HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.6 Motion to accept proposal for Booster Station 5BoardDocs® Pro
Agenda Item Details
Meeting
Category
Subject
Access
Type
Preferred Date
Absolute Date
Fiscal Impact
Dollar Amount
Budgeted
Budget Source
Recommended Action
Public Content
Information
Page I of 3
5.6 Motion to accept proposal for Booster Station 5 East 1 MG Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
Design and Construction Engineering Services in an amount not to exceed $41,736.
Action (Consent)
Feb 05, 2019
Feb 05, 2019
Yes
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Accept the proposal for Booster Pumping Station 5 East 1MG Water Storage Tank Rehabilitatio
Project Design and Construction Engineering Services as submitted by Burns & McDonnell
Engineering of Downers Grove, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $41,736. 1
As part of routine preventive maintenance efforts, the east 1,000,000 -gallon steel ground -water storage tank (5E) at Booster
Pumping Station 5 (112 E. Highland Avenue) was inspected in 2017. The inspection found that the tank needs rehabilitation.
Specific items recommended include partial interior rafter replacement, blasting and re -coating of the tank interior; spot repair
and topcoat of the tank exterior; as well as replacement of ladders, manholes and railing to comply with current OSHA
regulations.
The engineering work necessary to prosecute this project consists of the preparation of bid documents, bid phase services, and
construction management and inspection. Staff asked four (4) area firms that perform this type of work to submit proposals tit,
assist the Village with design, bid phase services and on-site construction observation.
Reguest for Proposals (RFEII
To design these improvements, staff require technical assistance from a qualified civil engineering consultant. Accordingly, staff
prepared a detailed request for proposals (RFP) necessary to solicit these services. A copy of this RFP is enclosed. Consulting
engineers were asked to submit a technical proposal detailing the firm"s background, key personnel, and approach to the
project. In addition, each firm was also asked to submit a separate cost proposal indicating work effort anticipated and a not -
to -exceed fee. The required scope of work included review of the 2017 inspection report; preparation of plans and bid
documents; and obtaining all necessary regulatory permits. RFPs were distributed to (4) engineering firms with expertise in the
rehabilitation of water storage reservoirs.
Uff-T-TRM
Three (3) technical proposals and three (3) cost proposals were received. Each proposal was evaluated based on thit
background of the firm, related project experience, proposed services and scope of work, schedule work effort and proposal
content. Each firm received a point ranking (total points = 100) for each criterion. The table below summarized this analysis:
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/5/2019
BoardDocs® Pro
Technical Proposals
Category
Max. Points
Burns & McDonnell
Tank Industry Consultants
Dixon Engineering
Background
20
18
17
18
Experience
20
17
18
19
Scope
25
23
20
18
Schedule
15
11
10
8
Work effort
10
8
8
8
Content
10
9
8
8
Tota Is:
100
86
81
79
Each firm was asked to submit a cost proposal as well. The table below summarizes staff"s analysis of costs.
Cost Proposals
Firm
Hours Total Cost
Cost / Hour
Burns & McDonnell
253 $37,942
$149
Dixon Engineering
397 $46,414
$116
Tank Industries Consultants
815 $90,057
$110
mail
Page 2 of 3
The technical proposals indicated all participating firms were qualified to perform the work. All the firms had adequatc
experience and appropriately trained staff to design and implement a successful reservoir rehabilitation project.
The highest rated firm was Burns & McDonnell Engineering of Downers Grove, Illinois. The Burns & McDonnell proposal provide
numerous examples of successful reservoir and tank rehabilitation projects similar in scale and scope as the proposed wor
Examples cited included a Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency (NSMJAWA) standpipe rehabilitation pr•je
and an elevated tank rehabilitation project in Rantoul. All references checks indicated Burns & McDonnell performed well.
copy of Burns & McDonnell"s technical proposal is enclosed. I
In addition, Burns & McDonnell has successfully completed several relevant engineering projects for the Village including
rehabilitation of water storage tank 5 North, development of a water rate study, sanitary sewer flow monitoring, storm sewer
smoke testing, and several water main replacement projects. All of their work has been satisfactory.
The lowest cost proposal was submitted by Burns & McDonnell. A copy of their cost proposal is enclosed. It is the opinion of
staff that Burns & McDonnell has allocated sufficient work effort (253 hours) to successfully prosecute this project.
Staff recommends including a 10% contingency in the award for this proposed contract due to the fact that time spent on
construction engineering and inspection can vary due to circumstances beyond the engineering consultant"s control. For
example, contractor delays, material availability and inclement weather are all parameters that can lengthen anticipated
construction time.
It is the staff opinion that Burns & McDonnell understands the proposed project, has prepared a thorough proposal based on
extensive experience, and is well qualified to perform the work.
1. Accept proposal for Booster Pumping Station 5 East 1 MG Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation Design and
Construction Engineering Services.
2. Action at discretion of Village Board.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal for Booster Pumping Station 5 East 1MG Water Storage Tank
Rehabilitation Project Design and Construction Engineering Services as submitted by Burns & McDonnell Engineering of
Downers Grove, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $41,736.
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/5/2019
BoardDocs® Pro
B
I -a �r
-iaNHtati&r-i of t[ -ie 1,000,000 GaII&r-i Stati&r-i 5E GroLj�r-id St&rage' -ik.Ipdf (2,137 KB) McD Rro�posaI f&r R,e[
I
1- F.10R, PFZOPOSAL.S.�pdf (89 KB) -ocati&r'i Ma�p (3).�pdf (1,41.8 KB) IZEQUES
B
I -a �r-i
aNHtati&r-i of t[-ie 1,000,000 GaII&r-i Stati&r-i 5E GroLjir-iS
d t&rage' k.Ipdf (1 .1. 2 KB) McD Cost Rro�posaI f&r R,e[-i
-i of t[ -ie IJA GaII&r-i SteeI GroLj�r-id St&rate' -i �k - -ik Lr-idUst�ry.�pdf (1.91999 KB)
9-1.3-201.7 U�pdate EvaILiati&r
L—J
Administrative Content
Executive Content
Page 3 of 3
All items under Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Village Board and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of those items unless a Board member or member from the audience so requests, in which the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its sequence on the agenda.
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/5/2019
i
a,
UM�NLMWK�M
UM�NLMWK�M
1%
BURNS MCDONNELL.
January 21, 2019
Casey Botterman, Water/Sewer Superintendent
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 W. Central Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
IY'1 IRirolposaI for IIEii inigiineeirling ServiU-161114161111tatloin of the 1,000,000 Gall1loin Statloin ME
GiirMliinid Storage ra114lk
Dear Mr. Botterman:
Maintaining water infrastructure in an fiscally responsible way can be a challenge for municipalities
like the Village of Mount Prospect (Village). Meeting this challenge requires a strong partner that
understands the goal of rehabilitating the 1,000,000 gallon Station 5E ground storage tank.
Burns & McDonnell understands the objectives for this project and is qualified to provide the design
and construction services outlined in the December 27, 2018, request for proposals. We bring the
following advantages to the Village:
Provein 11 irack lZecord of Delliveriiing ProJectsto,the Vill1lage Burns & McDonnell brings a unique
perspective given our track record of delivering successful projects to the Village. For over a decade,
we have worked with you to plan, design and construct improvements to your water system. We
understand Village standard contract documents and construction details. Most recently, we provided
this scope of work for you for the rehabilitation of the Station 5N ground storage tank. Our project
team's experience helped the project stay on track when issues were discovered with the existing roof
supports. We quickly made changes to the design, addressing the issues while remaining within the
Village's budget. Our familiarity makes us a reliable partner.
thnique in Il ofthie Vill1lage's Water Systern Burns & McDonnell has a long history supporting the
Village with planning, designing and constructing improvements to the Village's water system. With our
experience at Tank 5N, having provided various repairs and re -coating of the tank, we know the issues
that are most important to you, like managing cost and delivering well coordinated projects.
Experienice withi K)esigiin & Coiinistiiructiioiini,roiir,t�lhie Vill1lage Our core design team has experience providing
design and construction phase services successfully for the Village. Randy Patchett, Joe Darlington
and Steve Crede provided services to the Village for the Isabella Drainage Improvements project and
the Maple Evergreen Water Main Improvements project, which included piping modifications and a
connection to the Village's elevated tank. These projects were delivered on schedule and within budget.
Enclosed, please find our submittal in response to your request for proposals. Feel free to contact me
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ZY
Randall L. Patchett, PE I Water & Municipal Services Manager
630-724-3276 1 rpatchettCq)burnsmcd.com
143I Opus Place, Suite 400 Downer's Grove, IL 60515
0 630-724-3200 burnsmcdcorn
41.Company profile
7 Project approach & methodology
10 Scope of services
13 Project team
Organz:atlira 4y chart
t
ReSUrnes
5 Summary of east experience
1 Present ent rk Iload
Cost proposal (sepairate einnall a't'tadhinneiln't)
Co
A Ur r i5& M[[)Dnnel[DUr engineers,
[Dn5�.rU[�.iDn pP]fe55iDn@l5' 5[ien�.i5�.5 and
[Dn5Ud�.@n�.5 do more �.h@n simply plan,
design and [Dn5�.rU[L \AM.h@ Dli55iDn
Um[h@nged5in[e 1898--�.omake DUr
[lien�.55U[[e55fUd --DUrDlDPe �.h@n 6'000
professionals p@[�rerVVi�.h yDU �.o �.@ke
on �he �.DUghe5�.challenges, [Dn5�.@nHy
working �.D make �.heVVDrld an even more
@Dl@Zing place.
�oca! IlPresence & 111..)epth olf StMfllf
Based in Kansas City, Missouri, Burna& McDonnell
has more than 50 offices nationwide, allowing us
to provide innovative' timely and coat -effective
service toclients. With over 6'000emp|oyee-
ovvnera' Burna& McDonnell has professionals
with extensive experience in a wide range of
engineering, construction and environmental
Locally, Burna& McDonnell has been providing
water services to municipal clients in northeastern
Illinois for over 20years. VVehave local offices
located in Downers Grove and the City ofChicago
with a combined staff ofover 330 professionals. We
anticipate that all ofthe services in the December
2720lO'request for proposal will beprovided by
staff located inour Downers Grove office. VVewill
call upon national experience aarequired.
Our Downers Grove office location:
Burna& McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.
1431 Opus Place, Suite 400
Downers Grove' Illinois 60515
Corporate Structure & Services
VVeprovide comprehensive services that cover the
full life cycle of project' finding coat -effective
solutions tomeet your specific needs. Our services
cover all markets in the engineering and
construction sectors to bring you and your projects
seamless breadth and depth ofknowledge and
� Environmental
Institutional
� Construction
o� Manufacturing &
� Aviation
Industrial
� Governmental, Military
0| & Gas
& Municipal
Power
11ndustry IR"ankings& IR"ecognitions
Burna& McDonnell has reputation for providing
quality service and innovative solutions to
clients. Engineering News-Pecord(£JVP)ranks
Burns & McDonnell in the top 2 percent of the
leading 500USdesign firms and the top one-third
of the leading program management firma' design -
build firma' construction management -for -fee firms
and construction management-at-riakfirms.
lin 2018,£WR M0dwaest inammed Elunris & McDoirnn6UU
No 1 DesUginenmf the Also in2CO8,2Oofour
specific industry services earned spots inthe top 30
intheir field inENPs industry -specific rankings.
�����N�� Burna& McDonneUhas eamed
u��u�om�
acknowledgment that caUaa�ention
toourinduatry|eaderehipand�
� NN�
g
atabi|itgrowthand|ow turnover,
experience and financial strength.
W(..-.? have appeared oin F�bmftll'10
COMP8N|[S U��mm
mm�����'���������pairUes
TO WORK FOR' to Work F:�onUUst fmnsUx coinsecufUv(..-.?
1--- 20l? ' yeans,nairflkUing No 50 for 2018
1 For the seventh consecutive
year, the Professional Services
Management Journal (PSMJ)has
P/��o�Saasa�nAWA It - presented Burns & McDonnell
with the Premier Award for Client Satisfaction
for receiving award-winning ratings in key client
service categories. PSMJ the leading publisher,
trainer and consultancy tothe A/E/Cindustry,
annually conducts anindependent survey of
A/E/Cservice provider clients todetermine overall
satisfaction levels in seven categories: helpfulness,
responsiveness, quality, accuracy, schedule
adherence, budget adherence and scope and fees.
Commitment to Quality
Delivering quality
work iaacornerstone
of our firm. Backing
the skills, knowledge
and experience of
our professionals is
our robust Quality N��N
Assurance/Quality
Contro|(QA/QC)
Program.
Providing the framework
toconfirm our project
excellence, our QA/QC Program includes check
and balances based onlessons learned throughout
ormore than llO-yearhistory and the experience
ofour emp|oyee-ovvnera. We perform risk reviews
to identify, assess and develop plans to mitigate
risks and create project instructions, which include
scope and responsibilities, schedule and budgets
and project -specific requirements. VVebuild six -
step internal quality reviews into project schedules
that involve regular coordination meetings and
evaluations byexperienced professionals atstrategic
milestones throughout the design and construction
processes.
Commitment 'to 'the
Village olf Mlouin't IlProspect
Our mission is "to make our clients aucceaafu|"
'
and weaccomplish this bydeveloping long-term
relationships based upon mutual respect, technical
competence and responsiveness. Burna& McDonnell
ial000emp|oyee-owned'and our clients tell uathey
see our pride ofownership inour work. Over q00
ofour work iarepeat business with existing clients,
which demonstrates their level of satisfaction with
our services.
Burna& McDonnell has been successfully providing
consulting, design and construction services to
the Village for l5years. Our proposed staff are
experienced inworking with the Village onsimilar
projects. VVekeep projects onbudget and on
schedule while maintaining effective communication.
VVepride ourselves onbeing qualified and
responsive. VVevalue our partnership and look
forward tocontinuing toserve the Village ofMount
Prospect.
E 'PI
Project approach &
ethodology.
Background
The south 1,000,000 -gallon steel ground water
storage tank at the Village of Mount Prospect
Booster Pumping Station 5E was inspected by others
in 2013 and again in 2017. The inspections found
that the tank needs rehabilitation. Specific items
recommended in the most recent inspection include
blasting & recoating of the tank interior; spot repair
and topcoat of the tank exterior; and replacement of
ladders, manholes and railings to comply with current
OSHA regulations. In addition, the 2017 Report
indicated that the existing electrical equipment in the
valve vault may be missing a ground fault interrupt
circuit, that the foundation may have excessive
cracking and spalling, and that the existing cathodic
protection system may no longer be properly
functioning.
The Rehabilitation of the 1,000,000 Gallon Station
5E Ground Storage Tank project consists of the
preparation of bid documents, bid phase services,
and construction management & inspection for the
Village -owned water storage tank at the Booster
Pumping Station 5E, located at 112 E. Highland Street
in Mount Prospect.
F)roject Approach
We intend to deliver a successful project by
providing proactive project management and
coordination with the Village to confirm the Village's
objectives can be met, project costs are minimized
and an efficient plan to complete the project has
been developed. Our dear, coindise coiiriiriiiriiriuiirillicaIlii oiiri
*1]1l intiirllbute to the ddlllveiiry of t[ is Iproject in
budget aind oin sdlheddle wfflle lirinpacts
to the IlpdlM�lc Effective Communication is critical to
the public and Village Administration's perception of
the project.
Resolution of Key Considerations
The successful design and construction of the
Project will present some unique considerations.
The following paragraphs identify and discuss key
considerations for completing the project as well as
how the Burns & McDonnell team intends to manage
and resolve these considerations.
BURNS S
,\ZMSDONNELL' 0
Cost Burns & McDonnell recently supported the
Village with development of a Water Main Asset
Management Program and Water Rate Study,
so we understand that this project is the start of
many projects the Village will be completing in the
upcoming years. IMainagiing cost us Ikey to nnakiirq;
suire the ViUlage caro innpllenneint their piro5.,;irann
the way li't was liinteinded. Simple design decisions
like coating type and methodology (e.g. overcoat
vs. full blast & recoat) can have a drastic effect on
cost. The Village needs an opportunity to consider
these issues to make data -driven decisions. We
will identify feasible options, discuss them with the
Village, then design and bid the project in a manner
that allows for bid alternatives. This will allow the
Village to obtain competitive pricing and decide
what to do based on actual installed costs.
1--leavy Metall Abatement & Disposall The 2017
inspection report identified the potential presence
of lead in the exterior and interior coating systems.
Appropriate disposal of lead-based paint can add
cost to the project. We will complete additional
testing of the existing coating systems to verify
the potential for the presence of heavy metals.
The project specifications will include measures
for proper verification and disposal of heavy metal
based paints. Burns & McDonnell has over 60
environmental staff located in our Downers Grove
office that can assist the Village, if needed.
o� Peiirmftbiiing The proposed improvements will require
obtaining a construction permit from IEPA. We have
an excellent relationship with IEPA and are confident
that this will result in a timely permit review and
issuance.
o� Roof Support Structure The 2017 Report indicated
that the existing roof support structure was starting
to show signs of corrosion but did not contain any
recommendations for addressing this issue. With
the recent completion of Tank 5N, it was found
that once the interior blasting of the roof support
structure was completed that the corrosion was
much more extensive than the inspection had
indicated. It is highly likely that the same situation
will be discovered on Tank 5E. Burns & McDonnell
will include provisions in the contract documents to
address this potential concern which will protect the
Village from costly extras being discovered during
construction.
BURNS S
,\ZMSDONNELL' 0
IzTsrel relYmmkol E03EM
111..)esign 1......ngineering & Bid F)hase
Services
Task 1., Project Coordination
11 Kickoff Meefling Coordinate and conduct
a project kickoff meeting to introduce key
project team members, review the scope of
work, Village Budget, objectives, information
and coordination that will be required.
1.2 Pur o,lie ct Ila inageirineint Complete project
management and administration tasks.
13 Desllgin IRevliiew Meefling Conduct one project
status meeting with the Village to review the
design package.
Task 2: Preliminary Design
21 IEAstling Da to IReViiew Request and review
existing data pertinent to the project. This
is anticipated to include as -built drawings
provided by the Village and the 2013 and
2017 inspection reports, as well as the request
for proposal for the replacement of the roof
stiffener across the roof center hub from 2014.
2.2 i:::`lii6ll Illinvestiiigafloin Identify existing conditions.
2.3 Coafling adlheslloin a in IIW eavy urul et6ll testling
Complete testing to confirm existing
conditions.
Task 3. Final Design
Coinstiructioin �.3�ld Docuirineints Prepare specifications
for bidding. Prepare and submit a final EOPCC.
Submit up to three (3) hard copies to the Village.
Documents will conform to Village, IEPA and
Standard Specifications for Water & Sewer Main
Construction in Illinois requirements. Effort to make
bid documents compliant with third -party financial
aid requirements is not included.
Task 4: Permitting Support
Prepare and submit a construction permit
application to IEPA. Permit application fees are not
included in this proposal.
Task 5: Bid Phase Support
o. IPirovlide 113id Documents Electronic copies of the
final issued for bid documents will be made available
to prospective bidders in PDF format for a nominal
fee. Bidders will be able to purchase hard copies of
the documents at printing cost.
o. Atteind aind Coordinate Oine (1) Pire 13ieefling
Prepare meeting agenda and meeting notes.
o� IPirovlide 113iing Assistaince Review bidder
questions and requests for clarification, respond
to questions in writing and prepare addenda as
ENNINEM
Attend aind Coordinate Oise (I) 113id Operfling.
113id �-Zeview aind lr'�ecoi�)nu�)nei�'idati'oi�'i Review and
evaluate bids for completeness, develop and review
bid tabulation, verify contractor representations,
check references and make a written
recommendation for contract award.
AssendUle Construction Cointract Documents for
execution of the awarded contract.
ConsII IMlnageurnent & Inspection
Task 1: Project Coordination
o� IPireeou^ structioin Conference Coordinate, attend
and conduct one Preconstruction conference
with representatives of the Village, contractor(s),
utilities and other interested parties affected by the
proposed construction. Prepare meeting agenda
and meeting notes.
Piroject IMainagenneint Complete project
management and administration tasks.
Task 2: Resident Engineering & Inspection
o� IPireeou^ structioin li:)1,ioto5,;rap1'is Prior to the start of
construction, make a digital photographic survey
of the targeted work zone(s) to document existing
N
BURNS,\ZMSDONNELL' 0
Subnnitt6l�-Zeview Review Contractor's schedule
of values, work schedule, shop drawings and other
equipment/material submittals as may be required
by the contract documents.
Piroiect
• Assist the Owner in preparation of any necessary
change order and/or field directives.
• Process monthly applications for payment
submitted by the Contractor(s), and forward to
Owner with recommendations for approval and
payment.
• Assist the Owner with the resolution of inquiries,
complaints, or concerns raised by residents or the
public.
o��-Zeslideint EingiineeiHinj,.; Provide a Resident Project
Representative (RPR) for part-time observation
of the work during the construction period to
observe and record construction progress under
the general guidance of the Engineer. Based on on-
site observation, the Engineer will keep the Owner
informed of the progress of the work, shall endeavor
to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies
in the work of the Contractors and may disapprove
or reject work as failing to conform to the contract
documents. Other tasks include:
Prepare written inspection reports when on-
site. Reports are to be delivered to Owner
in an electronic format. Digital photographs
documenting work tasks in progress as well as any
potential problems or unusual conditions shall also
be included with each report.
Complete site visits to inspect Contractor's work
and confirm it complies with the specifications.
Site visits will occur at the following key
milestones in the project.
Task 3., Project Closeout
o� IPuindh 11 Ii'st Perform a field observation of all
completed work before a final application for
BURNS S
,\ZMSDONNELL' 0
payment is processed for the Contractor. Prepare
punch list, and complete a field visit to confirm items
have been addressed.
Coinfoirn6iing to Construction Documents Revise
the original plans in accordance with construction
observation records of the Resident Engineer,
Inspectors, and the Contractor, and supply the
Owner with one set of as -built drawings in a suitable
electronic format.
Project tea
Every Irineirurnlbeir of �:Iuiirins & McDoirnn6l]'s Iproject
tearin has exteinsil ive expeiineince deslgirfling aind
instar thin water storage to inks througfiout the
Ridwest for iiriiriuiiriilicilillpalllilitilies aind Ilpiirllivate sector
dllleints Eadh Irineirurnlbeir of our Iproject tearin IIWv,a s
expeiirlleince woiirkling oin successfWl IproJects that
aire silirn!Aaiir to the IRe[41M]iItafloin of the 1,000,000
G,61]oin Station 5E Grouind Storage project
(Project), iiindludiiia g the urecentllly coirnp�leted
Re[41MAiItafloin of the 1 RIAIlIoin G,61]oin Station SN
Grouind Storage proJect Our tearlin offers the
fol11o*ling v6lues�::
o� Employee -owners willing to go the extra mile
o� An enthusiastic and innovative spirit
o� Proven track record with the Village
o� Proven record of serving as problem solvers rather
than propagators
o� 100% Commitment to the success of the Village
F:::burs Iii III Iii ariii ty witiIII III age & this IlProject
The ideal key personnel for this project should have
experience completing similar projects, experience
with the Village and a strong understanding of
the Village's procedures, interaction with project
stakeholders and design and construction related
requirements. Our proposed project team has that
experience and knowledge. W(..-.? a ills II ave as Illoing
[flstory supportling the Vl]]age With ev6luaIlii oirl
Some of the advantages the Burns & McDonnell
project team offers include:
o� Key members of our project team have a strong,
professional working relationship with the Village.
Randy Patchett, PE our proposed project manager.
Joe Darlington, PE our proposed design manager
and Steve Crede our proposed construction
manager have successfully provided planning,
design and construction services to the Village on
multiple projects.
Our key personnel have reviewed available
information and have a strong understanding of
the project requirements. Some of our experience
working on the Village's water system includes:
• We have successfully completed tank projects
for the Village. Randy Patchett and Joe
Darlington were both part of our design team
for piping modifications to the Village's elevated
water storage tank and Steve Crede was the
Construction Manager for the construction of
this connection. We understand Village standard
contract documents and construction details.
• Randy Patchett was part of our team that
supported the Village by developing the 2017
Water and Sewer Rate Study. That study proposed
utility rates to adequately and equitably recover
costs for the Village's water and sewer utilities.
This project was included in the rate study, so we
know the Village's budget expectations and the
need to the get most of their money.
learn Strength
A team organizational chart is provided on page 14.
The brief bias of key members provided below list
proposed roles and the value each will provide to
this project.
Project Manager
Raindy Patdlhett, PE will serve as the project
manager for this project. Randy has over 30 years of
experience managing municipal projects. Randy is
well versed in the design of water storage tanks. He
will be responsible for project coordination, project
scheduling, budget maintenance, project design,
overall performance and most importantly, client
satisfaction. Randy has experience in completing
multiple projects for the Village of Mount Prospect.
BURNS S
,\ZMSDONNELL' 0
Design
,Joe Daiir�IUingtoin,PEwill serve aathe assistant project
manager onthe project and aathe lead designer. Joe
will work directly under Randy and coordinate daily
design activities. He has extensive experience with
the Village and astrong understanding ofVillage
requirements. Joe will be supported byM�att DuirUop.
Steve Cnedewill serve aaour quality manager
during the design phase. He is familiar with Village
requirements and preferences and is highly qualified
tocomplete conatructabi|ityreviews because of
his over lqyears ofexperience indesigning and
constructing water storage tanks. Steve lbiir�lings a
cmintnactmn's perspective tmounteammaindUs Ikey to
ounpnovein tnackmecomd of d6UUvenUing pnoliectsewUth
mmUirUmm6U dhainge ondens.
Steve Cnedewill serve aaour construction
manager. In this role he will represent the Village by
coordinating with the contractor including attending
progress meetings. Hewill coordinate closely
with Matt to make sure the project is constructed
smoothly. Steve has over lqyears ofexperience
in designing and constructing water storage
tanks. Steve has aproven track record providing
construction service tothe Village; successful
projects include the 20l3StormvvaterImprovements
project, the 20l5Isabella Drainage Improvements
project, the 20l5Maple Street & Evergreen Avenue
Water Main Improvements project, standby
generator installations at Booster Pump Stations #ll
& #l7and the Rehabilitation ofthe lMillion Gallon
Station 5E Ground Storage Tank.
M�att Duirflopwill serve aaour resident project
representative. Matt has over 4years ofexperience
in constructing water storage tank projects, aawell
aaconstruction experience with the Village. Matt
was aninspector for the 20l5Isabella Drainage
Improvements project. Herecently has been
providing construction services fora one -million
gallon potable water elevated storage tank and a
five -hundred thousand gallon potable water elevated
storage tank inthe Village ofRantoul. Prior tothat
he was providing construction services for the
rehabilitation ofa5-MGstandpipe owned bythe
Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water
Agency.
Support Staff
The project team presented in this section will be
supported byover 40civil, structural, electrical and
mechanical engineers and technicians and over 20
construction personnel as needed for successful
completion ofthe project. All ofthe primary support
staff are located in our Downers Grove office.
OrgaKilzatilona! Chart
F.��..irns & Md )onnell has assembled is cj�..ialified, experienced and knowledgeable
projecC Gear C.o provide professional services C.o fhe Village of ProspecC for
�.he mmmmZehabiR.afJon of.he 1,000,000 ( '..'allon S�.a�.Jon C:.'ro�..md S�.orage lank projecL
We are confidenY . �.he Ceam will deliver a projecC on sched.fle and wi.hin lo�..idgeL An
organiza�.J(: nal charf is provided below and de�.ailed res. ..imes of :.:..��..irns & Md )onnell
personnel follow phis page.
Mklkllage o1lIMlouIIn't IlProspect
IN 1 ma ME
Randy Patchett, PE
Joe Darlington, PE Steve Crede
Matt Dunlop Matt Dunlop
BURNS &MSDONNE LL' 0
Eduicatilairi
o� BS, Civil Engineering
Reg 11stirat 11 a@is
o� Professional Engineer (IL)
�
33
Randy Patchett, years ��xProject Manager experience
Randy Patchett manages the water and municipal services practice
for Burns & McDonnell's Chicago regional office. Heiaasenior civil
engineer with extensive experience providing consulting engineering
services oncivil, environmental and hazardous waste projects to
municipal, industrial, state and federal clients. Randy's responsibilities
include developing and managing projects involving awide range
of services in the areas of water, wastewater, atormvvaterand flood
management, hazardous/mixed waste management and general civil
works. His experience includes performing investigations, feasibility
studies, computer modeling, global information system projects, master
planning, design and construction management.
Station 5114 Ground Storage 1"ank 11�:Z`ehabilitatlion U
Village olf IlYllouint F)rospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
0UUeintmmainagenfor the rehabilitation ofalmillion gallon ground
storage tank. The project included blasting and recoatingthe interior,
and spot -blasting and over -coating the exterior. Aa interior blasting
occurred' it became evident that the condition of the steel rafters was
worse than previous inspections indicated, aothe scope ofthe project
was altered to replace the steel in the worst condition. This additional
work was completed without significantly affecting the overall project
cost. Various improvements tothe tanks' safety measures were
performed aawell aadisinfection and site restoration.
Standpipe Structural & Coating 11�:Z`ehabilitatlion U
Northwest Suburban IlYlluinicipal Joint Action Water,
Agency
Greater Chicago Area, Illinois
01Ueint mmainagenfor the rehabilitation of two 5 -million gallon
standpipes owned byNSMJAVVAinthe greater Chicago area. The
standpipes provide pressure equalization and water storage for
NSMJAVVA'al00MGD transmission system which provides water to
seven Chicago -area suburbs. After being damaged aaa result ofice
build-up due tocold weather, the overflow scupper needed redesign,
and the coating systems needed tobecompletely renovated. The
project included structural repairs and coating system improvements.
Responsibilities included project management, design ofoverflow
scupper improvements, new coating system selection and developing
construction bid documents.
Campbell & IMIapIII ewood I.....11evated ["ank Structural &
Coating IR"ehabilitaIlii on 1I Village olf Ilw uil
Rantoul, Illinois
01lleint Mainager., Multiple elevated tanks provide storage in the Village
of Rantoul's water system. Among them are the 1 -million -gallon
spheroidal elevated tank at Campbell Street and the 500,000 -gallon
legged elevated tank at Maplewood Drive. The Project included blasting
and recoating of the interior and exterior of the Campbell Elevated
Tank, spot -blasting and over -coating of the interior and exterior of the
Maplewood Elevated Tank, various improvements to the Tanks' safety
measures, steel work, disinfection and site restoration.
I.....'llevated ["ank 510 Structural & Coating IR"ehabilitation
Newport Cher nical 111..)epot IIRIeuIse Authority
Newport, Indiana
01lleint Ila inager for the rehabilitation of a 100,000 -gallon elevated
tank at the Vermillion Rise Mega Park in rural Indiana. The project
included structural repairs, tank access upgrades, and coating system
improvements. Responsibilities included performing a condition
assessment of the elevated tank, oversight of subcontractors,
developing construction documents and project management during
the construction phase.
BURNS &MSDONNE LL' 0
o� BS, Civil Engineering
Reg 11stirat 11 a@-,Ils
o� Professional Engineer(|L |N)
o� OSHA lO-HRConstruction
08
Joe years of'
Design Manager experience
Joe Darlington focuses on water and wastewater projects for municipal
clients. Heiaaproject manager with experience inevaluation, design,
permitting and construction management ofwater main, force main'
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, groundwater wells, pump stations and
water and wastewater treatment plants. He strives to understand client
objectives and iapassionate about leading design teams toperform
with excellence. Hehas asuccessful track record coordinating projects
with third parties, such aaregulatory agencies, property owners,
impacted businesses and residents. His ever-growing knowledge of
civil infrastructure design and construction enable him tosuccessfully
execute projects for the mutual benefit ofclients and their communities.
Station 5114 Ground Storage 1"ank IRIehaNkllklitatlion U
V1111age o1f IlYllouint F)rospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
ProJectmmainagenfor the rehabilitation ofalmillion gallon ground
storage tank. The project included blasting and recoatingthe interior,
and spot -blasting and over -coating the exterior. Aa interior blasting
occurred' it became evident that the condition of the steel rafters was
worse than previous inspections indicated, aothe scope ofthe project
was altered to replace the steel in the worst condition. This additional
work was completed without significantly affecting the overall project
cost. Various improvements tothe tanks' safety measures were
performed aawell aadisinfection and site restoration.
Standp�lipe Struictura! & Coating IRIehaNkllklitatlion U
Northwest Suburban IlYlluiKlidlipdll Jdlint Action Water,
Agency
Greater Chicago Area, Illinois
ProJectmmainagenfor the rehabilitation ofa5MGstandpipe owned
bythe Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency
(NSMJAVVA)inthe greater Chicago area. The standpipe iaone oftwo
that provides pressure equalization and water storage for NSMJAVVA'a
100 -MGD transmission system which supplies water toseven Chicago -
area suburbs. The project included structural repairs and coating system
hicagoareaauburba.Theprojectinc|udedatructura|repairaandcoatingayatem
improvements. Responsibilities included project management, design
ofoverflow scupper improvements, new coating system selection and
developing construction bid documents
Joe Darlington,
Design Lead
Carnpbe!hll IMlap!ewood I.....JIlevated ["ank Struictura! &
Coating IR"e a liilll lii tatii III V1111age o1f IIR an'tou!
Rantoul, Illinois
Pr ,Jett Mainager., Multiple elevated tanks provide storage in the
Village of Rantoul's water system. Among them are the 1 -million -gallon
spheroidal elevated tank at Campbell Street and the 500,000 -gallon
legged elevated tank at Maplewood Drive. The Project included blasting
and recoating of the interior and exterior of the Campbell Elevated
Tank, spot -blasting and over -coating of the interior and exterior of the
Maplewood Elevated Tank, various improvements to the Tanks' safety
measures, steel work, disinfection and site restoration.
I.....'JIlevate d ["ank 510 Struictura! & Coating IRIehaNkllklitatlion
Newport Cher- 611ca! 111..)epot IIRIeuIse AuithorIity
Newport, Indiana
Pr ,Jett Ila inager for the rehabilitation of a 100,000 -gallon elevated
tank at the Vermillion Rise Mega Park in rural Indiana. The project
included structural repairs, tank access upgrades, and coating system
improvements. Responsibilities included performing a condition
assessment of the elevated tank, oversight of subcontractors,
developing construction documents and project management during
the construction phase.
BURNS &MSDONNE LL' 0
Eduicatiairi
o� BS, Civil Engineering
Reg istirat 11 a@is
o� OSHA lO-HRConstruction
o� OSHA 3O-HRConstruction
o�OSHA 4O-HRHAZVVOPER
o� Designated Erosion Control
Inspector
o� |DOTDocumentation of
Contract Quantities Certified
o� FermiLabElectrical Safety
Certified
o� FermiLabRadioactive Safety
19
St��� �
�����������xConstruction Manager experience
Steve Credeserves Burns & McDonnell aaaproject manager and
manages construction management services. Hefocuses on water,
wastewater, atormvvaterand transportation projects for municipal
clients. Steve has served as aconatruction manager and resident
engineer on numerous projects providing construction inspection,
layout and project oversight. |naddition, hehas extensive experience
in water main, storm sewer and sanitary sewer design for land
development and public works projects, using AutoCAD software.
Station 5114 Ground Storage 1"ank IRIehaNkllklitatlion U
V1111age olf IlYllouint F)rospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
Coinstnuctioinmmainagenfor the rehabilitation ofalmillion gallon
ground storage tank. The project included blasting and recoatingthe
interior, and spot -blasting and over -coating the exterior. Aa interior
blasting occurred, itbecame evident that the condition ofthe steel
rafters was worse than previous inspections indicated, aothe scope
of the project was altered to replace the steel in the worst condition.
Various improvements tothe tanks' safety measures were performed
aawell aadisinfection and site restoration. On-site construction
inspection for the duration of the project included reviewing submittals
and shop drawings, observing the work for conformance with the
contract construction documents, reviewing progress and final
pay requests prepared bythe contractor, reviewing change orders,
notifying the Village ofitems not inconformance and providing photo
documentation of the project.
Standp�lipe Structural & Coating IRIehaNkllklitatlion U
Northwest Suburban IlYlluiK11611pal Jdlint Action Water,
Agency
Greater Chicago Area, Illinois
Res�ldeint eingUineenfor the structural repair and coating of the interior
and exterior ofa5 MGvveatStandpipeforNSMJAVVA.Theexiating
overflow scupper became overloaded with ice and tore away from the
aide of the Standpipe' tearing a hole in the vva||. In addition, the coating
system previously installed fourteen years prior was beginning to fail.
The project included repairs tothe overflow scupper, areinforced
connection ofthe overflow scupper tothe Standpipe, blasting of
the interior, exterior, and pilasters of the Standpipe' and application
Steve Crede
Construction Manager
ofathree-part coating system for all surfaces. The project required
coordination with NSMJAVVA'the Village ofHoffman Estates, the Cook
County Forest Preserve District, various utility companies, and the
ongoing construction for the Route 72bridge over the |-q0Tb||way
Campbell & IlYllaplewood �llevated ["ank Structural &
Coating IR"ehaNkIlklitation U V1111age olf IR"an'touil
Rantoul, Illinois
Coinstiructioin rinainager for the coating & structural rehabilitation for
a one -million gallon potable water elevated storage tank and a five -
hundred thousand gallon potable water elevated storage tank. The
Project includes blasting and recoating of the exterior and interior of
the one -million gallon tank atCampbell, spot blasting and over -coating
ofthe interior ofthe five -hundred thousand gallon tank at Maplewood,
various improvements tothe Tanks' safety measures, steel work, and
site improvements and restoration. Responsibilities included inspection
and documentation ofthe contractor's work. The project required
coordination with the Village and local residents.
Ed1huicaIii airi
o� BS, Civil Engineering
o� BA, Engineering Physics
Reg IiisIIr Iii airis
o� Engineer -in -Training
o� IDOT Documentation
Certification of Contract
Quantities
o� OSHA 10 -HP Construction
3
Matt Dunlop years of'
Resident Project Representative e-xpenence
Matt Dunlop has experience in various aspects of both design and
construction of water -related projects. His educational background
provided him with knowledge needed for the design of a variety of
project types including collection, treatment, and transmission and
distribution
Station 5114 Grotiind Storage 1"ank 11N:Z`ehaNkllklitatlion III
V1111age o1f IMlotjint F)rospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
Part of the design team for the rehabilitation of a I million gallon ground
storage tank. The project included blasting and recoating the interior,
and spot -blasting and over -coating the exterior. As interior blasting
occurred, it became evident that the condition of the steel rafters was
worse than previous inspections indicated, so the scope of the project
was altered to replace the steel in the worst condition. This additional
work was completed without significantly affecting the overall project
cost. Various improvements to the tanks' safety measures were
performed as well as disinfection and site restoration.
Standp�lipe Strvic'Nira! & Coating 11N:Z`ehaNkllklitatlion 1I
Northwest Stjibtjilrban MltjiKlidlipa! J611nt Action Water,
Agency
Greater Chicago Area, Illinois
I ead des�lgin eing�lineeiir for the rehabilitation of a 5 -MG standpipe owned
by the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency
(NSMJAWA) in the greater Chicago area. The standpipe is one of two
that provides pressure equalization and water storage for NSMJAWA's
100 -MGD transmission system which supplies water to seven Chicago -
area suburbs. The project included structural repairs, coating system
improvements, and site access road design. Responsibilities included
production of design drawings, design of site access road and grading
plan, permit applications, bidding support and cost estimate.
Carnpbe!hll and Mlap!ewood I.....Ilevated r"ank Coating &
Strvic'Nira! IIN:Z'eIN a l lii 111 lii t at lii n III V1111age o1f 11N:Z`antotji!
Rantoul, Illinois
Res�ldeint eing�lineeiir for the coating & structural rehabilitation for a
one -million gallon potable water elevated storage tank and a five -
hundred thousand gallon potable water elevated storage tank. The
BURNS &MSDONNE LL' 0
Matt Dunlop
Resident Project Representative
Project includes blasting and recoating of the exterior and interior of
the one -million gallon tank atCampbell, spot blasting and over -coating
ofthe interior ofthe five -hundred thousand gallon tank at Maplewood,
various improvements tothe Tanks' safety measures, steel work and
site improvements and restoration. Responsibilities included inspection
and documentation ofthe contractor's work. The project required
coordination with the Village and local residents.
����N�����������������������������N�N���N���
�N��NN�������������N������N����������N�NN��NN���
ViUz�� geofMount: F)nos�pec t: Mount: F)nos�pect:,|L
The Village ofMount Prospect has two l-MGground
storage tanks at Booster Pumping Station 5. The
north tank was inspected byothers and was found
toneed rehabilitation. The inspection recommended
structural and coating rehabilitation and upgrades
tovarious tank components to meet OSHA safety
requirements.
The project included blasting and recoating the
interior, and spot -blasting and over -coating the
exterior. Aainterior blasting occurred, itbecame
evident that the condition ofthe steel rafters was
worse than previous inspections indicated, aothe
scope ofthe project was altered toreplace the
steel inthe worst condition. This additional work
was completed without significantly affecting the
overall project cost. Various improvements tothe
tanks' safety measures were performed aawell aa
disinfection and site restoration.
Burna& McDonnell developed construction bid
document, provided bidding phase services,
logging inquiries, distributing plans in paper and
electronic format, tabulating bids and providing a
bid recommendation for award of the project. A
construction permit from the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (|EA4)was also obtained.
Burna& McDonnell also provided construction
observation and inspection services. On-site
construction inspection for the duration ofthe
project included reviewing submittals and shop
drawings, observing the work for conformance with
the contract construction documents, reviewing
progress and final pay requests prepared by the
contractor, reviewing change orders, notifying the
Village ofitems not inconformance and providing
photo documentation of the project.
Project Statistics
Client Name I Village of Mount Prospect
Construction Cost 1 $470,000
Project Reference
Sean Dorsey, Director ofPublic Works
Public Works Department
l7OOWest Central Road
Mount Prospect, |L5OO55
847870-5540
sdorsey@)mountproepect.org
Project I earn
Client Manager: Randy Patchett
Project Manager: Joe Darlington
Construction Manager: Steve Creole
Staff Engineer: Matt Dunlop
Services Provided
Elevated Tank Inspection
Coating System Design
Bid Document Preparation
Bid Phase Services
Permitting
Construction Services
��N��N���NN��I � ��o��N���� N�����N�N� N���N����
�N���N����������NN��������N�NN��NN���
Northwest SubuMbznMunicipz|Joint:/4ctionVVsft:erAgency GroveViUz��ge'|L
The Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action
Water Agency (NSMJAVVA) owns and operates
two 5.0-mi||ion-ga||onpotable water storage tanks
and engaged Burns & McDonnell toprovide design,
bidding and construction services for the repair and
recoatingofboth tanks. Built inlqO4and last painted
inlqq7the tanks needed maintenance attention.
During the previous winter months, significant
icing within the west standpipe damaged the Oft�
xl2ft. overflow cone causing it to break free of its
mounting, and opened ahole inthe tank wall. The
overflow cone was completely separated from the
tank interior and settled at the bottom of the tank
which remained in service. Included in the project
specifications was the repair orreplacement ofthe
overflow cone. Burna& McDonnell provided plans for
the fabrication of new cone as an alternate bid for
the project.
Construction of the Project was completed in
two separate phases. The west standpipe was
rehabilitated first and included repairs tothe
damaged section ofthe west Standpipe wall, repair
orreplacement ofthe west Standpipe overflow cone,
additional support for the overflow cone inthe west
Standpipe, blasting and recoatingofthe exterior and
interior of the west Standpipe' disinfection and site
restoration.
BURNS &MSDONNE LL' 0
Project Statistics
Client Name I Northwest Municipal Joint
Action Water Agency
Construction Cost I $2M
Project Reference
Kevin J.Lockhart, Deputy Director
9OlWellington Avenue
Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60631
Project I earn
Client Manager: Randy Patchett
Project Manager/Lead Engineer: Joe
Darlington
Construction Manager: Steve Creole
Staff Engineer: Matt Dunlop
Services Provided
Coating System Design
Structural Design
Construction Inspection
Construction Engineering
The east standpipe was rehabilitated in2COOand
included repair orreplacement ofthe east Standpipe
overflow cone, additional support for the overflow
cone, blasting and recoatingofthe exterior and
interior of the east Standpipe' disinfection and site
restoration. The east standpipe contract also includes
construction ofanew gravel access road and site
drainage improvements.
Bunna& McDonnell provided bidding phase
administration services, logging inquiries,
distributing plans in paper and electronic format,
tabulating bids and providing a bid recommendation
for award of the project.
Bunna& McDonnell also provided construction
observation and inspection services. Onsite
construction inspection for the duration of
the project including observing the work for
conformance with the contract construction
documents, review submittals and shop drawings,
review progress and final pay requests prepared
bythe contractor, review change orders, notify the
agency ofitems not inconformance and provide
photo documentation of the project.
BURNS,\ZMSDONNELL' 0
Tk%K 510 STRUCTURkI & WAVING lk�3111 NTATNON
Nevvport:Chernicz| Depot /4uAhority VerrniUion County, |N
Bunna& McDonnell iacurrently providing owner's
engineering services for the Newport Chemical
Depot Reuse Authority as part of the redevelopment
of the former Newport Chemical Depot into the
Vermillion Rise Mega Park. The project includes
the development of regional water system to
provide service to large industrial customers and
communities inwest central Indiana and central
One aspect ofthe project involved rehabilitation of
anexisting l0[\000gallon legged elevated water
storage tank. Services provided included:
o� Elevated tank inspection b» identify required
improvements. The inspection found that numerous
features of the tank were non-compliant with
current safety codes, windage rods providing
support to the tank needing adjustment to prevent
structural deterioration, and the interior and exterior
coating systems had elevated levels oflead that
required remediation.
o� Design of structural and coating system
improvements. The design addressed code
compliance, safety, structural, and complete blasting
and recoating of the interior and exterior of the tank.
o� Preparation of construction bid documents. Plan
drawings and specifications were developed.
o� Bid phase services. Distributing plans inpaper and
electronic format, logging inquiries, tabulating bids
and providing a bid recommendation for award of
the project.
o� Regulatory & permitting support. A construction
permit was obtained from the Indiana Department
ofEnvironmental Management.
o� Resident project representative services. Submittal
review, construction inspection, change order
preparation, pay application processing, record
Project Statistics
Client Name INewport Chemical Depot
Reuse Authority
Construction Cost 1 $500,000
Project Reference
Bob Grewe, Executive Director
1051 W. Indiana Ave.
Hillsdale, Indiana 47854
765-245-2415
Project I earn
Client Manager: Randy Patchett
Project Manager: Joe Darlington
Construction Manager: Joe Darlington
Services Provided
Tank Inspection
Design
Regulatory & Permitting Support
Cost Estimating
Bid Phase Services
Construction Inspection
Resident Project Representative
N & MAIPN ��WID & CON11"NNG A131[N N�All"RIN
ViU��eofI::"�..ntou|
Multiple elevated tanks provide storage in the Village
ofAantou|'awater system. Among them are the
1 -million -gallon spheroidal elevated tank atCampbell
Street and the 500'000-ga||onlegged elevated
tank at Maplewood Drive. Both tanks required
structural and coating rehabilitation and upgrades
tovarious tank features to meet new OSHA safety
requirements.
The Project included blasting and recoating of the
interior and exterior ofthe Campbell Elevated Tank,
spot -blasting and over -coating ofthe interior and
exterior of the Maplewood Elevated Tank, various
improvements tothe Tanks' safety measures,
steel work, disinfection and site restoration.
Burna& McDonnell prepared bid documents with a
complete scope of work. Aconatruction permit from
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency was also
obtained.
Burna& McDonnell provided bidding phase
administration services, logging inquiries, distributing
plans in paper and electronic format, tabulating bids
and providing a bid recommendation for award of
the project.
Burna& McDonnell also provided construction
observation and inspection services. Onsite
construction inspection for the duration ofthe
project including review ofsubmittals and shop
drawings, observing the work for conformance
Project Statistics
Client Name I Village of Rantoul
Construction Cost I $11M
Project Reference
Greg Haze|, Director ofPublic Works
2OOVKGrove Ave.
Rantoul, Illinois 5l855
217-892-5525
Project I earn
Client Manager: Randy Patchett
Project Manager: Joe Darlington
Construction Manager: Steve Creole
Resident Representative: Matt Dunlop
Services Provided
Elevated Tank Inspection
Coating System Design
Bid Document Preperation
Permitting
Construction Services
with the contract construction documents, review
progress and final pay requests prepared by the
contractor, review change orders, notify the Village
ofitems not inconformance and providing photo
documentation of the project.
0 �
I : Parris & MccI )c.rn nell is a global 'firm wif.h over 10 c is[ .Jnc; . log ..i iiness lines. S.aff assigned f.o
fhe Village of Prc.r<.peccf.I,ZehabiR.af.�on of f.he 1,000,000 C::'allc.rn S.af.�on .r7I C::'ro�.arocf
`' .oriaC, e lank projeccC. are a parC. of o, ..irChic.:aC)C.,7area \A/aC.er Prac..Jc.e. ACi: b . lal.J,. n of Chs
`)ro�..ip's c;�..irrenf. projec;f. workload is below.
Burr Ridge, Village of
County Line Road Sidewalk
Design (Civil)
$70,000
6 months
Crede
Improvements
Elk Grove, Village of
Greenleaf & Busse Pump
Design (Water)
$2,000,000
t year
Darlington
Stations Rehabilitation
($200,000)
Lord Street Phase II and
Design & Construction
$30,000,000
Elgin, City of
Basin 02A Combined Sewer
Services (Water,
($3,500,000)
5 years
Crede
Separation
Stormwater & Wastewater)
Fox River Water Reclamation
Phase III & IV Sludge Force
Construction Services
$3,700,000
9 months
Crede
District
Main
(Wastewater)
($200,000)
Dunlop
Frankfort, Village of
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Program Management
$60,000,000
5 years
Crede
Consolidation Program
(Wastewater)
($1,200,000)
Darlington
General Electric Corp.
Strother Field Environmental
Program Management
Confidential
Ongoing
Patchett
Services
(Environmental)
Newport Chemical Depot
Reuse Authority (NeCDRA) Agreed Order Support Owner's Engineering $28,000 6 months Darlington
Northwest Suburban Joint Darlington
Action Water Agency Owner's Engineering Owner's Engineering As -requested Ongoing Patchett
(NSMJAWA)
Rantoul, Village of Industrial Park Force Main Study (Wastewater) $15,000 1 year Darlington
Rantoul, Village of Village Engineering Village Engineering(Various)
Rantoul, Village of Sodium Hypochlorite System Design (Water)
Concept Design
BURNS MSDONNELL' 0
As requested Ongoing DarlingtonPatchett
$11,500 3 months Darlington
Patchett
t0%
t0%
75%
25%
30%
50%
90%
Thorn Creek Basin Sanitary
Annex North Road and
Study (Civil)
$25,000
3 months
Darlington 75%
District
Fencing Rehabilitation
United Airlines
Hangar 5C Oil/Water
Construction Services
$40,000
3 months
Dunlop 80%
Seperator
(Stormwater)
Wet Weather Flow
Darlington
Villa Park, Village of
Treatment Facility 0&M
Study (Wastewater)
$15,000
3 months
Patchett
Schedule
Wet Weather Flow
Darlington
Villa Park, Village of
Treatment Facility Chain &
Design (Wastewater)
$30,000
6 months
Patchett
Flight Replacement
BURNS MSDONNELL' 0
BURNS MSDONNELL"0
Village of Mt. Prospect
BURNS M_C1ONPYELL
Rehabilitation of Station 5E Ground Stora a Tank
71V-7 Wama
09g1nal Start In
1 12016
6uration
Feb Mar ' Apr, way
Jun, JulAug, Sep "
MENEM
Design Consultant Contract Award
0 05 -Feb -19
Kick-off Meeting
1 12 -Feb -19 12 -Feb -19
I
I I
Prepare and Submit Preliminary Plans to Village
19 13 -Feb -19 11 -Mar -19
O
Field DataAcquisition
4 13 -Feb -19 18 -Feb -19
--------------- ---------------------------
❑
----------
Prepare and Submit Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
9 27 -Feb -19 11 -Mar -19
l�
Prepare and Submit TEPA Permit Application
1 11 -Mar -19 11 -Mar -19
Prepare and Submit Final Construction Cost Estimate
10 12 -Mar -19 25 -Mar -19
l�
Prepare and Submit Final Plans to Village
10 12 -Mar -19 25 -Mar -19
O
-------------------------------------
Bidding and Bid Opening
15 01 -Apr -19 19 -Apr -19
O
Bid Evaluation and Recommendation
5 22 -Apr -19 26 -Apr -19
❑
Award Construction Contract
5 29 -Apr -19 03 -May -19
❑
Construction
103 06 -May -19 30 -Sep -19
--------------------------
---------
Pre -Construction Meeting
1 06 -May -19 06 -May -19
Substantial Completion
0 30 -Sep -19
O
Post -project Review
20 01 -Oct -19 28 -Oct -19
Project Complete
0 28 -Oct -19 ---------------_------
-
BURNS MSDONNELL"0
BURNS ISMCDONNELL:.
CREATE AMAZING.
H11 Sulk, /100
I)own l-,) rovr�. 11.... 50515
L,urnsrncd coi n
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Professional Services
For Rehabilitation of the 1,000,000 Gallon
Station 5E Ground Storage Tank
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Proposals due January 21, 2018
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Professional Services
Rehabilitation of the 1,000,000 Gallon Station 5E Ground Storage Tank
Date: December 27, 2018
Summary
The Village of Mount Prospect is seeking proposals from qualified consultants for
engineering and inspection services associate with the rehabilitation of Booster Station
5E ground storage tank. (Attachment A, Map)
Background
As part of our ongoing preventative maintenance efforts, a field observation and
inspection was completed in September of 2017 at the reservoir Booster pumping
station 5E, location at 112 E. Highland Avenue in Mount Prospect (Attachment B,
inspection report). The purpose of the inspection was to determine any changes in
condition of the tanks interior, exterior, visible foundation and accessories since the time
of the last evaluation.
Problem Statement
The Village seeks a qualified consultant to provide specified civil engineering services
necessary to let, award, and implement a rehabilitation construction project utilizing
contracted resources. The scope and scale of this proposed project will be limited by
available funding.
Project Scope
The consultant will provide professional engineering services and provided, at a
minimum the following-
Design/Bidding Phase
1. Consultant shall prepare detailed plans and specifications suitable for
bidding. Plans and specifications shall conform to all current Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois environmental Protection agency and standard
specifications for water tank facilities construction in Illinois design
criteria.
2. Consultant will make application for and obtain any and all necessary
permits.
3. Consultant shall supply a detailed engineer's estimate of costs for
construction of the project.
4. Consultant shall submit all bid documents to the Village for review and
approval prior to distribution
5. Consultant shall advertise and solicit bids for the proposed project from
qualified, capable, and experienced water tank construction contractors.
All prospective bidders will obtain plans and specifications from the
consultant.
6. Consultant shall evaluate bids, check references, verify contractor
representations, and make a written recommendation for award to the
Village.
7. Consultant shall assist the Village in assembling all construction contract
documents necessary for execution of the awarded contract.
Construction Management and Inspection Phase
1. Consultant shall conduct a preconstruction conference with
representatives of the Owner, Contractor(s), Utilities and other interested
parties affected by the proposed construction.
2. Consultant shall provide resident engineers, inspectors, technicians, and
surveyors for the project as follows
Provide a Resident Engineer/inspector (RE/1) for daily
observation of the work during the construction period to
observe and record construction progress under the general
guidance of the engineer. On the basis of on-site
observation, the engineer will keep the owner informed of
the progress of the work, shall endeavor to guard the owner
against defects and deficiencies in the work of the
contractors, and may disapprove or reject work as failing to
conform to the contract documents.
ii. Prior to the start of construction, the consultant shall make a
digital photographic survey of the targeted work zone(s) to
document existing conditions of both public and private
property. The survey shall be conducted at a scale sufficient
to note defects in driveways, sidewalks, structures, and
landscaping in or adjacent to probable construction work
areas.
iii. Prepare written daily inspection reports. Reports are to be
delivered to Owner in an electronic format. Digital
photographs documenting work tasks in progress as well as
any potential problems or unusual conditions shall also be
included with each report.
iv. Assist the owner in preparation of any necessary change
order and/or field directives.
V. Process monthly applications for payment submitted by the
contractor(s), and forward to owner with recommendations
for approval and payment.
vi. Assist the owner with the resolution of inquiries, complaints,
or concerns raised by residents or the general public.
vii. Review shop drawings and other equipment/material
submittals as may be required by the contract documents.
viii. Perform field observation of all completed work before a final
application for payment is processed for the contractor.
ix. Revise the original plans in accordance with construction
observation records of the resident engineer, inspectors and
the contractor, and supply the owner with one set of as -built
drawings in a suitable electronic format.
Proposed Schedule
Submit proposals
21 -Jan -19
Review Submittals
21 -Jan -19 — 29 —Jan -19
Award Contract
5 -Feb -19
2019 Kick -Off Meeting
12 -Feb -19
Submit Preliminary plans to Village
11 -Mar -19
Submit final plans to Village
25 -Mar -19
Bid Opening
Apr -19
Construction
May — Aug 2019
Substantial Completion
Sept 2019
Post project review
Oct 2019
Technical Proposal
The Consultant's technical proposal shall be organized so that the outline generally
follows the format of this request for proposals. The proposal shall cover the approach
and the methodology the Consultant intends to use in carrying out the project. The
technical proposal should also include statements setting forth the Consultant's line of
business, organizational structure, summary of past experience, and specific descriptions
of at least three (3) projects completed in the Chicago metropolitan area that are similar
in subject, size, and complexity to the scope of services specified herein. These
descriptions must include contact information for reputable references that can attest the
Consultant's representations.
Cost Proposal
The consultant will quote a not -to -exceed price for each phase of the services described
under Scope of Services. Each price quote should include a breakdown by personnel
classification and estimated number of hours spent by each. Price proposals should be
submitted as a distinct document in a separate sealed envelope marked:
Cost Proposal for Engineering Services
Rehabilitation of the 1,000,000 Gallon Station 5E Storage Tank
Proposal due January 21, 2019
Present Work Load
A complete tabulation of the Consultant's current project workload is to be included. Each
project shall be identified by name, type, size, duration, and personnel assigned.
Personnel
Professional resumes, including education, work experience, professional credentials,
and employment status (e.g. full-time, part-time, years with the firm, job description) for
each individual to be assigned to the project described herein should be provided.
Disqualification of Proposals
More than one proposal for the same work described herein from an individual, firm or
partnership, a corporation or an association under the same or different names, will not
be considered. Reasonable grounds for believing that any party is interested in more
than one proposal for the work contemplated will cause the rejection of all proposals in
which said party is interested. If there are reasonable grounds for believing that collusion
exists among the parties submitting proposals, the proposals of the participants in such
collusion will not be considered.
Licenses
Each party submitting a proposal shall possess all necessary federal, state, and local
licenses as are required by law, and shall furnish satisfactory proof to the Village upon
request that the licenses are in effect during the entire period of the Contract.
Award of Contract
The award of any Contract may be made to the Consultant who submits the proposal
which is in the best interest of the Village as evaluated by Village staff. Such evaluations
will include the experience of the Consultant, capability of the Consultant, and other
factors deemed by Village staff to be in the best interest of the Village.
In addition, the Village reserves the rights to accept or reject any and all proposals, to
waive any informality in any proposals, and to accept any proposals considered
advantageous to the Village.
Proposals
Proposals should be addressed to:
Casey Botterman
Water/Sewer Superintendent
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1700 W. Central Rd., Mount Prospect, IL 60056.
Proposals can also be delivered via e-mail (cbotterman(c-Dmountprospect.or ). All
proposals should be clearly labeled in the following manner:
Proposal for Engineering Services
Rehabilitation of the 1,000,000 Gallon Station 5E Storage Tank
Proposals due January 21, 2019
All proposals must be received at the Mount Prospect Public
Works facility no later than 12:00 PM local time on January 21, 2019.
Village of Mount Prospect
Rehabilitation of the 1,000,000 Gallon Station 5E Ground Storage Tank
Estimated Feesfor Design Engineering& Bid Phase Services
January 21, 2019
TaskDesciptiosn
Project
Manager
(17)"
Senior
Elect ical
Enoenear
(14)
Senior
Engineer
(13)
Aswstant
Project
Manages
(12)
Project P[ojoa
Engineer Assf4ant
(9) {7)
Ex0enses
Task
Total
Task 1 - Project Coordination
$ 2,640
Kickoff Meeting
2
2
$ 25
$ 791
Project Management & Administration
2
1
2
$ 754
Design Review Meetings w/ Village (3)
6
$ 75
$ 1,095
Task 2 - Preliminary Design
$ 3,023
Existing Data Review
1
2
$ 420
Field Investigation
4
4
$ 25
$ 1,205
Valve Vault Electrical Design
2
8
$ 1,398
Task 3 - Final Design
I
$ 3,862
Construction Bid Documents
4
8
$ 100
$ 1,780
Final EOPCC
1
1
4
$ 869
Quality Assurance Review
1
4
2
$ 1,213
Task 4 - Permitting Support
$ 445
IEPA - Water Main Construction Permit
1
2
$ 25
$ 445
Task 5 - Bid Phase Support
$ 2,672
Provide Bid Documents
4
$ 316
Pre -Bid Meeting
2
2
$ 25
$ 615
Bid Assistance
2
2
$ 590
Bid Opening
2
$ 25
$ 365
Bid Review & Recommendation
1
2
$ 420
Assemble Contract Documents
4
$ 50
$ 366
Total hours 4 4 4 27 36 10
Hourly Billing Rate 213 199 191 170 125 79
Subtotals $852 $796 $764 $4,590 $4,500 $790 $ 350 $ 12,642
Total Hours 85
Total Fee $ 12,642
IIII II
BURNS MSDONNELL"
Village of Mount Prospect
Rehabilitation of the 1,000,000 Gallon Station 5E Ground Storage Tank
Estimated Fees for Construction Management and I nspection Services
January 21, 2019
Task Description
Construction
Manager
(13)
Resident
Project
Representative
(10)
Project
Engineer
(9)
Project
Assistant
(7)'.
Expenses
Task
Taal
Task 1 - Project Coordination
$
2,632
Preconstruction Conference
2
4
$
946
Project Management & Administration'
8
2
$
1,686
Task 2 - Resident Engineering & Inspection
$
20,044
Preconstruction Photographs
2
$
25 $
307
Submittal Review
8
$
1,128
Resident Engineering / Inspection "
8
116
$
725 $
18,609
Task 3 - Project Closeout
$
2,624
Punch List...
2
1 $
50 $
2,124
Conforming to Construction Documents
4
1
1 $
500
Total hours
Hourly Billing Rate
Subtotals
Notes.
. Based on attending (1) progress meeting.
20 142 l
191 141 125
$3,820 $20,022 $500
" Based on four (4) hours per day for 29 si to vi si is per the scope of services.
*** Based on four (4) hours per day for 2 sitevisitsand preparing a punch list.
III
BURNS MSDONNELL"
79
$158 $ 800 $ 25,300
Total Hours 168
Total Fee $ 25,300
�rfR \i
TANK. IN koNSULTANTSWoe
.f a J\�\ ?«*. ®\.■:. ■- �� �
�.■�■.■fa �f. a? \§. .. : «e�? � \�ef J2� /J».\
. , <ww■ i`
fit
. . < e
FOP.
September 13, 2047
17.055.H373M6
\� .
October 6, 2017
TANK
SUPJECT-.
INDUSTRY'
The subject of this report is the update field evaluation of the 1,000,000 gallon
CONSULTANTS
steel ground storage tank in Mt. Prospect, Illinois. The tank was owned by Mt.
Prospect Public Works and was known as the "Tank 5E (South Tank)." The
field evaluation was performed on September 13, 2017 by Gregory P. Cannon,
7740 West New York Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46214
NACE Certified Coating Inspector Level 3, Certificate No. 10339 and Jamie
317 / 271-3100 - Phone
L. Stewart, NACE Coating Inspector Level 1, Certified Certificate No. 64809.
317 / 271-3300 - M
The Owner's representative on the site at the time of the field evaluation was
Jay Gomez. The tank was previously evaluated by Tank Industry Consultants
onNovember 25 and 26, 2013. Tank Industry Consultants prepared a Request
for Proposals for replacement of the roof stiffener across the roof center hub in
2014. The dome roof tank was of welded steel construction. According to
Sacramento, CaHornia
information on the tank nameplate, the tank was constructed in 1966 by
,916 / 717-3608
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company under contract number 9-4105. The tank
nameplate also indicated the tank was, 74 ft in diameter and had a height of
Plainfield, Illinois
32 ft.
815 / 556-8335
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
OBJECTIW:
412 / 262-1586
The purpose of this washout and update evaluation was to determine any
El Paso, Texas
changes in the condition of the tank interior, exterior, visible foundation, and
915 / 790-0790
accessories since the time of the last evaluation. The purpose of this report is
to present the findings of the evaluation and to make recommendations for
Houston, Texas
recoating, repairing, corrosion protection, and maintenance. Budget estimates
281/ 367-3511
for the work, anticipated life of the coating and the structure, and the
replacement cost of the tank are also included.
AUTHORIZATION:
This washout, evaluation, disinfection, and report were authorized in the
Village of Mount Prospect Purchase Order 2017-00000218 dated February 13,
2017.
EXECUTIVE SUNUMLA-RY:
The exterior coating system appeared to be in fair to good overall condition as
isolated areas of peeled topcoating and corrosion were noted. The exterior
surfaces should not need to be repainted' within the next 3 to 5 years from a
corrosion standpoint. The exterior should be re-evaluated in 3 to 5 years in
accordance with A recommendations to determine a more precise
recoating schedule. The interior surfaces of the tank should be repainted
within the next 2 to 3 years due to rafter corrosion and corrosion above the
high water level.
Jn Employee- Owned Com pany
1, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 2
17,055.H373.006
ANSVOSELA and Safety -Related Deficiencies: There were OSHA and safety-related deficiencies
observed on this tank. These deficiencies included:
+ the electrical equipment in the valve vault did not appear to include ground fault interrupt circuit,
* the exterior ladder width was too small (29 CFR 1910.23(b)(4)),
+ the safe -climbing device on the exterior ladder was, cracked (29 CFR 1910.29(i)(6)),
* the safe -climbing device did not extend over the entire length of the: ladder (29 CFR
1910.28(b)(9)(ii)(A)),
* the roof safety railing was not equipped with a self-closing gate (29 Glib 1,9110.28(b)(3)(iv)),
* the gaps between the toe bar and roof exceeded the maximum allowed 1/4 in (291 CFR
1910.29(k)(1)(iii)), and
+ the roof safety railing handrail did not meet OSHA loading requirements, (29 CFR 1910.29(b)(3)).
If the Owner wishes to filly comply with OSHA and safety-related standards, it is recommended that
these deficiencies be rectified.
AWWA, Sanitary, and Operational Deficiency* There was an AWWA, sanitary, and operating
deficiency observed on this tank as, well-.
* there was an approximate 1/2 in. wide gap between the overflow pipe and flap gate.
This deficiency should be corrected.
The safety-related, sanitary, and operating deficiencies listed above are not intended to be a complete
list of deficiencies on this tank. The Owner should refer to the complete report text of the previous
report,, this report, and accompanying photographs, for a complete account of all observed deficiencies.
This evaluation and the reporting of the condition of this tank do not warrant the original structural
condition of the tank or any of the original design for seismic loadings. Likewise, recommendations
for this tank do not include modifications which may be 'required for compliance with present structural
codes.
Vj_ 10 C91 n-141"al T NO
Color photographs were taken of the visible portions of the foundation, the tank interior and exterior
and are included as a part of this report.
Qrlla_1_20181
Warning: Some appurtenances on this tank may be referred to as erection or rigging
attachments, lugs, or brackets. This does not mean that they are safe for rigging. Each
attachment for each tank should be evaluated on an individual basis by a structural engineer or
an experienced rigger before being used. These devices may have been intended for only the
original erectors and painters to use with specialized equipment.
I, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E,(SSouth Tank) Page 3
Mt. Prqseect Public Works, Mt. ProTect, Illinois --.17 055. 373.006
F.A.03,00 I W*1
All adhesion tests performed during this evaluation were done in general accordance with ASTM
D3359. The results are reported herein using the ASTM scale. The ASTM scale is, a relative scale to
rate adhesion, from 0 to 5 with 5 being the best. A table of adhesion test results classification is
included with this report.
DEAD MIETALS TESTS:
Samples of the exterior and interior coating systems were sent to a laboratory for atomic absorption
analyses at the time of the previous evaluation. The test results were as follows:
Exterior <25 <0.0025% <250 < ' 0.025% 817 10.0817%
Interior <25 <0.0025% <250 <0.025% <250 1 <0.025%
Tank Industry Consultants performs this test only to determine if there is lead, cadmium, or chromium
present in the coating samples. To limit damage to the existing coating, only small areas were tested.
The small number of samples taken and the difficulty of retrieving all primer from the steel profile may
cause the tests performed to not accurately represent the total coating system. Variations in thickness,
types of coatings applied, and the interim cleaning and painting operations will also affect the actual
readings. The reliability of the results is also dependent on the amount of primer included in the
sample. Additional testing to determine the amount of leachable contaminants present in the spent
cleaning debris will need to be performed following cleaning operations at the time of repainting.
The condition of the items not referred to in the OBSERVATIONS section of this report appeared to be
in approximately the same condition as they were at the time of the last evaluation
A. Foundation and site
'The tank site, surrounding area, and valve vault were in similar condition as was observed at the
previous evaluation. The condition of the foundation had worsened slightly, as additional cracking was
observed. Coating overspray and mildew were observed on the foundation. Widespread cracking and
disbanding were observed in the sealant at the foundation -to -bottom plate interface.
1, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 4
Mt. frospect Public Works, Mt. fjos ect,noz , s 17.055.H3'73.006
B. Exterior Surfaces
CoLtiM Thicicuess Approx. % Failure to
Metal Loss
Range
Typical Underlying Rust
Adhesion Typical Ileepest
cos ft
Shell 6.5 mils; to 17 mils
10 Mils 1/2% < 1/2%
5S Neg.
Roof 10 nils to 23 mils
14 mils Neg. <12%
4S Neg. t7e . ....
Key to Table
Adhesion 5 (very good)
T = Topcoat to Underlying Coating
Neg. negligible
4 (good)
3 (fair)
S = Primer to Steel
2 (poor)
1 (very poor)
0 (very poor)
The coating on the exterior of the tank appeared to be in fair to good overall condition and had
deteriorated slightly since the time of the previous evaluation. Extensive mildew was observed on the
exterior shell and isolated areas of peeled topcoating were noted. A conduit extended up the west side
of the shell and roof attached with magnets. A gap was observed between the overflow pipe and flap
gate. The exterior ladder notched -tube safe -climbing device had been rolled to the wrong radius and
was cracked at the roof, The safe -climbing terminated 4 in. below the top roof ladder rung. The roof
access through the safety railing was not equipped with a self-closing gate. The safe -climbing device
should not be accessed until the cracked safe -climbing device is repaired or replaced. Corrosion
was observed on the ladder and brackets. The clog -resistant vent screen was in good condition. The
coating on the roof had weathered. Two antennas were mounted to a mast adjacent to the roof vent and
appeared capable of operating as intended. The antenna ground wire was clamped to the roof vent
flange.
C. Interior Surfaces
ROOF SUPPORT STRUCTURE:
Stiffeners:
Outer: 33
Inner: 20
Size. 3-1/2 in. x 3 in. x 1/4 in., angle
Center Hub, -
Construction: approx. 6 in. x 4 in. x. 3/8 in., angle
Diameter: approx. 15 ft
Circumferential Stiffener: 6 in. x 4 in. x 1/4 in. angle
1, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 5
Mt. Prqseect Public Works, Mt. Prospect,noz . s 17.1 55. 3 73.006
CATHODIC PROTECTION:
Anode:
Type: submerged wire w/ floats
Number: I
Reference Electrode:
Number: I
Location: west perimeter
INTERIOR PIPING:
hilet/Outlet Pipe:
Size: 16 in, diameter
Projection: 6 in.. above floor
Reinforcing Pad: 26 in. diameter x O�.343 in. to 0.346 in. thick
Protective Cover: none
Pipe:
Size: 30 in- diameter
Projection: 4 in. above floor
Reinforcing Pad: 30 in. diameter x 0.355 in. to 0.358 in. thick
Protective Cover: none
Sump:
Size, 24 in. diameter
Type: flanged
Size: 32 in. diameter x 0.543 in. to 0.548 in. thick
Depth: 9 in.
INTERIOR COATING AND METAL 'CONDITION (additional informationfrom the previous report
is bolded).
Key to -Table
Adhesion 5 (gory good) T = Topcoat, to Underlying Coating Neg. = negligible
4 (good)
3 (fair) S = Primer to Steel
2 (poor)
I (very poor)
0 (very poor)
The previous evaluation of the tank interior below water level was performed using an ROV, and the
roof support structure was evaluated using, a raft. Therefore, additional dimensions, information, and
data concerning the condition of the surfaces below the water level, not previously available, are
included in this report.
Coatin Thickness
% Failure to
Adhesion
Metal Loss
Range I
Typical
Primer
Rust
Typical De(
Roof
12 mils to 26.5 mils
15 mils
Nee.
Tie -
5 S
Neg. N
Shell
11.1 mils to 21.9 mils
16 tnils
< 1/2 %
3S
N
Floor
13.2 mils to 24.6 nWs 1
16.5 mics
Nee.
< 1/2 %
3S
Nep. N
Key to -Table
Adhesion 5 (gory good) T = Topcoat, to Underlying Coating Neg. = negligible
4 (good)
3 (fair) S = Primer to Steel
2 (poor)
I (very poor)
0 (very poor)
The previous evaluation of the tank interior below water level was performed using an ROV, and the
roof support structure was evaluated using, a raft. Therefore, additional dimensions, information, and
data concerning the condition of the surfaces below the water level, not previously available, are
included in this report.
1, 0,00, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 6
Mt. flosp t Public Works, Mi. _Propect, Illinois 17.055K373.0016
The coatings on the interior of the tank had deteriorated slightly since the time of the previous
evaluation. Moderate corrosion was observed along the lapped roof seams and the rafter edges, and
widespread surface rust surrounded the center hub. Cracked and peeled coating was observed on the
roof The roof support structure consisted of 33 outer stiffeners, 20 inner stiffeners, and a center hub.
There was an approximately 3 in. x 4 in. x 1/4 in. angle stiffener across the equator of the center hub.
Welded to the
In leg of the outer roof stiffeners near the roof perimeter was an approximately 6
in. x 4 in. x 1/4 in. T -rail. Widespread spot corrosion was noted on the T -rail. An approximate
16 in. x 6 in. x 1/2 in. angle circumferential stiffener was located along the roof cap -to -finger seam. The
stiffener appeared to be seal welded. A top shell angle was located at the roof -to -shell interface.
Minor previous pitting was observed on the interior shell. Rust had started to bleed through the coating
in the water fluctuation zone. Random small spot corrosion and coating overspray, -runs, and chips
were observed elsewhere on the shell. The cathodic protection system consisted of a submerged wire
anode with floats. The reference electrode was located at the west perimeter of the tank adjacent to a
suspension bracket. The cathodic protection system did not appear to be operating properly as
corrosion was observed at areas of coating failure below the high water level. Ultrasonic thickness
measurements of the tank floor indicated the floor was between 0.366 in. to 0.371 in. thick. Minor
previous pitting and a few blisters were noted on the floor of the tank. The tank was equipped with two
pipes projections and a sump in the floor of the tank. The pipe projections were not equipped with
protective covers.
A. Foundation and Site
1. Site Maintenance: The site should be regraded so that the top of the foundation projects a
minimum of 6 in. to a maximum of 12 in. above grade and so that proper drainage away from the
foundation continues. Site maintenance should be performed with the mower discharge: directed away
from the base of the tank to prevent rock chips in the coating and the accumulation of grass on the
foundation and bottom plate.
2. Tank and Site Security: Water tanks have been defined by some courts under certain
circumstances as attractive nuisances. As such, there may be a significant potential liability to the
Owner for injury to persons on the tank and tank site, even if access is not authorized. Recent events
have prompted the entire water industry to consider measures that inhibit intentional acts that could
threaten the water supply. A review of the security requirements for the tank and site is recommended
to confirm that the existing measures are consistent with the Owner's security requirements for their
water system. Primary tank and site security should be focused on eliminating, preventing, and
detecting unauthorized access to the tank. Such security measures might include routinely and
periodically verifying all manholes and gates are locked, and all exterior access points have suitable
deterrents. Other security measures might include installing site lighting, alarms on manholes and
gates, motion detectors, and surveillance cameras, and arranging more frequent site visits by law
enforcement agencies.
3. Foundation: When the tank exterior is repainted, any unsound concrete should be chipped
to sound material and the concrete should be brush-off blasted. Any deteriorated areas or voids found
1, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 7
Mt. Prospect Public Works, Mt. fLos
pect, nois 17.055.H373.006
should have a bonding agent and a vinyl emollient modified concrete patching mortar applied to build
up the surface to its original contour. The concrete should then be painted with a concrete sealer.
4. Sealant Maintenance: When the exterior repainting is performed, the existing sealant
located along the bottom plate -to -foundation interface should be removed and replaced with a flexible
polyurethane sealant
5. Overhead Power Lines: All overhead power lines within 40 ft of the tank should be
relocated underground in order to prevent potential electrical shock to personnel working on the
tank. The relocation of the power lines, should be performed in accordance with the National Electric
Code (IEC) guidelines.
6. - Valve Vault- All electrical equipment should be modified to"include ground fault interrupt
circuits. The piping and val'. ves located in the valve vault should be cleaned and painted in accordance
with the interior coating recommendations at the time of the tank cleaning and coating. The exterior
concrete surfaces should be cleaned to the equivalent of a brush-off blast cleaning and painted with a
concrete sealer. The valve vault access should continue to be locked at all times in order to limit
liability to the Owner and to protect water system security. Freeze protection should be provided for on
all control piping, and static water lines.
B. Exterior Surfaces
1. Life of the Exterior Coating: The exterior coating system appeared to be in fair to good
overall condition with additional areas of peeled topcoating and corrosion noted. The exterior surfaces
should not need to be repainted within the next 3 to 5 years from a corrosion standpoint. However, the
exterior should be re-evaluated in 3 to 5 years in accordance with AWWA recommendations to
detem-Ane a more precise recoating schedule. Due to the good to very good adhesion of the existing
coating system, spot cleaning and topcoating, may be a feasible option. The exterior coating system
should be evaluated immediately prior to preparing specifications to determine if the coating adhesion
is still adequate to accept a topcoat. Due to the extent of corrosion around one of the shell manholes, it
is recommended this area be spot cleaned and spot coated within the next year.
2. Coating Testing: Prior to preparation of specifications, for the cleaning and coating of the
exterior of the tank, samples of the exterior coating system should be subjected to laboratory analysis to
test for ingredients which may at that time be subject to regulations concerning their handling and
disposal.
3. Cleaning: Due to the fact that the present exterior coatings appear to contain lead, coating
removal should be performed in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations relative to the
removal of heavy-metal based coatings. When the exterior is to be cleaned, all -varieties of containment
should be investigated. Containment of the wind-blown debris will be required, and containment of
paint droplets maybe required due to the proximity of the adjacent residences.
4. Recommended Coating System:
a. Spot Clean and Topcoat: If the exterior is to be repainted within the next few
years, then spot cleaning and topcoating the tank appears to be the recornmended option. The
1, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 8
Mt. Prqs17.055.H373'.00' 6
.,Eect Public Works, Mt. froTect, Illinois
typical life of a spot cleaned and topcoated system is approximately 7 to 8, years, but is highly
dependent on previous surface preparation and the condition of the underlying coating system.
b. Coating Application: The entire exterior surfaces of the tank should be high-
pressure washed to remove chalked coating, mildew, and contaminants. After washing, the
damaged and rusted areas should be spot cleaned to the equivalent of an SSPC-SP 6, Commercial
Blast Cleaning, or SSPC-SP 11, Power Tool Cleaning to Bare Metal. All areas of excessive
coating thickness and runs in the coating should be cleaned to the equivalent of an SSPC-SP 7,
Brush -Off Blast Cleaning, to remove the excessive mils. The spot cleaned areas should receive a
spot prime coat compatible: with the present coating system. 'The entire exterior surfaces should
then be intermediate coated and topcoated with a compatible coating system.
5. Alternative Coating System:
a. Complete Cleaning and Repainting: The optimum long -life coating system
presently available for this site is an epoxy -polyurethane coating system. Properly formulated
and applied polyurethanes have good resistance to condensation, mildew, and chipping. The
polyurethanes also have excellent color and gloss retention and the longest expected service life
of any of the common exterior tank coatings. The typical life of a properly applied epoxy -
polyurethane coating system is approximately 15 to 20 years. These coatings are also presently
manufactured to meet current VOC requirements.
b. Coating Application: The entire tank exterior should be cleaned to the equivalent
of an SSPC-SP 6, Commercial Blast Cleaning and have an epoxy -primed, epoxy intermediate
and polyurethane finish coating system applied. However, care must be taken during the
application of this particular coating system because this, coating does have poor dry -fall
characteristics, and potential damage to the surrounding property must be taken into
consideration. The polyurethane coatings also require close monitoring of temperature and
humidity during application.
6. Effective Service Life: Tank Industry Consultants defines the life of a coating as the
arnount of time before repainting becomes necessary due to coating failure and corrosion. During the
coating life the Owner should expect the coating to lose its gloss, start to chalk, show signs of
weathering, and possibly some rust staining. Future touch-up may be required on isolated coating
failures. If aesthetics are a concern, the Owner may have to topcoat the repainted tank prior to the end
of the expected service life. However, future topcoating would be less expensive than complete
cleaning and recoating and could delay the next complete cleaning and repainting for many years.
7. Other Systems: With air emission volatile organic compounds (VOC) restrictions being
put in place around the nation, alternative coating systems may become available which would be
viable options for this tank. The Owner should review the available systems prior to preparing
specifications for the recoating project.
8. Coating Curing: It would be more economical to paint the tank exterior at the same time
the interior is painted, since the tank must be drained while the exterior is painted, and the applied
coatings cure. This will also reduce mobilization and observation costs. 0
1, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 9
Mt. Prospect Public Works, Mt. Prqpest, Illinois 17 055.H3 73. 006
9. Rehabilitation Schedule: To obtain the lowest possible prices for the work outlined in the
recommendations, the Owner should have the specifications prepared and the work bid in the spring,
with the work scheduled to start in early summer (if possible).
10. Electrical Apparatus: All unused electrical conduit, antennas, fixtures, electrical
metering equipment, cathodic protection apparatus, and control cabinets should be removed from the
tank and tank site. All required equipment should be repaired and maintained in accordance with the
National Electric Code (NEC).
11. Grinding and Bracket Removal. Any unused brackets or erection lugs should be
removed prior to the exterior repainting. Any weld burrs, weld spatter, or erection scars should be
ground,off to provide a smooth surface for the application of the coating.
12. Nameplate: The tank nameplate should be removed for the cleaning and coating of the
tank. The nameplate should be cleaned and reattached to the tank using the existing bracket.
13. Existing Shell Manholes. At the time of recoating and repairs, the gaskets for the shell
manholes should be replaced. The covers should be equipped with hinged support arms located on the
exterior of the tank.
14. Exterior Ladder: The exterior ladder should be replaced with new ladder that meets
current dimensional requirements. Additionally, the exterior ladder did not include slip -resistant
rungs. Slip -resistant rungs are required .for all ladders constructed after March 1991 by the OSHA
Construction standards. However, slip -resistant rungs are not required by the OSHA General Industry
standards for ladders or by the AWWA D100. The cracked safe -climbing device should be repaired or
replaced and the device extended over the entire length of the ladder.
15. Roof Safety Railing. The toe bar should be replaced with a new toe bar which is at least
3-1/2 in. tall and allows a gap 1/4 in. or less between it and the roof The access opening should be
equipped with a self-closing gate.
16. Clog -Resistant Vent: The proper operation of the vent should be periodically verified.
C. Interior Surfaces
1, Life of the Interior Coating: The interior coating system appeared to be in fair to good
condition with the most extensive areas of corrosion located on the roof and its support structure. It is
likely the interior surfaces will require repainting within the next 2 to 3 years due to rafter corrosion
and corrosion observed above the high water level. The cathodic protection system did not appear to
be ffinctioning correctly as corrosion was observed below the high water level. The proper working
condition of the cathodic protection system should be verified, and the system repaired/modified and
properly maintained.
2. Coating Testing: Prior to preparation of specifications for the cleaning and coating of the
interior of the tank, samples of the interior coating system should be subjected to laboratory analysis to
test for ingredients which may at that time be subject to regulations concerning their handling and
disposal.
1, 000, 000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank "Tank 5E (South Tank) Page 10
Warks, Mt. Pro' ect, Illinois 17.055.H373.006
3. Recommended Interior Coating, System. -
a, Epoxy Coating System: The optimum long -life coating system presently available
for the interior of water tanks is a two -component epoxy coating system. A three -coat epoxy
system is recommended for the interior of this tank This coating system should meet the
certification criteria of ANSINSF 61 and state department of health regulations.
b. Coating Application: When the interior is to be repainted, the entire tank interior
should be cleaned to the equivalent of an SSPC-SP 10, bear -White Blast Cleaning and an epoxy
coating system applied.
C. Service Life: The typical life of a properly formulated and applied epoxy coating
system is approximately 12 to 15 years in immersion service. Tank Industry Consultants defines
the life of a coating as the expected service life before repainting becomes necessary due to
coating failure and corrosion.
4. Cathodic Protection: The cathodic protection system should be evaluated and adjusted by
the manufacturer, and then properly maintained.
5. Pit Welding and Pit Filling: After initial cleaning, all significant pitting which is found
should be welded, and all pitting with rough edges that would make the pitting difficult to coat properly
should be filled with a solventless epoxy seam sealer.
6. Rough Edges: All unused brackets should be removed from the interior and exterior
surfaces at the time of the next recoating. Any weld burrs, spatter, scars or rough edges in the steel
should be ground smooth to provide a better surface for coating.
7. Roof Support Structure: After abrasive blast cleaning, the roof support structure should
be carefully evaluated as metal loss repairs may be necessary at areas where the metal loss was not
previous visible. At this time, there was no significant metal loss observed, and all of the connections,
appeared to be in adequate condition. However, with the existing coating failure and corrosion,
structurally significant metal loss will likely occur within the next 3 to 5 years.
1, 000, 0,00 Gallon Ground Storage Tank, "Tank 5E (South Tank) Pago 13
Mt. Proseecf Public Works, Mt. Prospect, Illinois I 7.055.H3 73. 006
Anniversary and Maintenance Evaluations: An anniversary evaluation should be conducted prior to
the end of the one year bonded guarantee. Washouts and coating, structural, sanitary, safety, and
corrosion evaluations should be conducted not less than every 3 to 5 years.
Time Frame: If the work is not performed within the next 24 months, the structure should be
reevaluated prior to the preparation of specifications and solicitation of bids.
Specifications and Bidding Documents: The recommendations in this report are not intended to be
specifications on which a contractor can bid. Complete bidding, documents must include general and
special conditions, detailed technical specifications, and other information necessary for the
competitive bidding process. 'To properly protect the interests of the Owner, Contractor, and Engineer;
the initial evaluation, the technical specifications, legal portions of the contract documents, and the
observation should be performed by the same firm or with close coordination of all parties involved.
Limitations of Evaluation: It is believed that the conditions reported herein reflect the condition of
the tank as observed on the date of the evaluation, using reasonable care in making the observations,
and safety in gaining access to the tank. Should latent defects be discovered during the cleaning of the
structure, they should be brought to the attention of the Owner and the Engineer.
Seismic and Wind Loadings: This tank is located in or near a region of low seismic activity. This
evaluation and the reporting of the condition of this tank do not wan -ant the structural condition of the
tank or any of the original design for seismic loadings. Likewise, recommendations for this tank do not
include modifications which may be required for compliance with present structural codes. It is
possible the tank was erected in compliance with pre-existing industry standards which have since been
replaced by more restrictive standards.
Hazardous Materials in Coatings: Samples taken of the coatings on the exterior of this structure
indicated a presence of lead (and possible other heavy-metal) pigments. It should be taken into
consideration that Federal, State, and local environmental agencies have placed stricter controls on the
removal of lead-based and other heavy-metal based coatings from -steel structures by the use of
conventional abrasive blasting techniques. The paint and blast residue may be considered to be
hazardous waste depending on the concentration of lead or other particles in residue.
C lass if ic ation. of Adhesion
Test Results
Method A — X Cut Tape Test
Surface
Classification
Approx. 1.5 in. long cuts at 30 deg. IID 45 deg. apart.
No peeling or removal.
X
Trace peeling or removal along incisions.
4
Jogged removal otong incisions up to 1/16 in.
(1.6mm) on either side.
X
Jogged removal olong most V incisions up to 1/8 in..I
(3.2mm) on either side.
2
Removal from most of the area of the X under the
tape.
I
Removal beyond the orlea of the X.
X
0
Method B Lattice Cut Tope Test
Surface
Six porallei cuts at 21mm, apart.
Classification
The edges of the cuts are completely smooth;
nonie of the squares of the lattice are detached,
No Failure
5
Small flakes of the cwting ore detached at
intersections; less than 5% of the lattice is
V#
4
affected.
Small flakes of the coating are detached along
edges ond at intersections of The
111til
-44J444-
cuts. area
3
affected is 5% to 157 of the lattice.
The coating has flaked along the edges and on
parts of the squor6s. The area affected is 15%
2
to 35% of the lattice.
The coating has flaked along the edges of cuts
in large ribbons and whole squares hove, detached,
I
The area offected is 35% to 65% of the lottice.
Fluking and detachment worse than grade 1.
0
ASTM 3,359 Standard Test Methods for Measuring Adhesion by Tape Test
Tank InOustry---Q��t��t
77410 'West New York Street
Telephone —
317/271-3100
Indianapolis, Indiono 46214
FAX —
317/271-3300
�7
1. Tank and site.
2. Tank and site.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)"
17.055.H373.006
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
"
r. •, w
P x
w
s _ �
ta,
rn—
w
_ eta
w m •..dm ,f`,/�
a l
. ..7rjW r
Wmr.a
Y'
a L a. ,-
t
xr
0r
1p
7. Building on tank site:.
8. Tank site access.
It. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
IT055.11373.006
19
9�. Crack and exposed aggregate in tank foundation.
10. Crack and exposed aggregate in tank foundation.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank S (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17-055.H373.006
IJ
U-1
11. Valve vault access.
12. Valve vault access ladder and safe -
climbing device extension,
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
F �.A
s d
Sir"' .. .�^- j"yr. I'✓^ rs ,gym :W.dw
: r -a w8
U
17. Gap between overflow pipe and flap gate.
18. Pipe projection. in shell, conduit, and junction box.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)"' Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.1-1373.006
d
C,
05
19. Shell manhole and tank nameplate.
® A
e
20. Tank nameplate.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.113710106
17
7
MR
20. Tank nameplate.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.113710106
U
21. Coating failure, corrosion, and rust staining on shell manhole reinforcing pad.
22. Conduit extending up shell.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
r
23. Exterior ladder, safe -climbing device,
and vandal deterrent.
24. Coating failure and corrosion on exterior ladder side rail and bracket.
Mt. Prospect Public Works 'ITank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.1-1373.006
F
I_d
25. Shell coating.
26. Spot coating, failures and corrosion on shell.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
27. Shell coating.
28. Pecled topcoat on shell.
Y
wry
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)"' MC Prospect, Illinois
17.055A371006
I�
29. Cracked safe -climbing device tube at roof
30. Gap between roof safety railing toe bar and roof.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
F
3l . losure chains on roof safety railing access.
32. Roof safety railing access.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 51 (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
U
33. Exterior ladder, safe -climbing device, and roof safety railing.
34. Exterior ladder, safe -climbing device,
and roof safety railing. Note that safe -
climbing device terminates below top
rung.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "rank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
�L
35. Coating, failure and corrosion on, roof safety railing upright and roof.
36. Corrosion on exterior ladder brackets.
Mt. Prospect PUblic Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.11373.006
I
37. Conduit that extends across roof
38. Exterior ladder, safe -climbing device, roof vent, and antennas mounted on roof
Mt. Prospect Public Warks "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
U
A Roof coating condition.
40. Coating failure and corrosion at roof weld seam.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "'Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.11373-006
I
U
41. Roof coating.
42. Roof coating.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)"
17.055.H371006
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
— - —, ---I
43. Antennas on mast mounted to roof.
44. Antenna wire clamped to roof vent flange.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)"
17,055.H373.006
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
45. flog resistant roof vent.
46. Roof vent pallet.
Mt. Prospect Public Works
"Tank 5E (South Tank)"
17.055-H371006
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
�l
F
47. Roof manhole and cover.
48,. Interior roof and roof support structure.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illialois
IT055,H371006
b P �
�� � �u '� �
� � ��
,h � � �
,. .�-
w„
w1 � ,,��
r ,
•�,
�, _ _..:4.._ _._ _.-. _. _. 7.
", '�..� a .....
��
� �� � � � ,� � � � •.meg.
U
51. Coating failure and corrosion on roof support structure.
52. Coating failure and corrosion on roof support structure.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt` � Prospect, Illinois
17.055.14373.006
I
U
53. Coating failure and corrosion on roof support structure.
54. Coating failure and corrosion on roof support structure.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
IT055.H373.006
1J
55. Coating failure and corrosion on roof adjacent to roof rafter.
56. Rust stairting onto shell from top shell angle.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
57. Corrosion on T -rail and at roof -to -shell interface.
58. Corrosion, coating failure, and metal loss on TOOT rafter. I
Mt. Prospect Public Works
"Tank 5E (South Tank)"
1T055.H373.006
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
7
63. Interior shell, shell manhole, and cathodic protection equipment.
64. Coating failure and corrosion on shell manhole neck edge.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" It. Prospect, Illinois
17.055A371006
65. Cathodic protection reference electrode and wiring attachment to shell.
66. Touched -up colating on shell.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "rank 5E (South Taiik)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H371006
Y he
66. Touched -up colating on shell.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "rank 5E (South Taiik)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H371006
i�
I
11
67. Spot coating failures on shell.
68. Wiring penetration at shell -to -floor interface.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" W Prospect, Illinois
17.055.H373.006
11
U
69. Spot coating failure on shell near floor.
70. Spot coating failure on floor.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
IT055M373.006
a
°..
�.., 'Y.° - .�.. iM4� r� b'Y}���'MM y�� a1M m.. .��'07�+:.'�,� •X � �S ��." #y �6''�S�""��'"' Y.T
x m .}.d •+ 1�mlki'n� y� w iY f ne• 8r �!."b'4,P�9 'n"r. .
I
73. Cathodic protection equipment lying on floor.
74. Cathodic protection equipment lying, on floor.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "Tank 5E (South Tank)," Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17055R371006
75. Pipe penetration in floor.
N
�4 01,14
. . . .. . . . .
jv- A
g"v.p.,
A
Im
M mm
U.
y, F rvr -F�arlj
IF"
76. Pipe penetration in floor.
Mt. Prospect Public Wor6- "Tank 5E (South Tank)" Mt. Prospect, Illinois
17.055.14373.006
77. Sump in floor.
Mt. Prospect Public Works "'Tank 5E (South Tank)"
17.055. C4,3 1006
ML Prospect, Illinois