average rainfall is 32 inches per year and average snowfall is 24 inches. The average year round temperature is 48.2 degrees. In July the average high temperature is 83 degrees and in January the average low temperature is 11 degrees. The average humidity is 72.27% • Governing Body Format: The Village of Mount Prospect is governed by a Village President and a 6 member Board of Trustees. This body will assume the responsibility for the adoption and implementation of this plan. The Village consists of six departments: Community Development, Finance, Human Services, Fire, Police and Public Works. The Village has 12 committees and commissions that report to the Village Board. • Development Trends: The Village continues to see significant development activity in the commercial sector including the recent redevelopment of Randhurst Village (1,000,000 square foot regional center), expansion efforts by national retailers such as Walmart and Menards, and the refurbishing of Mount Prospect Plaza (300,000 square feet). The industrial/office sector has not increased development but United Airlines and CVS/Caremark recently constructed two large facilities in the Village. UAL constructed a 200,000 square foot data center that will serve their entire international operations. CVS occupied a 175,000 square foot facility to operate their mail order prescription services. After a 5 -year lull in residential construction activity, the Village has issued permits for two multi -family projects in the downtown district. In addition, a 92 -unit senior independent living facility is under construction and is scheduled to be complete by mid -2020. As of 2019, there are many current projects in Mount Prospect including 2 senior housing developments, gas station, industrial and commercial development, rowhomes and luxury apartments. Capability Assessment The assessment of the jurisdiction's legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in the Legal and Regulatory Capability Table below. The assessment of the jurisdiction's fiscal capabilities is presented in the Fiscal Capability Table below. The assessment of the jurisdiction's administrative and technical capabilities is presented in the Administrative and Technical Capability Table below. Information on the community's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in the National Flood Insurance Program Compliance Table below. Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in the Community Classifications Table below. ABLE: LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY Local State or Other State Authorit Federal Jurisdictional Mandated Comments Prohibitions Authority Codes, Ordinances & Requirements Building Code Yes No lNo No lNo Yes Chapter 21, 2013 Zonings Yes Yes Chapter 14, 1993 Subdivisions Yes No No No Chapter 15, 2002 State regulates industrial Stormwater Management Yes No Yes Yes activity from Construction sites 1 acre or larger under section 402 CWA. Chapter 16, 2002 Post Disaster Recovery No No No No Real Estate Disclosure Yes No Yes Yes (765 ILCS 77/) Residential Real Property Disclosure Act. Chapter 8, 2001 Growth Management No No No No Site Plan Review Yes No No No Chapter 15, 2002 Public Health and Safety Yes No No No Chapter 19, 1957 Environmental Protection Yes lNo lNo INo Chapter 16, 2002 Planning Documents General or Comprehensive Yes No No No Plan Is the plan equipped to provide linkage to this mitigation plan? Yes, plan include land use and redevelopment components. Floodplain or Basin Plan Yes No No No 9/20/2011 Regional Stormwater impacts are managed by Stormwater Plan Yes No Yes No MWRD. The Village lies within the Des Plaines River watershed planning area of MWRD's Icomprehensive Stormwater Master Planning Program 12/9/2006 Capital Improvement Plan Yes No No No 7/16/13 - 5 year CIP What types of capital facilities does the plan address? Water and sanitary sewers, flood control, streets, public buildings and equipment. How often is the plan revise/updated? Annually Habitat Conservation Plan No No No No The Economic Development Commission Economic Development Yes No Yes Yes is charged with reviewing Plan all economic development related programs and incentives including tax incentives offered through the Cook County 6b program. 6/5/07 Shoreline Management Plan No No No No Response/Recovery Planning Comprehensive Emergency No No Yes Yes Cook County DHSEM Management Plan hreat and Hazard fI( No No Yes No Cook County DHSEM entification and Risk Preparing THIRA Assessment Terrorism Plan No No Yes Yes Cook County DHSEM Post -Disaster Recovery Plan No No No No Continuity of Operations No No Yes No Cook County DHSEM Plan Public Health Plans iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillilillillillillillillI No iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillI No 'Yes iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliI No Cook County DPH iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillilillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillilliillillililI ABLE: FISCAL CAPABILITY Financial Resources Accessible or Eligible to Use? Community Development Block Grants Yes Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard -Prone Areas Yes State Sponsored Grant Programs Yes Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes Other Yes ABLE: ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY Staff/Personnel Resources Available?Department/Agency/Position lPlanners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes Community Development/ Director Public Works/ Village Engineer Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes Public Works/ Village Engineer Community Development/ Building Commissioner Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes Public Works/ Village Engineer Staff with training in benefit/cost analysis Yes Finance Department/Director Surveyors No Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes Cook County GIS Consortium Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area INo Emergency manager Yes IFire Department/ Fire Chief Grant writers Yes Community Development/ Director ABLE: NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE What department is responsible for floodplain management in your Public Works Classification Date Classified' Who is your jurisdiction's floodplain administrator? Public Works/Village Engineer I.urisdiction? (department/position) 2018 Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date of adoption of your flood damage prevention 5/21/02, updated 9/20/11 ordinance? Yes When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community 3/30/1999 Assistance Contact? Yes Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations No that need to be addressed? If so, please state what they are. Yes Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within Yes your jurisdiction? (If no, please state why) Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training No to support its floodplain management program? If so, what type of assistance/training is needed? Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? If so, is your jurisdiction seeking to improve its CRS Classification? Yes/ No lif not, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? ABLE: COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATIONS Participating? Classification Date Classified' Community Rating System Yes 6 2018 Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Yes 4/3 2013 Public Protection/ISO Yes 2 2009 StormReady Yes Gold (countywide) 2014 ree City USA Yes N/A 2013 Jurisdiction -Specific Natural I lazard Event The information provided below was solicited from the jurisdiction and supported by NOAA and other relevant data sources. The Natural Hazard Events Table lists all past occurrences of natural hazards within the jurisdiction. • Repetitive flood loss records are as follows: Number of FEMA -Identified Repetitive Loss Properties: 14 • Number of FEMA -Identified Severe Repetitive Loss Properties: 0 • Number of Repetitive Flood Loss/Severe Repetitive Loss Properties That Have Been Mitigated: 0 ABLE: NATURAL HAZARD EVENTS ype of Event FEMA Disaster Number (if applicable) Date Preliminary Damage Assessment Hail - 7/7/2017 - Severe Weather - 6/22/2016 - Lightning - /9/2015 $50,000 in property damage. Wind - 7/19/2013 - Flood DR -4116 /18/2013 $240,000 Flood - 7/23/2011 - Wind - 16/21/2011 7/11/2011 $380,000 Tornado - Winter Storm DR -1960 IDR 2/1/2011 19/13/2008 $200,000 Flood -1800 - Flood - IDR 5/22/2008 18/23/2007 - 1$112101000 Flood/Wind -1729 Wind - 8/1/2003 17/21/2003 - Wind - - Wind - 5/11/2003 - Wind - 6/12/2001 - Wind - 8/6/2000 15/18/2000 - Wind - - Wind - /10/2000 111/10/1998 - Wind - - Wind - 8/24/1998 15/28/1998 - Wind - - Wind - 9/29/1997 110/29/1996 - 1 Wind - - Winter Storm/Snow - 12/1994 11/1994 - Winter Storm/Ice - - Wind - 8/30/1993 - Wind - 7/2/1992 - Wind - 6/17/1992 - Flood - 8/1987 - Flood DR -776 10/1986 - J u ri sd iiii Hazards that represent a county -wide risk are addressed in the Risk Assessment section of the 2019 Cook County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. This section only addresses the hazards and their associated impacts that are relevant and unique to the municipality. Dam/Levee Failure: Levee 37: Potential for failure of levee wall and pump system. The northeast section of our community is most vulnerable if a failure would occur. Flood: We experience localized flooding throughout the Village, especially in the unincorporated subdivision, Forest River, near Kensington and River Roads under the jurisdiction of Cook County and Wheeling Township (but Mount Prospect Fire Dept. responds to emergencies). In particular, the Des Plains River flooding limits our ability to evacuate and receive resources from the East. Tornado and High Winds: Wind events are prevalent in the area and our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Snow: Our overhead ower lines are vulnerable. 15.8% ,. tie ul ti nits e rs it I it and this p ...... .......................................................................................................................p..............i..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... population has an increased vulnerability to extreme weather, particularly winter storms. Blizzards: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Ice Storms: Our overhead power lines are vulnerable. Hazard Risk Ranking The Hazard Risk Ranking Table below presents the ranking of the hazards of concern. Hazard area extent and location maps are included at the end of this chapter. These maps are based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this plan, and are considered to be adequate for planning purposes. ABLE: HAZARD RISK RANKING Rank Hazard Type Risk Rating Score (Probability x Impact) 1 Severe Weather 54 2 Severe Winter Weather 54 3 Earthquake 32 4 Tornado 27 5 Flood 16 6 Drought 2 7 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillilillillillilI Dam Failure ' 0 L Mitigation Strategies and Actions The heart of the mitigation plan is the mitigation strategy, which serves as the long-term blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in the risk assessment. The mitigation strategy describes how the community will accomplish the overall purpose, or mission, of the planning process. In this section, mitigation actions/projects were updated/amended, identified, evaluated, and prioritized. This section is organized as follows: • New Mitigation Actions - New actions identified during this 2019 update process • Ongoing Mitigation Actions - Ongoing actions with no definitive end or that are still in progress. During the 2019 update, these "ongoing" mitigation actions and projects were modified and/or amended, as needed. • Completed Mitigation Actions - An archive of all identified and completed projects, including completed actions since 2014. The Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix Table below lists the actions that make up the jurisdiction's hazard mitigation plan. The Mitigation Strategy Priority Schedule Table identifies the priority for each action. TABLE: HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Estimated Timeline/Projected Status Hazards Objectives Lead AgenciesCost Sources of Completion Date 1(a) Mitigated Met Funding Action M9.1 -Maintain good standing under the National Flood Insurance Program by implementing programs that meet or exceed the minimum NFIP requirements. Such programs include enforcing an adopted flood damage prevention ordinance, participating in floodplain mapping updates, and providing public assistance and information on floodplain requirements and impacts. Ongoing Flooding 41619 Public Works Low Local Short-term and Ongoing Action M9.2 -Continue to maintain or enhance the Village's CRS Classification. Ongoing All 31 4, 51 61 71 9, 1101111 Village Low Local Ongoing 113 Action M9.3 -Complete construction of Levee 37. Completed Flood 11 2, 8, 9, 12 US Army $2,500,000; Federal Completed Corps High Action M9.4 -Purchase emergency generator for Village water well. CompletedMulti-Hazard 1, 2 Village $575,000; Local Completed Medium Action M9.5 -Continue Creek Bank Stabilization Program. Ongoing Flood 112,9112 Village $25,000; 11 Local I Short-term -ow Ongoing Action M9.6 -Continue Creek Tree Trimming Program. 4 ............. Ongoing Flood, Severe 1, 21 91 12 Village $25,000; 11-ow Local I Short-term Weather, Ongoing Tornado Action M9.7-Continue yearly Creek Inspection Program. Ongoing Flood 112,9112 Village Low Local Short-term Ongoing Action M9.8-Continue yearly Detention Pond Maintenance Program. Ongoing Flood 112,9112 Village $100,000; 11-ow Local Short-term I Ongoing Action M9.9—Inspect Village warning sirens and review need for replacements. Ongoing Tornado 5 Village $90,000; Local Short-term Medium Action M9.10—Develop a Debris Management Plan. Ongoing Multi-Hazard 1 Village 11-ow Local Short-term Action M9.11-Continue providing Community Preparedness Guide on Village Web page and in Village Newsletter annually. Ongoing Multi-Hazard 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, Village Low Local Short-term 112 Action M9.12—ConductNew Town Subdivision Storm Drainage Analysis... Completed Flood 1112,31619 Village High Local lCompleted Action M9.13-Complete Catalpa Lane Area Drainage Improvements. Completed Flood 1, 2, 9, 12 Village $145,000 HMGP and Completed PDM Grants land Local ction M914—Complete Park Drive Area Drainage Improvements. Completed Flood 112,9112 Village $185,000 HMGP and Completed PDM Grants and Local ction M915-Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase, or relocation of structures in hazard-prone areas to prevent future structure damage. Give priority to properties with exposure to repetitive losses. FEMA Hazard Long-term Ongoing All 7113 Village High Mitigation (depending on Grants funding) ction M916—Continue to support the countywide actions identified in this plan. Ongoing All All Village Low Local Short- and Long- term Action M9.17-Actively participate in the plan maintenance strategy identified in this plan. Ongoing All 31416 DHSEM, Low Local Short-term Village ction M918—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, programs, or resources that dictate land use or redevelopment. Ongoing All 3, 4, 6, 10, 13 Village Low Local Short-term A Action M919-Increasepumping capacity of... Levee 37 pump stations. Ongoing TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD ction M920—Increase size storm sewers tributary to Levee 37 pumping stations and provide storm water detention. Ongoing TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD ction M921—Conduct a Floodplain Study of Higgins Creek. New Flood 314,13 Mount Prospect Public Works $75,000; Medium Capital 2020 Improvement Program/PDM Action M922 -Begin Stormwater Storage construction in Mount Prospect. New Flood 213; 91 11 I MWRD I $2,000,000;MWRD High and TBD Local 1(a) Ongoing indicates continuation of an action that is already in place. Short-term indicates implementation within five years. Long-term indicates implementation after five years. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilI ABLE: MITIGATION STRATEGY PRIORITY SCHEDULE Action Number Number of Objectives Met Benefits Costs Do Benefits Equal or Exceed Costs? Is Project Grant- Eligible? Can Project Be Funded Under Existing Programs/Budgets? Priority (a) 1 3 Medium Low Yes No Yes High 2 9 Medium Low Yes No Yes High 3 5 High High Yes No Yes High 2 Medium Low Yes No Yes High 5 4 High Low Yes 1Yes No lNo Yes High 6 4 High Low Yes High 7 4 High Low Yes lYes No lNo Yes High 8 4 High Low Yes High 9 110 1 Low Low Yes 1Yes No lNo Possibly lNo Medium 1 Low Low Medium 11 112 6 High Low Yes 1Yes No lNo Yes lNo High 5 Medium Medium Medium 13 114 4 High High Yes 1Yes Yes No lNo Medium 4 High High Yes Medium 15 116 2 113 High High 11 Yes 1Yes Yes lNo No Medium Medium -ow Yes High 17 118 3 Medium Low Yes 1Yes Yes lNo Yes High 5 Medium Low Yes High 119 TBD ITBD TBD TBD TBD ITBD TBD TBD TBD 11 20 ETBD TBD ETBD ETBD TBD 21 3 Medium Medium Yes Yes Unknown IUnknown High 22 4 High High Yes Yes High (a) See Chapter 1 for explanation of priorities. .......... New Mitigation Actions The following are new mitigation actions created during the 2019 update. .................................................................................... Action M-9.21 lm__i_Vlgabon Action Conduct a Floodplain Study of Higgins Creek. ear Initiated 2019 �ppllicablle Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Lead Mount Prospect Public Works Agency/Organization Supporting Agencies/Organizations Develop and implement sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally sound risk -reduction (mitigation) projects. Protect the lives, health, safety, and property of the citizens of Cook County from the impacts of natural hazards. Protect the public services and critical pplicable Goal facilities, including infrastructure, from loss of use during natural hazard events. Involve stakeholders to enhance the local capacity to mitigate, prepare for, and respond to the impacts of natural hazards. Develop, promote, and integrate mitigation action plans. Promote public understanding of and support for hazard mitigation. Consider the impacts of natural hazards on future land uses in the planning area, including possible impacts from climate change. Applicable Objective Integrate hazard mitigation policies into land use plans in the planning area. Encourage hazard mitigation measures that result in the least adverse effect on the natural environment and that use natural processes. Potential Funding Capital Improvement Program/PDM Source Estimated Cost F$75,000 Benefits (loss avoided) Provide better assessment of flood risk hazard, BFE and floodway/floodplain limits, and ability to regulate future development. Projected Completion 2020 Date Priority and Level of Importance (Low, High Priority Medium, High) Benefit Analysis (Low, Medium—Project will have along -term impact on the reduction of risk exposure Medium, High) for life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure for property. Cost Analysis (Low, Medium—The project could be implemented with existing funding but would Medium, High) require a re -apportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. Actual Completion Date ,ction/Implementation Higgins Creek is an unnumbered zone with no defined BFE or Ian and Project floodway/floodplain limits. A portion of Higgins Creek has recently annexed Description: Minto Mount Prospect. Action M-9.22 Mitigation Action Begin Stormwater Storage construction in Mount Prospect. ear Initiated F2019 �ppllicablle Jurisdiction Village of Mount Prospect Lead MWRD Agency/Organization Supporting Village of Mount Prospect Agencies/Organizations Develop and implement sustainable, cost-effective, and environmentally sound risk -reduction (mitigation) projects. Applicable Goal Protect the lives, health, safety, and property of the citizens of Cook County from the impacts of natural hazards. Protect public services and critical facilities, including infrastructure, from loss of use during natural hazard events and potential damage from such activities. Increase the resilience of (or protect and maintain) infrastructure and critical facilities. Consider the impacts of natural hazards on future land uses in the planning Applicable Objective area, including possible impacts from climate change. Provide or improve flood protection on a watershed basis with flood control structures and drainage maintenance plans. Encourage hazard mitigation measures that result in the least adverse effect on the natural environment and that use natural processes. Potential Funding MWRD and Local Source Estimated Cost F$2,000,000; MWRD Contribution: TBD Benefits (loss avoided) N/A Projected Completion TBD Date Priority and Level of Importance (Low, High Medium, High) Benefit Analysis (Low, High Medium, High) Cost Analysis (Low, High Medium, High) Actual Completion Date ID: Mount Prospect Contract: 18-IGA-25 ,ction/Implementation Watershed: Lower Des Plaines Location: Mount Prospect, IL Ian and Project Design and construction of two new flood storage basins and upgrade of Description: ancillary storm sewers to provide a cumulative flood storage volume of approximately 30 acre-feet. 2-1 Ongoing Mitigation Actions The following are ongoing actions with no definitive end or that are still in progress. During the 2019 update, these "ongoing" mitigation actions and projects were modified and/or amended, as needed. .......................................................... ............ Action M-9.1 rABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX A Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (XI 01 C, R, N) / N M-9.2 1#� Maintain good standing under the National Flood Insurance Program by # M-9.1 implementing programs that meet or exceed the minimum NFIP 0 Description: requirements. Such programs include enforcing an adopted flood damage prevention ordinance, participating in floodplain mapping rYes ompletion status legend: updates, and providing public assistance and information on floodplain 1C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken requirements and impacts. Status The Village continues to implement programs. 0 Description: Yes Completion status legend: N = New 0 = Action Ongoing toward Completion 1C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.2 rABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (XI 01 C, R, N) Y/NA M-9.2 1#� Continue to maintain or enhance the Village"s CRS Classification. Status The Village submitted documentation at the 5 year cycle recertification 0 Description: visit. Improved to Class 6 Rating. rYes ompletion status legend: N = New 0 = Action Ongoing toward Completion 1C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken ............. Action M-9.5 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) / N M-9.5 1#� Continue Creek Bank Stabilization Program. tatus The Village continues a yearly creek bank stabilization program O escription: es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.6 FABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) / N M-9.6 1#� Continue Creek Tree Trimming Program. tatus The Village continues a yearly tree trimming program. O escription: es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken 2,4 Action M-9.7 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) / N M-9.7 1#� Continue yearly' Creek Inspection Program. tatus The Village continues a yearly creek inspection program. O escription: es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.8 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) Y/ N it M-9.8 Continue yearly Detention Pond Maintenance Program. Status The Village continues a yearly detention pond maintenance program. O Description: es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.9 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) / N M-9.9 1#� Inspect Village warning sirens and review need for replacements. tatus Inspection, testing, and maintenance indicate need for replacement. O escription: branches following storm events and is working with ARC to include es debris cleanup following an emergency event. ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.10 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) Y/ N it M-9.10 Develop a Debris Management Plan. Status The Village created a storm debris management for trees and tree O Description: branches following storm events and is working with ARC to include es debris cleanup following an emergency event. ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.11 rABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX A Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (XI 01 C, R, N) Y/N # M-9.11 I Continue providing Community Preparedness Guide on Village Web page and in Village Newsletter annually. IStatus The Village continues to make available the Community Preparedness 0 Description: Guide on the Village web page and in the Village newsletter. 0 Yes structures in hazard -prone areas. A building permit was issued for Completion status legend: N = New 0 = Action Ongoing toward Completion 1C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.15 FABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX A Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (XI 01 C, R, N) Y/N 1 # M-9.15 Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase, or relocation of structures in hazard -prone areas to prevent future structure damage. Give priority to properties with exposure to repetitive losses. Status The Village continues to support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of 0 Description: structures in hazard -prone areas. A building permit was issued for Yes iretrofitting of a residential home to reduce the chance of flooding. Completion status legend: N = New 0 = Action Ongoing toward Completion 1C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken .................................................................................... Action M-9.16 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) / N M-9.16 1#� Continue to support the countywide actions identified in this plan. tatus The Village continues to support the countywide actions. O escription: The Village continues to participate in the plan maintenance strategy O es through this annual progress report. ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.17 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) IY/N # M-9.17 Actively participate in the plan maintenance strategy identified in this plan. Status The Village continues to participate in the plan maintenance strategy O Description: through this annual progress report. Yes Completion status legend: N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken 2,8 Action M-9.18 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) Y/ N # M-9.18 Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, programs, or tatus resources that dictate land use or redevelopment. O Status The Village continues to look for ways to integrate the mitigation plan O Description: into other plans, programs or resources. Yes N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Completion status legend: N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.19 FABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) / N M-9.19 1#� Increase ;pumping capacity of Levee 37 pump stations. tatus The Village is working with the Army Corps and IDNR to secure funding O escription: for the project and to initiate the design and construction es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.20 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Number Action Item Description Status Action Taken (X, O, C, R, N) Y/ N # M-9.20 Increase size of storm sewers tributary to Levee 37 pumping stations and provide storm water detention. Status Submitted funding request to MWRD and have met with River Trails Description: Park District to coordinate location of detention ponds. Working on O Yes Intergovernmental Agreements with the MWRD and the Park District. Completion status legend: N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken u:: Completed Mitigation Actions The following section represents completed mitigation actions, and serves as an archive of identified and completed projects Action M-9.3 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Action Item Description Status Number (X, O, C, R, N) Action Taken Y/N # M-9.3 Complete construction of Levee 37. Status All work is now complete. C Description: es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.4 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Action Item Description Status Number (X, O, C, R, N) Action Taken Y/N # M-9.4 Purchase emergency generator for Village water well. Status Generator purchased and installed and operative. C Description: es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken u Action M-9.12 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Action Item Description Status Number (X, O, C, R, N) Action Taken Y/N # M-9.12 Conduct New Town Subdivision Storm Drainage Analysis. Status Storm drainage analysis is complete. Continue to work with the Army C Description: Corps for opportunities to fund project. esompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.13 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Action Item Description Status Number (X, O, C, R, N) Action Taken Y/N # M-9.13 Complete Catalpa "Lane Area Drainage Improvements. Status The Catalpa Lane Area Drainage Improvements were completed this C Description: year. es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken Action M-9.14 ABLE: ACTION PLAN MATRIX Action Action Item Description Status Number (X, 0, C, R, N) Action Taken Y/N # M-9.14 Complete Park Drive Area Drainage Improvements. Status The Park Drive Area Drainage Improvements were completed in C Description: 2017. es ompletion status legend: r N = New O = Action Ongoing toward Completion C = Project Completed R = Want Removed from Annex X = No Action Taken u Future Needs to Better Understand Risk/Vulnerability None at this time. Additional Comments None at this time. MOUNT PROSPECT EXISTING CONDITIONS 2010 Population 541167 ota I Assessed Value of Structures and Contents $7,812,321,439 1242.69 Area in 100 -Year Floodplain acres Area in 500 -Year Floodplain 393.29 acres 180 Number of Critical Facilities iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillilillillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliililllllllllllllI Contents HAZARD EXPOSURE IN MOUNT PROSPECT Number Exposed Value Exposed to Hazard % of Tota I Assessed Value Exposed Contents Population Buildings Structure Contents Total Darn Failure Buffalo Creek 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% U . Salt Cr. #2 0 0 $0 $0 $0 0.00 ouhy 699 215 $172,406,000 $130,710,000 $303,116,000 3.88% U. Salt Cr. #3 0 0 $0 1$0 $0 $0 0.00 U. Salt Cr. #4 0 0 $0 1$0 0.00 Flood 100 -Year 484 149 $47,297,493 $32,813,111 $80,110,605 1.03 500 -Year 11154 355 $99.,489,207 $59,,424,221 $158,913,427 2.03 Tornado 100 -Year — — $1,446,716,881$863,437,744$2,310,154,626 29.57% Year iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillillillillillillilliillillillill — — $1,567,403,550 $866,957,697 $2,434,361,247 31.16% ESTIMATED PROPERTY DAMAGE VALUES IN MOUNT PROSPECT Estimated Damage Associated with Hazard % of Total Assessed Value Damaged Building Contents Total Dam Failure Buffalo Creek $0 1$0 $0 1$0 $0 1$0 0.00% 10.00% U. Salt Cr. #2 ouhy $188,000 1$0 $490,000 1$0 $678,000 1$0 0.01% 10.00% U. Salt Cr. #3 U. Salt Cr. #4 Iso Iso j$0 10.00% Earthquake 1909 Historical Event $22,463,893 $4,608,321 $27,072,214 0.35 Flood u 10 -Year $239,544 $96,486 $336,030 0.00% 100 -Year $5,997,583 1$131851,461 $2,881,310 1$6,256,795 $8,878,894 0.11% 10.26% 500 -Year $20,108,256 Tornado 100 -Year $144,671.,688 $86,343,774 $231,015,463 2.96 500 -Year $228,840,918 $126,575,824 $355,416,742 4.55% Hazard Mapping 40 4-1