Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
7.2 PZ 26-18 200 & 204 W. Rand Road - First Reading of an Ordinance Granting Zoning Map Amendment
BoardDocs® Pro Page 1 of 2 Agenda Item Details Meeting Feb 1, 2019 - REGULAR MEETING OF THEM UT PROSPECT VILLA ARD - 7:00 p.m. Category GRANTINGSubject 7.2 PZ -26-18 / 200 & 204 W. Rand Road / GW Properties / 1st reading of an ORDINANCE . O. 200 & 204 W. RAND ROAD Access Public Type Action Preferred Date Feb 19, 2011 Absolute Date Feb 19, 2019 ImpactFiscal • Recommended Action Approval of a zoning map amendment from R -X Single Family Residence to -3 Community Shopping and conditional use for a drive-through establishment, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Goals 22. awl&ii� IR vi t I i tion : Next Steps Public Content Petitioner,The • •- • of ••- • a zoning•- to B-3 Community Shopping and . conditional use for Subjectdrive-through restaurant establishment to construct a new Wendy's at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road. The Subject Property is located on Rand Road and currently consists of two single-family homes that have historically been rented as tracked through the Village's rental license program. •-History Both single-family parcels included in the request have been the subject of various and recent code violations. The single-family home at 200 W. Rand Road has been vacant for three years and been the subject of complaints, including dumpsters at the property, long grass and weeds, painting/deterioration to the exterior of the home, litter on the ground and dead trees at the lot. Recent complaints for the house at 204 W. Rand Road include dumpsters at the property, long grass and weeds, a loud generator running, rats seen at the property and dead trees/brush at the lot. .e •Proposal As seen in the attached plans, the proposed Wendy's is 2,584 square feet and includes a drive-through and associated parking lot. Additional improvements!- ••landscaped • •• • tall privacy fence alongsingle-family east.homes to the proposal includes• parking spacescode requires- • 1 parking spaces. Zoning# - Planning Documents The proposal is consistent with surrounding commercial zoning and land uses found to the west and south. The Subject Property borders the B4 Commercial Corridor District to the west and the B3 Community Shopping District to the south. A Chick-fil-A restaurant is immediately adjacent to the south of the property, and a commercial strip center, including a grocery store, is across the street (west) on Rand Road. The proposal is consistent with Village long range plans and the Village's Strategic Plan. The Village Comprehensive Plan of 2017 designates these specific parcels as corridor commercial on the future land use map, and the Rand Road Corridor Plan identifies the Subject Property as a potential area for redevelopment. The Village Strategic Plan's objectives include attracting local and regional customers to the Village with restaurant establishments, facilitating restaurant development, and addressing aging, antiquated housing stock that may need replacement and declining the EAV. The applicant's proposal is similar to many other commercial developments along Rand Road that are immediately adjacent to residential neighborhoods, such as the recently approved Mount Prospect Pointe development (rezoning to B3, PUD with Conditional Use for a drive-through), and would have to comply with Village regulations that are designed to address thesea • https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 2/19/2019 BoardDocs® Pro Page 2 of 2 Adjacent Neighborhood Concerns Staff received several written statements and a signed petition against the proposal from adjacent property owners. Comments received include concerns with the hours of operation, noise, littering and cut thru traffic. The applicant has provided a response to these items which includes the following: Providing additional dense and mature landscaping along the north and east lot lines abutting the single-family homes, Relocating the dumpsters farther away from the residential homes, to the southwest corner next to the commercial property, Restricting the hours of operation to 10PM for the dining room and 12PM (midnight) for the drive-thru, The applicant is willing to increase the fence height to 8 or 10 feet, pending variation approval from the Village Board. The maximum 6 -foot fence high is currently proposed. In addition, Village staff met with Chick-fil-A representatives to address operational concerns that were raised by adjacent neighbors in both correspondence to staff ! as testimony at the Planning and Zoning/Village Board meetings.• ! to modify their delivery, maintenance ! garbage collectionoperations,including hours of o address raised concerns. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the requests at the Public Hearing held on January 10, 2019, and recommended denying the Petitioner's requests for a zoning map amendment and a conditional use by a vote of 3-1. 1. A Zoning Map Amendment from R -X Single Family Residence to B-3 Community Shopping for 200 and 204 W. Rand Road"'; 2. A Conditional Use permit for a drive-through establishment at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road, Case No. PZ -26-18, subject to the following • • • 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan and elevations prepared by MRV Architects, Inc.; 2. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village codes and regulations; . Submittal of an irrigation and photometric plan that comply with Village Code requirements; 4. All exterior lighting shall be full cutoff and pointed straight down; . All rooftop units shall be screened from the public right-of-way and property line of all adjacent residentially zoned property; and 6. An administrative plat of resubdivision shall be recorded with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds before a Certificate of Occupancy may be issued. 7. Hours of operation shall be limited to 10 PM for the dining room and midnight for the drive -through. 2. Action at discretion of the Village Board. Staff Recommendation Village staff recommends that the Village Board approve the Zoning Map Amendment and Conditional Use requests, subject to the conditions noted above. The proposal is consistent with development along the Rand Road Corridor and with several long-range planning documents adopted by the Village. In addition, the petitioner has provided a landscaped buffer to the adjacent single-family to the east, and must abide by the Ordinance conditions on hours of operation and other village ordinances. d is ii irn ii stir. ti C ire t irn t . Ir d (2,183 I i Ire Ire Il ii ��. ire t' s Ir e ire seg Ir d (� ,� . I Il �. ire Ir � i (, ,� I I bIliic C is is o irn t . Ire d (, I - 2 - 1CU 200--204 ire ire d Ire d (2 n I O ird � ire i� ire Map is ire is o ire �,� Ird (1 I: Administrative Content Executive Content https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 2/19/2019 January 14, 2019 William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Via email: bcooney@mountprospect.org Dear Mr. Cooney, The Planning & Zoning Commission did not recommended approval of our Zoning Map Amendment & Conditional Use by a 3-1 vote. Our request is scheduled to go before Village Board for the ordinances first reading February 5, 2019. We are requesting that the Village Board waive the second reading, tentatively scheduled for TBD, and take final action at the February 5, 2019 meeting because we are a contract purchaser and would like a definitive resolution as soon as possible so we can move the project forward and begin building as soon as possible. I appreciate your assistance in facilitating this request. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact us at 847-903-2024 or Jon@gwproperties.com. Sincerely, 7d, Jon Silverberg 2211 N Elston Ave Suite 304 Chicago, IL 60614 71--illage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -26-18 wtTyl"Virs-ri, I'll I �f M I PETITIONER: GW Properties OWNER: Benjamin Figueroa PARCEL#: 03-27-307-007-0000, 03-27-307006-0000 LOT SIZE: 0.957 acres (41,673 sq. ft.) ZONING: RX Single Family Residential LAND USE: Detached Single Family Homes (2) REQUEST: Zoning Map Amendment from RX Single Family to B3 Community Shopping Conditional use to allow a drive-through establishment Village olf Mouut Pirospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSIOI JOSEPH DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON 1710 i t 901F 111101651 wvflf, w�� SUBJECT: PZ -26-18 / 200 & 204 W. RAND ROAD / ZONING MAP AMENDMENT ANU CONDITIONAL USE (DRIVE-THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the January 10, 2019 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Jon Silverberg from GW Properties (the "Petitioner"), regarding the property located at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a zoning map amendment from RX Single Family Residence District to B3 Community Shopping District and a conditional use to all a drive-through establishment. The P&Z Commission hearing was properly noticed in the December 26, 2018 edition of the Daily Herald newspaper. In addition, P. completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 - feet and staff posted public hearing signs on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the north side of Rand Road between Elmhurst Road and Wedgewood Lane. The Subject Property consists of two detached single-family homes and is zoned R -X Single Family Residence. It k� tV-Ad**w*rrw_*i.d Development (PUD) to the south, and the R -X Single Family Residence District to the west and north. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner is proposing to demolish the two existing single-family homes and construct a new drive-through establishment with related improvements. The project requires a zoning map amendment and conditional use approval to allow the proposed drive-through establishment. The various elements of the proposal are outlined Melow. 41osea to nave Tin I access onto A ana K oa guW WIL11 L11C !Ulin U1 111,;10" Ntryess L)i tfic I V7,17 the other side of Rand Road. Lot Qove!Agp,- The Village Code allows a maximum of seventy-five percent (75%) overall lot coverage in the B3 Community Shopping District. The proposed lot coverage is 56.5%. PZ -26-18 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 10, 2019 Page 3 . - I 6=0"W" Setbacks: _._PARAeuirements fropo�al — -------- - ----- ------------ 30' Min. (building) 53'-9" (building) Front(S) 10' Min. (parking) 10' (parking lot) Interior Side (E) 10'Min. (building) 91' (building) 10'Min. (parking) 10' (parking lot) ( }10' M '-6" (building) Interior Side (buildingg)..____............____.5 pin. 10'Min. arin 10' (parking lot) --------------- - - ---- ...... . .......... .. . . ___.."""_'_"____ -------- - - - --- 3 0' Min. (building) - ------ -------------------------- 64'- 10" (building) Rear (N) 30' Min. (parking) 30' (parking lot) -111-111 ................ Lot Coverage 75% Max. 56.5% ........... . . . 1 B I Idi fdevations - The elevation plans indicate the building materials will consist of brick and fiber cement panel walls, glass, and metal accents, The elevations indicate the principal building will measure twenty-four feet (24') tall. Trash Enclosure - A trash enclosure will be located at the northwest corner of the parking lot. The elevation plans indicate the enclosure will have brick walls and solid metal doors. Mechanical and Utili - The plans indicate rooftop mounted mechanical/utility equipment. This jy_j pmgtq equipment will be required to be screened so that it is not visible from the property line or right-of-way. The plans do not indicate any ground mounted mechanical/utility equipment. and foundation landscaping are also provided. The Zoning Ordinance requires the installation of an automatic underground sprinkling system. An irrigation plan was not submitted and will be required for the proposed development. Light-ing -The proposed illumination levels along the western lot line exceed the maximum allowed (0.1 fe). The elevations indicate that lighting will not be full cutoff, which is required. The Petitioner is not seeking variations to the lighting requirements and will be subject to comply with the Village Code. Traffic - Staff is not concerned about the traffic generated by the proposed development. The Subject Property is adiacent to Rand Road and several large commercial developm_eA1t-,.ar_e_.m_the imm I ii 9-Xf im y7x" are anticipated. The entrance was also aligned with the southern entrance of the Randhurst Commons ShoM " , onflicts along Rand Road. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS Fire - A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFA 13 and a fire alarm system will be required. All new sprinkler risers and associated equipment shall be located in a separate room with a minimum of one-hour construction. PZ -26-18 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 10, 2019 Page 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as corridor commercial. This land use designation is appropriate for large fonnat retail, restaurants, and other commercial uses. The proposed zoning map amendment to B-3 Community Shopping would allow uses consistent with those operating in the immediate area. The proposed land use is consistent with the Village's Comprehensive Plan. MAP AMENDMENT STANDARDS The standards for map amendments are listed in Section 14.203.D.8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance. When a 11��" ngs based uyon the evidence �xesented to it in each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters: • The compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area oft e property in question-, • The compatibility oft e surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification-, • The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning classifications-, and • Consistency with the trend of development inthe general area of the property in question, and the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. roadway and that the permitted uses of the B-3 Community Shopping District are appropriate. Potential permitted land uses would be consistent with the development in the area. 111 11 ip 11111711i �0111111UIIILJ all t lll?�. 11KC-PY-ur-41 area, with Chick-fil-A abutting the Subject Property and a commercial PUD located across the street. The future land use map in the Village Comprehensive Plan designates the property as commercial. Staff believes that the permitted uses in the B-3 Community Shopping District are compatible with uses the Petitioner is proposing to provide six-foot (6') privacy fences and landscaping along the property lines abutting single-family homes. CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for conditional uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a conditional use. The following list is a summary oft ese findings: The conditional use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The conditional use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity orimpede the orderly development of those properties-, • There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets-, and • The request is in compliance of the conditional use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. Per the Petitioner, the proposed drive-through will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the public. The proposed drive-through is designed with the safety of all drivers and surrounding properties in mind, with headlights facing Rand Road as customers wait to pick up food at the pick-up window. Ingress and egress will be designed as to minimize congestion and traffic on the Subject Property, PZ -26-18 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting January 10, 2019 Page 5 Village staff believes the Petitioner's conditional use request complies with the conditional use standards and is supportive. The proposed drive-through will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, Yr_*_Vj9jALC f*r_tWlit1e97i.r5,ixzge,_9i4 de—sigy is y� *_'O&d so as to minimize congestion. The Village Code requires stacking for eight (8) cars in a drive-through, while the Petitioner is providing stacking for ten (10) cars. A six-foot (6') privacy fence and landscaping are provided along property lines adjacent to single-family homes, screening the proposed use from adjacent property owners. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will satisfy all applicable Village Ordinances. RECOMMENDATION conditional use standards, subject to complying with the conditions listed below, and that granting such requests would be in the best interest of the Village, Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt stafl7s findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend ApgL_ of the following motions: 1. "To approve a Zoning Map Amendment from R -X Single Family Residence to B-3 Community Shopping for 200 and 204 W. Rand Road"; and approve a Conditional Use permit for a drive-through establishment at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road, Case No. PZ -26-18, subject to the following conditions: I . Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan and elevations prepared by MRV Architects, Inc.; 2. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village codes and regulations; 3. Submittal of an irrigation and photometric plan that comply with Village Code requirements; 4. All exterior lighting shall be full cutoff and pointed straight down; 5All rooftop units shall be screened from the public right-of-way and property line of all adjacent residentially zoned property; and 6. An administrative plat of resubdivision shall be recorded with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds before a Certificate of Occupancy may be issued." VOV-:1 William J. Cooney, A I 'P Director of Community Development C AJ J. ... .1j!4,.Mc,W,IWZ-26-N 200 & AN VV (('U I d", 20 N. Wacker Drive, Ste 1660 Chicago, Illinois 60606-2903 T 312 984 6400 F 312 984 6444 KLEIN, THORPE & JENKINS, LTD. Attorneys at Law MEMORANDUM To: Michael Cassady, Village Manager Nellie Beckner, Assistant Village Manager William Cooney, Director of Community Development From: Lance C. Malina, Brian A.F. Gorka Date: January 17, 2019 Subject: Covenants at 200 and 204 West Rand Road 15010 S. Ravinia Avenue, Ste 10 Orland Park, Illinois 60462-5353 T 708 349 3888 F 708 349 1506 www.ktjlaw.com Last year, staff asked us to look into what impact, if any, the recorded covenants for 200 and 204 West Rand Road (project site) may have on potential commercial developments. It is our conclusion that the covenants themselves will not likely stifle any commercial development, and even if they had the potential to do so, this should not be part of the Village's zoning process. The Wedgewood Terrace Subdivision is a 1950s development of single family residences. As part of the development, all residences and all properties in the Subdivision carry covenants. The project site is part of the Subdivision, and therefore falls under the Covenants. The project site is currently zoned residential. Commercial developers have expressed interest in future development of the project site. The Covenants purport to apply to this future development. There are twelve Covenants (A through L). Covenant A sets forth a general prohibition on building construction without the approval of a committee of three persons, or their designees. Covenant A states that the committee's powers and duties "shall cease on and after January 1970 ... unless prior to (January 1970) a written instrument shall be executed by then record owners of a majority of the lots in the (Wedgewood Terrace Subdivision) and duly recorded appointing a representative(s) ... who shall thereafter exercise the same powers as previously exercised by said committee." According to staff, there are no other recorded documents regarding forming a committee beyond January 1970. Therefore, Covenant A's general prohibition on building construction without approval is not applicable to any potential commercial development. Covenant D prohibits any "noxious or offensive trade" on any lot in the Subdivision. Covenant D also states: "nor shall anything be done thereon which may or become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood." While this appears to impact commercial development, note that the committee in Covenant A was supposed to be the decision maker as to what is noxious, offensive, annoying, or a nuisance ("Decision to rest with the committee as provided for in Section A above"). Therefore, without a committee, a claim that a commercial development is an "annoyance or nuisance" will likely be unenforceable. Covenant B restricts the "main face of any building" from construction closer than either 50 feet or 25 feet if there is a corresponding 50 foot or 25 foot "building line shown on the plat map." This Covenant may limit the size of a potential commercial development's "main face", but is not an outright ban on commercial development. In similar fashion, Covenant H ("easements affecting all lots in this subdivision are reserved, as shown on this plat for utility installation and maintenance"), has the potential to limit the size of a commercial development, but is not an outright ban on commercial development. According to Covenant J, the covenants run with the land and bind all parties and all persons until January 1, 1970 and automatically extend for successive 10 year periods unless a majority of the Subdivision owners vote to change the covenants. According to staff, there are no other recorded documents regarding the covenants beyond January 1970. However, it is not the Village's responsibility to enforce the covenants. Covenant K sets forth that other Subdivision owners may go to court to enforce the covenants. The Village would only need to analyze the Covenants if they may be in conflict with the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety and welfare (Ch. 15.104). The analysis for a map amendment does not include consideration of private restrictive covenants (Ch. 14.203(d)(8)(a). It would not be the Village's place to get involved in enforcement of the Covenants. Therefore, issues with any commercial development and the Covenants are a private matter between private landowners. If you have any questions or if we can provide any further information, please let us know. INVillage of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone: (847) 818-5328 Zoning Request Application Official Use Only (To be completed by Village Staff) Case Number. PU - - Date of Submission: Hearing Date: Project NamelAddress: I. Subject Property Address(es): Zoning District (s) Property Area (Sq. Ft. and/or Acreage): Parcel Index u r(s) (PIN(s):„ It. Zoning"Request(s) (Check all that apply) Con itional se: For �" �," � ® Variation(s): To g p Zonin Ma Amendment: Rezone From To El Zoning Text Amendment: Section(s) El Other: IV. Applicant (all correspondence will be sent to the applicant) Name: Corporation: VV Address: City, State, ZIP Code:i � dada mx Phone. Vv� Email . Interest in Property: (e.g. owner, buyer, developer„ lessee„ architect„ 4etc H Submission Requirements Checklist Submit one original (1) set of the information listed below: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR'SUBMISSION ITEM ��, All required items, including plans, shall be folded not to exceed 8'/" x14" in area. 1. Zoning Request Application (pages 1-2) 2. Affidavit of Ownership (page 3) b. Property address; 3. Proof of Ownership (e.g. warranty deed, etc.... ) 4. 1-1.1 .............. . . . . . . . . . . ............. .............. ................................................................ ................. ,........................ wm............ .......................... Paid receipt of the most recent tax bill e. North arrow. S. ....__..................... Document indicating intent to buy or lease r5l 6. Responses to applicable standards (pages 5-6) 7. ._. ....... _ _ Plat of Survey that accurately reflects current conditions 8. Plans (drawn to scale)® i a. Site Plan, including a zoning data box with the existing and proposed building setbacks, floor area, overall lot coverage, and parking; b. Building Elevations (existing and proposed); c. Floor Plans (existing and proposed); d. Engineering Plans; e. Landscape Plan and Tree Preservation Plan; f. Photometric Plan; g. Sign Drawings; h. Traffic Study, if required; 1. List of all current tenants and vacant space if a multi -tenant building. include square feet of each unit; and j, Other Information, as determined necessary by the Village Staff. 9. .................................... Legal Description saved as a Microsoft Word file 10. USB Flash Drive or compact disc (CD) with all items listed above 11. Application Fee(s) (page 7) IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR'SUBMISSION ❑ All required items, including plans, shall be folded not to exceed 8'/" x14" in area. All required plans/drawings shall indicate the following basic information: a. Name of development/project; ❑ b. Property address; c. Date of preparation and any subsequent revisions; d. Scale, both in numerals and graphic; and e. North arrow. Please note zoning applications will not be reviewed until all of required items have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested you schedule an appointment with the Planning Division before the application deadline so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness. 18 to Corporation: Email: In consideration of the Information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, It Is requested that approval be . rto this request.The applicant Is the owner or authorized is r :, s k. ., of the owner Mthe property.petitioner M'.the owner of propertyrl w Mount Prospect ani their agent'spermission r enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual Inspection of the subject property. hereby affirm that all Information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application Applicant:n L. r, wm. ,r t ------ -r--n,r�, m, r..rvrv�, rvrvrvrvry .,nn rrmmrrrmmmmrrrmmmm.. i igna �,. (Print or Type N ne I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application s I td aterial. Property Owner. a (Signa (Print r Type Name) w FA Affidavit of Ownership i STATE OF ILLINOIS ) oath, (print the sole owner of the property an owner of the property an authorized officer for t the property describedcommonly addressI and that such property i this t (print ) ture me this —day 19 Responses to Applicable Standards Conditional Use — Drive Thru 1. A drive thru on the property will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. A drive thru is imperative to the operation of the business on the property and will be designed with the safety of all drivers and pedestrians in mind. 2. A Drive thru will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located. The property to the immediate east also has a much larger drive thru it operates. 3. The establishment of a drive thru on the subject property will not impede the normal orderly development of the surrounding property. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities will be provided per the submitted drawings. 5. That adequate measures will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The Drive thru will be designed with a que for an adequate amount of cars so that the que will not spill out into the parking lot or the adjacent roadway. 6. The proposed development is in-line with the Villages Comprehensive Plan. 7. A drive thru will conform to the regulations of the district with approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission. Zoning Map Amendment 1. The B3 zoning uses are compatible the neighbor to the East and many other surrounding businesses. 2. The B3 zoning classification is compatible the neighbor to the East and many other surrounding businesses. 3. The Subject Property is suitable for the permitted uses under the B3 zoning classification because it is adjacent to a highly trafficked roadway and surrounded by like businesses which create synergies among tenants. 4. The plan for development of the subject property is consistent with the surrounding businesses including but not limited to the Chic-Fil-a next door. 5. The plan for development of the subject property is compatible with the fast food establishment developed directly to the east in the adjacent property. 6. The development is in line with the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. 7. The development is suitable for the permitted uses listed in the B3 zoning classification. -2 [IPU) 7 g �}\ � / �} ///\ ))) ?F c C� m Applicant's response: 1. Light and Sound disturbance to the immediate neighbors. a. Attached is the detail of the landscaping plan, as one can see we have proposed a combination of trees and large shrubs along the rear and side yard of the project (Locations directly abutting residential neighbors). GW would be willing to both increase the density of the landscaping and install specific species and maturity trees along the boarders of the property that directly abut residential properties. b. Below is the detail of the fencing that is proposed which is 6 feet high per code. If the board were to grant us a variance we would be willing to install a larger fence 8 or 10 feet in height. IINTER IOR VI 3'SE:CTION WIDTH CENTER TO CENTER I" ?. S" X 8"t NOM. PRESSURE TREATED FENCE POST CAP (TYR FASTEN TO PIDST'W ITH t ,'LENGTH GAL'JANIZED WOOD.SCRE'WS. 1" X (Y NOIMS.. PRESSURE TREATED FENCE PANEL. CAP (TYRj. FASTEN TO RA.IILS Mu'ITH 1 LENGTH I3AL'VANIZED 1N0DD. SCREWS. E' ?. C" NOV PRESSURE TREATED FENCE POST VX 6" NOM PRESSURE TREATED FENCE PICKET (T'YP.f. FASTEN) TO RAILS WITH 1 Iz" LENGTH GAL'VANIZ'ED V1twDOD SCREWS. (3) 2" X.4", FENCE FAIL V X 4'NOM. PRESSURE TREATED TRAM BOARD (TYP.j-OWNERS SIDE.. FAS:TENTORNI-S WITH 2'1," LEN NTH GALVAN I ZED WOOD SCREWS. POST FOOTWG - MIN.. 3003 PSI :'. CONCRETE; 3" SLUMP. PR VIDE 1° TAPERED TCP TO DIRECT WATER .I I AWAY FROM POST.. I I I I CCMIRACTED OR UNDI STUR':BED SUBGRADE c. The photometric plan submitted as part of the application clearly demonstrates that there will not be much light pollution from the fixtures proposed to be installed on the property. Light pollution from headlights will be blocked by all fencing and landscape screening installed at the property boarders. Also we would like to point out that the circulation of the drive thru will dictate that the majority of the time a car is in the drive through the headlights will be orientated toward Rand Road. 2. Smell and trash polluting the surrounding area a. GW will work to relocate the trash enclosure from the back corner of the property, adjacent to the residential neighbors, to the front right portion of the property closest to both the Chic- Fil-A and Rand Rd. 3. Hours of operation should be limited to avoid disturbance a. GW has discussed with the tenant and confirmed that they are willing to restrict hours of operation to 10:OOpm for the dining room 12:OOAM for the drive thru. This is constant with many of the similar businesses in the immediate area. t I TDP &" OF FOOTING FORILIED WITH CYLINDRICAL FIBER FORM I, REN10VE FORM AFTER 42° ' I I COANPILETIONd. REMAINING '. FOOTING SHALL HAVE DIRECT CONTACT'J117H U14DISTURIEED EARTH. C - COANPAGTED CA-@ BASE. DO NJT ENCASE BOTTOM OF POST IN CCN'CAETE EJ EO Y2" DI,A... I" ?. S" X 8"t NOM. PRESSURE TREATED FENCE POST CAP (TYR FASTEN TO PIDST'W ITH t ,'LENGTH GAL'JANIZED WOOD.SCRE'WS. 1" X (Y NOIMS.. PRESSURE TREATED FENCE PANEL. CAP (TYRj. FASTEN TO RA.IILS Mu'ITH 1 LENGTH I3AL'VANIZED 1N0DD. SCREWS. E' ?. C" NOV PRESSURE TREATED FENCE POST VX 6" NOM PRESSURE TREATED FENCE PICKET (T'YP.f. FASTEN) TO RAILS WITH 1 Iz" LENGTH GAL'VANIZ'ED V1twDOD SCREWS. (3) 2" X.4", FENCE FAIL V X 4'NOM. PRESSURE TREATED TRAM BOARD (TYP.j-OWNERS SIDE.. FAS:TENTORNI-S WITH 2'1," LEN NTH GALVAN I ZED WOOD SCREWS. POST FOOTWG - MIN.. 3003 PSI :'. CONCRETE; 3" SLUMP. PR VIDE 1° TAPERED TCP TO DIRECT WATER .I I AWAY FROM POST.. I I I I CCMIRACTED OR UNDI STUR':BED SUBGRADE c. The photometric plan submitted as part of the application clearly demonstrates that there will not be much light pollution from the fixtures proposed to be installed on the property. Light pollution from headlights will be blocked by all fencing and landscape screening installed at the property boarders. Also we would like to point out that the circulation of the drive thru will dictate that the majority of the time a car is in the drive through the headlights will be orientated toward Rand Road. 2. Smell and trash polluting the surrounding area a. GW will work to relocate the trash enclosure from the back corner of the property, adjacent to the residential neighbors, to the front right portion of the property closest to both the Chic- Fil-A and Rand Rd. 3. Hours of operation should be limited to avoid disturbance a. GW has discussed with the tenant and confirmed that they are willing to restrict hours of operation to 10:OOpm for the dining room 12:OOAM for the drive thru. This is constant with many of the similar businesses in the immediate area. t �LAN9!CAPE PLAN W® �LAN9!CAPE PLAN OORE o � w� EXTERIOR FINISHES LEGEND oB Al I aNLE'EIN�E EN�ACTFOREPEmE�TIRNPDFOFFEL MATERIAEZ RL-, [5 PLASTIC BDLARD OTHER �-SLP, NN mss- RVF EMEROENCI Ao_ To AC "F" uu.,m. _, r Y' .1 ER1111111 0 MAmNRANP-1 '';o a HIHa ,ve FeERauErv,WALLPANn acau[rvT ON uwuwn ioN smla- Buzqtansyra7ON�r�wnRwuNm�oN ARCHITECTS, INCD In n VESTIBULE SIDE ELEVATION BALE �'i�°B�Dc,GwEB �� ROOF & 'RIM PC RULE 4RF/ LEDU FIXTURE S PRE -FINISHED FREEZER /COOLER ,yp. 'IE11 MITI PLL 9uA CIAMN(A 1II1 0DRIVE THRU SIDE ELEVATION 6 MI TA C CONETRUITEN 11 FEE A'ITLTANCITTAI 111-IFIFID., 1,P D R00f JE IB BALL PCBEllROLE k T FRonED N,1N, PAREm _J_ FNM g"r`gIEN E 'OR UNIT TIP ) AT OFF o � w� EXTERIOR FINISHES LEGEND oB Al I aNLE'EIN�E EN�ACTFOREPEmE�TIRNPDFOFFEL MATERIAEZ RL-, [5 PLASTIC BDLARD OTHER m 12W "F" uu.,m. _, r Y' 0 MAmNRANP-1 FeERauErv,WALLPANn acau[rvT ON uwuwn ioN smla- Buzqtansyra7ON�r�wnRwuNm�oN ARCHITECTS, INCD PnRnPET NF PAN¢ sEBOR- «xlo1ns aRuo AA 2 CQRREGATED METAL PANEL (ANODIC CLEAR)IF - 111 E� ® PARAPET COP (ANODIC CLEAN M���xR��.,N��s.�a NO -E MFEE CODING (RED) -ENlsnm FREE IIR /coGER DE �,ILN. WNDNIsx "n0 -O ALOMwOM sDRErRON, mTEM PCM4 MLLL,ARmFFR/F1111A PLw PIMP N,NDLW PEX 2 PUN, (1111, INDrs EUEBILL BIC) PEF- PAN, (111m_ xENDs DARV RRmaE - comm BOA ONLA) WELL HIMANT AT nuuawc sNEZTs T;R. E1,ILAD UPDRADE 11HIFlcanoN. N- PIT. ' OF cABwET 41 T111 mS 1CRALI (.11E 111,`,11 TETOF - o_ o -ons FIFTNIFFIFTE PRIFA.E 111N V, DRawlmo RELEASE BPRImo To,o o aamNLLELRE�L SERKEEP .�I1 LINE — -- — — — ---- FOCI � ET 6��NEMCLLDR,D w o TO EL az In Q ,�P. D --TO amre� - NP T - FRI O� a �o RRcr uEuaBOHE — PmF o PARA,a�INL _ J, III Y MATCH ADEACEN,SUREAC[ ao. VED m, PIoI LRD) PRLo�E NEW BUILD SMART 55SQUARE ARp T O Ci _p A 51PB'� AT FROM cE BRILDIND 6rvpcp E0 P, NB"xN"(s EPo;� a N ,AP o.ON°ser scar suPPu� �A BLADE WALL DETAIL 'F E 1 DEFEND O RUDA e$ m a I (.1E „Etio, ;o ZFEEF BEwI DE O m Na s' -o• a B ,a CONNI 0 v 612 — PLM JDN I I I NP l � bCL RCC( LN[ - — �`— RWF LNC A' -1 RR PENWOSY earo m. mew — _ i5' -9l' CPN L AAB pA oc[, c�, C=E ACM -1 _ �9-,Li S C T.D. uu N. 6A TO PUW P[ NCY \— i%ZI4� T a WUN-IN RLLF (xl)-N RLLF (11) T6 OPENINGS 4 PFC lNSN[O FREEZER /COOLER BE 0 'xee�xnme a P w39Y L Pu.w sY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS �� �� \ _ �xm xti.ew C c rvG f .&, - ILAIY TO NGC CRGS,ARY 11CFE11 11.1 F- IF 03 REAR DRIVE THRU ELEVATION OZ REAR ELEVATION sEZ PwMDwc Dw,AOTE IIIIFR11 FOE MER GNCTRR E,EmRI� 01 FRONT ELEVATION A2.1 �7 02REAR / cRGEER MER A vmx�/'oDa Fuecsgo may 10% OF AREA OF THE BUILDING ALLOWANCE FOR SIGNAGE 1.a PATIO PLAN DETAIL SEE(05/AS2.2) O EXTERIOR POLE LIGHT DETAIL SEE (07/AS2.1) A. WEST ELEVATION RDoauc aEA¢e sDARo mKRDDDas 8'4"X3'6=30'.24SQFT NORTH ELEVATION _ TVP FOR 5 PATIO RAILING DETAIL SEE (03/AS2.2) ©SAFETY RAILING DETAIL (02/AS2.2) CODE REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO RESTAURANT W/DRIVE IN: 12 SPACES PER 1,000 SOFT OF FLOOR AREA. 8 STACKING SPACES FOR THE 1ST WINDOW &TWO STACKING EAST ELEVATION Y � �( /�7 O J \ \/ / \LVJ/ REI ESEEPRE Fit- -77, DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE FRONT & SIDE IIALE.LIP -i'—D'. /9 is i/s"nwulrvuu 10% OF AREA OF THE BUILDING ALLOWANCE FOR SIGNAGE 1.a PATIO PLAN DETAIL SEE(05/AS2.2) O EXTERIOR POLE LIGHT DETAIL SEE (07/AS2.1) PARKING AREA CALCULATION WEST ELEVATION 38'8"X17'4=675.12 675.12X.10=67.5SQFT 8'4"X3'6=30'.24SQFT NORTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION TVP FOR 5 PATIO RAILING DETAIL SEE (03/AS2.2) ©SAFETY RAILING DETAIL (02/AS2.2) CODE REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO RESTAURANT W/DRIVE IN: 12 SPACES PER 1,000 SOFT OF FLOOR AREA. 8 STACKING SPACES FOR THE 1ST WINDOW &TWO STACKING EAST ELEVATION III��� ///���III ),\/^ � �( /�7 O J \ \/ / \LVJ/ SOUTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION (AREA)1,173.63 1,173.63X.10=117.363SQFT SIDEWALK RAMP DETAIL 05/AS2.1 O MONUMENT SIGN SEE DETAIL (02/AS1.1) 7 ( ) SPACES FOR EACH ADDITIONAL WINDOW. LJ\lllyJJJ/LJ LJ^L}1 OFENCE PLAN DETAIL SEE ( 01/1_2.1) ® PRESALE BOARD DETAIL(04/AS1.1) TOTAL BUILDING AREA=2,584 SOFT/ 1,000= 2.5 2.5x12= 30 REQUIRED ARCHITECTS, INC. ®DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL SEE(01 /AS3.1MENUBOARD SEE 05/AS1.1 ) O ( ) #31 TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED B'RE sa[c TBo 9' CLEARANCE BAR SEE ( 06/AS1.1) +�— 245' fi TALL WOOD BOARD ON BOARD FENCE 2'� UEENEE0 out OF Smry :: onn nn� aAoxRE�rs wo. 9 S, . ;/ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: •p':':':': •:':':':': •:':':':':•:':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':1 .'s.'.' '.' 1ANDSN'APE•SEJBAfk llNF.'.'.'.','.'.',',','.'.',',', rr, 11 �ATSNITEI FAR IR_ ECEESM DOOR LANE PRE MENU BOARD TNIII `sE%l'l'-TE95LAN_ FOIESIRBON'TEFACEs �esey _ ���NA„AA ��2 E,�A� DNE Dm�, PER��NE, T MENU BOARD 53 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE c Tlo 40, 112 sg1<x TFr 034NBRFT OR LESS 25 AER SELF RE4nlrv0 BREANAWAI FRAME TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA -163 sgtt 41 51 OF 40 2 IMPERVIOUS2 TOTAL EA=23 533 sgft 2qft AR NOTE MONUMENT A ON VILIETE INEIIATIFI 111 15 21"1011 CONCRETE LEASE FOR REFERENCE ON I ACTUAL DES ON SPECIFICATIONS Byo THE ES NOTE M=MENTSICN - 'to CONCRETE SIB 2 x 5 06 9' CLEARANCE BAR s EXTERIOR WALL SIGN SCHEDULE 10% OF AREA OF THE BUILDING ALLOWANCE FOR SIGNAGE AREA OF THE BUILDING PROPOSED FOR SIGNAGE WEST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 38'8"X17'4=675.12 675.12X.10=67.5SQFT 8'4"X3'6=30'.24SQFT NORTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION AREAS)129.37+239.16+290.50+514.97=1,174SQ T 8'4X6'10=51'.24SQFT SIGAI 1,174X.10=117.35SQFT 5'.2X5'11.5=26'.57SQFT SIGAI EAST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 32'.5"X17'9=581.75 581'.75X.10=58.175SQFT N/A SOUTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION (AREA)1,173.63 1,173.63X.10=117.363SQFT 6'4X6'10=39.04SQFT I...BAIEVERIFIN 211S MENU BOARD PR ALE MEND B ARD UPCRADE cIassF car IN. SYSTEM _ ;.r EO BUILD 9 S, �0' , FVRN TVREEPACKACE. 101 bAV3 ` /•'/ DRAWN. RELDIE 6PRN. 2018 LANDSCAPE SETBACK LINE f " '.�..; a �` .;�ND SETBACK LINE is :g e .y uo WALK—IN"•: tl" ,920-0BU I' s a z 8 11 o< 12 IF NEW BUILD c SMART 55 -SQUARE 00- ,'.'.' 023.0 .. �..'. '•'� 1_,._0•. 1 -D" 13'-0” r .•J ,LANDSCAPE SETBA K LIN _—__-_• _ . ... _ —•', MONUMENT SIGN o,ea xuvee. ,o„ STOP BAR N o R TLJ•. RT. 12 (RAND RD) a SITE PLAN AND SIGNAGE AS1.1 '1 A SITE PLAN I REFER 10 91E FIGHTING POPPLIERO ALI PLAN PREPARED HALF ANI IN PIE TIED - �TEERAOUALA UIAI DROBLE NOT ADD WAORM FOR 1111R NITAL 11 IN I ITE I 'ITT NI MIL I �AVETHUERFDI LE -UP AND DETERIORATION LE!, DTALLIC THE ANPacR DIN TO INAERTGIs Hca ncaE IUIN WORD PP°cAeR -�LANE ARE RENT ARCHITECTS, INC. C) as PERncAT FARE Tyr—�� , ii�; , IRI aT RCRacrv,a<,�Ts � DOLE NF" N4AlNL ANI 1111 N'REPH= j A �z r ma corvcrec*e romwa oui�o� I LUNG REEA��C HER TO DETERONE IF . OIL ELSE FEE 1ALIE KLE'LOCAT CEN - 0 EXTERIOR POLE 7 BIALE„-, 1 LIGHT DETAIL �II AT 05rvSIIDEWALK RAMP DETAIL GICALE Is lAl RE RELIONA RE -1 PE RR�R �� R �� KR R -LRE . TRRTE E�E�R SE�R wT �orvcRE.E. mV IUIN WORD PP°cAeR -�LANE ARE RENT ARCHITECTS, INC. . d T ° , IRI j A �z r ma corvcrec*e romwa NCTIsni maosure�T snAu AR BE- s -c' 03 6” BOLLARD DETAIL GIGELE 111 -1 1 PICKUP �ry W N D 0 W— HIGHHE LET tiLOUTOM cryREPLY AT OL PAVEMENT MARKER DETAIL L oaaEo —IE RIIEFAIE 1111 VI � �o �Q U L �Q oy a� o �o CURB RAMP DETAIL 04 BEAT'Es rvm[ ALL mw AFT, NAT ADI THAN Eo -c APART sow PaAdEc NEA/ BUT LD SMART 55 -SQUARE TIP,(rvCLMF IHUOUS)R /1' ROOiaS STANDARD CURB DETAIL z -o � as RE=wmRarvc vA aooFE oA�E �. ("a c a.7 RT�om�cHau ALTERNATE CURB DETAIL 1 va renRws NOO ID iia' AT DIANE SITE DETAILS ao RO:FRFNC — FRE E) ALTERNATE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL 2 AS2.1 01 CONCRETE CURB DETAIL IN 2 EREEPA FINISHED CONCRETE - IROSELED EE_ "N" I DEALER "'I ETD IIMINIINE DFAI PHILIP IF , MANU � URERS A.MN— I FIT I I DINII �"IFMIEHI APPLY PER MANTACTILARS DREAMMENTLE, oNA 'STEIEPIS �EjEIIAEIEP T& 12W A, NOL �l INDIRIE 4 1IP MEIER X � LEND NIATI YHEIIE ANRIDI ARCHITECTS, INC I El ART SISE —I IFNI FEE I NFFRM��FELI I FEE 111HEI 0 PARTIAL PLAN VIEW 6 F—E �l -1 1 �TROWEL FIN15H EDGS3 TEST IINZENNE TNT' S% I ,XPA 21 - SIDEWALK FINISH DETAIL F—E I 0 PATIO RAILING DETAIL 3 FIALE I DID ILIA ALDMINIMP G PANEL SISTEM CLEAR IlAll 1111 PI IMMINT'VFISER SUPPLIER "MAPHIED ' 112 Rpt NNITAIE FFEWFLK LETEHL (TIP) 02 SAFETY I I RAILING DETAIL 0 Lu In J) < Ory '11EIT "'PE NEW BUILD SMART 55 SQUARE SITE DETAILS AS2.2 BORED PAD x CONCRETE0DEALER RCOTEIW CEMEN,CNER CP0EAR SEALER I LAID PLAIN OECD 11 11 11111 IIIA COMP 2 INRIALL LOT 10 BE 2' A- IT OF CAPMEN' I III F"A"EST IF IIET oIT VRxoowoiR sv u m uP ISNATUALL I OR Ll MAN 11 ED NESIALLABON 0PARTIAL PLAN VIEW 7 BIA. I'M-, I MENU BOARD FOUNDATION DETAIL CEEe°coaiTD� PonreBBwb IIIAXE All 1111 FAIR 11 cww,A,ION IF CLIFF FIRE 'I FT 11 IIIiA/2 olA s[a PIPE ,o swPANDOD wc ET PSA A ,o BOTTOM OF nwvaorenUa ISO —ER PIER ISLE seuc,uexl �-' IA 'Ip AUDImous AUI LLS IT ANCHIoR IIL,E / 11 A, CORAL IaV. SQ LLU o = I IV o IR IXiPR 0E,0%SLll OPE. oB— ' / ) u0 Il 11T NN I I FAIL LATE ) ws,ASIED Br ec. Rv EaucPv r VENoAR Irim 6EE neumueu) II I couceE,E P I l 1 I T ICIT11(4L seuetueu7 L ID s,R�cnreA JNDI,E"�AEF ACCORDED" ACHEDUE FOR ACRE SPI 0CANOPY FOOTING SECTION 5 BIA. E„-, I CANOPY PROTECTION BAR L L AISEE BELOW _ ALT ELEVATION III ORDER STATION CANOPY 1�L 03 BIA.,a-, ❑ ❑- - A,--- --d 11O A,T A. PVR, R, KNws D Pu-5uE BOARD By VENDOR IINT NO III CLIFF TCP 11% SLOPE TI .u,.. ,u. BS KNME -, IlI SLID ill .-.II 11 ) I_' III IT : � it ( cws;aun`ureau IF � : I IF 11 .'II. Y'. I' .0 �.II. 'll ALI 111111111L OF PRE -SELL BOARD DETAIL LJ912W ARCHITECTS, INC. PaoHE NEW BUILD c SMART55-SQUARE fL nNxrv�ry.�,ov �_---7--_--___—S BASE IF ALIO 1.1.HS TIME I COPPOET Toe r o O - nIns (MILio ANI DA,AR, [eNO FlIbEILLING (SE[ O O IXTIELECTRICAL PLAN) ------------- --- --- --- ------ - --(-- ___— __------- __ O O o O CONDFIEFFLAR I - EXTEND '- CONDUIT FOR ORDER NFRMATlON (IIILOTS Loop SEEAllEll III \ EAC[ a a� u<xia[ IE,[eIR Bono APE, AREA w U \ „recCNDOn - 5Q OLCLOCAL SHEETS FUND, —ENCURE CONDUT STUB -UPS ARE RIDE OF STEEL TUBE AND TEN AREA I PEDAL 01 CANOPY FOOTING DETAIL FFIATE.,-112-_1. S NGLE LANE DRIEVE -THRU ORDER STATION DETAILS AS3.1 PANIFNIAP, MIT, .1 rvc w/ aeE-crsT soNE na IMI EERIRnaaEIERRnaORenRRI� RA/ PPA' AUENT neee 11- ANcNm cua EasTWEo .T IA. 11 H TR —1. EOeewc P, pa REAP AT za' R.c IHRF a METAL Mwc mune JOIN SER exlO SIS 11 OenRE. - O AE envnNOs �. nw sae RNMETEEm,wc r i D—n NIN. A 4Ll Toe RAN MAT"o�ZF`lewiPvlNT`rni I'l=CEJ`or"�s�"E 11 WALL SECTION 04 emEe R,e-, R 0 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN NTEAaNE 1TRnNNIPAT H G ARCHITEI CANPOSTF MATERIAL A 11 DROP -PIN DETAIL COMPOSITE GATE 05 —LE N-, IFF AI DR—N. RE IN -if (wRN wmTH! °f �iIRAN-11 R -r IPEanxwwR MCOBBED 81 nonea11— w X-1. �Eo,nP � --------I�____---_��'------- _aR. IFA IS a , oAIN NAEN Nn�A eRIRNN'TRE�RREe ANR wsnuERRSA e --- .BFTO —R OF ACEIVER IME Renx,NA, PASEBENI .1 -N. sAnmNOsen,EEe E,Ne r T um. TR FA N�N,e ov,RER eELEVATION-ALTER L -J `L aE� I -L ----------------------L PNOJEo„rPE NATE COMPOSITE GATE SMART 03—LE 3,e_, PA�A��LAFBNE CAP PRICA�'LITNI CAP AB WT FA P TOP IATIH PA -1 INI „ ---TILIh----TILIh-,I----------------------- Poo,�.W.A„ov ��- ---LE---- LE ----------- I I----IJ----�J CJI I I Dumps[er E AS; TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS .I rOa IOa IOa IOa -ff TP -------F-, ----------- T sloN IRNuvnEll RTE PEnm s aE N BASIS OF SIC IRRNnsER) 10 'AND CONTAINER M"Ee tn'�ACONCATE 11 �R CONTAINER ILAI Rne OBTONN mI I L ----------L L - - - - - - L q ,I FF d 16 d 16 0 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN NTEAaNE 1TRnNNIPAT H G ARCHITEI CANPOSTF MATERIAL A 11 DROP -PIN DETAIL COMPOSITE GATE 05 —LE N-, IFF AI DR—N. RE IN -if (wRN wmTH! °f �iIRAN-11 R -r IPEanxwwR MCOBBED 81 nonea11— w X-1. �Eo,nP � --------I�____---_��'------- _aR. IFA IS a , oAIN NAEN Nn�A eRIRNN'TRE�RREe ANR wsnuERRSA e --- .BFTO —R OF ACEIVER IME Renx,NA, PASEBENI .1 -N. sAnmNOsen,EEe E,Ne r T um. TR FA N�N,e ov,RER eELEVATION-ALTER L -J `L aE� I -L ----------------------L PNOJEo„rPE NATE COMPOSITE GATE SMART 03—LE 3,e_, PA�A��LAFBNE CAP PRICA�'LITNI CAP AB WT FA P TOP IATIH PA -1 INI „ ---TILIh----TILIh-,I----------------------- Poo,�.W.A„ov ��- ---LE---- LE ----------- I I----IJ----�J CJI I I Dumps[er E AS; TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS KleWglyk 1 0WALL SIGN WEST ELEVATION y. UALI SERVICE THAT DOESN'T CUT CORNERS OUR RECIPE WALL SIGN NORTH ELEVATION 02 -.1-, 0 A WEST_ELEVATION Oaf EAST ELEVATION 0 A SOUTH ELEVATION cvwwa as uw�uo. C0SN1" OZ OMMUNITYTABLE ENLARGED PLAN L —LE o. PUW FREESTYLE CONDIMENT:p,E„ �'�"°E"""'�" WAREWASH 03 CORNER WALL TRIM L—--1 L— J EUUIF'MENT PLAN LJ V LJ 1 L/ ARCHITECTS, INC. O � W Q az In Q Oa� �o �o PaoIE NEW BUILD c SMART 55 -SQUARE EQUIPMENT PLAN FRZN BUN MARKET -PREF E01.1 Interior Interior FFIESFI LJIJLJ 12W ARCHITECTS, INC. P-EI NEW BUILD SMART 55SQUARE CQLQR RENDERINGS A2.1R t I WALK-IN LEGEND: LJ V H LF� V ®m m ®HROHERTY UNE ARCHITECTS. INC. ExISrASTREET.—AN X OX) EX REMoV STNEo ETOFE THE TREE IROTEITI ON FENS E � a= AEREs NHERENNATAT0 aFEN FETE 50 r ry 5 14. NT OOPO'El SEE =EXE i PLA GRADING r REN NT =za i a n� T ORHLN s E INTO SITE TREE PROTEC ION PROFENRELEE DNO PROPERTY oLl ORAT �ETREE 1 ORHLNE TWERHANGS NTOSTE TIT 3� X�4. dc_ TREE SURVEY SCALE 1 - 20 NOTE: TREES SHOWN ON PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR REFERENCE .ARCH..TEC 7I"'If::iii', II'II' .......................................... • Na r::rara a tiara. ' Q J �^` x 5 00015 KFVEN iru ('PAriAM kr ' GEnM1ameFASLA� PLA exP'e/3 V19 AND CAPP. r R 221 WFloor g. EIIlnmsre6 ph 312 467 0123 vao1E NEW BUILD c SMART 55 - SO UARE TREE SURVEY L0.0 --------------------------------------- ---- -- --------------------- ------ LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE 1 - 20 DESIGN BUILD GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTESI IINTI"T"T . ..... IANI A1TIl"lTlI 111, EALLIATI-N—F—TTAI NR Cl TR FU..IN.NC.NT,.LFELEFN.N TDR CONT11-1 11ILL 11 I—El IN TIE ITILITY1111 IIITLI�ATLIIIIHIU.LIIINIIIIIEIN IT" ",TH' "U"11NI ILAN. 1� ELFEELINNI 1 CONT���TAOLRPSRH�LTSoUPoPLDYECOMPL�E DESIGNABUIL. FRAWNGS FOR REVIEW ED I_ � TV PA,,E A I N NET I WILEXET "BE ANN IHIHNF ADDED OV ON I RING ANY MATERIALS OR COMMENCING ANY WORK SEPARATEI-Y A-1-24VO—RINGTOBESLEEVEDIN ' "N"U" 2 THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL A FPTR Ul 12�lftETE`�EIL LINES 1IFILL PE AND IONES FOR TURF ADD PItLM1ENDGESEGDN �EDETO LAVLETSEFFARATE SND`SYAP`E IDIDS IN LIN `.N�TPII I"I SIAI L FPTWET�1�,Fl 111 1, T AS AL R AN D L, �ITI� LE L�LLPIP.N�.DIIIIN�ll�ING�l�E.�T�.DI .--N—T, 'TH N THE PRO PERTY L NE E D 12�'N"'T"`LTN,_ FA.D,,FNNN.NP I ALL IN GAT ON C ONT RoL==L DES SHALL BE HUNTER RAN ARD U - =EoR`ADF`ELAEGTCCS= =O=ENT R ALLLSSCLHEDUSLEUINIDSLEEIS TFECAP 01 PLUG ILL OIENIIGI IS SOON IS LINES All INITATLEI 10 PREVENT IEVEIS IN R AT BE ER T LINE PAVEMEN TO SHALL REC E I F U LL D BILL =DMNDGFCKF RLFTHEMSEIES TH " - T. PER' "TIE A.I.�-ETHELISTIlLOOR A I ALL A FEE SS HALL V S T AN D REV EW AM L A t'-L1"E�EIPFBESIE1 P'1'%"ANPFIT NGlTA E S1111.111P IELFNA I E. -SIT 1E E EUENLl� THE I TE PR OR To ITS TT NG A A D _P I , A I Nt I 'BE NET 1,�,".11—N TRE I MAINTAIN ALL CODES RE.1 RED BY THE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IDPANSION LOOP ITEICICIINGIIN OT,C IT L HE CON T LOT US ET TESTA N SNR`G E F ORB YoMNI DAC" I -RPpERr T STo Ill. N IT 0 1 E.D� G 'IT _1 FEISHL U DES PRIOR TO THE OPERATION OFIPRINCLERHEAGS. Co NT TAL T L ZC I I ENE,,,BC CL`oR L,,TNGDAy I Ell I EITED IT IIEIATIN' REIIIE "' I UNION' THESTARTOFCONSTRUCTON COORD NATE ELECTRICAL LOONJP WTH GENERAL FI�TFE IR=NL'LLET ENLL ET ET O'N LE CONTRACTOR ELECTR C AN ADD OWN ED ,R, , I T "TEFABNO DR _GP EN.N , TEST R R LET E.1,1 PEI _ER IN, I o To N "'T o N FE TO T EST THE SYSTEM PRESSURE AT THE PO NT OF I IIIEISIL�,01.ALLE I P. VT I T "T!"EllE, EPA PER UEDT"NTI, V CONNECT ON AN D DES ON, U LD THE SYSTEMS BASED ON THAT PRESSURE _ , E R T 1A T I A A I SYST I *IT" THE ""`=N%EA-TE`" IS l,NTPLE.E'IE Y TE I RR GAT o N C 'T—ToR I HAT LC GORE NATE ITH TH E PLU MAIN G CONTRACTOR 21. ..T-FT.A E R DTN, "ER i I I , �T T.E EN. PP T.E FO I Co NNECT ON TO RR GAT o N WATER SUPPLY ' EIION SUN THE 1*NEI "E"ENTI—N. III F—P.NENI .1 TIE SYSTEM P1111 TI ' ALL E' STI NG UT L TIES - CH I E N OT I = N TH ES ELDOECTUHMEE NT I - I C IT 2 1 P_, NE AS _T D I "S.- . NEED TO BE REMOVED RELOCAT ED ANDo R ED SIT AL PIPIENT. P10111E 11— GPG 01 IONES, L jilE RUNS LE11S I —EV PIPE SIMES RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR FLA. mnw O stela. L�nm=zon ARCHITECTS. INC UJ LEGEND (/) C) LINE SHAN'T... PILE N IS PER 1.11 —A— S-11 —RE1111 U— 000000 EVERGREEN SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASSES SON U11APPE 11HEINITIN T�tl_ =NI-IGIOINIIOIEI U—Irk .Yf MULCH.3 DEPTH DER111— FFLF,SA SPR NG 1- P 11 1 11 SIGHTTI�ANGLE LT ORNAMENTAL FENCE Plant Schedule 21� I.E 11 I AN, API, 1HE.P., E I IAI 11 1—p— 1.1— 2 1 1:S 1. G11,11, L 111, 21 IIS 11 1 11 T1=11111. VLT tF Sl,l,,. 2 2 . .. ... ....... p ...... L' SC A.R M.111-1 I M,111. D- —1. 111- 112 E .. .... . I 11 TES L—N-11,� I NET U, 111111, 11 —=YC,�.t TER O—MENTAL N CIA C_PN,=�,_ G.H ONUT 111 11,111, G111, 1 11 D E�TIONSEEDMIX LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Proper WLen gthIPN.id.dLen gth Requi- I P.id.d 11 Icl -c, E -d— P -,.I, E�Sox Screening Abutling T 11 76% 'T socio oeciaaoea snreea Te solo sax ki— PI—mg A— �q,&.d P.id.d G,—- — 1 15 1. 1111EITT11E NEW BUILD SMART55 SQUARE LANDS&WPITAN L 1Y.0 - PROVIDE MIN. 6" CROWN IN PLANTER - COMPACT PLANTING MIX LAVER U NDERNEATH TREES (DENSER HATCH) OSHADE TREE PLANTING - PARKING LOT ISLAND SCALE NT S WHEN PERENNIAL AREA EQUAL E CALLED OUT AS EQUAL MX�E CONT PLANTS INTGROUPS OF 3-5 3"SHREDDED HARDWOOD PLANT SPACING MULCH LAVER. TOP OF SEE PLANT LIST MULCH SHALL BE I -INCH BELOW TOP OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT_ ./e DO NOT PLACE MULCH LETO `�+ 3 STEM OF PLANT UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE AMENDEDPLANTING SOIL SEE SPEC P CATIONS, 18" MIN. DEPTH ®GROUNDCOVER / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE NTS �r PLA NT SPADING ' .SEE PLANTING PLAN 3'SHRED DED BARK MULCHI BELOW ADJACENT PAVEMENT SOLTO CREATE FINISHED GRADE / / / ///l 3" TALL DI SH �� TREE RooT BALL SET FINISH ORIGINAL GROUND LINE OF ROOTBALL AT UNDISTURBED 18 MILAN SOILDEPTH SEESPECIFICATIONS,RO TBALNS, :INISH GRADE. SUBGRADE OVER MIN. DEPTH. INSTALL SOIL � REMOVETOP 1/3 OF BURLAP AND NYLON ROPE OVER 9"COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED �%\T��j' y' y' � SET ROOT BALLON 9" OF COMPACTED (DENSER HATCH) SUBGRADE '�`�/AMENDED PLANTING SOIL (DENSE HATCH) SHADE/ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL OSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE NTS SCALE NTS J H 0 In Lu o 0� O O CD I—EITTYIE NEW BUILD SMART 55 - SOUARE LANDSCAPE DETAI LS L2.0 T 3"SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS SEE CIVIL PLANS EOR ISLAND DIMENSIONS 3"SHREDDED BARKMULCH PAVEMENT AS SHOWN ON CIVILDRAWINGS �. \\' - USE PLANTING - PROVIDE MIN. 6" CROWN IN PLANTER - COMPACT PLANTING MIX LAVER U NDERNEATH TREES (DENSER HATCH) OSHADE TREE PLANTING - PARKING LOT ISLAND SCALE NT S WHEN PERENNIAL AREA EQUAL E CALLED OUT AS EQUAL MX�E CONT PLANTS INTGROUPS OF 3-5 3"SHREDDED HARDWOOD PLANT SPACING MULCH LAVER. TOP OF SEE PLANT LIST MULCH SHALL BE I -INCH BELOW TOP OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT_ ./e DO NOT PLACE MULCH LETO `�+ 3 STEM OF PLANT UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE AMENDEDPLANTING SOIL SEE SPEC P CATIONS, 18" MIN. DEPTH ®GROUNDCOVER / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE NTS �r PLA NT SPADING ' .SEE PLANTING PLAN 3'SHRED DED BARK MULCHI BELOW ADJACENT PAVEMENT SOLTO CREATE FINISHED GRADE / / / ///l 3" TALL DI SH �� TREE RooT BALL SET FINISH ORIGINAL GROUND LINE OF ROOTBALL AT UNDISTURBED 18 MILAN SOILDEPTH SEESPECIFICATIONS,RO TBALNS, :INISH GRADE. SUBGRADE OVER MIN. DEPTH. INSTALL SOIL � REMOVETOP 1/3 OF BURLAP AND NYLON ROPE OVER 9"COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED �%\T��j' y' y' � SET ROOT BALLON 9" OF COMPACTED (DENSER HATCH) SUBGRADE '�`�/AMENDED PLANTING SOIL (DENSE HATCH) SHADE/ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL OSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE NTS SCALE NTS J H 0 In Lu o 0� O O CD I—EITTYIE NEW BUILD SMART 55 - SOUARE LANDSCAPE DETAI LS L2.0 INTERIOR VIEW EXTERIOR VIEW l 6'SECTION �e 1"X8"X8"ROM . PRESSURE TREATED FENCE POST WIDTH CENTER TO CENTER CAP (TYP_)_ FASTEN TO POST WITH 1 �E LENGTH GALVANIZED WOOD SCREWS ARCHITECTS. INC. 1"X6"ROM .PRESSURE TREATED 1"X6"ROM .PRESSURE TREATED FENCE PANEL FENCE PANEL CAP (Ty P.). NOTCH CAP(TYPYE _)_ FASTEN TO RAILSWITH 1 - T FENCE CAP AROUND FENCE POST_ _ LENGTH GALVANIZED WOOD SCREWS_ FASTEN TO RAILS WITH 1 �" LENGTH s.�smuo GALVANIZED WOOD SCREWS. 6"X6"ROM _PRESSURE TREATED FENCE POST - -_ 1"X6" NOM_ PRESSURE TREATED FENCE PICKET 6"X6"ROM _PRESSURE (TVP_)_ FASTEN TO RAILS WITH 1 �E LENGTH TREATED FENCE POST V� 6'3" 60 GALVANIZED WOOD SCREWS_ 1---(3)2" X4 FENCE RAIL 1"X 6" NOM_ PRESSURE TREATED FENCEFICKET(TYP.). FASTENTORAILS BASEIlDL 1"X 4" NOM_ PRESSURE TREATED TRIM BOARD WITH 1 �E LENGTH GALVANIZED WOOD CREWS. (TVP)-OWNERSSIDE FASTENTORALS WITH 2l LENGTH GALVANIZED WOOD La CREWS. 2" X4 FENCE RAIL 11—DE 1-1111ATiDN TOP 8" OF FOOTING FOR M® / /' p06T FOOTING-MI8L3000 PGI I—EDTYEAC N�oeoe �U II ��/, WITH CVONORIGAL FEE FORM_ � ,II CONCRETE; 3"SLUMP. FIR 0111, \'Y� ., � { REMOVE FORM AFTER > >. TAPERED TOP TO DIRECT WATER 42 COMPLETION. REMAINING AWAY FROM POST. DaAn NcaELEASE svaNczoie \% CONTA T SHALL ITH UNDIS DIRECT EARTH. COMPACTED CA 6BOT BASE DO l \��� T/ { NOSTIN CON BOTTOM OF / COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED POST IN CONCRETE SUBGRADE J EO EO DIA. L Q OWOOD FENCE - TYPICAL PANEL DETAIL U)Q ALE NTS O �o �o 1111EITTYIE NEW BUILD SMART 55 - SQUARE LANDSCAPE DETAI LS L2.1 o. ..� o.o ..� s.o ... �.o _ .., __ ..o o.o ..o ro.a .._ ro.o 0 C Shallcross, Jason From: Sent: To: Subject: To the Village Board of Trustees, John Barca <johnbarca@yahoo.com> Tuesday, February 05, 2019 5:45 PM Shallcross, Jason Fw: Case No PZ -26-18 200 W Rand Road, 204 W Rand Rd We are residents of the Wedgwood Subdivision and have enjoyed raising our family and living in this neighborhood for the past 25 years. We frequently shop at Randhurst and support many of the local businesses in our area. We are however, opposed to the rezoning of 200 and 204 W Rand from residential to commercial to allow a fast food drive through restaurant. We understand there is a lot of retail and commercial properties in our surrounding areas, but encroaching into our residential neighborhood will just add additional traffic and have a negative impact on home values. We would like 200 and 204 W Rand to remain residential or they should be the types of businesses that will not bring noise, cut through traffic, late hours, and trash. Here are some additional concerns: • Our subdivision does not have sidewalks, the additional cut through traffic will add to an already unsafe conditions for children playing, walking dogs, and just walking in our neighborhood. • The noise, additional traffic, and having commercial property next to our homes will have a negative impact on the home values for those that border this property and the other homes in our subdivision. • Rezoning residential lots in our neighborhood will encourage additional commercial developments which will have a negative impact on our homes. • This area already has numerous restaurants and fast food establishments without having to add another one that will negatively impact the nearby residents. We are asking the Village Board to please reject this proposal. There are other areas to place this type of business and there is better use for these properties without negatively impacting our neighborhood and home values. Respectfully John Barca LuAnn Barca 105 West Stratford PL Mount Prospect IL, 60056 847-818-1490 Scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. January 7, 2019 DE: RE -ZONING OF 200 W AND 204 W RAND RD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 To Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Sir, Madam, We are writing this letter/petition to express our strong objection and request the REJECTION of petitioner's request to have lots 200 W and 204 W Rand Rd re -zoned from residential (RX) to commercial (133) with drive-through establishment. Below are just a few reasons as to why we object and request the rejection of the proposed re -zoning. 1. Safety of our children has been further compromised because of new businesses that had already opened along Rand rd (Chick Fil-A and other businesses nearby). • Drivers from Rand Rd cut thru our neighborhood with a speed of at least 40 mph disobeying traffic signs (stop signs, no thru traffic, children at play sign etc...). o There are NO sidewalks in our neighborhood, forcing the kids in the area to ride bikes, walk, skate etc on the street. A few years ago, to the neighborhood's dismay, the village REMOVED stop signs in the area making if MORE dangerous for the kids to be on the street and promoting thru traffic. • The cars cutting thru our neighborhood daily, have become extremely dangerous to the safety of our children who play outside, ride bikes, scooters, walk to and from the school bus stops etc. o Video has been captured and provided as evidence over the years and NOTHING has been done to improve the situation. o Pass thru traffic has increased since McDonalds moved, Chick fill a, Crunch fitness and Potbelly's moved in. • This has been reported to the MP Police but not much has been done to address it. 2. NOISE and disturbances. Below are some examples from Chick Fil-A next door • Constant noise from delivery trucks in the 3:00-4:00 AM • Alarms going off for hours in the middle of the night • Constant noise at 5:00-5:30 AM from garbage trucks every Monday and Wednesday • Speed bumps being installed at 12:00 AM • Power washing of parking lot and sidewalks at 7:00 AM on Sundays • People yelling and arguing at odd hours • Smell of grease in the neighborhood • People hanging out in other empty lots further North on Rand road (at the corner of Wedgewood and Rand) 3. Littering from Chick Fil-A and McDonalds • Littering all over Wedgewood subdivision. We constantly find bags with leftover food, food wrappers and drink cups all over our yards and subdivision streets. This is not only making our neighborhood look trashy, but it attracts rats, squirrels, racoons, skunks etc. that are also potential carriers of infectious diseases. o These smaller animals have attracted coyotes endangering our domestic pets. o There is NO animal control in Mount Prospect so calls of animal problems have NO resolution for homeowners. 4. The proposed re -zoning will have negative impact on our property and property values. • The proposal has nothing noted for a drainage plan. The village should be MORE than aware that this neighborhood has SIGNIGICANT drainage challenges o Paving over 2 residential lots 100% will have a major impact to drainage and increase water run off. o Will the village be installing curb and sewer and enlarging the drains in the neighborhood to offset this? • There was a Wendy's just South of 83 on Rand Road that was unsuccessful. What business and economic conditions have changed that would prevent this from occurring again and leaving a scarred double lot empty for the tax payers? o Let's not forget that, Coal Oven Pizza, Pei Wei, Firehouse subs, 2 Subways and Trucco's are further eateries in the close proximity that have all have been unsuccessful leaving empty building. Further illustrating saturation of area. o What is the plan to support the current business and economic conditions for the eateries that are still trying to either establish themselves (Macalister's) or stay open? There is neither need nor economic support for another establishment. 5. Fast-food/Restaurant (Wendy's) proposal negative impact and why I do not want it in our backyard • Constant smells from grease and the garbage in the dumpsters located butting up to neighborhood lots. • Rodent increased population in the neighborhood. • Noise and disturbances from traffic and people. • Garbage and delivery trucks that arrive outside of normal 8 — 5 business hours. • Customers exiting the establishment will inevitably prefer to turn right on to Rand Road and subsequently cut through our neighborhood via Wedgewood Lane creating a higher volume hazardous traffic in our neighborhood. o What happens if a child is hit? Will the village own that responsibility? 6. Alternative solutions exist —they should be considered and preferred • Alternatives, already zoned as commercial property are available and exist with the same area of consumer attraction and MUST be considered first. o Firestone, another unsuccessful business has left open property with connectivity to the Chick fil a stop light for safety and PLENTY of room for a drive through eatery. o American Mattress, another unsuccessful business has left plenty of room for another eatery should Rand road be more attractive than 83. o Any open space in the Randhurst village. We all would like to continue to live in a clean, quiet, safe and well-maintained neighborhood and we OBJECT the proposed re -zoning. We anticipate that the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Village Board will respect its residents and take our strong objection seriously and REJECT the re zoning proposal. Sincerely, Amy Davis From: A7,d,y,,,,l7ay,,,us To: S. I.)g V,c,m®ss Jason Subject: RE -ZONING OF 200 W AND 204 W RAND RD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Date: Monday, January 07, 2019 5:47:04 PM Dear Sir, Madam, As a resident of the Wedgewood neighborhood I am deeply concerned about the prospective re -zoning of 200 and 204 W Rand Rd. As it stands I am OPPOSSED to this development. My main concerns are: More cut through traffic coming from the proposed site through the neighborhood. The residents of this neighborhood live on an island surrounded by three major thoroughfares, Rand, Elmhurst and Euclid. The cut -through traffic is already bad on Wedgewood Lane. Our streets don't have sidewalks or curbs. If we or our kids our going to walk or bike anywhere it has to be done on a street which is already very narrow for 2 -way traffic. You can often tell who is cutting through by their excessive speed and disregard for residents. More congestion at the Elmhurst Rd, Kensington, Rand intersection. I recently attended an open house at the Community Room at Village Hall hosted by Patrick Engineering, the firm hired by the village to perform a traffic study for the Rand corridor. I learned from their research as well as from MP residents about how difficult it already is to navigate that area on foot, bike or car. And how residents in the surrounding area are affected by this intersection. It is very dangerous to walk through that intersection, it is very confusing and time consuming (I was told by one of the reps that this intersection has the longest time cycle in the state. 7 minutes to complete a cycle!) I believe that very few people will use the main roads to get back to either Elmhurst or Euclid after exiting the drive thru and will use our neighborhood as a cut thru. I don't believe that anyone exiting the drive thru will take a left down Rand but will be forced to go right due to competing traffic from Chick-fil-a and Potbelly's. This stretch of road on Rand between Euclid and Elmhurst is also very dark and confusing, competing left turn lanes into Fresh Tyme, Starbucks, Mcdonalds, Potbelly and Chick-fil-a are already very dangerous. It's a bad stretch of road. I think more planning, research and solutions need to be implemented to Rand before we continue to flood the area with more traffic. Think about it, if traffic in this area gets much worse, people will begin to avoid it altogether. I think that rezoning from residential to commercial is a very slippery slope that can lead to more of this if not checked. It seems like the plan is to eventually rezone this entire stretch of Rand. I think this would be a mistake and would not help with alleviating the traffic problems along the Rand corridor. There are three other vacant properties in the area (the old Goodyear, Mattress firm and Shell gas station) that are already zoned for business, I think it makes better sense to develop these areas as opposed to rezoning residential properties to commercial. There are also numerous vacant properties in Randhurst Village. Nobody is asking for another fast food restaurant in the area. Within 1/4 mile there is Steak and Shake, Mcdonalds, Five Guys, Chipotle, Potbelly, Chick-fil-a, Naf Naf, Panera, Mod pizza, Jersey Mike's etc... I understand the need for more tax revenue but at what cost? This is already an obscene concentration of fast food restaurants. This request appears like it has been rushed through. The first time anyone in the neighborhood had heard anything about this was two weeks ago, over Christmas week. Very few of the residents in the neighborhood were notified of the proposal and public hearing on Jan 10. The other residents were only notified from the few that were sent letters about the proposal. It does not appear that any other public meetings were completed nor was there any traffic or drainage study done to date. To conclude, I hope that the Planning and Zoning Committee carefully takes into consideration all of the concerns to the residents of Wedgewood Terrace. Sincerely, Andrew Davis Scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. ,January 6, 2019 DE: RE -ZONING OF 200 W AND 204 W RAND RD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 To Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Sir, Madam, We are writing this letter/petition to express our A=g,c .p , is n and 1equest the REJEcTiON of petitioner's request to have lots 200 W and 204 W Rand Rd re -zoned from residential (RX) to commercial (B3) with drive-through establishment, Below are just a Jcw reasons as to why we object and request the rejection of the proposed re -zoning. 1. Safety of our children has been further compromised because of new businesses that had already opened along Rand rd (Chick Fit -A and other businesses nearby). • Drivers from Rand Rd cut thru our neighborhood with a speed of at least 40 mph disobeying traffic signs (stop signs, no thru traffic, children at play sign etc...). o There are NO sidewalks in our neighborhood, forcing the kids in the area to ride bikes, walk, skate etc on the street. A few years ago, to the neighborhood's dismay, the village REMOVED stop signs in the area making if MORE dangerous for the kids to be on the street and promoting thru traffic. • The cars cutting thru our neighborhood daily, have become extremely dangerous to the safety of our children who play outside, ride bikes, scooters, walk to and from the school bus stops etc. * Video has been captured and provided as evidence over the years and NOTHING has been done to improve the situation. * Pass thru traffic has increased since McDonalds moved, Chick fil a, Crunch fitness and Potbelly's moved in. e This has been reported to the MP Police but not much has been done to address it. 2. NOISE and disturbances. Below are some examples from Chick Fil- A next door • Constant noise from delivery trucks in the 3:00-4:00 AM • Alarms going off for hours in the middle of the night • Constant noise at 5:00-5:30 AM from garbage trucks every Monday and Wednesday • Speed bumps being installed at 12:00 AM • Power washing of parking lot and sidewalks at 7:00 AM on Sundays • People yelling and arguing at odd hours • Smell of grease in the neighborhood • People hanging out in other empty lots further North on Rand road (at the corner of Wedgewood and Rand) 3. Littering from Chick Fill -A and McDonalds • Littering all over Wedgewood subdivision. We constantly find bags with leftover food, food wrappers and drink cups all over our yards and subdivision streets. This is not only making our neighborhood look trashy, but it attracts rats, squirrels, racoons, skunks etc. that are also potential carriers of infectious diseases. * These smaller animals have attracted coyotes endangering our domestic pets. * There is NO animal control in Mount Prospect so calls of animal problems have NO resolution for homeowners. 4. The proposed re -zoning will have negative impact on our property and property values. • The proposal has nothing noted for a drainage plan. The village should be MORE than aware that this neighborhood has SIGNIGICANT drainage challenges. • Paving over 2 residential lots 100% will have a major impact to drainage and increase water run off. • Will the village be installing curb and sewer and enlarging the drains in the neighborhood to offset this? There was a Wendy's just South of 83 on Rand Road that was unsuccessful. What business and economic conditions have changed that would prevent this from occurring again and leaving a scarred double lot empty for the tax payers? o Let's not forget that, Coal Oven Pizza, Pei Wei, Firehouse subs, 2 Subways and Trucco's are further eateries in the close proximity that have all have been unsuccessful leaving empty building. Further illustrating saturation of area, What is the plan to support the current business and economic conditions for the eateries that are still trying to either establish themselves (Macalister's) or stay open'? ']'here is neither need nor economic support for another establishment, 5, Fast-food/Restaurant (Wendy's,) proposal negative impact and why I or not want it in our backyard • Constant smells from grease and the garbage in the durripsters located butting, up to neighborhood 'lots. • Rodent increased I)OPUlation in the neighborhood, • Noise and disturbances from traffic and people, • Garbage and delivery trucks that arrive outside of normal 8 -- 5 business hours, • Customers exiting the establishment will inevitably prefer to turn right on to Rand Road and subsequently cut through our neighborhood via Wedgewood 1 -ane creating a higher volume hazardous traffic in our neighborhood. What happens if child is hit? Will the village own that responsibility? 6. Alternative solutions exist — they should be considered and preferred Alternatives, already zoned as commercial property are available and exist with the same area of consumer attraction and MUSTbe considered first. Firestone, another unsuccessful business has left open property with connectivity to the Chick fit a stop light for safety and PLENTY of room for a drive through eatery. American. Mattress, another unsuccessful business has left plenty of room for another eatery should Rand road be more ,attractive than 83. o Any open space in the Randhurst village. We all would like to continue to live in a clean, quiet, safe and well- maintained neighborhood and we OBJECT the proposed re -zoning. We anticipate that the Planning & Zoning Commission and the Village Board will respect its residents and take our strong objection seriously and RE"JECTthe re zoning proposal, Shallcross, Jason From: Gina Faso <gmfaso@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2019 9:06 PM To: Shallcross, Jason; Juracek, Arlene; Hoefert, Paul; Hatzis, Eleni; Rogers, Richard; Saccotelli, Colleen; Zadel, Michael; Grossi, William Subject: RE -ZONING OF 200 W AND 204 W RAND RD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Distinguished board members, I am writing this letter to express my strong objection and request the REJECTION of petitioner's request to have lots 200 W and 204 W Rand Rd re -zoned from residential (RX) to commercial (133) with drive-through establishment. I was not provided notice of the hearing by the village as 3 of my neighbors were, apparently being a block away it was not deemed necessary. However, through neighbors and the public hearing sign, the posted plan, administrative content, Staff Report and Survey I was able to educate myself on the topic. I find it rather disappointing that in the Staff Report it indicates only 2 objection letters were received. If you only notify 3 neighbors, as per polling the neighborhood and received 2 objections, that is 67% objection rate and should be taken seriously or use a larger sample by notifying more of the neighborhood. Please allow me to formally, in writing add my objection to the re -zoning proposal. Below are just a few reasons as to why I object and expect the rejection of the proposed re -zoning. 1. Safety of our children has been further compromised because of new businesses that had already opened along Rand rd (Chick Fil-A and other businesses nearby). Despite what might be believed, drivers from Rand Rd cut thru our neighborhood with a speed of at least 40 mph disobeying traffic signs (stop signs, no thru traffic, children at play sign etc...). We have had many close calls with children, my children. There are NO sidewalks in our neighborhood, forcing the kids in the area to ride bikes, walk, skate etc on the street. A few years ago, to the neighborhood's dismay, the village REMOVED stop signs in the area making if MORE dangerous for the kids to be on the street and promoting thru traffic. Video has been captured, complaints issued over the years and NOTHING has been done to improve the situation. I will note that for 3 days last year there was a officer that IN PLAIN SIGHT sat near the corner. Pass thru traffic has increased since McDonalds moved, Chick fil a, Crunch fitness and Potbelly's moved in. My lawn at the corner of Wedgewood and Meadow Lane is constantly driven over there are divots and they are always filled with water. I have given up filling them with dirt and trying to grow grass. 2. Littering from Chick Fil-A, Potbelly, Starbucks and McDonalds. Littering all over Wedgewood subdivision. I am constantly finding bags with leftover food, food wrappers and drink cups all over my yard and subdivision streets. This is not only makes our neighborhood look trashy, but it attracts rats, squirrels, raccoons, skunks etc. that are also potential carriers of infectious diseases. o These smaller animals have attracted coyotes endangering our domestic pets. o There is NO animal control in Mount Prospect so calls of animal problems have NO resolution for homeowners. 3. The proposed re -zoning will have negative impact on our property. The proposal has nothing noted for a drainage plan. The village should be MORE than aware that this neighborhood has SIGNIFICANT drainage challenges. Paving over 2 residential lots 100% will have a major impact to drainage and increase water run off. Will the village be installing curb and sewer and enlarging the drains in the neighborhood to offset this? • There was a Wendy's just South of 83 on Rand Road that was unsuccessful. What business and economic conditions have changed that would prevent this from occurring again and leaving a scarred double lot empty for the tax payers? Let's not forget that, Coal Oven Pizza, Pei Wei, Firehouse subs, 2 Subways and Trucco's are further eateries in the close proximity that have all have been unsuccessful leaving empty building. Further illustrating saturation of area. What is the plan to support the current business and economic conditions for the eateries that are still trying to either establish themselves (Macalister's) or stay open? There is neither need nor economic support for another establishment. 4. Viable alternative solutions exist — they should be considered and preferred. Should the zoning committee not get involved in the lack of economic support for another eatery, alternatives, already zoned as commercial property, SITTING EMPTY are available and exist with the same area of consumer attraction and MUST be considered first. Firestone, another unsuccessful business has left open property with connectivity to the Chick fil a stop light for safety and PLENTY of room for a drive through eatery. American Mattress, another unsuccessful business has left plenty of room for another eatery should Rand road be more attractive than 83. Any open space in the Randhurst village. I would like to continue to live in a SAFE, clean, quiet, DRY and well-maintained neighborhood and OBJECT the proposed re -zoning. Sincerely, Gina Faso 1100 N Meadow Lane Scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. Mount Prospect Planning & Zoning Commission Attention: Joseph P. Donnelly 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 mmvw��=! It has come to my attention that there is a proposal to change the zoning from RX Single Family Residence District to B3 Community Shopping District and a conditional use for a drive-through establishment for the properties located at 200 and 204 West Rand Road. That is simply unacceptable. I am a resident and live at 1114 N. Meadow Lane. Due to the triangular nature of our neighborhood, being that it is surrounded by (3) main streets (Elmhurst Road, Euclid and Rand Road) cars race through our neighborhood to avoid waiting at the traffic lights, This happens throughout the day, all day, every day, It has increased significantly since the addition of Chick Filet and Pot Bellys. I have 2 children and there are +/- 30 other children in this neighborhood under the age of 14, By adding another business, it will only increase the flow of traffic through our streets endangering any kid that may be out playing or simply riding their bike. Another issue is the noise. You want to put a drive through in our back yard? Would you like that in your back yard? Just imagine hearing......" I'll have two cheese burgers, a fry and a milk shake" every time you try and entertain some guests on your patio. What about delivery trucks, clumpsters being picked up, oil being collected...... beep, beep, beep, beep ...... at all hours of the night? How about the smell? Would you like to smell french fry oil and grilled hamburger meat all day, every day? How about the appearance? Would you like to step out on your back porch, see a line of cars and a commercial structure steering you right in the face? How about some nice parking lot lights shinning through your bedroom window at all hours of the night? amvur�-Ml the ground on their way out? How about the garbage that will inevitably blow into your yard, Nothing quite like picking up cheese burger wrappers lodged in your fence. How about the depreciation of your property value? Do you think my neighbors planned to livA behind a Wendy's fast food chain when they made a decision on the biggest investment of thei life? What will that do to the resale valueof their home? Now, add to that a rapidly increasing I real estate tax bila l, crumbling pvement on le d our streets, no sidewalks, terribrainage issues a the most dilapidated neighborhood park in all of Mount Prospect, I I think I am painting a very accurate picture here. If there was a proposed Wendy's attempting to go up right in your back yard, you know what your answer would be. It would be HELL NO! You know it, I know it and anyone you ask will agree that the answer is a resounding no. There is enough fast food in this area to feed a small country. We don't want it and we definitely don't need it. This is a "residential neighborhood ....... not a "business district"! That is why we "live" here, Thank you for your time, Please feel free to reach out to me if you should require any further clarification on my stance. I am readily available. Sincerely,__ Bill Pappas Cell # 847-401-4569 Email Address: bill.,) iF qg!gt)a I , net 1114 North Meadow Lane Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Thursday, January 10, 2019 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., there will be a public hearing at the Mount Prospect Village Hall, 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL, concerning the following: PZ -26-18 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 200 W Rand Road, 204 W. Rand Road PIN#: 03-27-307-007-0000, 03-27-307-006-0000 PETITIONER: GW Properties 2211 N. Elston Ave. Suite 304 Chicago, IL 60614 OWNER: Benjamin Figueroa 204 W. Rand Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 NATURE OF REQUEST: Petitioner is seeking a zoning map amendment from RX Single I Family Residence District to B3 Community Shopping District "lop '-'11str esR 1 and a conditional use to allow for a 've- ou establishment and other relief from the Village of ount Prospect Village Code Family may be required for this project. L-- I This is not a "notice to appear". It is an invitation to all interested persons to submit oral or written comments concerning the above case to the Planning & Zoning Commission at 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, U, 60056 or via e-mail jshallcross@,rnountprospect.org. Persons having questions may call the Community Development Department of Mount Prospect at (847) 818-5328. The Planning & Zoning Commission will make a recommendation based on the information discussed at the meeting; the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Dated at Mount Prospect, Illinois, this Wednesday, December 26, 2018. Joseph P. Donnelly Chair-Derson, PI K-""F'LkNTk-W# & Zc'nmg COMW&Z 2018URPETZ-26-18 200 &- 204 W. Rand Road (ZdJA & C-M,docx p,,.. , L .,. P t6 Lu W � f S kpYV. fi� j S � Y; c7Lyr CC b b �'• / 1 � �� ` ,4 Vii. ..P r 6 yr f:. r ', --- _ ..: ------------- RT, 12 (RAND RD) ..::::, .......A Ift, A Zm� 204 W Rand Road from residential (RX) to commeticial(W) with drl ve thru. Here. are a few reasons for my objection. 1. Safety will be compromised by the Increased trafrtc of cars driving thru the neighborhood. * children playing, elderly walking, pot owners walking dogs also Increased transient traffic 2. Noise & Disturbances Delivery trucks, Alarms, Garbage trucks, Power washing of the lot, People yeffing and arguing, Loud music from cars, January 7, 2019 To whom it may concern, I am writing this letter as a realtor and homeowner in this neighborhood for the past 19 years I am wanting to address the petitioner for the properties located at 2010-204 W. Rand road. "The proposal being a fast food restaurant, and in my experience, once you introduce this nature of business, others tend to follow. Along with the business comes the problems that arise from the stench, noise, debris, and animals such as: increaseK mice, rats, raccoon, skunk, possum. Introducing a restaurant into a residentialir 1 zoned community would brin down the value of the residmid0immm.; although the property taxes would remain the same. The residents of this community are having to deal with 3 fast food establishments on the block as well as the overflow from Randhurst Village. I believe that every homeowner has the right to have peaceful enjoyment of their properties, but with a new restaurant, that would no longer be the case. 'The residents would have to deal with all the above mentioned problems not to mention: bright lights, transients and additional traffic which could lead to drive thru customers using the sidestreets behind the proposed site to get back to Elmhurst or Euclid. This also presents safety issues for chilldren playing or people walking their dogs 'They would not be able to enjoy the quiet of a back yard because of the trucks, fumes, noise, the ordering at the drive thru, bright lights, and the hungry animals mentioned above walking in Out of the thier yards. I would ask you: Does the neighborhood need another burger joint? We have a total of 21 eating places between Kensington and Euclid, from Rand Road to Randhurst Village, Nine of those places offer Burgers! Also, iwould ask: would you like to live in a home facing or near the proposed site? I would think not, and I would ask that you respect the rights of the residents of the Wedgewood Subdivision and not allow a change in the zoning. Cordi Angel1 Qr`a America Realty Network 21 N. Broadway Des Plaines, IL 60016 224.6591000 11' N. Meadow �l1` +�11 Joseph P. Donnelly VAMIal 1 S. EmersonStreet Mount Prospect, 1160056 'w 11 W. Rand Road, 204r Road. Hearing Date: M 2019 I My family and I live directly behind the subject properties. We have a very strong objection in changing zoning of these single family residences to commercial property. When case PZ -1 3-11 for Chick fil-A was heard, I and numerous neighbors of mine filed a written petition to deny the relief requested. I personally appeared at meeting on July 28, 2011 with copy of the petition and voiced our objections. All our objections were overruled and requested relieft were granted to Chick fil-A. Thereafter my family r I have been suffering from tremendousr r big delivery trucks in middle of night several times a week. Also often someone opens wrong door of Chick fil-A and loud alarm goes on for a lengthy period of time and disturbs our sleep in middle of night. Additionally Chick fil-Ns trash such as paper cups, sandwich boxes, food etc. come to my own yard and I end up cleaning their mess in my property. 200-204 W Rand road properties are in back of my house and I do not suffer from additional nuisance like I have been suffering from my neighbor Chick fit -A from side of my house. By the way there are several vacant commercial properties nearby. In short I urge you to please pay attention to the concerns of the residents and do not allow the zoning change of these properfies. We, the citizens, pay very high taxes and deserve to have clean area and peace around our ! To Whom it May Concern, I area writing this letter as a local Realtor in the area for over the past 25+ years. Regarding the petitioner's request to have lots 200 & 204 W. Rand' Rd. re -zoned from residential to commercial with drive through establishments and the negative impact it will have on property values, particularly to the neighborhood on the east. When you start putting fast food restaurants in a particular area, they have a propensity to multiply and this is surely the case in the area of 200 & 204 W. Rand Rd, There will undoubtedly be more litter on the proposed site every morning and very likely through the day. People Diving near by will be subjected to offensive, smells and fumes if they have the misfortune to be downwind of the site. The neighbors will be subjected to additional noise — cars starting and stopping, car doors banging, shOUting, will be especially irritating late at night. Never ending, nuisance of late-night hours. Leaving the neighbors in the area with few controls over things like hours, noise levels, and security concerns. Ask yourself would! you like to view the back of a fast-food drive through from you home? The noise of the traffic and all the litter that blows into your yard? There are already dozens, of places to buy burgers etc., we don't need another one,, The area is becoming a fast-food wasteland and will in my opinion have, a negative impact on property values to the residential homes to the east, Respectfully, Victoria Lunger Century 21 Langos & Christian 701 W, Golf Rd, Mt. Prospect FVLTMTZMI- UZI= elm Signature m Al J,4 top" /]�I,/ wIit C 2 ' )k 3 LA Lq lb) 17 vi, 7, CAI, /jj /Vio C) Kj 91 10, '4 PW 12 WV04 OL) 111P\ 13 P 14 15 v�', 4 16 17 Jell e c 4 2 ex, el 9 20 3k 21 1""j, ckc 22 23 24 J.......... 0 Afe .111.e Ol 'All C-11 1, z PON a A) &jl Petition signatures„ Page 2 Name Address, Signature �i�t„ Cute OHIq n u�� 0 ,co✓� o „r,�"` IIIIYO % J�fd% e 1 % � i ✓� / �y l I °:. 31 t�)6)�b o p°t IF b 32 1 roe, 433 a M h January 10, 2019 DE: RE -ZONING OF 200 W AND 204 W RAND RD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Case: PZ -26-18 To,: Planning and Zoning Commission Dear Sir, Mada,mi, We are writing this letter/petition to express our strong objection and request the REJECTION of petitioner's request to have lots 200 W and 204 W Rand Rd re -zoned from residential (RX) to commercial, (133) with drive-through establishment, or ANY Commercial (131-85). 1. SAFETY of our children has been compromised because of new businesses that had already opened along congested Rand rd (Chick Fil-A and other businesses nearby). There are currently 25-30 CHILDREN in W'edgewood subdivision. • Drivers from Rand Rd race thru our neighborhood as a short cut to Euclid Ave and Urnhurst Rd, with a speed of >40 mph disobeying ANY traffic signs (stop signs, no thru traffic, children at play sign etc...). o There are NO, sidewalks in our neighborhood, forcing the kids in the area to ride bikes, walk, skate etc on the street. A few years ago, to: the neighborhood's dismay, the villlage REMOVED stop signs in the area making It even MORE dangerous for the kids, to, be, on the street and promoting thru traffic. • The DAILY TRAFFIC FLOW in our neighborhood, has becorne extremely dangerous to the safety of our children and all residents. * Video has been captured and provided as evidence over the years and NOTHING has been done to improve the situation. In fact, it has gotten WORSE. * Pass thru traffic has increased since Chickfil A opened, McDonalds, Crunch fitness and Potbelly's moved in. 0 This has been reported to the MP Police but not much has been done to address it. 2. NOISE and disturbanicesi. Below are some examples from Chick Fil-A next door to illustrate ongoing issues currently affecting our COMFORT AND GENERAL WELFARE. • Constant noise from delivery trucks in the 3:00-4:00 AM, • Alarms going off for hours in the middle of the night. • Noise at 5:�00-5:30 AM frorn garbage trucks every Monday and Wednesday. • Speed bumps being installed at 12:00 AM, • Power washing of sidewalks at 7:00 AM on Sundays, • People yelling and arguing at odd hours. • Smell of grease and trash in the neighborhood. • People hanging out and littering in other empty lots further North on Rand road (at the cornier of Wedg,ewood and Rand), 3. Littering from Chick Fil-A and McDonalds currently detrimental to PUBLIC HEALTH and CURB APPEAL of our neighborhood LITTERING all over our Wedgewood subdivision has become a major problem. We constantly find and P,ICK UP bags with leftover food, sandwich wrappers, drink cups which are scattered all over our yards and streets. This is not only making our neighborhood look TRASHY, but it attracts RODENTS (rats, squirrels, racoons, skunks etc) which are potential carriers of infectious diseases (big public health issue). * These smaller animals have also attracted coyotes leading to endangering of our domestic pets, * Please KEEP IN MIND, that there is NO animal control in:, Mount Prospect, so any calls for animal problems have NO resolution for homeowners. 4. The proposed re-zonin;g will have NEGATIVE impact on our property values (supporting letter from 2 local realtors are being presented). The proposed commercial re -zoning, will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of our properties and will impair property values within the neighborhood. Another KEY issue to note is the lack of current and adequate drainage in the need hood; The proposal has nothing noted for a drainage plan. The village should be MORE than aware that our neighborhood has SIGNIFICANT drainage challenges, * Therefore, 100% paving over 2 residential' lots will have a MAJOR impact ON drainage and increase water runoff. * Will the village be installing curb and sewer and enlarging the drains in the neighborhood to offset this? Just as a reminder, there was a Wendy"s just South of 83 on Rand Road that was unsuccessful and closed a few years ago. What business and economic conditions have changed that would prevent this from occurring again and leaving a scarred double lot empty for the tax payers? cLet's also not forget that, Coal Oven Pizza, Pei Wei, Firehouse subs, 2 Subways and Trucco's are further eateries in the PROXIMITY that have all been unsuccessful leaving empty buildings. These examples c) What is the plan to support the current business and economic conditions for the eateries that are still trying to either, establish themselves (examiple: Macalister's deli) or stay open? There is neither the need, nor economic support for another establishment/fast food eateries, S-ZAr .tr welfare, impaired property vailues and why we strongly OPPOSE • Constant smells from, GREASE and GARBAGE in the clumpsters BACKING to Our lots • Noise and disturbances from DRIVE-THRU traffic and people SHOUTING TO PLACE THEIR ORDERS, • Garbage and delivery trucks that arrive Outside of normal 8, — 5 business hours. • Headlights from DRIVE THRU CARS shining AT OUR BEDROOM WINDOWS every evening, 365 days a year. • STRANGERS fron'i Wendy's cutting on foot thru our, properties further compromising our safety, • Due to already congested traffic on Rand rd/Elrnhurst rd/Kensington intersection, customers exiting Wendy's will inevitably prefer to turn right on to Rand Rd (making Ieft on Rand rd is close to impossible) and Will Cut through our neighborhood via Wedgewood Ln creating a higher volume hazardous traffic ENDANGERING OUR CHILDREN/RESIDENTS (big SAFETY issue). o What happens if a child is hit? Will the village own that responsibility? Trash will be blown away in our` yards, Curb appeal will be ruined and wi I I no longer be able to enjoy our properties for which pay dearly. We all know how high real estate taxes have become. Increased population of RODENTS in the neighborhood, attracts coyotes which on the other hand endanger Our domestic pets. a None of the above will be mitigated by the proposed 6' ft wooden fence! Given the examples above, we are asking you, would YOU like to have Wendy's (or any other commercial B3 zoned establishment) in your back yard or in your RESIDENTIAL neighborhood? We don't need another fast food restaurant! What we need is more PARKS and conirnunity GARDENS to help offset the dan,iage we ar°e doing to the environment (refer to recent Village Surveys), RESIDENTIAL LOTS 0 Strategic alternatives, already zoned as COMMERCIAL properties are available and exist within the sarne area of consumer attraction and MUST be considered first. o Firestone, another unsuccessful business has left open property with connectivity to Chick fiI A, a traffic light for SAFETY, lessened IMPACT on TRAFFIC CONGESTION and PLENTY of room for a drive through eatery. c) American Mattress (on the corner of Kensington and Rand), another unsuccessful business has left plenty of room for another eatery should Rand road be more attractive than B. o How about any open spaces in the Randli,u!rst village? How about any other commercial lot in Mount Prospect? In conclusion, we all would like to continue to live in a SAFE, CLEAN, QUIET and well-maintained neighborhood with rising/arid not declining property values and we strongly OBJECT and OPPOSE the proposed residential to commercial re- zoning, Let's also not forget that in 2008 Mount Prospect was named "THE BEST PLACE TO RAISE YOUR, CHILDREN"! Let's preserve this reputation by not allowing fast food eateries to take over our residential neighborhoods! We anticipate that the Planning & Zoning Cornmission and the Village Board will respect its residents and take our strong objections seriously and REJECT the re zoning proposal. Sincerely, Wedgewood subdivision See signed petition for signatures (one per household/address). .1� um ROTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Thursday, January 10, 2019 at the hour of 7:�00 p.m., there will be a public hearing at the Mount Prospect Village Hall, 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IT-, concerning the following: CASE NO. COMMONLY KNOWN AS: PIN#: PETITIONER: MT t -M TIN 4 03-27-307-007-0000, 03-27-30:7-006-0000 Chicago, IL 60614 OWNER: Benjamin Figueroa 204 W, Rand Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 NATURE OF REQUEST: Petitioner is seeking a zoning map amendment from RX Single fWww ily Residence District to B3 Community Shoppi District and a conditional use to allow for a c lishment y�e-ou Fe—st—Ml and other relieif from the Village of Mount Prospect Village Code as may, be required for this project, I This w. a notice to appear". It is an invitation to all interested persons to submit oral or written comments concerning the above case tothe Planning & Zonint.g Commission at 50 S, Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, 11, 60056 or via e-mail jshalleross@,mountprospect.org. Persons having questions may call the Community Development Department of Mount Prospect at (847) 818-532K The Planning & Zoning Commission will, make a recommendation based on the information discussed at the meeting; the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Dated at Mount Prospect, Illinois, this Wednesday, December 26, 2018. Joseph P, Donnelly LL? Lys,= H -"A"1 -*&Z-4 C0&W&Z2019UA?AWP2,2&182W4 2(4W,PavdRasd(MiA&CU).d�x Ik ►2► ►• AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 200 AND 204 W. RAND ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT. ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Jon Silverberg of GW Properties ("Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Conditional Use permit for the property located at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road ("Property") and legally described as follows: LOTS 6 AND 7 IN BLOCK 5 IN WEDGEWOOD TERRACE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST'/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS Property Index Number(s) 03-27-307-007-0000 and 03-27-307-006-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use permit to operate a drive-through establishment for property located at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Conditional Use permit being the subject of PZ - 26 -18 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 10th day of January, 2019, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Daily Herald Newspaper on the 26th day of December, 2018 and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees der4y44g th;erienying j�le request being the subject of PZ -26-18; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that it meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use permit would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth are incorporated as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use permit for a drive-through establishment at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. "Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan and elevations prepared by MRV Architects, Inc.; 2. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village codes and regulations; 3. Submittal of an irrigation and photometric plan that comply with Village Code requirements; 4. All exterior lighting shall be full cutoff and pointed straight down; 5. All rooftop units shall be screened from the public right-of-way and property line of all adjacent residentially zoned property; and 6. An administrative plat of resubdivision shall be recorded with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds before a Certificate of Occupancy may be issued." and SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. Page 2/2 PZ- 26-18, 64 -e4.. --CG .20 0.._gr.d.....2 01:...V.v..:.....11::�..and....1::Z.d.....,. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of February, 2019. Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: Karen M. Agoranos Village Clerk .6 ►2► ►• AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 200 AND 204 W. RAND ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Jon Silverberg of GW Properties ("Petitioner"), has filed an application to rezone certain property located at 200 and 204 W. Rand Road ("Property",) and legally described as follows: LOTS 6 AND 7 IN BLOCK 5 IN WEDGEWOOD TERRACE, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST'/4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS Property Index No. 03-27--307-007-0000; and 03-27-307-006-000 WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested 200 and 204 W. Rand Road be rezoned from RX Single Family Residence to B3 Community Shopping; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for rezoning being the subject of PZ -26-18, before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 10th day of January, 2019 pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Daily Herald Newspaper on the 26th day of December, 2018; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2019, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of the map amendment set forth below to the Mayor and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of PZ -26-18 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Official Zoning Map of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by reclassifying the Property being the subject of this ordinance from RX Single -Family Residence to B3 Community Shopping; and SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT PASSED and APPROVED this day of February, 2019 ATTEST: Karen M. Agoranos Village Clerk Arlene A. Juracek Mayor