Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW Agenda Packet 06/13/2006 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Meeting Location: Mount Prospect Village Hall 50 South Emerson Street Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Mayor Irvana K. Wilks Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee John Korn Trustee Michael Zadel II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF APRIL 25, 2006 ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF MAY 9, 2006 III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IV. MAPLE STREET PARKING LOT - PARKING ACCOMMODATION REQUEST Ramesh Ganhdi, President of the Mount Prospect Town Home Association, has requested the Village consider establishing a pro-rated system for Maple Street Lot parking tags so the residents and related parties of his town home association could purchase parking privileges for only the months necessary. Residents may only park in the Maple Street Lot between April and November. Mr. Ganhdi has requested the option to purchase parking tags for less than the normal period of consecutive months. For example, if a student were home from school for the summer, they could purchase a parking tag for only the months they would be home compared to the cost of the tag for the entire period when they only need a few months. Any change to the existing agreement will require Board action. V. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATIONS/FEE IN LIEU OF STORMWATER DETENTION Based on increasing feedback from developers of smaller residential building projects (teardowns and small resubdivisions), staff would like to explore with the Village Board the concept of providing relief from certain storm water detention requirements by allowing for payment of a "fee in lieu of' providing the required storage on site. The "fee" would then be used to address storm water detention issues on a larger scale basis. Given the steadily increasing number of teardowns and small residential resubdivision projects, it is likely the fee will generate significant revenue that will allow the Village to undertake larger scale projects. The attached memorandum and back-up material will provide the basis for initial review. Appropriate staff will be on hand to answer questions and facilitate discussion. NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO A TTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODA TION TO PARTICIPA TE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFF/CE A T 50 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT,ILLlNOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064. VI. REFUSE COLLECTION PROGRAM/ADDITIONAL WHEELED CART POLICY OPTIONS In May of this year, the Village transitioned from a modified volume-based refuse collection program to an unlimited volume wheeled toter program. The new solid waste program is designed around the concept of a fully automated system and success hinges on residents using the wheeled toters. In a few circumstances, the maximum issue of a 95-gallon refuse and a 65-gallon recycling cart may not offer enough capacity on a weekly basis. Residents have inquired about the availability of a second wheeled cart for refuse since the first informational flyers were mailed. The Village's standard response to these inquires has been, "all refuse and recycling must be contained in the cart and any refuse or recycling outside of the cart will not be collected. If the cart is not meeting your needs, please call us in June to discuss options available to you." The Public Works Department has developed several options to address the issue of the availability and use of multiple carts for refuse and recycling service. Appropriate staff will be on hand to answer questions and facilitate discussion. VII. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT VIII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT CLOSED SESSION PROPERTY ACQUISITION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (5). "The purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body." MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE APRIL 25, 2006 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m., in the Village Board Room of Village Hall, 50 South Emerson Street, by Mayor Irvana Wilks. Present at the meeting were: Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, John Korn, Michaele Skowron and Michael Zade!. Absent from the meeting was Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer. Staff members present included: Village Manager Michael Janonis, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, Police Chief Richard Eddington, Fire Chief Michael Figolah, Deputy Fire Chief John Malcolm and Public Works Director Glen Andler. II. MINUTES Approval of Minutes of January 10, 2006. Motion made by Trustee Korn and Seconded by Trustee Zade!. Minutes were approved. Trustee Corcoran abstained. III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. IV. VILLAGE-WIDE FACILITIES STUDY Village Manager Janonis stated that the Village Board has placed funds in fiscal year 2006 budget for a study of space needs. The study should be inclusive for a comprehensive review for possible phasing regarding public safety needs. He stated that he anticipated obtaining input for decision making as the process continues. This is just an initial first step to evaluate existing facilities and make recommendations as to which facilities could be altered for reuse and what facilities may need to be added to. Fire Chief Figolah stated that the purpose of this study was not to look at making a decision whether to move Station 14 or to move Fire Administration to another location. The purpose of the study was to obtain cost recommendations of overall operational review that may be impacted by existing space and space demands including storage spaces which have been identified as lacking. While there are several options available including expanding Police operations into the Fire Administration area in the Public Safety Building, there are still other issues with the Public Safety Building including parking that would have to be addressed before such an undertaking moves forward. He stated Station 14 is very outdated and has been in the original building since the Village assumed operation of the Station in 1971 and at that time was only to be a temporary Station. He also stated that if a new Station 14 were to be built, staff anticipates transferring the vehicle maintenance function to Public Works and such a transfer would require some expansion of the Public Works vehicle operations facility. 1 He also stated there is a need for an Emergency Operations Center facility separate of the existing facility as a back-up or primary location that has an alternate power source. He said a logical location would be part of the Public Works facility since they would be critical in any emergency operation anyway. There was also a need to maintain the storage requirements for Public Works at some location convenient. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: Some comments were made regarding the need to address the current level of preparedness and alternative location needs based on potential response scenarios. It was suggested that over the past 13 years since the Public Safety Building has been built, it would be worthwhile providing information regarding what has changed in terms of operational needs since the building was built. There was a comment regarding the use of technology to allow interaction of Police and Fire Administration without physical location limitations. A question was asked whether annexations would have an impact on service demands and whether such annexation options should be included in any study document. Chief Figolah stated that he would anticipate establishment of a staff committee to evaluate consultant responses and provide general interviews and review of contracts in anticipation of coming before the Board on July 18 for contract approval. Village Manager Janonis stated that staff would advise the Board about the short list of firms that responded. Edwin Malszewski, 1810 Hopi Lane, spoke. He stated he is concerned about the possible relocation of Station 14 from its existing location on the east side of the tracks. Chief Figolah stated he has mailing addresses of people that have previously expressed some interest in consideration of any discussion of Station 14 and they have been contacted for this meeting and would continue to be informed as the discussion continues regarding the future of Station 14. Mal Halec, 927 Quince Lane, spoke. He stated he appreciated receiving notice of this meeting and felt that the citizens and staff could work together to come up with a reasonable solution. Mike Brown, 2005 Hopi Lane, spoke. He inquired why it was necessary to utilize a consultant and why staff could not undertake the study itself. v. BRIEFING ON AT&T PROJECT L1GHTSPEED Village Manager Janonis stated that this was for informational purposes only based on AT&T approaching other communities and the recent press coverage regarding the communities' response to permit applications for this upgrade. Assistant Village Manager Strahl provided a general overview of the Project Lightspeed infrastructure system and the potential impact of such a project on existing Franchise Ordinances. Village Manager Janonis stated it is likely there may be some banding together for legal defense through the Councils of Government. 2 VI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Village Manager Janonis stated that the Sister Cities Potluck Dinner is April 28 at 6:30 p.m. The Downtown Fitness Walk is April 29 along with the Village-wide garage sale. May 1 is the final clean up week under the old refuse contract. May 1 starts the distribution of the wheeled carts to the residences. The distribution will take four to six weeks and once the carts are distributed to residents, they may start using them as they are available. He also stated that April 29 was the final Saturday the Village Hall would be open for vehicle sticker sales. VII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Mayor Wilks provided information regarding the upcoming Arbor Day celebration on April 28. She also mentioned a concert on April 30 of musical instruments which had been reused. Motion made by Trustee Zadel and Seconded by Trustee Skowron to move into Closed Session at 8:14 p.m. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Closed Session adjourned and there being no further business, the Committee of the Whole meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. ~~ s.-ttJ DAVID STRAHL Assistant Village Manager 3 MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MAY 9, 2006 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m., in the Village Board Room of Village Hall, 50 South Emerson Street, by Mayor Irvana Wilks. Present at the meeting were: Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, John Korn and Michaele Skowron. Absent from the meeting were Trustees Richard Lohrstorfer and Michael Zadel. Staff members present included: Village Manager Michael Janonis and Assistant Village Manager David Strahl. II. MINUTES Deferral of Minutes of April 25, 2006. Motion made by Trustee Skowron and Seconded by Trustee Korn. Deferral of Minutes was approved. Next Committee of the Whole meeting would be June 13, 2006. III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. IV. SMOKING REGULATIONS DISCUSSION Village Manager Janonis provided an overview of the Smoking Regulations that have recently been approved by the General Assembly. He also highlighted the smoking regulations that have recently been passed by Cook County. He stated communities were previously preempted by Statute to enact any smoking regulations but that preemption has been altered by this recent Legislation. The Statutes now allow communities to take local action regarding smoking regulations within their community. He also stated the Cook County Ordinance which was recently enacted is to become effective in March 2007 and unless alternative regulation is passed by the local municipality, the Cook County regulations would apply to the Village of Mount Prospect. In order to solicit input from possibly impacted residents, an email address has been set up for residents and any interested parties to contribute their thoughts directly to the Village for compilation and sharing with the Village Board as they consider this topic. David Rowe, 414 North Pine, spoke. He suggested the Village Board look at the Ordinance that was approved by Calabasas, California. He stated this Ordinance is significantly more restrictive and also regulates smoking around the front entrance to buildings. He stated he is concerned if the Cook County Ordinance is allowed to become effective, the revenue for violation would not stay locally controlled. He also recommended the Village Board consider banning smoking on sidewalks, playgrounds or other public areas and within a 20' clear zone to the entrance of any building. 1 Ted Pappas, 1904 South Elmhurst Road, the owner of Papp's Bar and Grill, spoke. He stated he is concerned that a Smoking Regulations Ordinance would impact his customers. He stated approximately 80% of his customers smoke and they feel that smoking in his restaurant is one of the last havens available to them. He stated that most smokers feel it is their right to smoke in bars if they are so inclined. He feels that any regulations would hurt his business and the ban, if approved, would create a situation where the Village would be at an unfair disadvantage to neighboring communities which may have no regulation on smoking. Jim Early, Corporate Manager, for Lettuce Entertainment Company, spoke. He stated he has been involved with the Restaurant Association in drafting the Cook County Ordinance and had anticipated that a model Ordinance would be drafted by the Northwest Municipal Conference for consideration on a region-wide basis. He stated that he understands that Elk Grove residents are coming to businesses in Mount Prospect just to smoke because of the regulations in Elk Grove. He feels it would make the most sense if, in fact, a level playing field was created that applied across all communities in the area. Vic Giovanni, 303 East Kensington, owner of the Loft Restaurant, spoke. He stated that he undertook an unscientific survey of the patrons in the bar area to see why they are in the bar area and they all stated they were present in the bar area in order to smoke. He stated with the reconfiguration of the restaurant, they did separate the restaurant from the bar area and felt that such a separation would be viable for most restaurants in the community and should be considered as part of the relief available to comply with the Ordinance. Tim Borden, of Ala Carte Entertainment, spoke. He suggested that the Board also consider including a recommended clean-air device as part of the Ordinance to reduce the exposure to second-hand smoke which would be very similar to the City of Chicago Ordinance. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: It was suggested that there be some additional discussion with all interested parties in additional to setting up regulations to limit the exposure of second-hand smoke to any patrons. There was also a question regarding the ability to gather input from impacted businesses. There was also a general desire to create a level playing field across all communities. Village Manager Janonis stated that staff would provide notice of future meetings on this topic to interested parties. V. VILLAGE HALL FRONT ENTRANCE ENHANCEMENT DISCUSSION Assistant Village Manager Strahl provide a general overview of the options that have been presented and prepared by DLK. He stated that the options based on the intensity of constructability, therefore, impacting the overall cost of the enhancement. He stated that the schemes that are presented are the result of previous discussions with Board representatives and staff in an effort to draw further attention to the front entrance off Emerson Street and a general desire to expand the public area of the lobby. 2 General comments from Village Board members included the following items: There was general agreement that Schemes 0 and E be removed from further consideration and focus be directed toward the other options. There was a general preference for double doors facing east and south and a desire to remove the existing doors going into the stairwell from the outside; therefore, to enhance a central lobby area underneath the portico. It was also recommended that if any enhancements were undertaken with the front entrance that the suggested enhancements to the main stairwell also be undertaken at that time. There was a concern regarding undertaking the enhancements to the point where they would appear as if they were only halfway completed and it must be done with an appearance that there is a permanent end product about the design. There was also general acceptance that if enhancements were to be undertaken, that the flags should be attached to the building with a Village seal on the glass as rendered. General support existed for further consideration of schemes A through C. Mayor Wilks stated she feels that no additional enhancements are necessary and feels that the design and functionality is well represented of the community. She stated she would support the main stairwell enhancements and would suggest the Village Board wait for further input from the two absent Trustees before a final decision is made. Village Manager Janonis suggested this item could be brought back for the June 13 Committee of the Whole meeting and further follow up from staff regarding possible discussion dates and cost options. VI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Village Manager Janonis stated that next Coffee with Council date is scheduled for May 13 from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :00 a.m., at the Community Center of Village Hall. VII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Village Manager Janonis provided an overview of the numerous downtown activities that are now starting up with the improvement in the weather. which had been reused. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9: 15 p.m. ~"~ ~~~ DAVID STRAHL Assistant Village Manager 3 Mount Prospt.'Ct INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 8,2006 SUBJECT: MAPLE STREET TOWNHOMES PARKING REQUEST Ramesh Ganhdi, president of the Mount Prospect Town Home Association, has requested the Village consider establishing a pro-rated system for Maple Street Lot parking tags so the residents and related parties of his townhome association could purchase parking privileges for only the months necessary. Residents may only park in the Maple Street Lot between April to November. Mr. Ganhdi has requested the option to purchase parking tags for less than the normal period of consecutive months. For example, if a student were home from school for the summer they could purchase a parking tag for only the months they would be home compared to the cost of the tag for the entire period when they only need a few months. The current cost is $120 per annual period. Mr. Gandhi is requesting the Village Board consider a rate of $15 per month. The agreement between the Village and Association does not contemplate a pro-rated system and in order to accommodate this request the agreement would have to be renegotiated. If the agreement were to be opened to allow for this pro-rated option staff would suggest that the fee for the parking privilege be adjusted to more accurately reflect the recent increase in cost now charged in the commuter lot. There is no formula stipulating how the rate was determined, but it does compute to about 50% of the commuter cost. Therefore, the annual cost per period to more closely match the commuter rate would be approximately $180. The Village commuter lot cost is still under the market price of $2 per day charged at Busse Car Wash. Staff would request the Village Board consider Mr. Ganhdi's request in order to respond to him with the Village's position on this matter. ~~si:d David Strahl H:\VILM\DOWNTOWN\Downtown parking\Maple Street Townhomes Parking Agreement Memo 3.doc INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: DECEMBER 15, 2005 SUBJECT: MAPLE STREET TOWNHOMES PARKING - FOLLOW-UP This memorandum is a follow-up to the previous correspondence of September 14 . (attached).. Resident Ramesh Ganhdi, president of the association, has requested the Village c.onsider offering parking tags/passes to association residents on a pro-rated basis whereby depending on when the resident purchased the tag theywould pay a tower rate for the period of time requested for parking. For example, if a resident or immediate family member wanted to have parking privileges through the summer and purchased a parking tag in June for the remaining portion oftheparking year (until November 30) the rate would be based on $15 per month or $90 from June through November. Currently the agreement does nothave provisions allowing for pro-rated parking rates so regardless when someone purchases a tag they must pay the entire $120 annual rate. Mr. Ganhdi has polled the residents and stated that approximately 5-6 resident$ would be interested in the pro-rated option. According to Finance Department records, there are only 2 residents who purchased tags for 2005, which is thesarhe number as 2004. At this time residents who wish to purchase parking t~gs must provide confirmation .of .residen~yin the association; however, if the program were conve.rted to a pro-rated system it is possible that there wOuld need to be some additibnalcriteria to ensure tags were made available based on legitimate requests~ Based on the requirement of purchasing.~ tag}or the cost of the entire year currently provides some self-regulation. .. There should also be some type of discussion regarding the current annual rate for the tags. At this time the $15 per month breaks down to approximptely.$.50 per day. . The commuter parking rates increased in 2005 to $1.50 from $1 per day, so it woqld be conceivab.le that the rate could be increased to maintain the 50%discount level. However, there is nothing in the agreement that requires the rate to be calculated on 50% of the daily rate. Furthermore, there is parking available at Busse Car Wash for $2 per day and users may purchase monthly parking privileges and space still exists for additional vehicles. MAPLE STREET TOWNHOMES PARKING - FOLLOW-UP DECEMBER 15. 2005 .. Page 2 Recommendation: The option of offering pro-rated parking tags is a policy decision by the Village Board. Staff is neutral since the current usage level is quite low. However, it would be worthwhile to consider some criteria defining eligible purchasers if a pro-rated system is undertaken. Furthermore, if the pro-ration option is to be discussed such a discussion could also be an opportunity to consider raising the annual rate to more closely reflect the recent daily parking rate increase. If you have any questions, please contact me. ~~!:& CO" David Strahl H:\VILM\DOWNTOWN\Downtown parking\Maple Street Townhomes Parking AgreemenfMemo 2.doc Mount Prospect INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois ~ 12.\ o~ e: ;A~ r-:lt# b. . P F"l-:!-- SUBJECT: MAPLE STREET TOWNHOMES PARKING. . fOl.... ... , ~(:1 W.u.- ._.,,'\~ ~fj . .d 'c:>\~~'" "*-'/ .. ~ Resident Ramesh Ganhdi (342 S. Maple - 847-398-1176), president of Mount Prospe Townhomes Association, appeared at Coffee with Council on September 10 to inquir abou~ the option of purchasing parking privilege passes to the Maple Street lot on ales than annual basis. . -, TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E.JANONIS FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 Issue: Backllround: '.. . . .1 A resolution has been in place since May 1992 allowing Maple Street Townhome residents J-, accessto up to 28 parking spaces in the southwest corner of the Maple Street commuter \.~ v lot. The vehicles may only be parked in the lot between the hours of7 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. &,\01.-/'" from April 1 through November 30.The residents must purchase a parking pass by March 31 annually. The parking pass is valued at $120. The fee amounts to approximately $.50 per day for parkingduring the 8 m9nths. The Village Board increased the commuter parking fees this year from$1to$1.50, which repre~ented the first rate increase in over 15 years~ Based on the previous commuter fee the Maple Street residents were paying approximately one-half of the regular commuter rates~ There were no cost escalators in the resolution nor were there any criteria to base the annual cost. If a decision to increase the cosito remain consistent with the previous 50% level of the commuter rate the annual cost would need to increase to $180 which represents $.75 per day. Also, if any change were to be considered in the re~olotion the change would have to be initiated by October 30., 2005. The agreement automatically renews annually unless a change requestis initiated at least 30 days prior to November 30. The Village.staff could administratively accommodate the purchase of a parking pass ona monthly basis through the use ofa hang tag with the expiration date clearly marked, similar . to the handicap hang tags with the written expiration date. However, with the additional hang tags and administrative effort it is recommended that the monthly fee be established MAPLE STREETTOWNHOMES PARKING SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 Page 2 that is higher than the typical monthly breakdown of the annual fee. For example, if the annual fee were increased to $180 it b~eaks down to $22.50 monthly. However, in order to provide an incentive to purchase an annual hang tag the monthly fee could be increased to $25 per month. Busse Car Wash currently rehts spaces for overnight and daytime parking without a winter parking prohibition for $2 per day or $35 per month. The Village rates are substantially less than the Busse rates and there is adequate parking in the Busse lot for vehicles that need less than the full 8 month parking privileges in the Maple Street lot. Finally, the number of Maple Street residents purchasing parking passes has been very low, in 2002 the number was 2: 2003: 6; 2004: 2; 2005: 2. Recommendation: Some consideration should be made..to .increase the annual cost to k.eep track with the. current commuter parking rates. Also, since there is such low usage and the availability of parking at the Busse Car Wash lot it does not appear to be a prudent use of staff time and resources to create an additional option for month to month parking privileges. Please advise if you have any questions or comments. ~ ~~{f David Strahl H:\VILM\DOWNTOWN\Downtown parking\Maple Street Townhomes Parking Agreement Memo:doc Mount ProspeCt Town Home Association President: Ramesh Gandhi 398-1176; Treasurer: oBil Desmore 590-0648; SecretaJy: Mary Kay 255-3953; Landscape Coordinator: Michele Logar 398-7809; Officer: Diane Mockenhaupt 368-0667 Date: September 2005 To: Mayor ofMt.Prospect Village Manager ofMt. Prospect From: Ramesh Ganhdi,President ofMt.Prospect Town Home Associa~ion Re: Maple & Lincoln Street Commuter Lot - Some of our residents purchase parking tags from the city_ so that we can park in your commuter lot from April 1 - November 31st. The cost of the parking tag was $115. Last year one of our town homeowner's children came home from college in July and wanted to purchase a parking tag from July-November. They asked for a pro- rated amount since we did not park in the lot for the first 3 months. They were told by the city hall that they had to pay the full price. No discounts were offered. We only have 28 families that live on the corner of Maple & Lincoln Streets. The majority of the owners are single parents-and senior-citizens. Our town home was built during atime when most families only had one car. Now with parents and teenage children working many of us have 2 or more cars. We have to rent parking spaces from either the City oiMt. Prospect or Busse Car Wash. We are asking-that in the future ifsomeone needs to_buy-,a parkingtagJater in the year, they should pay at arate of$15 permonth until the end of the parking Season in November. Thank your for your time and consideration. ('-. i~ eM/ 4/29/92 . RESOLtJ'l'ION NO. 14-92 A RESOWTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BE'l'WEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE MOUNT PROSPECT 'l'OWHHOME ASSOCIATIONGEHERALLY U>CATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF L:INCOUf AND ~PLE STREETS WHEREAS,. t:heMount prospect Townho.e Association, generally located at the northwest C01"rler of Linc;olnandMaple streets,. in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois experience a shortage in parking spaces. for the residents of the Association, and WBEREA8., the Village .of Mount Prospect owns and operates a parking lot at the northeast corner of "ple and Lincoln streets, commonly known as 1:1H& Maple Street Parking Lot, and . . WHEREAS, representa~ive8 of the Mount Prospect Townhome Assceiation have s~mitted a request to the Villaqeof Mount Prospect for permission to utilize the Haple Street Parkinq Lot for overnight parking; and . . WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Villaqeof Mount Prospect have drafted an Agreement . between the village. and the Hount' Prospect TownhoJile Association granting permission' for specitied vehicles to 'utilize the Maple street Parking Lot... . HOW, THEREFoRE, BE. IT' RESOLVED BY. THE. MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE 'OF. MOtJHT PROSPECT, COOK COtmTY, ILLINOIS':' . SECTIONOHB: 'l'hattheMayorandBoard of Trustees of the Vilhge of Mount Prospect have aqreedto permit specified :a::esidents of the Mount Prospect TOwnhQJl8Association to park their vehicles in the Haple Street Parking Lot, the terms and conditions are set . forth in the Aqreement attached hereto and hereby ude a part hereof as Exhibit. "An. SECTION TWO: 'l'hatth1s Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after it.. passaqe . and 'approval in the mann~ provided by law. . NAYS: Corcoran. Clowes. Floros. Hoefert. Wilks None AYES: ABSENT:. None Pass:. Busse. PASSED and APPROVED .this 5th day of May , 1992. .".. ATTEST: . ~~y.V~ Carol A. FieldS village Clerk .. 0. '!J19<4 ~.. ., ~~' AGREEMENT BEtWEEN 'l1IE' '7 , TOWNHOME HmlBsWNBRs" ASSOCIATION AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS m~~ ... - , WHEREAS, the . !Ia,l~ &trCit-lfowDhome BeBleewa.;(Association(bereinafter "Association") desire to use the Village of Mount Prospectcommuterparldng lot located at 301 South Maple Street. Mount Pro$pcct. IDinois as an overnight parking area fol' its residents; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is willing to permit them to do so according to the terms of this Agreement; IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Association shall be pennitted to use a m3vimum of twen!)'-eight (28) .of the commuter spaces as designated by the Village of Mount Prospect. This munber represents one parking space per unit for the Maple Street townhomes.Usersof the parking Sp;i.ces sball park in the spaces at the southwest comer of the parking lot. 2.Parldng in the commuter 10t5l?-alL be permitted only from April Istthrougb November 30th, during the term of this Agreement. . . . . 3~ Automobiles may not be parked in the coD1Ii1uter lot prior to 7;OOp.m. and must , be removed by 7:30 a.DLeacb morning. Failure to adhere to these hours will result in the " issuance ., of a citation and towing, of the vehide by the Village's authorized towing contractor. 4. Members of the Association shall pay to the'Village of .Mount. Prospect .$120.00' ," for the fe.e to park at the Maple Street lot from Apri11st thrOUgh N:ovember. 30th of each year.. Payments, shall be made, no later than Marcb31 of ~cbyear at the Finance Department at Village HalL. 'Association members will be issued a Mount Prospect parking sticlcer. SuCh sticlcer sballbe displayed with the Association sticker described in Paragraph 5. ,.....,.::"... ----------------- ~ r". S. The Homeowners shall be responsible for the issuance of a sticker or placard indicating that .a.vehicle is permitted to park in the designated parking area. Failure to display the sticker will result in the issuance of a citation and towing of the vehicle by the . Village's authorized towing contractor. 6. It is understood that it is the obligation. of the. Association to advise its members of the requirements of this Agreement. Any continued violation of this Agreement by any member of the Association shall be sufficient reason to revoke this Agreement with the Association. 7. This Agreement shalt be in effect through Nov~IJ)ber 30, 1992 ~d shall be extended for a period of twelve (12) months thereafter for each succeeding year provided neither party gives written notice of its intent to te~te the Agreement at least thirty (30) days prior to November 30th of each year. 8. The minuteS from the Association meeting authorizing execution of this . Agreement shall be attached hereto. DATED tbis J I.sW day of ~. , 1992. vn.LAGS OF MOUNT PROSPScr BY' ~ =~WNHO ~1f7tD";. BY.~/'~'~~ Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK L1NDELOF DATE: JUNE 9,2006 SUBJECT: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATIONS FEE IN LIEU OF STORMWATER DETENTION Current Code Requirements Most of the Village of Mount Prospect was developed prior to 1970, so most of the infrastructure, including the Village storm sewer system was installed more than 30 years ago. Consequently, most of the Village storm sewers were installed before the current storm sewer design standards were developed, and before stormwater detention regulations were enacted. Furthermore, much of the drainage of the central portions of the Village is carried by sewers combining stormwater and sanitary sewage. The current Village Codes were designed to both provide adequate drainage for any site to be developed, and to protect the neighboring properties by controlling the stormwater runoff entering the Village storm and combined sewer systems. This is accomplished primarily by requiring stormwater detention to be provided on site, as required by Sections 15.401 and 15.501 of the Village Code. (See attached.) The types of projects requiring stormwater detention are summarized below: - All commercial, industrial, institutional, and multi-family developments - Additions greater than 25% of the existing building footprint or parking lot expansions greater than 50% of the existing lot to any commercial, industrial, institutional, and multi-family development - Single family developments involving two (2) or more new units Current Code Implementation For projects requiring stormwater detention, the stormwater runoff is intercepted at various points around the site, and directed to a storage area. These storage areas then detain the water, and release it at a slow, controlled rate through a "restrictor". By controlling the discharge from a site in this way, the impact to the receiving system is reduced. The Village Code sets the maximum rate of discharge for a given site, and thereby drives the design of the restrictor. The difference between the rate of discharge through the restrictor and the actual amount of stormwater runoff must be stored on site. For larger sites, stormwater is stored in detention ponds, while stormwater is often stored in underground chambers, oversized sewers, and/or on the parking lot on smaller sites. In recent months, the Village has seen a dramatic rise in the number of small subdivisions; single family homes are being torn down, the lots subdivided, and two homes are then built. The Code does not give credit for redevelopment so any site to be developed or redeveloped is required to Page 2 Proposed Development Code Modifications Fee in Lieu of Stormwater Detention June 9, 2006 meet all Village Ordinances. As a result, these small subdivisions and redevelopment sites are required to provide stormwater detention. (See the attached summary for projects recently constructed or approved for construction.) Practical Limits to the Current Code Small sites, especially small residential subdivisions, present unique challenges and limitations to providing stormwater detention. Section 16.603.C.1.b of the Village Code requires that the restrictor controlling the discharge rate from a detention pond be no smaller than 2" in diameter. This size is recommended as the smallest permitted restrictor in the Northeast Illinois Planning Commission (NIPC) model ordinance because smaller restrictors would likely be prone to becoming blocked with debris, and create maintenance problems. Depending upon the details of the outlet design, a 2" diameter restrictor will typically discharge between 0.17 and 0.28 cubic foot per second (cfs). However, Section 16.602.B.1.b of the Village Code requires that the maximum discharge for a site be limited to 0.2 cfs per acre developed (0.2 cfs/ac). Thus for a 1 acre site, the maximum allowable discharge is 0.2 cfs. Sites smaller than 1 acre would naturally require discharge rates smaller that 0.2 cfs, but these smaller discharge rates cannot be attained because the smallest restrictor permitted will still discharge approximately 0.2 cfs. Consequently, we can calculate smaller discharge rates, and associated detention volumes, but the minimum restrictor size of 2" effectively limits the performance of the detention system. Because of homeowners' tendencies to construct garages, sheds, additions, raised gardens, etc. in large open grassy areas, Section 16.603.A of the Village Code states that "Stormwater detention shall not be permitted in the side or rear yards of any single family residential properties". Stormwater detention on residential properties must therefore be placed underground. To insure that these underground storage chambers remain, and are maintained, an easement is often required. These chambers and easements restrict the use of the property prohibiting the construction of any permanent structures over the stormwater detention facilities. Furthermore, because the detention chambers serve both lots of a subdivision, it is common to install storm sewer along the common property line. These chambers are typically large, with little cover, so they are installed along a property line, it may not be possible to install a fence along that line. It is understood that any individual small site will have insignificant impact on the receiving drainage system. However, the Code was designed to best protect the current and future property owners. Small sites provide small volumes of storage, and therefore small benefit to the system, but as more small sites provide detention storage, the cumulative effect on the system may become significant. Fee in Lieu Rather than have stormwater detention provided on small sites, NIPC included in their model ordinance a mechanism for paying a fee in lieu of detention. This would allow an applicant to avoid the requirement to provide stormwater detention on site by paying a fee to the Village. The Village would then use this fee to benefit the Village's drainage system. Proposed Code Changes We propose that the Village Code be modified to allow a fee to be paid in lieu of providing stormwater detention for all projects less than 1 acre at the option of the Village Engineer. The 1 acre threshold is consistent with the practical design limits of a 2" restrictor. Having the fee be at the Page 3 Proposed Development Code Modifications Fee in Lieu of Stormwater Detention June 9, 2006 option of the Village Engineer preserves the flexibility to still require the detention in hydraulically sensitive areas. We also propose that the fee be assessed based upon the new impervious surface area. Charging a fee per square foot (ft2) appears to be the simplest, and most equitable means of assessing the fee. Some items to consider: 1. Charging the fee based upon square foot ft2 of impervious surfaces would also create the possibility to assess this fee consistently over all new impervious surfaces, such as single family homes, detached garages, and building additions. 2. Charging a fee of $2.00 per ft2 of impervious surfaces would be consistent with the costs the Village is currently paying for earthwork in the detention ponds in the Kensington Business Center. However, even though this fee is in line with current construction costs, it could be seen as excessive in some cases. It may be possible to mitigate the fees for the smallest projects by either of the following: A. Credit could be given for existing impervious surfaces, so the fee would only be based on the net increase in impervious surface. This should not apply to commercial, industrial, or multi-family, and a new decrease in impervious surface should not necessarily warrant a rebate. B. A lesser fee rate could be established for residential sites. Some other municipalities have adopted this fee in lieu of detention into their ordinances, but the implementation varies greatly. Of the municipalities surveyed, the fee ranges from $1.22 per ft2 (Palatine) to $13.16 per ft2 (Park Ridge). (See attached summary.) We will be happy to answer any questions you may have. ~~ Chuck Lindelof C:\Documents and Seltings\clindelo\My Documents\DevCode\Fee in Lieu 06\Prelimlnfo-1.doc ,. --'---- 15.401 15.402 ARTICLE IV DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS SECTION: 15.401 : Scope Of Development Regulations Development Requirements Development Plan Appeals From Decision On Development Plan Public Right Of Way Standards Fees 15.402: 15.403: 15.404: 15.405: 15.406: 15.401: SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: All develop- ments shall be constructed in accordance with the standards set forth in this chapter. No person shall commence or cause to be commenced any of the following develop- ments within the corporate limits of the village unless a development plan has been approved by the director of community development. Development regulations apply to: A. Any residential development of any parcel of land involving construction of two (2) or more dwelling units. B. Any commercial, industrial, multi-fami- ly residential, or institutional develop- ment of any parcel of land involving the construction of any new build- ing(s) or structure(s). Exempt from this are auxiliary structures such as garages and storage facilities for an existing building provided that the footprint area of the auxiliary structure does not exceed twenty five percent (25%) (cumulative) of the footprint area of the primary structure(s). Auxil- iary structures exempt from the re- quirements of section 15.402 of this article shall be subject to the require- ments of section 15.502 of this chap- ter. C. Any development involving the expan- sion by more than twenty five percent (25%) (cumulative) of the footprint of an existing commercial, industrial, multi-family residential, or institutional structure. D. Any new parking lot or parking lot expansion (cumulative) greater than fifty percent (50%) of the original park- ing lot area, and greater than two thousand (2,000) square feet in area. E. Any existing structure to be converted to condominium ownership as de- scribed in section 15.307 of this chap- ter. (Ord. 5253, 5-21-2002) 15.402: DEVELOPMENT REQUIRE- MENTS: Any development as defined in section 15.401 of this article will be required to provide the following: A. All requirements listed under section 15.502, "Site Improvement Require- ments", of this chapter. B. Storm water detention for the entire site. Existing B5C zoning districts shall be exempt from this requirement, and shall only have to provide storm water detention for any increase in Village of Mount Prospect March 2003 15.402 15.403 impervious surface, in accordance with subsection 15.502A of this chap- ter. the surveyor, licensed professional engineer, architect or planner who prepared the plan. C. Curb and gutter around the perimeter of all parking lots and driveways. d. Zoning classifications of the parcel and of adjacent property. D. Parking lot lighting. e. Present uses of the parcel and of adjacent land. E. Streetlights. f. The following signature block: F. Site landscaping. G. All construction shall comply with the construction specifications contained in chapter 16 of this code, and the tree protection standards contained in chapter 9 of this code. (Ord. 5253, 5-21-2002) State of Illinois ) ) 55 County of Cook ) Approved by the Director of Community Development of the Vil- lage of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, this day of ,20. 15.403: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Any person proposing to develop any property within the corporate limits of the village of a type enumerated in section 15.401 of this article shall file with the de- partment of community development a development plan, in a quantity and form as required, as follows: Director of Community Development 2. Existing Conditions: The following conditions, if found to exist on the parcel, shall be shown on the plan, as needed for the particular site: A. Content: a. Date of preparation, north point, and scale of drawing, which shall be no less than one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 1 00'). a. The location, width and names of all streets within or adjacent to the parcel, together with easements, pub- lic utility and railroad rights of way and other important features such as storm sewers, municipal boundary lines, lot corners and monuments, and trunk diameter and location of existing parkway trees. 1. General Information: The following general information, where applicable, shall be shown on the development plan: b. Legal description of the parcel. b. All easements denoted by fine intermittent lines, clearly identified, and if already of record, the recorded references as to use and location of such easements, the width of the easement, its length and bearing, and c. The name and address of the owner of record, the applicant, and March 2003 Village of Mount Prospect 15.501 15.502 ARTICLE V SITE IMPROVEMENT PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS SECTION: 15.501 : Scope Of Site Improvement Regulations Site Improvement Requirements Fees 15.502: 15.503: 15.501: SCOPE OF SITE IMPROVE- MENT REGULATIONS: All improvements shall be constructed in ac- cordance with the standards set forth in this chapter. No person shall commence or cause to be commenced any of the follow- ing improvements within the corporate limits of the village unless a site plan has been approved by the director of community development. Improvement regulations apply to: A. Any construction of a single-family residence on a single parcel of land. B. Any auxiliary structure such as garag- es and storage facilities for an existing building provided that the footprint area of the auxiliary structure does not exceed twenty five percent (25%) (cumulative) of the footprint area of the primary structure(s). C. Any construction involving the expan- sion of the footprint by less than twen- ty five percent (25%) (cumulative) of an existing commercial, industrial, or multi-family residential structure. D. Any parking lot expansion (cumula- tive) less than fifty percent (50%) of the original parking lot area. E. Any installation, extension, or im- provement of a utility main or service. (Ord. 5253, 5-21-2002) 15.502: SITE IMPROVEMENT RE- QUIREMENTS: Any site im- provement as defined in section 15.501 of this article will be required to provide the following: A. Storm water detention for the net increase in impervious surface. Ex- empt from this requirement shall be improvements consisting of the con- struction of a single-family home. B. Full right of way improvements includ- ing the following: 1. Pavement widening as needed. 2. Curb and gutter installation as needed. 3. Public sidewalk along the public right of way adjacent to the site. This sidewalk must be extended along the entire length of the property, even if the scope of improvements would not otherwise extend that far. The side- walk must be installed through any asphalt driveways, but may be gapped at existing concrete driveways. Village of Mount Prospect March 2003 PROPOSED FEE IN LIEU OF DETENTION IMPACTS New Required Estimated Estimate of Proposed Impervious Storage Construction Fee in Lieu Amounts Developmentsllmprovements Site Area Area Volume Cost Rate = $2.00 Rate = $1.00 (acres) (acres) (ac-ft) Residential Subdivisions Gettysburg on Edgewood1 0.52 0.26 0.08 $ 31,100.00 $ 22,651.20 $ 11,325.60 (901 Edgewood Lane) (max. lot coverage) Kelly's Subdivision2 0.44 0.22 0.07 $ 28,200.00 $ 19,166.40 $ 9,583.20 (416 S. Maple Street) (max. lot coverage) Vi ken's Subdivision3 0.56 0.28 0.11 ? $ 24,393.60 $ 12,196.80 (1209 W. Lincoln Street) (max. lot coverage) Westgate Subdivision3 0.96 0.48 0.22 $ 60,000.00 $ 41,817.60 $ 20,908.80 (309 Westgate Road) (max. lot coverage) Residential Improvements New Single Family Home 1.64 0.82 0.00 $ - $ 71,438.40 $ 35,719.20 (115 Busse Road1) (max. lot coverage) New Single Family Home 0.46 0.23 0.00 $ - $ 20,037.60 $ 10,018.80 (1016 Meadow Ln.2) (max. lot coverage) New Single Family Home 0.19 0.095 0.00 $ - $ 8,276.40 $ 4,138.20 (207 Bobby Ln.3) (max. lot coverage) Detached Garage varies 0.015 0.00 $ - $ 1,344.00 $ 672.00 (Maximum Permitted Size, 672 ff) Building Expansion varies 0.009 0.00 $ - $ 800.00 $ 400.00 (Assumed Typical Size of 20' x 20' = 400 ff) New Required Estimated Estimate of Proposed Impervious Storage Construction Fee in Lieu Amounts Developments/Improvements Site Area Area Volume Cost Rate = $2.00 Rate = $1.00 (acres) (acres) ( ac-ft) Commercial/Industrial X-Press-O International1 0.24 0.095 0.056 $ 5,200.00 $ 8,276.40 $ 4,138.20 (199 W. Rand Rd.) Phillips 662 0.51 0.34 0.16 ? $ 29,620.80 $ 14,810.40 (2 E. Rand Rd.) Taco Bell2 0.53 0.38 0.17 $ 35,000.00 $ 33,105.60 $ 16,552.80 (2410 E. Rand Rd.) Notes 1 Construction completed 2 Currently under construction 3 Currently under review COMPARISON OF POSSIBLE FEE RATES 1 ft2 of new impervious surface generates 0.38 ft3 of required storage Community Hoffman Estates $ 1.00 fft3 of storage $ 2.63 ffe of new impervious $ 43,560.00 fac-ft Park Ridge $ 5.00 fft3 of storage $ 13.16 fft2 of new impervious $ 217,800.00 fac-ft North brook $ 0.61 fft3 of storage $ 1.60 /fe of new impervious $ 26,484.48 fac-ft Palatine $ 0.46 fft3 of storage $ 1.22 ffe of new impervious $ 20,186.00 fac-ft $60fyd3 Earthwork $15fyd3 Earthwork $ 2.22 /ft3 of storage $ 0.56 fft3 of storage $ 5.85 ffe of new impervious $ 1.46 ffe of new impervious $ 96,800.00 fac-ft $ 24,200.00 fac-ft Note: Undelined amounts indicate the basis on which the fee is developed. Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERINTENDENT DATE: JUNE 8, 2006 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL WHEELED CART POLICY OPTIONS Residents have inquired about the availability of a second wheeled cart for refuse since the first informational flyers were mailed. The Village's standard response to these inquires has been, "all refuse and recycling must be contained in the cart and any refuse or recycling outside of the cart will not be collected. If the cart is not meeting your needs please call us in June to discuss options available to you." The Public Works Department has developed the policy options described below to address the issue of the availability and use of multiple carts for refuse and recycling servIce. The new solid waste program is designed around the concept of a fully automated system and success hinges on residents using the carts. In a few circumstances the maximum issue of a 95 gallon refuse and a 65 gallon recycling cart does not offer enough capacity on a weekly basis. To address this situation the Public Works department is proposing the following options to make available multiple refuse and/or recycling carts Option 1: In 2006, the total cost of solid waste collection per household is $211.32 annually. The annual cost for solid waste services is a combination of several costs that include: $119.76 paid to ARC for collection, $16.08 for the Village's leaf program, $62.28 tipping fee paid to SW ANCC and a $13.20 Village administrative and billing fees. Due to the unlimited nature of the new solid waste contract with ARC Disposal if additional refuse carts are offered the only additional cost the Village will incur is the $62.28 (fee is based on one 95 gallon cart) tipping fee paid to SW ANCC. Therefore the Public Works department is proposing an annual cart fee of $60 per additional refuse cart ,regardless of size (refuse carts are available in 35, 65 or 95 gallon capacity), to offset the additional tipping cost. Option 2: The second option the Public Works department is proposing is to charge residents a one time rental fee for each refuse cart with pricing based on the purchase price of the cart. In 2006 the cost of a 35, 65, and 95 gallon cart is $42, $52, and $57 respectively. The resident would pay this one time rental fee to the Village, which would allow the resident unlimited use of the cart until the resident decides to discontinue service or moves away from the Village. Upon discontinuation of service the cart remains the Village's property and must be returned to the Village. Option 3: For recycling the Public Works department is proposing to charge residents a one time rental fee for each recycling cart with pricing based on the purchase price of the cart. In 2006 the cost of a 35 and 65 gallon cart is $42 and $52 respectively. The resident would pay this one time rental fee to the Village, which would allow the resident unlimited .. use of the cart until the resident decides to discontinue service or move from the Village. Upon discontinuation of service the cart remains the Village's property and must be returned to the Village. In the case of all three options residents will be allowed to pay for an additional refuse and/or recycling cart at the Public Works facility. Public Works will coordinate the distribution of the additional carts with ARC Disposal. The goal of the Village's new wheeled cart program is to achieve efficiency in collection through a fully automated system and to maximize recycling efforts, not to provide residents with as many refuse carts as they want. By charging the additional fee for refuse residents are forced to examine their habits and make a determination if the second cart is really needed. In addition the fee compels residents to determine if their recycling cart is being fully utilized. If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. /::(~ Cc: Glen R. Andler, Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey, Deputy Director of Public Works MAYOR Irvana K. Wilks TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert A. John Korn Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele W. Skowron Michael A. Zadel Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 MOUNT PROSPECT YOUTH COMMISSION AGENDA JUNE 14,2006 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE HEADQUARTERS 112 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY 7:00 P.M. I. II. III. IV. V. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. VIllI. X. XI. Call To Order Roll Call Approval of March 01,2006 Minutes Approval of April 05, 2006 Minutes Approval of May 03, 2006 Minutes Bicycle Helmet Safety Committee Youth View Committee Special Events Committee Ordinance Review Committee Old Business New Business Other Business Adjournment VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK M. Lisa Angell Phone: 847/392-6000 Fax: 847/392-6022 www.mountprospect.org It is the general expectation of the Mount Prospect Youth Commission that all members attend every meeting. If you are unable to attend a meeting, please contact Chairwoman Sarah Corcoran - 847-506-9232, Co-Chairwoman Nicole Braus - 847- 439-3261, or Secretary Cindy Rumore - 847-818-5237, by phone or bye-mail, 24 hours prior to the meeting. In an emergency, you may call the meeting room at the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Headquarters at 847-818-5337 at the time of the meeting. Upcoming meetings are scheduled for: - July 12,2006 - August 02, 2006 - Youth Commission Elections - Septem ber 06, 2006 __-==>===""",,~""""""""""""''''''"'.'''-=='l'''"=~_=:w.-==''''='''''''~^_~~'''"~'~=~''''''_ MAYOR Irvana K. Wilks TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert A. John Korn Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele W. Skowron Michael A. Zadel PRESENT: ABSENT: GUESTS: VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK M. Lisa Angell Phone: 847/392-6000 Fax: 847/392-6022 www.moun tprospect. or~ Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 MOUNT PROSPECT YOUTH COMMISSION MINUTES MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE HEADQUARTERS 112 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY WEDNESDAY, MAY 03, 2006 7:00 P.M. ALYSSA HILLMAN, CHAIRWOMAN PRO TEMP BRENT BUSSE MICHAEL HIGGINSON NICOLE LOGISZ ANDREW STEINWEG DEREK STEINWEG AI A KIMBERLEY NAGEL A/A DAVID SCHEIN AlA PATTI WALPOLE SECRETARY CINDY RUMORE MICHAEL ARTWOHL, TIMOTHY ARTWOHL, NICOLE BRAUS, SARAH CORCORAN, CHRISTY LUKAS, JAMES RUETSCHE, MELODY RUETSCHE, AlA LARRY BRAUS, AlA BRIAN GILLIGAN, AlA RICHARD LOHRSTORFER MR. GEORGE CLOWES PAUL BERAUER - PROSPECTIVE NEW MEMBER FROM PROSPECT HIGH SCHOOL CALL TO ORDER CHAIRWOMAN PRO TEMP AL YSSA HILLMAN CALLED THE MAY 03, 2006 YOUTH COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER AT 7:15 P.M. IN THE FIRST FLOOR TRAINING ROOM OF THE POLICE AND FIRE HEADQUARTERS, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS. ROLL CALL SECRETARY CINDY RUMORE READ ROLL CALL. """"",,,,'~~._=~."==.;,,:w''j7W;r-=Z~0:='-~''''''''=='=~='''''='''''''''''''_.-'1''''''''''''''''''''_~~-=<""~~~".,.,,,:.,-~ MOUNT PROSPECT YOUTH COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 03, 2006 PAGE TWO APPROV AL OF MINUTES DUE TO ATTENDANCE, THERE WAS NO QUORUM AND THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 01, 2006 AND APRIL 05, 2006 YOUTH COMMISSION MEETINGS WERE NOT APPROVED. BICYCLE HELMET COMMITTEE - ANDREW STEINWEG ALYSSA HILLMAN, NICOLE LOGISZ, DEREK STEINWEG DEREK STEINWEG TO FORWARD COpy OF CAPANNARI'S COUPON TO BRENT BUSSE TO PRINT FOR THE JUNE MEETING. DETAILS OF EXPIRATION DATE AND NUMBERING OF COUPONS TO BE DISCUSSED AND APPROVED WITH CAPANNARI'S PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTING. MEMBERS DISCUSSED THE DISTRIBUTION OF COUPONS AT COMMUNITY EVENTS AND BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. DEREK STEINWEG TO CHECK WITH OFFICER ROSCOP, POLICE DEPARTMENT, TO CHECK AVAILABILTY OF THE BIKE UNIT OFFICERS DISTRIBUTING THE COUPONS. YOUTH VIEW COMMITTEE - SARAH CORCORAN MICHAEL ARTWOHL, TIMOTHY ARTWOHL, NICOLE BRADS YOUTH VIEW TAPING "JUDGING RECENT ELECTIONS" WAS TAPED THURSDAY, APRIL 20, 2006. MEMBERS DISCUSSED TOPICS FOR FUTURE YOUTH VIEW SHOWS: COLLEGE ADMISSIONS, MYSPACE.COM, COOK COUNTY SMOKING BAN. MR. GEORGE CLOWES DISCUSSSED PARTICIPATING IN A REMOTE YOUTH VIEW TAPING ON THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2006 AT THE MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY. THE WILD STING ROBOTICS TEAM CONSISTING OF STUDENTS FROM ROLLING MEADOWS AND WHEELING HIGH SCHOOLS, WILL BE GIVING A ROBOT DEMONSTRATION. THEY RECENTLY WON TOP NATIONAL HONORS BEATING 1,130 TEAMS. INTERESTED MEMBERS TO CONTACT MR. GEORGE CLOWES TO PARTICIPATE. SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE - CHRISTY LUKAS VILLAGE EVENTS BRENT BUSSE TO CONTACT JIM USZLER FROM THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REGARDING THE YOUTH COMMISSION PARTICIPATING IN THE CHAMBER'S SATURDAY NIGHT CAR EVENT. MEMBERS DISCUSSED POSSIBLE PARTICIPATION IN THE JULY 4TH PARADE. ANDREW STEINWEG TO CONTACT CHRISTY LUKAS TO ARRANGE FOR A SPACE FOR THE YOUTH COMMISSION IN THE PARADE AND CONFIRM WITH SECRETARY CINDY RUMORE. ___ __ ___._,.___._.__."_.__."~_~____~_~'~'~'_~~"='.~'_"'r.=',=,_"'__=__""___---=~."".""',.=_;.".".."",0.\I""">;::~w:w""=,,~~=m_""""'~="="Ic.:m;'''\,~",.":"'''~..''':'''"'""''''*~''''''''''''''_''''''''''...,~,~''''''"~^'''~~.,...,,,,,'c==''_''''''''''_.,,~ MOUNT PROSPECT YOUTH COMMISSION MINUTES MA Y 03, 2006 PAGE THREE ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE - BRENT BUSSE MICHAEL HIGGINSON MA YOR WILKS TO DISCUSS ORDINANCE REVIEWS WITH THE VILLAGE BOARD AND WILL ADVISE THE YOUTH COMMISSION. OLD BUSINESS MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY DISPLAY CASE AL YSSA HILLMAN AND NICOLE LOGISZ REMOVED THE YOUTH COMMISSION DISPLAY FROM THE LIBRARY. MICHAEL HIGGINSON TO CHECK WITH LIBRARY PERSONNEL TO SEE IF A PICTURE WAS TAKEN OF THE DISPLAY FOR THE YOUTH COMMISSION ARCHIVES. SUMMER YOUTH COMMISSION MEETINGS MEMBERS DISCUSSED SCHEDULES FOR SUMMER YOUTH COMMISSION MEETINGS. MEMBERS DECIDED TO DELAY THE JUNE MEETING DUE TO SCHOOL FINALS TO WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 2006 AND TO DELAY THE JULY MEETING DUE TO JULY 4TH HOLIDA Y / V ACA nON SCHEDULES TO WEDNESDA Y, JULY 12, 2006. THE AUGUST MEETING WOULD BE THE REGULAR SCHEDULED DATE OF WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 02, 2006. NEW BUSINESS SISTER CITIES COMMISSION A/A PATTI WALPOLE AND SECRETARY CINDY RUMORE MET WITH MAYOR WILKS TO DISCUSS SEVERAL ISSUES. MAYOR WILKS DISCUSSED THE POSSIBILITY OF YOUTH COMMISSION MEMBERS CORRESPONDING WITH THE YOUTH FROM OUR SISTER CITY, SEVRES, FRANCE. A TRIP TO FRANCE IS BEING PLANNED FOR THE SPRING OF 2007 AND INTERESTED YOUTH COMMISSION MEMBERS COULD PARTICIPATE WITH THE SISTER CITIES COMMISSION IN THE VISIT. MEMBERS WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR AIRF ARE BUT THEY WOULD BE HOUSED WITH SISTER CITIES MEMBERS IN FRANCE. INTERESTED MEMBERS SHOULD PLAN ON ATTENDING SISTER CITIES COMMISSION MEETINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. SISTER CITIES MEETINGS MEET THE THIRD THURSDA Y OF MARCH, JUNE, SEPTEMBER, AND DECEMBER AT 5:30 P.M AT THE VILLAGE HALL COMMUNITY ROOM. SMOKING BAN ORDINANCE MA YOR WILKS DISCUSSED THE COOK COUNTY CLEAN AIR ORDINANCE. COPIES WERE DISTRIBUTED TO ALL MEMBERS FOR REVIEW AND DISCUSSION AT A LATER MEETING. COFFEE WITH COUNCIL NEXT MEETING: SA TURDA Y, JULY 08, 2006 9:00 A.M. - 11 :00 A.M. - VILLAGE HALL 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT YOUTH COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 03, 2006 PAGE FOUR MOTION TO ADJOURN MOTION: TO ADJOURN THE MAY 03, 2006 YOUTH COMMISSION MEETING. 1 ST NICOLE LOGISZ 2ND BRENT BUSSE UNANIMOUS BY ALL YOUTH COMMISSION MEMBERS MEETING ADJOURNED CHAIRWOMAN PRO TEMP ALYSSA HILLMAN ADJOURNED THE MEETING AT 8:25 P.M. Icjr MAYOR Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert A. John Korn Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele W. Skowron Michael A. Zadel Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 VILLAGE CLERK A. Lisa Angell Phone: 847/818-5328 Fax: 847/818-5329 TDD: 847/392-6064 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING LOCATION: Community Center V illage Hall 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 MEETING DATE & TIME: Thursday June 15, 2006 8:00 a.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 20, 2006 meeting IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Development Update B. CornEd Business Retention Program Recap V. NEW BUSINESS A. 2006 Economic Development Budget VI. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT VII. ADJOURNMENT Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 50 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6014 C:\Documents and Settings\kdewis\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK6B\6R15-06 EDC agenda. doc MAYOR Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert A. John Korn Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele Skowron Irvana K. Wilks Michael A. Zade! Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 VILLAGE CLERK M. Lisa Angell Phone: 847/818-5328 Fax: 847/8 I 8-5329 TDD: 847/392-6064 MINUTES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 1st Floor Community Center, Village Hall Thursday, April 20, 2006 8:00 a.m. The meeting of the Economic Development Commission (EDe) ofthe Village of Mount Prospect was held on Thursday April 20, 2006 in the first floor Community Center of Village Hall, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. CALL TO ORDER Chairman David Lindgren called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m. Commissioners Ken Fritz, Tom Zander Michaele Skowron and Ben Trapani were present. Also present were Mayor Irvana Wilks, Bill Cooney, Director of Community Development, Ellen Divita, Deputy Director of Community Development and Jim Uszler, Executive Director ofthe Chamber of Commerce. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the February 2,2006 meeting were reviewed and approved unanimously. OLD BUSINESS Development Update Mr. Cooney provided a general overview of developments throughout the Village. He stated that Opus had submitted plans for their two industrial buildings on Algonquin and Linneman Roads and are hoping begin construction by mid-May. He stated that Alexian Brothers had purchased the Twin Links batting cage and miniature golffacility and were planning a 40,000 square foot medical facility on that site. Norwood Builders is progressing on both the Founders Rowand Emerson projects and both are likely to be completed by the end of 2006. The Commission asked Mr. Cooney how successful the retail consultant had been to date. Mr. Cooney provided a general update of Ms. Maloney activities. The Commission asked that Ms. Maloney appear at their June meeting to provide a general update on her activities. T .I.F. Amendment 3 Mr. Cooney stated that the Village was still waiting on the resolution on some property tax matters prior to completing the T.I.F. amendment process. He stated that the ordinances had been introduced by the Village Board and were being deferred until final action had been taken on the tax matter. He stated that Dr. Oztekin is moving forward with his restaurant/entertainment district for the small triangle area and he has acquired several properties in the area. Staff is currently reviewing parking options, including underground parking in this area. CornEd Business Retention Program Mr. Cooney stated that several members made visits to retail operators in March. It appeared the 8 :00 starting time was not as conducive for retailers as the group had originally anticipated. He stated that for the May visits the group would go back to the 9:00, 10:00 and 11 :00 visits to better address the schedules of the retailers. He stated that he would attempt to schedule these appointments so the groups could make visits in one shopping center to minimize drive-time between visits. Economic Development Commission Apri120, 2006 Minutes Page 2 NEW BUSINESS 2005 Annual Report Mr. Cooney indicated he had forwarded the annual report for the Commission's review and asked for comments on the document. Commission members had suggestions for minor modifications to the document. They discussed whether they should make a formal presentation to the Village Board in the up-coming weeks. Mayor Wilks stated that she thought it would be a good idea for the Commission to make a presentation, similarly to how other Commissions do, at a regular Board meeting. Chairman Lindgren indicated he would be willing to make the presentation. Mr. Cooney said that Staff would prepare a PowerPoint presentation for Chairman Lindgren's review, for a future Board meeting. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT There was no Chairman's report. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 a.ill. Respectfully submitted, William J. Cooney, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development WJC:sld C:\Documents and Settings\kdewis\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK6B\ApriI20.doc Mount Prospect Director Glen R. Andler Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA MEETING LOCATION: Pu blic Works Building 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 MEETING DATE AND TIME: Monday ]une12,2006 7:00 p.m. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Minutes IV. Citizens to be Heard V. Old Business VI. New Business A. Traffic Study at Forest View Elementary School VII. Commission Issues VIII. Adjournment Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 www.mountprospect.org